Tumgik
#Capacitor vs Resistor
indeenterprises · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
Smart Tweezers ST5S vs. Conventional Multimeter: A Smarter Choice
Smart Tweezers ST5S and conventional multimeters are both essential tools for electronic testing and troubleshooting. However, they differ significantly in terms of functionality and ease of use.
Smart Tweezers ST5S:
All-in-One Design: Smart Tweezers combine a set of high-precision SMD probes and a digital multimeter into a single handheld device. This streamlined design simplifies testing and eliminates the need for separate probes and multimeters.
Automatic Component Identification: One of the standout features of Smart Tweezers is their ability to automatically identify and evaluate SMD components. This saves time and reduces the risk of human error. The device can recognize resistors, capacitors, and inductors.
Ergonomic and Portable: Smart Tweezers are easy to handle and operate with one hand. Their lightweight and ergonomic design make them a preferred choice for professionals and hobbyists alike.
Real-Time Measurement: These tweezers provide real-time measurements, allowing users to monitor changes in component values as they troubleshoot. There's no need to disconnect and reconnect probes repeatedly.
LCD Display: Smart Tweezers feature a clear LCD display that shows component values and measurement results. It's easy to read and interpret, even in low-light conditions.
Conventional Multimeter:
Multiple Components: A conventional multimeter typically consists of separate probes and a central unit. It can measure a wide range of electrical parameters, including voltage, current, resistance, capacitance, and more.
Manual Range Selection: Conventional multimeters often require users to manually select the appropriate measurement range and function. This can be time-consuming, especially when testing various components.
Limited SMD Testing: While multimeters are versatile, they are less suitable for testing surface mount devices (SMDs) without the use of additional adapters or fixtures. This can add complexity to SMD troubleshooting.
Complex Readings: Interpreting multimeter readings can be challenging, especially for beginners. Users must understand the correct units, ranges, and measurement modes.
In summary, Smart Tweezers ST5S are a specialized tool tailored for SMD component testing, offering automatic identification and real-time measurements in a compact and user-friendly form. They are ideal for users who frequently work with SMDs. On the other hand, conventional multimeters are versatile devices suitable for a wide range of electrical measurements but may require additional tools for SMD testing.
The choice between the two depends on your specific needs and the types of components you regularly work with.
Quotation & Enquiries:
Contacts: Rajiv & Romesh Cellphones: 9316134502 & 8283820745 Email: [email protected] Alternative Email: [email protected]
2 notes · View notes
lorryelectronicblog · 3 months
Text
Applications of Microprocessors vs Integrated Circuits
Introduction
Microprocessors and integrated circuits (ICs) are fundamental components in modern electronics, powering a vast array of devices and systems. Although they are often mentioned together, they serve different roles and have distinct applications. In this article, we'll explore the unique applications of microprocessors and integrated circuits, highlighting how each contributes to the technology landscape.
Understanding Microprocessors
A microprocessor is an integrated circuit that performs the functions of a computer's central processing unit (CPU). It executes instructions from software programs, handling arithmetic, logic, control, and input/output (I/O) operations. Microprocessors are the brains of many computing devices, making them critical for processing tasks.
Understanding Integrated Circuits
Integrated circuits (ICs) are semiconductor devices that contain multiple electronic components, such as transistors, resistors, and capacitors, all integrated into a single chip. ICs can perform a variety of functions, from simple amplifying signals to complex processing tasks, depending on their design and purpose.
Microprocessor Applications
1. Personal Computers and Laptops
Microprocessors are the heart of personal computers (PCs) and laptops, enabling them to run complex operating systems and software applications. Intel's Core and AMD's Ryzen series are prime examples of microprocessors used in PCs.
2. Servers and Data Centers
In servers and data centers, microprocessors handle massive amounts of data and perform complex computations. They power the infrastructure behind cloud services, internet services, and large-scale databases.
3. Mobile Devices
Smartphones and tablets rely on microprocessors to run mobile operating systems and apps. Processors like Apple's A-series and Qualcomm's Snapdragon series are designed for high performance and efficiency in mobile devices.
4. Embedded Systems
Microprocessors are used in embedded systems found in consumer electronics, automotive control systems, and industrial machines. These systems perform dedicated functions within larger systems, such as controlling airbag deployment in cars or managing industrial robots.
5. Gaming Consoles
Gaming consoles, such as the PlayStation and Xbox, use powerful microprocessors to deliver high-quality graphics and immersive gaming experiences. These processors handle complex game physics, rendering, and AI computations.
Integrated Circuit Applications
1. Consumer Electronics
Integrated circuits are essential in consumer electronics, including televisions, audio systems, and home appliances. They manage various functions, such as signal processing, power management, and user interfaces.
2. Industrial Automation
In industrial automation, ICs control machinery, robotics, and process automation systems. They ensure precise control and monitoring of industrial processes, enhancing efficiency and safety.
3. Automotive Systems
ICs are crucial in automotive systems for functions like engine control, infotainment systems, and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). They improve vehicle performance, safety, and user experience.
4. Telecommunications
Telecommunication devices, such as smartphones, routers, and satellite communication systems, rely on ICs for signal processing, data transmission, and network management. They enable high-speed communication and connectivity.
5. Medical Devices
Medical devices, including diagnostic equipment, patient monitors, and implantable devices, use ICs for accurate measurement, data processing, and control functions. They enhance the reliability and functionality of medical technology.
6. Aerospace and Defense
ICs are used in aerospace and defense applications for navigation systems, communication equipment, and missile guidance systems. They offer high reliability and performance in critical and demanding environments.
Choosing the Right Component
When selecting between microprocessors and integrated circuits, consider the specific requirements of your application. Microprocessors are ideal for general-purpose computing and complex processing tasks, while ICs are suited for specialized functions and integrated solutions. Evaluate factors such as performance, power consumption, cost, and design complexity to make an informed decision.
Conclusion
Microprocessors and integrated circuits are indispensable in modern technology, each serving unique roles in various applications. Understanding their differences and applications can help you choose the right component for your projects, ensuring optimal performance and functionality.
0 notes
aeliyamarinetech · 1 year
Text
Passive vs. Active Components: Understanding Their Roles in Circuits
Sure, here is a summary of the key differences between passive and active components in circuits:
Passive components do not require an external power source to operate. They can only absorb power from the circuit. Passive components are used to control the flow of current, to store energy, or to convert energy from one form to another. Some examples of passive components are resistors, capacitors, and inductors.
Active components require an external power source to operate. They can amplify signals, generate signals, or control the flow of current. Active components are used in a wide variety of electronic devices, such as amplifiers, oscillators, and filters. Some examples of active components are transistors, diodes, and integrated circuits (ICs).
Here is a table summarizing the key differences between passive and active components:
The following are some of the roles that passive and active components play in circuits:
Passive components are often used to control the flow of current in a circuit. For example, resistors are used to limit the current flow, and capacitors are used to block direct current (DC) and allow alternating current (AC) to pass through.
Passive components can also be used to store energy. For example, capacitors can store electrical energy in the form of an electric field, and inductors can store electrical energy in the form of a magnetic field.
Active components are often used to amplify signals. For example, transistors can be used to amplify both the voltage and current of a signal.
Active components can also be used to generate signals. For example, oscillators can be used to generate periodic signals, such as sine waves and square waves.
Active components can also be used to control the flow of current in a circuit. For example, transistors can be used to switch a circuit on or off.
Passive and active components are essential building blocks of electronic circuits. They play different roles in circuits, but they are both essential for the operation of electronic devices.
0 notes
precisionlogictech · 5 years
Link
XC2VP20-5FF896I-XC2VP2-1FFG672C | in Stock Xilinx Obsolete Xilinx price & delivery Call 516-826-6200
XC2VP21FF672C-XC2VP20-5FF896C
Xilinx Distributor Call us 516-826-6200
XC2VP20-5FF896I-XC2VP2-1FFG672C
Precision Logic is a leading obsolete Xilinx distributor. We are an ISO 9001:2015 Certified Xilinx components Supplier. Find Obsolete Xilinx Parts in stock. Call 516-826-6200 Buy obsolete Xilinx parts. We supply a large variety of Xilinx electronic components. Precision Logic is a stocking Xilinx Distributor find obsolete, allocated, long lead-time parts, Hard to find, (E.O.L) End of life, last time buys, and discontinued electronic components. We have inventory and world wide sourcing for difficult parts. We have access to thousands of Xilinx parts and offer same day shipping on stock items. Precision Logic is a registered ISO 9001:2015 Certified Supplier with over 25 years in the electronic supply-chain.
We supply IC's-integrated circuits, Semiconductors, Switches, Relays, Memory, Modules, Connectors, Spacers, Diodes, Transistors, Capacitors, Resistors, Oscillators, Micro Circuits, micro-controllers, Military, Mil Spec Parts, just to name a few.
Request a Quote Here  online pricing Via Email or
Call 516-826-6200 for immediate price and delivery.
Whether you need 1-100,000 pcs. We can help!
The Best Distributor for Obsolete XC2VP20-5FF896I-XC2VP2-1FFG672C
XC2VP20-5FF896I XC2VP20-5FFG1152C XC2VP20-5FFG1152I XC2VP20-5FFG676C XC2VP20-5FFG676I XC2VP20-5FFG796C XC2VP20-5FFG896C XC2VP20-5FFG896C Lead Free XC2VP20-5FFG896CES XC2VP20-5FFG896I XC2VP20-5FFR1152C XC2VP20-5FG6761 XC2VP20-5FG676C XC2VP20-5FG676C0750 XC2VP20-5FG676C078 XC2VP20-5FG676C0788 XC2VP20-5FG676C0924 XC2VP20-5FG676C0939 XC2VP20-5FG676I XC2VP20-5FG676I0939 XC2VP20-5FG896C XC2VP20-5FGG676C XC2VP20-5FGG676I XC2VP20-5FGG76C XC2VP20-66FG896 XC2VP20-6BF957CES-VS XC2VP20-6F1152I XC2VP20-6F896C XC2VP20-6FF1>>> XC2VP20-6FF11>> XC2VP20-6FF1152 XC2VP20-6FF1152C XC2VP20-6FF1152C-ES XC2VP20-6FF1152CES XC2VP20-6FF1152CES VS XC2VP20-6FF1152I XC2VP20-6FF152C-ES XC2VP20-6FF52C-ES XC2VP20-6FF52CES-VS XC2VP20-6FF676C XC2VP20-6FF676I XC2VP20-6FF896 XC2VP20-6FF896C XC2VP20-6FF896C ES XC2VP20-6FF896C0924 XC2VP20-6FF896CES XC2VP20-6FF896CES VS XC2VP20-6FF896CESA XC2VP20-6FF896CR01 XC2VP20-6FF896I XC2VP20-6FFG1152C XC2VP20-6FFG1152I XC2VP20-6FFG676C XC2VP20-6FFG676I XC2VP20-6FFG896C XC2VP20-6FFG896I XC2VP20-6FFR1152C XC2VP20-6FG256C XC2VP20-6FG676 XC2VP20-6FG676C XC2VP20-6FG676I XC2VP20-6FGG67 XC2VP20-6FGG676C XC2VP20-6FGG676I XC2VP20-7FF1152C XC2VP20-7FF1152I XC2VP20-7FF676C XC2VP20-7FF676I XC2VP20-7FF896C XC2VP20-7FF896I XC2VP20-7FFG1152C XC2VP20-7FFG1152I XC2VP20-7FFG676C XC2VP20-7FFG676I XC2VP20-7FFG896C XC2VP20-7FFG896I XC2VP20-7FG676C XC2VP20-7FG676I XC2VP20-7FGG676C XC2VP20-7FGG676I XC2VP20-8FF676C XC2VP20-8FF676I XC2VP20-FF1152 XC2VP2 XC2VP2-1FF672C XC2VP20-FF896-6C XC2VP2-1FF672I XC2VP20-FF896CGB XC2VP2-1FFG672C
Find Obsolete Xilinx partsXC2VP20-5FF896I-XC2VP2-1FFG672C
1 note · View note
Text
How Does a Rectifier Work?
Rectifier, device that converts alternating electric current into direct current. It may be an electron tube (either a vacuum or a gaseous type), vibrator, solid-state device, or mechanical device. Direct current is necessary for the operation of many devices such as laptop computers, televisions, and certain power tools.
If only one polarity of an alternating current is used to produce a pulsating direct current, the process is called half-wave rectification. When both polarities are used, producing a continuous train of pulses, the process is called full-wave rectification.
You may wonder how power lines send electric currents across long distances for different purposes. And there are different "types" of electricity. The electricity that powers electric railway systems may not be appropriate for household appliances like phones and television sets. Rectifiers help by converting between these different types of electricity.
Bridge Rectifier and Rectifier Diode
AC DC rectifier lets you convert from alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC). AC is current that switches between flowing backwards and forwards at regular intervals while DC flows in a single direction. They generally rely on a bridge rectifier or a rectifier diode.
All rectifiers use P-N junctions, semiconductor devices that let electric current flow in only a single direction from the formation of p-type semiconductors with n-type semiconductors. The "p" side has an excess of holes (locations where there are no electrons) so it is positively charged. The "n" side is negatively charged with electrons in their outer shells.
Many circuits with this technology are built with a bridge rectifier. Bridge rectifiers convert AC to DC using its system of diodes made of a semiconductor material in either a half wave method that rectifiers one direction of the AC signal or a full wave method that rectifies both directions of the input AC.
Semiconductors are materials that let current flow because they're made of metals like gallium or metalloids like silicon that are contaminated with materials like phosphorous as a means of controlling current. You can use a bridge rectifier for different applications for a wide range of currents.
Bridge rectifiers also have the advantage of outputting more voltage and power than other rectifiers. Despite these benefits, bridge rectifiers suffer from having to use four diodes with the extra diodes compared to other rectifiers, causing a voltage drop that decreases the output voltage.
Silicon and Germanium Diodes
Scientists and engineers generally use silicon more frequently than germanium in creating diodes. Silicon p-n junctions work more effectively at higher temperatures than germanium ones. Silicon semiconductors let electric current flow more easily and can be created with lower costs.
These diodes take advantage of the p-n junction to convert AC to DC as a sort of electric "switch" that lets current flow in either the forward or reverse direction based on the p-n junction direction. Forward biased diodes let current continue to flow while reverse biased diodes block it. This is what causes silicon diodes to have a forward voltage of about 0.7 volts so that they only lets current flow if it's more than volts. For germanium diodes, the forward voltage is 0.3 volts.
The anode terminal of a battery, electrode or other voltage source where oxidization occurs in a circuit, supplies the the holes to the cathode of a diode in forming the p-n junction. In contrast, the cathode of a voltage source, where reduction occurs, provides the electrons that are sent to the anode of the diode.
Half Wave Rectifier Circuit
You can study how half wave rectifiers are connected in circuits to understand how they work. Half wave rectifiers switch between being forward biased and reverse biased based on the positive or negative half cycle of the input AC wave. It sends this signal to a load resistor such that the current flowing through the resistor is proportional to voltage.
You can measure the voltage across the load resistor as the supply voltage Vs, which is equal to the output DC voltage Vout. The resistance associated with this voltage also depends on the diode of the circuit itself. Then, the rectifier circuit switches to being reverse biased in which it takes the negative half cycle of the input AC signal. In this case, no current flows through the diode or the circuit and the output voltage drops to 0. The output current is, then, unidirectional.
Full wave rectifiers, in contrast, use the entire cycle (with positive and negative half cycles) of the input AC signal. The four diodes in a full wave rectifier circuit are arranged such that, when the AC signal input is positive, the current flows across the diode from D1 to the load resistance and back to the AC source through D2. When the AC signal is negative, the current takes the D3-load-D4 path instead. The load resistance also outputs the DC voltage from the full wave rectifier.
The average voltage value of a full wave rectifier is twice that of a half wave rectifier, and the root mean squared voltage, a method of measuring AC voltage, of a full wave rectifier is √2 times that of a half wave rectifier.
Rectifier Components and Applications
Most of the electronic appliances in your household use AC, but some devices like laptops convert this current to DC before using it. Most laptops use a type of Switched Mode Power Supply (SMPS) that lets the output DC voltage more power for the size, cost and weight of the adapter.
SMPS work using a rectifier, oscillator and filter that control pulse width modulation (a method of reducing the power of an electric signal), voltage and current. The oscillator is an AC signal source from which you can determine amplitude of current and the direction it flows. The laptop's AC adapter then uses this to connect to the AC power source and converts the high AC voltage to low DC voltage, a form it can use to power itself, during charging.
Some rectifier systems also use a smoothing circuit or capacitor that lets them output a constant voltage, instead of one that varies over time. The electrolytic capacitor of smoothing capacitors can achieve capacitances between 10 to thousands of microfarads (μF). More capacitance is necessary for greater input voltage.
Other rectifiers make use of transformers which alter voltage using four-layered semiconductors known as thyristors alongside diodes. A silicon-controlled rectifier, another name for a thyristor, uses a cathode and an anode separated by a gate and its four layers to create two p-n junctions arranged one on top of the other.
Uses of Rectifier Systems
The types of rectifier systems vary across applications in which you need to alter voltage or current. In addition to the applications already discussed, rectifiers find use in soldering equipment, electric welding, AM radio signals, pulse generators, voltage multipliers and power supply circuits.
Soldering irons that are used to connect parts of electric circuits together use half wave rectifiers for a single direction of the input AC. Electric welding techniques that use bridge rectifier circuits are ideal candidates for providing supply steady, polarized DC voltage.
AM radio, which modulates amplitude, can use half wave rectifiers to detect changes in electric signal input. Pulse generating circuits, which generate rectangular pulses for digital circuits use half wave rectifiers for changing the input signal.
Rectifiers in power supply circuits convert AC to DC from different power supplies. This is useful as DC is generally sent across long distances before it is converted to AC for household electricity and electronic devices. These technologies make great use of the bridge rectifier that can handle the change in voltage.
Electric vehicles have lots in common with gasoline-powered cars—room for four-plus passengers, range of several hundred miles, good safety—plus that one big difference: recharging with a plug at versus refueling from a pump. We’ve all pumped gas and know it’s a five- to 10-minute process; we suspect recharging takes longer and we know there are far fewer charging stations than the 125,000 U.S. public gas stations.
Here’s what you need to know about buying, installing and using the right EV charger. The more you know, the clearer it becomes that the unique aspects of EVs aren’t automatic disqualifiers.
Clearing Up the Range-Anxiety Misconception
With a gas-engine car, most owners drive until it’s low on fuel because gas stations are everywhere and gassing up is a quick stop. But empty-to-full charging is not what EV owners do most of the time. They top off every night or two, and as long as the car is charged in the morning, charging time doesn’t matter and range anxiety isn’t an issue for daily driving. Some use public charging, which means you do have to wait on the car. But 80% of charging is done at home, according to the JD Power U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience (EVX) Home Charging Study
Range and charging time may be less of an issue if an EV is the second car. If an EV is the only car, for long summer or holiday trip, owners can do what owners of compact gasoline-powered sedans may do: Rent a midsize or larger SUV for that two-week vacation. Or find a hotel with on-site charging.
For those who charge at home, you need to have the right charging equipment, and the proper electrical supply.
With EV charging, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. Electric vehicles have different charging capabilities and requirements and every owner also has their own driving needs.
Here’s a look at key aspects of choosing the right charging equipment, installing it properly and best practices for using EV charging accessories at home.
Do You Need to Buy an EV Charger When One Comes Free?
Every electric car comes standard with a portable charger. (This thick cable that plugs into a wall outlet and the car counts as a charger.) However, every manufacturer provides a different unit, with varying levels of charging capabilities. In some cases, the same manufacturer provides different standard charging equipment depending on which of its EV offerings you purchase or lease.
EV charging connector types: what they are and how they compare
Moving to an EV from a petrol car is fairly straightforward. All the controls are in the same place, and the steering wheel hasn't changed into a large carrot or anything like that.
The thing that is different, however, is the fuel - and that means a new type of fueling connector. EV charging connector is broadly similar to a petrol hose - they're a pipe the electricity comes down - but there are three distinct types of charger, and they might need an adapter depending on what's fitted on your new electric car.
Those types are Rapid, which is the fastest. Fast, which is not the fastest. And Slow, which you probably get the idea about.
Mercedes EQC review: shows how good premium EVs can be
Volvo XC60 Recharge review: this PHEV is great for space, comfort and family
Polestar 2 review: all-electric performance, powered by Google
Charging comes in either AC (for home chargers) or DC, and the amount of energy is measured in kilowatts.
Rapid chargers always have captive cables, so no need to bring your own, but the other kinds may require you to bridge the gap between charger and car yourself - your EV will come with a set of cables and adapters to do just this.
The market has yet to coalesce around one type of plug, and it can be quite complicated working out what goes where. We're here to help, and these are the most common connectors used on electric cars.
GB/T Charging Connectors
China, which has the world's largest electric car fleet, has its own charging connection. GB/T charging connectors again comes in AC and DC variants, the former with seven pins, and the latter with nine. Its plugs are circular, with a flattened edge, and larger than other types.
Type1 / CCS1 Conenctors
CCS, or combined charging system, is a beautifully elegant solution for fast DC charging. These are the original plugs, either Type 1 or Type 2, to which two more pins are added at the bottom. In the case of DC charging, these two lower pins participate in the charging itself and from the upper part only the communication pin and the earth conductor, which provides the reference point for the protection systems, are used. These connectors can withstand power of up to 350 kW.
It is currently the most popular type of DC connector. Type1 / CCS1 conenctors are common in the United States, while Type 2 CCS is used in Europe. The European Parliament's efforts to allow only CCS 2 and other plugs to be phased out of Europe have not been successful, but this standard is still winning, mainly because the car has only one socket. When using the CHAdeMO connector, the car must always have two sockets.
CCS are not compatible with CHAdeMO and GB / T charging stations because they use different communication protocolsa, so special adapters are needed and they are not easy to obtain.
0 notes
foxbeer704 · 3 years
Text
Keyclick
Tumblr media
Keyclickdetector Cisco
Key Clicker Game
Keyboard Click Windows 10
Key Clicker Download
1000MP
Mods
Keying Improvement Mod by INRAD FT-1000MP Keying Improvement (Excerpt from Inrad Web Page) The MP keying rise time is 2.4 mS and fall time is 1.0 mS. The fall time is responsible for the somewhat wide signal, which the MP generates on CW. There are two points in the radio which can be used to improve the keying by slowing the voltage change over from receive to transmit and back. Three parts are added to the radio. Two go on the IF board and one goes on the RF board. They are small leaded parts which solder on the bottom side of the boards. Board drawings are supplied which show the part locations. The IF board is fairly easy to get at. The RF board is buried under the final amplifier and is somewhat difficult to get at. Estimated time to install is 1 hour.
Key Click Mod with pictures by W7HV Link to INRAD - Performance Enhancements Page
Key Click Information from INRAD
Keyclick: A new revolutionary state of the art design Tonewheel model '30, '50, '70, Alt. 3 String Bass: On/Off, Decay Control Harmonic Percussion: On/Off, Volume Soft/Normal, Decay Fast/Slow, Harmonic Percussion 2nd / 3rd Percussion Level and Percussion Decay Controls. Keyclick and NB modification of Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark-V Now we have to remove the bottom covers of the Mark-V and lift the IF-board (this is the board where the filters are mounted on). Only remove the necessary cables to lift the IF-board at its side (you will see this on the last photo).
Home | AF AMP to PC | Antenna | Cooling Fan | Dual Rec | IC-2 Adapter | Front End | KeyClick | KeyClick W8JI | NB Mod | RF Power
This site was last updated04/22/20
Click 'KeyClick100.exe' and download it to the appropriate folder. Double-click the downloaded file. Confirm that the file extraction destination is an option folder. When OK is clicked, the file is extracted. (If the same name file has already existed, it is overwritten.) Double-click the file that is extracted in folder to start installation.
There is no generic keyclick option within Windows 10. The traditional click was the switch in the keyboard itself so needed no artificial sound. Only touch screen keyboards have the option because there is no physical key movement.
It's great to see a manufacturer offer improved close-spaced SSB transmit performance! The MK V Yaesu reverses other modern radio's downward spiral of transmitter SSB IM performance. Yaesu included a class-A mode. Even without class A, the HV finals can be very clean when compared to other radios if the rig is kept out of ALC.
Keyclick is a Mac OS X preference pane that provides adjustable audio feedback for keystrokes, mouse clicks, scroll wheel movement, and trackpad gestures. Using Keyclick can improve the perception of keyboard responsiveness, or fill in the missing audio feedback when using tap-to-click or two finger scrolling on trackpad equiped computers.
Unfortunately Yaesu missed correcting two important flaws:
The noise blanker, like in other earlier Yaesu's, creates receiver IM distortion even when off
The transmitter has virtually no wave-shaping on CW, causing terrible keyclicks
Preliminary tests show very strong keyclicks +1kHz and -1kHz.
An early FT1000MK V tested here had 1mS rise and 2ms fall times with sharp edges.
Later FT1000MK V's, are slightly better on and look like this:
The very sharp falling edge is a particular problem in later FT1000MK V's.
What does a 1mS fall mean?
A CW signal is actually a 100% AM modulated signal. The fall (or rise) time makes up 1/2 the time required for a full rise and fall cycle.
If the time period of the fall is 1.04mS, the frequency of the modulation frequency is the reciprocal of the rise (or fall) time divided by 2.
1/.00105 = 952 952/2= 476 Hz. The lowest order sidebands possible at ANY keying speed are 476Hz away from the carrier, one above the carrier and one below the carrier. This means the narrowest possible bandwidth with a perfectly shaped raised sine wave envelope would be 952 Hz. Since the FT1000 MK V does not have a perfect raised sine waveform, the actual sidebands contain high levels of harmonics. This makes the bandwidth even wider. It is the really sharp turn-over on the edges that kills the bandwidth.
Radios almost always have a different bandwidth on make and break. This is because envelope shape is different on rise and fall.
A stock FT1000MK V from Europe sounds like this in the USA! Wav file link
Keyclick and Noise Blanker Mod for FT1000MP MK V
Since a portion of the keyclick mod requires accessing the same general area as the noise blanker, it would be prudent to fix the receiver and transmitter at the same time. This article offers a combined modification that patches both problems.
The NB Problem
The worse thing about the receiver in any of the FT1000 series radios (I'm sure this carries over to other Yaesu models ) is the noise blanker. The noise blanker, even when OFF, causes deterioration in the close-spaced IM performance of the FT1000MK V.
1.) All signals inside the wide roofing filter (70 MHz) BW of the MK V are applied to the IF input of the IF unit.
2.) They immediately go through a very good balanced mixer (Q2020 and Q2024 in push-pull). This mixer has very little distortion and very good strong signal handling.
3.) 70MHz signals are converted to 8.2MHz .
4.) The 8.2MHz signals reach the gate of Q2009 through C2043 (darkened line on schematic). This point precedes all narrow 8MHz IF filtering--allowing a rather wide swath of unwanted signals to reach the gate of Q2009 along with the desired signal.
5.) Q2009 is left operating even when the noise blanker is turned off and can have substantial gain depending on bias voltages at TP2001. Bias voltages at TP2001 can be varied by changing menu settings for NB gain, but even the lowest NB gain settings never fully turn off Q2009!
6.) Q2009 acts like a mixer, creating unwanted mixing products of desired and undesired signals. Accumulated level of all signals reaching the gate of Q2009 produce a large net voltage at the drain of Q2009. This voltage (and resulting net current) causes overload and distortion by driving Q2009 and 2010 into distortion.
7.) The unwanted distortion products feed right back down the same connection into the 8.2MHz IF.
These new IM products appear as 'phantom splatter' on SSB and ' phantom CW signals' on CW. On CW, they sound like random blips and bloops that aren't real Morse characters. We cannot actually hear the distortion on the frequency of strong signals. The IM products simply appear as artificial interference when we attempt to copy weaker signals within about 5-10kHz of two or more moderately strong signals.
Anything we do to increase IF or RF gain in front of this point will greatly increase unwanted noise blanker intermodulation products. This includes increasing 70MHz IF system gain.
The NB Mod
The NB mod is a simple effective mod. It improves close-spaced IM3 dynamic range about 10dB on average. In rare cases I have seen as much as 20dB change! Moving just one foil trace, a very simple manufacturing change, would have made the MK V receiver noticeably better in close-spaced performance. Fortunately this mod is fairly easy for owners.
The NB correction removes surface mount 220-ohm resistor (R2046) from the source of Q2009, replacing it with a 220 ohm leaded resistor connected between Q2009's source at C2027 and Q2016's (2SC4047) collector and the junction of R2049 (also a 220-ohm).
Keyclick Problem
Raised- sine rises and falls would provide the fastest possible CW speeds for a given bandwidth. With properly filtered rise and falls, we would hear little or no change or softness when listening on-frequency. Tuning off- frequency, clicks would quickly vanish.
If a 2 or 3 millisecond rise and fall is used for operation at very high CW speeds in a single-pole R/C filter (this radio uses a simple RC filter) a transmitter is almost guaranteed to interfere with less strong signals within 1kHz or so. Transmitters with fast rise and fall times should stay at least 1.5kHz away from operators working weak signals, especially when the CW transmitter has 1930-era transmitter CW shaping.
Rumors sine-shaped waveforms impact tone or readability of signals are false. Some people even claim clicks rolling off at some 'X-dB-per-octave rate' beyond a few hundred Hz are a necessary part of life. Such statements are misleading, likely being based on the incorrect assumption the receiver has very wide bandwidth and the transmitter is filtered through a single stage simple resistor-capacitor click filter.
If you want to hear the sound of proper shaping, listen to this click-free signal recording as I tune across the signal. Off- frequency (even a few hundred hertz), we hear no clicks at all. On- frequency the CW is 'hard' sounding, allowing copy to 60-WPM or more. When the tone disappears in the deeper receive filter's skirts, clicks also disappear.
In contrast, compare the MK V recording as I tune past the signal. This signal is from Europe on 40 meters!
There is a day-and-night difference off frequency between the no-click and loud-click signals. On-frequency both signals sound the same.
MK V clicks are caused by excessively fast rise and fall, and very poor shape of the rise and fall.
Unfortunately when we patch poor CW transmitter designs, we can not make perfect corrections. Without major modification we can not modulate the MK V ( or most other transceivers) with properly filtered (which also means perfectly shaped) rise and falls. This modification, like the MP and 1000D click mods, is a patch..not a perfect cure..but it is about 20dB better 1kHz away than doing nothing about the problem.
Patches Vs Cures
Because mods on existing radios are patches, the radio owner must make a choice. If the user operates speeds faster than 45 or 50 WPM, the rise and fall required for legal close- spaced operation may be less than ideal. This does not mean the ability to work weak signals at modest speeds (up to 30 WPM) would be compromised even the slightest amount. It means high- speed ops (speeds over 45-50 WPM) may find the CW slightly mushy when adequate for close-frequency operation.
Operators with stock MP MK V's should always try to operate at least 4kHz away from weak or moderate signal- level stations. Part 97 rules prohibiting keyclick emissions that interfere with adjacent frequency operations. The specific rule is 97.307(b) 'Emissions outside the necessary bandwidth must not cause splatter or keyclick interference to operations on adjacent frequencies.'
The Click Mod
The actual click mod requires changing two stages. The first stage modified is on the IF board. The IF mod slows the rise and fall of mixer transistors Q2033 and Q2038.
Note: This stage is easy to modify, and is located on the same board as the noise blanker. This allows the noise blanker to be corrected at the same time.
By itself, modification of the easy-to-reach IF board is NOT effective for substantially reducing clicks. A later stage on the RF board also has truncated rise-and-fall times with a very poor R/C edge-shaping system. This later stage continues to add clicks even after earlier stages are modified.
RF amplifier stage Q1001 has the fastest rise and fall in the RF section. Q1001 must have proper gate bias shaping and timing to reduce clicks to acceptable levels. Removing D1002 and altering components around Q1002 slightly reduced clicking, but I concluded any effort wasn't worth the result with bias rise and fall more rounded at Q1002.
As designed, Yaesu uses a square wave very rich in harmonics to drive a simple R/C filter. This poorly filtered square wave amplitude modulates the RF and IF sections. The poor basic filtering design, combined with non-linear amplitude response, requires great care in component selection. It also means we never will achieve the optimum bandwidth for any give rise and fall time and ultimate CW speed.
Making the Mod
This mod is a little more complex than the FT1000MP mod because the chassis of the MK V is a little more complex and unfriendly. Like any service work, having a clean open bench and a spot to separately store screws and other hardware removed in every step in order will make the job smooth and easy. If you do NOT want to modify your MK V, I can make the modification for a nominal fee. You can e-mail me at my [email protected]
Some may wish to remove and change surface mount components.. but I prefer to wire the click-mod to a single terminal strip. This will allow you to customize the mod, switch the mod in and out, or correct any errors without dismantling the entire radio.
You'll need the following parts:
(1) one foot each of two small insulated wires, #20-#26 one ( preferably) green and one blue to make connections
(1) four-lug (with ground) terminal strip
(3) .1uF 50 volt disc capacitors (C1-C3)
(1) 22k 1/8w fixed resistor (R2)
(1) 680k 1/8w fixed resistor (R1)
(1) 220-ohm 1/8w fixed resistor
Keyclickdetector Cisco
In addition you need a well-lit bench, along with some hand-tools such as soldering pencil and solder, screwdrivers, and cutters and strippers.
Populate the terminal strip as follows:
Clicks
1.) Remove top and bottom covers to gain access to internal circuitry.
2.) Remove the screws holding the IF board in place, and the minimal amount of plugs to allow flipping the IF board over. You should be able to flip the board over by removing only two ribbon cables and one shielded cable. Draw a roadmap of all plugs and cables that must be disconnected! This will help you remember where everything goes.
Attach one end of the blue wire to the ungrounded end of C2148. The the other end hangs loose for now.
1.) Locate and remove R2046 220 ohm surface mount.
Tumblr media
2.) Form the leads properly and solder a 220-ohm 1/8-watt leaded resistor to the Q2009/C2027 source and capacitor connection point
3.) Connect the other lead of this resistor to the junction of Q2016's collector and R2048.
4.) Reinstall the IF board with the flying lead exiting the closest edge of the PC board. The blue wire should just hang out the closest edge. Take care to avoid pinching any wires.
RF Board Mods (improves clicks only)
1.) Remove all hardware necessary to access the RF board. This includes the PA section and fan, both of which can flip over the case edge if a few wires are unplugged.
2.) Remove the RF board. You will have to remove a small shield panel and unplug some wiring. Be sure to remove ALL necessary screws, including black screws near the DIN jack on the back panel of the radio!
3.) Attach the green wire to the junction of C1004 and R1003/R1004 at the gate of Q1001. Photo artista oil apk.
4.) Route this wire up through any opening near the middle of the radio to an area near the IF board.
5.) Reinstall the RF board and all other hardware taking care to not pinch any wires, and to reconnect all unplugged wires in proper locations.
6.) Select a clear area on the IF board and mount the terminal strip under a convenient clear mounting screw area. (Note: I have simply heat shrunk the resistor capacitor network without using a terminal strip.)
7.) Connect the green wire (from RF board) to C3, and the blue wire from IF board to the junction of C1 and R1. R1 is a 680k resistor, and R2 is a 22k resistor
Decibel rating scale. (Example of heat shrunk construction below)
Reassemble, test the radio, and reinstall the covers.
The FT-1000 MK V has hidden transmit gain menus. They are accessed by pushing and holding FAST and LOCK while turning the POWER switch on. Both of my MK V's and every MK V serviced here has had the TX IF gain set too high. This causes first character clicks on CW and spits and splatter on SSB. Here is how to correct the IF gain to prevent ALC clipping on leading edges of CW and voice:
Press and hold FAST and LOCK before and during initial POWER on.
Press FAST and ENT at the same time. You are now in the MENU's and the display should say '0-1 GrPI-cH'.
Turn the VRF/MEM CH counter-clockwise to 9-2. The display should say 't iF - GA in' This is the transmit IF gain menu.
Turn the SUB VFO knob clockwise one position to ' t iF - 018'. This is the 1.8MHz transmit IF gain.
Press the ALC/COMP meter selector until the bar graph says 'ALC'. Set RF PWR knob to full power.
With the radio on CW and a 50 ohm dummy load connected, close the key and adjust the MAIN VFO-A knob until the ALC display is about 75-85% of full scale on the illuminated bar marked 'ALC'.
Press the next band button (3.5), make sure the radio is still on CW, and turn the SUB VFO-B knob clockwise one band to 't iF - 035'.
Again adjust MAIN VFO-A until ALC is at 75-85% of full scale.
Repeat this process through all bands.
Key Clicker Game
Most radios I have tested require a setting of 2 to 4 on TX IF gain, with 3 being the most common setting.
Keyboard Click Windows 10
This change will reduce SSB bandwidth and distortion. It will also reduce keyclicks and annoying thumps on the leading edge of each Morse character.
Screen capture pro. Capture ScreenShot Pro starts with Windows. Press the print screen key to take a screenshot. Select the area or Window you want to use in your screenshot. Modify the size, add borders and change the size of your screen capture. Capture Anything on Screen Thanks to the user-friendly interface, you are able to quickly access the features included in this program. Be it quick snapshot or easy screen recording, Apowersoft Screen Capture Pro allows you to utilize all of these through the stunning and reliable interface. Description Screen Recorder Pro can capture Screen, Webcam, Audio, Cursor. With this powerful tool, you can record anything on the screen including selected areas, applications, active windows, and more.
Key Clicker Download
Copyright W8JI 2004. No portion of this page can be copied or reused without permission.
Tumblr media
0 notes
enconengineers-blog · 4 years
Text
Active Harmonic Filter Vs Reliable Passive Installation
Active Harmonic Filter
Read this case study of the advantages and disadvantages of the active harmonic filter and how passive filter installation removes harmonics, voltage surges and improves PF. Besides, the active harmonic filter needs the support of a stable external power source for injecting phase opposite current harmonics to downstream loads. Its efficacy depends upon the stability of the connected external power source.
AHF design needs passive components like a capacitor and a resistor, but it can either do harmonic control or power factor correction to its 100% rating. In the case of both PF improvement and harmonic reduction, its capacity needs a derating to 50%. The active harmonic filter is a load in an electrical power system that generates anti harmonics at 180degree phase opposite. AHF has energy losses. Most OEM pdf catalogues declare the kWh losses at 3% under laboratory measurement.
Active Harmonic Filter does not eliminate downstream harmonic, electronic failure, equipment and relay tripping.
By design, it doesn't remove harmonics from downstream power line but by injecting anti-harmonic cancels it to prevent it from flowing into the upstream utility supply. Its application is to limit upstream grid harmonics within IEEE-519 norm. Whereas passive harmonic filter being a harmonic absorption type sucks up harmonics by short-circuiting it from the downstream load as well as upstream power system within its range. By doing so, it cleans up the circulating-harmonic from downstream loads which otherwise get absorbed in the downstream equipment and In turn, increase voltage harmonic distortion within the supply transformer. In a chain reaction, that otherwise would magnify the current harmonics extent of which depends upon the fault level of the load bus PCC. Thus, by design passive harmonic filter relieves all downstream loads by removing the circulating-harmonics that eliminate equipment failure, break-down and nuisance tripping on voltage fluctuation. It improves Protection Relay functioning - read it in another case study at Solar Power Inverter with Harmonic Filter.    
Active Harmonic Filter has energy losses. Series impedance causes VFD tripping. Why a drive-wise harmonic correction is not a good idea.
It requires real-power in kW for injecting phase-opposite harmonic current coming from the downstream non-linear load. That causes a minimum of 3% real energy losses in kWh term. Though OEM catalogue mention only about 3% energy loss, that's measured under an ideal condition. Energy-intensive industries employ hundreds of VFD drives within one transformer say 2000 KVA and operate in between 70 to 90% load factor. It requires higher impedance typically over 3% in series with VFD drive which injects further kW losses. Thus the 3% energy loss data may be valid for low-intensity load, but for higher load-factor and THDv, the total losses including in the high-value series impedance may go up to beyond 3%.
