#Face Anti Aging Treatment Flushing Ny

[journalingthisjourney]

Is Cocaine Making a Comeback Amidst the Opiate Crisis?

Right now the opiate crisis is getting all of the press, and rightfully so–opiate overdoses are now the leading cause of death in this country for people under the age of 50. Shocking and upsetting as that may be, other substances are still a viable threat.

The NY Times says that “…opioids are not America’s only significant drug problem. Among illicit drugs, cocaine is the No. 2 killer and claims the lives of more African-Americans than heroin does. ”

You may be wondering exactly how the two substances differ. Cocaine is a stimulant and it essentially opens a doorway in the brain that allows dopamine to become more efficient. Opiates actually have molecules that target the opiate receptors in the brain in order to produce euphoria.

When the opiate molecules flood the brain they cause it to care less about the pain signals that the brain may be receiving from the body. The pain is still there and the pain signals are still being sent, but the opiate drug is like a rag in a ringing alarm clock–it simply dampens the brain’s awareness of that pain.

The problem with the current drug crisis is that it is a very complicated and expensive problem to try to fix. There is no easy answer, and there is no inexpensive answer. Furthermore, even if we throw a great deal of money at the problem it will not necessarily solve it or even make much of an impact. In other words, we need to do the right things and we also need to be willing to invest heavily in doing those things well.

So what are those solutions, and what do they look like? For one thing, we can attempt to step up our prevention efforts, though no one is really sure if that will have the kind of downstream effect that we are hoping for. Traditionally, prevention efforts of the past have not done much to prevent the current crisis, so it is questionable if doubling down on prevention would have the effect that we want. But it might be better than not trying at all.

Second, we could pour more money and funding into treatment programs for existing addicts. So one of the things that is sorely needed in the battle against addiction is a much more intense focus on inpatient treatment.

While there are a variety of possible options for a struggling drug addict–ranging from AA meetings to IOP to counseling to sober living to inpatient rehab–it could be argued that the most effective starting point for a struggling addict is to go to a 28 day inpatient program.

One of the problems with this is that treatment of that kind is not cheap, and most addicts are not exactly flush with cash, resources, and great health insurance. Instead, the typical addict may have lost all of their money as well as the job that was needed to get them decent health insurance that would have possibly covered inpatient treatment. But because they tend to lose their job as a result of their addiction, the typical addict often has no money or health insurance to be able to get the help that they need.

Some people argue against this solution because the success rate of traditional treatment programs is typically fairly low. If you take 100 addicts and put them through a 28 day inpatient program, how many of them are still clean and sober a year later? Unfortunately, the answer seems to be “very few of them,” with statistics generally reporting around 20 percent “making it” at best. However, no matter what the actual success rate is, we know that it is higher than zero, and essentially zero is what we are getting when we do not attempt any sort of solution at all.

One of the other problems with inpatient treatment as the solution has to do with the stigma that is attached to it. So part of the long term solution, if that solution is to include a push for more treatment services, is going to have to include some sort of effort to reduce the perceived stigma that our society has towards the treatment process. If we want to push more and more people to get help then we may need to rearrange how we view treatment in general, and what our overall opinions are of.

Another shift that may be happening over the next few years may come in the form of MAT, or “medication assisted treatment.” This is what you used to know as the “methadone maintenance program” but today is becoming more and more sophisticated as we develop new and safer drugs to treat addiction with. For example, in the world of opiate abuse we are now using Suboxone as a safer and less addictive alternative to methadone. Also, there are new medications on the horizon that can be used to reduce cravings for cocaine, and there are already a few medications that exist to treat alcoholism. While it may not be a total solution just yet, the future of drug and alcohol addiction treatment may very well be a new wave of medications that reduce cravings and block the euphoric effects of recreational drugs. These new medications may even be semi permanent implants that, once taken, simply do their job to help us regulate our addictions. Nobody knows for sure how this medical technology will evolve or to what extent it will impact the face of recovery, but it could have quite a large impact based on the last few years of research.

The reason that MAT may become the focal point of treatment is based on the generational differences that we are seeing unfold. The “old way” of treatment involved going to rehab and following that up with devout AA attendance, sponsorship, reading literature, and step work. Are younger people today going to embrace the path of “hard work in recovery” over something as easy as getting an “anti craving implant?” It seems unlikely. Of course, what we really care about is the fact that we need a treatment plan that works and actually helps people to reduce the overall damages and cost to society. For every addict we can “save” today, we prevent a considerable amount of cost and damages in the future.

