#Developmental Projects in Ladakh

[rajafatema]

The Ladakh Protest: The 21-day Hunger Strike led by Sonam Wangchuk 

Ladakh, famously known as “Mars on Earth”, is the perfect destination where the mind slows down and the soul finds its path.

It is the northeastern Union territory of India, known for its highest mountain ranges, mesmerizing landscapes, beautiful deep valleys, crystal clear blue lakes, diverse wildlife, highest motorable mountain roads, Buddhist heritage, and the overall picturesque beauty of the place.

Ladakh: A union territory without legislature

Ladakh, which was a part of Jammu and Kashmir since 1847, was separated from Indian-administered Kashmir in 2019 and was reconstituted as a Union territory on October 31, 2019.

People of Ladakh have constantly demanded separate territory since the 1930s due to the unfair treatment of Kashmir and the prevailing cultural differences between people of Kashmir and Ladakh.

The formation of Ladakh as a separate Union territory was widely celebrated. Still, people were disappointed because it was made a UT without a legislative assembly and would have a lieutenant governor, while Jammu and Kashmir had a legislature.

What does it mean to have no legislature in Ladakh?

Unlike J&K, Ladakh cannot elect its own representative.

Ladakh will be ruled directly by the central government through a lieutenant governor as an administrator.

The President of India has the power to form rules and regulations for Ladakh, according to Article 240.

Sonam Wangchuk following his Father’s footsteps

Sonam Wangyal was born in 1925 in a small village in the Leh district of Ladakh. He worked his entire life for the rights of the people of Ladakh. He had strong secular beliefs.

He was appointed as the MLC of Jammu and Kashmir from 1957–1967 and as the MLA from 1967–1972, due to his selfless service toward the people of Ladakh.

Wangyal was also an active member in the campaign for ST status for Ladakhis, which was carried out between 1982 and 1984. 

In 1984, on his five-day hunger strike, the former Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, visited Leh and requested Wangyal to withdraw from the strike with the promise of granting the status of ST to the people of Ladakh.

Following his father’s strong morals and values and showcasing his devotion to the land and people of Ladakh, Sonam Wangchuk, a nature activist, engineer, innovator, and educationalist, began a “climate fast for 21 days” on March 6, 2024.

Why are they protesting?

The primary goal behind the protest is to raise awareness about the fragile ecosystem of Ladakh endangered by the growing industrial and developmental projects approved in New Delhi without consent, a threat posed as a result of having no legislative assembly in the Union territory of Ladakh.

The residents of Ladakh have two key demands:

Full-fledged statehood for Ladakh: the residents have demanded to elevate Ladakh’s status as a Union territory to a full-fledged state. This would enable Ladakh to have its own government and the right to form its own rules and regulations in favor of the land and people of the territory.

Integration of Ladakh in the 6th Schedule of the Constitution: The 6th Schedule aims to protect areas with tribal and indigenous populations. By including Ladakh in the 6th schedule, it would allow the state to establish autonomous districts and regional councils.

These elected bodies will have the power to administer and protect the tribal regions of the area. It would give the Ladakhis more control over water management, land use, and cultural preservation.

What is the government’s response to the ongoing protest?

Unlike the response and action taken upon the hunger strike carried out by Wangchuk’s father, the present-day government is MIA. 

The current government seems unbothered by the demands and protests in Ladakh, just the way it is, and the deteriorating situation in Manipur. 

The pioneers of the movement and every other active citizen in and out of Ladakh are furious about the inaction of the government and the PM, who knowingly promised in his 2019 manifesto of Lok Sabha, that Ladakh will be incorporated into the 6th schedule of the constitution. But apparently, they failed to honor their promises.

Lack of media coverage:

The lack of media coverage is infuriating for the people of Ladakh and the active citizens of India.

Although the independent media and journalists who are physically present in the ongoing protests do cover the news for the country, But it is disappointing to witness the lack of coverage by mainstream media and the big houses.

The scarcity of coverage of this major issue conceals the truth from the nation. The nation wants to know more about the concerns and affairs of the territory. Unless there is some news from the local media houses, the lack of coverage by the recognized media houses keeps the common man from knowing what is really happening there.

