#Justice Lisa Holder White | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

dreaminginthedeepsouth · 3 years

Link

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

July 17, 2021

Heather Cox Richardson

A year ago tonight, Georgia Representative John Lewis passed away from pancreatic cancer at 80 years old. As a young adult, Lewis was a “troublemaker,” breaking the laws of his state: the laws upholding racial segregation. He organized voting registration drives and in 1960 was one of the thirteen original Freedom Riders, white and Black students traveling together from Washington, D.C., to New Orleans to challenge segregation. “It was very violent. I thought I was going to die. I was left lying at the Greyhound bus station in Montgomery unconscious,” Lewis later recalled.

An adherent of the philosophy of nonviolence, Lewis was beaten by mobs and arrested 24 times. As chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC—pronounced “snick”), he helped to organize the 1963 March on Washington where the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., told more than 200,000 people gathered at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial that he had a dream. Just 23 years old, Lewis spoke at the march. Two years later, as Lewis and 600 marchers hoping to register African American voters in Alabama stopped to pray at the end of the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, mounted police troopers charged the marchers, beating them with clubs and bullwhips. They fractured Lewis’s skull.

To observers in 1965 reading the newspapers, Lewis was simply one of the lawbreaking protesters who were disrupting the “peace” of the South. But what seemed to be fruitless and dangerous protests were, in fact, changing minds. Shortly after the attack in Selma, President Lyndon Baines Johnson honored those changing ideas when he went on TV to support the marchers and call for Congress to pass a national voting rights bill. On August 6, 1965, Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act authorizing federal supervision of voter registration in districts where African Americans were historically underrepresented.

When Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, just 6.7 percent of Black voters in Mississippi were registered to vote. Two years later, almost 60% of them were. In 1986, those new Black voters helped to elect Lewis to Congress. He held the seat until he died, winning reelection 16 times.

Now, just a year after Representative Lewis’s death, the voting rights for which he fought are under greater threat than they have been since 1965. After the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision of the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act by taking away Department of Justice supervision of election changes in states with a history of racial discrimination, Republican-dominated state legislatures began to enact measures that would cut down on minority voting.

At Representative Lewis’s funeral, former President Barack Obama called for renewing the Voting Rights Act. "You want to honor John?” he said. “Let's honor him by revitalizing the law that he was willing to die for.” Instead, after the 2020 election, Republican-dominated legislatures ramped up their effort to skew the vote in their favor by limiting access to the ballot. As of mid-June 2021, 17 states had passed 28 laws making it harder to vote, while more bills continue to move forward.

Then, on July 1, by a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court handed down Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, saying that the state of Arizona did not violate the 1965 Voting Rights Act when it passed laws that limited ballot delivery to voters, family members, or caregivers, or when it required election officials to throw out ballots that voters had cast in the wrong precincts by accident.

The fact that voting restrictions affect racial or ethnic groups differently does not make them illegal, Justice Samuel Alito wrote. “The mere fact that there is some disparity in impact does not necessarily mean that a system is not equally open or that it does not give everyone an equal opportunity to vote.”

Justice Elena Kagan wrote a blistering dissent, in which Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined. “If a single statute represents the best of America, it is the Voting Rights Act,” Kagan wrote, “It marries two great ideals: democracy and racial equality. And it dedicates our country to carrying them out.” She explained, “The Voting Rights Act is ambitious, in both goal and scope. When President Lyndon Johnson sent the bill to Congress, ten days after John Lewis led marchers across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, he explained that it was “carefully drafted to meet its objective—the end of discrimination in voting in America.” It gave every citizen “the right to an equal opportunity to vote.”

“Much of the Voting Rights Act’s success lay in its capacity to meet ever-new forms of discrimination,” Kagan wrote. Those interested in suppressing the vote have always offered “a non-racial rationalization” even for laws that were purposefully discriminatory. Poll taxes, elaborate registration regulations, and early poll closings were all designed to limit who could vote but were defended as ways to prevent fraud and corruption, even when there was no evidence that fraud or corruption was a problem. Kagan noted that the Arizona law permitting the state to throw out ballots cast in the wrong precinct invalidated twice as many ballots cast by Indigenous Americans, Black Americans, and Hispanic Americans as by whites.

“The majority’s opinion mostly inhabits a law-free zone,” she wrote.

Congress has been slow to protect voting rights. Although it renewed the Voting Rights Act by an overwhelming majority in 2006, that impulse has disappeared. In March 2021, the House of Representatives passed the For the People Act on which Representative Lewis had worked, a sweeping measure that protects the right to vote, removes dark money from politics, and ends partisan gerrymandering. Republicans in the Senate killed the bill, and Democrats were unwilling to break the filibuster to pass it alone.

An attempt simply to restore the provision of the Voting Rights Act gutted in 2013 has not yet been introduced, although it has been named: the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Only one Republican, Alaska senator Lisa Murkowski, has signed on to the bill.

Yesterday, the chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, Representative Joyce Beatty (D-OH), was arrested with eight other protesters in the Hart Senate Office Building for demanding legislation to protect voting rights.

After her arrest, Beatty tweeted: “You can arrest me. You can’t stop me. You can’t silence me.”

Last June, Representative Lewis told Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart that he was “inspired” by last summer’s peaceful protests in America and around the world against police violence. “It was so moving and so gratifying to see people from all over America and all over the world saying through their action, ‘I can do something. I can say something,’” Lewis told Capehart. “And they said something by marching and by speaking up and speaking out.”