Some consultants prefer to have a drive-wise harmonic filter which is not a wise thing to do though in particular when the supply transformer has too many VFD drives. Active front end harmonic filters use high impedance upfront with its connected VFD drive.  Summarily, it magnifies power system impedance which in turn increases THDv, disturbs VFD operation making it susceptible to tripping for even a minor grid voltage fluctuation.
It has a known problem connecting with backup diesel generator (DG) if plant loads are high and need variable reactive power compensation. The active harmonic filter can't deliver that as it inherits only a fixed and limited design capacitor.  An extra Power Factor control panel is required.  A STATCOM to work in conjunction with it or the SATCOM to be inbuilt within it. Some AHF manufacturers use an additional external APFC capacitor bank or a detuned harmonic filter which they refer to as a hybrid harmonic filter. A detuned filter does not control harmonics. It uses a detuned reactor in series for the protection of capacitors and not for eliminating the load harmonics.    
Active Harmonic Filter - advantages
The active harmonic filter does not require to be custom built since it is mostly impedance independence except the designed capacitors and resistors.  It does not need any load specific frequency tuning.  Active harmonic filter manufacturers claim it can handle wideband harmonic frequencies. On the other hand, the passive harmonic filter needs extensive engineering efforts and are custom built with load specific design. However, it is also true that the actual-load never generates beyond a few harmonic frequency bands.  For example, computer, server and switch mode power supply (SMPS) loads produce 3rd and 9th harmonic currents to the extent of 75% and 15% respectively.  Six pulse drive loads produce 5th (60%), 7th (20%) and balance in 11th and 13th harmonic currents. 12-Pulse inverter loads generate 11th (50%), 13th (20%), 5th (20%) and balance in other frequency harmonic currents.
Active Harmonic Filter- disadvantages
Active Harmonic Filter has a known issue in handing high-intensity loads wherein THDv is above 10% and without a linear-load mix for which many OEM recommend not to use it. It also creates energy losses which vary from 3% for low-intensity loads and goes up to 7% for high-intensity loads and voltage distortions. Whereas passive filter being harmonic absorption type saves 3 to 5% real energy in kWh for moderately polluted harmonic loads.  When it comes to massively polluted harmonic load like in rolling mill drive with a fourth quadrant regeneration operation, induction furnace etc., it delivers an even higher percentage of energy saving. The same higher percentage energy saving is possible when the transformer or DG operates at a higher load factor typically in between 80 to 90% and with a very high THDv.
Active Harmonic Filter malfunctions when THDv is high and is used without a linear-load mix
It malfunctions while handling high-intensity power and harmonic pollution wherein the total voltage harmonic distortion (THDv) is above 10%. Many OEM recommends not to use it when THDv is more than 10%. While the higher THDv problem is universal, it has another issue when the load doesn’t mix with some linear-load like full speed induction motor and the current harmonic percentage is high. We have independently verified these features in the following two case studies which are detailed below.
Active Harmonic Filter
0 notes
targent · 7 years
Text
peter im predicting it now your midterm is gonna have voltage gradient based on e field vectors, insulating vs conducting material with gauss’ law with graphs of e field as a function of distance from center (i want to say sphere but maybe cylinder), and at least one circuit combining capacitors and resistors (maybe lightbulb brightness ranking) ohh dont forget probably a work problem putting charges in proximity to each other 
7 notes · View notes
industrialblog · 4 years
Text
Differences between active and passive electrical components
One factor that distinguishes electrical components is their Active and Passive. In this article, we will examine the Active and Passive electrical components and the application of each and the Difference Between Active and Passive Components Stay with us.
Active Components vs Passive Components
Active elements in the circuit are components that provide power or energy to the circuit by extracting the power from an external source.
Passive elements in a circuit are components that cannot produce energy in the circuit in which they are operated. However, they can store or consume the power present in the circuit.
Active component is equipment that can amplify the output signal of an electronic circuit in the amount more than in the input signal.
Passive components are tools that control or alter the output of an electronic circuit without playing an active function in their performance.To read more about the differences between Active and Passive Components
click here
Tumblr media
Active components include diodes, transistors, and inactive components include resistors, capacitors, and inductors.
Diode :
A diode is a two-terminal electronic component that conducts current primarily in one direction (asymmetric conductance); it has low (ideally zero) resistance in one direction, and high (ideally infinite) resistance in the other. A diode vacuum tube or thermionic diode is a vacuum tube with two electrodes, a heated cathode and a plate, in which electrons can flow in only one direction, from cathode to plate.
Resistor :
A resistor is a passive two-terminal electrical component that implements electrical resistance as a circuit element. In electronic circuits, resistors are used to reduce current flow, adjust signal levels, to divide voltages, bias active elements, and terminate transmission lines, among other uses. High-power resistors that can dissipate many watts of electrical power as heat, may be used as part of motor controls, in power distribution systems, or as test loads for generators. Fixed resistors have resistances that only change slightly with temperature, time or operating voltage. Variable resistors can be used to adjust circuit elements (such as a volume control or a lamp dimmer), or as sensing devices for heat, light, humidity, force, or chemical activity.Changing the electrical current applied to the material steers the flow of the current in different directions. So, at the flip of a switch, the new material goes from letting the electrons in an electrical current flow to blocking them, or forcing them to move in specific directions at particular times: From acting like a transistor to acting like a resistor, or even a diode or a rectifier.
Read more
Tumblr media
References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diode
https://www.linquip.com/blog/difference-between-active-and-passive-components/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistor
https://www.energy.gov/articles/transistors-resistors-and-back-again
0 notes
studying-late-blog · 4 years
Text
Radical Science Distribution
Radical Science Distribution:
Sam's Laser FAQ, Copyright © 1994-2020, Samuel M. Goldwasser, All Rights Reserved.
I may be contacted via the Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Email Links Page.
Table of Contents:
Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents Laser Diode Drive Requirements Alternatives - Diode Laser Modules, Laser Pointers Laser Pointers and Diode Laser Modules - The Low Stress Approach Power Regulators in Laser Pointers Laser Pointer with a Resistor for a Regulator Substituting Batteries in Laser Pointers Powering a Laser Pointer From an External Source Blinking Laser Pointer or Diode Laser Module? Integrated Circuits for Driving Laser Diodes Laser Diode Drive Chips Caution About Cheap Laser Diode Drivers Comments on Some Commercial Drivers and Detectors More on Laser Diode Characteristics and Drivers Comments on Driver Education for Laser Diode Driver Designers Variations in Laser Diode Monitor Photodiode Current Sensitivity Response Time of Laser Diode and Monitor Photodiode Power Changes With Collimating Optics Using an External Photodiode for Power Control Driving High Power Laser Diodes Testing Laser Diode Driver Circuits Sam's Laser Diode Test Supply 1 Testing with a Laser Diode Simulator Art's Laser Diode Simulator Very Basic Laser Diode Power Supplies Bare Bones Laser Diode Power Supply Battery Power for Laser Diodes Schematics of Laser Diode Power Supplies Toshiba Discrete Laser Diode Power Supply (TO-LD1) Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1) Laser Diode Power Supply 2 (RE-LD2) Laser Diode Power Supply 3 (RE-LD3) Laser Diode Power Supply 4 (RE-LD4) Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1) Modification of SG-LD1 for Common Cathode LD/PD (SG-LD2) K3PGP's Laser Diode Driver (K3-LD1) Viacheslav's Laser Diode Driver (VS-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 1 (LP-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 2 (LP-LD2) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 3 (LP-LD3) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 4 (LP-LD4) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 5 (LP-LD5) Laser Diode Driver from IR Laser Module 1 (ILM-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Red Laser Module 1 (RLM-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 1 (GLP-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 2 (GLP-LD2) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 3 (GLP-LD3) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 4 (GLP-LD4) Simple Laser Diode Power Supply EU38 Low Cost Constant Current Laser Diode Driver Super Simple Laser Diode and TEC Driver Constant Current Supply for High Power Laser Diodes Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver 1 (SG-DH1) Tim's High Power Laser Diode Driver (TO-LD1) Joshua's High Power Laser Diode Driver (JD-LD1) Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver Pulsed Laser Diode Drivers Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIP Laser Diode Driver Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIIP Laser Diode Driver A 1 MHz Analog Laser Modulator Based On LM317 Regulator Temperature Compensation For Laser Drivers Based On LM317 Regulators Parallel Laser Diode Driver 1 More Laser Diode Driver Schematics Communications Systems Using Diode Lasers Driver Enhancements to Provide Modulation Capability Diode Laser Based Line-of-Sight Communicators
Back to Sam's Laser FAQ Table of Contents. Back to Laser Diode Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Drive Requirements The following must be achieved to properly drive a laser diode and not ruin it in short order: Absolute current limiting. This includes immunity to power line transients as well as those that may occur during power-on and power-off cycling. The parameters of many electronic components like ICs are rarely specified during periods of changing input power. Special laser diode drive chips are available which meet these requirements but a common op-amp may not be suitable without extreme care in circuit design - if at all. Current regulation. Efficiency and optical power output of a laser diode goes up with decreasing temperature. This means that without optical feedback, a laser diode switched on and adjusted at room temperature will have reduced output once it warms up. Conversely, if the current is set up after the laser diode has warmed up, it will likely blow out the next time it is switched on at room temperature if there is no optical feedback based regulation. Note that the damage from improper drive is not only due to thermal effects (though overheating is also possible) but due to exceeding the maximum optical power density (E/M field gradients?) at one of the end facets (mirrors) - and thus the nearly instantaneous nature of the risk. The optical output of a laser diode also declines as it heats up. This is reversible as long as no actual thermal damage has taken place. However, facet damage due to exceeding the optical output specifications is permanent. The result may be an expensive LED or (possibly greatly) reduced laser emission.
I accidentally blew one visible laser diode by neglecting to monitor the current but it wasn't the sudden effect some people describe - the current really had to be cranked up well beyond the point where the brightness of the laser beam stopped increasing. It did indeed turn into a poor excuse for an LED. One data point and you can conclude the world. :-)
Another one was blown by assuming that a particular driver circuit would work over a range of input voltages when in fact it was supposed to be powered from a regulated source. At first the degradation in brightness appeared to be reversible. However, what was probably happening was that damage to the laser diode was occurring as soon as the brightness appeared to level off. The natural tendency was then to back off and approach this same point again. Not quite as bright? Crank up the current. Finally, once it is much too late, the realization sets in that it will *never* be quite as bright as it was originally - ever again. This one still lases but at about 1/10th of its former brightness.
If you then try to power this damaged laser diode with a driver circuit using optical feedback, further instantaneous damage will occur as the driver attempts to maintain the normal optical output - which is now impossible to achieve and only succeeds in totally frying the device as it increases the current in a futile attempt to compensate.
And a comment about the expensive Nichia violet laser diodes (see the section: Availability of Green, Blue, and Violet Laser Diodes). Physically, they look like ordinary laser diodes and except for a higher voltage drop, the driving characteristics are basically similar. However, I've heard that they are even more sensitive to EVERYTHING than their visible and IR cousins and will degrade or die more easily. Since the wavelength of these diodes (in the 400 to 420 nm range) is basically useless for applications requiring visibility, aside from the "being the first kid on your block" factor, I'd stay away from them until the price comes down dramatically! I suspect that the newest 430 to 445 nm Nichia diodes are equally tempermental.
Also see the section: How Sensitive are Laser Diodes, Really?.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Alternatives - Diode Laser Modules, Laser Pointers Laser Pointers and Diode Laser Modules - The Low Stress Approach Where what you really want is a working visible diode laser, a commercial laser pointer or diode laser module may be the best option. Both of these include the driver circuit and will run off of unregulated low voltage DC. While the cost may be somewhat higher than that of a bare laser diode, the much reduced risk of blowout and built-in optics may be well worth the added cost. It doesn't take too many fried laser diodes to make up this cost difference! Believe me, it can get to be really frustrating very quickly blowing expensive laser diodes especially if you don't really know why they failed. This will be particularly true where the specifications of the laser diode and/or driver circuit are not entirely known - as is often the case. Helium-neon lasers are much more forgiving!
Buy one that accepts an unregulated input voltage. Otherwise, you can still have problems even if you run the device from a regulated power supply. All laser pointers and most (but not all) modules will be of this type. However, if you get a deal that is too good to be true, corners may have been cut. A proper drive circuit will be more than a resistor and a couple of capacitors!
To confirm that the driver is regulating, start with an input near the bottom of the claimed voltage range and increase it slowly. The brightness of your laser diode should be rock solid. If it continues to increase even within the supposedly acceptable range of input voltage, something is wrong with either the laser diode (it is incompatible with the driver or damaged) or driver (it actually requires a regulated input or is incorrectly set up for the laser diode you are using). Stop right here and rectify the situation before you blow (yet another) laser diode!
See the chapter: Laser and Parts Sources for a number of suppliers of both diode laser pointers and diode laser modules.
If you still aren't convinced that someone else should deal with laser diode drive design issues, the remainder of this chapter provides suggestions for integrated drive chips, sample circuits, and complete power supply schematics. But don't complain that you haven't been warned of the sensitive nature of laser diodes.
Power Regulators in Laser Pointers The following four possibilities exist for the laser diode drivers inside laser pointers. (Unless otherwise noted, this applies to red laser pointers, not the DPSS green types with their high power laser diode pump requirements.) Series resistor: There is no active regulator. A resistor limits current to a safe value with a fresh set of batteries. The laser diode is driven like an LED. As the batteries are drained, current decreases proportional to the difference between the battery voltage and the diode drop (about 2 V) divided by the resistances. Since output power and thus brightness would also decline dramatically with battery use, this approach is only found in the cheapest of laser pointers. See the section: Laser Pointer with a Resistor for a Regulator. Constant current: Laser diode current is set to a safe value between threshold and maximum. This takes care of battery voltage variations but still would have problems with changes in the laser diode output with temperature. This is rarely, if ever, found on red laser pointers but is used for green laser pointers since the high power pump diodes for the DPSS laser module do not have or need optical feedback for adequate regulation. Optical feedback - unregulated reference: Some laser diode drivers use the monitor photodiode to control laser diode current but do not have constant voltage source like a zener diode circuit to use as a reference. This is fairly safe for the laser diode as long as the correct battery types are used. For these, output brightness will vary somewhat with battery voltage and will thus decline as the batteries are drained. Optical feedback - regulated reference: The best designs (and all those using IC driver chips) will maintain nearly constant output power until the batteries are nearly exhausted. I'd expect to only see (3) and (4) in modern red laser pointers with (4) predominating in more modern designs. Expect (2) in green DPSS laser pointers (but many or most of these will also be pulsed).
Laser Pointer with a Resistor for a Regulator Visible laser diodes generally have very precise drive requirements. Too little current and they don't lase; too much current and they quickly turn into poor imitations of LEDs or die entirely. At least that's true of most of them. In order for a simple resistor to set the current precisely enough, it would have to be selected for each laser diode to limit the current to a safe value with fresh batteries over the expected temperature range. With only 5 to 10 percent between lasing threshold and maximum current for a typical visible laser diode, this could be impossible. Until recently, I had heard that this type of design (or lack thereof) has been used but had never seen such a simple circuit in a laser pointer. Apparently, visible laser diodes are now mass produced with a much larger range of current between threshold and operating limits - possibly engineered specifically for the ultra-cheap laser pointer market. (From [email protected].)
Well, I have in my hands a laser pointer that has only a resistor to limit the current instead of the transistorized circuits usually found. It have a 51 ohm SMD type resistor on the PCB in series with the power switch, the laser diode, and 3 LR44 batteries (1.5 V each).
In fact, the laser diode has no monitor photodiode at all - it have only 2 terminals. The metal case is open on the rear, so one can easily see the laser diode itself inside it. Interesting enough is that it is the only type of laser pointer that I can actually now find here (Brazil), but some years ago I bought some pointers having a complete regulator circuit.
(From: Sam.)
He's has sent me a sample, all the way from Brazil! Heck, it arrived faster than some of the stuff I send next door. :) As advertised, it certainly appears not to have anything inside other than a laser diode chip on a heat sink, 51 ohm surface mount resistor, on-off switch, and battery.
I have measured the I-V curve for both the overall circuit and just the laser diode. It is consistent with a 51 ohm series resistor and 20 ohm diode resistance with about a 2 V drop at just above 0 mA (the knee of the diode I-V curve). The threshold is around 15 mA and the operating current is 35 mA at 4.5 V (the normal battery voltage) - a rather wide range for a visible edge emitting diode. My hypothesis is that these laser diodes are specifically designed to have a wide operating range - possibly by reducing the reflectance of the output facet and thus the gain, possibly by varying the doping, or something else. So, efficiency is lower but with the benefit of increased tolerance to power supply current variation (though 35 mA for a few mW of output power is a very respectable value).
Someone else sent me a similar pointer and while I haven't actually measured its I-V curve, I expect that it behaves basically the same. These are both bullet-style pointers of obviously really cheap construction that came with 5 screw-in pattern heads (1 clear and 4 HOEs). Another better quality bullet-style pointer I have uses the normal laser diode in a can package with a regulated driver.
I also bought a couple dozen as-is pointers in a single lot on eBay which are all of this type.
Substituting Batteries in Laser Pointers My general recommendation would be to avoid this if possible but I do agree that having to spend huge $$$$ for those silly button cells can get to be annoying. :) "My laser pointer requires those little button cells which are really expensive and hard to find. I was wondering if I can instead connect 2 wires and make a battery pack for it using 3 AA batteries. Do all pointers have power regulators?" They all have some sort of regulation but it may not be adequate to deal with much of a change. You would have to check circuit to be sure or use batteries that are exactly the same maximum voltage. Even that isn't totally guaranteed as really dreadful designs could depend on the internal resistance of the batteries to limit current. So, replacing AAA Alkalines with D Alkalines could cause problems with some designs.
To be reasonably safe, you would have to measure the current using a fresh set of the recommended button cells and then add enough series resistance to make sure the current can never exceed this value even with brand new AAs (or whatever you are using).
Note that the much more complex and expensive green laser pointers should have decent regulation but they may still assume that nicely behaved batteries are used. Therefore, if adding an external power source to one of these, it is best to make sure it is well filtered, regulated, and has absolutely no overshoot during power cycling. Also see the next section.
Powering a Laser Pointer From an External Source Unlike high quality and expensive diode laser modules, laser pointers may have less than stellar internal regulation. Thus, you could easily destroy them instantly by attaching an external power supply, wall adapter, or even a higher capacity battery of the same voltage as the one used originally. Some pointers may even depend on the internal voltage drop inside the recommended (internal) batteries to provide some of the current regulation! So, if you really want to run a pointer from an external source, the best thing to do would be to measure the voltage across a fresh set of batteries powering the pointer and build a highly filtered, well regulated power supply to match it. The power supply must have absolutely no overshoot or undershoot when power cycling.
Another not quite as robust alternative is to obtain a wall adapter with an adequate current rating and slightly higher voltage rating than the pointer's battery. Then, add series resistance until the voltage at the pointer is the same as when powered with its internal battery. This is risky, however, since unless the wall adapter is regulated (few are), ripple, line voltage fluctuations, and power surges will get through it - and any of these can fry a laser diode in next to zero time.
Also note that a fancy regulated power adapter may actually be deadly to a laser pointer. Power supplies that include active components (those using switchmode or linear regulators as opposed to simple wall adapters with only a transformer, rectifier, and filter capacitor) may produce sub-microsecond (or longer) overvoltage spikes when power cycled (at power-on or power-off). These will have no effect on most electronic equipment but may be fatal to laser diodes.
As far as connecting the power supply: If you don't mind drilling a hole in the case or end-cap, construct a dummy battery with contacts at each end which you wire to your external power supply. Drill a hole in the side of the case, or better yet in the cap (but off to one side so the cap will still make proper contact with the battery if you decide to use the pointer with a battery in the future) to allow the pair of wires to pass through after the cap is screwed on. There are all sorts of ways of doing this. The connections have to be made to the center spring contact on the circuit board at the bottom of the battery compartment and the case. Make sure you get the polarity correct!
Also see the section: Power Regulators in Laser Pointers.
Blinking Laser Pointer or Diode Laser Module? With the wide availability of inexpensive laser pointers in particular, it would be nice if there were a way to make them do something more exciting than just project a steady red dot. Typical questions go something like:
"Hi is there any way I can make my laser pointer blink at an adjustable rate, something that will turn on/of maybe with the control of a adjustable resistor? Are there any schematics or something to help me out?" In principle, a simple circuit based on a 555 timer, for example, could be used to control power to the pointer or module - perhaps even just control a relay to act as the on/off button. In practice, whether this will work or not depends on the design of your laser pointer or diode laser module. Some have significant filtering and delays circuits inside which will make blinking at a useful rate impossible. Others will work fine. Still others will fail due to the repeated stress of on/off cycles.
Going any deeper into the circuitry than the batteries/power supply or on/off switch is definitely not for the beginner - if possible at all. Unfortunately, however, that may be necessary to achieve a useful result. For more info, see the sections of this chapter on laser diode power requirements, modulation, and the sample laser diode driver schematics.
(From: Peter Pan ([email protected]).)
Yes! I've used a simple 555 timer circuit driving an emitter follower transistor buffer amp, to drive several laser pointers. I've had little trouble recovering a near square wave at the receiving end with a phototransistor driven amplifier, up to about 5 kHz. After that, the residual energy stored in the laser module's driver circuit starts to degrade the square wave, but this can usually be extended, at least through the remainder of the audio range, by using a push-pull or complementary-symmetry type buffer, instead of a simple emitter follower. If you need to go beyond 4 kHz though, it is better to attempt to modulate the intensity rather then try to accomplish complete shut down/turn on.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Integrated Circuits for Driving Laser Diodes Laser Diode Drive Chips Many semiconductor manufacturers offer laser driver chips. Some of these support high bit rate modulation in addition to providing the constant current optically stabilized power supply. Other types of chips including linear and switching regulators can be easily adapted to laser diode applications in many cases. However, some of these chips are designed in such a way that they will work only at the high bit rates advertised maintaining a continuous carrier at all times or with a 50 percent average duty cycle or something equally annoying if all you want is a CW laser diode power supply or even one for low bit rate communications. You need to check the specs very carefully for non-standard (e.g., not covered in the datasheet or app-note) applications. Note: Free samples of ICs like laser diode drivers may be available for the asking even if you won't be buying a million parts in the future. Manufacturers often provide some means of requesting free samples at their web sites. Just be honest about your needs - they consider it good PR and you might just tell a friend or colleague who WILL buy a million parts!
Analog Devices (http://www.analog.com/) has several laser diode drivers including the AD9660 which provides for full current control using the photodiode for feedback and permits high speed modulation between two power levels. Burr-Brown (http://www.burr-brown.com/). (From: Steve White ([email protected]).)
We are using the OPA 2662 (Burr-Brown) for this. It is an OTA with 370MHz BW, 59 mA/ns SR, and can source/sink 75mA of current per channel (two channels per chip which may be paralleled quite easily). The part provides the emitter of the current source to an external pin (programming side of an internal current mirror), so that a single resistor sets the voltage-current transfer characteristic. Watch out for the dependence of the harmonic distortion specs upon the supplied current and frequency though...if this will be a problem for your particular application that is (didn't matter much for mine).
Elantec (http://www.elantec.com) offerings include the EL6251C and EL6258C which provide laser diode driver and sense circuitry. They support high speed control of laser diode current with selectable levels for read and write, optical feedback regulation, and protection from low power supply or open input conditions. These parts are intended for CD, CD-R, CD-RW, and other optical data storage applications. Another chip, the EL6270C, features an integrated high frequency modulator (HFM) oscillator to provide output current drive of up to 100 mA, an external resistor that controls the average laser diode output power, and a low power disable mode that powers down to 5 uA.
Complete datasheets are available at the Elantec Web site.
(From: Alan Wolke ([email protected]).) Check out the datasheets for several laser driver circuits available on the market for high speed fiber communications. See Maxim, HP, Sony, Philips, Fujitsu, Microcosm, etc. Also, there are many papers in Bell System Technical Journals that deal with other bias control schemes that don't involve optical feedback.
iC-Haus Corporation (http://www.ichauscorp.com/) offers several CW laser diode driver and controller chips. The complete datasheets are available on-line and include functional block diagrams and application information. These devices require only a few common external components and can be used for CW and modulation/pulsed operation up to several hundred kHz (depending on model). iC-Haus parts are available through electronics distributors. In addition to other information, there is a new White Paper on the design and test of fast laser diode drivers at http://www.ichaus.biz/wp4_fastlaserdriver or http://www.ichaus.biz/upload/pdf/DesignTestFastLaserDriverWP4en.pdf. Linear Technology (http://www.linear.com/). App Note AN52 (and probably others) includes a sample circuit using their one of their chips (not necessary dedicated laser drivers) for powering laser diodes. In AN52, the LT1110 Micropower DC-DC converter is used as the current regulator for operating from a 1.5 V battery. However, it is possible that behavior at low battery voltages might be undefined - and bad for the laser diode! I wonder if they tested for that? :(
There is an article in the November CQ magazine by WA2NDM entitled, "A Laser Diode Transmitter" which is based on AN52. However, his circuit uses an audio transformer to directly modulate the laser diode current and it would seem that without some additional protection, if someone were to accidentally drop or tap on the microphone - or power cycle the preamp - poof goes the laser diode! :(
Laser Diode Power Supply 3 (RE-LD3) uses a similar chip - the LT1054 DC-DC Converter, not for voltage stepup but to very effectively isolate the laser diode from input voltage spikes.
Maxim (http://www.maxim-ic.com/). The MAX3261 (1.2 Gbps), MAX3667 and MAX3766 (622 Mbps), and MAX3263 (155 Mbps) are examples of their highly integrated laser driver chips.
The Maxim Engineering Journal (a monthly or so publication you will receive if you have requested their CDROM and possibly included in trade rags like EDN and Electronic Design) sometimes has laser diode related articles. For example, the Special Fiber Optic Edition (early 1999) is devoted to applications of Maxim's high speed (622 Mbps and up!) optical interface components including laser diode drivers and sensors. (The Maxim application note Driving a Laser diode at 622 Mbps From a Single +3.3V Power Supply may be one of those from this publication.) The next issue I received, Volume 33, included a circuit similar to the one described in Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver.
Both Sharp and Mitsubishi manufacture IC's for driving laser diodes. Most will maintain constant power. Some require two voltages, others just one. These circuits will drive the common cathode lasers, or the Sharp "P" or the Mitsubishi "R" configuration which has the laser's cathode connected the the anode of the photo diode. The Sharp IR3C07 is a good for CW or analog modulation, and the IR3C08 or IR3C09 will allow digital modulation to 10 MHz. These parts are quite inexpensive. Some additional manufacturers of laser diode driver chips and modules include (this not a complete list!): Applied Micro Circuits Corp. France Telecom Research and Development Fujitsu Compound Semiconductor, Inc. Intersil Laser Diode, Inc. Lucent Technologies, Inc., Microelectronics Division Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. NTT Electronics Corp. NVG, Inc. OKI Semiconductor, Inc. Rockwell Microelectronics, Inc. Vitesse Semiconductor Corp. Xicor, Inc. Caution About Cheap Laser Diode Drivers The bottom line is that these should be fine for CW laser lights and laser pointer type applications but NOT for modulation as may be claimed by the distributors of these modules. (From: Art Allen, KY1K ([email protected]).)
I called a person I know who works for a major surplus house. He asked NOT to be identified. He did give me valuable information regarding the NS102 laser driver modules that are being sold for $3 each (in large quantities) on the internet.
Here's what I was told.
The NS102 is mass produced in Asia. The chip that the NS102 PCB is based on is unknown, and probably made in Taiwan too. There are no specs for it. Only DC parameters are given on the 'rough spec' sheet (advertising quality literature) the sellers give you.
They do work and they work well.
They use low power and they are stable-if the voltage in changes from 4v to 8v, the LD output remains fairly constant.
(From: Sam.)
The following is apparently not quite correct. According to someone who works with NVG, they can be modulated at up to 2 MHz. See the section: Comments on Some Commercial Drivers and Detectors
(From: Art.)
However, they are NOT suitable for modulation of laser diodes and should only be used as a laser pen power supply!
I have an email from a vendor here which sparked all this speculation regarding their suitability for our purposes. The email CLAIMS they can be driven to 12 Mhz output pulses while maintaining FULL APC (not average output monitoring as they do in fiber optic drivers). As far as I can tell, this is just plain a lie and no one should purchase these expecting to modulate a laser diode for communications purposes.
They are probably little more than the standard 2 transistor laser driver that can be used for a laser pointer because it is heavily bypassed with a heavy duty slow start ramp up circuit.
Some vendors are now selling these for $20 in small quantities - don't get taken in - it's a laser pointer driver and NOTHING MORE.
If anyone has better info or has tested one of these on the bench, please let me know. I'd really like to get info on the chip contained on the PCB too.
Comments on Some Commercial Drivers and Detectors (Portions from: Martin Stone ([email protected]).) The following refers to chips available from NVG, Inc. and other resellers of their products. See the section: Mail Order - Lasers, Laser Parts, Optics, Accessories for more info on NVG.
The NVG laser driver circuit was originally designed for CW only. While I did not design the driver circuit, I was able to find a way to get it to modulate successfully up to 2 MHz. I have successfully built a free-space FM modulated data/voice transmission system using the NVG laser modules (diode, driver, collimator, enclosure) already set and burned in).
In addition I have helped a number of customers from around the world (Spain, Italy, Switzerland and the US) use the NVG modules in a modulated design.
While the NS102 type driver circuit does have a 0.1 uF capacitor to act as a 'soft on'/filter protection of the laser diode, by providing enough voltage to keep the module/laser just below the threshold, you can modulate the NVG modules (or any suitable diode attached to the NS102 driver) up to 2 MHz. At that point, it seems that the capacitor effectively filters the modulation and the circuit 'saturates' and only produces CW output.
Another strategy is to 'inverse' modulate the module - that is, keep the module effectively on with the modulation signal causing a decrease in power - rather than have the laser off with modulation causing an increase in signal....
See A Simple PLL Based FM Diode Laser Module Modulator for an example of one approach that works with the NS102.<
(From John Sojak ([email protected]).)
As far as modulation is concerned, the Analog Devices driver is hard to beat for three bucks. Couple that with a 555 and a battle proven LM317 front end and cry 'BINGO'. Maxim used PECL inputs ... arrgh! I don't need to spit photon packets at 150 mhz! Linear Tech IR receiver looks good, although the $7.00 price tag + a handful of linear doesn't really appeal to me. Too bad you can't get inside the Epoxy covered die in the Sharp TV/VCR consumer IR receiver modules (apx $1.50/100 pcs). Not everyone in the world wants to decode bursts of 40 kHz back into data!
Oh, by the way - an Optek BP812 Optologic sensor performs quite well at at 760 nm. It's an active device available in either totem pole or open collector outputs. The applications guy at Optek says the device won't work at 760 but looking at the response curve, I disagree. It's response is only down about 10% in the reds! Most silicon photo stuff is down about 60-75% at 760ish nm. From what I have seen, the device is very usable at 760 nm. Useful part for red diodes and HeNe stuff.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. More on Laser Diode Characteristics and Drivers Comments on Driver Education for Laser Diode Driver Designers (From: Jonathan Bromley ([email protected]).) This is getting a little scary. Laser diodes have been around for a good few years now, and I thought it was fairly widely known how you make them go and (harder) keep going for a long time; but there have been several postings recently from folk who are busy making themselves poorer by driving lasers inappropriately. Here are the rules on how you do it right:
Just because it isn't hot doesn't mean you didn't already fry it. Unlike most other things, running them at the "typical" data sheet values won't work. I'm not talking suboptimal here; I mean that it won't work, not even a little bit. You must never, never, never exceed the full rated *optical* power output of the laser, not even for a fraction of a microsecond. If you do, your laser will be degraded or dead. This means LOTS of careful design to avoid nasty switch-on and switch-off transients, for example. Use the built-in monitor photodiode to regulate the light output. This monitor diode looks at the leaked light from the back facet of the laser (a few percent of the useful front-facet output). The current through it is nicely proportional to light output, if you have a reasonable reverse bias voltage on it. Anything from 2V to 15V reverse bias is usually OK (on the photodiode; *never* reverse bias a laser diode!) The basic problem comes from the characteristics of the laser device. They are a bit like LEDs, so you will see a forward voltage of about 2.2V for almost any reasonable forward current (just like an LED, but the voltage is somewhat higher). Voltage drive is therefore an exceedingly bad idea. Current drive is a bit more predictable. Up to a certain current - the laser threshold current - you will get the device acting like a feeble LED. Above the threshold current, laser operation starts properly and the light output rises very rapidly as a function of current. Something like this:
        ^ Light Output         |         |         |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -* ---- Maximum Rated Light Output         |                            *|         |                           *         |                          *  |         |                         *         |                        *    |         |                       *         |                      *      |        -|*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-------+--------------> Forward Current         |                     |       |                                 |       |<-- Maximum Current                               |                               |<-- Threshold Current
The snag is, the difference between threshold and maximum current is usually quite small; no more than 10% or 20% of the threshold. The threshold current varies greatly from one device to another (even within the same type number) and also varies with temperature. Result: setting a fixed current value is doomed to failure. For some lasers, and on some days, it will be under the threshold and no laser action will occur; on other days, it will be over the maximum current and your precious laser will turn into a useless LED (like the original posting in this thread). The only safe way is to use the monitor diode current to servo the light output. Even this isn't ideal because the monitor current is different for different lasers, but: It doesn't vary significantly with temperature; Many laser manufacturers give you a test sheet with each device stating the actual monitor current for full output; You can provide an adjustment anyway. But BE CAREFUL. Transient overdriving, even for very short times, can seriously damage the lasers. Transients commonly occur: because your feedback circuit rings (or worse. oscillates) so that the drive current occasionally exceeds the maximum. because of PSU on/off transients. because you have used a socket for the laser, and the photodiode connection is flaky: if it comes disconnected, your feedback circuit will think there isn't enough drive to the laser and will crank up the current to destruction level. because you are trying to modulate the laser brightness with some AC signal and either you overdo it, or the feedback circuit overshoots. because you have a pot. somewhere in the circuit to adjust for full output, and its wiper is noisy. Above all, remember that it is excessive light output that destroys lasers. The heating effect of the drive current is not a big problem except that it has the effect of pushing the threshold current down. Excessive light levels, on the other hand, can damage the tiny end mirrors of the lasing crystal. Sharp (one of the big suppliers of laser diodes) also make some nifty 8-pin drive chips that are pretty good if you don't need to modulate the laser rapidly. For modulation, consider setting the light output close to 50% of full output using a really slooooowww-responding feedback circuit, and then impressing a fixed-amplitude modulating current on the laser. This is OK because the gradient of the light/current graph is reasonably predictable for any given laser type, so it's possible to calculate a suitable safe modulating current from the data sheet.
Good luck to all - and don't forget the eye safety regulations.
(From: Paul Mathews ([email protected]).)
Laser diode structures are usually so small that damage thresholds are very low on every dimension. The general approach to protecting them is to series AND shunt filter (and/or clamp) supply voltages to limit the voltage compliance of current source driving circuits. Also, consider having some of the current limiting be by means of an actual resistor rather than just active circuitry. The parasitic capacitances in active driving circuitry can interact with dv/dt on supply lines to turn on the drive circuit (e.g., drain to gate capacitance with MOSFET drive), so the resistor limits current even when this happens. Using bypass capacitance local to the pulse current loop has the dual benefit of absorbing residual transients and avoiding any effects of upstream series filter components on speed.
(From: Mark W. Lund ([email protected]).
You can blow out the laser in nanoseconds if there is enough voltage and/or power in the pulse. Two methods: electrostatic discharge type damage which punches holes in the cavity; brief high power which damages the front facet.
Make sure that the power supply to the modulation circuit is filtered to prevent surges, isolate the signal circuit to prevent surges on the input line from getting to the laser.
There are an infinite number of ways to get a damaging pulse. Most common is the power supply. It helps to have a scope capable of capturing transients for this. The other ones that I will admit to: using a circuit that wasn't grounded to the metal optical table--brushing the table with one line of the circuit and oops; a commercial laser diode power supply that was clean until we used it in computer control mode when it sent out very fast (anhard to see) spikes; hooking the laser up backwards; using a power supply that had a big capacitor across the output which had enough charge in it to do damage; and forgetting to put a peltier cooled laser on a heat sink (the more current I gave the cooler the hotter the laser got....oops.)
Well, that was embarrassing, but I hope it encourages others to save a few (laser diode) lives.
(From: K. Meehan ([email protected]).)
Semiconductor lasers are very sensitive to power spikes. The level of current that is a problem depends on the laser structure and how much of the current is converted into optical power vs. heat. In general, reverse current spikes are very damaging, no matter what level. Make sure that you are modulating the diode so that you go below laser threshold but not below 0V. In the forward direction, very short overshoots (<1microseconds) in current can be handled until you blow the facet off of the device (catastrophic optical damage - COD). Longer pulse overshoots aren't any better. The current level that damage occurs varies from device to device. I tend to recommend less than 10% overshoot in all cases. COD is very easy to note, just look at the laser (while it is not operating) under a microscope. The facet coating is damaged near the emission region, if there is a coating. Otherwise, you will see an enhanced region (darker area) when looking under Nomarski - maybe not so easy to see.
Another problem that you might be having is spiking during start-up or shut-down of the device. Current supplies that look lovely during operation sometimes have spikes in the output when you turn them on or off. You might want to short the device, making sure that there is no bounce during the shorting, before turning your supply on or off. There are several laser diode driver companies out there that make current generators with slow starts and minimal overshoots. Avtech, Melles Griot, ILX Lightwave, WAvelength Electronics, etc.
Variations in Laser Diode Monitor Photodiode Current Sensitivity It would be nice if the monitor photodiodes associated with all laser diodes had the same sensitivity - or even were consistent for a given model. But, unfortunately, this is not the case. "I am designing a driver circuit for a laser diode (NEC NDL3220S). The problem is that the spec sheet says the output of the monitor photodiode at rated power is max: 0.5 ma, typical: 0.3 ma, min 0.1 ma, at 5 V. This is a huge range! If I set for 0.3 ma and the actual output is 0.1 mA I will burn out the laser. I do not have equipment for calibrating the laser output directly." (From: Alan Wolke ([email protected]).) Welcome to the wonderful world of laser diodes! You'll find that a 5:1 range in monitor current is typical, with even a full order of magnitude being common! This is one reason why most laser diode based applications have a provision for trimming/tuning the driver circuit to the particular laser.
Your safest bet is to design the feedback loop to operate with less than the minimum monitor current, and provide the ability to actively tune it to the appropriate operating point. Thankfully, the relationship between output power and monitor current will remain reasonably constant over the lifetime of each particular device. So, once it is properly set, you're done.
Response Time of Laser Diode and Monitor Photodiode (From: Derek Weston ([email protected]).) For those of us who have performed the infamous LD to LED (LD->DELD) conversion more often than we'd like, there's an interesting item mentioned near the end of the article: Visible-Laser Driver Has Digitally Controlled Power And Modulation regarding LD drivers. It points out two important characteristics of LDs:
The monitor photodiode is often slower than the LD, and The laser diode start time is greatly increased if the LD starts from zero rather than an LED-level current flow. Wish I'd seen this two years ago! (From: John, K3PGP ([email protected]).)
For high speed data and very high frequency RF subcarrier/video work I've always biased my laser diodes to 1/2 laser power then modulated them near 100%, much the same as a standard AM radio transmitter. This does result in a faster response time rather than cutting the LD completely off. It's also probably a bit easier on the laser diode especially if it's a high power unit. (Mine draws 1 amp when putting out 500 mw.)
I never tried biasing it down to BELOW laser threshold at the 'LED' level. Although this would be an improvement over cutting it off completely, I would think this would be slower than biasing to 1/2 laser power.
(From: Sam.)
Also see the section: Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver which has a bit more on the circuit mentioned above.
