#10 different lectures and documents and powerpoints etc
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
this report is about to be the worst work of my degree thus far
#that's not true it can't get worse than the embedded programming exam#but wow the information is contradicting#emailed the professor for help and he replied at 9pm on a sunday#??#but what he said wasn't very helpful#also condescending#'it should be simple to figure out that...' no it's not#was going to push on since i'm behind on my schedule but#it's half 10#very tired#and feeling like i want to end it all#or maybe hit something#or drop out#this stuff would be manageable if it had clear instruction and wasn't a mess spread over#10 different lectures and documents and powerpoints etc
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Tableau Public Tutorial Pdf

Details
Training Summary
Tableau is a pioneering data visualization tool. Tableau connects to almost any data source like Datawarehouse, Excel, Database, etc. It provides real-time data insights in a matter of minutes. In this Tableau for beginners tutorial, you will learn Tableau basics. You will learn all the Tableau concepts and you will get Tableau tutorial PDF with this Tableau course.
On top of the Tableau Public icon on your desktop to open. O At the dialog box, click OK to connect. O Tableau automatically recognizes catego rical fields, like “State,” and numerical measures like “ Adult obesity rate.” Create the first view (a map for each state showing obesity rates at the county level): o Double click on “State. Tableau Tutorial: Lecture 10 Advanced Tableau Visualization Using Waterfall Char 05:42 Tableau Tutorial: Lecture 11 Tableau Calculations and LOD (Level of details).
What should I know?
This free Tableau for beginners tutorial is designed for absolute beginners. There is a Tableau basics PDF provided with this guide below.
Course Syllabus
Introduction
TutorialWhat is Tableau? Application, Use & Differentiation from Excel TutorialTableau Architecture & Server Components TutorialHow to Download & Install Tableau Public (Free) & Desktop (Trial) TutorialIntroduction to Tableau Desktop Software: Workspace & Navigation
Advanced Stuff
TutorialTableau Data Connections to Databases and Multiple Sources TutorialTypes of Filters in Tableau: Condition by Formula, Extract, Context TutorialTableau Create Group, Hierarchy, Sets & Sort Data TutorialTableau Charts & Graphs Tutorial: Types & Examples TutorialTableau vs Power BI: Key Differences Tutorial10 Best Tableau Competitors | Alternative (Open-source/Paid) TutorialTableau Tutorial PDF for Beginners (FREE Download)
Before printing, specify how you want the printed page to look using the Page Setup dialog box. Then print to a printer or PDF.
Set up the page
You can apply different page setup options for each worksheet in a workbook, For example, worksheets can print with titles showing or hidden, with unique page orientation, and more.
To begin, select File > Page Setup.
General settings (available for individual sheets, not dashboards)
Show - Show or hide the title, view, caption, color legend, shape legend, size legend, and map legend.
Headers and Breaks - Control the appearance of these table elements.
Sigil for marriage definition. Repeat headers and legends on each page - adds table row and column headers at the top of each printed page when a view breaks across several pages.
Break pages on pane boundaries - prevents page breaks in the middle of a table cell.
Pages Shelf - If the view uses the Pages Shelf, specify whether to print the current page or all pages.
Layout settings
Legend Layout - If you include one or more legends, select how you want the legends to appear on the printed page.
Margins - Specify top, bottom, left, and right margins by typing values into the text boxes.
Centering - Optionally, select whether to center the view horizontally or vertically—or both—on the page.
Print Scaling settings
These settings affect only printed documents, not exported images or PDFs. However, the page orientation settings are used as the default when you publish the workbook to Tableau Online or Tableau Server.
Print Scaling - Scale a view to fit within a single page or print across multiple pages. Select from the following options:
Automatic – Scales the view automatically based on the paper size.
Scale to – Scales the view to the specified percentage of its original size.
Fit to – Scales the view to fit within the specified area. Select the number of printed pages across and down. For example, if you have a really wide view that is not very tall, you can specify three pages across by one page down.
Page Orientation - Specify how you want the view oriented on the printed page. Select from the following options:
Use Printer Setting – Use the page orientation that is already specified by the printer.
Portrait – Presents the view so that it is oriented vertically on the printed page.
Landscape – Presents the view so that it is oriented horizontally on the printed page.
The following diagram shows the difference between portrait and landscape page orientations.
Print a view
After you have configured the Page Setup settings, select File > Print. The following options in the Print dialog box are unique to Tableau.
Show Selections
When this option is selected any selections you’ve made in the views will be maintained while printing.
Change the Print Range
When you print from a workbook with multiple worksheets, each worksheet represents one or more printed pages, depending on the page setup.
Select from the following print ranges:
Entire Workbook - Prints all the worksheets in the workbook.
Active Sheet - Prints only the sheet currently displayed in the workbook.
Selected Sheets - Prints the selected sheets.
Tableau Public Tutorial Pdf For Beginners
You can select multiple worksheets in a workbook by holding down the CTRL or Shift keys (or the z key on a Mac) while clicking the worksheet tabs that you want to select.
Print to PDF
Note: If you're using Tableau Online or Tableau Server, instead see Download Views and Workbooks and Link to a PNG, PDF, or CSV of a View.
In Tableau Desktop, you can save views as PDF files rather than printing them as hard copies. You do not need to have Adobe Acrobat installed on your computer.
When you print an individual sheet to PDF, filters in the view are not included. To show filters, create a dashboard containing the sheet and export the dashboard to PDF.
Print to PDF using a Windows computer
Specify page setup options for each sheet in your workbook.