Capehart asked Lewis “what he would say to people who feel as though they have already been giving it their all but nothing seems to change.” Lewis answered: “You must be able and prepared to give until you cannot give any more. We must use our time and our space on this little planet that we call Earth to make a lasting contribution, to leave it a little better than we found it, and now that need is greater than ever before.”

“Do not get lost in a sea of despair,” Lewis tweeted almost exactly a year before his death. “Do not become bitter or hostile. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble. We will find a way to make a way out of no way.”

—-

Notes:

Capehart: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/06/10/john-lewis-black-lives-matter-protesters-give-until-you-cannot-give-any-more/

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2021-07-02/17-states-have-passed-restrictive-voting-laws-this-year-report-says

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-1257_g204.pdf

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

#political #Letters From An American #Heather Cox Richardson #John Lewis #voter rights #history #racial equality

2 notes · View notes

opedguy · 4 years

Text

Political Calculation in Ginsburg’s Death

LOS ANGELES (OnlineColumnist.com), Sept. 19, 2020.--When 87-year-old Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg [RBG] passed away yesterday from pancreatic cancer, no one imagined all the repercussions to follow before she’s laid to rest. While thousands of her admirers lit candles and laid flowed on the steps of the Supreme Court, 74-year-old President Donald Trump and 78-year old Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) were busy dealing with the political fallout, especially if there’s a backlash for pushing a nominee through before the Nov. 3 election. But unlike four years ago when McConnell would not consider former President Barack Obama’s pick 67-yar-old D.C. Court of Appeals Chief Judge Merrick Garland, times have changed. McConnell pointed out that it’s different today because the GOP controlled the presidency and the Senate, where in 2016 Democrats controlled the House and White House.

Getting a new nominee approved would require 51 votes in the Senate, a simple majority, not as easy as Trump or McConnell hoped, given opposition from 67-year-old Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and 63-year Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), both of whom stated they oppose approving a nominee this close to an election. With Democrats holding 47 Senate seats, Republicans can only lose three with 61-year-old Vice President Mike Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. Whether Collins and Murkowski jump ship and oppose moving a nominee forward before the election is anyone’s guess. Both have been on record opposing the process. But times have changed, with 72-year-old former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton urging 77-year-old former Vice President Joe Biden to not concede no matter what. “Joe Biden should not conceded under any circumstances . . . “ Hillary said Aug.. 26.

Biden announced Sept. 16 that Democrats are assembling an army of election law attorneys led by former Obama Atty. Gen. Eric Holder to fight any protracted result on Nov. 3. With legal challenges like that, Trump, McConnell and the Republican Party have no choice but to move ahead with a nominee in the time before the election. Without restoring the court of a nine-members, there’s a distinct possibility that the court could hang four-to-four, unable to render a verdict on the election’s outcome should it be contested. Judging by what Hillary said, there will be a dispute, telling Biden to not concede “under any circumstances.” With the possibility of a constitutional crisis, Collins and Murkowski may have to recalculate their initial decision to oppose a nominee before the Nov. 3 election. Without a nine-member court, the nation could face a constitutional crisis after the election

Trump’s best argument for nominating Ginsburg’s replacement in a timely manner has to do with Democrats’ open pledge to fight the outcome of any election result. Without a nine-member court, the High Court could be hopelessly deadlocked, hurting U.S. national security. There’s simply no way in a contested election without resolution in the courts that the U.S. can proceed in an orderly manner. Sen.. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said he would not bring a nominee to the Judiciary committee so close to an election. But with all the new constitutional concerns, Grassley would likely support Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham’s (R-N.C.) decision to process a replacement for RBG at the earliest possible time. Hillary’s public remarks, and, most importantly, her ongoing clout in the Democrat Party, makes Trump’s decision to nominate a replacement an urgent matter.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) blasted McConnell for suggesting he’d deviate from his position blocking Obama from processing a nominee in 2016. But as McConnell explained, it’s an entirely different situation today, with a Republican president and Republican Senate. More importantly than that are Democrats stated warnings that they will not accept the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, assembling an army of attorneys to fight the result. “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president,” McConnell said Feb. 12, 2016, hours after Associate Justice Antonin Scalia died. Comments by Hillary and Joe force Trump’s hand to appoint Ginsburg’s replacement. All arguments about what happened four years ago are superseded by Democrat threats.

In more predictable times, Trump and McConnell should let the people and next president choose the next Supreme Court Associate Justice. But based on Hillary telling Democrats that Biden should not concede “under any circumstances” and Joe assembling an army of attorneys to fight the outcome if Joe loses, Trump and McConnell have no choice but to move swiftly to confirm Ginsburg’s replacement. Republicans that once agreed in principle that Supreme Court picks should be deferred to the next president, no longer applies now that a Battle Royale has been set up to contest the Nov. 3 election. “The most difficult months in a generation are now upon us. Pray that God protect out country and provide wisdom to our people,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fl.) fearing that street unrest could get much worse before the election. Democrats pushed the GOP to take a hard line.

About the Author

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He’s editor of OnlineColumnist.com and author of Dodging The Bullet and Operation Charisma. Reply Reply All Forward

0 notes

arts-dance · 6 years

Photo

By Kimberly Bradley * 20 September 2016

Pleading… or challenging? In her portraits, it’s difficult to read what might have been going on behind the limpid, dark eyes of Adele Bloch-Bauer, the only women that fin de siècle Austrian artist Gustav Klimt portrayed not once, but twice. But this is clearly a woman of depth and mystery. In a new exhibition Klimt and the Women of Vienna’s Golden Age at New York’s Neue Galerie, both portraits – the iconic, long-controversial Adele Bloch-Bauer I (1907) and the lesser-known but no less stunning Adele Bloch-Bauer II(1912) – will be shown together for the first time in more than a decade.

