#Divorce Application

[ryukisgod]

If a man engages in domestic violence but has never hit one of his bosses, he doesn’t have an anger “management” problem, he can manage his emotions just fine, he just thinks it’s morally okay to hit his wife/gf, and or there won’t be consequences for it

[dont-tell-my-mom-im-here]

Mention Good Omens in college application: succesful 🎀

[idliketobeatree]

now, I genuinely don't want Aziraphale to have to grovel in s3. I think he had to make that decision eventually (even if he wasn't threatened), he just absolutely bombed the execution. but what if. what if at some point when they try to renocile Crowley echoes the "it's not good enough, I want a proper apology" and it takes a few agonizing, tension-cut-with-a-knife seconds of Aziraphale clenching his fists, debating whether it would count, before he snaps like thunder and makes a beeline for Crowley and kisses him straight on the mouth

[doctorwhoisadhd]

hmm thinking about the idea of love songs. i think the idea of what a love song is that we have in our culture is inherently a little bit flawed because we have the idea that any song written about romantic feelings is a love song and im thinking thats not exactly true because there is a difference between "romance" and "love". what i'm saying is not that love is a broader category and applies to things that are not romantic in nature. this is in fact true, but it's not what makes the important distinction here. the true distinction between "romance" and "love" is that romance is a societally defined type of interest in another person, whereas love is, essentially, a promise that you make when you build a relationship.

as such, what i call "love" here might be better defined as "care", as that implies more time and effort, but that's a different suitcase to unpack and largely unimportant to my point here, which is more about the societal conventions of what we call love songs. the point is, relationships can be built with other people, yes, but also animals, places, organizations, ideas, so on and so on, whereas romance requires another person, hence the difference between the ideas of "romance" and "love".

with that in mind, there are two types of songs we in western, english speaking, society call "love songs":

1) songs that are about a person's romantic interest in someone that is either definitively known to be unrequited (existing monogamous relationship, sexuality that doesn't align, etc) or simply not requited (aka romantic interest being unknown); and

2) songs about an existing relationship (keeping in mind my points about relationships not just being with people, but also places, things, etcetera) as is.

(some examples of the latter category: mountaintop by relient k, which defines the relationship in question as non-romantic; or i miss my mum by cavetown, which is - as the title implies - a song about the singer missing their mother.)

now, the thing that makes distinguishing these two difficult is the fact that songs about an existing relationship CAN be about wanting certain aspects of that relationship to change. in these cases, determining that a song is one or the other will hinge either on a) authorial intent or b) whether the song is more about what the singer wants (thereby implying #1) or the lack thereof in that relationship (which would imply #2).

to get back to the subject at hand: the term "love song", as we think of it, is an umbrella term that include both of these two categories, and i think that perhaps it is reductive to do so. with that in mind, i think perhaps it would be more appropriate for "love song" to mean only the latter, whereas the former is a category of its own. WHICH is not to say that the two can't overlap — just that if a song is about a person with whom the singer has no relationship, it cannot be considered a love song due to the fact that it is a song about infatuation, not love.

(another interesting wrinkle this provides is the fact that a song might start out in the first category and, as the writer develops a relationship with a person, might move into the second category as they write more.)

[nemesis-is-my-middle-name]

normal things to say about the society you used to rule over and were beloved by and who are immediately afterwards revealed to be overwhelmingly normal ass people whose only crime is not wanting to be Trapped In The Ground anymore

[chekhovs-harpoon]

larson and the king in yellow

[angrylesbianstereotype]

Does anyone else get self-conscious about that thing they liked that was trending at one point and then when people got tired of it they started pointing out things about it that were problematic which you know fine except instead of just engaging with it on a more critical level people just suddenly acted like it was representative of everything wrong with today’s society and if you liked it still then you were in bed with Big Fascism

[dirt-str1der]

Do you consider any of the non protagonist yakuza girls well writen?

