#427 ipc | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

best-legal-directory-of-india · 3 months ago

Text

#section 427 #legal consequences #427 ipc #section 427 ipc #Indian Penal Code #ipc

0 notes

newsblogs1-blog · 4 years ago

Text

Growing Concerns Over Safety and Justice for Women in India

The safety of women, especially those belonging to vulnerable communities, has long been a pressing issue in India. Cases of harassment, assault, and other crimes against women often highlight systemic shortcomings in addressing such violations. The following case sheds light on the ongoing struggle for justice and security faced by women, particularly those from the Northeast working in metropolitan areas.

Businessman Sahil Zaroo Accused of Rape and Threats

New Delhi-based Kashmiri businessman Sahil Zaroo, who was arrested last month for raping and threatening a young professional from Northeast India, was slated for a bail hearing on Thursday. The hearing was later postponed to September 29.

The incident allegedly happened on August 16, after which Zaroo reportedly fled to Srinagar. He was, however, arrested by the Delhi Police in record 24 hours after the survivor lodged an FIR on August 18.

"The accused Sahil Zaroo was arrested by Delhi Police from Jammu and Kashmir within 24 hours of the complaint. He is in judicial custody and his bail hearing was fixed on September 22, which got postponed to September 23," Additional Commissioner of Delhi Police Hibu Tamang said.

The accused reportedly drugged the girl after a party in South Delhi, when she lost consciousness and fell prey to the heinous crime.

The survivor allegedly told Zaroo that she worked as cabin crew with an airline, after which Zaroo allegedly offered her a job in his private charter flight service. Despite having refused, Zaroo allegedly insisted that the girl take the job offer, with accommodation at his private penthouse. He forced her to stay back after the party to show her his penthouse, according to an FIR filed by the survivor.

The survivor was then drugged, after which she fell unconscious and woke up to find herself in different clothes with her undergarments missing. She was reportedly sick all day and it was not until she fully regained consciousness that she found out that something terrible had happened with her, the survivor reported to the police.

The survivor registered an FIR against Sahil Zaroo vide FIR No. 252/21 under section 376 and 328 IPC, on August 18, 2021. Zaroo then contacted her through WhatsApp and threatened to send the cops for narcotic tests and put her behind bars. Sources close to the case alleged he was confident that her blood test results would show a presence of drugs, since Zaroo had drugged the victim.

Zaroo also reportedly offered the survivor money and kept trying to persuade her to settle the matter and to take the case back. The survivor's flat mates and common friends with Zaroo have reportedly been giving him information about the survivor's whereabouts, said a statement to the cops submitted by a friend who was also at the Greater Kailash party.

The survivor is being given protection by the Special Unit For Northeast Region (SPUNER) Delhi Police whenever they step out.

Meanwhile, Sahil Zaroo's wife Saima Majid filed a counter-complaint against the girl after Zaroo’s arrest, accusing the survivor of blackmailing, extortion, and honey trapping. Majid lodged a complaint with the SHO, Greater Kailash on August 30, alleging that the survivor lied to her husband and cheated him for money.

Zaroo: Chequered Past, Dubious Claims

This is not the first time Zaroo has come under the scrutiny of the police. As early as 2006, Sahil Zaroo was involved in the famous NDPS case of Rahul Mahajan which was registered at the Tughlak Road Police Station.

He was also questioned in the NIA case related to "Hawala Money" in connection with DSP Davinder Singh, J&K Police. Another case vide FIR 32/2008 under sections 232, 354, 427, 506, 509, 541, 389 of the IPC was registered against Zaroo for slapping Bollywood actress Sonal Chauhan of Jannat movie fame in 2008.

"This person is well connected and is a habitual offender. He should not get bail. Exemplary action should be taken against such persons. They should be in jail," said Dr. Alana Golmei, a New Delhi-based advocate representing the survivor.