The current news on the Ladakh protest:

According to the current news,

Wangchuk survived solely on water and salt during the 21-day hunger strike (inspired by Gandhiji), which lasted from March 6th to March 26th.

In his speech, he talked about the “21-day fast"—that 21 days was the longest fast that Gandhiji kept during the independence movement.

Wangchuk states that the 21-day fast is over, but the protest will still continue. They will only rest when the government agrees to fulfill their demands.

Wangchuk said, “After me, women will begin a 10-day fast tomorrow. This will be followed by youth and Buddhist monks. Then it could be women, or I could come back. This cycle will go on.”

After ending his 21-day fast, Wangchuk stated “We will continue our struggle (in support of our demands). The gathering of 10,000 people at the venue and the participation of over 60,000 others over the past 20 days is a testimony of the people's aspirations.” 

Conclusion:

All things considered, Ladakh, the "Land of High Passes," stands at a crossroads. While the echoes of their protests might fade from national headlines, the Ladakhi people's yearning for a brighter future persists. Whether they find resolution in the sixth schedule status or the full-throated roar of statehood, one thing is certain: Ladakh's story is far from over.

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 20th Dec. In a significant shift after years of tension, Bharat and China have embarked on cautious diplomatic overtures to repair their strained relationship. The October meeting between Bharatiya Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping marked a pivotal moment, initiating a dialogue after five years of deadlock. However, a new survey titled “Pulse Of The People: State of Bharat-China Relations Survey Report 2024” reveals that while the government pursues engagement, the Bharatiya populace remains deeply skeptical of China’s intentions. This tension between diplomatic gestures and public sentiment encapsulates the complexity of Bharat-China relations in 2024. The survey, published by the Takshashila Institution, provides a nuanced picture of how Bharatiya view the evolving dynamic between the two neighbors. It identifies the border dispute as the “biggest stressor” in the relationship—a sentiment echoed by both Bharatiya and Chinese officials. National Security Adviser Ajit Doval’s recent meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi highlighted the renewed emphasis on resolving the border impasse, particularly in eastern Ladakh. Yet, despite these talks, the survey underscores a prevailing belief that mutual trust remains elusive, and Bharatiya overwhelmingly support strengthening defense infrastructure alongside diplomatic efforts. The most striking finding of the survey is the domestic sentiment regarding Bharat’s global alignments. A commanding 69.2% of respondents believe that if forced to choose, Bharat should align with the US-led West rather than with China and Russia. This preference for the West reflects a pragmatic outlook shaped by Bharat’s aspirations for global leadership and the strategic benefits of aligning with established democratic powers. It also indicates a public wariness of China’s growing regional influence, particularly its inroads into Bharat’s immediate neighborhood. https://twitter.com/TakshashilaInst/status/1869016939865293013 The data presents a duality in public opinion. While a significant portion of respondents (49.6%) agree that greater trade with China aligns with Bharat’s developmental and security interests, and over half (56.3%) support Chinese investments for their potential to create employment, the trust deficit runs deep. A substantial 61.5% of respondents believe that a more democratic China could improve bilateral ties, though 46.6% maintain that the relationship will remain fraught regardless of Beijing’s leadership. Interestingly, the survey also delves into broader geopolitical concerns. Respondents see China’s influence in Bharat’s neighborhood as the second-most pressing issue after the border dispute, reflecting anxieties over projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and Beijing’s growing clout in Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Myanmar. At the same time, respondents are skeptical about the effectiveness of multilateral initiatives like the Quad in countering China, with 50.8% describing its impact as “somewhat effective” and 44.4% labeling it “ineffective.” On cultural and ideological issues, the survey offers fascinating insights. An overwhelming 64% of respondents favor recognizing the Dalai Lama’s successor nominated by the Tibetan Administration-in-Exile, highlighting Bharat’s enduring sympathy for the Tibetan cause. Additionally, when it comes to Taiwan, a majority (54.4%) believe Bharat should adopt a peace-brokering role, emphasizing diplomacy over confrontation. These findings underscore the Bharatiya public’s nuanced approach to contentious issues, advocating for pragmatism without compromising on values. China’s official response to these developments has been measured. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian expressed Beijing’s willingness to “properly settle differences with sincerity,” aligning with the public’s desire for dialogue. However, the question remains whether this rhetoric can translate into action.