I think none of them had rights

[iysure]

cassunzel AND rhaenicent? damn that’s some deranged taste (i share it too)

it's all about the handmaiden and feudal lord

[velmaharold]

Hello everyone

[milflewis]

I'd ask if u wanna get married when u finally divorce kyle but I'm already married in a polycule

rip we’d be so good together

[familykanoon]

How to File for a Divorce Application in India

Filing for a divorce application in India can seem challenging, but understanding the basic procedures and types of divorce can streamline the process. This concise guide focuses on the essential steps and documents required for filing a divorce petition in India, emphasizing the mutual consent route for its simplicity and directness. We'll also explore the practical aspects of mutual divorce, including application, consent, costs, and why opting for expert legal assistance from Family Kanoon can make the process smoother and more manageable.

How to File for a Divorce Petition in India

Here are the necessary steps for your understanding:

Step 1: Determine the Type of Divorce

●Mutual Consent Divorce: Both parties agree on the terms of their separation, including alimony, child custody, property division, etc.

●Contested Divorce: One party initiates the divorce due to specific grievances, such as cruelty, adultery, desertion, etc.

Step 2: Prepare the Necessary Documents

For a smooth process, gather the following documents:

●Address proofs of both parties

●Marriage certificate and wedding photographs

●Financial statements and professional details of both parties

●Evidence of living separately for the required period

●Income tax statements for the last 3 years

●Details of property and assets held jointly or individually

Step 3: Filing the Divorce Petition

●Mutual Consent Divorce: File a joint petition in the family court, stating that you've been living separately for over a year and have mutually agreed to dissolve the marriage.

●Contested Divorce: The aggrieved party files a petition based on one of the specified grounds, accompanied by all supporting documents.

Step 4: Court Proceedings

●The court scrutinizes the petition and documents. For mutual consent divorces, there's a mandatory waiting period (cooling-off period) that can sometimes be waived.

●Both parties must appear in court to record statements under oath.

●If reconciliation attempts fail, the court moves forward with the divorce proceedings.

Step 5: Decree of Divorce

●Upon satisfying all legal requirements and after the waiting period, the court may pass the decree of divorce, legally dissolving the marriage.

Considerations for Mutual Consent Divorce

●Mutual Divorce Application: Simplifies the divorce process, requiring cooperation from both spouses.

●Consent Divorce: Indicates both parties agree on major issues, making legal proceedings smoother.

●Mutual Divorce Cost: Typically lower than contested divorces due to fewer legal complexities and shorter time frames.

Why Choose Family Kanoon?

Going through a divorce in India, especially filing a petition and understanding the nuances of mutual consent divorces, demands professional guidance. Family Kanoon offers expert legal services tailored to your specific needs. With a focus on mutual consent divorce, they ensure:

●A clear understanding of mutual divorce application processes

●Efficient handling of consent divorce agreements

●Transparent breakdown of mutual divorce costs

●Compassionate and confidential support throughout your legal journey

Conclusion

Filing for a divorce petition in India, particularly under mutual consent, offers a straightforward path to legally end a marriage with dignity and respect for both parties. It's crucial to approach the process with a clear understanding and the right legal support. For those considering this path, Family Kanoon stands ready to provide expert advice and assistance, ensuring that your mutual divorce is handled with the care and efficiency it deserves.

[lemonbrole]

Oh shit i loooove delaying the inevitable!!!

[btllawpc]

Preparing and Filing the Uncontested Divorce Application

Embark on your journey towards an uncontested divorce in Ontario with our comprehensive step-by-step guide! In this video, we'll walk you through the process from start to finish, ensuring a smooth and hassle-free application experience.

Scene by scene, we'll cover:

📜 Step 1: Obtaining Forms (Form 8A) Learn where to download Form 8A: Application (Divorce) and gather essential documents like your marriage certificate and financial statements.

🏛️ Step 2: Filing in the Correct Court Discover which court in Ontario to file your application at, based on your jurisdiction. We'll also provide insights into the necessary court fees.

💌 Step 3: Serving the Application Understand the legal requirement of serving the application to your spouse, along with tips on completing a Form 6B: Affidavit of Service as proof.

