#EmployeeData
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Transform Your HR Processes with a Modern Employee Records Management System | Wepsol
Wepsol is an employee records management system that offers a comprehensive solution for efficiently managing employee records and information within an organization. They ensure data security and privacy compliance, providing a reliable and organized solution for managing employee records.
#EmployeeManagement#HRInnovation#DigitalHR#HRSolutions#EmployeeData#HRCompliance#DataSecurity#EmployeeRecords#ERM#EmployeeRecordmanagement
0 notes
Link
https://bit.ly/3nTKrPx - 馃敀 The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) is currently investigating a significant data breach. It's believed that personal data from around 237,000 current and former federal employees may have been compromised. This breach is limited to specific administrative systems within the USDOT, particularly those processing transit benefits for employees. Immediate action was taken with a suspension of access to the relevant systems to allow a comprehensive investigation. #DataBreach #USDOT #CyberSecurity 馃捇 The breached system, known for managing TRANServe transit benefits, reimburses government employees for certain commuting expenses. Despite the breach, USDOT reassures the public that the incident hasn't impacted any transportation safety systems. It remains unclear whether the exposed personal information has been misused for criminal activities. #CyberAttack #TRANServe #Government 馃摟 USDOT promptly notified Congress about the breach, explaining that its initial investigation has isolated the breach to certain systems used for administrative functions. The total impact involves 114,000 current and 123,000 former employees, with each potentially having a maximum benefit allowance of $280 per month for mass transit commuting costs. #DataPrivacy #Congress #EmployeeData 馃攷 While the identity of the responsible party remains unknown, USDOT has committed to thoroughly investigate the incident. Access to the transit benefit system has been frozen until it's fully secured and restored. As cyber threats to federal agencies persist, this incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of robust cyber defense systems. #CyberThreat #Investigation #DataProtection 馃摪 Federal agencies have repeatedly been the target of hackers. Notably, breaches at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in 2014 and 2015 impacted over 22 million people, compromising sensitive data of 4.2 million current and federal employees, including fingerprint data of 5.6 million individuals. In 2021, suspected Russian hackers breached nine federal agencies, using SolarWinds and Microsoft software to infiltrate unclassified Justice Department networks.
#DataBreach#USDOT#CyberSecurity#CyberAttack#TRANServe#Government#DataPrivacy#Congress#EmployeeData#CyberThreat#Investigation#DataProtection#OPM#SolarWinds#CyberCrime
0 notes
Link
Ultimatix Payroll TimeSheet Software offers a simple and easy to use interface with multiple customizable features to meet the needs of your enterprise as closely as possible. ..#Ultimax #OrangeTechnolab #UltimatixPayroll #PayrollSolutions #PayrollSoftware #PayrollSystems #Payrolling #HRSoftware #HRMS #DigitalHRMS #InformationManagement #EmployeeData #EmployeeManagement #EmployeeTracking #InformationSecurity #PayrollManagement #PayrollHRSoftware # PayrollHRSoftware #PayrollOutsourcing
#Ultimax#OrangeTechnolab#UltimatixPayroll#PayrollSolutions#PayrollSoftware#HRSoftware#HRMS#InformationManagement#EmployeeData#EmployeeManagement#EmployeeTracking#InformationSecurity#PayrollManagement#PayrollHRSoftware#payrolloutsourcing#workfromhomebusiness#workfromhomeonline
0 notes
Photo

Are you planning to develop an on-demand app like Pagarbook? So first you need to understand the features, cost, and elements that you must have in your application with this blog:- https://blog.techpathway.com/how-much-does-it-cost-to-develop-an-app-like-pagarbook/
For more information:- https://www.techpathway.com/
0 notes
Text
The Impact of Non-Employee Drug Testing onanked Rollover Plans
Due to the uncertainty that exists with unsuccessful drug testing, employers are finding it difficult to determine the appropriate course of action to adopt to their employees. However, uncertainty is not the cause of the problems. Instead, the problems stem from the fact that there is simply no consistent data around what the impacts will be should an employee be tested. Additionally, other employers are introducing their own policies which are a direct challenge to those of us that comply with the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
What is the proper response to such a situation? Well, it certainly is to err on the side of caution. Asking the employee to submit to a drug test (if it is undertaken by a reputable company), would allow for the employee to submit to their employer's prescription. This is of course, the responsible thing to do. However, if a drug test is not the 'desired' outcome, then the employer has the responsibility to mitigate the risk by allow the employee to undergo a pre-employment drug screening (otherwise known as a potency screening).
