Text
Not just Apple: Microsoft has been quietly lobbying to kill Right to Repair bills

Apple pioneered the use of dirty tricks and lobbying to kill Right to Repair legislation, but theyâre not the only tech player whoâs putting lobbying muscle into ensuring that you canât decide who fixes your stuff (and when it is âunfixableâ and must be sent to the landfill).
Rep. Jeff Morris told iFixit Repair Radio that national Right to Repair legislation was killed by Microsoft, in a piece of horse trading that saw Microsoft backing funding for STEM education in exchange for Right to Repair (and unrelated privacy rules) dying.
https://boingboing.net/2019/04/15/ssdd.html
16K notes
·
View notes
Text
âMaybe in a year I could write something. There is something in me maybe someday to be written; now it is folded, and folded, and folded, like a note in school.â
â Sharon Olds, from âSeptember 2001: New York City,â in Stagâs Leap (Alfred A. Knopf, 2012)
16K notes
·
View notes
Video
116K notes
·
View notes
Text
âDonât compare your actual self to a hypothetical self. Donât drown in a sea of âwhat ifâsâ. Donât clutter your mind by imagining other versions of you, in parallel universes, where you made different decisions. (âŠ) To focus on regret does nothing but turn that very present into another thing you will wish you did differently. Accept your own reality. Be human enough to make mistakes. Be human enough not to dread the future. Be human enough to be (âŠ) enough. Accepting where you are in life makes it so much easier to be happy for other people without feeling terrible about yourself.â
â Matt Haig, Notes on a Nervous Planet
268 notes
·
View notes
Photo

â Kaspar, letâs pretend that this is a village. In this village live people who tell only the truth. Here is another village. The people here only tell lies. Two paths run from these villages to where you are standing and you are at the crossroads. A man comes along, and you want to know which village he comes from, the village of the truthtellers or the village of the liars. Now, in order to solve this problem, to solve it logically, you have one question, and only one. What is the question? ⊠I admit, the question is thorny. If you ask the man whether he comes from the village of truth, and he does, then he will say, truthfully, yes. But if he comes from the village of lies, he will lie, and also answer yes! Yet, there exists one question, and only one, which will solve the problem. ⊠If you canât think of the question, then I shall tell you. Well, here is the question: if you came from the other village, would you answer ânoâ if I were to ask you whether you came from the liarsâ village? By means of a double negative the liar is forced to tell the truth. This construction forces him to reveal his identity, you see. Thatâs what I call logic via argument to the truth!
â Well, I know another question.
â You do? There is no other question, by the laws of logic.
â There isnât? But I do know another question.
â Let us hear it, then!
â I should ask the man whether he was a tree-frog. The man from the truth village would say: No, Iâm not a tree-frog, because he tells the truth. The man from the liarsâ village would say: Yes, Iâm a tree-frog, because he would tell a lie. So I know where he comes from.
â No, thatâs not a proper question. That wonât do, I canât accept it as a question. Thatâs no logic; logic is deduction, not description. What youâve done is describe something, not deduce it.
(The Maid: But I understood his question.)
Understanding is secondary; the reasoning is the thing. In Logic and Mathematics we do not understand things, we reason and deduce! I cannot accept that question.
â From The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser (dir. Werner Herzog, 1974)
47 notes
·
View notes
Text