📃 Service Rules Learn the specific rules for serving documents and explore options like using a friend, family member, or professional process server.

Looking for expert guidance throughout your uncontested divorce journey? Contact our skilled family lawyer in Toronto at (647) 254-0909, or visit our website at https://separationagreementontario.ca/uncontested-divorce/

[liberaljane]

Women's Not So Distant History

This #WomensHistoryMonth, let's not forget how many of our rights were only won in recent decades, and weren’t acquired by asking nicely and waiting. We need to fight for our rights. Here's are a few examples:

📍 Before 1974's Fair Credit Opportunity Act made it illegal for financial institutions to discriminate against applicants' gender, banks could refuse women a credit card. Women won the right to open a bank account in the 1960s, but many banks still refused without a husband’s signature. This allowed men to continue to have control over women’s bank accounts. Unmarried women were often refused service by financial institutions entirely.

📍 Before 1977, sexual harassment was not considered a legal offense. That changed when a woman brought her boss to court after she refused his sexual advances and was fired. The court stated that her termination violated the 1974 Civil Rights Act, which made employment discrimination illegal.⚖️

📍 In 1969, California became the first state to pass legislation to allow no-fault divorce. Before then, divorce could only be obtained if a woman could prove that her husband had committed serious faults such as adultery. 💍By 1977, nine states had adopted no-fault divorce laws, and by late 1983, every state had but two. The last, New York, adopted a law in 2010.

📍In 1967, Kathrine Switzer, entered the Boston Marathon under the name "K.V. Switzer." At the time, the Amateur Athletics Union didn't allow women. Once discovered, staff tried to remove Switzer from the race, but she finished. AAU did not formally accept women until fall 1971.

📍 In 1972, Lillian Garland, a receptionist at a California bank, went on unpaid leave to have a baby and when she returned, her position was filled. Her lawsuit led to 1978's Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which found that discriminating against pregnant people is unlawful

📍 It wasn’t until 2016 that gay marriage was legal in all 50 states. Previously, laws varied by state, and while many states allowed for civil unions for same-sex couples, it created a separate but equal standard. In 2008, California was the first state to achieve marriage equality, only to reverse that right following a ballot initiative later that year. 

📍In 2018, Utah and Idaho were the last two states that lacked clear legislation protecting chest or breast feeding parents from obscenity laws. At the time, an Idaho congressman complained women would, "whip it out and do it anywhere,"

📍 In 1973, the Supreme Court affirmed the right to safe legal abortion in Roe v. Wade. At the time of the decision, nearly all states outlawed abortion with few exceptions. In 1965, illegal abortions made up one-sixth of all pregnancy- and childbirth-related deaths. Unfortunately after years of abortion restrictions and bans, the Supreme Court overturned Roe in 2022. Since then, 14 states have fully banned care, and another 7 severely restrict it – leaving most of the south and midwest without access. 

📍 Before 1973, women were not able to serve on a jury in all 50 states. However, this varied by state: Utah was the first state to allow women to serve jury duty in 1898. Though, by 1927, only 19 states allowed women to serve jury duty. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 gave women the right to serve on federal juries, though it wasn't until 1973 that all 50 states passed similar legislation

📍 Before 1988, women were unable to get a business loan on their own. The Women's Business Ownership Act of 1988 allowed women to get loans without a male co-signer and removed other barriers to women in business. The number of women-owned businesses increased by 31 times in the last four decades. 

Free download

📍 Before 1965, married women had no right to birth control. In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court ruled that banning the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy.

📍 Before 1967, interracial couples didn’t have the right to marry. In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court found that anti-miscegenation laws were unconstitutional. In 2000, Alabama was the last State to remove its anti-miscegenation laws from the books.

📍 Before 1972, unmarried women didn’t have the right to birth control. While married couples gained the right in 1967, it wasn’t until Eisenstadt v. Baird seven years later, that the Supreme Court affirmed the right to contraception for unmarried people.