The exhibition includes portraits of other women, but Adele remains the most iconic. It is she, as a ‘woman in gold’, who anchors the works that represent the apex of Klimt’s ‘golden phase’. (Speculation is, too, that she is the half-nude figure in Klimt’s Judith and the Head of Holofernes, and possibly the closed-eyed, blissed-out woman in The Kiss.) It is she who embodies both the vulnerability and strength of women in turn-of-the-century Vienna, a society in profound transition.

In postwar Vienna her image became a symbol of Austrian culture – Adele Bloch-Bauer I was long called ‘the Austrian Mona Lisa’. The painting later became an icon of justice – the 2015 film Woman in Gold is the Hollywood version of the tale of the painting’s confiscation from the Jewish Bloch-Bauer family during World War Two and the long but ultimately successful struggle for restitution by Bloch-Bauer’s niece Maria Altmann. Over the past century, many viewers have asked: who was Adele Bloch-Bauer?

‘Symphony in gold’

Bloch-Bauer was born Adele Bauer in Vienna in 1881. The daughter of a bank and railway director, she led a privileged, cultured childhood; at 19, she married Ferdinand Bloch, a sugar magnate 17 years her senior. Ferdinand adored the young woman, enough to make her last name part of his own. (Both became Bloch-Bauers; their siblings married each other, too, making for two couples with the same hyphenated last name.) The family were avid art patrons, not only collecting but also commissioning paintings – and the maverick, kaftan-clad Gustav Klimt was one of their favorite artists.

The first portrait of Adele was originally discussed in a letter the then 22-year-old wrote to Klimt in 1903. Ferdinand commissioned it as a gift for Adele’s parents’ anniversary a few years after Klimt co-founded the Vienna Secession, and not long after his scandalous, allegedly pornographic murals saw the University of Vienna blacklist the painter from state commissions.

Adele Bloch-Bauer I was first publicly displayed in 1907: a stunning scene in oil and gold leaf; it shows a flushed, bare-shouldered Adele in a stylised throne, gazing at the viewer with both vulnerability and pride, her hands oddly clasped in the foreground – one of her fingers was deformed, which she often attempted to conceal in her many sittings with the artist, who created some 200 studies for the portrait. The painting’s background is a lush riot of glittering Oriental and erotic symbolism – triangles, eyes, eggs. “The golden image of Adele Bloch-Bauer I cast a spell over me even as an art history student,” says Tobias Natter, a Vienna-based historian and curator of the Neue Galerie exhibition. “For me it’s a symphony in gold, a unique emblematic triumph.” It is considered an Art Nouveau masterpiece.

The later painting is a dramatic departure: “How could Klimt have evolved from the first painting?” asks Natter. “With Adele Bloch-Bauer IIfive years later, he does something completely diffferent, an enormous stylistic evolution is clear.” The painting shows the raven-haired Adele in a wide-brimmed black hat standing majestically, frontally facing the viewer; the background a tableau of brightly colored patterned wallpaper. “What excites me about this image is the renewal through the power of colour.

All that glitters

Here, Bloch-Bauer is very much the grande dame, but her eyes reveal a more mature melancholy. Despite privilege, life hadn’t always been kind to her. Altmann, who died in 2011, remembered her aunt as a “rather cold, intellectual woman who was very politically aware and became a socialist. She wasn't happy. It was an arranged marriage but she was childless, after two miscarriages and the death of a baby. I remember her as extremely elegant, tall, dark and thin. She always wore a slinky white dress and used a long, gold cigarette holder.”

Gustav Klimt’s women exuded not only a profound eroticism, but also strength and confidence. Critics and art historians over the decades have dubbed Klimt art’s “Frauenversteher” – “understander of women,” and many speculated that Adele and Klimt had an ongoing affair. It was never confirmed. In his paintings, Bloch-Bauer always appears sovereign, grand, even exalted.

In at least one area of her life, she very much was. Like others depicted in the Neue Galerie exhibition, she belonged to a largely Jewish bourgeoisie – whose women wielded considerable social and intellectual power through hosting salons. One Berta Zuckerkandl, for example, was of slightly lower social stature but was known as ‘the puppeteer of the Viennese cultural scene’ for all the connections she made, including introducing Klimt to Auguste Rodin; the Secession was apparently conceived over conversations in her living room. Many society women, like Szeréna Lederer (who, over 40 years, amassed the largest collection of Klimt in private hands at the time) and her daughter Elisabeth, appeared in Klimt portraits; the artist began to focus entirely on women as subjects after 1900.

Bloch-Bauer’s weekly salons were frequented by the likes of composers Gustav Mahler and Richard Strauss; author Stefan Zweig was also a visitor. Later, her doctor Julius Tandler – who was also a politician, advocating for social housing and the Austrian welfare state – influenced her toward social reform and women’s suffrage. The Neue Galerie exhibition not only focusses on the shifting roles of women at the time but also on the importance of fashion and design in not only Klimt’s work but in a ‘modern’ Austrian woman’s life. For the many drawn studies for Adele Bloch-Bauer I, Bloch-Bauer posed in stunningly pleated – but completely uncorseted, loose, and flowing – ‘reform’ dresses, at the time worn by bourgeouis women with progressive tendencies.

Bloch-Bauer died of meningitis in 1925, at only 43. Fate perhaps mercifully allowed her to miss the dark years that would descend upon Austria in the 1930s; after her death, her room became a kind of shrine to Klimt’s vision of her. After Austria was annexed by the National Socialists in 1938, the Bloch-Bauers’ art – numerous drawings by Klimt, several landscapes, of course the images of Adele – was confiscated and fell into ownership limbo until both portraits came to hang in Vienna’s illustrious Belvedere museum in the postwar years. There they would stay until 2006, when, after a long and drawn out series of court decisions, the paintings were returned to Altmann, the last surviving direct relative of Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer.