Power Changes With Collimating Optics When adding (or removing) external optics, reflections back into the laser diode itself must be taken into consideration. These can have two effects: Altering the amount of light hitting the monitor photodiode inside the laser diode package. This will change the power level setting if the APC (Automatic Power Control) circuit is being used (as it should be in most cases). Destabilizing the lasing process due to reflected light entering the laser cavity. This effect actually may be more common with low power laser diodes than one would think. See the section: Causes of Laser Pointer Output Power Changing When Directed at a Mirror. However, where the behavior is repeatable and stable, I'd be more inclined to believe it is the simpler explanation, above. Note that the losses in the optics are usually only a minor factor where the power decreases. Even uncoated surfaces reflect only about 4 percent so if you are getting a 30 percent decrease in power, this probably isn't the cause! CAUTION: If you remove the optics from a diode laser module, the power may increase resulting in laser diode destruction, especially if the unit is being run near its maximum ratings.
(From: Frank DeFreitas ([email protected]).)
The information sheet for a Power Techologies 35 mW module states in bold capital letters not to even ADJUST the collimation while the diode is running at full power!
I've got a little 10 mW, 635 nm diode that I tested with and without optics. Here are the initial readings:
Without Collimating Optics: 10.8 mW. With Collimating Optics: 10.5 mW. (I actually expected more of a drop here.) It is interesting to note that the second reading WITHOUT optics was 3.8 mW and the third reading 2.6 mW. The barrel was becoming very hot. I killed the power before I killed the diode (I'm learning!). So this particular diode (from NVG, Inc.) obviously was set up with the collimating optics in place NEEDS the feedback (reflection) for the photodiode to control the current.
Using an External Photodiode for Power Control There is no law that says the internal monitor photodiode must be used in the driver optical feedback circuit. For some applications, it is desirable to substitute an external one or use both together. This could be used to control beam power based on some mechanical condition like position or angle or to compensate for variations in the behavior of the external optics. You can't modify a sealed diode laser module in this manner unless it already has a modulation input but if you are building something from components, it should be possible. Loop stability must take into account optical path delays if the distance between the laser diode and photodiode is significant but this shouldn't be a problem unless you are also trying to modulate the thing at a very high rate. Obviously, any such scheme must assure that the external photodiode always intercepts enough of the beam and/or that a hard limit is imposed by feedback from the *internal* monitor photodiode to assure that the laser diode specifications are not exceeded under any conditions. Otherwise, even an errant dust particle or house fly wondering into the portion of the beam path used for feedback could ruin your laser diode!
Driving High Power Laser Diodes Laser diodes in the several hundred mW to multi-watt range which do not have internal monitor photodiodes have a different set of issues with respect to safe (for the laser diode, that is) drive circuits. The dire warnings about instant destruction from overcurrent still apply but but the extreme non-linearity typical of low power laser diodes isn't usually present with higher power devices. There is still a lasing threshold but above this, the output power increases linearly with current and there is likely to be decent consistency from unit to unit. However, proper current control and temperature compensation (or adequate derating) is still essential.
(From: Art Allen, KY1K ([email protected]).)
When you get into the 1 amp diodes (or anything over 200 or 300 mw), the driver becomes less dependent on the laser power feedback PD and many of these higher powered diodes just don't have the power sensing PD on-board for this reason.
While the threshold current is still very dependent on the temperature of the diode, the DIFFERENCE between the max current and the smoke release current widens a lot - meaning that the larger diodes can be operated fairly safely without sampling the output and applying variable current based on the power sensing PD.
The 1 watt diodes that I was trying to buy several years ago had 2 sets of specs-one at ambient room temperature and the other set for diodes at actual operating temperatures-the inference being that the preferred driver needed TEMPERATURE feedback in order to ramp the diode up to operating temperature.
Note that these diodes were used to drive fiber optic cables where they operate as an FM transmitter (constant carrier/fixed duty cycle transmit), so they probably used a time delay circuit to ramp them up to temperature rather than an actual temperature sensor.
Where the diode (probably) isn't on constantly, it might be necessary to derate the diodes and operate them just above threshold in order to be safe.
For your high power diodes, you can use a simple constant current driver (assuming the diode doesn't require PD based power sensing feedback.
The Vishay Siliconix catalog has an ABSOLUTELY O-U-T-S-T-A-N-D-I-N-G technical description of MOSFET based constant current source design. You can request the hard copy of the catalog from their website, make sure you get the full catalog with the ap notes. (I couldn't find this on the Vishay Web site but it may be: "AN103 - The FET Constant-Current Source/Limiter". Feeding "Vishay AN103" to a search engine should return the PDF.)
(From: John, K3PGP ([email protected]).)
I'm presently using the power supply under Biasing & Modulating Laser Diodes - Safely ! on my Web site with a Russian-made 1 watt 810 nm laser diode. The diode looks like one of those old time big metal (TO-3 ?) transistors but with a hole in the top of it. The series resistor in this case was made up out of a bunch of parallel connected 1 watt 33 ohm resistors. I think I ended up with around 10 to 12 in parallel. This allows me to adjust the laser current in small increments by adding or subtracting from the number of 33 ohm resistors. It also solved the problem of trying to find the exact value I needed in a high wattage resistor. (Wattage rating goes up as you parallel resistors, resistance goes down.)
I ended up feeding half of the 33 ohm resistors from one 7805 voltage regulator and the other half from a second 7805. Even though one 7805 can handle one amp of current it began to show signs of thermal drift when running at this level. By splitting the resistor bank in half each regulator only needs to supply 1/2 amp.
A 808 nm 500 mW laser diodes are visible but barely. Do NOT be fooled into thinking it's not really putting out much power. Human eyes aren't that sensitive to 800 nm radiation BUT you can easily burn a hole clean through your retina with this much power. If you doubt this, try focusing your 808 nm 500 mw laser on the black plastic part of a VHS video cassette and see what it does. When I do this with mine I get instant smoke and liquid plastic. So, BE CAREFUL especially when focusing this diode down to a small spot.
When playing around with stuff like this you will notice that color has a LOT to do with how much energy is absorbed. Aiming the same laser at the while label on the same cassette resulted in nothing happening. There is a very important principal to be learned by this experiment. If the white label isn't absorbing much power from the laser beam then it has to be going some place else. The answer of course is it's being reflected (scattered) back from the white surface. Keep this in mind when playing around with this diode. If you hit something that's even remotely reflective you could end up with the beam coming right back at you and you might not even be aware of it since the human eye is not very sensitive to radiation in the 800 nm region.
For communications use you might want to consider expanding the beam. This will lower the power density and make it a LOT safer if you accidentally get in the beam. The beam exiting mine is approx. 4 inches in diameter. 500 mw spread across a 4 inch diameter circle is a LOT less dangerous than 500 mw focused down to 1 mm in diameter!!!
And remember that a 500 mW 808 nm laser diode needs a GOOD heatsink. If you notice the power dropping off shortly after you turn the laser on your heatsink is too small! If you are having problems with this and you don't have room for a bigger heatsink use a small 12 VDC fan. Try to direct the air across the heatsink and NOT across the optics!
You can monitor power output with a regular silicon solar cell hooked directly to a milliamp meter (not a voltmeter!!!). Do NOT use any series resistor between the solar cell and meter. Expect to see over 100 ma of current at this power level. I also suggest you expand the beam to make use of most of the surface of the solar cell. If you focus it down to a small diameter the power density goes up and you just might burn a hole in the solar cell! Plus a very narrow diameter beam could easily bounce off the shiny surface of the solar cell and hit you in the eyes with enough power density to do some real damage! Watch the angle between the solar cell and the laser and anticipate where the reflection might fall. You will get the same power reading no matter what the beam diameter is as long as all the energy hits the solar cell. You can substitute a white piece of paper to get some idea of beam diameter but be CAREFUL when doing this!
Treat this laser with respect. Anticipate reflections. Keep people, animals and airplanes out of it's path and above all THINK before you turn it on!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Testing Laser Diode Driver Circuits Sam's Laser Diode Test Supply 1 This is a basic power supply using a pair IC regulators to provide a variable voltage with adjustable current limit. Rather than combining these functions a brute force regulator pair is used - one for the voltage and the other for the current limit. The idea is to be able to safely test laser diodes or complete drivers with the ability to limit current initially to a guaranteed safe value until circuit operation and/or laser diode behavior can be determined. This should substitute for an expensive lab supply for testing of lower power devices.
The circuit is shown in Sam's Laser Diode Test Supply 1 (SG-LT1). As drawn, it is suitable for laser diodes requiring between about 25 and 250 mA. With obvious changes to certain part values, the same circuit should be usable at up to an amp or more - but I won't be responsible for any destruction of expensive laser diodes that might result!
More modern lower dropout regulators like the LT1084 can be substituted for the LM317. For load currents above about 100 mA continuous, heat sinks will be required on the IC regulators.
The addition of a voltmeter might be desirable though the knob position of the voltage adjust pot corrected for the voltage drop of the current limit regulator will probably be good enough
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Very Basic Laser Diode Power Supplies Bare Bones Laser Diode Power Supply With care, a very basic power supply can be used to safely drive low and medium power laser diodes. The supply I have used to test diodes up to about 2 A is very basic consisting of a Variac, transformer, bridge rectifier, and filter capacitor with a current limiting resistor. For low power diodes, this is typically 50 to 250 ohms; for high power diodes, it is 8 ohms, 50 watt. A bleeder resistor assures that the filter capacitors discharge quickly once power is removed. A built in voltmeter shows the voltage into the current limiting resistor at all times. Using the equation: I=(V-2)/R (2 is the estimated voltage drop of the diode, R is the current limiting resistor) is often close enough. Adding a shorting relay which required a press of a button to re-enable when power is applied would further reduce the risk of accidentally overdriving the diode.
Since there is no active regulation, the output current has some 120 Hz ripple so the peak current may be slightly higher than the measured current. Installing a current meter (A or mA as appropriate) would be more precise but unless running near the maximum specifications of the diode, isn't really essential.
Battery Power for Laser Diodes Batteries are in fact a relatively safe alternative to sophisticated power supplies if their characteristics are well understood. Since a properly connected battery can never put out more than its rated voltage when new or fully charged, and can't produce reverse polarity, all that is needed is current limiting via a high power resistor. I would still recommend a 0.1 uF capacitor, 1N4148 reverse protection diode, and 100 ohm resistor directly across the diode though. Here are some guidelines:
A new or fully charged battery can have substantially more voltage than the nominal rating. For example, a new Alkaline is around 1.57 V, not 1.5 V. A NiCd may start out at 1.3 V or more when fully charged. Don't get too greedy and use a battery voltage close to the diode voltage, include a reasonable size current limiting resistor and use a higher battery voltage. The internal resistance of NiCd and NiMH batteries is quite low and should never be depended upon for a significant part of the current limiting. CAUTION: There must NOT be any filter capacitance in the power supply after the current limiting resistor. This is to minimize the chance that a bad connection to the diode will result in excessive current should such a capacitor charge to a much higher voltage and then discharge through the diode without current limiting.
It's fine to trickle charge a battery while it's being used since regardless of line voltage fluctuations and spikes, not much will happen to the battery voltage. However, due to the internal resistance of the battery, fast charging may not isolate the output enough. Better to implement a double buffering scheme where one battery is being charged while the other is in use, switching using a relay with an electrolytic capacitor to hold the voltage for the millisecond or so when the output is disconnected from either battery. The voltage of Alkaline batteries drops steadily as they are used while that of NiCd and NiMH batteries is nearly constant until they are fully discharged. Without an active regulator, this must be taken into account. To vary the current with no active components, a high power rheostat or selector switch must be used. Make sure it's wired so that intermittent contact can't result in current spikes. For example, to drive a typical IR laser diode, a pair of D-size Alkaline cells can be used in series with a power resistor. For a 1 W (rated) laser diode which has a threshold of 350 mA, voltage drop of 1.8 V, and slope efficiency of 0.8, an output power from near 0 mW to 1 W can be selected as follows:
  Resistor    Current     Pout --------------------------------     3  (1W)    400 mA     40 mW     2  (1W)    600 mA    200 mW   1.5  (2W)    800 mA    360 mW     1  (2W)   1200 mA    680 mW   0.75 (2W)   1600 mA   1000 mW Output power shown is approximate and depends on specific diode's threshold current and slope efficiency.
Double check polarity and take appropriate safety precautions!
Testing with a Laser Diode Simulator If you do build these or any other circuits for driving a laser diode, test them first with a combination of visible (or IR) LEDs and one or more silicon diodes (to simulate the approximate expected voltage drop) and a discrete photodiode to verify current limited operation. To accommodate the higher current of laser diodes compared to LEDs, use several identical LEDs in parallel with small balancing resistors to assure equal current sharing:
   COM o--------------+-------+-------+-------+---------+                     __|__   __|__   __|__   __|__      _|_               LEDs  _\_/_   _\_/_   _\_/_   _\_/_ ---> /_\ Photodiode                       |       |       |       |         |                       /       /       /       /         +----o PD                     5 \     5 \     5 \     5 \                       /       /       /       /                       \       \       \       \            1N4002     |       |       |       |     LD o-----|<|------+-------+-------+-------+
Note that the sensitivity of this photodiode to the LED emission will vary considerably depending on its position and orientation. Tape the photodiode and one of the LEDs together (sort of like a homemade opto-isolator) to stabilize and maximize the response. Where the laser diode current is below 20 or 30 mA, a suitable opto-coupler could also be used (see below).
Using this 'laser diode simulator', it will really only be possible to confirm that the laser driver current regulator is functional, not to actually set it up for your laser diode.
Once the circuit has been debugged, power down, and carefully install the laser diode. Double check all connections!
Use the guidelines below in both cases (written assuming an actual laser diode is being used):
Set the power adjustment of the laser driver to minimum (usually maximum resistance). If available, use a power supply with both voltage and current limit adjustments. Then, you can start with the voltage set to 0 and the current limit set just above the expected laser threshold current (plus the current drawn by the rest of the circuit - test with no laser diode in place). This can always be increased later. Attach a voltmeter between the photodiode (PD) terminal and ground. This will effectively monitor relative optical power output. If you have a (separate) current meter, put it in series with the power supply as well (or provide another means of measuring current).
CAUTION: Use clip leads. Leave the meters in place - do not attempt to change connections while the circuit is powered as this could result in a momentary current spike which may damage the laser diode.
Increase input voltage gradually. Once the laser diode starts lasing, the PD voltage should climb. The circuit should regulate when the PD voltage approaches the reference: 2.5 minus .7 V in circuits (1)-(3) or .5 Vcc for circuit (4). Then, the PD voltage and supply current should level off. If something doesn't behave as expected, shut down and determine why. Once you are confident that the circuit is operating properly with the laser diode installed, the output power can be increased modestly. But, without a laser power meter, DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK! For visible laser diodes, if you have a laser pointer or other visible diode laser module OF THE SAME WAVELENGTH, A-B brightness comparisons can be made if the beams are the same diameter. Otherwise, don't push your luck unless you have a bucketload of laser diodes you can afford to blow! For IR laser diodes, visible light eyeballs won't work. The tiny red dot that may be visible from an IR laser diode cannot be used as an accurate indication of power output. Laser diodes are generally NOT very forgiving. However, if you take your time and make sure you understand exactly what is happening at every step along the way, you and your laser diode will survive to light another day!
Art's Laser Diode Simulator (From: Art Allen, KY1K ([email protected]).) The Hewlett Packard HCPL4562 optocoupler appears excellent for incorporation into your laser diode simulator.
It is an LED optoisolator with a PD output stage. The PD is available by itself (without current amp transistor) or a moderate gain transistor is available (base/PD, emitter and collector)-so it's very flexible. The oveerall combination of LED, PD and output transistor has a 17 Mhz bandwidth rating.
My feeling was that the PD (standalone) should be used as we are trying to simulate a PD device itself that is normally inside the LD assy.
The goal is to be able to make the simulator have the same PD sensitivity as the actual LD/PD combination to be used. I think this is doable without adding a lot of complexity.
It should make a fairly nice little test jig! It could be made with a series pot to control LED current (until the proper drive level is available at the PD output). Several LED's could be switched in/out with a simple DIP switch, I'm thinking about a self powered flashing LED which could simulate a variable load for testing dynamic response at slow speeds-which could speak volumes about some driver circuits::>
A quick and dirty audio monitor on the LD current would be neat too-you wouldn't have to depend on your eyes to tell you if the drive becomes unstable or drifts up/down.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Schematics of Laser Diode Power Supplies The first five circuits are from published circuit diagrams or application notes, or were reverse engineered from actual devices. All use visible laser diodes though IR types would work with at most minor modifications to biasing points. Laser drivers (1) to (3) were from CW laser lights used for positioning in medical applications. Laser driver (4) was from a UPC bar code scanner.
Errors may have been made in the transcription. The type and specifications for the laser diode assembly (LD and PD) are unknown.
The available output power of these devices was probably limited to about 1 mW but the circuits should be suitable for the typical 3 to 5 mW maximum power visible laser diode (assuming the same polarity of LD and PD or with suitable modifications for different polarity units).
Of the 5 designs presented below, I would probably recommend "Laser diode power supply 2" as a simple but solid circuit for general use. It doesn't require any special chips or other hard to obtain parts. However, I would add a reverse polarity protection diode (e.g., 1N4002) in series with the positive input of the power supply.
In fact, funny that you should ask. :-)
An enhanced version of this design including a printed circuit board (PCB) layout is presented in the section: Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1).
A very basic and a high power laser diode drive circuit are also included (both open loop - no optical feedback) as well as one that can be programmed for 1024 levels of output intensity.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Toshiba Laser Diode Power Supply (TO-LD1) The actual laser driver portion of circuits (1) to (3) as well as the one presented in the section: Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1) is very similar to the basic design provided in a Toshiba application note named something like: "Example Driving Circuit for TOLD92xx Series Visible Laser Diodes". The Toshiba Laser Diode Driver Schematic was scanned from the application note by Kent C. Brodie ([email protected]) who also provides a Circuit Description. The schematic is reproduced in ASCII, below:
 Vcc o-----------+------------+-----------------------+--------+------+                  |            |                       |        |      |                  |            |    Power Adjust      _|_     __|__    |                  |            |       R2 10K      PD /_\  LD _\_/_    |                  |            \     +----+            |        |      |                  |         R1 /     |    |            |        |     _|_ C2                  |        610 \     +---/\/\--+-------+        /     --- 1uF                  |            /     |         |                \ R3   |                  |            |     |         |                / 15   |                +_|_           |     |       __|__              \      |             C1  ---           |     |     E /   \ C            |      |           22uF - |            +-----|------' Q1  '-------+     +------+                  |            |     |      2SA1015       |    C|                  |            |     |       (PNP)        |   |/ Q2                  |           _|_.   |                    +---|  2SC1959                  |      VR1 '/_\    |                    |   |\ (NPN)                  |     2.2V   |     |               C3 +_|_   E|                  |            |     |             10uF  ---    |                  |            |     |                  - |     |                  |            |     |                    |     |  Gnd o-----------+------------+-----+--------------------+-----+
This circuit lacks some of the protective features of the circuits, below, but is clearly the same core design.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1) This is the circuit from a Scanditronix "Diolase 1" laser line generator, a unit designed for patient positioning in medical diagnostic and treatment applications like radiation therapy. No, it doesn't actually engrave the patient but just projects a red line to aid in placing the patient on the couch and adjusting couch position in relation to semi-indelible ink marks drawn on the skin surface. It will run from a (wall adapter) power supply of about 6 to 9 VDC.
           D1  Vcc o-----|>|-------+-----------+-------------------+--------+-----+           1N4001     |           |                   |        |     |          Rev. Prot.  |           |    Pwr Adj       _|_     __|__  _|_ C4                      |           /   R3 10K (2)  PD /_\  LD _\_/_  --- .01uF                      |       R2  \     +----+        |        |     |                      |      560  /     |    |        |        |     |                      |           \     +---/\/\--+---+        +-----+                      |           |     |         |                  |                      |           |     |         +-------||---+     /                    +_|_          |     |       __|__   C2 (1) |     \ R4           ��     C1  ---          |     |     E /   \ C 100pF  |     / 3.9               10uF - |           +-----|------' Q1  '---------+     |                      |           |R    |    BC328-25 (5)      |    C|                      |       +---+     |       (PNP)          |   |/ Q2 (5)                      |       |  _|_.   |                      +---|  BD139                      |   VR1 +-'/_\    |                      |   |\ (NPN)                      |   LM431   |     |                 C3 +_|_   E|                      |   2.5V    |     |               10uF  ---    |                      |   (3)     |     |X                   - |     |            R1 3.9    |           |     |Y                     |     |  Gnd o------/\/\-----+-----------+-----+----------------------+-----+
Note the heavy capacitive filtering in this circuit. Changes would be needed to enable this circuit to be modulated at any reasonable rate. Notes:
Capacitor C4 value estimated. Potentiometer R3 measured at 6K. LM431 shunt regulator set up as 2.5 V reference. A 2.5 V zener or even a visible LED could also be used. Supply current measured at 150 mA (includes power on LED not shown). Transistor types do not appear to be critical.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 2 (RE-LD2) This is the circuit from a Scanditronix "Diolase 2" laser line generator, similar to the Diolase 1 described in the section: Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1) but containing a pair of diode laser modules, normally adjusted to produce a horizontal and vertical line. It appears to be an improved design including a soft-start (ramp-up) circuit and an inductor in series with the laser diode. Otherwise, it is virtually identical and will run from a 6 to 9 VDC source. Since both units were from the same company, I assume that these refinements were added as a result of reliability problems with the previous design - in fact, I have recently discovered that the unit from which I traced that schematic is not as bright as it should be!
Interestingly, there does not appear to be any reverse polarity protection on the input - I don't know why that would have been removed! C1 and Q1, at least, would likely let their smoke out if the power supply was connected backwards. But Jon Singer added it in his redrawn version, Laser Diode Power Supply Schematic 2 (RE-LD2), (if you don't like the ASCII schematic below!)
          2SC517 (NPN) (6) Vcc o----+--.  Q1 .---+---------+---------------+--------+----+-----+          |  _\___/_E  |         |               |        |    |     |          |     |      |         |              _|_     __|__  \ R5 _|_ C4       R1 \     |      |         |           PD /_\  LD _\_/_  / 1K --- .01uF     3.3K /     |      |         /               |        |    \     |  (2)          \     |      |     R2  \               |        |    |     |          |     |      |    390  /         R3    |        +----+-----+          |     |      |         \    +---/\/\---+--+                |          +-----+      |         |    |   2.2K      |                +                |      |         |    |             +----||----+      )                |    +_|_ C2     |    |           __|__ C3 (1) |      ) L1                |     --- 33uF   |    |   R4    E /   \  47pF  |      ) (3)                |    - |         +----|--/\/\----' Q2  '-------+     +                |      |         |R   |  220   BC328-25 (6)    |     |           C1 +_|_     |     +---+    \           (PNP)        |   |/ Q3 (6)          1uF  ---     |     |  _|_.  /<-+ R6                  +---|  BD139              - |      | VR1 +-'/_\   \  | 10K                 |   |\ (NPN)                |      | LM431   |    |  | Power Adjust   C5 +_|_   E|                |      | 2.5 V   |    +--+ (4)          10uF  ---    |                |      | (5)     |    |X                     - |     |                |      |         |    |Y                       |     | Gnd o----------+------+---------+----+------------------------+-----+
Q1 is for soft start. It's output should ramp up based on the time constant R1*C1,
Q2 is the feedback transistor and compares the reference voltage on VR1 with the voltage developed across R3+R6 by the monitor photodiode current.
Q3 is the LD driver.
Note the heavy capacitive filtering in this circuit. Changes would be needed to enable this circuit to be modulated at any reasonable rate.
Notes:
Capacitor C3 was marked n47 and very small, probably .47nF (470pF). Capacitor C4 was marked 10n and very small, probably 10nF (.01uF). Inductor marked Red-Black-Black-Silver, probably 20uH. Potentiometer R6 setting not measured. LM431 shunt regulator set up as 2.5V reference. A 2.5V zener or even a visible LED could also be used. Transistor types do not appear to be critical. This design is virtually identical to the circuitry found in typical laser pointers like the Laser Diode Driver from Radio Shack 63-1040 Laser Pointer reverse engineered by Walter Gray.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 3 (RE-LD3) This one runs off of a (wall adapter) power supply providing about 8 to 15 V. It was apparently designed by someone who was totally obsessed with protecting the laser diode from all outside influences - as one should be but there are limits. :-) This one goes to extremes as there are 5 levels of protection:
Input C-L-C filter. Soft start circuit (slow voltage ramp up). 7805 fixed voltage regulator. LT1054 DC-DC voltage converter. Optical power based current source. The first part of the circuit consists of the input filter, soft start circuit, voltage regulator, and DC-DC voltage converter. Its output should be s super clean, filtered, despiked, regulated, smoothed, massaged, source of -5 V ;-).
           L1               MPSA13           ::::     D1     C       E   I   +------+ O                   -5V out +12 o--+--^^^^--+--|>|--+--. Q1  .---+----| 7805 |---+------+               o        |        |1N4002 |  _\___/_   |    +-------   |      |            C5 |        |        |    R4 /     |      |      C|       |      |        +------+        |        |   10K \     |      |       |       |     8| 7  6  5|  180 |        |        |       /     |      |       |       |    +-+--+--+--+-+ uF |      +_|_ C10 +_|_ C11  |     |    +_|_ C8   |   C7 _|_   |            |16V |       --- 2.2  --- 2.2  +-----+     --- .22  |   .1 ---   |   LT1054   |  +_|_      - |  uF  - |  uF   |     |    - |  uF   |   uF  |    |            |   ---        |        |     +_|_   _|_     |       |       |    +-+--+--+--+-+  - |        |        |   C9 ---   --- C6  |       |       |     1  2| 3| 4|  C3  |        |   L2   | 4.7 - |     | .047 |       +-------+------------+--|--||--+        |  ::::  |  uF   |     |  uF  |       |              C4 |+  - |.01uF | Gnd o--+--^^^^--+-------------+------+-------+       180uF,16V +-|(--+------+
It was not possible to determine the values of L1 and L2 other than to measure their DC resistance - 4.3 ohms. The LT1054 (Linear Technology) is a 'Switched Capacitor Voltage Converter with Regulator' running at a 25 kHz switching frequency. A full datasheet is available at the Web site, above. The output of Q1 ramps up with a time constant of about 50 ms (R4 charging C9). This is then regulated by the 7805.
The LT1054 takes the regulated 5 V input and creates a regulated -5 V output. There is no obvious reason for using this part except the desire to isolate the laser diode as completely as possible from outside influences. Like the use of an Uninterruptible Power Source (UPS) to protect computer equipment from power surges, a DC-DC converter will similarly isolate the laser diode circuit from any noise or spikes on its input.
The second part of the circuit is virtually identical to that described in the section: Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1):
 Gnd o----------------+------------+------------------+-------+-----+                       |            |                  |       |     |                       |            |     Pwr Adj     _|_    __|__  _|_                       |            /      R2 20K  PD /_\ LD _\_/_  --- C2                       |         R1 \     +----+       |       |     |                       |        470 /     |    |       |       |     |                       |            \     +---/\/\--+--+       +-----+                       |            |     |         |                |                     +_|_           |     |       __|__              /                  C1  ---           |     |     E /   \ C            \ Rx                10uF - |            +-----|------' Q1  '-------+     /                       |            |R    |       PN2907       |    C|                       |            |     \       (PNP)        |   |/ Q2                       |           _|_.   / R3                 +---|  PN2222                       |      VR1 '/_\    \ 1K                 |   |\ (NPN)                       |      LM385 |     /               C1 +_|_   E|                       |      Z2.5  |     |             10uF  ---    |                       |            |     |X             16V - |     |                       |            |     |Y                   |     |  -5 V o---------------+------------+-----+--------------------+-----+
Note the heavy capacitive filtering in this circuit. Changes would be needed to enable this circuit to be modulated at any reasonable rate. I suspect that there are additional components inside the laser diode assembly itself (like the hypothetical Rx, probably a few ohms) but could not identify anything since it is totally potted.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 4 (RE-LD4) This more sophisticated (or at least more complicated) driver board uses a dual op-amp (LM358) chip instead of discrete parts to control a transistor current source. Due to the relative complexity of this design, and the fact that it is entirely constructed of itty-bitty surface mount parts, errors or omissions with respect to both transcription and interpretation are quite possible! Get the schematic for LDDRIVE in PDF format: LDDRIVE-SCH. The feedback loop consists of the photodiode (PD, part of D1), a non-inverting buffer (U2A), the inverting amp/low pass filter (U2B, R9, R11, C2, bandwidth of about 1 kHz), and emitter following current source (Q1, R13, R14, with a sensitivity of 36 mA/V) driving the laser diode (LD, part of D1).
Separate DC inputs are shown for the laser diode/photodiode itself (Vcc1) and the other circuitry (Vcc2). Vcc1 must be a regulated supply as there is no on-board voltage reference. It appears as though Vcc1 and Vcc2 should be set equal to one-another though there may have been (external) power sequencing in the original application. If Vcc1 is less than Vcc2 by more than a volt or so, the laser diode will be turned off. The input voltage range can be from 5 to 12 VDC though I would recommend running on 5 VDC if possible since this will minimize power consumption and heat dissipation in the current driver transistor and other circuitry. This is adequate for laser diodes with an operating current of up to about 80 mA. For laser diodes with an operating current greater than this, a slightly higher voltage will be required.
The set-point is at about 1/2 Vcc1 so that the laser diode optical output will be controlled to maintain photodiode current at: I(PD) = .5 Vcc1 / (R6||R7). Use this to determine the setting for R7 (SBT, Select By Test, Power Adjust) for the photodiode in your particular laser diode. Or replace R7 by a low noise variable resistor and use a laser power meter to set the operating current. (Hint: Start with the minimum current - maximum resistance).
Optical output will be linear with respect to Vcc1 and inversely proportional to R6||R7 as long as the laser diode is capable of producing the output power (and thus photodiode current) determined by the equation, above. Beyond the upper limit, the laser diode will likely be damaged instantly! Don't push your luck too far. :-)
For example, with Vcc1 = Vcc2 = 5 VDC, maximum laser diode current will be limited to about 90 mA. With R7 (SBT) equal to 5.9K, photodiode current will be .5 mA. For some laser diodes, this is approximately the value for 1 mW of optical beam power BUT YOURS MAY BE TOTALLY DIFFERENT!
If you then increase Vcc1 = Vcc2 to 10 V or halve the parallel combination of R6||R7, the output power will double or the laser diode will die in a futile attempt to achieve the impossible.
A cutoff circuit is provided to disable current to the laser diode as long as Vcc2 is more than about 1 V greater than Vcc1 or from an external input logic signal (ground J1-2 to disable). This consists of Q2, Q3, and their associated resistors. When Q2 is biased on, it turns on Q3 which shorts out the input to the main current driver, Q1.
The comparator (U1, LM311) would appear to output a signal based on photodiode current being above a threshold but its true purpose and function is not at all clear (or there is a mistake in the schematic).
As noted above, there is NO on-board voltage or current reference. Thus, Vcc1 must be a well regulated DC supply with low ripple and noise and NO power-on overshoot (especially if the laser diode is being run close to its optical power limit). However, this isn't quite as critical as driving the laser diode directly since optical output power (photodiode current) and not laser diode current is the controlled parameter. A power supply using an LM317 or 7805 type IC regulator with a large high quality filter capacitor on its output (e.g., 100uF, 16V, tantalum, in parallel with a .01uF ceramic) should be adequate.
Although the original version of this board uses surface mount devices, common through-hole equivalents are available for all parts and these are labeled on the schematic. Note: A heat sink is essential for (Q1) where Vcc1 is greater than 5 VDC - this part gets warm.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1) SG-LD1 is an enhanced version of the design described in the section: Laser Diode Power Supply 2 (RE-LD2) with the addition of bilevel (digital) modulation as described in the section: "Laser diode modulation". It should be capable of driving most typical small laser diodes including those found in CD players and CDROM and other optical drives, and visible laser diodes similar to those found in laser pointers, bar code scanners, medical positioning laser lights, and other similar devices. This design assumes a laser diode assembly where the laser diode anode and photodiode cathode are common (this seems to be the arrangement used most). If the opposite is true with your device (laser diode cathode and photodiode anode are common), reversing the direction of polarized components and power supply input, and changing NPN transistors to PNPs and vice-versa will permit the same PCB layout to be used. However, if your laser diode assembly has both anodes or cathodes in common, this circuit is not suitable unless an external photodiode is used for the optical feedback.
Disclaimer: The cicuit is currently under development so there may still be errors in the schematic and/or PCB artwork. I will not be responsible for any damage to your pocketbook or ego if for some reason your laser diodes do not survive. (This disclaimer may never go away!)
Get the schematic for SG-LD1 in PDF format: SG-LD1-SCH. In some cases, the part values listed should be considered as suggestions as many modifications are possible depending on your particular laser diode specifications and application needs. Transistors with heat sinks for Q2 and Q4 are advised if operating continuously near the upper end of the input voltage range (say above 10 V) and/or at laser diode currents of 100 mA or higher.
Input power (Vcc) can be anything in the range of about 10 to 15 VDC. It's not critical and will have no effect on the output power. A regulated supply isn't required.
Ebl should normally be left open. A switch closure (or open collector NPN transistor or open drain MOSFET) to Gnd shuts off the driver. Do NOT apply any active high signal to this input.
The monitor photodiode current at rated power will be in the specifications for the laser diode, usually with a rather wide range of sensitivity (10:1 or more). To start out, assume it's the minimum value and then if that doesn't result in enough output power (or any lasing at all with proper circuit operation confirmed), reduce the resistor values to obtain the desired output power. The reference point is a voltage of about 3.2 V on the base of Q1. For example, if the monitor photodiode current at full power is 0.5 mA, the total resistance would need to be about 6.4K ohms minimum. However, since the monitor photodiode sensitivity can vary widely, start with a high enough total resistance so that even worst case, the laser diode will be safe. Then, reduce the resistance once the behavior has been determined.
A positive voltage (3 to 15 V) applied to Mod turns on Q3 which shorts out R7 and increases the output power by an amount determined by the values of R4, R7, and the setting of R5. The specific resistance values must be selected based on the desired output power, modulation index, and monitor photodiode sensitivity.
CAUTION: As with all low power laser diodes, it is essential to use a laser power meter to determine the setting for maximum power.
A printed circuit board layout is also available. The entire single sided circuit board is 1.7" x 1.15" and includes modulation and enable inputs. It will run on an unregulated power supply of around 6 to 12 VDC.
The layout may be viewed as a GIF file (draft quality) as: sgld1pcb.gif.
A complete PCB artwork package for SG-LD1 may be downloaded in standard (full resolution 1:1) Gerber PCB format (zipped) as: sgld1grb.zip.
The Gerber files include the solder side copper, soldermask, top silkscreen, optional component side pads, and drill control artwork. The original printed circuit board CAD files and netlist (in Tango PCB format) are provided so that the circuit layout can be modified or imported to another system if desired. The text file 'sgld1.doc' (in sgld1grb.zip) describes the file contents in more detail.
I have a few bare (unpopulated) PCBs fabbed from this artwork available, as yet untested.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Modification of SG-LD1 for Common Cathode LD/PD (SG-LD2) While most laser diode packages have the configuration assumed by all the previous driver circuits, there are some that don't fit the mold. This section deals with one variation in particular - those with a common cathode connection. A simple modification to the basic SG-LD1 circuit (or any of the others that are similar) should permit these types of laser diodes to be safety driven.
Sam's Laser Diode Driver 2 shows the new circuit. The only changes are to the wiring of the laser diode package and the substitution of a zener diode (CR3) for R8. CR3 guarantees that the laser diode will not be driven should the voltage on the photodiode be insufficient for the feedback control to be active. At normal supply voltages, leaving R8 in as in SG-LD1 should work. The concern is that during power cycling or if run from a power supply voltage that is too low, the circuit could attempt to overdrive the laser diode thinking there is inadequate output power due to lack of bias on the photodiode and/or not enough voltage on the feedback components.
Sorry, no PCB layout available for this one. Modifications to the SG-LD1 PCB layout are left as an exercise for the student. :)
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. K3PGP's Laser Diode Driver (K3-LD1) This one runs open loop (no optical feedback) but has been designed to permit safe modulation. It should be fine as long as you don't try to run too close to the laser diode's maximum current/power rating. The circuit and an extensive description can be found at K3PGP's Experimenter's Corner under: Biasing and Modulating Laser Diodes - Safely!.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Viacheslav's Laser Diode Driver (VS-LD1) The circuit in Viacheslav's Laser Diode Driver (VS-LD1) is quite straightforward. I guess my main nit to pick would be that it uses more power than needed due to the constant current driver as opposed to a constant voltage source and a means of controlling the current via a pass transistor. But for a low power laser diode, this really isn't a major concern. There is enough filtering on the input that any transient conditions should not cause problems. (From: Viacheslav Slavinsky ([email protected]).)
I started with a constant current source using a LM317L (DA1) and R1. The current then branches to laser diode (through R5 for fine adjustment of division ratio and R6 for monitoring) to KT3 (LD anode). Another branch on VT1 is made to sink the extra current, the more the feedback, the more current sinks through the transistor. R2 regulates the reverse bias of the photodiode (it actually doesn't need to be 20K, but I picked from what I had in local store).
KT3 is the LD anode, KT4 is the PD cathode.
This circuit looks pretty stable (I can only judge by eye and voltage meter). For tests I used 2 metal-cased LED's and some unknown photodiode. Green LEDs could not impress the photodiode so I just used a laser pointer to check that feedback works. After I was sure that everything was all right, I set current to about 50 ma and plugged in the laser diode (Mitsubishi ML1016R, I = 80 mA). Then it was easy to set the nominal current and test the feedback a little against circumstances (unattaching it from heatsink for a few seconds, for example).
Actually before this circuit I assembled one similar to SG-LD1, just altered it to adopt Mitsubishi's pinout. But while testing it I felt like I'm not 100% sure how it works and I was very paranoid about LD sensitivity to everything and knew very little practical stuff, so I decided to make my own circuit. Yes, it indeed draws 120 mA where only 90 mA are used for good, there's room for improvements.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Red Laser Module 1 (RLM-LD1) This circuit was found in a 25 mW red laser diode module, model and manufacturerer unknown. It is almost an exact mirror image (with respect to polarities) of Toshiba Discrete Laser Diode Power Supply (TO-LD1). Note that the input voltage is negative.
 -Vcc o----------+------------+-----------------------+--------+------+                  |            |                       |        |      |                  |            |    Power Adjust     __|__     _|_     |                  |            |       R2 10K      PD_\_/_  LD /_\     |                  |            \     +----+            |        |      |                  |         R1 /     |    |            |        |     _|_ C2                  |        620 \     +---/\/\--+-------+        |     ---                  |            /     |         |                |      |                -_|_           |     |       __|__              |      |             C1  ---           |     |     E /   \ C            |      |           47uF + |            +-----|------' Q1  '-------+     +------+           6.3V   |            |     |        2FX         |    C|           Tant.  |            |     |       (NPN)        |   |/ Q2                  |           _|_    |                    +---|  1AM                  |       VR1 /_\    |                    |   |\ (PNP)                  |    2V LED  |     |                  -_|_   E|                  |            |     |              10uF ---    |                  |            |     |                  + |     |                  |            |     |                    |     |  Gnd o-----------+------------+-----+--------------------+-----+
Note the LED used in place of a zener. I confirmed that it actually does light up orange.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 1 (LP-LD1) (This circuit was reverse engineered by Jim Moss ([email protected]) who also provided the circuit analysis.) It is from a cheap laser pointer. Like the other discrete laser diode drivers, a single PNP transistor is used in the feedback loop to regulate laser diode current. However, although optical feedback of sorts is used, there appears to be no real reference. Thus, output power will depend on battery voltage, nominally 4.5 VDC (3 button cells, I assume) and the gain of Q2.
At first I thought some parts had been left out: At the very least, a zener or similar reference across C-E of Q2, and possibly some filter caps to keep the thing from oscillating. While was willing to believe that the design had the optical output depending on battery voltage, it seemed inconceivable for it to be directly affected by the gain of the driver transistor. However, I now believe that it is probably drawn correctly but the actual operating point is where the Q1 is almost in cutoff and its gain wouldn't be critical.