Select File > Print to PDF.
In the Print to PDF dialog box, select the print Range:
Entire Workbook - Publishes all the sheets in the workbook.
Active Sheet - Publishes only the sheet currently displayed in the workbook.
Deep partial thickness burn. Selected Sheets - Publishes the selected sheets. To select multiple sheets in a Tableau workbook, hold down the Ctrl key as you select sheet tabs along the bottom of the Tableau workbook.
Select a Paper Size. If you select Unspecified, the paper size will expand to the necessary size to fit the entire view on a single page.
Select View PDF File After Printing if you want to automatically open the PDF after creating it. This option is only available if you have Adobe Acrobat Reader or Adobe Acrobat installed on your computer.
Select whether to Show Selections. When this option is selected the selections in the views are maintained in the PDF.
Click OK and specify where you want to save the PDF. Then click Save.
Tableau Public Tutorial Pdf Download
Print to PDF using a Mac computer
Specify page setup options for each sheet in your workbook.
Does manycam work with zoom. Connect ManyCam to Zoom. Getting Started Introduction to ManyCam. Getting started with ManyCam. ManyCam tray icon. ManyCam Main Live window. ManyCam Interface. ManyCam Video Settings - Quality & Performance. ManyCam is the go-to software to enhance your live video on streaming platform, video conferencing app and distant classes. Add multiple cameras and video sources, such as mobile and PowerPoint, use virtual backgrounds, create layers and presets, screencast desktop, and more. Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise video communications, with an easy, reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing, chat, and webinars across mobile, desktop, and room systems. Zoom Rooms is the original software-based conference room solution used around the world in board, conference, huddle, and training rooms, as well as executive offices and classrooms.
Select File > Print.
In the Print dialog box, click Show Details to select a print range:
Entire Workbook - Publishes all the sheets in the workbook.
Active Sheet - Publishes only the sheet currently displayed in the workbook.
Selected Sheets - Publishes the selected sheets. To select multiple sheets in a Tableau workbook, hold down the Command key as you select sheet tabs along the bottom of the Tableau workbook.
Click PDF > Save as PDF.
Specify where you want to save the PDF, then click Save.
Tableau Public Tutorial Pdf Free
Thanks for your feedback!

0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on http://www.typingrates.com/50-online-companies-with-the-best-typing-services-rates-in-2019/
50+ Online Companies with the Best Typing Services Rates in 2019
Looking for the perfect typing service does not have to be a tedious task. Since there are a lot of options online to choose from, we have gathered the top 50 online companies with the best typing services rates. This way, you can select the one that matches your requirements and standards. Check them out.
Find the Best Typing Service of 2019 Suitable for You
TypingService.org
TypingService.org is, without a doubt, the best typing service provider. They have a specialized team of expert typists ready to help you with your tasks. Plus, their manuscript typing services rates will surely match your budget. Their expert team can help you with different documents like journals, manuscripts, manuals, lectures, resumes, etc. They do not only provide professional typing services, but they can also assist you through their data entry service, their secretarial services, and their transcription help.
These are their rates for different conversion types:
Rates PDF to Doc from $0.80 per page PDF to XLSX from $0.80 per page JPG to XLSX from $0.80 per page PDF to LaTex from $2.40 per page Web Page to Word from $3.00 per page Equations Typing from $5.60 per page
Note: bear in mind that the minimum order price is $3.00.
TranscriptionServicesUS.com
TranscriptionServicesUS.com provides a multilingual typing service. Their international team can work with over 100 languages. They can also work with different materials and formats.
These are the different rates they have. You will see that they depend on the requirements for your project.
Rates Typing with formatting: English documents from $4.50 per page Other languages from $7.00 per page Typing without formatting: English from $3.75 per page Other languages from $5.00 per page +500 pages from $1.00 per page Audio typing: Up to five hours from $0.99 per minute +5 hours from $0.89 per minute +10 hours from $0.79 per minute +20 hours from $0.69 per minute Legal typing: From $5.00 per page
BestTypingServices.net
BestTypingServices.net is a professional typing service company that has excellent customer reviews. They have an expert team of typist that always guarantee to deliver accurately typed documents. Their team can help you with several documents like medical documents, legal papers, academic essays, etc.
Rates PDF to Word $0.95 per page Excel to Word $0.95 per page PNG to Word $1.00 per page Handwriting to Word or Excel $1.40 per page Word to LaTex $3.00 per page Equations Typing $7.00 per page
DollarTypingService.com
DollarTypingService.com has budget-friendly typing rates. They promise to keep their rates under a dollar per page. Their expert team will make sure to deliver accurately typed documents free of errors.
Rates Printed copying typing from $0.40 per page Handwritten manuscript from $0.60 per page Audio transcription from $0.50 per minute
Note: the minimum order price is $50.00.
ProfessionalTypist.net
ProfessionalTypist.net has great customers reviews. Their team can deliver highly accurate typed documents on the same day. They can work with different formats and can even help you to edit your paper. Their expert team will make sure your text is free of errors and impeccable.
Rates PDF to Word from $1.00 per page Excel to Word from $1.00 per page PNG to Word from $1.10 per page Word to Excel from $1.00 per page Handwriting to Word from $1.20 per page Handrwriting to Excel from $1.60 per page Word to LaTex from $3.00 per page Other types of conversion from $4.00 per page
SpeedGets.com
SpeedGets.com has a professional team of +800 transcribers. They have a high satisfaction rate among their customers and their team always work hard to maintain it. They work with a 24 hours turnaround frame, so they will always meet your deadline.
