#FreeSWITCH vs asterisk

[gventuretech]

In the world of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) systems, FreeSWITCH vs Asterisk stand out as two powerhouse solutions, each offering unique features and capabilities. We delve into the differences between these two platforms, helping you make an informed decision about which one is the right fit for your needs. For more detail visit at https://shorturl.at/xMR78

[crmvoipsoftwaresolutions]

Asterisk Development vs. FreeSWITCH Development in VoIP Solutions

In the dynamic landscape of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) development, businesses encounter the choice between Asterisk and FreeSWITCH as their preferred platforms. Both are renowned for their open-source nature and extensive feature sets, understanding the nuances between Asterisk development and FreeSWITCH development is crucial for making informed decisions regarding communication infrastructure. Let's delve deeper into the intricacies of each platform to help you navigate this vital choice for your organization.

Asterisk Development: Developed by Asterisk developers globally, Asterisk has established itself as a versatile and powerful VoIP platform. Renowned for its rich feature set, including call routing, conferencing, voicemail, and Interactive Voice Response (IVR), Asterisk appeals to businesses seeking flexibility and customization in their communication solutions. Asterisk development companies leverage its open-source architecture to craft tailored solutions that meet specific business requirements, empowering organizations with control over their communication infrastructure.

Conversely, FreeSWITCH Development offers a compelling alternative for businesses aiming for scalability and performance. Developed by experienced FreeSWITCH developers, this platform boasts advanced media handling capabilities, support for various communication protocols, and high scalability, making it a preferred choice for large-scale deployments and carrier-grade solutions. FreeSWITCH development companies collaborate with businesses to harness its features for complex telecommunication projects and real-time communication applications.

When evaluating Asterisk and FreeSWITCH development, several factors merit consideration:

Scalability and Performance: 

While both platforms offer scalability, FreeSWITCH is often favored for its superior performance and media handling capabilities, making it suitable for demanding environments and high-volume traffic.

Customization and Flexibility: 

Asterisk development stands out for its extensive customization options, allowing businesses to tailor solutions to their specific needs. However, FreeSWITCH also offers robust customization capabilities, catering to complex requirements and diverse use cases.

Community Support and Resources: 

Asterisk benefits from a vast and active community of developers and users, providing comprehensive resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations. Similarly, FreeSWITCH boasts a dedicated community and support channels, ensuring assistance for businesses embarking on FreeSWITCH development projects.

Cost Considerations: 

While both platforms are open-source and offer cost-effective solutions compared to proprietary alternatives, businesses must factor in development costs, ongoing maintenance, and support when evaluating the total cost of ownership.

Integration and Compatibility: 

Both Asterisk and FreeSWITCH seamlessly integrate with a variety of third-party applications and services, enhancing interoperability and functionality within the communication ecosystem.

Concluding notes

In conclusion, the choice between Asterisk development and FreeSWITCH development hinges on your organization's specific requirements, scalability needs, and long-term objectives. Whether you opt for Asterisk or FreeSWITCH development, partnering with experienced VoIP development companies and skilled Asterisk or FreeSWITCH developers is paramount for ensuring a successful implementation aligned with your business objectives. By understanding the nuances of each platform, businesses can make informed decisions and leverage the power of open-source VoIP solutions to drive communication excellence. AC InfoSoft is one of the leading VoIP development companies offering Asterisk and FreeSWITCH development services. To learn more about this VoIP development company and its technology-specific services, please visit https://www.acinfosoft.com/voip-development-services/

[vindaloo-softtech]

Asterisk vs. FreeSWITCH: How Are They Different?

Asterisk and FreeSWITCH are the two most widely used platforms for developing VoIP solutions in the VoIP industry. They are both powerful enough for developers to create any intricate VoIP solutions for teamwork and communication in addition to being open-source technologies.

What is Asterisk? In 1999, Mark Spencer created Asterisk, a piece of software that distributes calls like an expensive PBX. His tiny group created the Asterisk call distribution and handling software for their business, Linux Support Systems, which was eventually renamed Digium.