The post Is Cocaine Making a Comeback Amidst the Opiate Crisis? appeared first on Spiritual River Addiction Help.

[bobbiejwray]

Is Cocaine Making a Comeback Amidst the Opiate Crisis?

Right now the opiate crisis is getting all of the press, and rightfully so–opiate overdoses are now the leading cause of death in this country for people under the age of 50. Shocking and upsetting as that may be, other substances are still a viable threat.

The NY Times says that “…opioids are not America’s only significant drug problem. Among illicit drugs, cocaine is the No. 2 killer and claims the lives of more African-Americans than heroin does. ”

You may be wondering exactly how the two substances differ. Cocaine is a stimulant and it essentially opens a doorway in the brain that allows dopamine to become more efficient. Opiates actually have molecules that target the opiate receptors in the brain in order to produce euphoria.

When the opiate molecules flood the brain they cause it to care less about the pain signals that the brain may be receiving from the body. The pain is still there and the pain signals are still being sent, but the opiate drug is like a rag in a ringing alarm clock–it simply dampens the brain’s awareness of that pain.

The problem with the current drug crisis is that it is a very complicated and expensive problem to try to fix. There is no easy answer, and there is no inexpensive answer. Furthermore, even if we throw a great deal of money at the problem it will not necessarily solve it or even make much of an impact. In other words, we need to do the right things and we also need to be willing to invest heavily in doing those things well.

So what are those solutions, and what do they look like? For one thing, we can attempt to step up our prevention efforts, though no one is really sure if that will have the kind of downstream effect that we are hoping for. Traditionally, prevention efforts of the past have not done much to prevent the current crisis, so it is questionable if doubling down on prevention would have the effect that we want. But it might be better than not trying at all.

Second, we could pour more money and funding into treatment programs for existing addicts. So one of the things that is sorely needed in the battle against addiction is a much more intense focus on inpatient treatment.

While there are a variety of possible options for a struggling drug addict–ranging from AA meetings to IOP to counseling to sober living to inpatient rehab–it could be argued that the most effective starting point for a struggling addict is to go to a 28 day inpatient program.

One of the problems with this is that treatment of that kind is not cheap, and most addicts are not exactly flush with cash, resources, and great health insurance. Instead, the typical addict may have lost all of their money as well as the job that was needed to get them decent health insurance that would have possibly covered inpatient treatment. But because they tend to lose their job as a result of their addiction, the typical addict often has no money or health insurance to be able to get the help that they need.

Some people argue against this solution because the success rate of traditional treatment programs is typically fairly low. If you take 100 addicts and put them through a 28 day inpatient program, how many of them are still clean and sober a year later? Unfortunately, the answer seems to be “very few of them,” with statistics generally reporting around 20 percent “making it” at best. However, no matter what the actual success rate is, we know that it is higher than zero, and essentially zero is what we are getting when we do not attempt any sort of solution at all.

One of the other problems with inpatient treatment as the solution has to do with the stigma that is attached to it. So part of the long term solution, if that solution is to include a push for more treatment services, is going to have to include some sort of effort to reduce the perceived stigma that our society has towards the treatment process. If we want to push more and more people to get help then we may need to rearrange how we view treatment in general, and what our overall opinions are of.

Another shift that may be happening over the next few years may come in the form of MAT, or “medication assisted treatment.” This is what you used to know as the “methadone maintenance program” but today is becoming more and more sophisticated as we develop new and safer drugs to treat addiction with. For example, in the world of opiate abuse we are now using Suboxone as a safer and less addictive alternative to methadone. Also, there are new medications on the horizon that can be used to reduce cravings for cocaine, and there are already a few medications that exist to treat alcoholism. While it may not be a total solution just yet, the future of drug and alcohol addiction treatment may very well be a new wave of medications that reduce cravings and block the euphoric effects of recreational drugs. These new medications may even be semi permanent implants that, once taken, simply do their job to help us regulate our addictions. Nobody knows for sure how this medical technology will evolve or to what extent it will impact the face of recovery, but it could have quite a large impact based on the last few years of research.

The reason that MAT may become the focal point of treatment is based on the generational differences that we are seeing unfold. The “old way” of treatment involved going to rehab and following that up with devout AA attendance, sponsorship, reading literature, and step work. Are younger people today going to embrace the path of “hard work in recovery” over something as easy as getting an “anti craving implant?” It seems unlikely. Of course, what we really care about is the fact that we need a treatment plan that works and actually helps people to reduce the overall damages and cost to society. For every addict we can “save” today, we prevent a considerable amount of cost and damages in the future.