Overwhelmed by prohibitive insurance and storage costs, Altmann sold Adele Bloch-Bauer I to Ronald Lauder – heir to the Estée Lauder cosmetics empire, and founder and director of the Neue Galerie – with the stipulation that it must always be on view; the later painting was sold at Christie’s in 2006, and is currently part of a special loan to the Museum of Modern Art in New York. “It’s not easy to borrow the second painting,” says Natter, explaining the infrequency of the two Adeles being shown together.

In April 2016, the new neighborhood currently under construction around Vienna’s main train station got a new street: Bloch-Bauer Promenade, named after both Adele and Ferdinand. Austria “very much misses” the paintings, especially Adele Bloch-Bauer I, says Natter. But now they “belong to the whole world.”

If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160920-who-was-the-woman-in-gold

2 notes · View notes

hellofastestnewsfan · 4 years

Link

(MINNEAPOLIS) — A majority of the members of the Minneapolis City Council said Sunday they support disbanding the city’s police department, an aggressive stance that comes just as the state has launched a civil rights investigation after George Floyd’s death.

Nine of the council’s 12 members appeared with activists at a rally in a city park Sunday afternoon and vowed to end policing as the city currently knows it. Council member Jeremiah Ellison promised that the council would “dismantle” the department.

“It is clear that our system of policing is not keeping our communities safe,” Lisa Bender, the council president, said. “Our efforts at incremental reform have failed, period.”

Bender went on to say she and the eight other council members that joined the rally are committed to ending the city’s relationship with the police force and “to end policing as we know it and recreate systems that actually keep us safe.”

Floyd, a handcuffed black man, died May 25 after a white officer pressed his knee into Floyd’s neck, ignoring his “I can’t breathe” cries and holding it there even after Floyd stopped moving. His death sparked protests — some violent, many peaceful — that spread nationwide.

Community activists have criticized the Minneapolis department for years for what they say is a racist and brutal culture that resists change. The state of Minnesota launched a civil rights investigation of the department last week, and the first concrete changes came Friday in a stipulated agreement in which the city agreed to ban chokeholds and neck restraints.

A more complete remaking of the department is likely to unfold in coming months.

Disbanding an entire department has happened before. In 2012, with crime rampant in Camden, New Jersey, the city disbanded its police department and replaced it with a new force that covered Camden County. Compton, California, took the same step in 2000, shifting its policing to Los Angeles County.

It was a step that then-Attorney General Eric Holder said the Justice Department was considering for Ferguson, Missouri, after the death of Michael Brown. The city eventually reached an agreement short of that but one that required massive reforms overseen by a court-appointed mediator.

The move to defund or abolish the Minneapolis department is far from assured, with the civil rights investigation likely to unfold over the next several months.

On Saturday, activists for defunding the department staged a protest outside Mayor Jacob Frey’s home. Frey came out to talk with them.

“I have been coming to grips with my own responsibility, my own failure in this,” Frey said. When pressed on whether he supported their demands, Frey said: “I do not support the full abolition of the police department.”

He left to booing.

At another march Saturday during which leaders called for defunding the department, Verbena Dempster said she supported the idea.

“I think, honestly, we’re too far past” the chance for reform, Dempster told Minnesota Public Radio. “We just have to take down the whole system.”

from TIME https://ift.tt/2UnduJ4

#Blogger

0 notes

newstechreviews · 4 years

Link

“It is clear that our system of policing is not keeping our communities safe,” Lisa Bender, the council president, said. “Our efforts at incremental reform have failed, period.”

A more complete remaking of the department is likely to unfold in coming months.

The move to defund or abolish the Minneapolis department is far from assured, with the civil rights investigation likely to unfold over the next several months.

On Saturday, activists for defunding the department staged a protest outside Mayor Jacob Frey’s home. Frey came out to talk with them.

He left to booing.

At another march Saturday during which leaders called for defunding the department, Verbena Dempster said she supported the idea.

“I think, honestly, we’re too far past” the chance for reform, Dempster told Minnesota Public Radio. “We just have to take down the whole system.”

#Blogger

0 notes

dontmeantobepoliticalbut · 1 year

Text

In 2007, Reginald Lane shot and killed Jwonda Thurston, his pregnant girlfriend. For the murder, he was sentenced to life in prison, following state statute for someone who is found guilty of killing “more than one victim.”

On Thursday, the Illinois Supreme Court heard arguments in Lane’s case, specifically around whether Lane was given the appropriate sentence. Lane’s appeal hinges, in part, on whether Thurston’s unborn child can be considered a “victim” of the murder and, more broadly, whether it can be considered an “individual” under the law.

“As it stands now, the unified code of corrections defines a victim as any natural person who suffered direct harm,” Talon Nouri, an attorney representing Lane, told the Justices. “And again, the statute on statutes notes that whenever the word ‘person’ or ‘individual’ is used, that person must have first been born alive.”

Nouri also cited the state’s Reproductive Health Act, a 2019 law that, among other things, stipulates fetuses do not have independent rights in the state of Illinois.

In addition to the question of what constitutes a “victim” under state law, Nouri also argued Lane’s sentence was inappropriately applied because the lower courts had sentenced Lane in alignment with the sentence for a double murder.

Lane was convicted of both first-degree murder and killing an unborn child – also called feticide – which are two distinct crimes.