"For us in the Northeast and our young girls, this is not the first time they are going through this. I have been fighting for more than 10 years for justice for our young girls who have come here and worked and who have been sexually assaulted. Whether it is rape or any other offence, they don't get justice," said the activist-lawyer on the difficulties faced by women from the Northeast to fight against violation of their rights.

"It is high time that despite the person (accused) being well connected and influential, rape is seen as rape. Whether rich or not, the same treatment must be given to all perpetrators of the crime. Such examples will reduce these kinds of crimes against women from the northeast and other parts of the country," Dr. Golmei added.

A Call for Action

This case underscores the pressing need for systemic reforms in ensuring women’s safety and access to justice. It also highlights the plight of individuals from marginalized communities who often find themselves battling against powerful adversaries.

The incident serves as a grim reminder of the persistent challenges women face and the necessity for society and authorities to stand united against such crimes. Addressing these issues with urgency and fairness is paramount to fostering a safer and more inclusive environment for all.

0 notes

seemabhatnagar · 1 year ago

Text

The Dark Trail: Sonia Keshwani’s Extortion Chronicles

Sonia Keshwani v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Mohit Dudeja Crl. Misc. Case No. 11714/2024 Before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur Heard by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Maninder S Bhatti J Order: The case was dismissed by the court because directallegations against the applicant Sonia Keshwani. Background This is the Regular first bail application filed U/s 439 Cr P C by the Applicant Sonia Keshwani for the offence registered against her U/s 384, 389, 452, 506, 427 IPC. Submission of the Counsel of the Applicant 1. The allegation of the prosecution that the applicant came to the house of the complainant and attempted to ransack it is false. Neither any amount nor any kind of property or valuable security was delivered to the applicant. Hence, no case of extortion is made out in terms of section 383 and no case could have been registered U/s 384 IPC. 2. The Trial Court rejected the bail application on the ground that there are other cases of similar nature registered in the past against the applicant. 3. The Trial Court was required to appreciate that previously as many as four cases were lodged by the present applicant against her husband Vikas Ramrakhyani. 4. Previous cases could not have been made the basis to reject the bail application of the applicant. 5. The applicant is innocent and has been in custody since 19.2.2024. 6. The applicant herself is a victim & has been falsely implicated. Submission of the Counsel of the State 1. Applicant is in the hashtag#habit of hashtag#lodgingfalse and frivolous hashtag#cases. 2. The Trial Court has rightly rejected the bail application of the applicant. 3. The Trial Court has considered details of all previous cases. 4. The present applicant, is in the habit of hashtag#blackmailing and hashtag#manypersons have been made hashtag#scapegoats at the instance of the present applicant. 5. The applicant even lodged the false First Information Report against the persons and, therefore, the applicant is not entitled to a grant of bail. 6. In the present case there are direct allegations against the applicant. 7. It is alleged that the applicant while threatening the complainant extorted money and even ransacked the shop of the complainant and the hashtag#conduct of the applicant was also hashtag#captured in hashtag#CCTV of the hashtag#shop. 8. The application for bail deserves to be dismissed. Observation of the Court 1. A perusal of the case diary reflects that there are hashtag#directallegations of hashtag#extortion against the applicant. 2. The statement of Mohit Dudeja, the complainant, also reflects that upon being threatened he gave a sum of Rs.1,80,000/- to the present applicant. 3. It is also not in dispute that the present applicant has also lodged 5 cases under Section 376 I.P.C against different persons including two cases against one Vikas Ramrakhyani who, according to the applicant, is her husband. Seema Bhatnagar

#HABIT #FALSE AND FRIVILOUS CASES #EXTORTION

1 note · View note

gurumog · 3 years ago

Photo

A panel from Judge Dredd: The Midnight Surfer (part 04) 2000AD Prog 427, 20th july1985 IPC Magazines Ltd.