            Battery(+) o----------+----------+----------+ |Ild                                   |          |          | v                                  _|_         / R2     __|__                                  /_\ PD      \ 510    _\_/_ LD                                   |          /          |                                   | |Ipd     \ |I2      /                                   | v        | v        \ R3                                   |        |/ E         / 1.0                                   +--------| Q1 PNP     \                                   |        |\ C         |                                   / R1       |        |/ C                                   \ 120K     +--------| Q2 NPN                            S1     /         _|_       |\ E                           Power   \ |I1     /_\ D1      |                            _|_    | v        |          |            Battery(-) o----o o----+----------+----------+
For amusement, here is the analysis: Ipd = Output Power(mW) * X (where X is the sensitivity of the monitor photodiode in uA/mW). I1 is very nearly equal to lpd (minus Q1's base current). V(R1) = I1 * R1. V(R2) = V(Battery) - V(R1) - 0.7. I2 = V(R2)/R2. The operating point will depend slightly on the gain of both Q1 and Q2 but if the product ot their Hfes is high, for a given battery voltage, laser output power will be fairly constant.
You can crank the math for your favorite laser diode and transistor specs!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 2 (LP-LD2) This is the circuit from another inexpensive laser pointer. Although very similar, it includes some capacitive filtering (and more optional filtering in C2, not installed), as well as a power adjust pot (VR1). However, like the previous circuit, this does not have any absolute reference so power output will be dependent on the battery voltage to some extent. People have successfully modulated this module at a reasonable frequency (upper limit not determined) by removing or greatly reducing the value of the filter capacitor, C1. However, do this at your own risk! This unit was available from Oatley Electronics (AU) as the module LM-2 (January, 2000). Of course, they may have already switched to a different supplier or the manufacturer may have changed the design!
     Battery(+) o---------------+---------+------------+-------+                                 |         |            |       |                                _|_        / R2       __|__    _|_ C2                                /_\ PD     \ 510      _\_/_ LD --- (Opt)                                 |         /            |       |                                 | |Ipd    \ |I2   Ild| |       |                                 | v       | v        v +-------+                                 |         |            |                                 /       |/ E           |                             VR1 \<------| Q2 PNP       |                              5K /       |\ C           |                                 \         |          |/ C                                 |         +-----+----| Q1 NPN                                 |         |     |    |\ E                                 /         |     / R1   |                                 \ R3     _|_ C1 \ 10K  |                     S1          / 1K     ---    /      |                    Power        \         |     \ |I1  |                     _|_         |         |     | v    |     Battery(-) o----o o---------+---------+-----+------+
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 3 (LP-LD3) This one is even simpler than the two preceeding:
             Battery(+) o----------------------+--------+                                                |        |                                               _|_     __|__                                            PD /_\     _\_/_ LD                                                |        |                                           Ipd| |   Ild| |                                              v |      v |                                                |        |                                           R1   |      |/ E                                       +--/\/\--+------| Q1 PNP                                       |   1K          |\ C                                       /                 |                                   VR1 \<-+              |                             S1    10K /  |              |                            Power      \  |              |                             _|_       |  |              |             Battery(-) o----o o-------+--+--------------+
In this case, the power output is determined by the equation:             Vbatt - (Ipd  * (R1 + VR1)) = Vld + Vbe1 Or:                           Vbatt - Vld - Vbe1                    Ipd = --------------------                                R1 + VR1 Where: Vbatt = battery voltage under load. Ipd = total photodiode current. Vld = voltage across the laser diode. Vbe1 = Base-emitter drop (.7 V) of Q1. Since Ipd is proportional to optical power output, like LP-LD1 and LP-LD2 (above), brightness is dependent on battery voltage. In this case, it is a much more non-linear relationship as Vld and Vbe1 set a threshold of about 2 to 2.5 V below which there will be nothing and then output will increase based on Vbatt/(R1 + VR1). The circuit operates on 3 V but 4.5 V seems like the minimum to get any decent output.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 4 (LP-LD4) This one is very similar to LP-LD2, above. You can determine the math. :)
     Battery(+) o----------+--------+---------+----------+                            |        |         |          |                            |       _|_        /        __|__                            |       /_\ PD     \ R1     _\_/_                            |        |         / 1.2K     |                            |        +---+     \          |                            |        |   |     |          |                            |        \   |   |/ E         |                          +_|_    R2 /   +---| Q1 PNP     |                        C1 ---  1.2K \       |\ C         |                          - |        /         |        |/ C                            |        |         +--------| Q2 NPN                            |        /                  |\ E                            |     R3 \<--+                |                     S1     |     5K /   |                |                    Power   |        \   |                |                     _|_    |        |   |                |     Battery(-) o----o o----+--------+---+----------------+
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 5 (LP-LD5) This is the circuit from another inexpensive laser pointer. Well, actually it's from a diode laser module, but this was obviously just a pointer driver without the pushbutton (which I have added in the schematic). Battery voltage is 2.6 to 3.0 V. It's very similar to LP-LP1 and LP-LD2, above.
     Battery(+) o---------------+---------+------------+                                 |         |            |                                 |         / R2       __|__                                _|_        \ 2.7K     _\_/_ LD                                /_\ PD     /            |                                 |         \            |                                 |         |            |                                 |       |/ E           |                                 +-------| Q2 PNP       |                                 |       |\ C           |                                 |         |          |/ C                                 |         +------+---| Q1 NPN                                 /         |      |   |\ E                                 \ R3      |      /     |                                 / 3.6K   _|_     \ R1  |                     S1          \        --- C1  / 10K |                    Power        |         |      \     |                     _|_         |         |      |     |     Battery(-) o----o o---------+---------+------+-----+
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from IR Laser Module 1 (ILM-LD1) This is a very simple circuit from a 780 nm laser diode module sent to me by Shawo Hwa Industrial Co., Ltd., a Taiwanese manufacturer of laser pointers, laser modules, and other related laser devices. This unit is similar to the guts from a typical visible laser pointer. Connections are via wires though there is a battery contact spring hidden under heatshrink, but no switch or power adjust pot. The laser diode is in a 5.6 mm metal can though the window appears to be molded in place rather than glued from the inside.
             Battery(+) o----+--------+--------+--------+                              |        |        |        |                              |       _|_       /      __|__                              |    PD /_\    R2 \      _\_/_ LD                              |        |    10K /        |                              |        |        \        |                              |        |        |      |/ C                              |        |        +------| Q2 NPN                          C1 _|_       |        |      |\ E                       7.5uF ---       |      |/ C       |                              |        +------| Q1 NPN   |                              |        |      |\ E       /                              |        /        |     R3 \                              |     R1 \        |     10 /                              |   3.9K /        |        \                              |        \        |        |                              |        |        |        |             Battery(-) o-----+--------+--------+--------+
The battery voltage is spec'd at 3 V. The only reference device is the B-E junction of Q1 so power output will vary with temperature and not very much with battery voltage. Both SMT transistors were labeled "RIP". R1 could be changed to a pot to provide a variable power adjustment. I assume that for this module, its value is selected for each laser diode. I'm not sure what the rated output power is for this module other than "<5mW" but it actually measured 2.3 mW.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 1 (GLP-LD1) Here is the schematic for the driver from a CW green DPSS laser pointer generously contributed to the cause by Laserpointers.co.uk. There is no model number on the case but it is manufactured by Lightvision Technologies Corp., Taiwan. The pointer was given to me because (1) it was broken and (2) Laserpointers.co.uk apparently doesn't deal with this supplier anymore so they couldn't send it back for repair. The pointer is in a nice dark blue case with gold and chrome trim. It was quite dead. However, fiddling with the batteries while completing the contact from the positive terminal to the case resulted in some flashes of green light and with just the right pressure, a continuous beam. So, there had to be a bad connection inside. Clamping the chrome cap on the output-end in a vice with some protective padding and wiggling resulted in it coming loose relatively easily. The result is shown in Components of Typical Green DPSS Laser Pointer. It turns out that the laser module consists of several parts. Sorry, no complete dissection. :) These are screwed together with dabs of glue to keep them from shifting position. However, the positive return for the battery also goes though these joints (from rear cap though case to front cap, IR filter holder, collimating lens holder, DPSS module, laser diode case and finally back to the driver board). And one of the joints wasn't exactly tight. Perhaps, the path is really supposed to be via contact between the case and the DPSS module directly but the lumps of glue prevented this. So, I wrapped some bare wire around all the parts and then covered this with aluminum foil and tape. ;-)
The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 1 is a basic dual op-amp constant current driver. All part values were either labeled or measured except for C4 since I didn't risk putting a capacitance meter across the laser diode. But C4 looks identical to the others so there is high degree of confidence in the uF value. D1 and C1 provide soft-start and the pointer doesn't seem to mind reverse polarity (either by design or because Murphy took a day off). All in all, not a bad little circuit. No, I don't intend to turn the pot. ;-)
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 2 (GLP-LD2) Here is the schematic for the driver from the green DPSS laser pointer described in the section: The Edmund Scientific Model L54-101 Green Laser Pointer. Photos of the pointer are shown in Components of Edmund Scientific L54-101 Green DPSS Laser Pointer. This is a pulsed model operating at about 4.5 kHz with a 50% duty cycle. The driver board was designed by B&W Tek who are also the supplier of the pointer to Edmund Scientific. The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 2 uses what appears to be a low voltage 33202 dual op-amp. Do a Google search for "MC33202".) It's configured as a squarewave oscillator feeding a constant current driver. Part values for the capacitors were all guessed because they wouldn't produce meaningful readings on either of my DMMs. This is still a mystery.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 3 (GLP-LD3) This driver is from a pointer that is externally identical to the one described in the section: Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 1 (GLP-LD1) but the actual DPSS module and driver differ. The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 3 is a basic current regulated driver using a single op-amp with a range of approximately 0.167 to .333 A. It was set to about 0.300 A.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 4 (GLP-LD4) Here is the schematic for the driver from a Z-Bolt BTMK-10 green DPSS laser pointer. This one is rated at 5 mW, though I assume the same design is used for some higher power versions. The ZBolt BTMK-10 is actually not a pointer in the usual sense since it doesn't have a momentary switch on the side and is aimed at (no pun...) targeting applications. But I'll call it a pointer here. :) The switch is on the rear end and is latching. This one differs from the 3 previous drivers in that it uses Automatic Power Control (APC) rather than Automatic Current Control (ACC, constant current). So, the feedback loop is closed by a photodiode that samples a portion of the output beam. The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 4 uses what appears to be a low voltage ELM8548M1 dual op-amp. However, as can be seen in the schematic, there is no feedback resistor for the second op-amp so perhaps that has one built-in. The parts were all labeled, though I'm not positive about which labels went with which parts in a couple cases. There is also space for a tiny surface mount LED and its current limiting resistor.
While the APC circuit operation is quite straightforward, there would seem to be a potential issue should the circuit be incapable of obtaining the expected output power. Since there is no absolute current limit, it could drive the laser diode to destruction should someone power it in a cold environment where the diode wavelength doesn't match up with the vanadate absorption and it can't produce 5 mW at rated diode current. The current would then be limited only by circuit and battery resistance. However, if the designers were really clever, they might have set up the beam sampler to just enough pump light leaks through to the photodiode and limit the current even with insufficient green output. However, I rather doubt this to be the case since there is no way to adjust any current limit.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Simple Laser Diode Power Supply The first one is for low power laser diodes: (From: Brian Mork ([email protected]).)
Best circuit I've found:
            In +-------+ Out     R1  (+) o-----+---| LM317 |--------/\/\-----+-----+------o LD anode            |   +-------+      18 ohms*   |     |        C1 _|_ +    | Adjust              |    _|_ C2    __|__      22uF ---      +---------------------+    --- 1uF   _\_/_            |  =                                |          |            |                                   |  (-) o-----+-----------------------------------+------o LD cathode
Note: Resistor value depends on your specific laser diode current requirements. Discussion below assumes a laser diode with a 72 to 100 mA drive range. Power is 5.5 to 9 VDC. I use a 9 volt battery.
Watch the pin arrangement on the LM317. On the LM317L (the TO-92 plastic transistor type case) and the LM317T (TO-220 7805-type case), the pins are, left to right, Adjust-Output-Input.
For the resistor, I use a small carbon 10 ohm in series with a precision 10-turn 20 ohm adjustable. The combo was empirically set to about 17 ohms.
On initial power on, use three garden variety diodes stacked in series instead of the laser diode. Put a current meter in series with the diode stack and adjust the precision resistor for 50-60 mA. Disconnect power and replace the diode stack with the laser diode. Connect up power again, still watching on the current meter. The diode will probably initially glow dimly. I use a diode that lases at about 72 mA, and has a max rating of 100 mA. I use about 85 mA for normal ops.
Turn up the current, never exceeding your diode's max limit. The dim glow will increase in intensity, but at some point, a distinctive step in intensity will occur. Your diode is lasing. Remove the current meter as desired. Enjoy!
(From: Crow (alias Lostgallifreyan).)
In all the variations of laser diode drivers based on three terminal regulators like the LM317, there is the detail of selecting the series resistor. Standard resistor values rarely match exactly. However, two standard resistors can likely get you to within 1 mA of desired current on a range up to 5 amps, in a parallel or series network. But which two will get closest while remaining under the limit? And how large must they be to handle the current they'll take? LM317 and LM338 Current Regulator Resistor Calculator is a C program to find the best pairing of available resistors for the selected current at maximum power dissipation. The reasoning behind this is that while many of those drivers will preset or even modulate a current, many people will want to do it within a strict, hardwired upper limit, and sometimes 1.25/I just isn't enough information. The code is free to all, and will likely compile on anything that runs C code in a text-based shell or console window.
Even though the standard resistor ranges like E24 or E12 only cover every possible value at low tolerances, metal film resistors are usually sold as 1% regardless of how small the range is from a supplier. This means the coverage is like a net instead of a cloth. Two resistors are chosen by the program on the assumption of infinitely strict tolerance, but this will still deliver pairings whose current limit is very close to the desired current in almost all cases. Of course, the best thing to do is use 1% resistors. If there is a significant error in some rare case, the comparison of wanted and actual currents will show it. In this case, try some current to see if there is a better match to that. There usually won't be because the program tries all possibilities and gives you its best shot anyway. So use the most recise resistors you can get and bear in mind that for very low currents the regulator, rather than the resistors, will determine how accurate the result will be.
(From: Steve Roberts.)
Here's a similar circuit that will drive pump diodes for solid state lasers with up to about 0.8 A if a most excellent heatsink is used:
            In +-------+ Out   R1 1 ohm,2 W  (+) o-----+---| LM317 |--------/\/\-----+-----+------o LD anode            |   +-------+                 |     |        C1  |       | Adjust    R2 1K     |     |      22uF _|_+     +------------/\/\-----+   +_|_ C2    __|__     Tant- ---      |    R3     R4 500         --- 1uF   _\_/_       alum | -     +---/\/\----/\/\----+     - |          |            |           560      ^      |       |            |                    |      |       |            (-) o-----+--------------------+------+-------+------o LD cathode
Note: It is important to use a tantalum capacitor for C1. Input power should be regulated 5 to 6 VDC. Since there is some interaction between diode voltage and current with this design, make sure to set up the current adjustment with a dummy (e.g., dead) laser diode, or make sure it is set low before applying power and increase it slowly to the operating point. Then, fine tweak the current once the temperature of the diode has stabilized.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. EU38 Low Cost Constant Current Laser Diode Driver This is a small printed circuit board (about 14x35 mm) which will drive laser diodes in constant current mode up to 800 mA without a heat sink and about 1.2 A with a heatsink (not included). It is suitable for driving laser diodes not requiring optical feedback such as DPSS laser pump diodes of up to about 0.5 W output. The EU38 is available from Roithner Lasertechnik and formerly from B&W Tek. Thus, it is likely manufactured by someone else. Description and specs can be found on Roithner's Laser Diode Drivers Page.
The schematic I reverse engineered from the Roithner version can be found in EU38 Constant Current Laser Diode Driver. The circuit consists of an NPN power transistor controlled by a single op-amp. Feedback is taken from a 0.6 ohm series current sense resistor. One issue that I've found is that the reference is a zener diode (type unidentified) which probably doesn't have enough current going through it so while the feedback loop has enough gain and current regulation is quite good with respect to laser diode characteristics, the reference voltage changes slightly with input voltage. Thus, I recommend powering the unit from a regulated supply rather than a cheap wall adapter or batteries.
Not all components were labeled so it's quite possible there are errors. The zener voltage was determined by measurement with an input voltage to the board of about 4 VDC. I'm kind of guessing about the resistance of the Iadj pot (R4). It's more than 20K and less than 100K, so 50K is a nice standard intermediate value. The bias current or offset voltage or something :) of the mediocre op-amp (an LM358 clone) adds about 0.05 A to the output current.
I did find and fix two errors that were in my original schematic: (1) the value of R6 had been shown as 4.7K rather than 47K and (2) when I measured the voltage across the zener (ZD1), it was 1.05 V rather than the 1.5 V I had before. Although I was rather suspicious of that 1.05 V, a similar voltage has been confirmed by someone else. Perhaps the 1.5 V was wishful thinking when I originally traced the schematic.
The Roithner specs for the EU38 say that it can go to 1.2 A with a heatsink. As drawn, the maximum current is just about 1 A so there may still be errors in the schematic. If the resistance of the pot were much higher, the maximum current might almost get to 1.2 A. Or a user modification may be needed to go any higher. There are 6 through-pads on the PCB that I thought might have been intended for this purpose, but 4 are connected to ground, 1 is connected to power, and 1 is a no-connect.
I have used the EU38 to power the green demo laser described in the section: Even Simpler Instant Green DPSS Laser. The complete power supply is shown in Green Demo Laser Power Supply Using EU38. One complaint about the EU38 is that a jeweler's screwdriver must be used to adjust the current and the slot is in the metal wiper of the pot so it picks up 60 (or 50) Hz noise and modulates the diode current while touching it if the screwdriver handle isn't insulated!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Super Simple Laser Diode and TEC Driver Super Simple Laser Diode and TEC Driver uses a hand-full of Radio Shack parts to provide variable current to a low power laser diode along with a TEC for cooling. OK, they will have to be Digikey parts since RS doesn't really sell parts anymore. :) The laser diode driver is an adjustable voltage regulator with a current limiting resistor. Added filtering and reverse polarity protection guarantee no overshoot or transients when power cycling. The cooling-only TEC driver is a MOSFET with a pot for the set-point. With only a MOSFET as the active component, this won't be very precise for temperature tuning but is adequate to keep the diode cool. I built it to power a Crystalaser 35 mW red diode laser. The numbers by LD1, TH1, and TEC1 refer to the 10 pin ribbon cable connector on the laser head. LED2 provides a rough indication of the voltage across the TEC, and thus the current through it.
Note that the voltage for the TEC is the same as the voltage for the laser diode based on the argument that there will be correlation between the LD power and the required TEC power. It could also come from the fixed 12 VDC input.
For this low power Crystalaser laser, the TEC is almost unnecessary as the maximum current to the laser diode is under 100 mA. But it was an excuse to implement this trivial scheme. In fact, acceptable cooling could be achieved even without using any active components by simply putting the laser diode in series with the TEC. But with the MOSFET, it was somewhat better.
A regulated 12 VDC power supply is recommended. Using a 7812 to provide this from a 15 to 20 VDC source would be ideal.
There's nothing critical in the circuit. Any sort of common adjustable regulator can be used. The LT1084 was simply available, but an LM317 would be fine as well. Same for the MOSFET. The BUZ71A just happened to cry out to be used. :)
CAUTION: This is a more or less constant current driver without optical feedback. Therefore, it may not be suitable for laser diodes where the operating range of current is small.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Constant Current Supply for High Power Laser Diodes (From: Winfield Hill ([email protected]).) The schematic in the section: Simple Laser Diode Power Supply is the standard circuit for making a constant current source from an LM317 or LM338 (e.g. see The Art of Electronics, fig 6.38). The problem with this circuit is that for large currents (the only currents for which it has good accuracy, and is a serious part saver) it's hard to make the current variable.
For example, for a 3.5 A current source, the resistor value is 0.357 ohms, and if you then want a 3.1 A current you've got to unsolder it and replace it with a 0.403 ohm resistor. Bummer.
One option would be to put a low value pot across the sense resistor and connect its tap to the voltage regulator common/adjust terminal. This will work reasonably well for a modest current range - perhaps up to 2:1 as shown below - but runs into difficulties where a wide range of control is desired.
       In +-------+ Out        R1 1.01 ohm  Vin o----| LM317 |---+-----------/\/\----+----o 1.25 to 2.5 A current source           +-------+   |                   |               | Adj.  +---/\/\-----/\/\---+               |            R2        ^ R3               |         100 ohms     | 100 ohms               +----------------------+
The reason is that this arrangement can only *increase* the current from the nominal I = 1.25V/R. So, for example, to get a 10:1 range, the voltage across the sense resistor would be 12.5 V for the 10x current! In general this is not attractive for the high current condition because not only have you required a higher supply voltage, at the maximum current, but the power dissipation in the sense resistor is also quite high (more like HUGE --- sam).
Let me offer the following simple circuit, which I just created and haven't tried but 'oughta work' as a solution to this problem.
By contrast, this circuit can only *decrease* the current from the 1.25V/R value, but it easily handles a 10:1 range (or even much more) and the voltage across the sense resistor is never more than 1.25V, allowing low supply voltage (e.g. 5 V) and keeping the dissipation low.
       In +-------+ Out  R1 .25 ohms  Vin o----| LM338 |-------/\/\/----+-----o 0 to 5 A current source           +-------+                |               | Adj.          +----+               |            cw |    |               |          1K ^ /   _|_,               +-------------->\  '/_\  LM385-1.2                               /    |                               |    |                               +----+                                    |                        +------------------------+                        | I = 0.5 to 1.5 mA sink |                        +------------------------+                                   _|_                                    -
The 1K pot selects a portion of the floating 1.23 V reference voltage, and tricks the LM317 or LM338 into correspondingly reducing the voltage across the 0.25 ohm current-sense resistor. The pot is conventional and may be panel mounted. It should be possible to nearly shut off the LM338 (a minimum quiescent current will still flow). The current sink, I, which powers the floating 1.23 V reference, is not critical and may be a simple current mirror (sorry to see the TL011 gone!), or even a resistor to ground or any available negative voltage, depending upon the desired current-source voltage-compliance range. That's it!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver 1 (SG-DH1) This isn't exactly an entire design but one that uses a common logic power supply in an unconventional way. It may be possible to use a high current switchmode power supply as a variable current laser diode driver as long as it has remote sensing capability. The remote sensing feedback loop maintains a constant voltage (the spec'd supply voltage) between RS+ and RS-. Normally, this is used to compensate for the voltage drop in the wiring harness. By applying a variable control voltage between RS+ and V+, the power supply can be fooled into producing any output voltage from near 0 to its maximum rating as long as its minimum load requirement is satisfied. With a small resistor in series with the laser diode (or for those willing to take risks, the resistance of the laser diode), this results in a variable current to the laser diode. The only limit on output current is the maximum rating of the power supply. These types of power supplies, capable of 50 A, 100 A, or even higher current, are readily available on the surplus market. However, this scheme may only work with certain models, those which power their control circuitry separately from the main output and don't go into some sort of undervoltage shutdown if the output voltage goes too low. I don't know how to determine which models satisfy this requirement.
Vicor has application notes on doing this (among other things) with some of their Flatpac (among other) models. Search for "Programmable Current Source" or go to . The power supplies shown have an additional input called "Trim" which makes the modification particularly easy. I have an archived copy of the most relevant information at Vicor - Flatpac Applications Circuits.
I have not yet attempted to close the loop and provide actual current control but have opted for voltage control for now at least. The unit I've been using for these tests is a Shindengen PS5V100A, a fully enclosed fan cooled switchmode power supply that's about 15 years old. This unit is also nice in that it regulates well with no load. All that was needed was to remove the shorting link between V+ and RS+ and install a 20 ohm, 2 W resistor in its place. Then applying 0 to +15 VDC current limited by a 47 ohm, 5 W resistor across RS+ (+) and V+ (-), the output voltage would vary from near 0 to 5 VDC.
      RS- <------ Remote Sense -------> RS+        o                                 o        |     V-  Vout   V+               |        |     o          o                |        |     |    R0    |          R1    |    R2        |     |   250    |        20 2W   |  47 5W         Vcontrol        +-----+---/\/\---+-----+---/\/\---+---/\/\---o + 0 to 15 VDC - o---+        |                      |                                           |        +---|<|---+---/\/\---+-+-------------------------------------------+            LD1   |    R3    |           Laser  | .05 500W |    Adjusting Vcontrol from 0 to 15 V varies           Diode  o          o      Vout from 5 V to 0 V.                 VS- Vsense VS+
(R0 is internal to this particular power supply.)
R3 can be constructed from a length of building wire. For example, 20 feet of #14 copper wire has a resistance of 0.05 ohms but water cooling would be needed if run near full current. I'm actually only using a head lamp load for testing and it works fine.
The same scheme using RS- did not have enough range, probably due to the internal circuit design. This is too bad because the op-amp circuitry to drive it might have been simpler, or at least more intuitive to design.
(I did try a test of the same approach with a Pioneer Magnetics dual output power supply (5 VDC at 59 A, 12 VDC at 67 A). While control was possible, it didn't behave nearly as perfectly as the Shindengen supply. More than 1/2 A of control current was required to change the 5 V output to 4 V. And while the 12 VDC output could be reduced to near 0 V, the cooling fans cut out at about 8 VDC so they would need to be powered separately for continuous operation at high current. But this might be nice for driving series connected laser diode bars.)
The challenge is to convert this to a user friendly form that is safe for the laser diode. I am designing a control panel which incorporates what I hope will be fail-safe circuits to minimize the chance of excessive current either from power cycling or by user error. It will use closed loop feedback so the actual current can be set (rather than voltage) and includes a multifunction panel meter (set current, actual current, diode voltage). It will enable diode current only if all power supplies are stable and correct, the 10 turn current adjust pot is at 0, and with the press of a green button.
However, initially, I'm using a 10 turn pot to control the current with a digital panel meter monitoring current via a 0.025 ohm sense resistor. Current is limited to 50 A by a 0.06 ohm power resistor. Believe it or not, even 50 A is way below the limit for the diodes I need to test! See the section: Characteristics of Some Really High Power IR Diode Lasers.
The schematic in Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver 1 includes the control panel, connections to the 100 A power supply, and laser diode wiring.
The basic control panel includes an Enable switch (eventually to be replaced with a keylock switch), Diode On and Off buttons, the 10 turn pot and DPM which reads 0 to 100 A. A differential amplifier converts the voltage across the current sense resistor into a DC voltage for the DPM. Without the differential amplifier, the control current was seriously affecting the readings as 1 A is only 2.5 mV. It's not possible (or at least not convenient) to separate the power and signal wiring to provide a proper single point ground.
Both the sense and current limiting resistors are simply lengths of #14 copper wire with forced air cooling. This works very well with the diode's output digging pits in my brick beam stop. :) However, for continuous operation, it may be necessary to replace the #14 with #8 because even the modest heating of the copper changes its resistance enough to noticeably affect current.
With minor changes in part values for the current limiting resistors, and the set-point for the power supply output voltage, it should be possible to drive a pair of laser diodes in series as long as they can be isolated from the common point. (The positive connection to a high power laser diode is usually the mounting block of the diode but it may not be connected to the external case itself.) However, one risk with this setup is that if one of the laser diodes fails shorted, it will likely take the other one as well since the current will spike to a very high level.
The setup is shown in Photo of Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver In Action. The water-cooled laser diode in the aluminum box is capable of 35 W output at around 55 to 60 A. The power supply is at the upper left with the control panel in front of it showing 40 A. Behind the power supply is the coil of white wire acting as a current limiting resistor next to its cooling fan. The current sense resistor is the 12 inches of so of red wire running from the power supply to the terminal strip. The blue-white glow is my digital camera's response to intense IR. The camera is really confused. :) When viewed through IR blocking laser goggles, a line on the brick starts glowing at a current of around 35 A and is white-hot at 45 A, where the current limit of the power supply is presently set (via the current limiting resistor and wiring resistance with the power supply adjusted for a maximum output of 5 VDC). The old darkroom enlarger timer in the upper right is used to turn the driver on for exactly the 20 seconds needed for my "meat thermometer" type power meter to take its reading, which would show about 23 W at 40 A for the diode in the photo. The reading at 45 A is about 27 W.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Tim's High Power Laser Diode Driver (TO-LD1) (The schematic and portions of the description below are from: Tim O'Brien ([email protected]).) The circuit in Tim's High Power Laser Diode Driver is designed for high power laser diodes which include a monitor photodiode for optical feedback. Note that most common high power diodes are driven with a constant current but optical feedback enables more precise control of output power. Diodes like this are available from Roithner Lasertechnik at very reasonable prices.
The front-end is a current differential amplifier (very similar to the approach used in the LM2900 Norton op amp). I hand-picked the two transistors for the current mirror for close matching. They are mounted in a common heat sink to keep them at the same temperature.
The constant current sources are LM334s. These are cheap and work well. The one used on the non-inverting input of the current mirror is adjustable to about 2 mA. The one used as the common emitter amplifier load was set to about 1 mA.
There is a 100 uF, 16 V capacitor on board too as well as a reverse biased diode in parallel with an RC snubber directly across the laser leads (not shown).
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Joshua's High Power Laser Diode Driver (JD-LD1) This is a simple design good to at least 3 A that can easily be extended to even higher current. See Josh's Web Site. Go to "Physics", "Lasers", "Regulated Current Source for High Power Laser Diode". What's still needed is protection to guarantee that the circuit is well behaved when power cycling. This circuit will probably evolve over time.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver "Visible-Laser Driver Has Digitally Controlled Power And Modulation" was published in the "Ideas For Design" section of "Electronic Design", March 23, 1998, by Roger Kenyon of Maxim. Go to http://electronicdesign.com/"Electronic Design and search for "visible laser diode driver digital 1998" or something similar. The circuit provides 1024 discrete output levels from a laser diode (with optical feedback) using a D/A converter with a 3 wire serial input. In essence, it is a basic laser diode driver with a programmable reference.
Also see the section: Laser Diode Drive Chips.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Pulsed Laser Diode Drivers The following circuits would be suitable for driving the type of pulsed laser diodes found in the Chieftain tank rangefinder and currently available from OSRAM Opto Semiconductors and possibly other sources. These are very different than the sort of laser diodes with which we are generally familiar. A typical specification might be 8 W peak power at 850 or 900 nm (depending on model) with power requirements of 10 A at 0.1% maximum duty cycle. Thus, the average output power is actually in the mW range even though these laser diodes may be listed in some surplus suppliers' catalogs (like those of Bull Electronics) as multi-watt devices with the duty cycle restriction listed in fine print, if at all! Since the average power dissipation is also very low, they may come in plastic packages like LEDs with flat polished faces (and no possibility of adding a heatsink, which is one of the major limitations on average output power)! Other than time-of-flight laser rangefinders and related applications, I'm not sure what use these would be to a hobbyist. And, their output is totally invisible but very definitely not eye-safe. Here are a couple of options for drivers:
A simple approach that should work is to use an SCR as the switch triggered by your favorite pulse generator, 555 timer based astable, or other oscillator circuit followed by a trigger device like a neon bulb, diac, or small SCR to guarantee fast turn-on of SCR1. The circuit below is similar to the one from Scientific American (see below) which describes the use of pulsed laser diodes back in March 1973 when no other types had been invented yet (or at least none were readily available). With the component values shown, the laser diode should have a peak current of about 10 A with a 100 ns time constant. Thus, it isn't a nice rectangular pulse but that's for the advanced course. :) R1 limits charging current, R2 limits discharge current, and D1 provides reverse polarity protection for the laser diode.
                                   R1                    +200 VDC o-----/\/\------+-----+                                   50K       |     |                                             /    _|_ C1                                          R2 \    --- 5nF,250V                                          20 /    _|_                                             \     -                                           __|__ SCR1        (1 KHz max)                        _\_/_ TIC106D       +------------+     +---------+      / |   400V,4A       | Oscillator |-----| Trigger |-----'  |       +------------+     +---------+        +--------+                                           __|__     _|_                                 Pulsed LD _\_/_     /_\ D1                                             |        |  1N4007                                             +--------+                                            _|_                                             -
Scientific American had an article on driving a pulsed laser diode in "Infrared Diode Laser", March, 1973, pg. 114. This is also a part of the collection: "Light and its Uses". There is a pulse drive circuit in Skip Campisi's "Laser Clinic" article in Poptronics, June 2001. It's based on an NPN transistor operating in avalanche mode to generate the required short high current pulses. There used to be a driver circuit on the SVBx High Tech Labs Web site without attribution. (However, this Web site is now defunct. If anyone has saved this circuit, please send me mail via the Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Email Links Page.) The RCA SG2002 laser diode is probably long obsolete but the ones found in Chieftain tank rangefinder should be similar (though the specific ratings may differ somewhat). OSRAM Opto Semiconductors currently manufactures similar devices.
I couldn't find a substitute for the VM64GA but I expect that a readily available N-channel enhancement mode MOSFET like the IRF530 would work in its place. Replacements for the any of the other parts shouldn't be critical. Make sure you have the complete datasheet for your laser diode so you can modify component values intelligently! :)
The discrete totem pole buffer circuit designed to provide very fast turn-on and turn-off may be overkill depending on your requirements and it may be sufficient to just drive the power MOSFET directly from a pulse generator or other signal source.
Check out Directed Energy, Inc. for schematics, white papers, and specs using ultra fast power MOSFETS. You can also buy complete drivers for pulsed laser diodes with pulse widths down to at least 4 ns at 40 AMPs. And just to repeat, in case you have forgotten: Most common low power laser diodes can't be pulsed in this manner to achieve high power status - they instantly turn into Dark Emitting Laser Diodes (DELDs) or expensive LEDs. :)
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIP Laser Diode Driver (From: Rob Kirke ([email protected]).) I just recently reverse engineered the IR laser driver out of an HP LaserJet IIP (Part number RG1-1594). I've drawn up the full schematic for the board and have got it working outside the printer with with a simple power supply using a 7808, 7805, and a couple of capacitors. See Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIP Laser Diode Driver (RG1-1594).
The board obviously supports very fast beam modulation, and has a complete collimating assembly. The diode itself is a standard case, and easy to get to (4 screws, no glue or springs) so it could be swapped for a visible diode or replaced easily. Two feedback adjust trimmers are located on the board (one fine adjust, one coarse)
Also, I've seen these boards advertised as replacement parts on the net for $20, so they would make quite a nice unit for someone who doesn't have the time to build a driver board up.
Here is the pinout:
+5 VDC GND Photodiode output Laser drive level input Modulation (Active low) GND +8 VDC The feedback loop seems to be 1:1 so pins 3 and 4 can be shorted together (Mine runs at about 43 mA under these conditions). Pin 5 was originally driven by a single gate from a 74LS08.
Here is the parts list if you want to build your own:
R401    42.2 R402    10K R403    10K R404    47 R405    1.5K R406    1.5K R407    510 R408    3.9K R409    10K R410    1.5K R411    10 R412    510 R413    8.66K R414    1.2K R415    47 R416    27K R417    10 R418    10 R419    10
VR401   500 VR402   10K
C401    33 uF   25 V     Electrolytic C402    33 uF   25 V     Electrolytic C403    0.1 uF  25 V     Ceramic C404     C405    680 pF           Ceramic C406    0.01 uF          Ceramic C407    270 pF           Ceramic
Q401    2SA950           PNP Q402    2SC1815          NPN Q403    2SC4455          NPN Q404    2SC4455          NPN
IC401   HA17324          Hitachi Quad Op-Amp Please contact me via the email address, above, if anyone finds out what wavelength the laser is, or how many milliwatts. I'm presuming about 800 nm at about 5 mW.
(From: Sam.)
Someone suggested it was 50 mW at 930 nm but the power seems high for a printer of this era. Though, perhaps the same driver has been used in newer higher performance ones.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIIP Laser Diode Driver (From: Filip Ozimek.) The pinout of the LaserJet IIIP driver is the same as for the LaserJet IIP, above. I found that light emitted from the laser diode is 786.5 nm (measured with spectrometer) and average power is about 4.5 to 5 mW (measured with a laser power meter). The laser diode is enclosed in a TO-18 (5.6 mm) package with ground connected to the case.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. A 1 MHz Analog Laser Modulator Based On LM317 Regulator (From: Crow (alias Lostgallifreyan).) Start with the two pictures, it's more fun that way and this text will make more sense. They are LM317-Based Laser Diode Driver Traces and LM317-Based Laser Diode Driver Schematic and PCB Layout.
Description: This laser diode modulator exceeds the performance of many, for a few reasons. First, the LM317 regulator, though not approved by most experts for this task, is clearly aimed at excellent transient handling, and is known for this ability. If 1.5 amps is not enough, you can substitute for the LM317 with an LM338 to get up to 5 amps, and even gang several of them (as described in the data sheet, and see the detail, below), making huge output power available with a very simple circuit. Graphs in various data sheets support my assertion that it should be fine up to at least 1 MHz with arbitrary waveshapes, and there is a radio engineer called Harry Lythall who accidentally made an LM317 oscillate and subsequently transmitted successful messages at 1.8 MHz and who thinks it can be pushed to higher frequencies. (I think that with a sine wave requirement for radio broadcast, he is certainly right about this, but I have no ham license so I won't be trying to prove it).
How to use it: Set the pot to maximum, remove modulation from input. Switch on power. Adjust the pot downwards till the beam all but disappears as the diode current drops just below lasing threshold. Then apply modulation. That's it.
Details of use: Build the board as described in the second picture (some details from the main text below will be needed to do this right). LM317-Based Laser Diode Driver Artwork can be used to make the PCB. If you can't get an LT1215 op-amp use a CA3240 for now. It's slower but it works well if about 200 kHz is all you need (it will still do this better than the Die4drive or Flexmod N2 drivers). To get fast modulation, to well beyond 1 MHz, a fast slew rate is needed. Large gain bandwidth product is less important because both halves of the op-amp are running at unity gain, but stability at unity gain is important. To optimise the compromise between stability and speed, some small ultrafast ringing occurs, but nothing that harms a laser or disturbs a show. The LT1215 needs several picofarads of compensation for unity gain stability (one capacitor for each stage, a tiny surface mount device soldered to pads on the back of the board). For speeds below about 200 kHz we can get away with a CA3240 (which needs no such compensation), making this by FAR the easiest laser driver to find parts for! But we want a FAST laser driver, do we not? :)
Wire the pot so the ground is on the top end of the scale, a fully clockwise turn should ground the wiper. Use a GOOD pot, a sealed cermet or polymer track type. Even better, a potentiometer IC which offers several useful advantages for remote control as well as low noise and long life and secure retention of setting... At minimum it's all modulation, at maximum it's all fixed output current. The board has space for a single turn cermet preset pot, and four pads, so it can be mounted such that full clockwise turn can be all modulation, or full fixed output current, depending on preference.
Any input subtracts from the reference voltage, and full input almost cancels it (but not quite, it it wise to avoid ground clipping in the op-amp if possible, to prevent strange behaviour at high speeds). When this inverted modulation is passed to the second stage via the pot, it subtracts from the load's high side voltage, making the regulator reduce its current when the original input goes low. At full input or pot maximum, as either case removes input to the second stage inverting input, the second stage output equals the load's high side voltage, which in turn means the maximum current is solely determined by the regulator's fixed resistor. The input's zener diode prevents a signal capable of driving the regulator to output more current, as does clipping at ground in the first stage even if the zener failed.
The pot is also useful as a simple fader in absence of modulation, and if set to minimum position, allows remote dimming by varying an input DC voltage from 0V, to 5V for full output. Note that local dimming with the inbuilt pot overrides the modulation at maximum setting, you cannot modulate to reduce from maximum preset brightness. If you need to do this, as with some inbuilt laser modulators, you need to invert your signal before input to the driver, as is usual in any laser system that conforms to high side drive and active high input. Usually you'd only need to do this when the laser's inbuilt modulator does not conform.