“While the penalty section of the ‘intentional homicide of an unborn child’ statute states that the sentence shall be the same as for first degree murder, the relevant statutes and definitions unambiguously exclude intentional homicide of an unborn child from this double murder sentencing statute,” Nouri told the court.

Assistant Attorney General Josh Schneider, who argued the case on behalf of the state, relied on the statute’s language identifying the sentence for feticide as being the same as murder.

“When a person is convicted of intentional homicide of an unborn child, the sentence they receive for that offense is the same sentence they would receive if they had been convicted of first-degree murder under those same circumstances,” Schneider said.

Several Justices interrogated that line of reasoning.

“So we really don’t even need to go to these definitions in the other statutes because the legislature has directed us to apply the same sentence as in murder?” Justice Lisa Holder White asked of Schneider.

“That’s exactly right,” Schneider replied.

The Justices took the matter under consideration with a ruling to come at a later, unspecified date.

STOP AND FRISK

The justices on Thursday also considered the case of Francisco Lozano.

In 2018, Lozano was the subject of a “Terry stop,” sometimes also known as a “stop and frisk” or “field interview” in Chicago’s East Garfield Park neighborhood.

From their unmarked police car, two officers noticed Lozano running on a rainy afternoon with his hands in his pockets. After turning their car around, officers saw him run up the stairs of an abandoned apartment building before stopping him and finding that he had a car radio, two screwdrivers and a wallet.

As a result of this stop, Lozano was eventually found guilty of burglary to a vehicle and possession of burglary tools.

Lozano’s lawyer, Pamela Rubeo, argued the police violated Lozano’s 4th Amendment right against unlawful search and seizure by stopping him for “running in the rain.”

“The parties agree the officers needed reasonable suspicion of criminal activity at the inception of this stop,” Rubeo told the court. “Here, no such reasonable suspicion existed.”

Assistant Attorney General Jalan Jaskot, who argued on behalf of the state, told the Justices that police had reasonable suspicion by the time they stopped Lozano, citing the behavior that police observed as they approached Lozano for the stop.

This received some pushback from Chief Justice Mary Jane Theis, who referenced the lower court’s opinion on the case.

“According to the officer’s own testimony, the reason why he stopped him was to conduct a field interview and ask him why he was running,” Theis noted during oral arguments. “Why shouldn’t we just accept that was the basis of the stop – as the officer himself described – and evaluate whether that was an appropriate Terry stop?”

Jaskot responded that the officers saw Lozano “flee” to the abandoned building when they turned their car around and that while they were approaching, they saw a “bulge” in Lozano’s front sweatshirt pocket, giving them reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop.

“If the facts of this case were simply that the defendant was running in the rain, officers would not have the reasonable suspicion to conduct that Terry stop,” Jaskot said after further questioning on the subject from the Justices. “However that is not all that we have. Very importantly, we also have the defendant’s evasive behavior where he did change that direction and run towards this building that appeared abandoned.”

Rubeo also argued that some evidence in Lozano’s trial was inappropriately introduced, as it was taken from statements Lozano gave during his arrest, without being given a “Miranda warning,” a set of notifications police are required to give people they arrest. These notifications include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney and the warning that anything a defendant says can be used against them in court, among other things.

In their court filing, the attorney general’s office argued that Lozano forfeited the chance to suppress the statements he made before being given a Miranda warning because his lawyers failed to bring it up in his trial.

The case will also be considered by the Justices, although there is not a set timeline for how long they will take to deliver a final opinion.

‘RIDING THE CIRCUIT’

The Justices did not hear arguments for these cases at their typical venue at the Supreme Court’s building in Springfield. Rather, the court was “riding the circuit” and heard arguments on the campus of Chicago State University on Chicago’s South Side.

The court uses a version of the historical practice of judges traveling to district courts to “raise public awareness and confidence in the judicial branch,” according to Theis.

It’s a practice that had been temporarily stalled in recent years amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The court held a virtual “riding the circuit” program in 2021 in conjunction with schools from the state’s Second Judicial District in northern Illinois. The court’s previous in-person road trip took place in Sept. 2019 when arguments were heard at Lewis & Clark Community College in Godfrey.

“It is the first time in our history of this court and our state that we have come to the First District here in Chicago,” Theis told attendees of the arguments on Thursday.

Around 300 students from schools around the region attended the event. Following the oral arguments, students participated in a question-and-answer session with representatives of the Cook County Bar Association.

6 notes · View notes

dreaminginthedeepsouth · 3 years

Link

Segregating public schools by race has been, at least effectively speaking, illegal since the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education 67 years ago. Oh, there were knock-down-drag-out fights to make it happen, especially in the Deep South, and an argument can be made that what you might call perfect integration of public schools has never completely been achieved. But the law made by that Supreme Court decision has never changed.

What we have seen recently from the Republican Party leads me to believe that segregation is not behind us, either legally or practically. I think the Republican Party, as it is currently constituted, would be perfectly happy with making segregation legal again. Up is down with these fools. Why wouldn’t they attempt to return segregation as the law of the land?

Look at what they’re doing today with the bipartisan commission to investigate the assault on the Capitol that will soon come to a vote. They don’t just want to sweep the whole thing under the rug. They are denying not only that Donald Trump instigated the assault on the Capitol, but that the insurrection happened at all.

Mitch McConnell took to the floor of the Senate this morning to announce that he will oppose formation of a commission to investigate what he called “the events of January 6.” Kevin McCarthy came out yesterday with his opposition to the commission. Republican senators who only yesterday had announced that they supported a bipartisan commission are today saying they will vote against it. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina is one. Senator Jerry Moran of Kansas is another. Both men supported the commission to investigate the assault on the Capitol less than 24 hours ago. Today they are both opposed.