Note: Before you consider challenging such a position, make sure that you have all of the required information pertaining to the employee in question. If the company you are considering has provided you with all of the necessary documents, then you should not attempt to challenge the employee for testing without providing all of the necessary information to do so.
What if the employee claims that the supply of the drug was provided voluntarily and was not part of the employer's duty? The question of causation turns to whether or not the individual was expendable. In other words, was the employeeData in Conditions of another employee's employment or was the employee's data eliminated due to another employee's conduct? If the answer to either of these questions was yes, then the employee may not have a violation on their record to submit to a drug test.
Note: If you are questioning an employee's right to disclosure of past, relevant information, you must be careful that the company you hire has provided the proper channel for such information to be revealed. In addition, you must ascertain the reason the information was concealable. Was this done solely for the sake of maintaining the organization's reputation, or were there actual extenuating circumstances that resulted in an employee's behavior being exemplary?
Sadly, some employees do not comprehend the concept of accountability and responsibility, and they too easily complain about extenuating circumstances without thinking through the implications. More often than not, Extenuating Circumstances are personal and can include stress at work, relationships with co-workers, an inappropriate clearance through occupational medicine, or simply over-work.
It is the responsibility of every employer to detect and contain extenuating circumstances through both internal and external resources. When employees fail to disclose appropriate data, the pattern and reason for negative employee behavior should be uncovered. Then, the appropriate response can be undertaken to remedy the carries-forward problem.
"In every workplace, drug abuse is a threat to the health and productivity of those who work there...Every workplace has cultures which treat employees who use drugs as if they were evil or abnormal simply because of their condition." interviewingees from a 2006 Human Resource Council on Drug Issues Panel.
In every workplace, drug abuse is a threat to the health and productivity of those who work there...Every workplace has cultures which treat employees who use drugs as if they were evil or abnormal simply because of their condition. All workplaces should have a zero tolerance for any use of drugs by employees. If it is too severe, the organization may expel the offending employee.
0 notes
Text
Regu艂a jednej odpowiedzialno艣ci (SRP)
Z pozoru prosta zasada, je艣li kto艣 s艂yszy has艂o SOLID to jednym tchem m贸wi "Single responsibility principle" czyli zasada jednej odpowiedzialno艣ci. Zazwyczaj programistom wydaje si臋, 偶e w tej zasadzie, chodzi o to, 偶e jedna klasa mo偶e wykonywa膰 tylko jedno zadanie. Zdarzy艂o mi si臋 s艂ysze膰 nawet opinie, 偶e skoro wykonujemy jakie艣 dzia艂anie w p臋tli, to jest z艂amanie tej zasady. Gdy偶 robimy dwie rzeczy, iterujemy po elementach i wykonujemy na nich jakie艣 rzeczy. Niezrozumienie wi臋c czym jest SRP jest spore. Dlatego chcia艂bym po艣wi臋ci膰 tej zasadzie ca艂y wpis.
Oczywi艣cie istnieje zasada, kt贸ra m贸wi, 偶e ka偶da metoda powinna robi膰 dok艂adnie jedn膮 rzecz. Jest to zasada, z kt贸rej korzystamy, dziel膮c wi臋ksz膮 funkcj臋 na mniejsze, by zwi臋kszy膰 jej czytelno艣膰. Nie jest to jednak 偶adna z zasad SOLID ani ta, na kt贸rej chcia艂bym si臋 teraz skupi膰.
Zacznijmy od tego, 偶e zasady SOLID pierwotnie dotyczy艂y zasad programowania obiektowego, ale p贸藕niej z powodzeniem zosta艂y prze艂o偶one r贸wnie偶 na zasady dotycz膮ce architektury aplikacji. Robert C. Martin (ojciec zasad SOLID) zdefiniowa艂 regu艂臋 SRP jako:
Ka偶dy modu艂 powinien mie膰 jedn膮 i tylko jedn膮 przyczyn臋 zmian.
I zapewne wiele os贸b poprzez do艣膰 lu藕n膮 interpretacj臋 tych s艂贸w 藕le r贸wnie偶 rozumiej膮 sam膮 zasad臋 jednej odpowiedzialno艣ci. Zauwa偶aj膮c, 偶e przyczyn膮 zmian s膮 konkretni u偶ytkownicy (aktorzy). Ka偶de oprogramowanie tworzone jest przecie偶 w艂a艣nie dla nich. Wi臋c ostateczna wersja regu艂y SRP brzmi:
Ka偶dy modu艂 powinien odpowiada膰 przed jednym i tylko jednym aktorem.