📍 In 1974, the last “Ugly Laws” were repealed in Chicago. “Ugly Laws” allowed the police to arrest and jail people with visible disabilities for being seen in public. People charged with ugly laws were either charged a fine or held in jail. ‘Ugly Laws’ were a part of the late 19th century Victorian Era poor laws. 

📍 In 1976, Hawaii was the last state to lift requirements that a woman take her husband’s last name.  If a woman didn’t take her husband’s last name, employers could refuse to issue her payroll and she could be barred from voting. 

📍 It wasn’t until 1993 that marital assault became a crime in all 50 states. Historically, intercourse within marriage was regarded as a “right” of spouses. Before 1974, in all fifty U.S. states, men had legal immunity for assaults their wives. Oklahoma and North Carolina were the last to change the law in 1993.

📍  In 1990, the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) – most comprehensive disability rights legislation in U.S. history – was passed. The ADA protected disabled people from employment discrimination. Previously, an employer could refuse to hire someone just because of their disability.

📍 Before 1993, women weren’t allowed to wear pants on the Senate floor. That changed when Sen. Moseley Braun (D-IL), & Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) wore trousers - shocking the male-dominated Senate. Their fashion statement ultimately led to the dress code being clarified to allow women to wear pants. 

📍 Emergency contraception (Plan B) wasn't approved by the FDA until 1998. While many can get emergency contraception at their local drugstore, back then it required a prescription. In 2013, the FDA removed age limits & allowed retailers to stock it directly on the shelf (although many don’t).

📍  In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Supreme Court ruled that anti-cohabitation laws were unconstitutional. Sometimes referred to as the ‘'Living in Sin' statute, anti-cohabitation laws criminalize living with a partner if the couple is unmarried. Today, Mississippi still has laws on its books against cohabitation. 

[caveatin]

Empowering Your Divorce Journey: Unraveling the Dynamics of Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi/NCR and the Significance of Supreme Court Caveats

Introduction:

In the complex landscape of divorce proceedings, mutual consent divorce stands out as a relatively amicable and streamlined process. Couples in Delhi/NCR seeking to part ways through mutual consent have a simplified legal route at their disposal. However, it is essential to be aware of certain nuances, particularly when it comes to safeguarding one's interests through a caveat application in the Supreme Court.

Mutual Consent Divorce:

Mutual consent divorce is a legal process where both parties agree to end their marriage on mutually acceptable terms. In Delhi/NCR, this method offers a quicker and less adversarial alternative to traditional divorce proceedings. The key element is the joint petition filed by the spouses, stating their intention to dissolve the marriage, and outlining mutually agreed-upon terms such as alimony, child custody, and property division.

Caveat Application in the Supreme Court:

While Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi/NCRis generally a smoother process, unforeseen circumstances may arise, prompting the need for caution. This is where a caveat application in the Supreme Court comes into play. A caveat is a legal notice filed by an interested party to prevent an action from being taken without giving that party an opportunity to be heard. In the context of mutual consent divorce, a caveat application can be lodged to safeguard one's interests and prevent any unilateral decisions.

Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi/NCR

Why Consider a Caveat Application?

Protecting Interests: Filing a caveat application supreme courtensures that both parties have an equal opportunity to present their case. This is crucial in preventing any potential exploitation or imbalance in the divorce proceedings.

Preventing Unilateral Decisions: In some cases, one party may attempt to take advantage of the other's goodwill during the mutual consent process. A caveat application acts as a safeguard against any unilateral decisions that may not be in the best interest of both parties.

Ensuring Fairness: By filing a caveat application supreme court, individuals can ensure that the divorce process remains fair and transparent. This is particularly important when dealing with matters such as alimony, child custody, and property division.

Conclusion:

Navigating the intricacies of Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi/NCR requires a balanced approach that prioritizes fairness and protection of individual interests. While the process is generally smoother than other divorce procedures, the option of filing a caveat application in the Supreme Court adds an extra layer of security for those seeking a mutually agreeable end to their marriage. As with any legal process, it is advisable to seek professional guidance to ensure a smooth and fair resolution for all parties involved.