What is FreeSWITCH? The Asterisk platform has drawbacks, which led to the creation of FreeSWITCH in 2006. Anthony Minessale, a well-known Asterisk developer, made the decision to create a software from scratch to address some of the alleged problems with the Asterisk platform. This was later known popularly as FreeSWITCH.

If you are wondering why to switch from traditional to VoIP calling, here is an article on “PSTN v/s VoIP”

How Does Each Technology Work? The heart of every Asterisk system is the dialplan. It is a scripting language, and the modules are used to give instructions to the Asterisk system through the configuration directory. Developers may implement a variety of capabilities, including call reception on a particular SIP channel, call connection to IVR, and dial plan-based call routing. Asterisk's configuration files are stored as standard text files.

FreeSWITCH adopts a different strategy; the system was created in C, and the core programming was better organized. FreeSWITCH uses processing threads that operate uniformly throughout memory, in contrast to the Asterisk approach, which gives each channel its own thread and memory space.

Basic Functionality On the most fundamental level, both technologies offer the majority of the same functionality. Voicemail, call recording, and IVR menus should be available on every FreeSWITCH Development or Asterisk-based switch on the market. With any design, the steps involved in constructing extensions and gateways are quite similar. Nevertheless, depending on the server's Memory and core performance, different numbers of users may be supported. For communication with other Asterisk systems, Asterisk needs the proprietary IAX protocol, but FreeSWITCH is not constrained in this regard.

MultiTenancy One of FreeSWITCH’s features is its capacity to support several tenants. As a result, many user branches may use a single FreeSWITCH system as unique entities under their own domains or subdomains. For multi-tenancy to function on Asterisk systems, costly proprietary solutions must be constructed on top of it at the time of Asterisk software development.

Clustering Asterisk is primarily made to operate on a single system. Using a single PBX server to install all roles is equivalent to placing all of your eggs in just one basket. Thus, it is advised to divide each system, performing a given function, into a distinct server for large-scale or enterprise- level PBX servers, i.e., distributed architecture. While FreeSWITCH solutions makes it simple for separate systems in the cluster to execute individual duties, accomplishing this with Asterisk is difficult.

IM abilities Systems like Asterisk and FreeSWITCH provide cutting-edge communication features including conference, video calling, and chat. Unfortunately, the majority of Asterisk systems require on an add-on for IM functionality, which businesses must pay extra fees for. With FreeSWITCH, the only requirements are that the XMPP service be enabled and that the end devices be correctly set up for IM.

Device Deployment Capabilities On either FreeSWITCH or Asterisk networks, device deployment varies greatly. Several endpoint management modules for IP phones and softphones are supported by Asterisk, however, access to the provisioning software costs around $100. Compared to Asterisk, FreeSWITCH offers a significantly smaller selection.

Wrapping Up There is no discernible difference between a well-setup system running Asterisk or FreeSWITCH for the end user. In fact, FreeSWITCH provides a wider variety of modularity and is a better option for various VoIP solutions. With more than six years of experience developing commercial communication solutions using either open-source VoIP communication technology, Vindaloo Softtech is an accomplished VoIP development firm.

[nelsongibs22]

FreeSWITCH and Asterisk are PBX. They are used as popular VoIP development technologies to build various VoIP solutions. Learn the difference between Asterisk and FreeSWITCH.

[opensourcelistings]

FreeSWITCH  vs Asterisk

FreeSWITCH vs Asterisk Asterisk Asterisk was founded in 1999 as a result of the efforts of a computer engineer named Mark Spencer. His tiny team created the Asterisk software switch for Linux Support Systems, which was ultimately renamed Digium. The Asterisk switch has now been included into a number of PBX systems, including FreePBX, Elastix, and PBX in a Flash. It’s worth noting that Asterisk…

[astpp2020]

What Makes ASTPP Better Than A2Billing Technically?