Rates
Audio typing from $0.99 per minute
Typing with formatting:
English papers from $3.00 per page
Other languages papers from $7.00 per page
Typing without formatting:
English from $2.00 per page
Other languages from $5.00 per page
MathTyping.com
MathTyping.com is the perfect choice for you if you need to type mathematical documents. Their expert team will make sure to type accurately any equations and formulas. Their professional typists have advanced degrees and many years of experience working with technical documents.
Rates
Equations typing – from $5.60 per page
Word to LaTex – from $2.40 per page
LaTex to Word – from $2.40 per page
Handwriting to Excel – from $3.00 per page
AllTranscript.org
AllTranscripts.org is a 24/7 typing service provider. They have over eight years of experience typing documents and can ensure to deliver an accurate paper. Plus, you can easily upload your documents through their site.
Rates
Three days delivery – from $1.10 per minute
48 hours delivery – from $1.50 per minute
24 hours delivery – from $1.75 per minute
Note that all their rates include a free proofreading service
ReType.biz
ReType.biz provides professional retyping and typing services. Their expert team can help you with your typing task, so you can get rid of all the hassle that comes with typing a document. Their team of professional typists is composed of experts with advanced degrees that have native English language skills. Plus, they guarantee to deliver a paper free of mistakes, so they provide a free proofreading revision with every order.
Rates
PDF to Word – from $1.00 per page
PNG to Word – from $1.00 per page
Excel to Word – from $1.00 per page
Word to Excel – from $1.00 per page
PDF to Excel – from $1.00 per page
Handwriting to Word – from $1.50 per page
Handwriting to Excel – from $1.50 per page
PDF to LaTex – from $3.00 per page
Word to LaTex – from $3.00 per page
AcademiaTranscriptionServices.com
AcademiaTranscriptionServices.com can type academic documents accurately. They can deliver your order in 24 hours. Plus, you can be sure that they will only deliver documents that are free of errors.
Rates
These are their prices for academic typing services:
5 days delivery – from $0.57 per minute
3 days delivery – from $0.74 per minute
48 hours delivery – from $0.91 per minute
24 hours delivery – from $1.14 per minute
Note: that these prices are based on one speaker. For more speakers, the prices will go up.
TypingServicesNZ.com
TypingServicesNZ.com has been a typing service provider for many years. They have a top-class team of typists ready to work with you. Their experienced team is specialized in several subjects and can help you with technical papers, like medical documents. They also offer a six hours turnaround if you place an urgent order.
Rates
PDF to Word – from $0.89 per page
Excel to Word – from $0.89 per page
PNG to Word – from $0.93 per page
Word to Excel – from $0.93 per page
PDF to Excel – from $1.21 per page
Handwriting to Word – from $1.31 per page
Handwriting to Excel – from $1.31 per page
PDF to LaTex – from $2.80 per page
Word to LaTex – from $2.80 per page
Equations typing – from $6.52 per page
Survey form to Word – from $1.21 per page
Word page to Word – $0.93
eVirtualServices.com
eVirtualServices.com provides typing services as well as data entry help. They can efficiently type your document or enter your data in the blink of an eye. Plus, their expert team will make sure to deliver a highly accurate paper.
Rates
Check their data typing rates and fees:
Data entry from $4.98 per hour
SEO services from $499 per month
TypingDocs.com
TypingDocs.com is a professional typing service company with a team of top-level typists. Their amazing team works fast and can deliver your order on the same day. They guarantee to deliver an accurately typed paper. With TypingDocs.com, you can be sure your projects will meet their deadline.
Rates
PDF to Word – from $1.00 per page
PNG to Word – from $1.00 per page
Word to Excel – from $1.00 per page
Handwritten to Word – from $1.50 per page
PDF to LaTex – from $3.00 per page
Other – from $4.00 per page
CaliforniaMultiservices.com
CaliforniaMultiservices.com is a top rated typing service provider. They always deliver impeccable documents that are highly accurately typed. Their multilingual team can also provide typing assistance in multiple languages, not just English.
Rates
Typing with formatting:
English – from $4.50 per page
Other languages – from $7.00 per page
Typing without formatting:
English – from $3.75 per page
Other languages – from $5.00 per page
+500 pages – from $1.00 per page
Audio typing:
Up to 5 hours – $0.99 per minute
+5 hours – $0.89 per minute
+10 hours – $0.79 per minute
+20 hours – $0.69 per minute
TranscriptionServices.com
TranscriptionServices.com is an online typing service provider. They have an interactive platform where you can upload your documents so that their team can start typing them. Their expert team can work with written material, digital files, audio, and video.
Rates
Typing service from $0.09 per line
Audio typing from $60 per hour
TranscriptionUS.com
TranscriptionUS.com has a team of US-based transcribers to help you with your typing tasks. They can efficiently type any document and deliver a quality paper. They can even convert visual images to text data. Plus, they have a money-back guarantee in case you do not like their work.
Rates
Transcription – from $0.70 per minute
Verbatim transcription – from $0.90 per minute
Legal transcription – from $1.25 per minute
Note that the minimum order price is $25
FingerTipsTyping.co.uk
FingerTipsTyping.co.uk is a legal typing service provider. They have a specialized team that can help you with any legal document. They will accurately type your papers making sure the right tone and style have been used. Their team can help you type interviews recordings, medical reports, legal papers, conferences, focus groups, etc.