The second op-amp stage takes into account whatever the laser diode voltage drop is, so any dynamic shift in that value with changes in current is automatically compensated. Dangerous input, including overvoltage, reversed polarity, even moderate static discharge, is prevented from harming the driver or laser diode by a combination of input resistor and zener diode. The zener's capacitance also forms a filter with the 100R resistor, that allows clean waveshapes at 1 MHz while slowing down any transients fast enough to cause trouble later if they got through. Don't tempt fate by being careless of static discharge, otherwise add a large 6V metal oxide varistor across the input socket if you insist on riding the lightning. C3 and C4 on the board are for power supply decoupling. Make C3, the closest one to the op-amp, a 0.1 uF low ESR ceramic, and C4 a 40 V, 22 u low ESR tantalum.
Another important aspect of the use of two op-amp stages is the repair of mark/space ratio symmetry at high speed due to differences in rise and fall time. As one stage falls when the other rises, the differences cancel to an extent great enough to allow higher performance than with a single stage. Despite two stages slowing the transitions more than one, this is still true, as scoping the output of the first stage, then the second, will demonstrate. A small asymmetry exists at 1 MHz anyway, but far less than appears on the first stage.
NOTE: An SPDT switch could select either the input on the first stage, or the output from it, to feed to the pot. This could allow a simple way to get compatibility for systems with inverted signaling, but the price will be a loss of symmetry correction for high speeds because in this case the first op-amp stage is not used.
As you can gang output resistors and diodes to one regulator, and multiple regulators to ONE driver, you can set the resistor for any diode that falls outside spec for a given batch. You can set control for THOUSANDS of diodes safely with ONE potentiometer, if you want to, so long as they have the same ratio of maximum current to threshold current. For any diode's resistor, calculate value by 1.25/A where A is required maximum current. Pick the nearest preferred value ABOVE the calculated value, then calculate the required resistance to parallel with it, to get the total resistance needed if the initial value is more than 1% out. Calculate to find the power dissipation for each, so they won't burn out in use. The board layout has space for this, when driving a single diode up to at least 1.5 A, but bigger resistors may be needed if using an LM338. The circuit MUST monitor the high side of ONE laser diode, but other diodes and resistors can safely use whatever current the regulator makes available to them. Ganging regulators is the same, common the ADJ pins, you still only need to monitor ONE laser diode. Ideally, pick ALL duplicate components from the same high grade batch, and leave a little headroom to allow for slight differences. The odd loss of a laser diode, if you like to push the envelope, is MORE than made up for by the ease of building a simple array extensible by few, and cheap, parts. This is one of the joys of a proper high side driver.
No matter how big the laser system, you only need three drivers, one per primary colour (plus one for any unusual extra colours you might use, such as 405 nm). You do NOT need one per diode here! :) Given the quality of the ideal potentiometer, this is a Good Thing, those cost. But, less than a diode driver costs so this still saves plenty. Remember that the high load voltage capability (up to about 3V short of supply, which in turn can be up to 36V) means you can string laser diodes in SERIES from one resistor too, as an alternative to parallel connection. With this driver (fitted with LM338 instead of LM317) you could likely modulate a 32V 100W floodlamp LED with a 1 MHz sawtooth wave, but I can't think why the hell anyone would want to.
(From: Sam.)
I have tested a handcrafted sample of one of these using a dummy load (2 silicon diodes in series) and that worked as advertised with no overshoot when driven with a squarewave and a frequency response to at least what is described above. While this is not exhaustive, the results do seem promising.
Temperature Compensation For Laser Drivers Based On LM317 Regulators (From: Crow (alias Lostgallifreyan).) Laser diodes need stable drive, especially when driven close to their safe limit. High power DVD diodes and multimode diodes may mode hop, so controlling power is less feasible than controlling current. This is because there may be at least two specific currents in some range that can produce a given output power, and is also why these diodes rarely come with photodiodes built in.
This means that the only other significant thing we can easily control to maintain drive close to safe maximum output is the diode's operating temperature; or in this case, the current with respect to whatever that temperature happens to be. Then, barring mode-hops, the output of a direct injection laser diode is stable enough to predict, which means that all we really need to do is specify the maximum current for the diode's own safety, at the minimum temperature at which we will run it.
Then again, there are those who like to use LM317-type circuits because they're cheap, powerful, accurate, and can even be modulated to 1 MHz or more with any waveformm. We may also like to push for the best safe current at ANY temperature (within reason). As all these circuits have one thing in common, a sense resistor, the best place to easily compensate for temperature is to modify this resistance directly. Here is a way to do it.
This is a bit terse, but complete in detail. (Reading on the net about thermistor selection will help too). What it does is use an array of two or three surface-mount negative temperature coefficient (NTC) thermistors, bonded to the laser diode's heatsink, and connected directly to parallel the sense resistor. Apart from taking this thermistor resistance into account when calulating current for any LM317-based driver, no other modification to any circuit is needed.
An example: The Opnext/Hitachi Laser Diode HL6526FM
The current for 80 mW output at specified temperature was measured as:
 Sample  0°C=107 mA  Sample  0°C=108 mA  Sample  0°C=109 mA  Sample  0°C=109 mA    1:   25°C=116 mA    2:   25°C=118 mA   3:    25°C=118 mA   4:    25°C=118 mA         50°C=133 mA         50°C=136 mA         50°C=136 mA         50°C=136 mA
 RS order code 247-7244, 150 ohm, SMT NTC thermistor, b constant of 2750,  5% tolerance and low cost.
 Power rating at 25°C            125mW  Optimum working dissipation     1mW  Resistance tolerance            5%  b constant                      2750 to 4100  Thermal dissipation constant    1.5mW/°C  Thermal time constant           4 seconds  Operating temperature range     -55°C to +125°C  Dimensions                      L=2, W=1.25, TO5 Here are the equations for deriving values from the technical data, 1K scale, 2.326K at 0°C and 0.49K at 50°C:
 T = K(R/1000)   T is value of the compound thermistor at given temperature,                  K is the known value of a 1K thermistor at given temperature,                  R is the known value of the compound thermistor at 25°C.
    1/F + 1/T    I is the resulting current in amps supplied by the regulator. I = ---------    F is the value of the known fixed resistance,        0.8       T is carried over from before.
P = T(1.25/T)^2  P is the resulting power dissipation at given temperature. If T is 75 ohms, made from two 150 ohm NTC thermistors in parallel, and F is a network of metal film resistors equal to 12.4 ohms at 1% tolerance, the regulator tracks the current/temperature curve of the laser diode extremely well, and the total regulator parts cost is less than £2.00.
                                             _________    +---/\/\/\---+          I for 0°C-50°C                    I|         |O  |     F      |                                  -----------| LM317 T |---+            +---+-----------           0°C=107.97 mA                     |_________|   |     T      |   |            25°C=117.47 mA                         A|        +---/\/\/\---+   |          50°C=134.82 mA                          |          Thermistor     |                                                  +-------------------------+ Then the power dissipation will be:
          0°C=8.96 mW            They will be dissipating a lot more power than the optimum 1 mW,          25°C=20.8 mW            but well within specs for the operating temperature range. They          50°C=21.3 mW            will be thermally clamped, bonded to the laser diode heatsink. Note: While scaling is excellent, the offset isn't, given only 5% tolerance in the thermistors, so a 1% metal film resistor network must be built with a variable resistance to finely tune it. The statement (1/75+1/(1/(1/(4*3.3)+1/(100+470))))/0.8 allows a 470 ohm multiturn preset to set the current between about 4 mA and 6 mA off-range, just enough to accommodate a 5% error. While it looks safe, the calculation predicts a very non-linear response, so this one must be tested. The main resistance will be four 3.3 ohm resistors in series, parallel with a network of series values, 100 ohms and the 470 ohm preset. Which is wired so the current falls, not rises, if it goes open circuit.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Parallel Laser Diode Driver 1 (Circuit and portions of description from Szabo Gabor.) Unlike most other laser diode driver circuits, this one essentially robs current from the diode so that it should be able to be added to most existing constant current systems without modifying their design. Use with caution though as they will see a dynamically varying load, so AC or transient behavior may not be predictable. See Parallel Laser Diode Driver 1 This circuit can operate with modulation because of the leaky integrator's averaging effect. The time constant can be changed by modifying the 3.3 uF capacitor. It's currently set to ~15 ms for our 78.125 kHz modulation, but in CW mode there's no need for this capacitor at all. This example uses light feedback, but that is not necessary. Another benefit of schemes like this is that it should be impossible to damage the laser diode from overcurrent unless the constant current driver becomes unstable. Of course, it must be set at the highest current desired. Then the parallel circuit can reduces current from there.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. More Laser Diode Driver Schematics Here are a few more. Some have errors!!! See notes below. And the circuits found in the manufacturer's application notes are often not tested. :) Skip Campisi has a nice article entitled "Laser Clinic" Poptronics, June 2001. There are schematics with complete parts lists with component values selected for the Sharp LT022MC 780 nm LD, Mitsubishi ML720 1,300 nm LD, and the Hitachi HL6712G 670 nm LD (all 5 mW max) and a pulsed driver for the high power LASD59 (similar to the RCA 40861 and LDs from OSRAM and others). CAUTION: While the author does provide some basic laser safety information, it would have been nice to have more on the the critical drive requirements of laser diodes. I'm afraid there may be some disappointment when more than a few laser diodes turn into DELDs. He notes the effects of ESD and reverse polarity but doesn't appear to deal with the very important maximum current ratings. The only way to set up these laser diodes for maximum safe (for the LD, that is) output is with a laser power meter since their characteristics vary from device to device.
Circuit Cellar Magazine has a design using a PLD that will drive a typical low power laser diode using optical feedback and includes modulation. See: Project 247: Laser Diode Controller. It can probably do a lot more than they have implemented without requiring additional parts. However, circuit to simply provide the features shown would only cost about $2 for discrete parts or a laser diode driver chip, no downloading of firmware needed! I'm also not convinced it handles power cycling or fault conditions reliably. Laser Circuits at the Discovery Circuits Web Site has links to a few, mostly laser diode related, schematics. SatSleuth Laser Schematic Collection has a variety of links - many back to Sam's Laser FAQ - but a few might be useful.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Communications Systems Using Diode Lasers Driver Enhancements to Provide Modulation Capability Raw laser diodes typically have an electrical->optical frequency response that extends to hundreds of MHz or beyond. However, most simple drivers designed for continuous wave (CW) operation (including all of the discrete circuits described elsewhere in this chapter) have such heavy filtering and isolation from power supply transients and noise that control beyond a few Hz is usually not possible. In principle, modifications to improve the frequency response by reducing the filtering, and to provide a modulation input, should be straightforward. However, in practice there are all sorts of ways to screw up resulting in either unacceptable behavior or a dead laser diode or both and it is usually much better and easier to drive the laser diode in such a way that it never goes into complete cutoff:
(From: Jonathan Bromley ([email protected]).)
"I'll second that. Modulating a laser to complete cutoff is a very, very bad game for all sorts of reasons: The light versus current behavior is hideously non-linear below about 10% of full output, so you really need dynamic feedback control - but the photodiodes tend to be slow, so that's not on. Spectral quality, and beam shape, go to blazes at low power levels lasers don't turn on from fully-off anywhere near as fast as they can vary intensity around the 50% level. It's pig-difficult to design the modulation circuit so it is guaranteed never to overshoot the current that gives 100% full light output (which is essential, because even very brief over-power transients dramatically shorten the laser's life). But if the information from Honeywell and others is to be believed, the new vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) are much better behaved and can be modulated to extinction at quite high rates. They're also extremely cute bits of device technology. A couple of simple such modulation circuits are shown below. CAUTION: Since both the following affect the optical feedback, attempt at your own risk!
The following applies to laser diode power supplies TO-LD1 and RE-LD1 through RE-LD3. Similar modifications could be made to RE-LD4 but this is left as an exercise for the student! :-)
A bi-level modulation scheme could be easily implemented by connecting a general purpose NPN transistor across an additional resistor (at point XY). Then, full power will be achieved with the transistor turned on and reduced power with it turned off. Select a value for R2 that will still maintain the current above the lasing threshold - 1K is just a start.
                          X                           o                           |                           +-----+                           |C    |     Typical transistors: 2N2222, 2N3904.                   R1    |/      /    TTL Input o---/\/\---|  Q1   \ R2                   1K    |\      / 1K                           |E    |            Y o------------+-----+
Here is another circuit which should achieve somewhat linear control of laser power since optical power output should be proportional to photodiode current. Resistor values shown are just a start - you will need to determine these for your specific laser diode and operating point.
                                   R                                    o                                    |                                    \ R1       X                                    / 10K      o                                    \          |                           C1 10uF  |        |/ C                       o------)|----+--------|    Q1                             -  +   |        |\ E                  Line level        |  2N3904  |                    audio           /          /                                 R2 \       R3 \                       o        10K /       1K /                       |            |          |         Y o-----------+------------+----------+
Also see the section: Integrated Circuits for Driving Laser Diodes since most of these ICs are designed with speed modulation capability built in. Diode Laser Based Line-of-Sight Communicators Here are a couple of sites with complete plans for systems using readily available parts: Derek Weston (Email: [email protected]) has constructed an IrDA tranceiver based loosely on the driver in RE-LD1 and a Crystal Semiconductor CorporationCS8130 IR transceiver IC. A complete description of this project may be found at his: UPN Laser Transceiver Web Site on the Realtime Control Web site. Peter Philips' Laser Link Communicator was originally published in "Electronics Australia", July 1997. This allows for the transmission of high quality audio up to distances of several hundred meters. Either a visible or IR laser diode may be used (the latter providing for greater security but increases the difficulty of initial alignment).
Back to Sam's Laser FAQ Table of Contents. Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Forward to Helium-Neon Lasers. Sam's Laser FAQ, Copyright © 1994-2020, Samuel M. Goldwasser, All Rights Reserved. I may be contacted via the Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Email Links Page.
0 notes
Text
scrambledegzz.hack01
Radical Science Distribution:
Sam's Laser FAQ, Copyright © 1994-2020, Samuel M. Goldwasser, All Rights Reserved.
I may be contacted via the Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Email Links Page.
Table of Contents:
Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents Laser Diode Drive Requirements Alternatives - Diode Laser Modules, Laser Pointers Laser Pointers and Diode Laser Modules - The Low Stress Approach Power Regulators in Laser Pointers Laser Pointer with a Resistor for a Regulator Substituting Batteries in Laser Pointers Powering a Laser Pointer From an External Source Blinking Laser Pointer or Diode Laser Module? Integrated Circuits for Driving Laser Diodes Laser Diode Drive Chips Caution About Cheap Laser Diode Drivers Comments on Some Commercial Drivers and Detectors More on Laser Diode Characteristics and Drivers Comments on Driver Education for Laser Diode Driver Designers Variations in Laser Diode Monitor Photodiode Current Sensitivity Response Time of Laser Diode and Monitor Photodiode Power Changes With Collimating Optics Using an External Photodiode for Power Control Driving High Power Laser Diodes Testing Laser Diode Driver Circuits Sam's Laser Diode Test Supply 1 Testing with a Laser Diode Simulator Art's Laser Diode Simulator Very Basic Laser Diode Power Supplies Bare Bones Laser Diode Power Supply Battery Power for Laser Diodes Schematics of Laser Diode Power Supplies Toshiba Discrete Laser Diode Power Supply (TO-LD1) Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1) Laser Diode Power Supply 2 (RE-LD2) Laser Diode Power Supply 3 (RE-LD3) Laser Diode Power Supply 4 (RE-LD4) Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1) Modification of SG-LD1 for Common Cathode LD/PD (SG-LD2) K3PGP's Laser Diode Driver (K3-LD1) Viacheslav's Laser Diode Driver (VS-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 1 (LP-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 2 (LP-LD2) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 3 (LP-LD3) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 4 (LP-LD4) Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 5 (LP-LD5) Laser Diode Driver from IR Laser Module 1 (ILM-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Red Laser Module 1 (RLM-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 1 (GLP-LD1) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 2 (GLP-LD2) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 3 (GLP-LD3) Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 4 (GLP-LD4) Simple Laser Diode Power Supply EU38 Low Cost Constant Current Laser Diode Driver Super Simple Laser Diode and TEC Driver Constant Current Supply for High Power Laser Diodes Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver 1 (SG-DH1) Tim's High Power Laser Diode Driver (TO-LD1) Joshua's High Power Laser Diode Driver (JD-LD1) Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver Pulsed Laser Diode Drivers Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIP Laser Diode Driver Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIIP Laser Diode Driver A 1 MHz Analog Laser Modulator Based On LM317 Regulator Temperature Compensation For Laser Drivers Based On LM317 Regulators Parallel Laser Diode Driver 1 More Laser Diode Driver Schematics Communications Systems Using Diode Lasers Driver Enhancements to Provide Modulation Capability Diode Laser Based Line-of-Sight Communicators
Back to Sam's Laser FAQ Table of Contents. Back to Laser Diode Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Drive Requirements The following must be achieved to properly drive a laser diode and not ruin it in short order: Absolute current limiting. This includes immunity to power line transients as well as those that may occur during power-on and power-off cycling. The parameters of many electronic components like ICs are rarely specified during periods of changing input power. Special laser diode drive chips are available which meet these requirements but a common op-amp may not be suitable without extreme care in circuit design - if at all. Current regulation. Efficiency and optical power output of a laser diode goes up with decreasing temperature. This means that without optical feedback, a laser diode switched on and adjusted at room temperature will have reduced output once it warms up. Conversely, if the current is set up after the laser diode has warmed up, it will likely blow out the next time it is switched on at room temperature if there is no optical feedback based regulation. Note that the damage from improper drive is not only due to thermal effects (though overheating is also possible) but due to exceeding the maximum optical power density (E/M field gradients?) at one of the end facets (mirrors) - and thus the nearly instantaneous nature of the risk. The optical output of a laser diode also declines as it heats up. This is reversible as long as no actual thermal damage has taken place. However, facet damage due to exceeding the optical output specifications is permanent. The result may be an expensive LED or (possibly greatly) reduced laser emission.
I accidentally blew one visible laser diode by neglecting to monitor the current but it wasn't the sudden effect some people describe - the current really had to be cranked up well beyond the point where the brightness of the laser beam stopped increasing. It did indeed turn into a poor excuse for an LED. One data point and you can conclude the world. :-)
Another one was blown by assuming that a particular driver circuit would work over a range of input voltages when in fact it was supposed to be powered from a regulated source. At first the degradation in brightness appeared to be reversible. However, what was probably happening was that damage to the laser diode was occurring as soon as the brightness appeared to level off. The natural tendency was then to back off and approach this same point again. Not quite as bright? Crank up the current. Finally, once it is much too late, the realization sets in that it will *never* be quite as bright as it was originally - ever again. This one still lases but at about 1/10th of its former brightness.
If you then try to power this damaged laser diode with a driver circuit using optical feedback, further instantaneous damage will occur as the driver attempts to maintain the normal optical output - which is now impossible to achieve and only succeeds in totally frying the device as it increases the current in a futile attempt to compensate.
And a comment about the expensive Nichia violet laser diodes (see the section: Availability of Green, Blue, and Violet Laser Diodes). Physically, they look like ordinary laser diodes and except for a higher voltage drop, the driving characteristics are basically similar. However, I've heard that they are even more sensitive to EVERYTHING than their visible and IR cousins and will degrade or die more easily. Since the wavelength of these diodes (in the 400 to 420 nm range) is basically useless for applications requiring visibility, aside from the "being the first kid on your block" factor, I'd stay away from them until the price comes down dramatically! I suspect that the newest 430 to 445 nm Nichia diodes are equally tempermental.
Also see the section: How Sensitive are Laser Diodes, Really?.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Alternatives - Diode Laser Modules, Laser Pointers Laser Pointers and Diode Laser Modules - The Low Stress Approach Where what you really want is a working visible diode laser, a commercial laser pointer or diode laser module may be the best option. Both of these include the driver circuit and will run off of unregulated low voltage DC. While the cost may be somewhat higher than that of a bare laser diode, the much reduced risk of blowout and built-in optics may be well worth the added cost. It doesn't take too many fried laser diodes to make up this cost difference! Believe me, it can get to be really frustrating very quickly blowing expensive laser diodes especially if you don't really know why they failed. This will be particularly true where the specifications of the laser diode and/or driver circuit are not entirely known - as is often the case. Helium-neon lasers are much more forgiving!
Buy one that accepts an unregulated input voltage. Otherwise, you can still have problems even if you run the device from a regulated power supply. All laser pointers and most (but not all) modules will be of this type. However, if you get a deal that is too good to be true, corners may have been cut. A proper drive circuit will be more than a resistor and a couple of capacitors!
To confirm that the driver is regulating, start with an input near the bottom of the claimed voltage range and increase it slowly. The brightness of your laser diode should be rock solid. If it continues to increase even within the supposedly acceptable range of input voltage, something is wrong with either the laser diode (it is incompatible with the driver or damaged) or driver (it actually requires a regulated input or is incorrectly set up for the laser diode you are using). Stop right here and rectify the situation before you blow (yet another) laser diode!
See the chapter: Laser and Parts Sources for a number of suppliers of both diode laser pointers and diode laser modules.
If you still aren't convinced that someone else should deal with laser diode drive design issues, the remainder of this chapter provides suggestions for integrated drive chips, sample circuits, and complete power supply schematics. But don't complain that you haven't been warned of the sensitive nature of laser diodes.
Power Regulators in Laser Pointers The following four possibilities exist for the laser diode drivers inside laser pointers. (Unless otherwise noted, this applies to red laser pointers, not the DPSS green types with their high power laser diode pump requirements.) Series resistor: There is no active regulator. A resistor limits current to a safe value with a fresh set of batteries. The laser diode is driven like an LED. As the batteries are drained, current decreases proportional to the difference between the battery voltage and the diode drop (about 2 V) divided by the resistances. Since output power and thus brightness would also decline dramatically with battery use, this approach is only found in the cheapest of laser pointers. See the section: Laser Pointer with a Resistor for a Regulator. Constant current: Laser diode current is set to a safe value between threshold and maximum. This takes care of battery voltage variations but still would have problems with changes in the laser diode output with temperature. This is rarely, if ever, found on red laser pointers but is used for green laser pointers since the high power pump diodes for the DPSS laser module do not have or need optical feedback for adequate regulation. Optical feedback - unregulated reference: Some laser diode drivers use the monitor photodiode to control laser diode current but do not have constant voltage source like a zener diode circuit to use as a reference. This is fairly safe for the laser diode as long as the correct battery types are used. For these, output brightness will vary somewhat with battery voltage and will thus decline as the batteries are drained. Optical feedback - regulated reference: The best designs (and all those using IC driver chips) will maintain nearly constant output power until the batteries are nearly exhausted. I'd expect to only see (3) and (4) in modern red laser pointers with (4) predominating in more modern designs. Expect (2) in green DPSS laser pointers (but many or most of these will also be pulsed).
Laser Pointer with a Resistor for a Regulator Visible laser diodes generally have very precise drive requirements. Too little current and they don't lase; too much current and they quickly turn into poor imitations of LEDs or die entirely. At least that's true of most of them. In order for a simple resistor to set the current precisely enough, it would have to be selected for each laser diode to limit the current to a safe value with fresh batteries over the expected temperature range. With only 5 to 10 percent between lasing threshold and maximum current for a typical visible laser diode, this could be impossible. Until recently, I had heard that this type of design (or lack thereof) has been used but had never seen such a simple circuit in a laser pointer. Apparently, visible laser diodes are now mass produced with a much larger range of current between threshold and operating limits - possibly engineered specifically for the ultra-cheap laser pointer market. (From [email protected].)
Well, I have in my hands a laser pointer that has only a resistor to limit the current instead of the transistorized circuits usually found. It have a 51 ohm SMD type resistor on the PCB in series with the power switch, the laser diode, and 3 LR44 batteries (1.5 V each).
In fact, the laser diode has no monitor photodiode at all - it have only 2 terminals. The metal case is open on the rear, so one can easily see the laser diode itself inside it. Interesting enough is that it is the only type of laser pointer that I can actually now find here (Brazil), but some years ago I bought some pointers having a complete regulator circuit.
(From: Sam.)
He's has sent me a sample, all the way from Brazil! Heck, it arrived faster than some of the stuff I send next door. :) As advertised, it certainly appears not to have anything inside other than a laser diode chip on a heat sink, 51 ohm surface mount resistor, on-off switch, and battery.
I have measured the I-V curve for both the overall circuit and just the laser diode. It is consistent with a 51 ohm series resistor and 20 ohm diode resistance with about a 2 V drop at just above 0 mA (the knee of the diode I-V curve). The threshold is around 15 mA and the operating current is 35 mA at 4.5 V (the normal battery voltage) - a rather wide range for a visible edge emitting diode. My hypothesis is that these laser diodes are specifically designed to have a wide operating range - possibly by reducing the reflectance of the output facet and thus the gain, possibly by varying the doping, or something else. So, efficiency is lower but with the benefit of increased tolerance to power supply current variation (though 35 mA for a few mW of output power is a very respectable value).
Someone else sent me a similar pointer and while I haven't actually measured its I-V curve, I expect that it behaves basically the same. These are both bullet-style pointers of obviously really cheap construction that came with 5 screw-in pattern heads (1 clear and 4 HOEs). Another better quality bullet-style pointer I have uses the normal laser diode in a can package with a regulated driver.
I also bought a couple dozen as-is pointers in a single lot on eBay which are all of this type.
Substituting Batteries in Laser Pointers My general recommendation would be to avoid this if possible but I do agree that having to spend huge $$$$ for those silly button cells can get to be annoying. :) "My laser pointer requires those little button cells which are really expensive and hard to find. I was wondering if I can instead connect 2 wires and make a battery pack for it using 3 AA batteries. Do all pointers have power regulators?" They all have some sort of regulation but it may not be adequate to deal with much of a change. You would have to check circuit to be sure or use batteries that are exactly the same maximum voltage. Even that isn't totally guaranteed as really dreadful designs could depend on the internal resistance of the batteries to limit current. So, replacing AAA Alkalines with D Alkalines could cause problems with some designs.
To be reasonably safe, you would have to measure the current using a fresh set of the recommended button cells and then add enough series resistance to make sure the current can never exceed this value even with brand new AAs (or whatever you are using).
Note that the much more complex and expensive green laser pointers should have decent regulation but they may still assume that nicely behaved batteries are used. Therefore, if adding an external power source to one of these, it is best to make sure it is well filtered, regulated, and has absolutely no overshoot during power cycling. Also see the next section.
Powering a Laser Pointer From an External Source Unlike high quality and expensive diode laser modules, laser pointers may have less than stellar internal regulation. Thus, you could easily destroy them instantly by attaching an external power supply, wall adapter, or even a higher capacity battery of the same voltage as the one used originally. Some pointers may even depend on the internal voltage drop inside the recommended (internal) batteries to provide some of the current regulation! So, if you really want to run a pointer from an external source, the best thing to do would be to measure the voltage across a fresh set of batteries powering the pointer and build a highly filtered, well regulated power supply to match it. The power supply must have absolutely no overshoot or undershoot when power cycling.
Another not quite as robust alternative is to obtain a wall adapter with an adequate current rating and slightly higher voltage rating than the pointer's battery. Then, add series resistance until the voltage at the pointer is the same as when powered with its internal battery. This is risky, however, since unless the wall adapter is regulated (few are), ripple, line voltage fluctuations, and power surges will get through it - and any of these can fry a laser diode in next to zero time.
Also note that a fancy regulated power adapter may actually be deadly to a laser pointer. Power supplies that include active components (those using switchmode or linear regulators as opposed to simple wall adapters with only a transformer, rectifier, and filter capacitor) may produce sub-microsecond (or longer) overvoltage spikes when power cycled (at power-on or power-off). These will have no effect on most electronic equipment but may be fatal to laser diodes.
As far as connecting the power supply: If you don't mind drilling a hole in the case or end-cap, construct a dummy battery with contacts at each end which you wire to your external power supply. Drill a hole in the side of the case, or better yet in the cap (but off to one side so the cap will still make proper contact with the battery if you decide to use the pointer with a battery in the future) to allow the pair of wires to pass through after the cap is screwed on. There are all sorts of ways of doing this. The connections have to be made to the center spring contact on the circuit board at the bottom of the battery compartment and the case. Make sure you get the polarity correct!
Also see the section: Power Regulators in Laser Pointers.
Blinking Laser Pointer or Diode Laser Module? With the wide availability of inexpensive laser pointers in particular, it would be nice if there were a way to make them do something more exciting than just project a steady red dot. Typical questions go something like:
"Hi is there any way I can make my laser pointer blink at an adjustable rate, something that will turn on/of maybe with the control of a adjustable resistor? Are there any schematics or something to help me out?" In principle, a simple circuit based on a 555 timer, for example, could be used to control power to the pointer or module - perhaps even just control a relay to act as the on/off button. In practice, whether this will work or not depends on the design of your laser pointer or diode laser module. Some have significant filtering and delays circuits inside which will make blinking at a useful rate impossible. Others will work fine. Still others will fail due to the repeated stress of on/off cycles.
Going any deeper into the circuitry than the batteries/power supply or on/off switch is definitely not for the beginner - if possible at all. Unfortunately, however, that may be necessary to achieve a useful result. For more info, see the sections of this chapter on laser diode power requirements, modulation, and the sample laser diode driver schematics.
(From: Peter Pan ([email protected]).)
Yes! I've used a simple 555 timer circuit driving an emitter follower transistor buffer amp, to drive several laser pointers. I've had little trouble recovering a near square wave at the receiving end with a phototransistor driven amplifier, up to about 5 kHz. After that, the residual energy stored in the laser module's driver circuit starts to degrade the square wave, but this can usually be extended, at least through the remainder of the audio range, by using a push-pull or complementary-symmetry type buffer, instead of a simple emitter follower. If you need to go beyond 4 kHz though, it is better to attempt to modulate the intensity rather then try to accomplish complete shut down/turn on.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Integrated Circuits for Driving Laser Diodes Laser Diode Drive Chips Many semiconductor manufacturers offer laser driver chips. Some of these support high bit rate modulation in addition to providing the constant current optically stabilized power supply. Other types of chips including linear and switching regulators can be easily adapted to laser diode applications in many cases. However, some of these chips are designed in such a way that they will work only at the high bit rates advertised maintaining a continuous carrier at all times or with a 50 percent average duty cycle or something equally annoying if all you want is a CW laser diode power supply or even one for low bit rate communications. You need to check the specs very carefully for non-standard (e.g., not covered in the datasheet or app-note) applications. Note: Free samples of ICs like laser diode drivers may be available for the asking even if you won't be buying a million parts in the future. Manufacturers often provide some means of requesting free samples at their web sites. Just be honest about your needs - they consider it good PR and you might just tell a friend or colleague who WILL buy a million parts!
Analog Devices (http://www.analog.com/) has several laser diode drivers including the AD9660 which provides for full current control using the photodiode for feedback and permits high speed modulation between two power levels. Burr-Brown (http://www.burr-brown.com/). (From: Steve White ([email protected]).)
We are using the OPA 2662 (Burr-Brown) for this. It is an OTA with 370MHz BW, 59 mA/ns SR, and can source/sink 75mA of current per channel (two channels per chip which may be paralleled quite easily). The part provides the emitter of the current source to an external pin (programming side of an internal current mirror), so that a single resistor sets the voltage-current transfer characteristic. Watch out for the dependence of the harmonic distortion specs upon the supplied current and frequency though...if this will be a problem for your particular application that is (didn't matter much for mine).
Elantec (http://www.elantec.com) offerings include the EL6251C and EL6258C which provide laser diode driver and sense circuitry. They support high speed control of laser diode current with selectable levels for read and write, optical feedback regulation, and protection from low power supply or open input conditions. These parts are intended for CD, CD-R, CD-RW, and other optical data storage applications. Another chip, the EL6270C, features an integrated high frequency modulator (HFM) oscillator to provide output current drive of up to 100 mA, an external resistor that controls the average laser diode output power, and a low power disable mode that powers down to 5 uA.
Complete datasheets are available at the Elantec Web site.
(From: Alan Wolke ([email protected]).) Check out the datasheets for several laser driver circuits available on the market for high speed fiber communications. See Maxim, HP, Sony, Philips, Fujitsu, Microcosm, etc. Also, there are many papers in Bell System Technical Journals that deal with other bias control schemes that don't involve optical feedback.
iC-Haus Corporation (http://www.ichauscorp.com/) offers several CW laser diode driver and controller chips. The complete datasheets are available on-line and include functional block diagrams and application information. These devices require only a few common external components and can be used for CW and modulation/pulsed operation up to several hundred kHz (depending on model). iC-Haus parts are available through electronics distributors. In addition to other information, there is a new White Paper on the design and test of fast laser diode drivers at http://www.ichaus.biz/wp4_fastlaserdriver or http://www.ichaus.biz/upload/pdf/DesignTestFastLaserDriverWP4en.pdf. Linear Technology (http://www.linear.com/). App Note AN52 (and probably others) includes a sample circuit using their one of their chips (not necessary dedicated laser drivers) for powering laser diodes. In AN52, the LT1110 Micropower DC-DC converter is used as the current regulator for operating from a 1.5 V battery. However, it is possible that behavior at low battery voltages might be undefined - and bad for the laser diode! I wonder if they tested for that? :(
There is an article in the November CQ magazine by WA2NDM entitled, "A Laser Diode Transmitter" which is based on AN52. However, his circuit uses an audio transformer to directly modulate the laser diode current and it would seem that without some additional protection, if someone were to accidentally drop or tap on the microphone - or power cycle the preamp - poof goes the laser diode! :(
Laser Diode Power Supply 3 (RE-LD3) uses a similar chip - the LT1054 DC-DC Converter, not for voltage stepup but to very effectively isolate the laser diode from input voltage spikes.
Maxim (http://www.maxim-ic.com/). The MAX3261 (1.2 Gbps), MAX3667 and MAX3766 (622 Mbps), and MAX3263 (155 Mbps) are examples of their highly integrated laser driver chips.
The Maxim Engineering Journal (a monthly or so publication you will receive if you have requested their CDROM and possibly included in trade rags like EDN and Electronic Design) sometimes has laser diode related articles. For example, the Special Fiber Optic Edition (early 1999) is devoted to applications of Maxim's high speed (622 Mbps and up!) optical interface components including laser diode drivers and sensors. (The Maxim application note Driving a Laser diode at 622 Mbps From a Single +3.3V Power Supply may be one of those from this publication.) The next issue I received, Volume 33, included a circuit similar to the one described in Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver.
Both Sharp and Mitsubishi manufacture IC's for driving laser diodes. Most will maintain constant power. Some require two voltages, others just one. These circuits will drive the common cathode lasers, or the Sharp "P" or the Mitsubishi "R" configuration which has the laser's cathode connected the the anode of the photo diode. The Sharp IR3C07 is a good for CW or analog modulation, and the IR3C08 or IR3C09 will allow digital modulation to 10 MHz. These parts are quite inexpensive. Some additional manufacturers of laser diode driver chips and modules include (this not a complete list!): Applied Micro Circuits Corp. France Telecom Research and Development Fujitsu Compound Semiconductor, Inc. Intersil Laser Diode, Inc. Lucent Technologies, Inc., Microelectronics Division Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. NTT Electronics Corp. NVG, Inc. OKI Semiconductor, Inc. Rockwell Microelectronics, Inc. Vitesse Semiconductor Corp. Xicor, Inc. Caution About Cheap Laser Diode Drivers The bottom line is that these should be fine for CW laser lights and laser pointer type applications but NOT for modulation as may be claimed by the distributors of these modules. (From: Art Allen, KY1K ([email protected]).)
I called a person I know who works for a major surplus house. He asked NOT to be identified. He did give me valuable information regarding the NS102 laser driver modules that are being sold for $3 each (in large quantities) on the internet.
Here's what I was told.
The NS102 is mass produced in Asia. The chip that the NS102 PCB is based on is unknown, and probably made in Taiwan too. There are no specs for it. Only DC parameters are given on the 'rough spec' sheet (advertising quality literature) the sellers give you.
They do work and they work well.
They use low power and they are stable-if the voltage in changes from 4v to 8v, the LD output remains fairly constant.
(From: Sam.)
The following is apparently not quite correct. According to someone who works with NVG, they can be modulated at up to 2 MHz. See the section: Comments on Some Commercial Drivers and Detectors
(From: Art.)
However, they are NOT suitable for modulation of laser diodes and should only be used as a laser pen power supply!
I have an email from a vendor here which sparked all this speculation regarding their suitability for our purposes. The email CLAIMS they can be driven to 12 Mhz output pulses while maintaining FULL APC (not average output monitoring as they do in fiber optic drivers). As far as I can tell, this is just plain a lie and no one should purchase these expecting to modulate a laser diode for communications purposes.
They are probably little more than the standard 2 transistor laser driver that can be used for a laser pointer because it is heavily bypassed with a heavy duty slow start ramp up circuit.
Some vendors are now selling these for $20 in small quantities - don't get taken in - it's a laser pointer driver and NOTHING MORE.
If anyone has better info or has tested one of these on the bench, please let me know. I'd really like to get info on the chip contained on the PCB too.
Comments on Some Commercial Drivers and Detectors (Portions from: Martin Stone ([email protected]).) The following refers to chips available from NVG, Inc. and other resellers of their products. See the section: Mail Order - Lasers, Laser Parts, Optics, Accessories for more info on NVG.
The NVG laser driver circuit was originally designed for CW only. While I did not design the driver circuit, I was able to find a way to get it to modulate successfully up to 2 MHz. I have successfully built a free-space FM modulated data/voice transmission system using the NVG laser modules (diode, driver, collimator, enclosure) already set and burned in).
In addition I have helped a number of customers from around the world (Spain, Italy, Switzerland and the US) use the NVG modules in a modulated design.
While the NS102 type driver circuit does have a 0.1 uF capacitor to act as a 'soft on'/filter protection of the laser diode, by providing enough voltage to keep the module/laser just below the threshold, you can modulate the NVG modules (or any suitable diode attached to the NS102 driver) up to 2 MHz. At that point, it seems that the capacitor effectively filters the modulation and the circuit 'saturates' and only produces CW output.
Another strategy is to 'inverse' modulate the module - that is, keep the module effectively on with the modulation signal causing a decrease in power - rather than have the laser off with modulation causing an increase in signal....
See A Simple PLL Based FM Diode Laser Module Modulator for an example of one approach that works with the NS102.<
(From John Sojak ([email protected]).)
As far as modulation is concerned, the Analog Devices driver is hard to beat for three bucks. Couple that with a 555 and a battle proven LM317 front end and cry 'BINGO'. Maxim used PECL inputs ... arrgh! I don't need to spit photon packets at 150 mhz! Linear Tech IR receiver looks good, although the $7.00 price tag + a handful of linear doesn't really appeal to me. Too bad you can't get inside the Epoxy covered die in the Sharp TV/VCR consumer IR receiver modules (apx $1.50/100 pcs). Not everyone in the world wants to decode bursts of 40 kHz back into data!