HELL ON EARTH â PALE MASTER
ON SALE TOMORROW
www.palemaster.bandcamp.com
0 notes
Text
âForest shade, lake shade, poplar shade, highway shade, backyard shade, cafĂ© shade, down-behind-the-high-school shade, cow shade, carport shade, blowing shade, dappled shade, shade darkened by rain above, shade under ships, shade along banks of snow, shade beneatht the one tree in a bright place, shade by the ice cream truck, shade in the new-car sales room, shade in halls of the palace as all the electric lights turn on, shade in a stairwell, shade in tea barrels, shade in books, shade of clouds running over a distant landscape, shade on bales in the barn, shade in the pantry, shade in the icehouse (the smell of shade), shade under runner blades, shade along branches, shade at night (a difficult research), shade on rungs of a ladder, shade on pats of butter sculpted to look like scallop shells, shade to holler from, shad in the chill of bamboo, shade at the core of an apple, confessional shade, shade of hair salons, shade in a joke, shade in the town hall, shade descending from legendary ancient hills, shade under the jaws of a dog with a bird in its mouth trotting along to the masterâs voice, shade at the back of the choir, shade in pleats, shade clinging to arrows in the quiver, shade in scars.â
â Anne Carson, âEach Day Unexpected Salvation (John Cage)â, in Penguin Modern Poets 1: If Iâm Scared We Canât Win: Emily Berry / Anne Carson / Sophie Collins (London: Penguin, 2016), p. 74.
274 notes
·
View notes
Text
âI donât know why I write. I prefer a ruin to a monument. I am calm during reunions. I have nothing against New Yearâs Eve. Fifteen years old is the middle of my life, regardless of when I die. I believe there is an afterlife, but not an afterdeath. I do not ask âdo you love me.â Only once can I say âIâm dyingâ without telling a lie. The best day of my life may already be behind me.â
â
Edouard LevĂ©, from âAutoportraitâ
(via endophoras)
375 notes
·
View notes
Text
Cioran on Nietzsche
âWell, I realised that he wasnât a philosopher, but was more: a temperament. So, I read him now and then, but never systematically. But I really donât read him anymore. I consider his letters his most authentic work, because in them heâs truthful, while in his other work heâs a prisoner to his vision. In his letters one sees that heâs just a poor fellow, that heâs ill, exactly the opposite of everything he claimed. [âŠ] His work is an unspeakable megalomania. When one reads the letters he wrote at the same time, one sees that heâs lamentable, itâs very touching, like a character out of Chekhov.
I was attached to him in my youth, but not later on. Heâs a great writer, though, a great stylist.â
155 notes
·
View notes
Video
youtube
âShock and Aweâ The Beginning of the 2003 Invasion of Iraq (CNN Live Coverage)
This is a recording of CNNâs coverage of the âShock and Aweâ campaign conducted at that time. Most tapes of this are only about ten minutes long. This is just over two hours. It covers from 8:19 PM to around 10:30 PM (Baghdad local time). The âShock and Aweâ campaign starts at 9:00 PM or about 40:30 . This video includes post-bombing statements from Secretary of the State Donald Rumsfeld, and Air Force General, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Richard Myers among others. 1:17:22
It has been 15 years to the day. Since then, America lost over 4,000 soldiers in Iraq.
More importantly, however, Iraq lost hundreds of thousands of civilians over the ensuing decade. So many innocent people died that we literally cannot count it, because, in the words of General Thomas Franks, âWe Donât Do Body Counts.â
That said, estimates range from 460,000 to 2.4 million.
There were no weapons of mass destruction, that was a lie. The only WMDs Saddam had were the ones the US gave him.
Saddam was not working with al-Qaeda. That was also a lie. Saddam working with al-Qaeda would have been like Augusto Pinochet secretly backing the Sandinistas. There was no presence, period, of al-Qaeda or any affiliated group in Iraq before the US invasion of the country.
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. This too was a lie, believed at the time because Americans were and are too fucking stupid to tell Arabs apart.
The Iraqis did not welcome the US as liberators. That this was in any way considered a possibility was not just a lie, it was probably a more damning indictment of the complete idiocy of the average American than the duplicity of American politicians.
The war did not secure any of our freedoms as well. As tens of thousands of full grown American adults voluntarily signed up to brutalize brown people on the other side of the world despite a complete lack of evidence that they had done anything to harm us, we at home were subject to an opaque, ever expanding security apparatus that included secret courts, secret no-fly lists, warrantless wiretaps, and effectively unrestricted mass surveillance. This structure has become effectively normalized, as there are now Americans reaching adulthood who have never experienced a world without it.
The US accomplished nothing more or less than the complete destruction of Iraqi society on a level not seen since the Mongols sacked Baghdad, leaving behind a corrupt and ineffectual government that could not repel the advances of the Islamic State, a terror group that the US had itself effectively created, even when Iraqi troops outnumbered the Salafists ten to one during engagements.
Luckily, the US learned its lesson, and never attempted to destabilize a secular Arab republic again.
335 notes
·
View notes