systemissues707

[systemissues707]

This is going to sound so "oldie yells at cloud" of me but the radicalisation of the young into black and white, zero shades of grey thinking, both in the media they consume and in real life situations, is genuinely terrifying.

The world is complex. The world is grey. There is infinite nuance in everything. No amount of trying to shove it all into neatly labeled boxes is ever going to work.

[systemissues707]

[Text ID: This system loves their partner system more than there are stars in the night sky.]

Like/reblog if you save or use!!

[systemissues707]

[systemissues707]

[systemissues707]

[systemissues707]

“you’re killing my tough guy personality >:(“

“who’s a good boy?”

“meeeee :3”

[systemissues707]

@ollie-duck

t.he character s

[systemissues707]

you guys don’t even understand what GoodTimesWithScar means to me. Funniest character to ever exist. He’s the server’s sexy pool boy and marriage counselor and he’s bad at all of his jobs and you can never tell if it’s through intentional sabotage or genuine incompetence and then you see him build the most beautiful thing you’ve ever seen and log out. He’s not a himbo because he’s a genius and master manipulator but he decided a long time ago that he cares more about having abs and giant tits than proving to anyone that he’s smart. He can cry on command and make you think he’s the most helpless creature on the planet and then turn around and fire an arrow from 200 blocks away and get a headshot and kill you. And then he turns around trips over his own feet and drowns in four inches of water. I’m literally obsessed with him

[systemissues707]

@ollie-duck

I just came up with a really inconvenient, possibly unplayable four-player game: The Evil Advisor

All you need is a completely normal chess board and a deck of cards that you can somehow divide into an even amount of cards that mean "yes" or "no". Out of the four players, only two need to know how to play chess - those play the role of advisor. The other two play as rulers. At the start of the game, both advisors pull a random card from the deck, which dictates whether their goal is to win the game, or lose it. They keep their respective card, showing it to nobody else.

The rulers, who ultimately choose where to move the pieces, always aim to win the chess game, and also know that the advisor may or may not be on their side, and don't know whether to trust the advisor or not.

If the ruler wins the chess game, they win the whole game. An advisor only wins if they reach their own goal - if an advisor's goal was to lose, but the ruler wins, the advisor loses, and vice versa.

[systemissues707]

@ollie-duck

You all seemed to like the last one of these so um *tosses this at you and evaporates *

[systemissues707]

@ollie-duck

[systemissues707]

@ollie-duck

watching ds9 for the first time and wtf why does Julian have an evil emperor's new groove potion cabinet

[systemissues707]

@ollie-duck

let’s be squished by mama

[systemissues707]

Handsome

[systemissues707]

As usual—and as cosmically predicted—when an Israeli turned away from a Kyoto hotel, not for behavior, but for nationality, the internet applauds—47,000 people engaging in moral grandstanding masquerading as justice. Discrimination just got a standing ovation.

Meanwhile, posts from Jewish voices calling out the discrimination barely scrape 1,000. It’s a digital double standard: hate spreads like wildfire, but the people experiencing it struggle to be heard.

Posts dress up antisemitism as “activism"— hate becomes palatable when it’s wrapped in ideological jargon or partisan posturing. It’s brutal: hate is loud, proud, and viral, while those living it are drowned out and ignored. When did cruelty become more clickable than calling out cruelty ?

[systemissues707]

GRIAN

[systemissues707]

sorry can’t talk i’m too busy romanticizing vampirism