Oh, by the way - an Optek BP812 Optologic sensor performs quite well at at 760 nm. It's an active device available in either totem pole or open collector outputs. The applications guy at Optek says the device won't work at 760 but looking at the response curve, I disagree. It's response is only down about 10% in the reds! Most silicon photo stuff is down about 60-75% at 760ish nm. From what I have seen, the device is very usable at 760 nm. Useful part for red diodes and HeNe stuff.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. More on Laser Diode Characteristics and Drivers Comments on Driver Education for Laser Diode Driver Designers (From: Jonathan Bromley ([email protected]).) This is getting a little scary. Laser diodes have been around for a good few years now, and I thought it was fairly widely known how you make them go and (harder) keep going for a long time; but there have been several postings recently from folk who are busy making themselves poorer by driving lasers inappropriately. Here are the rules on how you do it right:
Just because it isn't hot doesn't mean you didn't already fry it. Unlike most other things, running them at the "typical" data sheet values won't work. I'm not talking suboptimal here; I mean that it won't work, not even a little bit. You must never, never, never exceed the full rated *optical* power output of the laser, not even for a fraction of a microsecond. If you do, your laser will be degraded or dead. This means LOTS of careful design to avoid nasty switch-on and switch-off transients, for example. Use the built-in monitor photodiode to regulate the light output. This monitor diode looks at the leaked light from the back facet of the laser (a few percent of the useful front-facet output). The current through it is nicely proportional to light output, if you have a reasonable reverse bias voltage on it. Anything from 2V to 15V reverse bias is usually OK (on the photodiode; *never* reverse bias a laser diode!) The basic problem comes from the characteristics of the laser device. They are a bit like LEDs, so you will see a forward voltage of about 2.2V for almost any reasonable forward current (just like an LED, but the voltage is somewhat higher). Voltage drive is therefore an exceedingly bad idea. Current drive is a bit more predictable. Up to a certain current - the laser threshold current - you will get the device acting like a feeble LED. Above the threshold current, laser operation starts properly and the light output rises very rapidly as a function of current. Something like this:
        ^ Light Output         |         |         |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -* ---- Maximum Rated Light Output         |                            *|         |                           *         |                          *  |         |                         *         |                        *    |         |                       *         |                      *      |        -|*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-------+--------------> Forward Current         |                     |   ��   |                                 |       |<-- Maximum Current                               |                               |<-- Threshold Current
The snag is, the difference between threshold and maximum current is usually quite small; no more than 10% or 20% of the threshold. The threshold current varies greatly from one device to another (even within the same type number) and also varies with temperature. Result: setting a fixed current value is doomed to failure. For some lasers, and on some days, it will be under the threshold and no laser action will occur; on other days, it will be over the maximum current and your precious laser will turn into a useless LED (like the original posting in this thread). The only safe way is to use the monitor diode current to servo the light output. Even this isn't ideal because the monitor current is different for different lasers, but: It doesn't vary significantly with temperature; Many laser manufacturers give you a test sheet with each device stating the actual monitor current for full output; You can provide an adjustment anyway. But BE CAREFUL. Transient overdriving, even for very short times, can seriously damage the lasers. Transients commonly occur: because your feedback circuit rings (or worse. oscillates) so that the drive current occasionally exceeds the maximum. because of PSU on/off transients. because you have used a socket for the laser, and the photodiode connection is flaky: if it comes disconnected, your feedback circuit will think there isn't enough drive to the laser and will crank up the current to destruction level. because you are trying to modulate the laser brightness with some AC signal and either you overdo it, or the feedback circuit overshoots. because you have a pot. somewhere in the circuit to adjust for full output, and its wiper is noisy. Above all, remember that it is excessive light output that destroys lasers. The heating effect of the drive current is not a big problem except that it has the effect of pushing the threshold current down. Excessive light levels, on the other hand, can damage the tiny end mirrors of the lasing crystal. Sharp (one of the big suppliers of laser diodes) also make some nifty 8-pin drive chips that are pretty good if you don't need to modulate the laser rapidly. For modulation, consider setting the light output close to 50% of full output using a really slooooowww-responding feedback circuit, and then impressing a fixed-amplitude modulating current on the laser. This is OK because the gradient of the light/current graph is reasonably predictable for any given laser type, so it's possible to calculate a suitable safe modulating current from the data sheet.
Good luck to all - and don't forget the eye safety regulations.
(From: Paul Mathews ([email protected]).)
Laser diode structures are usually so small that damage thresholds are very low on every dimension. The general approach to protecting them is to series AND shunt filter (and/or clamp) supply voltages to limit the voltage compliance of current source driving circuits. Also, consider having some of the current limiting be by means of an actual resistor rather than just active circuitry. The parasitic capacitances in active driving circuitry can interact with dv/dt on supply lines to turn on the drive circuit (e.g., drain to gate capacitance with MOSFET drive), so the resistor limits current even when this happens. Using bypass capacitance local to the pulse current loop has the dual benefit of absorbing residual transients and avoiding any effects of upstream series filter components on speed.
(From: Mark W. Lund ([email protected]).
You can blow out the laser in nanoseconds if there is enough voltage and/or power in the pulse. Two methods: electrostatic discharge type damage which punches holes in the cavity; brief high power which damages the front facet.
Make sure that the power supply to the modulation circuit is filtered to prevent surges, isolate the signal circuit to prevent surges on the input line from getting to the laser.
There are an infinite number of ways to get a damaging pulse. Most common is the power supply. It helps to have a scope capable of capturing transients for this. The other ones that I will admit to: using a circuit that wasn't grounded to the metal optical table--brushing the table with one line of the circuit and oops; a commercial laser diode power supply that was clean until we used it in computer control mode when it sent out very fast (anhard to see) spikes; hooking the laser up backwards; using a power supply that had a big capacitor across the output which had enough charge in it to do damage; and forgetting to put a peltier cooled laser on a heat sink (the more current I gave the cooler the hotter the laser got....oops.)
Well, that was embarrassing, but I hope it encourages others to save a few (laser diode) lives.
(From: K. Meehan ([email protected]).)
Semiconductor lasers are very sensitive to power spikes. The level of current that is a problem depends on the laser structure and how much of the current is converted into optical power vs. heat. In general, reverse current spikes are very damaging, no matter what level. Make sure that you are modulating the diode so that you go below laser threshold but not below 0V. In the forward direction, very short overshoots (<1microseconds) in current can be handled until you blow the facet off of the device (catastrophic optical damage - COD). Longer pulse overshoots aren't any better. The current level that damage occurs varies from device to device. I tend to recommend less than 10% overshoot in all cases. COD is very easy to note, just look at the laser (while it is not operating) under a microscope. The facet coating is damaged near the emission region, if there is a coating. Otherwise, you will see an enhanced region (darker area) when looking under Nomarski - maybe not so easy to see.
Another problem that you might be having is spiking during start-up or shut-down of the device. Current supplies that look lovely during operation sometimes have spikes in the output when you turn them on or off. You might want to short the device, making sure that there is no bounce during the shorting, before turning your supply on or off. There are several laser diode driver companies out there that make current generators with slow starts and minimal overshoots. Avtech, Melles Griot, ILX Lightwave, WAvelength Electronics, etc.
Variations in Laser Diode Monitor Photodiode Current Sensitivity It would be nice if the monitor photodiodes associated with all laser diodes had the same sensitivity - or even were consistent for a given model. But, unfortunately, this is not the case. "I am designing a driver circuit for a laser diode (NEC NDL3220S). The problem is that the spec sheet says the output of the monitor photodiode at rated power is max: 0.5 ma, typical: 0.3 ma, min 0.1 ma, at 5 V. This is a huge range! If I set for 0.3 ma and the actual output is 0.1 mA I will burn out the laser. I do not have equipment for calibrating the laser output directly." (From: Alan Wolke ([email protected]).) Welcome to the wonderful world of laser diodes! You'll find that a 5:1 range in monitor current is typical, with even a full order of magnitude being common! This is one reason why most laser diode based applications have a provision for trimming/tuning the driver circuit to the particular laser.
Your safest bet is to design the feedback loop to operate with less than the minimum monitor current, and provide the ability to actively tune it to the appropriate operating point. Thankfully, the relationship between output power and monitor current will remain reasonably constant over the lifetime of each particular device. So, once it is properly set, you're done.
Response Time of Laser Diode and Monitor Photodiode (From: Derek Weston ([email protected]).) For those of us who have performed the infamous LD to LED (LD->DELD) conversion more often than we'd like, there's an interesting item mentioned near the end of the article: Visible-Laser Driver Has Digitally Controlled Power And Modulation regarding LD drivers. It points out two important characteristics of LDs:
The monitor photodiode is often slower than the LD, and The laser diode start time is greatly increased if the LD starts from zero rather than an LED-level current flow. Wish I'd seen this two years ago! (From: John, K3PGP ([email protected]).)
For high speed data and very high frequency RF subcarrier/video work I've always biased my laser diodes to 1/2 laser power then modulated them near 100%, much the same as a standard AM radio transmitter. This does result in a faster response time rather than cutting the LD completely off. It's also probably a bit easier on the laser diode especially if it's a high power unit. (Mine draws 1 amp when putting out 500 mw.)
I never tried biasing it down to BELOW laser threshold at the 'LED' level. Although this would be an improvement over cutting it off completely, I would think this would be slower than biasing to 1/2 laser power.
(From: Sam.)
Also see the section: Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver which has a bit more on the circuit mentioned above.
Power Changes With Collimating Optics When adding (or removing) external optics, reflections back into the laser diode itself must be taken into consideration. These can have two effects: Altering the amount of light hitting the monitor photodiode inside the laser diode package. This will change the power level setting if the APC (Automatic Power Control) circuit is being used (as it should be in most cases). Destabilizing the lasing process due to reflected light entering the laser cavity. This effect actually may be more common with low power laser diodes than one would think. See the section: Causes of Laser Pointer Output Power Changing When Directed at a Mirror. However, where the behavior is repeatable and stable, I'd be more inclined to believe it is the simpler explanation, above. Note that the losses in the optics are usually only a minor factor where the power decreases. Even uncoated surfaces reflect only about 4 percent so if you are getting a 30 percent decrease in power, this probably isn't the cause! CAUTION: If you remove the optics from a diode laser module, the power may increase resulting in laser diode destruction, especially if the unit is being run near its maximum ratings.
(From: Frank DeFreitas ([email protected]).)
The information sheet for a Power Techologies 35 mW module states in bold capital letters not to even ADJUST the collimation while the diode is running at full power!
I've got a little 10 mW, 635 nm diode that I tested with and without optics. Here are the initial readings:
Without Collimating Optics: 10.8 mW. With Collimating Optics: 10.5 mW. (I actually expected more of a drop here.) It is interesting to note that the second reading WITHOUT optics was 3.8 mW and the third reading 2.6 mW. The barrel was becoming very hot. I killed the power before I killed the diode (I'm learning!). So this particular diode (from NVG, Inc.) obviously was set up with the collimating optics in place NEEDS the feedback (reflection) for the photodiode to control the current.
Using an External Photodiode for Power Control There is no law that says the internal monitor photodiode must be used in the driver optical feedback circuit. For some applications, it is desirable to substitute an external one or use both together. This could be used to control beam power based on some mechanical condition like position or angle or to compensate for variations in the behavior of the external optics. You can't modify a sealed diode laser module in this manner unless it already has a modulation input but if you are building something from components, it should be possible. Loop stability must take into account optical path delays if the distance between the laser diode and photodiode is significant but this shouldn't be a problem unless you are also trying to modulate the thing at a very high rate. Obviously, any such scheme must assure that the external photodiode always intercepts enough of the beam and/or that a hard limit is imposed by feedback from the *internal* monitor photodiode to assure that the laser diode specifications are not exceeded under any conditions. Otherwise, even an errant dust particle or house fly wondering into the portion of the beam path used for feedback could ruin your laser diode!
Driving High Power Laser Diodes Laser diodes in the several hundred mW to multi-watt range which do not have internal monitor photodiodes have a different set of issues with respect to safe (for the laser diode, that is) drive circuits. The dire warnings about instant destruction from overcurrent still apply but but the extreme non-linearity typical of low power laser diodes isn't usually present with higher power devices. There is still a lasing threshold but above this, the output power increases linearly with current and there is likely to be decent consistency from unit to unit. However, proper current control and temperature compensation (or adequate derating) is still essential.
(From: Art Allen, KY1K ([email protected]).)
When you get into the 1 amp diodes (or anything over 200 or 300 mw), the driver becomes less dependent on the laser power feedback PD and many of these higher powered diodes just don't have the power sensing PD on-board for this reason.
While the threshold current is still very dependent on the temperature of the diode, the DIFFERENCE between the max current and the smoke release current widens a lot - meaning that the larger diodes can be operated fairly safely without sampling the output and applying variable current based on the power sensing PD.
The 1 watt diodes that I was trying to buy several years ago had 2 sets of specs-one at ambient room temperature and the other set for diodes at actual operating temperatures-the inference being that the preferred driver needed TEMPERATURE feedback in order to ramp the diode up to operating temperature.
Note that these diodes were used to drive fiber optic cables where they operate as an FM transmitter (constant carrier/fixed duty cycle transmit), so they probably used a time delay circuit to ramp them up to temperature rather than an actual temperature sensor.
Where the diode (probably) isn't on constantly, it might be necessary to derate the diodes and operate them just above threshold in order to be safe.
For your high power diodes, you can use a simple constant current driver (assuming the diode doesn't require PD based power sensing feedback.
The Vishay Siliconix catalog has an ABSOLUTELY O-U-T-S-T-A-N-D-I-N-G technical description of MOSFET based constant current source design. You can request the hard copy of the catalog from their website, make sure you get the full catalog with the ap notes. (I couldn't find this on the Vishay Web site but it may be: "AN103 - The FET Constant-Current Source/Limiter". Feeding "Vishay AN103" to a search engine should return the PDF.)
(From: John, K3PGP ([email protected]).)
I'm presently using the power supply under Biasing & Modulating Laser Diodes - Safely ! on my Web site with a Russian-made 1 watt 810 nm laser diode. The diode looks like one of those old time big metal (TO-3 ?) transistors but with a hole in the top of it. The series resistor in this case was made up out of a bunch of parallel connected 1 watt 33 ohm resistors. I think I ended up with around 10 to 12 in parallel. This allows me to adjust the laser current in small increments by adding or subtracting from the number of 33 ohm resistors. It also solved the problem of trying to find the exact value I needed in a high wattage resistor. (Wattage rating goes up as you parallel resistors, resistance goes down.)
I ended up feeding half of the 33 ohm resistors from one 7805 voltage regulator and the other half from a second 7805. Even though one 7805 can handle one amp of current it began to show signs of thermal drift when running at this level. By splitting the resistor bank in half each regulator only needs to supply 1/2 amp.
A 808 nm 500 mW laser diodes are visible but barely. Do NOT be fooled into thinking it's not really putting out much power. Human eyes aren't that sensitive to 800 nm radiation BUT you can easily burn a hole clean through your retina with this much power. If you doubt this, try focusing your 808 nm 500 mw laser on the black plastic part of a VHS video cassette and see what it does. When I do this with mine I get instant smoke and liquid plastic. So, BE CAREFUL especially when focusing this diode down to a small spot.
When playing around with stuff like this you will notice that color has a LOT to do with how much energy is absorbed. Aiming the same laser at the while label on the same cassette resulted in nothing happening. There is a very important principal to be learned by this experiment. If the white label isn't absorbing much power from the laser beam then it has to be going some place else. The answer of course is it's being reflected (scattered) back from the white surface. Keep this in mind when playing around with this diode. If you hit something that's even remotely reflective you could end up with the beam coming right back at you and you might not even be aware of it since the human eye is not very sensitive to radiation in the 800 nm region.
For communications use you might want to consider expanding the beam. This will lower the power density and make it a LOT safer if you accidentally get in the beam. The beam exiting mine is approx. 4 inches in diameter. 500 mw spread across a 4 inch diameter circle is a LOT less dangerous than 500 mw focused down to 1 mm in diameter!!!
And remember that a 500 mW 808 nm laser diode needs a GOOD heatsink. If you notice the power dropping off shortly after you turn the laser on your heatsink is too small! If you are having problems with this and you don't have room for a bigger heatsink use a small 12 VDC fan. Try to direct the air across the heatsink and NOT across the optics!
You can monitor power output with a regular silicon solar cell hooked directly to a milliamp meter (not a voltmeter!!!). Do NOT use any series resistor between the solar cell and meter. Expect to see over 100 ma of current at this power level. I also suggest you expand the beam to make use of most of the surface of the solar cell. If you focus it down to a small diameter the power density goes up and you just might burn a hole in the solar cell! Plus a very narrow diameter beam could easily bounce off the shiny surface of the solar cell and hit you in the eyes with enough power density to do some real damage! Watch the angle between the solar cell and the laser and anticipate where the reflection might fall. You will get the same power reading no matter what the beam diameter is as long as all the energy hits the solar cell. You can substitute a white piece of paper to get some idea of beam diameter but be CAREFUL when doing this!
Treat this laser with respect. Anticipate reflections. Keep people, animals and airplanes out of it's path and above all THINK before you turn it on!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Testing Laser Diode Driver Circuits Sam's Laser Diode Test Supply 1 This is a basic power supply using a pair IC regulators to provide a variable voltage with adjustable current limit. Rather than combining these functions a brute force regulator pair is used - one for the voltage and the other for the current limit. The idea is to be able to safely test laser diodes or complete drivers with the ability to limit current initially to a guaranteed safe value until circuit operation and/or laser diode behavior can be determined. This should substitute for an expensive lab supply for testing of lower power devices.
The circuit is shown in Sam's Laser Diode Test Supply 1 (SG-LT1). As drawn, it is suitable for laser diodes requiring between about 25 and 250 mA. With obvious changes to certain part values, the same circuit should be usable at up to an amp or more - but I won't be responsible for any destruction of expensive laser diodes that might result!
More modern lower dropout regulators like the LT1084 can be substituted for the LM317. For load currents above about 100 mA continuous, heat sinks will be required on the IC regulators.
The addition of a voltmeter might be desirable though the knob position of the voltage adjust pot corrected for the voltage drop of the current limit regulator will probably be good enough
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Very Basic Laser Diode Power Supplies Bare Bones Laser Diode Power Supply With care, a very basic power supply can be used to safely drive low and medium power laser diodes. The supply I have used to test diodes up to about 2 A is very basic consisting of a Variac, transformer, bridge rectifier, and filter capacitor with a current limiting resistor. For low power diodes, this is typically 50 to 250 ohms; for high power diodes, it is 8 ohms, 50 watt. A bleeder resistor assures that the filter capacitors discharge quickly once power is removed. A built in voltmeter shows the voltage into the current limiting resistor at all times. Using the equation: I=(V-2)/R (2 is the estimated voltage drop of the diode, R is the current limiting resistor) is often close enough. Adding a shorting relay which required a press of a button to re-enable when power is applied would further reduce the risk of accidentally overdriving the diode.
Since there is no active regulation, the output current has some 120 Hz ripple so the peak current may be slightly higher than the measured current. Installing a current meter (A or mA as appropriate) would be more precise but unless running near the maximum specifications of the diode, isn't really essential.
Battery Power for Laser Diodes Batteries are in fact a relatively safe alternative to sophisticated power supplies if their characteristics are well understood. Since a properly connected battery can never put out more than its rated voltage when new or fully charged, and can't produce reverse polarity, all that is needed is current limiting via a high power resistor. I would still recommend a 0.1 uF capacitor, 1N4148 reverse protection diode, and 100 ohm resistor directly across the diode though. Here are some guidelines:
A new or fully charged battery can have substantially more voltage than the nominal rating. For example, a new Alkaline is around 1.57 V, not 1.5 V. A NiCd may start out at 1.3 V or more when fully charged. Don't get too greedy and use a battery voltage close to the diode voltage, include a reasonable size current limiting resistor and use a higher battery voltage. The internal resistance of NiCd and NiMH batteries is quite low and should never be depended upon for a significant part of the current limiting. CAUTION: There must NOT be any filter capacitance in the power supply after the current limiting resistor. This is to minimize the chance that a bad connection to the diode will result in excessive current should such a capacitor charge to a much higher voltage and then discharge through the diode without current limiting.
It's fine to trickle charge a battery while it's being used since regardless of line voltage fluctuations and spikes, not much will happen to the battery voltage. However, due to the internal resistance of the battery, fast charging may not isolate the output enough. Better to implement a double buffering scheme where one battery is being charged while the other is in use, switching using a relay with an electrolytic capacitor to hold the voltage for the millisecond or so when the output is disconnected from either battery. The voltage of Alkaline batteries drops steadily as they are used while that of NiCd and NiMH batteries is nearly constant until they are fully discharged. Without an active regulator, this must be taken into account. To vary the current with no active components, a high power rheostat or selector switch must be used. Make sure it's wired so that intermittent contact can't result in current spikes. For example, to drive a typical IR laser diode, a pair of D-size Alkaline cells can be used in series with a power resistor. For a 1 W (rated) laser diode which has a threshold of 350 mA, voltage drop of 1.8 V, and slope efficiency of 0.8, an output power from near 0 mW to 1 W can be selected as follows:
  Resistor    Current     Pout --------------------------------     3  (1W)    400 mA     40 mW     2  (1W)    600 mA    200 mW   1.5  (2W)    800 mA    360 mW     1  (2W)   1200 mA    680 mW   0.75 (2W)   1600 mA   1000 mW Output power shown is approximate and depends on specific diode's threshold current and slope efficiency.
Double check polarity and take appropriate safety precautions!
Testing with a Laser Diode Simulator If you do build these or any other circuits for driving a laser diode, test them first with a combination of visible (or IR) LEDs and one or more silicon diodes (to simulate the approximate expected voltage drop) and a discrete photodiode to verify current limited operation. To accommodate the higher current of laser diodes compared to LEDs, use several identical LEDs in parallel with small balancing resistors to assure equal current sharing:
   COM o--------------+-------+-------+-------+---------+                     __|__   __|__   __|__   __|__      _|_               LEDs  _\_/_   _\_/_   _\_/_   _\_/_ ---> /_\ Photodiode                       |       |       |       |         |                       /       /       /       /         +----o PD                     5 \     5 \     5 \     5 \                       /       /       /       /                       \       \       \       \            1N4002     |       |       |       |     LD o-----|<|------+-------+-------+-------+
Note that the sensitivity of this photodiode to the LED emission will vary considerably depending on its position and orientation. Tape the photodiode and one of the LEDs together (sort of like a homemade opto-isolator) to stabilize and maximize the response. Where the laser diode current is below 20 or 30 mA, a suitable opto-coupler could also be used (see below).
Using this 'laser diode simulator', it will really only be possible to confirm that the laser driver current regulator is functional, not to actually set it up for your laser diode.
Once the circuit has been debugged, power down, and carefully install the laser diode. Double check all connections!
Use the guidelines below in both cases (written assuming an actual laser diode is being used):
Set the power adjustment of the laser driver to minimum (usually maximum resistance). If available, use a power supply with both voltage and current limit adjustments. Then, you can start with the voltage set to 0 and the current limit set just above the expected laser threshold current (plus the current drawn by the rest of the circuit - test with no laser diode in place). This can always be increased later. Attach a voltmeter between the photodiode (PD) terminal and ground. This will effectively monitor relative optical power output. If you have a (separate) current meter, put it in series with the power supply as well (or provide another means of measuring current).
CAUTION: Use clip leads. Leave the meters in place - do not attempt to change connections while the circuit is powered as this could result in a momentary current spike which may damage the laser diode.
Increase input voltage gradually. Once the laser diode starts lasing, the PD voltage should climb. The circuit should regulate when the PD voltage approaches the reference: 2.5 minus .7 V in circuits (1)-(3) or .5 Vcc for circuit (4). Then, the PD voltage and supply current should level off. If something doesn't behave as expected, shut down and determine why. Once you are confident that the circuit is operating properly with the laser diode installed, the output power can be increased modestly. But, without a laser power meter, DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK! For visible laser diodes, if you have a laser pointer or other visible diode laser module OF THE SAME WAVELENGTH, A-B brightness comparisons can be made if the beams are the same diameter. Otherwise, don't push your luck unless you have a bucketload of laser diodes you can afford to blow! For IR laser diodes, visible light eyeballs won't work. The tiny red dot that may be visible from an IR laser diode cannot be used as an accurate indication of power output. Laser diodes are generally NOT very forgiving. However, if you take your time and make sure you understand exactly what is happening at every step along the way, you and your laser diode will survive to light another day!
Art's Laser Diode Simulator (From: Art Allen, KY1K ([email protected]).) The Hewlett Packard HCPL4562 optocoupler appears excellent for incorporation into your laser diode simulator.
It is an LED optoisolator with a PD output stage. The PD is available by itself (without current amp transistor) or a moderate gain transistor is available (base/PD, emitter and collector)-so it's very flexible. The oveerall combination of LED, PD and output transistor has a 17 Mhz bandwidth rating.
My feeling was that the PD (standalone) should be used as we are trying to simulate a PD device itself that is normally inside the LD assy.
The goal is to be able to make the simulator have the same PD sensitivity as the actual LD/PD combination to be used. I think this is doable without adding a lot of complexity.
It should make a fairly nice little test jig! It could be made with a series pot to control LED current (until the proper drive level is available at the PD output). Several LED's could be switched in/out with a simple DIP switch, I'm thinking about a self powered flashing LED which could simulate a variable load for testing dynamic response at slow speeds-which could speak volumes about some driver circuits::>
A quick and dirty audio monitor on the LD current would be neat too-you wouldn't have to depend on your eyes to tell you if the drive becomes unstable or drifts up/down.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Schematics of Laser Diode Power Supplies The first five circuits are from published circuit diagrams or application notes, or were reverse engineered from actual devices. All use visible laser diodes though IR types would work with at most minor modifications to biasing points. Laser drivers (1) to (3) were from CW laser lights used for positioning in medical applications. Laser driver (4) was from a UPC bar code scanner.
Errors may have been made in the transcription. The type and specifications for the laser diode assembly (LD and PD) are unknown.
The available output power of these devices was probably limited to about 1 mW but the circuits should be suitable for the typical 3 to 5 mW maximum power visible laser diode (assuming the same polarity of LD and PD or with suitable modifications for different polarity units).
Of the 5 designs presented below, I would probably recommend "Laser diode power supply 2" as a simple but solid circuit for general use. It doesn't require any special chips or other hard to obtain parts. However, I would add a reverse polarity protection diode (e.g., 1N4002) in series with the positive input of the power supply.
In fact, funny that you should ask. :-)
An enhanced version of this design including a printed circuit board (PCB) layout is presented in the section: Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1).
A very basic and a high power laser diode drive circuit are also included (both open loop - no optical feedback) as well as one that can be programmed for 1024 levels of output intensity.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Toshiba Laser Diode Power Supply (TO-LD1) The actual laser driver portion of circuits (1) to (3) as well as the one presented in the section: Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1) is very similar to the basic design provided in a Toshiba application note named something like: "Example Driving Circuit for TOLD92xx Series Visible Laser Diodes". The Toshiba Laser Diode Driver Schematic was scanned from the application note by Kent C. Brodie ([email protected]) who also provides a Circuit Description. The schematic is reproduced in ASCII, below:
 Vcc o-----------+------------+-----------------------+--------+------+                  |            |                       |        |      |                  |            |    Power Adjust      _|_     __|__    |                  |            |       R2 10K      PD /_\  LD _\_/_    |                  |            \     +----+            |        |      |                  |         R1 /     |    |            |        |     _|_ C2                  |        610 \     +---/\/\--+-------+        /     --- 1uF                  |            /     |         |                \ R3   |                  |            |     |         |                / 15   |                +_|_           |     |       __|__              \      |             C1  ---           |     |     E /   \ C            |      |           22uF - |            +-----|------' Q1  '-------+     +------+                  |            |     |      2SA1015       |    C|                  |            |     |       (PNP)        |   |/ Q2                  |           _|_.   |                    +---|  2SC1959                  |      VR1 '/_\    |                    |   |\ (NPN)                  |     2.2V   |     |               C3 +_|_   E|                  |            |     |             10uF  ---    |                  |            |     |                  - |     |                  |            |     |                    |     |  Gnd o-----------+------------+-----+--------------------+-----+
This circuit lacks some of the protective features of the circuits, below, but is clearly the same core design.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1) This is the circuit from a Scanditronix "Diolase 1" laser line generator, a unit designed for patient positioning in medical diagnostic and treatment applications like radiation therapy. No, it doesn't actually engrave the patient but just projects a red line to aid in placing the patient on the couch and adjusting couch position in relation to semi-indelible ink marks drawn on the skin surface. It will run from a (wall adapter) power supply of about 6 to 9 VDC.
           D1  Vcc o-----|>|-------+-----------+-------------------+--------+-----+           1N4001     |           |                   |        |     |          Rev. Prot.  |           |    Pwr Adj       _|_     __|__  _|_ C4                      |           /   R3 10K (2)  PD /_\  LD _\_/_  --- .01uF                      |       R2  \     +----+        |        |     |                      |      560  /     |    |        |        |     |                      |           \     +---/\/\--+---+        +-----+                      |           |     |         |                  |                      |           |     |         +-------||---+     /                    +_|_          |     |       __|__   C2 (1) |     \ R4                 C1  ---          |     |     E /   \ C 100pF  |     / 3.9               10uF - |           +-----|------' Q1  '---------+     |                      |           |R    |    BC328-25 (5)      |    C|                      |       +---+     |       (PNP)          |   |/ Q2 (5)                      |       |  _|_.   |                      +---|  BD139                      |   VR1 +-'/_\    |                      |   |\ (NPN)                      |   LM431   |     |                 C3 +_|_   E|                      |   2.5V    |     |               10uF  ---    |                      |   (3)     |     |X                   - |     |            R1 3.9    |           |     |Y                     |     |  Gnd o------/\/\-----+-----------+-----+----------------------+-----+
Note the heavy capacitive filtering in this circuit. Changes would be needed to enable this circuit to be modulated at any reasonable rate. Notes:
Capacitor C4 value estimated. Potentiometer R3 measured at 6K. LM431 shunt regulator set up as 2.5 V reference. A 2.5 V zener or even a visible LED could also be used. Supply current measured at 150 mA (includes power on LED not shown). Transistor types do not appear to be critical.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 2 (RE-LD2) This is the circuit from a Scanditronix "Diolase 2" laser line generator, similar to the Diolase 1 described in the section: Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1) but containing a pair of diode laser modules, normally adjusted to produce a horizontal and vertical line. It appears to be an improved design including a soft-start (ramp-up) circuit and an inductor in series with the laser diode. Otherwise, it is virtually identical and will run from a 6 to 9 VDC source. Since both units were from the same company, I assume that these refinements were added as a result of reliability problems with the previous design - in fact, I have recently discovered that the unit from which I traced that schematic is not as bright as it should be!
Interestingly, there does not appear to be any reverse polarity protection on the input - I don't know why that would have been removed! C1 and Q1, at least, would likely let their smoke out if the power supply was connected backwards. But Jon Singer added it in his redrawn version, Laser Diode Power Supply Schematic 2 (RE-LD2), (if you don't like the ASCII schematic below!)
          2SC517 (NPN) (6) Vcc o----+--.  Q1 .---+---------+---------------+--------+----+-----+          |  _\___/_E  |         |               |        |    |     |          |     |      |         |              _|_     __|__  \ R5 _|_ C4       R1 \     |      |         |           PD /_\  LD _\_/_  / 1K --- .01uF     3.3K /     |      |         /               |        |    \     |  (2)          \     |      |     R2  \               |        |    |     |          |     |      |    390  /         R3    |        +----+-----+          |     |      |         \    +---/\/\---+--+                |          +-----+      |         |    |   2.2K      |                +                |      |         |    |             +----||----+      )                |    +_|_ C2     |    |           __|__ C3 (1) |      ) L1                |     --- 33uF   |    |   R4    E /   \  47pF  |      ) (3)                |    - |         +----|--/\/\----' Q2  '-------+     +                |      |         |R   |  220   BC328-25 (6)    |     |           C1 +_|_     |     +---+    \           (PNP)        |   |/ Q3 (6)          1uF  ---     |     |  _|_.  /<-+ R6                  +---|  BD139              - |      | VR1 +-'/_\   \  | 10K                 |   |\ (NPN)                |      | LM431   |    |  | Power Adjust   C5 +_|_   E|                |      | 2.5 V   |    +--+ (4)          10uF  ---    |                |      | (5)     |    |X                     - |     |                |      |         |    |Y                       |     | Gnd o----------+------+---------+----+------------------------+-----+
Q1 is for soft start. It's output should ramp up based on the time constant R1*C1,
Q2 is the feedback transistor and compares the reference voltage on VR1 with the voltage developed across R3+R6 by the monitor photodiode current.
Q3 is the LD driver.
Note the heavy capacitive filtering in this circuit. Changes would be needed to enable this circuit to be modulated at any reasonable rate.
Notes:
Capacitor C3 was marked n47 and very small, probably .47nF (470pF). Capacitor C4 was marked 10n and very small, probably 10nF (.01uF). Inductor marked Red-Black-Black-Silver, probably 20uH. Potentiometer R6 setting not measured. LM431 shunt regulator set up as 2.5V reference. A 2.5V zener or even a visible LED could also be used. Transistor types do not appear to be critical. This design is virtually identical to the circuitry found in typical laser pointers like the Laser Diode Driver from Radio Shack 63-1040 Laser Pointer reverse engineered by Walter Gray.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 3 (RE-LD3) This one runs off of a (wall adapter) power supply providing about 8 to 15 V. It was apparently designed by someone who was totally obsessed with protecting the laser diode from all outside influences - as one should be but there are limits. :-) This one goes to extremes as there are 5 levels of protection:
Input C-L-C filter. Soft start circuit (slow voltage ramp up). 7805 fixed voltage regulator. LT1054 DC-DC voltage converter. Optical power based current source. The first part of the circuit consists of the input filter, soft start circuit, voltage regulator, and DC-DC voltage converter. Its output should be s super clean, filtered, despiked, regulated, smoothed, massaged, source of -5 V ;-).
           L1               MPSA13           ::::     D1     C       E   I   +------+ O                   -5V out +12 o--+--^^^^--+--|>|--+--. Q1  .---+----| 7805 |---+------+               o        |        |1N4002 |  _\___/_   |    +-------   |      |            C5 |        |        |    R4 /     |      |      C|       |      |        +------+        |        |   10K \     |      |       |       |     8| 7  6  5|  180 |        |        |       /     |      |       |       |    +-+--+--+--+-+ uF |      +_|_ C10 +_|_ C11  |     |    +_|_ C8   |   C7 _|_   |            |16V |       --- 2.2  --- 2.2  +-----+     --- .22  |   .1 ---   |   LT1054   |  +_|_      - |  uF  - |  uF   |     |    - |  uF   |   uF  |    |            |   ---        |        |     +_|_   _|_     |       |       |    +-+--+--+--+-+  - |        |        |   C9 ---   --- C6  |       |       |     1  2| 3| 4|  C3  |        |   L2   | 4.7 - |     | .047 |       +-------+------------+--|--||--+        |  ::::  |  uF   |     |  uF  |       |              C4 |+  - |.01uF | Gnd o--+--^^^^--+-------------+------+-------+       180uF,16V +-|(--+------+
It was not possible to determine the values of L1 and L2 other than to measure their DC resistance - 4.3 ohms. The LT1054 (Linear Technology) is a 'Switched Capacitor Voltage Converter with Regulator' running at a 25 kHz switching frequency. A full datasheet is available at the Web site, above. The output of Q1 ramps up with a time constant of about 50 ms (R4 charging C9). This is then regulated by the 7805.
The LT1054 takes the regulated 5 V input and creates a regulated -5 V output. There is no obvious reason for using this part except the desire to isolate the laser diode as completely as possible from outside influences. Like the use of an Uninterruptible Power Source (UPS) to protect computer equipment from power surges, a DC-DC converter will similarly isolate the laser diode circuit from any noise or spikes on its input.
The second part of the circuit is virtually identical to that described in the section: Laser Diode Power Supply 1 (RE-LD1):
 Gnd o----------------+------------+------------------+-------+-----+                       |            |                  |       |     |                       |            |     Pwr Adj     _|_    __|__  _|_                       |            /      R2 20K  PD /_\ LD _\_/_  --- C2                       |         R1 \     +----+       |       |     |                       |        470 /     |    |       |       |     |                       |            \     +---/\/\--+--+       +-----+                       |            |     |         |                |                     +_|_           |     |       __|__              /                  C1  ---           |     |     E /   \ C            \ Rx                10uF - |            +-----|------' Q1  '-------+     /                       |            |R    |       PN2907       |    C|                       |            |     \       (PNP)        |   |/ Q2                       |           _|_.   / R3                 +---|  PN2222                       |      VR1 '/_\    \ 1K                 |   |\ (NPN)                       |      LM385 |     /               C1 +_|_   E|                       |      Z2.5  |     |             10uF  ---    |                       |            |     |X             16V - |     |                       |            |     |Y                   |     |  -5 V o---------------+------------+-----+--------------------+-----+
Note the heavy capacitive filtering in this circuit. Changes would be needed to enable this circuit to be modulated at any reasonable rate. I suspect that there are additional components inside the laser diode assembly itself (like the hypothetical Rx, probably a few ohms) but could not identify anything since it is totally potted.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Power Supply 4 (RE-LD4) This more sophisticated (or at least more complicated) driver board uses a dual op-amp (LM358) chip instead of discrete parts to control a transistor current source. Due to the relative complexity of this design, and the fact that it is entirely constructed of itty-bitty surface mount parts, errors or omissions with respect to both transcription and interpretation are quite possible! Get the schematic for LDDRIVE in PDF format: LDDRIVE-SCH. The feedback loop consists of the photodiode (PD, part of D1), a non-inverting buffer (U2A), the inverting amp/low pass filter (U2B, R9, R11, C2, bandwidth of about 1 kHz), and emitter following current source (Q1, R13, R14, with a sensitivity of 36 mA/V) driving the laser diode (LD, part of D1).
Separate DC inputs are shown for the laser diode/photodiode itself (Vcc1) and the other circuitry (Vcc2). Vcc1 must be a regulated supply as there is no on-board voltage reference. It appears as though Vcc1 and Vcc2 should be set equal to one-another though there may have been (external) power sequencing in the original application. If Vcc1 is less than Vcc2 by more than a volt or so, the laser diode will be turned off. The input voltage range can be from 5 to 12 VDC though I would recommend running on 5 VDC if possible since this will minimize power consumption and heat dissipation in the current driver transistor and other circuitry. This is adequate for laser diodes with an operating current of up to about 80 mA. For laser diodes with an operating current greater than this, a slightly higher voltage will be required.
The set-point is at about 1/2 Vcc1 so that the laser diode optical output will be controlled to maintain photodiode current at: I(PD) = .5 Vcc1 / (R6||R7). Use this to determine the setting for R7 (SBT, Select By Test, Power Adjust) for the photodiode in your particular laser diode. Or replace R7 by a low noise variable resistor and use a laser power meter to set the operating current. (Hint: Start with the minimum current - maximum resistance).
Optical output will be linear with respect to Vcc1 and inversely proportional to R6||R7 as long as the laser diode is capable of producing the output power (and thus photodiode current) determined by the equation, above. Beyond the upper limit, the laser diode will likely be damaged instantly! Don't push your luck too far. :-)
For example, with Vcc1 = Vcc2 = 5 VDC, maximum laser diode current will be limited to about 90 mA. With R7 (SBT) equal to 5.9K, photodiode current will be .5 mA. For some laser diodes, this is approximately the value for 1 mW of optical beam power BUT YOURS MAY BE TOTALLY DIFFERENT!
If you then increase Vcc1 = Vcc2 to 10 V or halve the parallel combination of R6||R7, the output power will double or the laser diode will die in a futile attempt to achieve the impossible.
A cutoff circuit is provided to disable current to the laser diode as long as Vcc2 is more than about 1 V greater than Vcc1 or from an external input logic signal (ground J1-2 to disable). This consists of Q2, Q3, and their associated resistors. When Q2 is biased on, it turns on Q3 which shorts out the input to the main current driver, Q1.
The comparator (U1, LM311) would appear to output a signal based on photodiode current being above a threshold but its true purpose and function is not at all clear (or there is a mistake in the schematic).
As noted above, there is NO on-board voltage or current reference. Thus, Vcc1 must be a well regulated DC supply with low ripple and noise and NO power-on overshoot (especially if the laser diode is being run close to its optical power limit). However, this isn't quite as critical as driving the laser diode directly since optical output power (photodiode current) and not laser diode current is the controlled parameter. A power supply using an LM317 or 7805 type IC regulator with a large high quality filter capacitor on its output (e.g., 100uF, 16V, tantalum, in parallel with a .01uF ceramic) should be adequate.
Although the original version of this board uses surface mount devices, common through-hole equivalents are available for all parts and these are labeled on the schematic. Note: A heat sink is essential for (Q1) where Vcc1 is greater than 5 VDC - this part gets warm.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Sam's Laser Diode Driver (SG-LD1) SG-LD1 is an enhanced version of the design described in the section: Laser Diode Power Supply 2 (RE-LD2) with the addition of bilevel (digital) modulation as described in the section: "Laser diode modulation". It should be capable of driving most typical small laser diodes including those found in CD players and CDROM and other optical drives, and visible laser diodes similar to those found in laser pointers, bar code scanners, medical positioning laser lights, and other similar devices. This design assumes a laser diode assembly where the laser diode anode and photodiode cathode are common (this seems to be the arrangement used most). If the opposite is true with your device (laser diode cathode and photodiode anode are common), reversing the direction of polarized components and power supply input, and changing NPN transistors to PNPs and vice-versa will permit the same PCB layout to be used. However, if your laser diode assembly has both anodes or cathodes in common, this circuit is not suitable unless an external photodiode is used for the optical feedback.