History suggests that China’s overtures often serve strategic objectives, raising concerns about the durability of its commitments. The survey also sheds light on the enduring mistrust stemming from China’s territorial ambitions and its opaque political ecosystem. While many respondents acknowledge the benefits of economic engagement, the shadow of past betrayals—such as the 1962 war and the 2020 Galwan clashes—continues to loom large. For the Bharatiya government, navigating this terrain requires balancing public skepticism with diplomatic pragmatism. At the heart of this delicate balancing act lies Bharat’s aspiration to emerge as a global power while safeguarding its sovereignty and interests. The preference for aligning with the US-led West reflects not only strategic considerations but also a broader ideological alignment with democratic values. Yet, this inclination does not preclude a pragmatic engagement with China, especially in areas of mutual benefit like trade and investment. The findings also offer a sobering reminder of the fragility of Bharat-China relations. While talks between Modi and Xi and the recent Doval-Wang meeting signal a thaw, the deep-seated mistrust between the two nations—and within their respective populations—suggests that the path to normalization will be long and fraught with challenges. For Bharat, building a robust defense posture and leveraging alliances like the Quad are critical to maintaining a position of strength in these negotiations. In conclusion, the “Pulse Of The People” survey underscores the complexity of Bharat-China relations at a pivotal moment in their shared history. While diplomatic channels are opening, public sentiment remains wary, advocating for a combination of military preparedness and cautious engagement. For Bharat, this dual approach is not just strategic but essential in navigating a future marked by both competition and cooperation with its northern neighbor. The thaw in relations, while promising, will require sustained effort, trust-building, and a commitment to addressing the core issues that continue to divide these two Asian giants. Whether this fragile détente can evolve into a stable partnership remains an open question, one that will shape the region’s geopolitical landscape in the years to come.     The post Bharat-China Relations: A Fragile Thaw Amid Persistent Domestic Skepticism appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 20th Dec. In a significant shift after years of tension, Bharat and China have embarked on cautious diplomatic overtures to repair their strained relationship. The October meeting between Bharatiya Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping marked a pivotal moment, initiating a dialogue after five years of deadlock. However, a new survey titled “Pulse Of The People: State of Bharat-China Relations Survey Report 2024” reveals that while the government pursues engagement, the Bharatiya populace remains deeply skeptical of China’s intentions. This tension between diplomatic gestures and public sentiment encapsulates the complexity of Bharat-China relations in 2024. The survey, published by the Takshashila Institution, provides a nuanced picture of how Bharatiya view the evolving dynamic between the two neighbors. It identifies the border dispute as the “biggest stressor” in the relationship—a sentiment echoed by both Bharatiya and Chinese officials. National Security Adviser Ajit Doval’s recent meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi highlighted the renewed emphasis on resolving the border impasse, particularly in eastern Ladakh. Yet, despite these talks, the survey underscores a prevailing belief that mutual trust remains elusive, and Bharatiya overwhelmingly support strengthening defense infrastructure alongside diplomatic efforts. The most striking finding of the survey is the domestic sentiment regarding Bharat’s global alignments. A commanding 69.2% of respondents believe that if forced to choose, Bharat should align with the US-led West rather than with China and Russia. This preference for the West reflects a pragmatic outlook shaped by Bharat’s aspirations for global leadership and the strategic benefits of aligning with established democratic powers. It also indicates a public wariness of China’s growing regional influence, particularly its inroads into Bharat’s immediate neighborhood. https://twitter.com/TakshashilaInst/status/1869016939865293013 The data presents a duality in public opinion. While a significant portion of respondents (49.6%) agree that greater trade with China aligns with Bharat’s developmental and security interests, and over half (56.3%) support Chinese investments for their potential to create employment, the trust deficit runs deep. A substantial 61.5% of respondents believe that a more democratic China could improve bilateral ties, though 46.6% maintain that the relationship will remain fraught regardless of Beijing’s leadership. Interestingly, the survey also delves into broader geopolitical concerns. Respondents see China’s influence in Bharat’s neighborhood as the second-most pressing issue after the border dispute, reflecting anxieties over projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and Beijing’s growing clout in Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Myanmar. At the same time, respondents are skeptical about the effectiveness of multilateral initiatives like the Quad in countering China, with 50.8% describing its impact as “somewhat effective” and 44.4% labeling it “ineffective.” On cultural and ideological issues, the survey offers fascinating insights. An overwhelming 64% of respondents favor recognizing the Dalai Lama’s successor nominated by the Tibetan Administration-in-Exile, highlighting Bharat’s enduring sympathy for the Tibetan cause. Additionally, when it comes to Taiwan, a majority (54.4%) believe Bharat should adopt a peace-brokering role, emphasizing diplomacy over confrontation. These findings underscore the Bharatiya public’s nuanced approach to contentious issues, advocating for pragmatism without compromising on values. China’s official response to these developments has been measured. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian expressed Beijing’s willingness to “properly settle differences with sincerity,” aligning with the public’s desire for dialogue. However, the question remains whether this rhetoric can translate into action.