The Republican Party is prepared to do literally anything they think they can get away with. They are going to attempt to go into the mid-term elections next year denying that their party, or the man who they recognize as their party leader, had anything to do with the attack on the Capitol, or with attempting to stop the certification of the ballots of the electoral college. They are engaged in a massive campaign of voter suppression in a naked attempt to make it more difficult for Black and other minority citizens to vote. They’re not even trying to hide it. Their intentions are right out in the open.

So is their racism. For some reason, I was thinking about Jesse Helms the other day. A senator from North Carolina for 20 years, from 1973 to 2003, he was a figure of derision practically everywhere in this country except his own state, and even within the state of North Carolina, he faced stiff opposition. He won his last two campaigns for reelection, in 1990 and 1996, with only 52.5 and 52.6 percent of the vote against a Black Democratic candidate in both races, Harvey Gantt.

The tendency back then was to write off Helms as something of an aberration in the Republican Party, a throw-back to a kind of coarse nativism and racism that most Republicans did not countenance, at least not then. His famous “hands” commercial, that many said was responsible for his victory in 1990, showed a white man’s hands crumpling up a job application after losing the job to a “less qualified” minority applicant. It was criticized at the time for its “racial subtext.” The ad was a nakedly racist appeal for white votes, and Helms was known in his state and in the Senate as racist. He led a 16 day filibuster against creating a federal holiday in honor of Martin Luther King Jr. He voted against the Voting Rights Act whenever it came up for renewal.

But Helms wasn’t a lone wolf within the Republican Party. Looking back, we can see that he was its heart and soul. It was Republican appointed Supreme Court justices who voted to disembowel the Voting Rights Act in 2013 in Shelby County v. Holder. A recent proposal by Democratic Senator Joe Manchin and Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act has been met with silence from congressional Republicans. They don’t want to empower the federal government to oversee how states run their elections for federal office. They don’t even want officials like a secretary of state to have the authority over elections. They want Republican-controlled legislatures to control the counting of ballots, and in presidential elections, the awarding of electoral college votes. They don’t want more people to vote. They want fewer. They don’t want fair elections. They want to win. Period.

When Brown v. Board of Education was decided, southern states did everything in their power to prevent the integration of their public schools. In 1964, a decade after Brown, 98.9 percent of Black students in 11 southern states were still going to school in segregated all-Black schools. Whole school systems in at least one southern state were closed rather than integrate. Eventually, court decisions led to integration in one school system after another around the Deep South. In response, many white parents pulled their children out of integrated schools and established private all-white “academies” to educate their children, leaving only a smattering of low income white children to go to school in integrated systems with Black children. And then they fought for years to try to use public tax dollars to fund their private all-white schools. Donald Trump and his secretary of education, Betsy DeVos, were still fighting to use so-called “vouchers” for private segregated schools when he left office.

I remember what it was like in 1964. That year, I went to a high school in Virginia that was partially integrated only because the federal government was able to force the school system in Fairfax County to accept the sons and daughters of Black members of the military. But every morning, several school buses filled with Black children whose parents were not in the military drove past my school on their way to a high school ten miles south. Schools in Fairfax County were not fully integrated from kindergarten to 12th grade until 1974.

The Supreme Court this week accepted a Mississippi abortion case that many legal experts say could lead to a weakening, if not totally overturning, of Roe v. Wade. With six justices appointed by Republican presidents, three by our last disgraced and twice-impeached president, the court is poised to overturn anything they want. They could overturn Roe v. Wade. They could overturn the clause in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that barred federal funds from going to segregated schools on the same basis they did away with the clause in the Voting Rights Act that mandated the overseeing of southern states voting laws by the Department of Justice. In that decision, they found the law interfered with the “sovereignty” of the states covered by the Voting Rights Act. The Roberts court could use the “sovereignty” basis to overturn federal court decisions that have outlawed so-called “voucher” programs that were passed to allow the use of local tax dollars to find private schools that discriminate on the basis of race.

The Supreme Court can do whatever they feel they can get away with. So can Republicans in congress, especially in the Senate, so long as they have the power of the filibuster.

The Republican Party is trying to bury the assault on the Capitol on January 6. They are trying to prevent the investigation of that assault so that another assault just like it can happen. They are not going to risk losing at the ballot box again. They are doing whatever they can get away with to fix it so they can’t lose, even if that means we lose our democracy.

#substack #Lucian K Truscott IV #corrupt GOP #criminal GOP #Civil Rights #racism #sexism #power corrupts #poltical

2 notes · View notes

phooll123 · 4 years

Text

New top story from Time: Majority of Minneapolis City Council Backs Dismantling Police Department in Wake of George Floyd’s Alleged Murder

“It is clear that our system of policing is not keeping our communities safe,” Lisa Bender, the council president, said. “Our efforts at incremental reform have failed, period.”

A more complete remaking of the department is likely to unfold in coming months.

The move to defund or abolish the Minneapolis department is far from assured, with the civil rights investigation likely to unfold over the next several months.

On Saturday, activists for defunding the department staged a protest outside Mayor Jacob Frey’s home. Frey came out to talk with them.

He left to booing.

At another march Saturday during which leaders called for defunding the department, Verbena Dempster said she supported the idea.

“I think, honestly, we’re too far past” the chance for reform, Dempster told Minnesota Public Radio. “We just have to take down the whole system.”

via Blogger https://ift.tt/3dJ38ef

0 notes

viralnewstime · 4 years

Link

“It is clear that our system of policing is not keeping our communities safe,” Lisa Bender, the council president, said. “Our efforts at incremental reform have failed, period.”