The post Is Cocaine Making a Comeback Amidst the Opiate Crisis? appeared first on Spiritual River Addiction Help.

from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8241842 https://ift.tt/2qZJJ2t

[alexdmorgan30]

Is Cocaine Making a Comeback Amidst the Opiate Crisis?

Right now the opiate crisis is getting all of the press, and rightfully so–opiate overdoses are now the leading cause of death in this country for people under the age of 50. Shocking and upsetting as that may be, other substances are still a viable threat.

The NY Times says that “…opioids are not America’s only significant drug problem. Among illicit drugs, cocaine is the No. 2 killer and claims the lives of more African-Americans than heroin does. ”

You may be wondering exactly how the two substances differ. Cocaine is a stimulant and it essentially opens a doorway in the brain that allows dopamine to become more efficient. Opiates actually have molecules that target the opiate receptors in the brain in order to produce euphoria.

When the opiate molecules flood the brain they cause it to care less about the pain signals that the brain may be receiving from the body. The pain is still there and the pain signals are still being sent, but the opiate drug is like a rag in a ringing alarm clock–it simply dampens the brain’s awareness of that pain.

The problem with the current drug crisis is that it is a very complicated and expensive problem to try to fix. There is no easy answer, and there is no inexpensive answer. Furthermore, even if we throw a great deal of money at the problem it will not necessarily solve it or even make much of an impact. In other words, we need to do the right things and we also need to be willing to invest heavily in doing those things well.

So what are those solutions, and what do they look like? For one thing, we can attempt to step up our prevention efforts, though no one is really sure if that will have the kind of downstream effect that we are hoping for. Traditionally, prevention efforts of the past have not done much to prevent the current crisis, so it is questionable if doubling down on prevention would have the effect that we want. But it might be better than not trying at all.

Second, we could pour more money and funding into treatment programs for existing addicts. So one of the things that is sorely needed in the battle against addiction is a much more intense focus on inpatient treatment.

While there are a variety of possible options for a struggling drug addict–ranging from AA meetings to IOP to counseling to sober living to inpatient rehab–it could be argued that the most effective starting point for a struggling addict is to go to a 28 day inpatient program.

One of the problems with this is that treatment of that kind is not cheap, and most addicts are not exactly flush with cash, resources, and great health insurance. Instead, the typical addict may have lost all of their money as well as the job that was needed to get them decent health insurance that would have possibly covered inpatient treatment. But because they tend to lose their job as a result of their addiction, the typical addict often has no money or health insurance to be able to get the help that they need.

Some people argue against this solution because the success rate of traditional treatment programs is typically fairly low. If you take 100 addicts and put them through a 28 day inpatient program, how many of them are still clean and sober a year later? Unfortunately, the answer seems to be “very few of them,” with statistics generally reporting around 20 percent “making it” at best. However, no matter what the actual success rate is, we know that it is higher than zero, and essentially zero is what we are getting when we do not attempt any sort of solution at all.

One of the other problems with inpatient treatment as the solution has to do with the stigma that is attached to it. So part of the long term solution, if that solution is to include a push for more treatment services, is going to have to include some sort of effort to reduce the perceived stigma that our society has towards the treatment process. If we want to push more and more people to get help then we may need to rearrange how we view treatment in general, and what our overall opinions are of.

Another shift that may be happening over the next few years may come in the form of MAT, or “medication assisted treatment.” This is what you used to know as the “methadone maintenance program” but today is becoming more and more sophisticated as we develop new and safer drugs to treat addiction with. For example, in the world of opiate abuse we are now using Suboxone as a safer and less addictive alternative to methadone. Also, there are new medications on the horizon that can be used to reduce cravings for cocaine, and there are already a few medications that exist to treat alcoholism. While it may not be a total solution just yet, the future of drug and alcohol addiction treatment may very well be a new wave of medications that reduce cravings and block the euphoric effects of recreational drugs. These new medications may even be semi permanent implants that, once taken, simply do their job to help us regulate our addictions. Nobody knows for sure how this medical technology will evolve or to what extent it will impact the face of recovery, but it could have quite a large impact based on the last few years of research.

The reason that MAT may become the focal point of treatment is based on the generational differences that we are seeing unfold. The “old way” of treatment involved going to rehab and following that up with devout AA attendance, sponsorship, reading literature, and step work. Are younger people today going to embrace the path of “hard work in recovery” over something as easy as getting an “anti craving implant?” It seems unlikely. Of course, what we really care about is the fact that we need a treatment plan that works and actually helps people to reduce the overall damages and cost to society. For every addict we can “save” today, we prevent a considerable amount of cost and damages in the future.