History suggests that China’s overtures often serve strategic objectives, raising concerns about the durability of its commitments. The survey also sheds light on the enduring mistrust stemming from China’s territorial ambitions and its opaque political ecosystem. While many respondents acknowledge the benefits of economic engagement, the shadow of past betrayals—such as the 1962 war and the 2020 Galwan clashes—continues to loom large. For the Bharatiya government, navigating this terrain requires balancing public skepticism with diplomatic pragmatism. At the heart of this delicate balancing act lies Bharat’s aspiration to emerge as a global power while safeguarding its sovereignty and interests. The preference for aligning with the US-led West reflects not only strategic considerations but also a broader ideological alignment with democratic values. Yet, this inclination does not preclude a pragmatic engagement with China, especially in areas of mutual benefit like trade and investment. The findings also offer a sobering reminder of the fragility of Bharat-China relations. While talks between Modi and Xi and the recent Doval-Wang meeting signal a thaw, the deep-seated mistrust between the two nations—and within their respective populations—suggests that the path to normalization will be long and fraught with challenges. For Bharat, building a robust defense posture and leveraging alliances like the Quad are critical to maintaining a position of strength in these negotiations. In conclusion, the “Pulse Of The People” survey underscores the complexity of Bharat-China relations at a pivotal moment in their shared history. While diplomatic channels are opening, public sentiment remains wary, advocating for a combination of military preparedness and cautious engagement. For Bharat, this dual approach is not just strategic but essential in navigating a future marked by both competition and cooperation with its northern neighbor. The thaw in relations, while promising, will require sustained effort, trust-building, and a commitment to addressing the core issues that continue to divide these two Asian giants. Whether this fragile détente can evolve into a stable partnership remains an open question, one that will shape the region’s geopolitical landscape in the years to come.     The post Bharat-China Relations: A Fragile Thaw Amid Persistent Domestic Skepticism appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[werindialive]

MEA rejects the joint statement of Pakistan and China; calls it ‘unwarranted’

On Thursday, the Ministry of External Affairs said that the mention of Jammu & Kashmir in the joint statement released by Pakistan and China is ‘unwarranted’.

The statement issued by the MEA read, “We have noted unwarranted references to the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir in the joint statement between China and Pakistan of 07 June 2024.” It further stated, “We categorically reject such references. Our position on the issue is consistent and well-known to the concerned parties.”

The ministry reiterated that Jammu & Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh have always been a part of India and will remain so.

“The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain integral and inalienable parts of India. No other country has the locus standi to comment on the same,” MEA pointed out.

The ministry also highlighted the joint statement made by Pakistan & China on June 7th and said that some of the developmental works mentioned in the statement under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor are under India's sovereign territory that is under the forcible or illegal occupancy of Pakistan.