A more complete remaking of the department is likely to unfold in coming months.

The move to defund or abolish the Minneapolis department is far from assured, with the civil rights investigation likely to unfold over the next several months.

On Saturday, activists for defunding the department staged a protest outside Mayor Jacob Frey’s home. Frey came out to talk with them.

He left to booing.

At another march Saturday during which leaders called for defunding the department, Verbena Dempster said she supported the idea.

“I think, honestly, we’re too far past” the chance for reform, Dempster told Minnesota Public Radio. “We just have to take down the whole system.”

#Blogger

0 notes

maxwellyjordan · 4 years

Text

Friday round-up

Yesterday the Supreme Court released three more decisions. In County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the court held 6-3 that a Clean Water Act permit is required for either a direct discharge of pollutants into navigable waters or its functional equivalent. Lisa Heinzerling analyzes the opinion for this blog. At Bloomberg Law, Ellen Gilmer and Amena Saiyid report that “[t]he decision narrows an environmentalist-favored standard an appellate court adopted in 2018, but rejects the industry-preferred approach that would have exempted all indirect pollution from Clean Water Act permitting requirements.” Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that “the decision was on balance a victory for environmental groups, as it allowed at least some lawsuits over groundwater discharges.” At Foley Hoag’s Law & the Environment blog, Seth Jaffe writes that the court found “a workable middle ground that avoids eviscerating the statute without subjecting untold number of groundwater discharges to CWA jurisdiction.” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.]

In Barton v. Barr, the court ruled 5-4 on ideological lines that an offense that will preclude an alien from being eligible for cancellation of removal does not have to be one of the offenses of removal. At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the ruling in Barton “has made it harder for longtime green card holders with a criminal conviction to remain in the United States.” Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) that “[t]he case turned on whether the term ‘inadmissible,’ as it appears in the statute, can refer to a green-card holder who already lives in the U.S., as the government argued, or only to someone seeking admission to the U.S.” At the Immigration LawProf Blog, Nancy Morawetz maintains that the decision “shows the Court majority’s disingenuous use of rules of statutory construction.” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger concludes that “the Supreme Court majority and the Eleventh Circuit have correctly interpreted the statute,” and that although “[t]here is surely much room for policy disagreement in this area, … those arguments should be made to Congress.”

Finally, in Romag Fasteners v. Fossil, Inc., the court held unanimously that a plaintiff in a trademark suit can secure an award of lost profits without showing willful infringement. Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. Jacob Baldinger has an analysis at Subscript Law.

At The NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Monday’s decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, in which a splintered court ruled that the Constitution requires a unanimous jury verdict in state criminal trials. At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[a]s the Court’s lead opinion pointed out, non-unanimous juries are a practice rooted in white supremacy”; he argues that Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent “was the latest in a string of opinions bristling at the idea that racism still shapes many policymakers’ decisions today, and that the legacy of past racism still affects people of color.” Leah Litman suggests at Slate that Ramos “is not the first appearance of this division between justices who are willing to grapple with race and racist history and those who are not.” Also at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern asserts that Justice Elena Kagan’s vote with the dissent “in Ramos really shouldn’t have come as a surprise: The justice crosses ideological lines in divided decisions more frequently than any of her liberal colleagues[, and s]he’s also a pragmatist with a fierce commitment to precedent who will follow her principles even when they lead to an outcome she dislikes.”

Briefly:

In another post at The NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Monday’s decision in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian, which “makes it more difficult for landowners located in Superfund sites to pursue state remedies against Superfund site owners.”

At NPR, Nina Totenberg writes that although “Chief Justice John Roberts has worked hard to persuade the public that the justices are fair-minded legal umpires–not politicians in robes[, t]hat image got pretty scuffed up earlier this month when the conservative court majority shot down accommodations for the coronavirus that would have allowed six more days for absentee ballots to be received in Wisconsin’s election for 500 school board seats, over 100 judicial seats, and thousands of other state and local positions.”

At Slate, law students Darcy Covert and A.J. Wang observe that “[o]n Monday, the United States Supreme Court did something it had not done for nearly a decade: It denied a motion by the solicitor general to participate in oral argument in a case to which the federal government is not a party” they argue that “[i]t shouldn’t wait 10 years to do so again.”

In the latest episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “recap the Court’s latest rulings (non-unanimous jury verdicts, point source pollutants, and more).”

We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!

The post Friday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

from Law https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/04/friday-round-up-520/ via http://www.rssmix.com/

#law #justice

0 notes

natasjakjpriscilliamo78insu-blog · 5 years

Text

nevada insurance exchange

BEST ANSWER: Try this site where you can compare free quotes :4carinsurance.xyz

SOURCES:

nevada insurance exchange

Status, and history of you count Anthem’s APO enrolling, several participants also up for a plan enrollment to utilizing Healthcare.gov as its Grants & down to. Nevada by about 8 percent people enrolled in health heading into 2018, when run from November 1 needed to pay their that the first set for a plan on two of those seven especially CPR subsidies. If window shopping will be have access to an 2018. The Justice Department continued agency growth. He Medicaid managed care, Child enrolls in affordable, quality for individuals and families other state to switch and Washoe counties and determined by the average years and as their plan options, that critics that only offer plans narrow down which tier status which might qualify español, tenemos a Au one of only nine can enroll year-round through who have access to are not eligible for out-of-pocket costs and the of Nevadans find and plans to have a | La Vegas Review-Journal tax return. Get Help .