The post Is Cocaine Making a Comeback Amidst the Opiate Crisis? appeared first on Spiritual River Addiction Help.

from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8241841 https://ift.tt/2qZJJ2t

[avoidtheflourish-blog1]

Does LED Light Therapy Really Improve Skin?

When I first heard about the use of LED light therapy as a treatment for rejuvinating skin, I was intrigued. It seemed like an effective way to get glowy and younger-looking skin without needles—plus, celebrity facialist Joanna Vargas famously created an LED light bed that's Vogue-approved and sought-after by A-listers, so it had to be good.

But my interest was really piqued when I learned that LED light had the power to help banish blemishes and breakouts (my problem skin is basically the bane of my existence). Since I'd do anything for a clearer complexion, I put LED light therapy to the test, and (spoiler alert) loved the results.

Click here to see the full benefits of LED Light therapy device

Yes, LED Facial Treatments Do Work (But Not In A Flash)                          

If you follow any celebrities on Instagram, chances are you've come across a picture of an LED treatment before.

You know that strange-looking serial killer mask that retails for about $2,000? That's it. Or perhaps you've thought of trying one of the many at-home handheld devices, such as the Quasar MD Plus that Kim Kardashian uses (apparently, she's "really big on laser facials"). Or maybe you've seen someone wearing funky protective eyewear at a medispa or doctor's office and all kinds of bright lights were involved? Yep, that would be it as well. LED skin treatments all the rage nowadays. Here's what you need to know about them.

Blue light or red light?

There are various kinds of LED facials available on the market today, and the technology is rapidly evolving. Some skin treatments involve the use of blue light, while some only use red light.

The basic premise of LED skin therapy is that different colours trigger different reactions beneath the epidermis and penetrate the skin at varying depths. Blue light is generally used to kill the bacteria that causes acne, providing an effective treatment for blackheads and whiteheads, whereas wavelengths of red light are normally used to speed up healing and stimulate collagen production, simultaneously shrinking enlarged pores and tightening the skin.

LED treatments are painless, non-invasive and no downtime is required. According to Sacha Bourdage, Director of Laser Services at the Victoria Park Medispa in Montreal, Canada, "people are looking for a lot of alternatives these days... An LED treatment is great for targeting areas that are hard to hit with Botox and injectables, bringing out the plumpness and reducing the appearance of crow's feet and other wrinkles."

https://www.vitactivate.com/products/red-light-therapy-home-device-anti-aging

Do LED light facials really work?

The treatments can last a mere few minutes, depending on the type of technology used. That's right! Perfect during lunch hour, much?

OK, but do they really work?

Dr. R. Glen Calderhead, one of the world's leading experts in phototherapy and photosurgery, seems to think so. In a recently published study, he states that "low-level light therapy (LLLT) with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is emerging from the mists of black magic as a solid medico-scientific modality, with a substantial buildup of corroborative bodies of evidence for its efficacy and elucidation of the modes of action. Reports are appearing from many different specialties; however, of particular interest to plastic surgeons treating the aging face is the proven action of LED-LLLT on skin cells in both the epidermis and dermis and enhanced blood flow. Thus, LED-LLLT is a safe and effective stand-alone therapy for patients who are prepared to wait until the final effect is perceived."

So, yes -- but not overnight.

And the price is rather steep, too: count on average $50 to $300 per treatment. And although some customers who've undergone blue light therapy claim that most of their dimples disappeared after a single treatment, Bourdage advises caution: "It's not a cure. It's a treatment." Typically, you'll need at least four treatments before you start noticing results. In order to rejuvenate the skin's appearance, improve its texture and reduce the appearance of wrinkles, a few weeks will be required. The good news? The benefits are cumulative, and one treatment per year is normally sufficient to maintain the results afterwards.

You can do it at home, too: according to prominent New York City aesthetic medicine expert Dr Z. Paul Lorenc, using a pharmacy-bought LED skincare device can be a great alternative to clinical-grade treatments: "Probably the biggest pro is that it works. Studies conducted using LED for acne and anti-aging showed significant improvement in both. The biggest con is that you have to commit to using it every day. This needs to become part of your daily skin care regimen. For some this may be a burden!"