Jako modu艂 w zale偶no艣ci od 艣rodowiska i j臋zyka programowania mo偶emy mie膰 na my艣li jeden plik kodu, klas臋 lub jaki艣 sp贸jny zbi贸r funkcji i struktur danych. I s艂owo sp贸jny jest w tym przypadku kluczowe. To ono spaja w艂a艣nie kod zwi膮zany z jednym aktorem. Spr贸buj臋 przedstawi膰 to na przyk艂adach:
Przyk艂ad
Za艂贸偶my, 偶e mamy nast臋puj膮c膮 klas臋:
Ka偶da metoda dotyczy innego aktora. calculatePay() dotyczy pracownika dzia艂u ksi臋gowo艣ci. Specyfikacja jej dzia艂ania zosta艂a zdefiniowana przez kierownika tego dzia艂u. reportHours() zosta艂a przygotowana przez dzia艂 kadr kt贸ry ma swoje wymagania odno艣nie jej dzia艂ania. Specyfikacja metody save() zosta艂a przygotowana przez lidera technicznego projektu.
Umieszczaj膮c kod tych trzech funkcji w jendnej klasie wi膮偶e ze sob膮 odpowiedzialno艣膰 trzech aktor贸w. Za艂贸偶my, 偶e programi艣ci nie chc膮c duplikowa膰 kodu w metodach calculatePay() i reportHours() u偶yli tego samego algorytmu do wyliczania godzin pracy wydzielonego w osobnej metodzie regularHour(). Teraz okazuje si臋, 偶e dzia艂 ksi臋gowo艣ci chc zmian w sposobie wyliczania godzin b臋d膮cych podstaw膮 wyliczenia wyp艂aty. Oczywi艣cie dzia艂 kadr potrzebuje raportu w zupe艂nie innym celu i 偶adnych zmian nie potrzebuj膮. Programista, kt贸ry otrzyma艂 zadanie wprowadzenia zmian, znajduj臋 idealnie pasuj膮c膮 do zadania funkcj臋 regularHour(). Zmiany s膮 sumiennie testowane, dzia艂 ksi臋gowo艣ci potwierdza jej poprawno艣膰. Wszystko 艣wietnie wi臋c kod trafia na produkcj臋. Oczywi艣cie dzia艂 kadr nie wie nic o zmianach, a problem mo偶e zosta膰 odkryty do艣膰 p贸藕no. Do tego czasu koszta zwi膮zane z wygenerowanym b艂臋dem mog膮 narosn膮膰. Takie problemy wynikaj膮 z tego, 偶e kod zale偶ny od r贸偶nych aktor贸w zosta艂 umieszczony zbyt blisko siebie.
Jest jeszcze Inny problem, kt贸ry mo偶e si臋 pojawi膰 z powodu naruszenia zasady SRP. Pliki zawieraj膮ce kod zale偶ny od wielu aktor贸w cz臋sto nara偶ony jest na konflikty podczas mergowania kodu. Wystarczy, 偶e dwaj aktorzy wystosuj膮 potrzeb臋 zmian. Problem ro艣nie, gdy nad jednym kodem w kontek艣cie r贸偶nych aktor贸w pracuj膮 r贸偶ne zespo艂y. W takiej sytuacji dw贸ch programist贸w z dw贸ch r贸偶nych zespo艂贸w wprowadza zmiany, kt贸re mog膮 ze sob膮 kolidowa膰. Przyk艂ad tylko klasy Employee dotyczy trzech aktor贸w. Wi臋c potrzeba zmian mo偶e zosta膰 zg艂oszona na potrzeby trzech r贸偶nych dzia艂贸w i na te trzy dzia艂y zmiany mog膮 oddzia艂ywa膰. Ile teraz podobnych przyk艂ad贸w mo偶e si臋 pojawi膰 w naszej aplikacji? Ile potencjalnych problem贸w mo偶e si臋 pojawi膰?
Problem贸w zwi膮zanych z przenikaniem si臋 kodu dotycz膮cego wielu aktor贸w jest wi臋cej. My艣l臋, 偶e ka偶dy z nas m贸g艂by z powodzeniem przytoczy膰 sporo podobnych przyk艂ad贸w napotkanych w swojej karierze.
Jak temu zaradzi膰?