Disclaimer: The cicuit is currently under development so there may still be errors in the schematic and/or PCB artwork. I will not be responsible for any damage to your pocketbook or ego if for some reason your laser diodes do not survive. (This disclaimer may never go away!)
Get the schematic for SG-LD1 in PDF format: SG-LD1-SCH. In some cases, the part values listed should be considered as suggestions as many modifications are possible depending on your particular laser diode specifications and application needs. Transistors with heat sinks for Q2 and Q4 are advised if operating continuously near the upper end of the input voltage range (say above 10 V) and/or at laser diode currents of 100 mA or higher.
Input power (Vcc) can be anything in the range of about 10 to 15 VDC. It's not critical and will have no effect on the output power. A regulated supply isn't required.
Ebl should normally be left open. A switch closure (or open collector NPN transistor or open drain MOSFET) to Gnd shuts off the driver. Do NOT apply any active high signal to this input.
The monitor photodiode current at rated power will be in the specifications for the laser diode, usually with a rather wide range of sensitivity (10:1 or more). To start out, assume it's the minimum value and then if that doesn't result in enough output power (or any lasing at all with proper circuit operation confirmed), reduce the resistor values to obtain the desired output power. The reference point is a voltage of about 3.2 V on the base of Q1. For example, if the monitor photodiode current at full power is 0.5 mA, the total resistance would need to be about 6.4K ohms minimum. However, since the monitor photodiode sensitivity can vary widely, start with a high enough total resistance so that even worst case, the laser diode will be safe. Then, reduce the resistance once the behavior has been determined.
A positive voltage (3 to 15 V) applied to Mod turns on Q3 which shorts out R7 and increases the output power by an amount determined by the values of R4, R7, and the setting of R5. The specific resistance values must be selected based on the desired output power, modulation index, and monitor photodiode sensitivity.
CAUTION: As with all low power laser diodes, it is essential to use a laser power meter to determine the setting for maximum power.
A printed circuit board layout is also available. The entire single sided circuit board is 1.7" x 1.15" and includes modulation and enable inputs. It will run on an unregulated power supply of around 6 to 12 VDC.
The layout may be viewed as a GIF file (draft quality) as: sgld1pcb.gif.
A complete PCB artwork package for SG-LD1 may be downloaded in standard (full resolution 1:1) Gerber PCB format (zipped) as: sgld1grb.zip.
The Gerber files include the solder side copper, soldermask, top silkscreen, optional component side pads, and drill control artwork. The original printed circuit board CAD files and netlist (in Tango PCB format) are provided so that the circuit layout can be modified or imported to another system if desired. The text file 'sgld1.doc' (in sgld1grb.zip) describes the file contents in more detail.
I have a few bare (unpopulated) PCBs fabbed from this artwork available, as yet untested.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Modification of SG-LD1 for Common Cathode LD/PD (SG-LD2) While most laser diode packages have the configuration assumed by all the previous driver circuits, there are some that don't fit the mold. This section deals with one variation in particular - those with a common cathode connection. A simple modification to the basic SG-LD1 circuit (or any of the others that are similar) should permit these types of laser diodes to be safety driven.
Sam's Laser Diode Driver 2 shows the new circuit. The only changes are to the wiring of the laser diode package and the substitution of a zener diode (CR3) for R8. CR3 guarantees that the laser diode will not be driven should the voltage on the photodiode be insufficient for the feedback control to be active. At normal supply voltages, leaving R8 in as in SG-LD1 should work. The concern is that during power cycling or if run from a power supply voltage that is too low, the circuit could attempt to overdrive the laser diode thinking there is inadequate output power due to lack of bias on the photodiode and/or not enough voltage on the feedback components.
Sorry, no PCB layout available for this one. Modifications to the SG-LD1 PCB layout are left as an exercise for the student. :)
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. K3PGP's Laser Diode Driver (K3-LD1) This one runs open loop (no optical feedback) but has been designed to permit safe modulation. It should be fine as long as you don't try to run too close to the laser diode's maximum current/power rating. The circuit and an extensive description can be found at K3PGP's Experimenter's Corner under: Biasing and Modulating Laser Diodes - Safely!.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Viacheslav's Laser Diode Driver (VS-LD1) The circuit in Viacheslav's Laser Diode Driver (VS-LD1) is quite straightforward. I guess my main nit to pick would be that it uses more power than needed due to the constant current driver as opposed to a constant voltage source and a means of controlling the current via a pass transistor. But for a low power laser diode, this really isn't a major concern. There is enough filtering on the input that any transient conditions should not cause problems. (From: Viacheslav Slavinsky ([email protected]).)
I started with a constant current source using a LM317L (DA1) and R1. The current then branches to laser diode (through R5 for fine adjustment of division ratio and R6 for monitoring) to KT3 (LD anode). Another branch on VT1 is made to sink the extra current, the more the feedback, the more current sinks through the transistor. R2 regulates the reverse bias of the photodiode (it actually doesn't need to be 20K, but I picked from what I had in local store).
KT3 is the LD anode, KT4 is the PD cathode.
This circuit looks pretty stable (I can only judge by eye and voltage meter). For tests I used 2 metal-cased LED's and some unknown photodiode. Green LEDs could not impress the photodiode so I just used a laser pointer to check that feedback works. After I was sure that everything was all right, I set current to about 50 ma and plugged in the laser diode (Mitsubishi ML1016R, I = 80 mA). Then it was easy to set the nominal current and test the feedback a little against circumstances (unattaching it from heatsink for a few seconds, for example).
Actually before this circuit I assembled one similar to SG-LD1, just altered it to adopt Mitsubishi's pinout. But while testing it I felt like I'm not 100% sure how it works and I was very paranoid about LD sensitivity to everything and knew very little practical stuff, so I decided to make my own circuit. Yes, it indeed draws 120 mA where only 90 mA are used for good, there's room for improvements.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Red Laser Module 1 (RLM-LD1) This circuit was found in a 25 mW red laser diode module, model and manufacturerer unknown. It is almost an exact mirror image (with respect to polarities) of Toshiba Discrete Laser Diode Power Supply (TO-LD1). Note that the input voltage is negative.
 -Vcc o----------+------------+-----------------------+--------+------+                  |            |                       |        |      |                  |            |    Power Adjust     __|__     _|_     |                  |            |       R2 10K      PD_\_/_  LD /_\     |                  |            \     +----+            |        |      |                  |         R1 /     |    |            |        |     _|_ C2                  |        620 \     +---/\/\--+-------+        |     ---                  |            /     |         |                |      |                -_|_           |     |       __|__              |      |             C1  ---           |     |     E /   \ C            |      |           47uF + |            +-----|------' Q1  '-------+     +------+           6.3V   |            |     |        2FX         |    C|           Tant.  |            |     |       (NPN)        |   |/ Q2                  |           _|_    |                    +---|  1AM                  |       VR1 /_\    |                    |   |\ (PNP)                  |    2V LED  |     |                  -_|_   E|                  |            |     |              10uF ---    |                  |            |     |                  + |     |                  |            |     |                    |     |  Gnd o-----------+------------+-----+--------------------+-----+
Note the LED used in place of a zener. I confirmed that it actually does light up orange.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 1 (LP-LD1) (This circuit was reverse engineered by Jim Moss ([email protected]) who also provided the circuit analysis.) It is from a cheap laser pointer. Like the other discrete laser diode drivers, a single PNP transistor is used in the feedback loop to regulate laser diode current. However, although optical feedback of sorts is used, there appears to be no real reference. Thus, output power will depend on battery voltage, nominally 4.5 VDC (3 button cells, I assume) and the gain of Q2.
At first I thought some parts had been left out: At the very least, a zener or similar reference across C-E of Q2, and possibly some filter caps to keep the thing from oscillating. While was willing to believe that the design had the optical output depending on battery voltage, it seemed inconceivable for it to be directly affected by the gain of the driver transistor. However, I now believe that it is probably drawn correctly but the actual operating point is where the Q1 is almost in cutoff and its gain wouldn't be critical.
            Battery(+) o----------+----------+----------+ |Ild                                   |          |          | v                                  _|_         / R2     __|__                                  /_\ PD      \ 510    _\_/_ LD                                   |          /          |                                   | |Ipd     \ |I2      /                                   | v        | v        \ R3                                   |        |/ E         / 1.0                                   +--------| Q1 PNP     \                                   |        |\ C         |                                   / R1       |        |/ C                                   \ 120K     +--------| Q2 NPN                            S1     /         _|_       |\ E                           Power   \ |I1     /_\ D1      |                            _|_    | v        |          |            Battery(-) o----o o----+----------+----------+
For amusement, here is the analysis: Ipd = Output Power(mW) * X (where X is the sensitivity of the monitor photodiode in uA/mW). I1 is very nearly equal to lpd (minus Q1's base current). V(R1) = I1 * R1. V(R2) = V(Battery) - V(R1) - 0.7. I2 = V(R2)/R2. The operating point will depend slightly on the gain of both Q1 and Q2 but if the product ot their Hfes is high, for a given battery voltage, laser output power will be fairly constant.
You can crank the math for your favorite laser diode and transistor specs!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 2 (LP-LD2) This is the circuit from another inexpensive laser pointer. Although very similar, it includes some capacitive filtering (and more optional filtering in C2, not installed), as well as a power adjust pot (VR1). However, like the previous circuit, this does not have any absolute reference so power output will be dependent on the battery voltage to some extent. People have successfully modulated this module at a reasonable frequency (upper limit not determined) by removing or greatly reducing the value of the filter capacitor, C1. However, do this at your own risk! This unit was available from Oatley Electronics (AU) as the module LM-2 (January, 2000). Of course, they may have already switched to a different supplier or the manufacturer may have changed the design!
     Battery(+) o---------------+---------+------------+-------+                                 |         |            |       |                                _|_        / R2       __|__    _|_ C2                                /_\ PD     \ 510      _\_/_ LD --- (Opt)                                 |         /            |       |                                 | |Ipd    \ |I2   Ild| |       |                                 | v       | v        v +-------+                                 |         |            |                                 /       |/ E           |                             VR1 \<------| Q2 PNP       |                              5K /       |\ C           |                                 \         |          |/ C                                 |         +-----+----| Q1 NPN                                 |         |     |    |\ E                                 /         |     / R1   |                                 \ R3     _|_ C1 \ 10K  |                     S1          / 1K     ---    /      |                    Power        \         |     \ |I1  |                     _|_         |         |     | v    |     Battery(-) o----o o---------+---------+-----+------+
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 3 (LP-LD3) This one is even simpler than the two preceeding:
             Battery(+) o----------------------+--------+                                                |        |                                               _|_     __|__                                            PD /_\     _\_/_ LD                                                |        |                                           Ipd| |   Ild| |                                              v |      v |                                                |        |                                           R1   |      |/ E                                       +--/\/\--+------| Q1 PNP                                       |   1K          |\ C                                       /                 |                                   VR1 \<-+              |                             S1    10K /  |              |                            Power      \  |              |                             _|_       |  |              |             Battery(-) o----o o-------+--+--------------+
In this case, the power output is determined by the equation:             Vbatt - (Ipd  * (R1 + VR1)) = Vld + Vbe1 Or:                           Vbatt - Vld - Vbe1                    Ipd = --------------------                                R1 + VR1 Where: Vbatt = battery voltage under load. Ipd = total photodiode current. Vld = voltage across the laser diode. Vbe1 = Base-emitter drop (.7 V) of Q1. Since Ipd is proportional to optical power output, like LP-LD1 and LP-LD2 (above), brightness is dependent on battery voltage. In this case, it is a much more non-linear relationship as Vld and Vbe1 set a threshold of about 2 to 2.5 V below which there will be nothing and then output will increase based on Vbatt/(R1 + VR1). The circuit operates on 3 V but 4.5 V seems like the minimum to get any decent output.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 4 (LP-LD4) This one is very similar to LP-LD2, above. You can determine the math. :)
     Battery(+) o----------+--------+---------+----------+                            |        |         |          |                            |       _|_        /        __|__                            |       /_\ PD     \ R1     _\_/_                            |        |         / 1.2K     |                            |        +---+     \          |                            |        |   |     |          |                            |        \   |   |/ E         |                          +_|_    R2 /   +---| Q1 PNP     |                        C1 ---  1.2K \       |\ C         |                          - |        /         |        |/ C                            |        |         +--------| Q2 NPN                            |        /                  |\ E                            |     R3 \<--+                |                     S1     |     5K /   |                |                    Power   |        \   |                |                     _|_    |        |   |                |     Battery(-) o----o o----+--------+---+----------------+
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Cheap Red Laser Pointer 5 (LP-LD5) This is the circuit from another inexpensive laser pointer. Well, actually it's from a diode laser module, but this was obviously just a pointer driver without the pushbutton (which I have added in the schematic). Battery voltage is 2.6 to 3.0 V. It's very similar to LP-LP1 and LP-LD2, above.
     Battery(+) o---------------+---------+------------+                                 |         |            |                                 |         / R2       __|__                                _|_        \ 2.7K     _\_/_ LD                                /_\ PD     /            |                                 |         \            |                                 |         |            |                                 |       |/ E           |                                 +-------| Q2 PNP       |                                 |       |\ C           |                                 |         |          |/ C                                 |         +------+---| Q1 NPN                                 /         |      |   |\ E                                 \ R3      |      /     |                                 / 3.6K   _|_     \ R1  |                     S1          \        --- C1  / 10K |                    Power        |         |      \     |                     _|_         |         |      |     |     Battery(-) o----o o---------+---------+------+-----+
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from IR Laser Module 1 (ILM-LD1) This is a very simple circuit from a 780 nm laser diode module sent to me by Shawo Hwa Industrial Co., Ltd., a Taiwanese manufacturer of laser pointers, laser modules, and other related laser devices. This unit is similar to the guts from a typical visible laser pointer. Connections are via wires though there is a battery contact spring hidden under heatshrink, but no switch or power adjust pot. The laser diode is in a 5.6 mm metal can though the window appears to be molded in place rather than glued from the inside.
             Battery(+) o----+--------+--------+--------+                              |        |        |        |                              |       _|_       /      __|__                              |    PD /_\    R2 \      _\_/_ LD                              |        |    10K /        |                              |        |        \        |                              |        |        |      |/ C                              |        |        +------| Q2 NPN                          C1 _|_       |        |      |\ E                       7.5uF ---       |      |/ C       |                              |        +------| Q1 NPN   |                              |        |      |\ E       /                              |        /        |     R3 \                              |     R1 \        |     10 /                              |   3.9K /        |        \                              |        \        |        |                              |        |        |        |             Battery(-) o-----+--------+--------+--------+
The battery voltage is spec'd at 3 V. The only reference device is the B-E junction of Q1 so power output will vary with temperature and not very much with battery voltage. Both SMT transistors were labeled "RIP". R1 could be changed to a pot to provide a variable power adjustment. I assume that for this module, its value is selected for each laser diode. I'm not sure what the rated output power is for this module other than "<5mW" but it actually measured 2.3 mW.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 1 (GLP-LD1) Here is the schematic for the driver from a CW green DPSS laser pointer generously contributed to the cause by Laserpointers.co.uk. There is no model number on the case but it is manufactured by Lightvision Technologies Corp., Taiwan. The pointer was given to me because (1) it was broken and (2) Laserpointers.co.uk apparently doesn't deal with this supplier anymore so they couldn't send it back for repair. The pointer is in a nice dark blue case with gold and chrome trim. It was quite dead. However, fiddling with the batteries while completing the contact from the positive terminal to the case resulted in some flashes of green light and with just the right pressure, a continuous beam. So, there had to be a bad connection inside. Clamping the chrome cap on the output-end in a vice with some protective padding and wiggling resulted in it coming loose relatively easily. The result is shown in Components of Typical Green DPSS Laser Pointer. It turns out that the laser module consists of several parts. Sorry, no complete dissection. :) These are screwed together with dabs of glue to keep them from shifting position. However, the positive return for the battery also goes though these joints (from rear cap though case to front cap, IR filter holder, collimating lens holder, DPSS module, laser diode case and finally back to the driver board). And one of the joints wasn't exactly tight. Perhaps, the path is really supposed to be via contact between the case and the DPSS module directly but the lumps of glue prevented this. So, I wrapped some bare wire around all the parts and then covered this with aluminum foil and tape. ;-)
The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 1 is a basic dual op-amp constant current driver. All part values were either labeled or measured except for C4 since I didn't risk putting a capacitance meter across the laser diode. But C4 looks identical to the others so there is high degree of confidence in the uF value. D1 and C1 provide soft-start and the pointer doesn't seem to mind reverse polarity (either by design or because Murphy took a day off). All in all, not a bad little circuit. No, I don't intend to turn the pot. ;-)
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 2 (GLP-LD2) Here is the schematic for the driver from the green DPSS laser pointer described in the section: The Edmund Scientific Model L54-101 Green Laser Pointer. Photos of the pointer are shown in Components of Edmund Scientific L54-101 Green DPSS Laser Pointer. This is a pulsed model operating at about 4.5 kHz with a 50% duty cycle. The driver board was designed by B&W Tek who are also the supplier of the pointer to Edmund Scientific. The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 2 uses what appears to be a low voltage 33202 dual op-amp. Do a Google search for "MC33202".) It's configured as a squarewave oscillator feeding a constant current driver. Part values for the capacitors were all guessed because they wouldn't produce meaningful readings on either of my DMMs. This is still a mystery.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 3 (GLP-LD3) This driver is from a pointer that is externally identical to the one described in the section: Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 1 (GLP-LD1) but the actual DPSS module and driver differ. The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 3 is a basic current regulated driver using a single op-amp with a range of approximately 0.167 to .333 A. It was set to about 0.300 A.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Laser Diode Driver from Green Laser Pointer 4 (GLP-LD4) Here is the schematic for the driver from a Z-Bolt BTMK-10 green DPSS laser pointer. This one is rated at 5 mW, though I assume the same design is used for some higher power versions. The ZBolt BTMK-10 is actually not a pointer in the usual sense since it doesn't have a momentary switch on the side and is aimed at (no pun...) targeting applications. But I'll call it a pointer here. :) The switch is on the rear end and is latching. This one differs from the 3 previous drivers in that it uses Automatic Power Control (APC) rather than Automatic Current Control (ACC, constant current). So, the feedback loop is closed by a photodiode that samples a portion of the output beam. The circuit in Green Laser Pointer Diode Driver 4 uses what appears to be a low voltage ELM8548M1 dual op-amp. However, as can be seen in the schematic, there is no feedback resistor for the second op-amp so perhaps that has one built-in. The parts were all labeled, though I'm not positive about which labels went with which parts in a couple cases. There is also space for a tiny surface mount LED and its current limiting resistor.
While the APC circuit operation is quite straightforward, there would seem to be a potential issue should the circuit be incapable of obtaining the expected output power. Since there is no absolute current limit, it could drive the laser diode to destruction should someone power it in a cold environment where the diode wavelength doesn't match up with the vanadate absorption and it can't produce 5 mW at rated diode current. The current would then be limited only by circuit and battery resistance. However, if the designers were really clever, they might have set up the beam sampler to just enough pump light leaks through to the photodiode and limit the current even with insufficient green output. However, I rather doubt this to be the case since there is no way to adjust any current limit.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Simple Laser Diode Power Supply The first one is for low power laser diodes: (From: Brian Mork ([email protected]).)
Best circuit I've found:
            In +-------+ Out     R1  (+) o-----+---| LM317 |--------/\/\-----+-----+------o LD anode            |   +-------+      18 ohms*   |     |        C1 _|_ +    | Adjust              |    _|_ C2    __|__      22uF ---      +---------------------+    --- 1uF   _\_/_            |  =                                |          |            |                                   |  (-) o-----+-----------------------------------+------o LD cathode
Note: Resistor value depends on your specific laser diode current requirements. Discussion below assumes a laser diode with a 72 to 100 mA drive range. Power is 5.5 to 9 VDC. I use a 9 volt battery.
Watch the pin arrangement on the LM317. On the LM317L (the TO-92 plastic transistor type case) and the LM317T (TO-220 7805-type case), the pins are, left to right, Adjust-Output-Input.
For the resistor, I use a small carbon 10 ohm in series with a precision 10-turn 20 ohm adjustable. The combo was empirically set to about 17 ohms.
On initial power on, use three garden variety diodes stacked in series instead of the laser diode. Put a current meter in series with the diode stack and adjust the precision resistor for 50-60 mA. Disconnect power and replace the diode stack with the laser diode. Connect up power again, still watching on the current meter. The diode will probably initially glow dimly. I use a diode that lases at about 72 mA, and has a max rating of 100 mA. I use about 85 mA for normal ops.
Turn up the current, never exceeding your diode's max limit. The dim glow will increase in intensity, but at some point, a distinctive step in intensity will occur. Your diode is lasing. Remove the current meter as desired. Enjoy!
(From: Crow (alias Lostgallifreyan).)
In all the variations of laser diode drivers based on three terminal regulators like the LM317, there is the detail of selecting the series resistor. Standard resistor values rarely match exactly. However, two standard resistors can likely get you to within 1 mA of desired current on a range up to 5 amps, in a parallel or series network. But which two will get closest while remaining under the limit? And how large must they be to handle the current they'll take? LM317 and LM338 Current Regulator Resistor Calculator is a C program to find the best pairing of available resistors for the selected current at maximum power dissipation. The reasoning behind this is that while many of those drivers will preset or even modulate a current, many people will want to do it within a strict, hardwired upper limit, and sometimes 1.25/I just isn't enough information. The code is free to all, and will likely compile on anything that runs C code in a text-based shell or console window.
Even though the standard resistor ranges like E24 or E12 only cover every possible value at low tolerances, metal film resistors are usually sold as 1% regardless of how small the range is from a supplier. This means the coverage is like a net instead of a cloth. Two resistors are chosen by the program on the assumption of infinitely strict tolerance, but this will still deliver pairings whose current limit is very close to the desired current in almost all cases. Of course, the best thing to do is use 1% resistors. If there is a significant error in some rare case, the comparison of wanted and actual currents will show it. In this case, try some current to see if there is a better match to that. There usually won't be because the program tries all possibilities and gives you its best shot anyway. So use the most recise resistors you can get and bear in mind that for very low currents the regulator, rather than the resistors, will determine how accurate the result will be.
(From: Steve Roberts.)
Here's a similar circuit that will drive pump diodes for solid state lasers with up to about 0.8 A if a most excellent heatsink is used:
            In +-------+ Out   R1 1 ohm,2 W  (+) o-----+---| LM317 |--------/\/\-----+-----+------o LD anode            |   +-------+                 |     |        C1  |       | Adjust    R2 1K     |     |      22uF _|_+     +------------/\/\-----+   +_|_ C2    __|__     Tant- ---      |    R3     R4 500         --- 1uF   _\_/_       alum | -     +---/\/\----/\/\----+     - |          |            |           560      ^      |       |            |                    |      |       |            (-) o-----+--------------------+------+-------+------o LD cathode
Note: It is important to use a tantalum capacitor for C1. Input power should be regulated 5 to 6 VDC. Since there is some interaction between diode voltage and current with this design, make sure to set up the current adjustment with a dummy (e.g., dead) laser diode, or make sure it is set low before applying power and increase it slowly to the operating point. Then, fine tweak the current once the temperature of the diode has stabilized.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. EU38 Low Cost Constant Current Laser Diode Driver This is a small printed circuit board (about 14x35 mm) which will drive laser diodes in constant current mode up to 800 mA without a heat sink and about 1.2 A with a heatsink (not included). It is suitable for driving laser diodes not requiring optical feedback such as DPSS laser pump diodes of up to about 0.5 W output. The EU38 is available from Roithner Lasertechnik and formerly from B&W Tek. Thus, it is likely manufactured by someone else. Description and specs can be found on Roithner's Laser Diode Drivers Page.
The schematic I reverse engineered from the Roithner version can be found in EU38 Constant Current Laser Diode Driver. The circuit consists of an NPN power transistor controlled by a single op-amp. Feedback is taken from a 0.6 ohm series current sense resistor. One issue that I've found is that the reference is a zener diode (type unidentified) which probably doesn't have enough current going through it so while the feedback loop has enough gain and current regulation is quite good with respect to laser diode characteristics, the reference voltage changes slightly with input voltage. Thus, I recommend powering the unit from a regulated supply rather than a cheap wall adapter or batteries.
Not all components were labeled so it's quite possible there are errors. The zener voltage was determined by measurement with an input voltage to the board of about 4 VDC. I'm kind of guessing about the resistance of the Iadj pot (R4). It's more than 20K and less than 100K, so 50K is a nice standard intermediate value. The bias current or offset voltage or something :) of the mediocre op-amp (an LM358 clone) adds about 0.05 A to the output current.
I did find and fix two errors that were in my original schematic: (1) the value of R6 had been shown as 4.7K rather than 47K and (2) when I measured the voltage across the zener (ZD1), it was 1.05 V rather than the 1.5 V I had before. Although I was rather suspicious of that 1.05 V, a similar voltage has been confirmed by someone else. Perhaps the 1.5 V was wishful thinking when I originally traced the schematic.
The Roithner specs for the EU38 say that it can go to 1.2 A with a heatsink. As drawn, the maximum current is just about 1 A so there may still be errors in the schematic. If the resistance of the pot were much higher, the maximum current might almost get to 1.2 A. Or a user modification may be needed to go any higher. There are 6 through-pads on the PCB that I thought might have been intended for this purpose, but 4 are connected to ground, 1 is connected to power, and 1 is a no-connect.
I have used the EU38 to power the green demo laser described in the section: Even Simpler Instant Green DPSS Laser. The complete power supply is shown in Green Demo Laser Power Supply Using EU38. One complaint about the EU38 is that a jeweler's screwdriver must be used to adjust the current and the slot is in the metal wiper of the pot so it picks up 60 (or 50) Hz noise and modulates the diode current while touching it if the screwdriver handle isn't insulated!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Super Simple Laser Diode and TEC Driver Super Simple Laser Diode and TEC Driver uses a hand-full of Radio Shack parts to provide variable current to a low power laser diode along with a TEC for cooling. OK, they will have to be Digikey parts since RS doesn't really sell parts anymore. :) The laser diode driver is an adjustable voltage regulator with a current limiting resistor. Added filtering and reverse polarity protection guarantee no overshoot or transients when power cycling. The cooling-only TEC driver is a MOSFET with a pot for the set-point. With only a MOSFET as the active component, this won't be very precise for temperature tuning but is adequate to keep the diode cool. I built it to power a Crystalaser 35 mW red diode laser. The numbers by LD1, TH1, and TEC1 refer to the 10 pin ribbon cable connector on the laser head. LED2 provides a rough indication of the voltage across the TEC, and thus the current through it.
Note that the voltage for the TEC is the same as the voltage for the laser diode based on the argument that there will be correlation between the LD power and the required TEC power. It could also come from the fixed 12 VDC input.
For this low power Crystalaser laser, the TEC is almost unnecessary as the maximum current to the laser diode is under 100 mA. But it was an excuse to implement this trivial scheme. In fact, acceptable cooling could be achieved even without using any active components by simply putting the laser diode in series with the TEC. But with the MOSFET, it was somewhat better.
A regulated 12 VDC power supply is recommended. Using a 7812 to provide this from a 15 to 20 VDC source would be ideal.
There's nothing critical in the circuit. Any sort of common adjustable regulator can be used. The LT1084 was simply available, but an LM317 would be fine as well. Same for the MOSFET. The BUZ71A just happened to cry out to be used. :)
CAUTION: This is a more or less constant current driver without optical feedback. Therefore, it may not be suitable for laser diodes where the operating range of current is small.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Constant Current Supply for High Power Laser Diodes (From: Winfield Hill ([email protected]).) The schematic in the section: Simple Laser Diode Power Supply is the standard circuit for making a constant current source from an LM317 or LM338 (e.g. see The Art of Electronics, fig 6.38). The problem with this circuit is that for large currents (the only currents for which it has good accuracy, and is a serious part saver) it's hard to make the current variable.
For example, for a 3.5 A current source, the resistor value is 0.357 ohms, and if you then want a 3.1 A current you've got to unsolder it and replace it with a 0.403 ohm resistor. Bummer.
One option would be to put a low value pot across the sense resistor and connect its tap to the voltage regulator common/adjust terminal. This will work reasonably well for a modest current range - perhaps up to 2:1 as shown below - but runs into difficulties where a wide range of control is desired.
       In +-------+ Out        R1 1.01 ohm  Vin o----| LM317 |---+-----------/\/\----+----o 1.25 to 2.5 A current source           +-------+   |                   |               | Adj.  +---/\/\-----/\/\---+               |            R2        ^ R3               |         100 ohms     | 100 ohms               +----------------------+
The reason is that this arrangement can only *increase* the current from the nominal I = 1.25V/R. So, for example, to get a 10:1 range, the voltage across the sense resistor would be 12.5 V for the 10x current! In general this is not attractive for the high current condition because not only have you required a higher supply voltage, at the maximum current, but the power dissipation in the sense resistor is also quite high (more like HUGE --- sam).
Let me offer the following simple circuit, which I just created and haven't tried but 'oughta work' as a solution to this problem.
By contrast, this circuit can only *decrease* the current from the 1.25V/R value, but it easily handles a 10:1 range (or even much more) and the voltage across the sense resistor is never more than 1.25V, allowing low supply voltage (e.g. 5 V) and keeping the dissipation low.
       In +-------+ Out  R1 .25 ohms  Vin o----| LM338 |-------/\/\/----+-----o 0 to 5 A current source           +-------+                |               | Adj.          +----+               |            cw |    |               |          1K ^ /   _|_,               +-------------->\  '/_\  LM385-1.2                               /    |                               |    |                               +----+                                    |                        +------------------------+                        | I = 0.5 to 1.5 mA sink |                        +------------------------+                                   _|_                                    -
The 1K pot selects a portion of the floating 1.23 V reference voltage, and tricks the LM317 or LM338 into correspondingly reducing the voltage across the 0.25 ohm current-sense resistor. The pot is conventional and may be panel mounted. It should be possible to nearly shut off the LM338 (a minimum quiescent current will still flow). The current sink, I, which powers the floating 1.23 V reference, is not critical and may be a simple current mirror (sorry to see the TL011 gone!), or even a resistor to ground or any available negative voltage, depending upon the desired current-source voltage-compliance range. That's it!
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver 1 (SG-DH1) This isn't exactly an entire design but one that uses a common logic power supply in an unconventional way. It may be possible to use a high current switchmode power supply as a variable current laser diode driver as long as it has remote sensing capability. The remote sensing feedback loop maintains a constant voltage (the spec'd supply voltage) between RS+ and RS-. Normally, this is used to compensate for the voltage drop in the wiring harness. By applying a variable control voltage between RS+ and V+, the power supply can be fooled into producing any output voltage from near 0 to its maximum rating as long as its minimum load requirement is satisfied. With a small resistor in series with the laser diode (or for those willing to take risks, the resistance of the laser diode), this results in a variable current to the laser diode. The only limit on output current is the maximum rating of the power supply. These types of power supplies, capable of 50 A, 100 A, or even higher current, are readily available on the surplus market. However, this scheme may only work with certain models, those which power their control circuitry separately from the main output and don't go into some sort of undervoltage shutdown if the output voltage goes too low. I don't know how to determine which models satisfy this requirement.
Vicor has application notes on doing this (among other things) with some of their Flatpac (among other) models. Search for "Programmable Current Source" or go to . The power supplies shown have an additional input called "Trim" which makes the modification particularly easy. I have an archived copy of the most relevant information at Vicor - Flatpac Applications Circuits.
I have not yet attempted to close the loop and provide actual current control but have opted for voltage control for now at least. The unit I've been using for these tests is a Shindengen PS5V100A, a fully enclosed fan cooled switchmode power supply that's about 15 years old. This unit is also nice in that it regulates well with no load. All that was needed was to remove the shorting link between V+ and RS+ and install a 20 ohm, 2 W resistor in its place. Then applying 0 to +15 VDC current limited by a 47 ohm, 5 W resistor across RS+ (+) and V+ (-), the output voltage would vary from near 0 to 5 VDC.
      RS- <------ Remote Sense -------> RS+        o                                 o        |     V-  Vout   V+               |        |     o          o                |        |     |    R0    |          R1    |    R2        |     |   250    |        20 2W   |  47 5W         Vcontrol        +-----+---/\/\---+-----+---/\/\---+---/\/\---o + 0 to 15 VDC - o---+        |                      |                                           |        +---|<|---+---/\/\---+-+-------------------------------------------+            LD1   |    R3    |           Laser  | .05 500W |    Adjusting Vcontrol from 0 to 15 V varies           Diode  o          o      Vout from 5 V to 0 V.                 VS- Vsense VS+
(R0 is internal to this particular power supply.)
R3 can be constructed from a length of building wire. For example, 20 feet of #14 copper wire has a resistance of 0.05 ohms but water cooling would be needed if run near full current. I'm actually only using a head lamp load for testing and it works fine.
The same scheme using RS- did not have enough range, probably due to the internal circuit design. This is too bad because the op-amp circuitry to drive it might have been simpler, or at least more intuitive to design.
(I did try a test of the same approach with a Pioneer Magnetics dual output power supply (5 VDC at 59 A, 12 VDC at 67 A). While control was possible, it didn't behave nearly as perfectly as the Shindengen supply. More than 1/2 A of control current was required to change the 5 V output to 4 V. And while the 12 VDC output could be reduced to near 0 V, the cooling fans cut out at about 8 VDC so they would need to be powered separately for continuous operation at high current. But this might be nice for driving series connected laser diode bars.)
The challenge is to convert this to a user friendly form that is safe for the laser diode. I am designing a control panel which incorporates what I hope will be fail-safe circuits to minimize the chance of excessive current either from power cycling or by user error. It will use closed loop feedback so the actual current can be set (rather than voltage) and includes a multifunction panel meter (set current, actual current, diode voltage). It will enable diode current only if all power supplies are stable and correct, the 10 turn current adjust pot is at 0, and with the press of a green button.
However, initially, I'm using a 10 turn pot to control the current with a digital panel meter monitoring current via a 0.025 ohm sense resistor. Current is limited to 50 A by a 0.06 ohm power resistor. Believe it or not, even 50 A is way below the limit for the diodes I need to test! See the section: Characteristics of Some Really High Power IR Diode Lasers.
The schematic in Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver 1 includes the control panel, connections to the 100 A power supply, and laser diode wiring.
The basic control panel includes an Enable switch (eventually to be replaced with a keylock switch), Diode On and Off buttons, the 10 turn pot and DPM which reads 0 to 100 A. A differential amplifier converts the voltage across the current sense resistor into a DC voltage for the DPM. Without the differential amplifier, the control current was seriously affecting the readings as 1 A is only 2.5 mV. It's not possible (or at least not convenient) to separate the power and signal wiring to provide a proper single point ground.
Both the sense and current limiting resistors are simply lengths of #14 copper wire with forced air cooling. This works very well with the diode's output digging pits in my brick beam stop. :) However, for continuous operation, it may be necessary to replace the #14 with #8 because even the modest heating of the copper changes its resistance enough to noticeably affect current.
With minor changes in part values for the current limiting resistors, and the set-point for the power supply output voltage, it should be possible to drive a pair of laser diodes in series as long as they can be isolated from the common point. (The positive connection to a high power laser diode is usually the mounting block of the diode but it may not be connected to the external case itself.) However, one risk with this setup is that if one of the laser diodes fails shorted, it will likely take the other one as well since the current will spike to a very high level.
The setup is shown in Photo of Sam's High Power Laser Diode Driver In Action. The water-cooled laser diode in the aluminum box is capable of 35 W output at around 55 to 60 A. The power supply is at the upper left with the control panel in front of it showing 40 A. Behind the power supply is the coil of white wire acting as a current limiting resistor next to its cooling fan. The current sense resistor is the 12 inches of so of red wire running from the power supply to the terminal strip. The blue-white glow is my digital camera's response to intense IR. The camera is really confused. :) When viewed through IR blocking laser goggles, a line on the brick starts glowing at a current of around 35 A and is white-hot at 45 A, where the current limit of the power supply is presently set (via the current limiting resistor and wiring resistance with the power supply adjusted for a maximum output of 5 VDC). The old darkroom enlarger timer in the upper right is used to turn the driver on for exactly the 20 seconds needed for my "meat thermometer" type power meter to take its reading, which would show about 23 W at 40 A for the diode in the photo. The reading at 45 A is about 27 W.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Tim's High Power Laser Diode Driver (TO-LD1) (The schematic and portions of the description below are from: Tim O'Brien ([email protected]).) The circuit in Tim's High Power Laser Diode Driver is designed for high power laser diodes which include a monitor photodiode for optical feedback. Note that most common high power diodes are driven with a constant current but optical feedback enables more precise control of output power. Diodes like this are available from Roithner Lasertechnik at very reasonable prices.
The front-end is a current differential amplifier (very similar to the approach used in the LM2900 Norton op amp). I hand-picked the two transistors for the current mirror for close matching. They are mounted in a common heat sink to keep them at the same temperature.
The constant current sources are LM334s. These are cheap and work well. The one used on the non-inverting input of the current mirror is adjustable to about 2 mA. The one used as the common emitter amplifier load was set to about 1 mA.
There is a 100 uF, 16 V capacitor on board too as well as a reverse biased diode in parallel with an RC snubber directly across the laser leads (not shown).
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Joshua's High Power Laser Diode Driver (JD-LD1) This is a simple design good to at least 3 A that can easily be extended to even higher current. See Josh's Web Site. Go to "Physics", "Lasers", "Regulated Current Source for High Power Laser Diode". What's still needed is protection to guarantee that the circuit is well behaved when power cycling. This circuit will probably evolve over time.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Digitally Controlled Laser Diode Driver "Visible-Laser Driver Has Digitally Controlled Power And Modulation" was published in the "Ideas For Design" section of "Electronic Design", March 23, 1998, by Roger Kenyon of Maxim. Go to http://electronicdesign.com/"Electronic Design and search for "visible laser diode driver digital 1998" or something similar. The circuit provides 1024 discrete output levels from a laser diode (with optical feedback) using a D/A converter with a 3 wire serial input. In essence, it is a basic laser diode driver with a programmable reference.
Also see the section: Laser Diode Drive Chips.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Pulsed Laser Diode Drivers The following circuits would be suitable for driving the type of pulsed laser diodes found in the Chieftain tank rangefinder and currently available from OSRAM Opto Semiconductors and possibly other sources. These are very different than the sort of laser diodes with which we are generally familiar. A typical specification might be 8 W peak power at 850 or 900 nm (depending on model) with power requirements of 10 A at 0.1% maximum duty cycle. Thus, the average output power is actually in the mW range even though these laser diodes may be listed in some surplus suppliers' catalogs (like those of Bull Electronics) as multi-watt devices with the duty cycle restriction listed in fine print, if at all! Since the average power dissipation is also very low, they may come in plastic packages like LEDs with flat polished faces (and no possibility of adding a heatsink, which is one of the major limitations on average output power)! Other than time-of-flight laser rangefinders and related applications, I'm not sure what use these would be to a hobbyist. And, their output is totally invisible but very definitely not eye-safe. Here are a couple of options for drivers:
A simple approach that should work is to use an SCR as the switch triggered by your favorite pulse generator, 555 timer based astable, or other oscillator circuit followed by a trigger device like a neon bulb, diac, or small SCR to guarantee fast turn-on of SCR1. The circuit below is similar to the one from Scientific American (see below) which describes the use of pulsed laser diodes back in March 1973 when no other types had been invented yet (or at least none were readily available). With the component values shown, the laser diode should have a peak current of about 10 A with a 100 ns time constant. Thus, it isn't a nice rectangular pulse but that's for the advanced course. :) R1 limits charging current, R2 limits discharge current, and D1 provides reverse polarity protection for the laser diode.