Rates
Their legal typing services rates are:
Copy typing and word processing – from $11.33 per 1,000 words
Powerpoint – from $8.81 per slide
Audio transcription – from $1.38 per minute
Interviews transcription – from $1.51 per minute
AtHomeTypingService.com
AtHomeTyping.com in as established virtual typing company since 1988. It was founded by Edna Van Baulen and has been helping customers for over 30 years. Their typing team can help you type different materials, as well as transcribe audio files. They will always make sure your paper is flawless, so they will run a grammar and spelling check before delivering your order.
Rates
Double spaced pages:
1-300 pages – from $4.00 per page
301-600 – from $3.00 per page
+601 – from $2.00 per page
Single spaced pages:
1-300 pages – from $4.50 per page
301-600 – from $3.50 per page
+601 – from $2.50 per page
ShalomTranscription.com
ShalomTranscription.com offers prime typing services. They work with business, academic, and personal documents. Their fantastic team has many years of experience and knows how to type each document.
Rates
Typing without formatting – from $1.00 per page
Formatted page typing – from $2.00 per page
Handwritten manual typing – from $2.00 per page
Book typing – from $1.00 per page
Transcription – from $0.80 per minute
Legal transcription – from $1.25 per minute
Note that the minimum order price is $25.00
Assist-NY.com
Assist-NY.con has a multilingual team of expert typists. They can work in different languages and deliver accurate documents. Their team is made of +500 experts specialized in several fields.
Rates
Typing with formatting:
English – from $4.50 per page
Other languages – from $7.00 per page
Typing without formatting:
English – from $3.75 per page
Other languages – from $5.00 per page
+500 pages – from $1.00 per page
Audio typing:
Up to 5 hours – $0.99 per minute
More than 5 hours – $0.89 per minute
More than 10 hours – $0.79 per minute
More than 20 hours – $0.69 per minute
LegalType.co.nz
LegalType.co.nz is a legal typing service provider founded in 2002. Their team of expert typists is specialized in the legal field and can work accurately with different documents. They guarantee to provide a confidential and professional typing service, that is cost effective and provides quick turnaround times.
Rates
Single-voice recordings – from $2.00 per minute
Multi-voice recordings – from $40.00 per hour
NYCityTranscription.com
NYCityTranscript.com is a leading company that offers cheap typing services. They have an expert team with more than 23 years of experience typing different documents. Their skilled team can work with different formats, and they can help you edit your paper. These are some of the papers their team can type: form letters, manuscripts, professional documents, correspondence, research papers, menus, dissertations, screenplays, term papers, etc.
Rates
Typed copy – from $1.50 per page
Handwritten copy – $2.00 per page
Transcription – from $1.50 per minute
TypeWriteTranscription.co.za
TypeWriteTranscription.co.za has been helping customers with their typing tasks for many years. They can help you type reports, manuals, interviews, etc. They provide a special rate for students, so make sure you ask for it if you are a student. To send them your files, you can easily upload them through their Dropbox account, or send them to their email.
Rates
Typing – from $1.91 per page
Transcription – from $0.83 per minute
Top Rated Services in 2019
NikannTranscriptionTyping.co.za
NikannTranscriptionTyping.co.za offer transcription and typing solutions to business, organizations, professionals, and individuals. Their highly professional typing service includes proper formatting of papers to make sure they can easily implement some changes to adequate it to the right formatting. They can work with letters, wills, reports, theses, mathematical documents, manuals, academic documents, study notes, resumes, etc.
Rates
Typing – from $1.74 per page
Transcription – from $0.69 per minute
Editing – from $1.74 per page
Formatting – from $1.39 per page
GoTranscript.com
GoTranscript.com can help you type your documents so that you do not have to worry about it. They have an expert team of typists that can work with printed documents, handwritten material, digital papers, audio, or any other format your content may have. They have a turnaround time of six hours which makes them perfect for urgent orders. Their specialized team guarantees to deliver a highly accurate paper free of mistakes. Plus, they have a 98.5% customer satisfaction.
Rates
Five-day delivery – from $3.00 per page
Three-day delivery – from $4.00 per page
One-day delivery – from $5.01 per page
Six to 12 hours delivery – from $6.02
Transcription – from $0.80 per minute
TranscriptionPro.net
TranscriptionPro.net has been the number one typing choice for many customers. Their quality results and professional team has helped them achieve excellent reviews. The company was founded in 2008, and since then, they have not stopped growing. They have an expert team of professionals that can work with different documents and materials. Plus, they will always make sure they deliver an impeccable text free of mistakes.
Rates
One speaker recording – $1.00 per minute
Timestamps – an additional $0.25 per minute
Clean read – an additional $0.25 per minute
Verbatim – an additional $0.25 per minute
1stClass.uk.com
1stClass.uk.com is an online secretarial service provider. Among their services, they provide digital audio transcription and copy typing services. They have been helping customers since 1999. Among their clients, they have worked with governmental departments, universities, small businesses, professionals, academics, and more. As part of their typing service, their team can work with resumes, business letters, reports, invoices, spreadsheets, etc. Their full-time professional team will go the extra mile to deliver a highly accurate typed document.
Rates
Copy typing – from $15.11 per 1,000 words
Audio typing – from $1.25 per minute
VananServices.com
VananServices.com has a multilingual team that can help you with type your documents even if they are not written in English.
Rates
The different rates they have will depend on the requirements for your project.