Art: Cam Kennedy

#judge dredd #2000ad #prog 427 #cam kennedy

3 notes · View notes

dainiksamachar · 2 years ago

Text

करप्शन केस में गिरफ्तार सफदरजंग अस्पताल के डॉक्टर पर नई आफत, 6 साल पुराने मर्डर केस में भी कसेगा फंदा

नई दिल्ली: राजधानी दिल्ली के में पैसों के बदले इलाज करने वाले डॉक्टर मनीष रावत पर नई आफत मडरा रही है। एक 6 साल पुराने मर्डर केस में भी उनपर शिकंजा कसेगा। इसी सप्ताह सीबीआई ने डॉक्टर रावत को गिरफ्तार किया था। छह साल पहले गाजियाबाद में उनकी ऑडी कार ने एक ऑटो को टक्कर मार दी थी। इस हादसे में ऑटो में सवार चार लोगों की मौत हो गई थी। कोर्ट के सामने दूसरे शख्स ने कबूल किया आरोपये घटना गाजियाबाद के इंदिरापुरम में 28 जनवरी 2017 को हुई। हादसे के बाद रावत ने पुलिस को बताया था कि वह कार नहीं चला रहे थे। लेकिन उन पर लापरवाही से गाड़ी चलाने और आईपीसी की अन्य धाराओं के तहत आरोप लगे थे। इस मामले में अदालत में कई मोड़ आए। बाद में 15 फरवरी 2021 को एक स्थानीय अदालत ने डॉक्टर को राहत दे दी। अदालत में इशाक अहमद नाम के शख्स ने दावा किया कि एक्सीडेंट वाली रात वो कार चला रहा था। बाद में ये शख्स सैयद अहमद कादरी निकला। इसके बाद कादरी पर मुकदमा चलाया गया। हाई कोर्ट जाएगा पीड़ितों का परिवाररोड एक्सीडेंट ऑटो ड्राइवर और तीन चचेरे भाई-बहनों की मौत हो गई। शनिवार को अदालत के फैसले पर पीड़ितों के परिवार ने कहा कि वे रावत को छोड़ने के फैसले से खुश नहीं हैं और निचली अदालत के फैसले को चुनौती देने के लिए हाई कोर्ट जाने की योजना बना रहे हैं। मृतक की मां सुनीता कहती है, 'मेरा बेटा यजुवेंद्र सिंह सेंगर एक्सीडेंट में मारा गया। सीबीआई ने जब डॉ रावत को गिरफ्तार किया तो हमारी उम्मीद फिर से जाग गई है। हमें उम्मीद है कि एक्सीडेंट वाला केस फिर से खोला ज��एगा और न्याय दिया जाएगा। इस मामले में सीबीआई जांच की भी मांग करते हैं।' उन्होंने बताया कि रोड एक्सीडेंट केस को हाई कोर्ट में दायर करने के लिए वकील से संपर्क किया है। हादसे के बाद पुलिस ने दर्ज कर ली थी कारयजुवेंद्र और विशाल गाजियाबाद में एक प्राइवेट कंपनी में इंटरव्यू देने गए थे। उनके रिश्तेदार, रिंकू सेंगर और ऑटो चालक संजीव कुमार की भी मौत हो गई जब एक तेज रफ्तार ऑडी Q7 (DL11CA3420) ने गलत साइड से 12.15 बजे ऑटो को टक्कर मार दी। इस हादसे के बाद 28 जनवरी 2017 को पुलिस ने IPC की धारा 279, 304A और 427 के तहत मामला दर्ज किया। इंदिरापुरम थाने में अज्ञात लोगों क�� खिलाफ FIR दर्ज की गई। पुलिस ने वसुंधरा के ओलिव काउंटी निवासी डॉक्टर रावत के नाम दर्ज कार को जब्त कर लिया। कादरी ने कोर्ट के सामने किया सरेंडरतीन दिन बाद 31 जनवरी को कादरी ने खुद को इशाक अहमद बताते हुए अदालत में सरेंडर कर दिया। उसने दावा किया कि हादसे वाली रात वो गाड़ी चला रहा था। कादरी को उसी दिन जमानत पर रिहा कर दिया गया था। उसे अप्रैल 2017 में मुंबई में एक मोबाइल चोरी के मामले में फिर से गिरफ्तार किया गया था। पीड़ितों के वकील मुस्तकीम अहमद ने कहा कि अदालत ने कादरी के सरेंडर को स्वीकार करके उसे जमानत दे दी। इस मामले का खुलासा तब हुआ जब पुलिस उसके एड्रेस को वेरिफाई करने के लिए बरेली गई, जहां उन्हें पता चला कि असली इशाक अहमद एक ट्रक ड्राइवर और कादरी का रिश्तेदार है। फोन लोकेशन से खुला राजबाद में कादरी ने अदालत को बताया कि बरेली निवासी राजकुमार ने ही उन्हें डॉक्टर रावत के बारे में बताया था, जिन्हें गाजियाबाद में एक कार ड्राइवर की जरूरत थी। 28 जनवरी 2017 की रात मैं कार चला रहा था, जबकि हादसे वक्त डॉ रावत मेरे बगल में बैठे थे। ऑडी का एयरबैग खुलने से हम बच गए। गाजियाबाद पुलिस ने 23 अक्टूबर 2017 को डॉ. रावत, कादरी और राजकुमार के खिलाफ चार्जशीट दायर की थी। चार्जशीट में कहा गया है कि कॉल डिटेल्स से पता चलता है कि न तो इशाक और न ही कादरी दुर्घटनास्थल पर थे। मौके पर केवल डॉ रावत की लोकेशन मिली थी। इससे पता चलता है कि जब दुर्घटना हुई तो वह कार चला रहा था। कहानी में फिर आया नया मोड़इस मामले के जांच अधिकारी का ट्रांसफर हो गया और नए अधिकारी जे एन शर्मा ने दूसरी चार्जशीट दायर की, जिसमें 27 दिसंबर 2018 को आईपीसी की धारा 279, 304ए और 427 के तहत केवल कादरी पर आरोप लगाया गया। 15 फरवरी 2021 को मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट की अदालत गाजियाबाद में इस चार्जशीट के आधार पर डॉ. रावत और राजकुमार की अर्जी स्वीकार कर ली और कादरी के खिलाफ केस जारी रखा। इस केस में अगली सुनवाई 4 अप्रैल को होनी है। http://dlvr.it/Sls94y