Rozwi膮za艅 jest wiele. Ka偶de z nich zak艂ada przeniesienie kodu do osobnych plik贸w. W zale偶no艣ci od architektury mo偶e wygl膮da膰 to nieco inaczej. Mog膮 by膰 to osobne mikro serwisy obs艂uguj膮ce zadania dotycz膮ce osobnych konteksty. Mog膮 by膰 to te偶 osobne modu艂y. Najprostszym rozwi膮zaniem jest wydzielenie kodu dotycz膮cego ka偶dego aktora do osobnych klas. 呕adna z tych klas nie powinna wiedzie膰 nic o sobie, ale mog膮 mi臋dzy sob膮 wsp贸艂dzieli膰 dost臋p do klasy EmployeeData kt贸ry odpowiada jedynie za przechowywanie danych. Dzi臋ki takiemu podzia艂owi uchronimy si臋 od problem贸w wynikaj膮cych ze zmian spowodowanych w r贸偶nych kontekstach oraz nieoczywistych powi膮za艅 mi臋dzy nimi.
Architektura aplikacji jest bardzo istotna i nie warto w niej stosowa膰 skrut贸w. Z pozoru ma艂a oszcz臋dno艣膰 czasu przy tworzeniu jakiej艣 funkcjonalno艣ci mo偶e w przysz艂o艣ci przysporzy膰 nam wiele problem贸w a te z kolei sporo koszt贸w dla naszych zleceniodawc贸w.
殴r贸d艂a
Robert C. Martin "Czysta architektura: Struktura i design oprogramowania Przewodnik dla profesjonalist贸w"
0 notes
Text
Code I Ran Today: 08/16/2017
See It Live and Run It Yourself: Code I Ran Today: 08/16/2017
Skills Used: for loop, array, function, object, array of arrays to array of objects
Background: Took me 3 hours! 聽I had some else鈥檚 answer available, but did not want to cheat. 聽I FORCED myself to get this one. 聽I think I even started hallucinating a bit...but I told myself not to quit and to get it. 聽And I did.
Code:聽
function transformEmployeeData(employeeData) {
聽var array = []; 聽for (var i = 0; i < employeeData.length; i++) { 聽var obj= {}; 聽 聽for(var j = 0; j < employeeData[0].length; j++) {
聽 聽 聽obj[employeeData[i][j][0]] = employeeData[i][j][1];
聽 聽} 聽 聽 聽 聽 聽 聽 聽array.push(obj); 聽} 聽
聽 聽return array;
}
transformEmployeeData([ 聽 聽[ 聽 聽 聽 聽['firstName1', 'Joe'], ['lastName1', 'Blow'], ['age1', 42], ['role1', 'clerk'] 聽 聽], 聽 聽[ 聽 聽 聽 聽['firstName2', 'Mary'], ['lastName2', 'Jenkins'], ['age2', 36], ['role2', 'manager'] 聽 聽] ]);
0 notes
Photo

Can a cloud based payroll be more economically beneficial than physically for a business? Share your thoughts with us in comments below. . Visit our website: https://payrollsoftwareco.in/ . #Ultimatix #OrangeTechnolab #UltimatixPayroll #PayrollSolutions #PayrollSoftware #PayrollSystems #Payrolling #HRSoftware #HRMS #DigitalHRMS #InformationManagement #EmployeeData #EmployeeManagement #EmployeeTracking #InformationSecurity #PayrollManagement #PayrollHRSoftware #AttendanceManagement #PayrollOutsourcing #HRTechnology #HRCommunity #WFH #WFHLife #WFHTips #NoTouchTools #ContactLess See less
#OrangeTechnolab#UltimatixPayroll#PayrollSolutions#PayrollSoftware#payrollsystems#payrolling#HRSoftware#HRMS#digitalhrms#EmployeeManagement#EmployeeTracking#PayrollManagement#PayrollHRSoftware#AttendanceManagement#payrolloutsourcing#payroll software
0 notes
Photo

Why still are you sharing salary slips and form 16 to employees? Yes, it鈥檚 a task done by the HR team daily. Replace your traditional old edge HR solution software with new edge ULTIMATIX PAYROLL and HRMS SOLUTION. The employee can directly download their payslip and form 16 from their login.
Visit our website: https://payrollsoftwareco.in/
#Ultimatix #OrangeTechnolab #UltimatixPayroll #PayrollSolutions #PayrollSoftware #PayrollSystems #Payrolling #HRSoftware #HRMS #DigitalHRMS #InformationManagement #EmployeeData #EmployeeManagement #EmployeeTracking #PayrollManagement #PayrollHRSoftware #AttendanceManagement #PayrollOutsourcing #HRTechnology #HRCommunity #WFH #WFHLife #WFHTips #NoTouchTools #ContactLess
#UltimatixPayroll#ultimatix#OrangeTechnolab#PayrollSoftware#payrollsystems#payrolling#HRSoftware#HRMS#digitalhrms#InformationManagement#EmployeeManagement#PayrollManagement#PayrollHRSoftware#AttendanceManagement#payrolloutsourcing#hrtechnology#hrcommunity#wfh
0 notes