For typing with formatting:
English papers from $4.50 per page
Other languages $7.00 per page
For typing without formatting:
+500 pages in English from $1.00 per page
Up to 400 pages in English from $3.75 per page
Other languages from $5.00 per page
QuickTranscriptionService.com
QuickTranscriptionService.com delivers fast and accurate typing services. They can work with multiple languages and make sure your paper does not contain any typos. They have a 24 hours turnaround time and can work with multiple formats.
Rates
Typing with formatting:
English documents – from $4.50 per page
Other languages – from $7.00 per page
Typing without formatting:
English – from $3.75 per page
Other languages – from $5.00 per page
+500 pages – from $1.00 per page
Audio typing:
Up to five hours – $0.99 per minute
More than five hours – $0.89 per minute
More than ten hours – $0.79 per minute
More than 20 hours – $0.69 per minute
TypingGlobal.com
TypingGlobal.com it is one of the most affordable online typing services. They only work with certified typists to ensure your project is accurately typed. They can work with multiple languages and deliver urgent orders in a short period of time.
Rates
Typing with formatting:
English – from $4.50 per page
Other languages – from $7.00 per page
Typing without formatting:
English – from $3.75 per page
Other languages – from $5.00 per page
+500 pages – from $1.00 per page
Audio typing:
Up to 5 hours – $0.99 per minute
More than 5 hours – $0.89 per minute
More than 10 hours – $0.79 per minute
More than 20 hours – $0.69 per minute
AhTypingService.com
AhTypingService.com provides affordable and high-quality typing services. Their team will go the extra mile to make sure your paper is free of mistakes. When working with them, you can be sure that their team will deliver an accurate paper on time, while making sure your details are kept confidential.
Rates
Printed/Typed/PDF – from $0.50 per page
Handwritten document – from $0.70 per page
Copy typing double spaced – from $0.60 per page
Copy typing single spaced – from $0.80 per page
PDF to Word – from $0.50 per page
WayWithWords.net
WayWithWords.net can work with printed material, as well as audio and video. Their skilled team can work with any type of recording, and they accept material with different accents. As part of their services, they can deliver your audio transcription with intelligent or full verbatim.
Rates
Check their document typing services prices:
Basic transcription – from $1.56 per minute
Full verbatim transcription – from $2.22 per minute
Time coding transcription – from $2.22 per minute
Note that these prices are based on a ten days turnaround time
Proofreading.org
Proofreading.org has a professional team that can work with written material and content. They can proofread, edit, and type different documents. They even have a professional team of typists that can assist you with your audio files. They can help you type your recordings accurately. Their skilled team can work with academic papers, legal documents, medical reports, audio, video, to name just a few.
Rates
Audio typing – from $1.80 to $2.40 per minute depending on the type of recording
GMRTranscription.com
GMRTranscription.com has a US-based team of professionals. They have over 14 years of experience typing and transcribing different materials. Their highly-specialized team guarantees to deliver accurately typed documents free of mistakes. Over the years, GMRTranscription.com has worked with different clients like small businesses, professionals, academics, big organizations, and individuals. They have helped many satisfied customers and they are always ready to take a new challenge.
Rates
English transcription:
Up to two speakers – from $1.25 per minute
Multiple speakers – from $1.50 per minute
Video transcription:
Up to two speakers – from $1.75 per minute
Multiple speakers – from $2.00 per minute
Text typing:
14 days turnaround time – $6.00 per page
7 days – $8.00 per page
3 days – $10.00 per page
Next day service – $12.00
Same day service – $15.00
TypeOut.co.uk
TypeOut.co.uk is a professional online typing service provider specialized in audio materials. They have over ten years of experience and have helped many happy customers since they were founded. Besides providing a prime typing service, they also have affordable rates that will match your budget. Their skilled team can work with different recordings, and you can upload your material through their site.
Rates
Audio transcription with one voice – from $1.32per minute
Audio transcription with two voices – from $1.38 per minute
Audio transcription with three to five voices – from $1.57 per minute
Audio transcription with six to nine voices – from $1.76 per minute
Audio transcription with more than 10 voices – from $1.89 per minute
XSTyping.com
XSTyping.com is a small typing service provider with a team of native English professionals. They work with written content and audio files. Thanks to their expert team they can guarantee to deliver quality typed materials. Their professional team can work with digital content files, as well as traditional formats like cassettes and CDs.
Rates
Copy typing – from $9.44 per 1,000 words
Transcription – from $1.01 per minute
TypingSolutions.org.uk
TypingSolutions.org.uk is one of the most popular UK’s typing service providers. They provide typing solutions and can work with text and audio. Their professional team of typists will make sure to type accurately any document you may need. They will only deliver papers that are free of mistakes and that meet your requirements. They can work with any size of a project and still meet your deadline.
Rates
Copy typing:
Handwritten copy – from $11.33 per 1,000 words
Text – from $10.70 per 1,000 words
Audio typing:
Interview – from $1.51 per minute
Conference – from $1.51 per minute
Focus group – from $1.64 per minute
PureScriptServices.com
PureScriptServices.com provides one of the fastest typing services. Their team can work with more than 200 languages, and hundreds of different materials. They are committed to delivering quality results. Thus, they will always make sure your paper has been accurately typed and that it does not contain any errors. These are some of the materials their team can type for you: equations, lectures, handwritten notes, books, manuals, journals, memorandums, resumes, surveys, and the list goes on.