0 notes

762175 · 2 years ago

Text

'Godman' Dhriendra Shastri's brother booked for allegedly pointing gun at a wedding function in Madhya Pradesh

Self-styled ‘Godman’ Dhriendra Shastri’s brother Shaligram Garg has been booked for allegedly using abusive language, pointing a gun, and threatening the father of a Dalit girl during a wedding function in Madhya Pradesh’s Chhatarpur. Bamitha Police has filed an FIR against Shaligram Garg under sections 294, 323, 506, and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as well as the SC/ST Act. The matter…

View On WordPress

0 notes

news24fr · 2 years ago

Text

La Cour suprême doit prononcer mercredi son ordonnance sur la demande de libération sous caution du fils du ministre de l'Union Ajay Kumar Mishra, Ashish Mishra, accusé dans l'affaire des violences de Lakhimpur Kheri en 2021. Conformément à la liste des causes du 25 janvier téléchargée sur le site Web du tribunal supérieur, un banc de juges Surya Kant et JK Maheshwari prononcera l'ordonnance. Le banc avait le 19 janvier réservé son ordonnance sur la candidature de Mishra. Le 3 octobre 2021, huit personnes ont été tuées à Tikunia, dans le district de Lakhimpur Kheri, où des violences avaient éclaté lorsque des agriculteurs protestaient contre la visite du vice-ministre en chef de l'Uttar Pradesh, Keshav Prasad Maurya, dans la région. Selon le FIR de la police de l'Uttar Pradesh, quatre agriculteurs ont été fauchés par un SUV dans lequel Ashish Mishra était assis. Suite à l'incident, le conducteur du SUV et deux employés du BJP auraient été lynchés par des agriculteurs en colère. Un journaliste est également mort dans les violences. Le banc de Lucknow de la Haute Cour d'Allahabad avait rejeté le 26 juillet de l'année dernière la demande de libération sous caution d'Ashish Mishra. Il a contesté l'ordonnance de la Haute Cour devant la Cour suprême. Lors de l'audience du 19 janvier, la haute cour avait observé qu'un accusé ne devait pas être incarcéré pour une durée indéterminée à moins qu'il ne soit prouvé coupable d'une infraction. Tout en réservant son ordonnance sur le moyen, la formation avait dit qu'il s'agissait d'une mise en balance des droits des parties. S'opposant à la demande de libération sous caution, l'avocat général supplémentaire pour l'Uttar Pradesh Garima Prashad avait déclaré qu'il s'agissait d'un crime grave et odieux et que l'octroi d'une caution enverrait un mauvais signal à la société. L'avocat principal Dushyant Dave, comparaissant pour ceux qui s'opposent au plaidoyer de libération sous caution, avait déclaré que l'élargissement de Mishra sous caution enverrait un message terrible à la société. L'avocat principal Mukul Rohatgi, représentant Ashish Mishra, s'était fermement opposé à la soumission de Dave et a déclaré que son client était en détention depuis plus d'un an et que le déroulement du procès prendrait sept à huit ans pour le terminer. Le 6 décembre de l'année dernière, le tribunal de première instance avait porté des accusations contre Ashish Mishra et 12 autres personnes pour les infractions présumées de meurtre, de complot criminel et d'autres lois pénales dans le cas du décès des quatre agriculteurs qui manifestaient à Lakhimpur Kheri, ouvrant la voie à la début du procès. Au total, 13 accusés, dont Ashish Mishra, ont été inculpés en vertu des articles 147 et 148 du Code pénal indien (IPC) liés à des émeutes, 149 (rassemblement illégal), 302 (meurtre), 307 (tentative de meurtre), 326 (provoquant volontairement blessure grave par des armes ou des moyens dangereux), 427 (m��fait) et 120B (peine pour complot criminel), et l'article 177 de la loi sur les véhicules à moteur. Les 12 autres accusés sont Ankit Das, Nandan Singh Bisht, Latif Kale, Satyam alias Satya Prakash Tripathi, Shekhar Bharti, Sumit Jaiswal, Ashish Pandey, Lavkush Rana, Shishu Pal, Ullas Kumar alias Mohit Trivedi, Rinku Rana et Dharmendra Banjara. Tous sont en prison.

0 notes

thegulfindians · 3 years ago

Text

Thiruvanathapuram court frames charges against minister V Sivankutty, 4 others in Assembly ruckus case

All the six accused are facing charges under sections 447 (criminal trespass), 427 (mischief causing damage), read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sec 3(1) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property (PDPP) Act. Thiruvananthapuram: A court in Kerala on Wednesday framed charges against General Education Minister V Sivankutty and some other prominent LDF leaders in the 2015…

View On WordPress

0 notes

alwaysfirst · 3 years ago

Text

Kerala HC rejects bail plea of SFI leader in attempt to murder case

Jul 12, 2022 15:20 IST Kochi (Kerala) , July 12 (AF): The Kerala High Court has dismissed the bail petition of the state secretary of the Students' Federation of India, the student wing of CPIM, PM Arsho in connection with many cases including an attempt to murder. On June 12, Kerala Police arrested him in this matter and also for violating the bail conditions following which he was remanded to 14-day judicial custody. SFI workers felicitated PM Arsho by raising slogans and putting garlands just before entering the sub-jail in Kakkanad district. He was felicitated when the police brought him to the sub-jail. The Kerala High Court had cancelled the bail of Arsho in connection with an attempt to murder case observing that he was involved in the 12 cases during the bail period. The case against the leader was registered in 2018. The case against the SFI leader was registered in 2018. He was arrested for a case registered under sections 308, 355, 323, 324, 506, and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for allegedly attacking a student. Arsho was involved in 12 cases after obtaining bail in the murder attempt case. Observing this, a Single Bench of Justice Sunil Thomas issued an order cancelling his bail in February this year. The court also asked the police to arrest him immediately. But police submitted in the High Court that he was absconding. (AF) Read the full article