“The same joint statement also mentions activities and projects under the so-called China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), some of which are in India's sovereign territory under forcible and illegal occupation by Pakistan,” it said.

"We resolutely oppose and reject any moves by other countries to reinforce or legitimize Pakistan's illegal occupation of these territories, impinging on India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity," the statement added.

On June 7th, China & Pakistan released a joint statement where Pakistan said that it has updated China on the latest developments in Jammu & Kashmir. “The Chinese side reiterated that the Jammu and Kashmir dispute is left over from history, and should be properly and peacefully resolved in accordance with the UN Charter, relevant UN Security Council resolutions, and bilateral agreements,” the joint statement mentioned.

For more latest news India in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter.

[thefogoflife]

In my effort to break out of my comfort zone, I've allowed myself to get sucked into the toxicity of domestic politics. To combat this, I've produced a nice, ideology free, big-p Political ramble on grand strategy... and jesus was it refreshing.

Article: https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/chinas-endgame-in-ladakh-7056037/lite/

Commentary:

"The US thinks in quarters, while China thinks in epochs"

This is a particularly shrewd move on China's part, because it gives them greater agency and justification to undermine the liberal international system in place...they wouldn't look like a rogue state as much anymore, nor would they look petty in their squabbles with India.

A closer Indo-US relationship is also something that has been an objective of both parties, but has stagnated due to complexities. The US wants India as an ally because India is projected to be the next superpower, and since they're relatively liberal, they would be invaluable for a declining US to be partnered with...similar to the peaceful exchange of influence between Britain and the US. The US has hesitated with this partnership, however, because despite India's potential demographically, technologically, and economically, it has deeply rooted infrastructural and bureaucratic problems that are deemed too steep of an investment...this is similar to Cold War hesitation of embracing Turkey as a NATO ally...a lot of potential strategically, but a lot of glaring flaws that would be a huge gamble.

By forcing this relationship, China would gain a lot of credibility on the world stage by saying it feels threatened by US/western encroachment. This validity would also provide marginally more justification in instigating border disputes, on the false pretense that it's border security. Additionally, the US getting into bed with India would obligate the US to get tangled up in the aforementioned developmental pitfalls India faces, in order to get a return on investment. This would drain a lot of the US's time and resources that is currently being spent on containing Chinese influence/exploitation in the Pacific.

Perhaps most importantly, India being deemed as in bed with the US would justify China in excluding it from the BRI/string of pearls, which would kneecap India's economic/commercial growth potential. Previously, China did not have a legitimate reason to exclude India from the BRI without sullying its reputation as an altruistic trade network meant to benefit the whole world. If this alliance manifests, and the BoP polarizes, China would be able to justify India's exclusion without alarming Western participants, or without incurring justified wrath of the US (as in the US wouldn't be able to make a compelling case to allies for shutting down the BRI).

Considering the BRI is the keystone of China's decades long grand strategy to usurp the liberal hegemonic system, this is a brilliant and hard nosed move by China, I hate to say. By finding enough legitimacy to block India, the BRI is uninhibited until it hits western Europe, and US and it's more staunch allies would be impotent to stop it because of their geographic distance from the actual route.

[theladakh11]

Advisor Narula visits Kargil, holds meeting with CEC LAHDC Kargil Advisor Narula visits Kargil, holds meeting with CEC LAHDC Kargil Kargil 19th July: Advisor Ladakh Umang Narula started his three day tour of Kargil and visited Drass Sub-Division today where he interacted with peoples delegations at Mushkow Valley and adjoining villages. The public delegations projected their demands which mainly included installation of mobile towers in the area, macadamization of link roads,opening up of Mushkow Valley for domestic & foreign tourists. While interacting with the public delegations the Advisor said that UT Adminstration is fully committed to address the developmental needs and grievances of the people living in the villages. https://www.instagram.com/p/CC22AH-sVMO/?igshid=10qqk7vw3r6g8

[theyourclasses]

6 August 2020 Daily Current Affairs & Daily GK Update in English

New Post has been published on https://yourclasses.in/current-affairs-6-august-2020

6 August 2020 Daily Current Affairs & Daily GK Update in English

Current Affairs 6 August 2020 

  Who has been sworn in as Prime Minister of the south American country Republic of Guyana?