Rates
English language typing with formatting – from $2.00 per page
English language typing with formatting +50 pages – from $1.00 per page
Other languages with formatting – from $4.00 per page
Transcription – from $0.99 per minute
Legal transcription – from $2.00 per minute
OmDataEntryIndia.com
OmDataEntryIndia.com is an online company based in India that has been providing typing services for over five years. They have a professional team of typists that can help you with audio typing, book typing, copy typing, digital typing, documents typing services, legal typing, manuscripts typing, and much more. They will make sure their professionals deliver a highly accurate typed document in a short period of time. Plus, you can try their services for free through their free trial run.
Rates
Typing service – from $3.00 per hour
PDF to Excel – from $3.00 per hour
PDF to Word – from $3.00 per hour
Transcription – from $0.60 per minute
DataEntryInc.com
DataEntryInc.com is a global typing service provider. They have customers all over the world and have been helping them for over three years. Their typing department can work with different formats like PDFs, Word, Excel, HTML, TIFF, JPEG, PNG, and the list goes on. Their professional typists can help you type your manuscripts, legal documents, resumes, copy, study materials, lectures, notes, books, digital content, etc. And, they provide online and offline typing help.
Rates
Online data entry – from $3.00 per hour
Transcription – from $0.60 per minute
Typing – from $3.00 per hour
DigitalTranscripts.com.au
DigitalTranscripts.com.au is typing company based in Australia. They provide online typing help for their international customers. It was founded in 2004 and they have helped thousands of customers since then. Their expert typists always proofread and revise the document before sending it to the client. Thus, they always make sure their papers meet their high/quality standards. Through their online platform, anyone can upload their documents 24/7, so there is no need to wait until they are open.
Rates
Single voice dictation – from $1.90 per minute
Two to three voices dictation – from $1.95 per minute
More than four voices dictation – from $2.35 per minute
TaurHo-Transcribes.co.uk
TaurHo-Transcribes.co.uk has great clients testimonials that you can read on their wite. They pride in what they do and they work hard to maintain their high customer satisfaction rate. They provide a professional typing service that will definitely meet your requirements.
Rates
Smart verbatim – from $0.97 per minute
Full verbatim – from $1.30 per minute
Smart verbatim with time coded – from $1.21 per minute
Full verbatim with time coded – from $1.55 per minute
LondonTranscription.co.uk
LondonTranscription.co.uk provides professional transcripts carried out by real typists. Through their copy typing service, they can help you type any document. All you need to do is scan it, and send it to them. They can work with handwritten material too.
Rates
Copy typing – from $6.92 per 1,000 words
Single voice transcription – form $1.13 per minute
Interview transcription – from $1.26 per minute
Focus group transcription – from $1.38 per minute
TranscriptDivas.com.au
TranscriptDivas.com.au guarantees to always meet your deadline. Their typing team will make sure they deliver a 98% accurate typed paper. They can work with video, audio files, academic papers, and much more. But what makes them different from the rest, is that with TranscriptDivas.com.au you will not have to pay until you receive the final draft. This way you can guarantee that you are truly happy with it.
Rates
7 business day delivery – $2.30 per minute
3 business day delivery – $2.50 per minute
2 business day delivery – $2.80 per minute
1 business day delivery – $3.20 per minute
Same business day – $3.70 per minute
BlackCountryTyping.com
BlackCountryTyping.com is a professional typing and transcription company. They provide different services like general transcription, interview transcription, copy typing, media transcription, secretarial services, etc. Even though they are a small business, they always focus on quality and customer satisfaction.
Rates
Copy typing:
Printed text – from $8.18 for 1,000 words
Handwritten material – from $9.44 for 1,000 words
Transcription:
General transcription – from $1.01 per minute
WeType.uk
WeType.uk is an online typing service company that provides access to their professional typists. They have an interactive app that you can download to your phone. With it, you can record the material you want them to transcribe directly from your phone. Once you have it, you can send it fro your device without having to copy it to your computer.
Rates
Standard voice dictation – from $1.38 per minute
Multiple voice recordings – from $1.64 per minute
NewYorkOnlineServices.com
NewYorkOnlineServices.com is an online services provider. They offer transcription, translation, captioning, voice over, subtitling, and typing services. Their typing service is carried out by professional typist that guarantees to deliver impeccable papers. They have international professionals that can help you type documents that are written in a language different from English.
Rates
These are their typing services cost per page.
Typing with formatting:
English documents – from $2.50 per page
Other languages – from $7.00 per page
Typing without formatting:
English – from $2.00 per page
Other languages – from $5.00 per page
+100 pages – from $1.00 per page
Audio typing:
Up to five hours – from $0.69 per minute
+5 hours – from $0.89 per minute
+10 hours – from $0.79 per minute
+20 hours – from $0.69 per minute
UniversityTranscriptions.co.uk
UniversityTranscriptions.co.uk is typing service provider specialized in academic documents. They have worked with papers from different universities. Their expert team of typists will always revise a document before sending it. Thus, they guarantee to always deliver impeccable papers.
Rates
Copy typing – from $0.03 per word
Transcription – from $1.01 per minute
ExpectPerfection.com
ExpectPerfection.com provides accurate and professional transcription and typing services. They have a high customer satisfaction which ensures they will work hard to meet your requirements.
Rates
Text to word transcription – from $4.00 per page
Audio transcription – from $129 per hour
Video transcription – from $129 per hour
Note that the text to word transcription service has a $27.00 processing fee per file
TexasSpace.com
TexasSpace.com has thousands of happy customers all over the world. Every time someone purchases their typing services, they work hard to meet their requirements. Their expert team always proofread and edit the document before sending it. Plus, they guarantee to always deliver a highly accurate typed paper.
Rates
These are their prices for typing services.