0 notes

kupwaratimes-fan · 3 years ago

Text

9 held in Delhi's Jahangirpuri violence; 9 persons injured

9 held in Delhi’s Jahangirpuri violence; 9 persons injured

9 held in Delhi’s Jahangirpuri violence; 9 persons injured Noida (Uttar Pradesh): A day after violence broke out between two groups in Delhi’s Jahangirpuri, nine people have been held so far, said police on Sunday. Police have lodged a case under sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 353, 332, 323, 427, 436, 307, 120B IPC read with 27 Arms Act. During the violence nine people, including eight policemen…

View On WordPress

#9 held in Delhi&039;s Jahangirpuri violence; 9 persons injured

0 notes

advocateshashankshekhardwivedi · 3 years ago

Text

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday said that mere incorporation of Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder) in the FIR and the charge-sheet, would not be a bar to the compromise entered into between the parties to put an end to the disputes between them.

Observing thus, the Bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi allowed a 482 CrPC application filed by the applicants seeking quashing of the summoning order, in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 427, 307 IPC.

It was informed to the Court that with the intervention of respected persons and relatives, the parties have entered into a compromise and there is no dispute remaining between them and the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 do not want any action against the applicants.

The opposite parties no. 2 and 3 (victims) appeared before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki along with their Advocates and they accepted the compromise. Now, in their 482 plea, they sought quashing of the Chargesheet.

Court's order

Before proceeding to decide the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in terms of the compromise, the Court examined the question as to whether the charge-sheet and the proceedings of a case can be quashed on the basis of a compromise entered into between the parties.

For this purpose, the Court referred to Apex Court's ruling in the case of Narinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another; (2014) 6 SCC 466, later on, followed by the Supreme Court in State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan (2019) 5 SCC 688.

Essentially, in Laxmi Narayan case, the Supreme Court had observed that though offences under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act etc. would fall in the category of heinous and serious offences such offences can't be quashed by HCs in the exercise of powers under Section 482 of the Code, only on the ground that the parties have resolved their entire dispute amongst themselves.

However, the Court had further observed that the High Court would not rest its decision merely because there is a mention of Section 307 IPC in the FIR or the charge is framed under this provision.

"It would be open to the High Court to examine as to whether incorporation of Section 307 IPC is there for the sake of it or the prosecution has collected sufficient evidence, which if proved, would lead to framing the charge under Section 307 IPC. For this purpose, it would be open to the High Court to go by the nature of injury sustained, whether such injury is inflicted on the vital/delegate parts of the body, nature of weapons used etc"

Against this backdrop, the Court noted that although the FIR and the charge-sheet in the case made a mention of Section 307 IPC, the medical examination report of the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 mentioned simple injuries of contusions and abrasions only and there was no report of any serious injury having been suffered by the opposite parties no. 2 and 3.

Further, the Court observed that none of the injuries is reported to have been inflicted on any vital part of the body of any of the injured persons. The injuries are reported to have been caused by a hard and blunt object.

https://linktr.ee/advocateshashankshekhardwivedi

In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the Court opined that continuance of the proceedings of the case even after the parties have entered into a compromise would only result in persecution of the applicants, which would give rise to a failure of justice.

Therefore, the Court allowed the 482 application and quashed the summoning order including the entire proceedings initiated thereafter.

Case title - Dr. Mohd. Ibrahim And Ors. v. State Of U.P. And Ors.

Case citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 34