                                   R1                    +200 VDC o-----/\/\------+-----+                                   50K       |     |                                             /    _|_ C1                                          R2 \    --- 5nF,250V                                          20 /    _|_                                             \     -                                           __|__ SCR1        (1 KHz max)                        _\_/_ TIC106D       +------------+     +---------+      / |   400V,4A       | Oscillator |-----| Trigger |-----'  |       +------------+     +---------+        +--------+                                           __|__     _|_                                 Pulsed LD _\_/_     /_\ D1                                             |        |  1N4007                                             +--------+                                            _|_                                             -
Scientific American had an article on driving a pulsed laser diode in "Infrared Diode Laser", March, 1973, pg. 114. This is also a part of the collection: "Light and its Uses". There is a pulse drive circuit in Skip Campisi's "Laser Clinic" article in Poptronics, June 2001. It's based on an NPN transistor operating in avalanche mode to generate the required short high current pulses. There used to be a driver circuit on the SVBx High Tech Labs Web site without attribution. (However, this Web site is now defunct. If anyone has saved this circuit, please send me mail via the Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Email Links Page.) The RCA SG2002 laser diode is probably long obsolete but the ones found in Chieftain tank rangefinder should be similar (though the specific ratings may differ somewhat). OSRAM Opto Semiconductors currently manufactures similar devices.
I couldn't find a substitute for the VM64GA but I expect that a readily available N-channel enhancement mode MOSFET like the IRF530 would work in its place. Replacements for the any of the other parts shouldn't be critical. Make sure you have the complete datasheet for your laser diode so you can modify component values intelligently! :)
The discrete totem pole buffer circuit designed to provide very fast turn-on and turn-off may be overkill depending on your requirements and it may be sufficient to just drive the power MOSFET directly from a pulse generator or other signal source.
Check out Directed Energy, Inc. for schematics, white papers, and specs using ultra fast power MOSFETS. You can also buy complete drivers for pulsed laser diodes with pulse widths down to at least 4 ns at 40 AMPs. And just to repeat, in case you have forgotten: Most common low power laser diodes can't be pulsed in this manner to achieve high power status - they instantly turn into Dark Emitting Laser Diodes (DELDs) or expensive LEDs. :)
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIP Laser Diode Driver (From: Rob Kirke ([email protected]).) I just recently reverse engineered the IR laser driver out of an HP LaserJet IIP (Part number RG1-1594). I've drawn up the full schematic for the board and have got it working outside the printer with with a simple power supply using a 7808, 7805, and a couple of capacitors. See Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIP Laser Diode Driver (RG1-1594).
The board obviously supports very fast beam modulation, and has a complete collimating assembly. The diode itself is a standard case, and easy to get to (4 screws, no glue or springs) so it could be swapped for a visible diode or replaced easily. Two feedback adjust trimmers are located on the board (one fine adjust, one coarse)
Also, I've seen these boards advertised as replacement parts on the net for $20, so they would make quite a nice unit for someone who doesn't have the time to build a driver board up.
Here is the pinout:
+5 VDC GND Photodiode output Laser drive level input Modulation (Active low) GND +8 VDC The feedback loop seems to be 1:1 so pins 3 and 4 can be shorted together (Mine runs at about 43 mA under these conditions). Pin 5 was originally driven by a single gate from a 74LS08.
Here is the parts list if you want to build your own:
R401    42.2 R402    10K R403    10K R404    47 R405    1.5K R406    1.5K R407    510 R408    3.9K R409    10K R410    1.5K R411    10 R412    510 R413    8.66K R414    1.2K R415    47 R416    27K R417    10 R418    10 R419    10
VR401   500 VR402   10K
C401    33 uF   25 V     Electrolytic C402    33 uF   25 V     Electrolytic C403    0.1 uF  25 V     Ceramic C404     C405    680 pF           Ceramic C406    0.01 uF          Ceramic C407    270 pF           Ceramic
Q401    2SA950           PNP Q402    2SC1815          NPN Q403    2SC4455          NPN Q404    2SC4455          NPN
IC401   HA17324          Hitachi Quad Op-Amp Please contact me via the email address, above, if anyone finds out what wavelength the laser is, or how many milliwatts. I'm presuming about 800 nm at about 5 mW.
(From: Sam.)
Someone suggested it was 50 mW at 930 nm but the power seems high for a printer of this era. Though, perhaps the same driver has been used in newer higher performance ones.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Hewlett Packard LaserJet IIIP Laser Diode Driver (From: Filip Ozimek.) The pinout of the LaserJet IIIP driver is the same as for the LaserJet IIP, above. I found that light emitted from the laser diode is 786.5 nm (measured with spectrometer) and average power is about 4.5 to 5 mW (measured with a laser power meter). The laser diode is enclosed in a TO-18 (5.6 mm) package with ground connected to the case.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. A 1 MHz Analog Laser Modulator Based On LM317 Regulator (From: Crow (alias Lostgallifreyan).) Start with the two pictures, it's more fun that way and this text will make more sense. They are LM317-Based Laser Diode Driver Traces and LM317-Based Laser Diode Driver Schematic and PCB Layout.
Description: This laser diode modulator exceeds the performance of many, for a few reasons. First, the LM317 regulator, though not approved by most experts for this task, is clearly aimed at excellent transient handling, and is known for this ability. If 1.5 amps is not enough, you can substitute for the LM317 with an LM338 to get up to 5 amps, and even gang several of them (as described in the data sheet, and see the detail, below), making huge output power available with a very simple circuit. Graphs in various data sheets support my assertion that it should be fine up to at least 1 MHz with arbitrary waveshapes, and there is a radio engineer called Harry Lythall who accidentally made an LM317 oscillate and subsequently transmitted successful messages at 1.8 MHz and who thinks it can be pushed to higher frequencies. (I think that with a sine wave requirement for radio broadcast, he is certainly right about this, but I have no ham license so I won't be trying to prove it).
How to use it: Set the pot to maximum, remove modulation from input. Switch on power. Adjust the pot downwards till the beam all but disappears as the diode current drops just below lasing threshold. Then apply modulation. That's it.
Details of use: Build the board as described in the second picture (some details from the main text below will be needed to do this right). LM317-Based Laser Diode Driver Artwork can be used to make the PCB. If you can't get an LT1215 op-amp use a CA3240 for now. It's slower but it works well if about 200 kHz is all you need (it will still do this better than the Die4drive or Flexmod N2 drivers). To get fast modulation, to well beyond 1 MHz, a fast slew rate is needed. Large gain bandwidth product is less important because both halves of the op-amp are running at unity gain, but stability at unity gain is important. To optimise the compromise between stability and speed, some small ultrafast ringing occurs, but nothing that harms a laser or disturbs a show. The LT1215 needs several picofarads of compensation for unity gain stability (one capacitor for each stage, a tiny surface mount device soldered to pads on the back of the board). For speeds below about 200 kHz we can get away with a CA3240 (which needs no such compensation), making this by FAR the easiest laser driver to find parts for! But we want a FAST laser driver, do we not? :)
Wire the pot so the ground is on the top end of the scale, a fully clockwise turn should ground the wiper. Use a GOOD pot, a sealed cermet or polymer track type. Even better, a potentiometer IC which offers several useful advantages for remote control as well as low noise and long life and secure retention of setting... At minimum it's all modulation, at maximum it's all fixed output current. The board has space for a single turn cermet preset pot, and four pads, so it can be mounted such that full clockwise turn can be all modulation, or full fixed output current, depending on preference.
Any input subtracts from the reference voltage, and full input almost cancels it (but not quite, it it wise to avoid ground clipping in the op-amp if possible, to prevent strange behaviour at high speeds). When this inverted modulation is passed to the second stage via the pot, it subtracts from the load's high side voltage, making the regulator reduce its current when the original input goes low. At full input or pot maximum, as either case removes input to the second stage inverting input, the second stage output equals the load's high side voltage, which in turn means the maximum current is solely determined by the regulator's fixed resistor. The input's zener diode prevents a signal capable of driving the regulator to output more current, as does clipping at ground in the first stage even if the zener failed.
The pot is also useful as a simple fader in absence of modulation, and if set to minimum position, allows remote dimming by varying an input DC voltage from 0V, to 5V for full output. Note that local dimming with the inbuilt pot overrides the modulation at maximum setting, you cannot modulate to reduce from maximum preset brightness. If you need to do this, as with some inbuilt laser modulators, you need to invert your signal before input to the driver, as is usual in any laser system that conforms to high side drive and active high input. Usually you'd only need to do this when the laser's inbuilt modulator does not conform.
The second op-amp stage takes into account whatever the laser diode voltage drop is, so any dynamic shift in that value with changes in current is automatically compensated. Dangerous input, including overvoltage, reversed polarity, even moderate static discharge, is prevented from harming the driver or laser diode by a combination of input resistor and zener diode. The zener's capacitance also forms a filter with the 100R resistor, that allows clean waveshapes at 1 MHz while slowing down any transients fast enough to cause trouble later if they got through. Don't tempt fate by being careless of static discharge, otherwise add a large 6V metal oxide varistor across the input socket if you insist on riding the lightning. C3 and C4 on the board are for power supply decoupling. Make C3, the closest one to the op-amp, a 0.1 uF low ESR ceramic, and C4 a 40 V, 22 u low ESR tantalum.
Another important aspect of the use of two op-amp stages is the repair of mark/space ratio symmetry at high speed due to differences in rise and fall time. As one stage falls when the other rises, the differences cancel to an extent great enough to allow higher performance than with a single stage. Despite two stages slowing the transitions more than one, this is still true, as scoping the output of the first stage, then the second, will demonstrate. A small asymmetry exists at 1 MHz anyway, but far less than appears on the first stage.
NOTE: An SPDT switch could select either the input on the first stage, or the output from it, to feed to the pot. This could allow a simple way to get compatibility for systems with inverted signaling, but the price will be a loss of symmetry correction for high speeds because in this case the first op-amp stage is not used.
As you can gang output resistors and diodes to one regulator, and multiple regulators to ONE driver, you can set the resistor for any diode that falls outside spec for a given batch. You can set control for THOUSANDS of diodes safely with ONE potentiometer, if you want to, so long as they have the same ratio of maximum current to threshold current. For any diode's resistor, calculate value by 1.25/A where A is required maximum current. Pick the nearest preferred value ABOVE the calculated value, then calculate the required resistance to parallel with it, to get the total resistance needed if the initial value is more than 1% out. Calculate to find the power dissipation for each, so they won't burn out in use. The board layout has space for this, when driving a single diode up to at least 1.5 A, but bigger resistors may be needed if using an LM338. The circuit MUST monitor the high side of ONE laser diode, but other diodes and resistors can safely use whatever current the regulator makes available to them. Ganging regulators is the same, common the ADJ pins, you still only need to monitor ONE laser diode. Ideally, pick ALL duplicate components from the same high grade batch, and leave a little headroom to allow for slight differences. The odd loss of a laser diode, if you like to push the envelope, is MORE than made up for by the ease of building a simple array extensible by few, and cheap, parts. This is one of the joys of a proper high side driver.
No matter how big the laser system, you only need three drivers, one per primary colour (plus one for any unusual extra colours you might use, such as 405 nm). You do NOT need one per diode here! :) Given the quality of the ideal potentiometer, this is a Good Thing, those cost. But, less than a diode driver costs so this still saves plenty. Remember that the high load voltage capability (up to about 3V short of supply, which in turn can be up to 36V) means you can string laser diodes in SERIES from one resistor too, as an alternative to parallel connection. With this driver (fitted with LM338 instead of LM317) you could likely modulate a 32V 100W floodlamp LED with a 1 MHz sawtooth wave, but I can't think why the hell anyone would want to.
(From: Sam.)
I have tested a handcrafted sample of one of these using a dummy load (2 silicon diodes in series) and that worked as advertised with no overshoot when driven with a squarewave and a frequency response to at least what is described above. While this is not exhaustive, the results do seem promising.
Temperature Compensation For Laser Drivers Based On LM317 Regulators (From: Crow (alias Lostgallifreyan).) Laser diodes need stable drive, especially when driven close to their safe limit. High power DVD diodes and multimode diodes may mode hop, so controlling power is less feasible than controlling current. This is because there may be at least two specific currents in some range that can produce a given output power, and is also why these diodes rarely come with photodiodes built in.
This means that the only other significant thing we can easily control to maintain drive close to safe maximum output is the diode's operating temperature; or in this case, the current with respect to whatever that temperature happens to be. Then, barring mode-hops, the output of a direct injection laser diode is stable enough to predict, which means that all we really need to do is specify the maximum current for the diode's own safety, at the minimum temperature at which we will run it.
Then again, there are those who like to use LM317-type circuits because they're cheap, powerful, accurate, and can even be modulated to 1 MHz or more with any waveformm. We may also like to push for the best safe current at ANY temperature (within reason). As all these circuits have one thing in common, a sense resistor, the best place to easily compensate for temperature is to modify this resistance directly. Here is a way to do it.
This is a bit terse, but complete in detail. (Reading on the net about thermistor selection will help too). What it does is use an array of two or three surface-mount negative temperature coefficient (NTC) thermistors, bonded to the laser diode's heatsink, and connected directly to parallel the sense resistor. Apart from taking this thermistor resistance into account when calulating current for any LM317-based driver, no other modification to any circuit is needed.
An example: The Opnext/Hitachi Laser Diode HL6526FM
The current for 80 mW output at specified temperature was measured as:
 Sample  0°C=107 mA  Sample  0°C=108 mA  Sample  0°C=109 mA  Sample  0°C=109 mA    1:   25°C=116 mA    2:   25°C=118 mA   3:    25°C=118 mA   4:    25°C=118 mA         50°C=133 mA         50°C=136 mA         50°C=136 mA         50°C=136 mA
 RS order code 247-7244, 150 ohm, SMT NTC thermistor, b constant of 2750,  5% tolerance and low cost.
 Power rating at 25°C            125mW  Optimum working dissipation     1mW  Resistance tolerance            5%  b constant                      2750 to 4100  Thermal dissipation constant    1.5mW/°C  Thermal time constant           4 seconds  Operating temperature range     -55°C to +125°C  Dimensions                      L=2, W=1.25, TO5 Here are the equations for deriving values from the technical data, 1K scale, 2.326K at 0°C and 0.49K at 50°C:
 T = K(R/1000)   T is value of the compound thermistor at given temperature,                  K is the known value of a 1K thermistor at given temperature,                  R is the known value of the compound thermistor at 25°C.
    1/F + 1/T    I is the resulting current in amps supplied by the regulator. I = ---------    F is the value of the known fixed resistance,        0.8       T is carried over from before.
P = T(1.25/T)^2  P is the resulting power dissipation at given temperature. If T is 75 ohms, made from two 150 ohm NTC thermistors in parallel, and F is a network of metal film resistors equal to 12.4 ohms at 1% tolerance, the regulator tracks the current/temperature curve of the laser diode extremely well, and the total regulator parts cost is less than £2.00.
                                             _________    +---/\/\/\---+          I for 0°C-50°C                    I|         |O  |     F      |                                  -----------| LM317 T |---+            +---+-----------           0°C=107.97 mA                     |_________|   |     T      |   |            25°C=117.47 mA                         A|        +---/\/\/\---+   |          50°C=134.82 mA                          |          Thermistor     |                                                  +-------------------------+ Then the power dissipation will be:
          0°C=8.96 mW            They will be dissipating a lot more power than the optimum 1 mW,          25°C=20.8 mW            but well within specs for the operating temperature range. They          50°C=21.3 mW            will be thermally clamped, bonded to the laser diode heatsink. Note: While scaling is excellent, the offset isn't, given only 5% tolerance in the thermistors, so a 1% metal film resistor network must be built with a variable resistance to finely tune it. The statement (1/75+1/(1/(1/(4*3.3)+1/(100+470))))/0.8 allows a 470 ohm multiturn preset to set the current between about 4 mA and 6 mA off-range, just enough to accommodate a 5% error. While it looks safe, the calculation predicts a very non-linear response, so this one must be tested. The main resistance will be four 3.3 ohm resistors in series, parallel with a network of series values, 100 ohms and the 470 ohm preset. Which is wired so the current falls, not rises, if it goes open circuit.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Parallel Laser Diode Driver 1 (Circuit and portions of description from Szabo Gabor.) Unlike most other laser diode driver circuits, this one essentially robs current from the diode so that it should be able to be added to most existing constant current systems without modifying their design. Use with caution though as they will see a dynamically varying load, so AC or transient behavior may not be predictable. See Parallel Laser Diode Driver 1 This circuit can operate with modulation because of the leaky integrator's averaging effect. The time constant can be changed by modifying the 3.3 uF capacitor. It's currently set to ~15 ms for our 78.125 kHz modulation, but in CW mode there's no need for this capacitor at all. This example uses light feedback, but that is not necessary. Another benefit of schemes like this is that it should be impossible to damage the laser diode from overcurrent unless the constant current driver becomes unstable. Of course, it must be set at the highest current desired. Then the parallel circuit can reduces current from there.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. More Laser Diode Driver Schematics Here are a few more. Some have errors!!! See notes below. And the circuits found in the manufacturer's application notes are often not tested. :) Skip Campisi has a nice article entitled "Laser Clinic" Poptronics, June 2001. There are schematics with complete parts lists with component values selected for the Sharp LT022MC 780 nm LD, Mitsubishi ML720 1,300 nm LD, and the Hitachi HL6712G 670 nm LD (all 5 mW max) and a pulsed driver for the high power LASD59 (similar to the RCA 40861 and LDs from OSRAM and others). CAUTION: While the author does provide some basic laser safety information, it would have been nice to have more on the the critical drive requirements of laser diodes. I'm afraid there may be some disappointment when more than a few laser diodes turn into DELDs. He notes the effects of ESD and reverse polarity but doesn't appear to deal with the very important maximum current ratings. The only way to set up these laser diodes for maximum safe (for the LD, that is) output is with a laser power meter since their characteristics vary from device to device.
Circuit Cellar Magazine has a design using a PLD that will drive a typical low power laser diode using optical feedback and includes modulation. See: Project 247: Laser Diode Controller. It can probably do a lot more than they have implemented without requiring additional parts. However, circuit to simply provide the features shown would only cost about $2 for discrete parts or a laser diode driver chip, no downloading of firmware needed! I'm also not convinced it handles power cycling or fault conditions reliably. Laser Circuits at the Discovery Circuits Web Site has links to a few, mostly laser diode related, schematics. SatSleuth Laser Schematic Collection has a variety of links - many back to Sam's Laser FAQ - but a few might be useful.
Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Communications Systems Using Diode Lasers Driver Enhancements to Provide Modulation Capability Raw laser diodes typically have an electrical->optical frequency response that extends to hundreds of MHz or beyond. However, most simple drivers designed for continuous wave (CW) operation (including all of the discrete circuits described elsewhere in this chapter) have such heavy filtering and isolation from power supply transients and noise that control beyond a few Hz is usually not possible. In principle, modifications to improve the frequency response by reducing the filtering, and to provide a modulation input, should be straightforward. However, in practice there are all sorts of ways to screw up resulting in either unacceptable behavior or a dead laser diode or both and it is usually much better and easier to drive the laser diode in such a way that it never goes into complete cutoff:
(From: Jonathan Bromley ([email protected]).)
"I'll second that. Modulating a laser to complete cutoff is a very, very bad game for all sorts of reasons: The light versus current behavior is hideously non-linear below about 10% of full output, so you really need dynamic feedback control - but the photodiodes tend to be slow, so that's not on. Spectral quality, and beam shape, go to blazes at low power levels lasers don't turn on from fully-off anywhere near as fast as they can vary intensity around the 50% level. It's pig-difficult to design the modulation circuit so it is guaranteed never to overshoot the current that gives 100% full light output (which is essential, because even very brief over-power transients dramatically shorten the laser's life). But if the information from Honeywell and others is to be believed, the new vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) are much better behaved and can be modulated to extinction at quite high rates. They're also extremely cute bits of device technology. A couple of simple such modulation circuits are shown below. CAUTION: Since both the following affect the optical feedback, attempt at your own risk!
The following applies to laser diode power supplies TO-LD1 and RE-LD1 through RE-LD3. Similar modifications could be made to RE-LD4 but this is left as an exercise for the student! :-)
A bi-level modulation scheme could be easily implemented by connecting a general purpose NPN transistor across an additional resistor (at point XY). Then, full power will be achieved with the transistor turned on and reduced power with it turned off. Select a value for R2 that will still maintain the current above the lasing threshold - 1K is just a start.
                          X                           o                           |                           +-----+                           |C    |     Typical transistors: 2N2222, 2N3904.                   R1    |/      /    TTL Input o---/\/\---|  Q1   \ R2                   1K    |\      / 1K                           |E    |            Y o------------+-----+
Here is another circuit which should achieve somewhat linear control of laser power since optical power output should be proportional to photodiode current. Resistor values shown are just a start - you will need to determine these for your specific laser diode and operating point.
                                   R                                    o                                    |                                    \ R1       X                                    / 10K      o                                    \          |                           C1 10uF  |        |/ C                       o------)|----+--------|    Q1                             -  +   |        |\ E                  Line level        |  2N3904  |                    audio           /          /                                 R2 \       R3 \                       o        10K /       1K /                       |            |          |         Y o-----------+------------+----------+
Also see the section: Integrated Circuits for Driving Laser Diodes since most of these ICs are designed with speed modulation capability built in. Diode Laser Based Line-of-Sight Communicators Here are a couple of sites with complete plans for systems using readily available parts: Derek Weston (Email: [email protected]) has constructed an IrDA tranceiver based loosely on the driver in RE-LD1 and a Crystal Semiconductor CorporationCS8130 IR transceiver IC. A complete description of this project may be found at his: UPN Laser Transceiver Web Site on the Realtime Control Web site. Peter Philips' Laser Link Communicator was originally published in "Electronics Australia", July 1997. This allows for the transmission of high quality audio up to distances of several hundred meters. Either a visible or IR laser diode may be used (the latter providing for greater security but increases the difficulty of initial alignment).
Back to Sam's Laser FAQ Table of Contents. Back to Diode Laser Power Supplies Sub-Table of Contents. Forward to Helium-Neon Lasers. Sam's Laser FAQ, Copyright © 1994-2020, Samuel M. Goldwasser, All Rights Reserved. I may be contacted via the Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Email Links Page.
1 note · View note
nationin · 4 years
Photo
Tumblr media
ESP8266 vs Arduino Which one you will use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hit the Like ❤️ and Share with your Friends 😍 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Follow (@nationin) for more stuff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . . _____________________________________________________ #arduino #arduinouno #arduinoprojects #arduinomega #arduinoproject #arduinofun #arduinoday #arduinolove #servo #servomotor #servomotors #electronics #hobbyelectronics #electromagnetic #electricalengineering #electronics #electronspark #electronicsolvers #electronicsolution #electronicsengineering #transistor #voltage #electrical #electricalengineering #electricalengineers #electronic #arduino #technology #electronicslovers #electricalprojects #sensor #capacitor #resistor https://www.instagram.com/p/CBAb7G8Db8z/?igshid=1tp6r2eg0a6co
0 notes
mokotechnologyltd · 5 years
Text
Through hole PCB vs. Surface mount PCB
One of the first decisions in making a PCB is to choose the style and type of components we are going to use. This mostly depends on the electrical requirements of the PCB. However, once we meet the electrical requirements, there are a variety of available footprints and configurations to choose from. The type of components we choose will affect the appearance and size of the finished PCB. In the early days, we dealt with components having long leads by inserting them manually into plated through holes on the PCB. We then soldered the leads to form strong interconnections with the holes. This is what we know as a through hole PCB assembly.
With the passage of time, manufacturers prefer to use a modern assembly method that relies on components whose leads are only attached to the surface of the PCB. This method doesn’t require any mating hole. This is what we know as the Surface Mount Technology (SMT). However, it was known as planar mounting in the earlier days.
Today we will look at both of these techniques and we will help you in choosing between them according to your needs.
Through hole PCB
Through hole components are mostly available in two types of packages which can be axial or radial. Axial through hole components have electronic leads along their axis of symmetry. A basic resistor is a classic example of a through-hole component as you can notice that the electrical leads are present along its cylindrical axis of symmetry. Other examples are inductors, capacitors, and diodes.
On the other hand, radial components have electrical leads which are projected from the same surface of the component. These are often preferred as it allows us to mount them on a board in a way which takes up a smaller space.
Manufacturers discovered through-hole components when they were looking to improve efficiency and they weren’t concerned with the aesthetics. It was a tradeoff between mechanical stability and signal integrity. Manufacturers were not focusing on the required space of the components. Therefore, they didn’t concern themselves with signal integrity problems.  However, as demand for PCBs increased, manufacturers had to rethink their approach. Now power consumption, board space requirement, and signal integrity became a concern. Manufacturers now want to use components that come in smaller packages and provide the same functionality. This is where we look towards surface-mount components.
Pros and Cons of Through hole PCBPros
Through-hole technology is very reliable as there is a stronger connection between the PCB and the components. This is why most of the manufactures still use through-hole technology. We especially rely on this technology in those applications where the PCB goes through fast acceleration and suffers from increased stress.
It is very easier to replace through-hole components. That is why it is easier to perform tests by using through-hole technology. This is the primary reason for using through-hole for prototyping.
Cons
These components need a lot of space to place them on a PCB as compared to the surface-mounted components.
We have to manually perform most of the through-hole operations.
Surface Mount PCB
Surface-mounted components dominate the modern PCB design. These components don’t rely on electrical leads. We can solder these components directly on the PCB surface during the assembly process. Surface-mounted components are mostly used where we have limited space and we are concerned with the component size. The major benefit of surface mounted components is that we can use them at high frequencies and speeds without facing any signal integrity problems.
Pros and cons of Surface Mount PCBPros
Surface-mounted components are much smaller in comparison to the through-hole components. This allows us to increase the overall density of the finished electronic product.
We can place surface mounted components on both sides of the PCB.
We can reduce the production time by using a Pick and Place machine for automating the process.
Cons
These components are not suitable for applications involving high power consumption.
We cannot use surface-mounted components for testing or prototyping of circuits.
Surface Mount vs. Through-hole Technology Costs
Surface-mounted components are usually much smaller than the through-hole components. However, this doesn’t imply that surface mounted components will always cost less. The surface-mounted component may have a similar price of their through-hole counterparts. However, we need to consider the costs per component after automating the assembly process. This way, we can clearly see that surface mount is a more economical process.
We need to drill holes for placing the through-hole components. This leads to incurring of tooling costs. On the other hand, surface mounted components don’t need drilling. This leads to a further reduction of the overall expenses.
Overall Comparison between Surface Mount PCB and Through-Hole PCB
With this detailed comparison, we can safely conclude that surface mounted assembly is more cost-effective and efficient than the through-hole assembly. Most of the advanced electronic products involve surface mount technology. However, when we require special electrical, thermal, and mechanical applications then through-hole technology is still a viable option.
It is a fact that technology and science are making continuous progress. And it is also a fact that new products will replace old products. But it doesn’t imply that it is necessary to eliminate conventional technology. For instance, multi-layered PCBs are more efficient than single-layered PCBs. However, they are also more advanced and complex. Can we use them in the control dials of an aircraft? Yes. Should we use them in a simple toy car or a clock? Definitely No. Merits of some conventional things can still make them play a vital role in the future to come.
MOKO Technology is a company dedicated to providing smart device solutions. We have a professional R&D team for developing printed circuit boards (PCBs) and embedded firmware. MOKO Smart has years of experience in PCB designing and manufacturing. We specialize in mass production using both the Through-Hole and Surface Mount Technologies. MOKO Technology promises quality service and excellent performance. Feel free to reach out to us if you have any questions or if you want to inquire about a quote.
0 notes
audio-luddite · 5 years
Text
I found a clue.
Rather than get an irrational belief that this technology or that is the best I deal with what I can afford that is pretty damn good.  I have been around for a while and have some experience.  I am also curious and want to know why things are the way they are.
In home audio there are two main camps Vacuum Tubes vs Solid State. I know there are differences, but combat may occur in the discussions as to which is better.  It is far better to acknowledge there are differences and that you may have a favorite. 
The internet is full of crap.  There are 100 people expounding their opinions as fact for every one reasoned conclusion. ( I am in the later camp of course). But there is gold among the dross.
In the 1960s there was the seismic shift in audio from tubes to transistor.  Back then home audio was not that great.  The big names in Speakers were JBL, Cerwin Vega, Bozak, KLH, and Klipsch.  Many of those made the real money in sound reinforcement PA and movie theaters. Some are still around. They were fairly efficient and required relatively low power.  A BIG home amplifier was 60 Watts.
The foundation of High End Audiophile hobby was a magazine edited by a J.G. Holt.  He was the original golden ear.  He would listen to a piece of equipment and draw response curves freehand. He identified the good and the less good and people paid attention.  You can read his reviews online from the “Stereophile” archive.
He was the first person to designate a solid state amplifier as equal to or better than tubes.  Specifically one of the respected Tube amps of the day was the Dynaco MK3.  I had a pair once. Very good, and collectable today as well as tweakable.  That company built a basic 60 Watt / channel amp in the mid to late 60′s called the 120.  That was the same power rating as a pair of MK 3s.  JG Holt praised it and declared its differences as better.  That was later superseded by the Harman Kardon Citation 12 of which I have one today.
Here was a skilled and experienced and respected person comparing the two technologies and declaring a winner.  Since then to be sure much better tube equipment has come out but this was battle at the start of the war and transistors won it.  Much better solid state equipment also exists now.
I had a friend who had a Dynaco 120 and who then replaced it with a Citation 12.  I know these devices.  One thing that I had noticed was that the 120 had these “extra” capacitors and curious loops of wire.  The loops were obviously inductors, but I never investigated the circuit or where they were in the line.
The clue I found recently was that the entire output signal was routed through these capacitors and the inductors.  That is called capacitor coupling.  Thing is that these were bipolar electrolytic capacitors which are effectively very fast batteries.  A signal must pass through a pot full of chemical reactions.  The inductor was placed in the same path.  Capacitors will not pass DC voltage but do pass higher AC frequencies, up to a limit for electrolytics.  Inductors pass DC but blocks higher AC frequencies. Together they are a band pass filter.  Everything you hear goes through these devices.
In tube audio amplifiers (with a very few exceptions) the output goes through a transformer to speakers. The transformer passes AC signals and cannot pass DC.  It has an upper limit to the frequencies (often very high) but it too is a band pass filter.  So my clue was that in trying to match the basic sound of tubes Dynaco used capacitor output coupling to mimic the effect of an output transformer.
By comparison the Citation output runs through a few resistors and a modest filter of an inductor and a capacitor on the sides of the main signal output. That is also a filter of the higher frequencies, but not the low ones.  The things you hear do not go through big loops of wire or pots of chemicals. It is more direct.
OK people with far more skill than I will say all the signals pass through capacitors at the front and in the middle of the circuit.  True that.  But those are much smaller and impedance is higher.  A basic tweak is to replace those with foil capacitors which do not depend on chemicals where those exist in the line.
These early devices tried to mimic tubes by treating the output. The Citation had better Bass and cleaner more direct sound but did not use output coupling.  It is not “modern” compared to today, but it is still pretty good.
There is an expensive and highly respected brand called Mcintosh which uses output transformers in transistor amplifiers which effects the sound and improves toughness of the device.  It also does this mimic thing. Famously the Grateful Dead used those in their “Wall of Sound”.  They still make those and the tube stuff and have devoted fans.  Really expensive though.
I think Bob Carver the famous Iconoclast designer attributes the “Tube sound” to the method of coupling an amplifier output and impedance.  He lives under the hood of this stuff and should know.
So rather than listening to tubes are we listening to loops of wire and pots of chemicals and like it?
0 notes
cheapheatandac · 5 years
Text
The Surprising Details Regarding Condenser Vs Capacitor That Most People Do Not Know About
The Most Popular Condenser Vs Capacitor
Sometimes capacitors are weak and will need to get replaced. The majority of the second you can tell that a capacitor is bad since it will be swollen up. For instance, capacitors with paper as dielectric are called paper capacitor and thecapacitors with mica for a dielectric are referred to as mica capacitor.
Condenser Vs Capacitor Features
Capacitor is named based on the dielectric material employed in it. On the flip side, capacitors are frequently used as filters in combination with resistors and inductors. A weak air conditioner capacitor can cause your system to consume a good deal of electricity, which means you wind up with bigger energy bills each month.
Choosing Condenser Vs Capacitor Is Simple
Condensers are utilized as part of thermal power plants, ac systems, distilleries and so forth. Therefore, because a condenser absorbs large volumes of steam at quite low pressure, it provides a very good analogy for a system which could absorb lots of charge at relatively low electrical pressure. It has a couple of plates with voltage running between them and the one that is made of lighter material, acts as a diaphragm. It is a term used for a capacitor in the past. A condenser may also be referred to as a capacitor. Air-cooled condensers are definitely the most frequently encountered sort of condenser in residential systems.
The post The Surprising Details Regarding Condenser Vs Capacitor That Most People Do Not Know About appeared first on Cheap Heating and Air Conditioning Repair.
from Cheap Heating and Air Conditioning Repair https://ift.tt/2KXbW5H
0 notes
soukacatv · 6 years
Text
Reading About the Analog vs. Digital Signals | Soukacatv.com
Overview
We live in an analog world. There are an infinite amount of colors to paint an object (even if the difference is indiscernible to our eye), there are an infinite number of tones we can hear, and there are an infinite number of smells we can smell. The common theme among all of these analog signals is their infinite possibilities.
Digital signals and objects deal in the realm of the discrete or finite, meaning there is a limited set of values they can be. That could mean just two total possible values, 255, 4,294,967,296, or anything as long as it’s not ∞ (infinity).
Working with electronics means dealing with both analog and digital signals, inputs and outputs. Our electronics projects have to interact with the real, analog world in some way, but most of our microprocessors, computers, and logic units are purely digital components. These two types of signals are like different electronic languages; some electronics components are bi-lingual, others can only understand and speak one of the two.
In this tutorial, we’ll cover the basics of both digital and analog signals, including examples of each. We’ll also talk about analog and digital circuits, and components.
HDMI Encoder Modulator,16in1 Digital Headend, HD RF Modulator at SOUKA https://www.soukacatv.com/.
Suggested Reading
The concepts of analog and digital stand on their own, and don’t require a lot of previous electronics knowledge. That said, if you haven’t already, you should peek through some of these tutorials:
Voltage, Current, Resistance and Ohm’s Law
What is a Circuit
And     some mathematics concepts: reading graphs, and understanding the     difference between finite and infinite sets.
Analog Signals
Define: Signals
Before going too much further, we should talk a bit about what a signal actually is, electronic signals specifically (as opposed to traffic signals, albums by the ultimate power-trio, or a general means for communication). The signals we’re talking about are time-varying “quantities” which convey some sort of information. In electrical engineering the quantity that’s time-varying is usually voltage (if not that, then usually current). So when we talk about signals, just think of them as a voltage that’s changing over time.
Signals are passed between devices in order to send and receive information, which might be video, audio, or some sort of encoded data. Usually the signals are transmitted through wires, but they could also pass through the air via radio frequency (RF) waves. Audio signals, for example might be transferred between your computer’s audio card and speakers, while data signals might be passed through the air between a tablet and a WiFi router.
Analog Signal Graphs
Because a signal varies over time, it’s helpful to plot it on a graph where time is plotted on the horizontal, x-axis, and voltage on the vertical, y-axis. Looking at a graph of a signal is usually the easiest way to identify if it’s analog or digital; a time-versus-voltage graph of an analog signal should be smooth and continuous.
While these signals may be limited to a range of maximum and minimum values, there are still an infinite number of possible values within that range. For example, the analog voltage coming out of your wall socket might be clamped between -120V and +120V, but, as you increase the resolution more and more, you discover an infinite number of values that the signal can actually be (like 64.4V, 64.42V, 64.424V, and infinite, increasingly precise values).
Example Analog Signals
Video and audio transmissions are often transferred or recorded using analog signals. The composite video coming out of an old RCA jack, for example, is a coded analog signal usually ranging between 0 and 1.073V. Tiny changes in the signal have a huge effect on the color or location of the video.
An analog signal representing one line of composite video data.
Pure audio signals are also analog. The signal that comes out of a microphone is full of analog frequencies and harmonics, which combine to make beautiful music.
Digital Signals
Digital signals must have a finite set of possible values. The number of values in the set can be anywhere between two and a-very-large-number-that’s-not-infinity. Most commonly digital signals will be one of two values – like either 0V or 5V. Timing graphs of these signals look like square waves.
Or a digital signal might be a discrete representation of an analog waveform. Viewed from afar, the wave function below may seem smooth and analog, but when you look closely there are tiny discrete steps as the signal tries to approximate values:
That’s the big difference between analog and digital waves. Analog waves are smooth and continuous, digital waves are stepping, square, and discrete.
Example Digital Signals
Not all audio and video signals are analog. Standardized signals like HDMI for video (and audio) and MIDI, I2S, or AC'97for audio are all digitally transmitted.
Most communication between integrated circuits is digital. Interfaces like serial, I2C, and SPI all transmit data via a coded sequence of square waves.
Serial peripheral interface (SPI) uses many digital signals to transmit data between devices.
Analog and Digital Circuits
Analog Electronics
Most of the fundamental electronic components – resistors, capacitors, inductors, diodes, transistors, and operational amplifiers – are all inherently analog. Circuits built with a combination of solely these components are usually analog.
Analog circuits are usually complex combinations of op amps, resistors, caps, and other foundational electronic components. This is an example of a class B analog audio amplifier.
Analog circuits can be very elegant designs with many components, or they can be very simple, like two resistors combining to make a voltage divider. In general, though, analog circuits are much more difficult to design than those which accomplish the same task digitally. It takes a special kind of analog circuit wizard to design an analog radio receiver, or an analog battery charger; digital components exist to make those designs much simpler.
Analog circuits are usually much more susceptible to noise (small, undesired variations in voltage). Small changes in the voltage level of an analog signal may produce significant errors when being processed.
Digital Electronics
Digital circuits operate using digital, discrete signals. These circuits are usually made of a combination of transistors and logic gates and, at higher levels, microcontrollers or other computing chips. Most processors, whether they’re big beefy processors in your computer, or tiny little microcontrollers, operate in the digital realm.
Digital circuits make use of components like logic gates, or more complicated digital ICs (usually represented by rectangles with labeled pins extending from them).
Digital circuits usually use a binary scheme for digital signaling. These systems assign two different voltages as two different logic levels – a high voltage (usually 5V, 3.3V, or 1.8V) represents one value and a low voltage (usually 0V) represents the other.
Although digital circuits are generally easier to design, they do tend to be a bit more expensive than an equally tasked analog circuit.
Analog and Digital Combined
It’s not rare to see a mixture of analog and digital components in a circuit. Although microcontrollers are usually digital beasts, they often have internal circuitry which enables them to interface with analog circuitry (analog-to-digital converters, pulse-width modulation, and digital-to-analog converters. An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) allows a microcontroller to connect to an analog sensor (like photocells or temperature sensors), to read in an analog voltage. The less common digital-to-analog converter allows a microcontroller to produce analog voltages, which is handy when it needs to make sound.
Resources and Going Further
Now that you know the difference between analog and digital signals, we’d suggest checking out the Analog to Digital Conversion tutorial. Working with microcontrollers, or really any logic-based electronics, means working in the digital realm most of the time. If you want to sense light, temperature, or interface a microcontroller with a variety of other analog sensors, you’ll need to know how to convert the analog voltage they produce into a digital value.
Also, consider reading our Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) tutorial. PWM is a trick microcontrollers can use to make a digital signal appear to be analog.
Here are some other subjects which deal heavily with digital interfaces:
Binary
Logic Levels
Serial Communication
SPI Communication
I2C     Communication
IR Communication
Or, if you’d like to delve further into the analog realm, consider checking out these tutorials:
Voltage Dividers
Resistors
Diodes
Capacitors
Transistors
Established in 2000, the Soukacatv.com (DSW) main products are modulators both in
digital and analog modulators, amplifier and combiner. We are the leading communication supplier in manufacturing the headend system in China. Our 16 in 1 and 24 in 1 now are the most popular products all over the world. For more, please access to https://www.soukacatv.com/.
 Source: https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/analog-vs-digital/all
0 notes