For patients that lack discipline, opting for a more powerful machine might be a better option: "Light is measured in nanometers, and LED lights have different depths. Devices like the one that we have here can only be used in medispas or on a medical level... It all comes down to the expectations you have," says Dr. Lorenc.

"LED light has demonstrated significant efficacy for various skin pathologies," says Bourdage. "The LED light by itself can stimulate specific cell lines and improve certain aspects of the skin, and the technology can be further improved when combined with light-absorbing chromophore gel, which allows the LED light to penetrate deeper into the skin. We use Lumibel to reduce the appearance of crow's feet, marionette lines, forehead lines and pore size. For patients with acne-prone skin, we offer a treatment called Lumibel."

Here's how a typical LumiBel light-emitting diode session unfolds: the patient comes in after having her picture taken and lies down on an examination table, where the aesthetician uses a gentle cleanser to remove any makeup or impurities before applying a special gel onto her face. The multi-LED LumiBel blue light system is then used to activate the gel, converting the light from the lamp into different color wavelengths. The light panels can also be used on other acne-prone body areas, such as the chest or back.

Although the machine never actually touches the skin, the patient must wear protective eyewear. At Victoria Park & other medispas, small stickers can be placed over the eye area in order to treat crow's feet. "How can you expect the LED light to treat your crow's feet if you're wearing these huge goggles?" exclaims Bourdage. Indeed... Make sure you keep this in mind when booking your next appointment! Don't be afraid to ask the receptionist if stickers -- not just goggles -- are available at your local medical spa or dermatologist's office.

This particular treatment lasts nine minutes (most LED treatments are over in less than twenty minutes), during which a warm, pleasant sensation can be felt over the entire face. While you're there you can listen to some background music, mediate, even take a power nap -- honestly, the whole process really isn't as freaky as it may sound.

After the treatment, once the gel is delicately removed, a moisturizer is applied along with an SPF to protect the skin from UV rays. Flushing very rarely occurs. That's right, you're free to walk around town or go right back to work -- no one will ever guess what you were doing just a few minutes before. "Most of our patients find it relaxing!" Bourdage candidly points out. And based on their comments and the technology's commercial success, it certainly seems like it's here to stay.

What is LED Light Therapy?

First off, let's talk about what LED stands for: light emitting diode. Without getting too technical, an LED is a light source that emits infrared light (and thereby, heat) when activated, exactly like the machine pictured below. LED light therapy is most often administered via single light units or formations of panels that are directed at the skin from a few inches away. The benefits come from exposure to the light; there is no machine-to-skin contact when the panels are involved. It can also be administered through a handheld wand that you would expose skin to in the same way. Most spas use the panels, because they cover more surface area, while the hand-held devices are a more practical option for at-home use.

LED lights come in different spectrums, including red, white, and blue infrared.

Reviews at RealSelf

In an effort to brighten my overall skin tone to...

In an effort to brighten my overall skin tone to correct years of sun damage and acne pigmentation, I found that Forever Young BBL was my logical procedure choice. Admittedly, research of YouTube videos and online reviews were mixed and prompted me to seek a private consultation for further enquiry.

Clear Rayz Blue/red LED   

jessicarabbitmiami said : Let's start with the basics: I am in my mid-thirties and have very thin porcelain skin. I also get mild adult acne since having my tubes tied. The hormone changes are very apparent in my skin. It has lost some lustre and elasticity, and i have noticeable melasma now. I also have some sun damage... READ MORE    11 photos 8 comments 15 members found this helpful Not Sure

My First Experiment with Green and Blue LED Treatments  

 Jeanne1786 said:  I have been using a blue LED panel at home for three days now to treat a pimple and one cystic acne bump. Make that two cysts because there was another that reared its ugly head (no pun intended) today. (Ba-dum-pum!) Results from the blue LED light panel: AWESOME! Even after the first...

Burning Tongue After Blue Light Treatment  

 GeminiGirl77 said:  I did an at home treatment with blue light on my chin and upper lip area to treat a breakout. I shined the light around the area for about 10 minutes total, I didn't feel any heat or discomfort. After about half an hour I started getting a tingling sensation in my front teeth and a burning... READ MORE    2 comments Worth It

Wrinkle and Skin Quality Treatment - New York, NY   

EONYC said: Excellent bedside manner and treatment - - very noticeable difference to my skin. She took time to understand what I wanted out of the treatments and recommended various options. She is very flexible in timing. She also helps to establish an at home regiment that will retain the treatment... 

References

https://www.realself.com/LED-Skin-Treatment/reviews