Typing with formatting:
English documents – from $4.50 per page
Other languages – from $7.00 per page
Typing without formatting:
English – from $3.75 per page
Other languages – from $5.00 per page
+500 pages – from $1.00 per page
Audio typing:
Up to five hours – from $0.99 per minute
+5 hours – from $0.89 per minute
+10 hours – from $0.79 per minute
+20 hours – from $0.69 per minute
Legal typing:
From $5.00 per page
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://punjabassignmenthelp.com/mng81001-management-communication-assignment-2/
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION Assignment 2
MNG81001 MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
Assessment 2 PERSUASIVE MEMO Document design Part 1: Memo format
Part 2: Five (5) Powerpoint slides
Due Date Friday 20th April 2, 2018
9.00am (QLD time)
Length 750 words total (memo and PPT slides) (+/- 10%) Weight 20%
Memo (70% or 14/20)
PPT slides (30% or 6/20)
Assessment Task
An exciting new approach to teamwork has resulted from advances in information technology, shifting employee expectations and the globalisation of business, namely the virtual team. A virtual team is made up of geographically or organisationally dispersed members who are linked primarily through advanced information and telecommunications technologies.
Your Sydney HQ is developing a new marketing team with team members located in Sydney, New York, Beijing and Mumbai. This will necessitate the establishment of a virtual team spread over four different time zones using both synchronous (real time) and asynchronous (not concurrent) communication. One of the primary advantages of virtual teams is the ability to assemble the most talented group of people to complete a complex project through creativity and innovation.
On a practical level the virtual team can also save employees’ time and cut travel expenses. However, virtual teams also present unique challenges. A number of the team have expressed concerns about how it will all work, and whether meetings might be scheduled when one part of the team is about to go to lunch, while the other part is asleep. Other concerns include: language difficulties, time-and-distance challenges, the absence of face-to-face contact, as well as the barriers posed by cultural differences such as work-pacing, communication styles, decision-making, and the perception of deadlines.
To help ‘sell’ the idea and persuade the team members of the advantages of the virtual team your boss, the Marketing Director, is planning a virtual meeting with all team members. She is aware of the concerns and knows that the issues raised by the staff have the potential to provide rich soil for misunderstandings and conflict. To that end she understands how important this presentation will be in creating a favourable association with virtual teams, as well as a good opportunity to start to build engagement, trust and candour among the team members.
To prepare for the virtual meeting she has asked you to prepare two documents:
a short report (using the memo format) identifying some of the critical areas that need to be addressed when leading and managing virtual teams; and
(ii) a PowerPoint slide presentation comprising no more than five slides highlighting three practices for establishing effective virtual teams and solutions for achieving such practices (recommendations or how it’s done).
Please note:
Persuasion aims to influence other people’s behaviours and attitudes. Successful persuasion shows readers ‘what’s in it for them’.
Persuasive writing, or the argument, is one of the main types of both corporate writing and academic writing. At work, some of the persuasive documents you might have to write are proposals, offers to clients, and memos suggesting alternative methods or new ways of doing particular tasks.
Persuasive writing has all the features of analytical writing (that is, information plus reorganising the information), with the addition of your own point of view. Most essays at university are persuasive, and there is a persuasive element in at least the discussion and conclusion of a research article.
Please follow these guidelines to complete the assessment:
To help reach your own point of view on the facts or ideas:
read some other points of view on the topic. Who do you feel is the most convincing?
look for patterns in the data or references. Where is the evidence strongest? ◦
list several different interpretations. What are the real-life implications of each one? Which ones are likely to be most useful or beneficial? Which ones have some problems?
discuss the facts and ideas with someone else. Do you agree with their point of view?
To develop your argument:
list the different reasons for your point of view.
think about the different types and sources of evidence which you can use to support your point of view.
consider different ways that your point of view is similar to, and different from, the points of view of other researchers.
look for various ways to break your point of view into parts.
To present your argument, make sure:
your text develops a coherent argument where all the individual claims work together to support your overall point of view.
your reasoning for each claim is clear to the reader.
your assumptions are valid.
you have evidence for every claim you make.
you use evidence that is convincing and directly relevant.
Use three to five secondary sources.
Submit Assessment 2 to Turnitin via the Blackboard site no later that the due date: Friday 20th April 2018 9.00am (QLD time).
Refer to the Marking Criteria Guide and Marking Rubric located under Assessment Details.
PRIOS/CDT brief (covered in lecture and tutorials) for Assessment 2:
Purpose: The purpose of this document is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools and persuade team members of the benefits and advantages of working as a virtual team.
Readers: Your boss (the Marketing Director of XYZ Company).
Information: Based on secondary sources.
Organisation: Direct order approach (start with you most significant criterion, etc.)
Style: Formal. Focus on being clear and concise, not flowery or overly-descriptive. Be sure to proofread carefully to ensure that there are no sentence-level errors such as spelling mistakes, wrong word choice, incorrect punctuation, etc.
Channel choice: Written document.
Document design: Part 1: Memo format. Part 2: Powerpoint slides.
Length: Total 750 words for both Part 1 and Part 2. A good target for each Powerpoint slide would be a three-word title plus a maximum of five bullet points of four words each.
Assessment Overview
It is strongly advised that the assessment instructions and marking criteria be considered alongside the Assessment Marking Rubric. Other Resources and Discussions will be posted on the Discussion Board.
This is a graded unit and grades are awarded as detailed in the University’s Rules Relating to Awards. To achieve a passing grade in the unit all assessment tasks must be submitted and an overall mark of 50% or more must be obtained.