(A) Emme Maribel Muñiz

(B) Alex Rodriguez

(C) Mark Anthony Phillips

(D) Cris Judd

(E) Derek Jeter

  Which bank has been selected Infosys Finacle to digitally transform its transaction banking business?

(A) Bahrain Islamic Bank

(B) Khaleeji Commercial Bank

(C) National Bank of Bahrain

(D) Reserve Bank of India

(E) Bank of America

  The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has signed a tripartite MoU with the Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances (DARPG) and whom to support the Ministry of Defence in identifying the cause and nature of grievances and to introduce systemic changes and policy interventions wherever required?

(A) Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

(B) Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

(C) Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

(D) Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati

(E) Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

  The prominent Northern Ireland politician, John Hume passed away recently, was conferred with nobel prize in which year?

(A) 1998

(B) 1999

(C) 1997

(D) 1996

(E) 2000

To provide online education, which Union Territory has launched E-GyanMitra mobile app?

(A) Andaman and Nicobar Islands

(B) Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu

(C) Jammu and Kashmir

(D) Lakshadweep

(E) Ladakh

  William Kirk English, who recently passed away, was a famous for inventing world’s first _____.

(A) Computer Mouse

(B) Computer Keyboard

(C) Computer BIOS

(D) Quad-Core Processor

(E) Digital Speaker

Name the Cipla’s CEO for India’s business who has resigned from his post recently?

(A) Nikhil Chopra

(B) Debashish Mohanty

(C) Atul Wassan

(D) Aakash Chopra

(E) Vijay Bharadwaj

  Under the SwadeshDarshan Scheme, the “Thenzawl Golf Resort” Project has been virtually inaugurated by the Union Minister Shri Prahlad Singh Patel in which state?

(A) Manipur

(B) Nagaland

(C) Meghalaya

(D) Tripura

(E) Mizoram

  The Indian government has contributed how much to India-UN Development Partnership Fund to support developing nations in their developmental priorities across all Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)?

(A) 16.01 million dollar

(B) 13.45 million dollar

(C) 14.21 million dollar

(D) 15.46 million dollar

(E) 12.95 million dollar

  What is the defence manufacturing turnover target of India by 2025 as per “Defence Production & Export Promotion Policy (DPEPP) 2020”?

(A) Rs 1,50,000crore

(B) Rs 1,75,000 crore

(C) Rs 2,25,000 crore

(D) Rs 3,75,000 crore

(E) Rs 5,90,000 crore

  ANSWERS: – 1(C) 2(C) 3(E) 4(A) 5(B) 6(A) 7(A) 8(E) 9(D) 10(B)

[thedailyexcelsior]

Guv, Advisors to review Central projects with BJP delegation today

Sanjeev Pargal

JAMMU, June 26: Governor NN Vohra, his two Advisors and top officers of administration would tomorrow meet a high-level delegation of the BJP at Raj Bhavan in Srinagar to discuss slow pace of developmental works especially the Centrally Sponsored Schemes in Jammu and Ladakh regions, which were described by BJP national president Amit Shah as one of the reasons for withdrawal of…

[thedailyexcelsior]

Union Agri Secy reviews progress of dev schemes in Ladakh

KARGIL: Union Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmer Welfare Secretary, S. K. Patnayak today visited Ladakh to review the progress of various developmental projects and schemes being implemented by Agriculture and allied Departments there.

He was accompanied by Principal Secretary Agriculture Production Department, Sandeep Kumar Nayak and Director Agriculture Kashmir, Syed Altaf Aijaz Andrabi.

The…

[thedailyexcelsior]

Dorjay reviews status of ongoing developmental projects in Leh LEH: The Minister for Cooperatives & Ladakh Affairs, Chering Dorjay, today inspected various developmental works currently under execution in Leh.