ASTPP and A2Billing are two popular names in the VoIP industry often referred to, when someone decided to use an open source VoIP billing solution with the class 4 Softswitch features or vice versa. If you are also considering using an open source VoIP billing software solution with the class 4 Softswitch features, then I will recommend using ASTPP. If you are wondering why then read on. In this article, I will share the top reason to use ASTPP over A2Billing by keeping technical aspects in mind.

1. Technologies

The first and foremost thing is ASTPP is a technically stronger platform than A2Billing. ASTPP is developed using different cutting edge technologies and platforms, including OpenSIPs and FreeSWITCH unlike A2Billing, which is developed using the Asterisk platform. FreeSWITCH makes ASTPP a highly scalable, robust, and reliable platform. You can handle 1000 concurrent calls on 2 servers unlike A2Billing, which can handle only 500 calls on 2 servers. By increasing servers, you can handle thousands of concurrent calls with ease if you use ASTPP.

2. Highly scalable solution

ASTPP is also a highly scalable solution. Whether the number of calls increases or some sort of fault occurs in the hardware, you can still be rest assured that your services will not stop. ASTPP offers excellent load balancing and failover support using OpenSIPs as SIP registrars. You must use ASTPP if you are looking for a reliable class 4 Softswitch with a billing solution. Bonus tips: ASTPP offers several other VoIP solutions unlike A2Billing, which only has a class 4 Softswitch with a VoIP billing system to offer.

3. Technical support

ASTPP has an active community, so in case if you need any technical help and if you are an open source version user, you can ask that easily. On the other hand, if you use the ASTPP enterprise solution, you can avail the technical help from experts. The ASTPP community also shares resources like webinars, video tutorials, documentation, etc. to provide active technical support to the ASTPP users.

4. Installation 

Let’s talk about the installation, which is the first technical step to use any VoIP solution similar to other software or apps. A2Billing has some manual steps, which you need to follow to install it. Unlike that, ASTPP has an installation script. At your fingertips, you can install ASTPP. If you are using the ASTPP enterprise solution, then it will be installed by the ASTPP experts for you. A2Billing is not compatible with the latest technologies unlike ASTPP, which can be installed on the latest OS and platforms, including, Debian and CentOS.

Due to multiple reasons, ASTPP is better than A2Billing technically as well as from other aspects as well. If you want to know more about the difference between ASTPP and A2Billing, read this blog on the Difference between ASTPP and A2Billing.

To know the technical comparison between A2Billing and ASTPP, please visit https://www.astppbilling.org/blog/a2billing-vs-astpp/

[voipfaqs-blog]

FreeSwitch vs Asterisk 2012

Asterisk

Asterisk uses a modular design where a central core loads shared objects to extend the functionality with bits of code known as “modules”. 

Modules are used to implement specific protocols such as SIP, add applications such as custom IVRs and tie in other external interfaces such as the Manager Interface.

The core of Asterisk VoIP software is a threading model but a very conservative one.

Asterisk uses linked-lists to manage its open channels.

Asterisk has no protection of its API. 

  FreeSwitch

FreeSWITCH traps all the common functionality under the hood and expose it in a pyramid to the higher levels of the application.

FreeSwitch uses a modular design.

Every channel has it’s own thread no matter what it was doing and that thread would use a state machine function to navigate its way through the core.

FreeSwitch uses read/write locking so the channels can be located from a hashing algorithm rather than a linked list and there is an absolute guarantee that the channel cannot be accessed or go away while an outside thread has reference to it.

[nelsongibs22]

In the realm of VoIP technology, two powerful platforms have been ruling since their inception. One is an age-old Asterisk and the other is younger FreeSWITCH. Both have a plethora of enterprise-friendly features to facilitate customized VoIP development for addressing business communication requirements. Though both the platforms are capable of simplifying all the complexities of unified communication, it is interesting to go through the characteristics that make them distinct from each other.