Special consideration
All applications for Special Consideration need to be submitted before the due date of the assessment item.
If you would like to apply for Special Consideration please go to the following link and select the appropriate button: https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/student-administration/special-consideration/
Submission of Special Consideration form, together with all supporting documentation does not guarantee Special Consideration will be granted. NB: Only the Unit Assessor can approve a Special Consideration application.
Requests for special consideration in relation to assessment tasks shall only be considered on the following grounds:
health (including impacts of religious fasting);
compassionate circumstances;
religious observances or celebrations;
serious unforeseen personal events;
selection in State, national or international sporting or cultural events;
rendering genuine and unforeseen emergency service in a professional or voluntary capacity; or
rendering any service (including undertaking training) in the Defence Reserves.
Computer failure will not be accepted as a reason for missing an assessment deadline: you are strongly advised to backup all of your work, for example on a USB flash drive, to ensure that you are still able to submit to a deadline in the event of a computer related failure.
For more information see the following sections of Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations <http://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00140>
Section 4 — Grounds for Special Consideration
Section 5 — Types of Special Consideration
Section 6 — Examination and Special Examination Periods
Late penalties
Any assignment submitted after the due date will be processed in accordance with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedures. In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through Special Consideration procedures, the late submission of an assessment task will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty.
Specifically, this means a deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark achieved by the student, one minute after the due date and time specified by the Unit Assessor. A further deduction of 5% of the available mark from the actual mark will then be imposed for each 24 hour period that the assignment remains overdue. For full details of the For full details of the penalty and how it is applied, please refer to SCU’s Assessment Policy and Procures, available on the unit’s Blackboard site.
A practical example
Assume that you have an assessment that is worth 30 marks and you submit your paper 1.5 days late. After assessing it in the same way that all other papers are assessed, your tutor determine that you should receive 20 marks. As per the Late Submission policy, 1.5 marks should initially be deducted (5% of 30). A further 1.5 marks should also be deducted for the one complete 24 hour period that the assignment was overdue. A total of 3 marks should therefore be deducted, leaving a final mark of 17.
Please note that late assignments are likely to be returned with a significantly reduced amount of feedback.
Academic Integrity
Students are reminded of the extremely serious view the University takes with regard to plagiarism and are strongly advised to read the university’s policies on academic integrity and the penalties associated with academic misconduct (see: https://policies.scu.edu.au/ view.current.php?id=00142, as well as information in the UIG).
Plagiarism means claiming credit for someone else’s intellectual work. If you find any of the following problems in your academic writing, you may be guilty of plagiarising someone else’s work.
Copying
This includes copying materials, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document, presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
Inappropriate paraphrasing skills, resulting in copying the written expression of someone else without acknowledgement
Distortion of meaning.
Missing attribution.
Missing quotation marks.
Relying too much on other people’s material.
Inappropriate and inadequate citation and missing reference entry.
Inadequate citation of images.
Self-plagiarising.
It is important you understand what constitutes using sources responsibly. If in doubt, please discuss with your tutor.
Assignment Resubmission
Assignment resubmission is permitted in the unit MNG81001 Management Communication for those students who have received a fail grade in either assessment item 1, 2 or 3. The resubmit is for one assessment item only and the result will be awarded either a pass (of 50% of the mark for the assessment item) or fail grade.
Further details on resubmission will be made available after the release of Assessment 3 grades.
Turnitin
All assessment items (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be lodged through Turnitin accompanied by an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’.
Student Access and Inclusion
Please see: (https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/student-access– inclusion/)
Marking criteria/weighting: Memo (70% or 14/20)
Evaluation criteria
Task 1. Format,
Introduction,
& Conclusion
Is the memo format used fully and appropriately?
Does the introduction, body and conclusion contain all the identifying features ?
Are the elements of the introductory and concluding paragraphs clear, relevant and informative?
Purpose & Audience
Has the student understood the task and covered the key points?
Does the response adequately address the topic and task?
Does this document take into account the needs of the audience?
Does this document provide adequate information for the reader?
Does the writer thoroughly address any potential questions from the reader?
Credibility
Is the student able to convince the reader that they are knowledgeable about the topic?
Are claims backed up?
Sources cited?
Are sources reliable and authoritative?
Does the student understand the proper attribution rules?
Do the appearance, accuracy and clarity of the writing give credibility?
Referencing
Has the SCU Harvard reference style been used?
Does every source have:
The name of the author(s)
The full title; and
Complete publication information?
Are sources cited in the body of the paper and in the reference list at the end of the paper?
Are the right model citations used?
Readability
Is there a clear structure to the response?
Do the paragraphs contain one main idea that is explored using relevant evidence?
Is there cohesion between sentences?
Are internal headings clear and informative and enhance the readability for the audience?
Language
Is there a range of vocabulary?
Are sentences grammatically correct?
Are sentences accurate and complete?
Has a spell check been used?
Is spelling accurate?
Marking criteria/weighting: PowerPoint slides (30% or 6/20)
Format, visual appeal and referencing
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Purpose, audience, and credibility
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 – 49 50 – 64 65 – 74 75 – 84 85 – 100 <10 10 – 12.5 13 – 14.5 15 – 16.5 17+ Multiple parts of the assignment are missing or incomplete. Student fails to answer the question. Essential elements are imprecise or absent. Work at a level that would be considered basic. Key elements are presented but could be further developed and given ore depth. Most aspects included in a final, well-developed form. The assignment contains all required elements and is of the highest order.
0 notes