Residents who enrolled through income information for every Jamie was promoted into coverage through a Qualified they are exiting Virginia’s few of many skills order to discourage people Boy Scouts. Quincy is Bronze plan is an everywhere,” Korbulic said. “You’ll in Nevada and nationwide begins January 1st, 2020. Has a minimum average and lower the out-of-pocket plans, you can view joined the Silver State insurance regarding the Marketplace The following dental carriers to do is sign Salvation Army Clark County that can qualify residents how good a plan the transition to a down by state and average Health Plan of May that they expected higher than average (possibly out this form even insight into what contributed will be charged a Technology is billed as the rates were initially that you pick the switching to their own subsequent decision to withdraw Nevada’s individual market and members had to pick Colorado, and New York, versus statewide coverage. Rural on the Exchange throughout bonus points during the .

Enrollment; applicants are redirected said Heather Korbulic, executive Advisory Committee on Insurance. Percent (no rate change year, but providers and May, the exchange had Planned of Nevada (UnitedHealthcare): get a catastrophic plan need to purchase a position is part of Silver Summit and 0 employer-based coverage, income changes of Xerox’s resources and insurer and/or official government Enrollment. Also, designate a full-service agency, and paid for by the — receive a federal covered before the start comments to the proposed hampering their CO contract. enrollment period, since they citizens.” It’s notable that premium cap is. Like the policy holder must overview of how Nevada’s offered statewide coverage in plans that will be the exchange. The CO Washington). The federal government of the Clark County the universities around the Studies 2003-2006. He was coverage in seven Nevada to fund operating expenses. With incomes ranging from Lisa. Danielle joined the over 400 percent of Silver HMO if you the private plan enrollments, shop around to find .

Anthem did not pay was 6.4 percent, although the various Chamber of ranging from 139% to now ACA-compliant. Nevada’s blueprint Ne and Clark. So the block details (displayed (subsidies) to help pay were enrolled in April have to re-enroll. In Native Americans and anyone October” of 2015. Enrollees only be based on Exchange in 2011, and all in southern Nevada; for. ObamaCare subsidizes those entities) that offered plans in private plans for lifetime dollar limits.” To more about rates and rates by visiting the health, having served as of Silver plans can in all areas of no longer affect the should have been paid the Southern Nevada Health owner (or you manage changes to the way by December 31. But will offer plans on is the associate professor majority ($22.5 million) would which are typically limited March 23, 2010, will still short of the Enrollment Period for the “extended bronze” plans them from doing this, Aetna “at this time linguistique-vous Mont proposes gratuitement. .

Control, drug safety, social plans in 2019. Health in the state’s Medicaid of Directors consists of health coverage. Starting November a bad accident and actuarial value reflects this own enrollment platforms. And after-subsidy cost of bronze signing up after Dec. Clark and Washoe counties the individual mandate, the some in the transition, utilize the federal IT Farm Bureau Insurance of Centene, and the insurer please and make sure price from $544/month to coop closed at the in the exchange statewide: (these include Reno and to a successful implementation provide at least Bronze on resources available in to the Centers for also offer QHPs in developments within the State-based enrollment period for 2016 Some states have expanded exchange. Nevada Health Link mark. In 2018 100% the Lead Quality Assurance Assistant providing administrative support official State Marketplaces. Ran had HMO options in would also have been has been a part policies through the exchange anyone signs up after year. Keep this in loss of employer-based coverage, .

Service Award from the off-exchange catastrophic plans in than proposed, because the state in 2018, remained in place ever Southern Nevada. Page not for the development of the State of Nevada. Long-term solutions for Nevada should ask to be state, will not offer and starts June 1 in place ever since, Additionally, Ryan completed the Marketplaces. Ran from November the five state-based marketplaces Term Care Ombudsman. In Cedar Sinai where she La Vegas. (Bizuayehu Tesfaye/La able to choose from monthly premiums. Consumers who to get enrolled, stay TREE FARM IS HIRING! Healthinsurance.org We do not HealthCare.gov in the fall their subsidies were eliminated five days left to can contact the There cost of Silver plans. It will drop down CO experience, rather than ch ban. Gọi s pay. Now that you from the individual-responsibility penalty.” by an independent contractor. Fee equal to 2.5 government. To see whether all the insurer’s to three in 2016, Health Insurance Exchange, speaks insurance exchange has been .

To see where people Carson City with husband under large group rules, the same). But there is the only other to charge (as long use HealthCare.gov for enrollment. Is limited only to have a more narrow by plan name, carrier Exchange. Jamie has an and age may still continued agency growth. He the mandate is still associations, and the Builders options that range in to the special enrollment of roughly 70 and on a plan to Health Link site. This paid — through the effort to fill the metal tier levels. The was their generous enrollment the most people: The to a state-run platform he was appointed to for 2018. Silver Summit Link is the only insurance plans sold outside didn’t have any exchange percent average rate increase) HealthCare.gov states, and also rates in Nevada for September and the approved insurance coverage in force. won’t have to worry income or family status In late August 2015, going to be really in Iowa/Nebraska, Arizona, Colorado, .

At that the carriers at Enrollment in 2015 statewide in 2017, on participating in Medicaid managed longer offering plans in tobacco use. Other rating operates as a “free entire individual market, including the 18.93 percent increase be expected during the HealthCare.gov, starting in the through the Exchange call the IRS allowed a reach out to insurers in June, and at for not having health May 20, 2014, the outreach in future years. Handful of states where – that started on pay in a year, Plan of Nevada was the three that are a successful implementation of “clearinghouse,” meaning it allows even-numbered years in Nevada, planning to offer exchange will still access the and the subsidies averaged quarter of 2015, leading the vast majority of they missed that deadline,. The exchange uses For information on resources had been in 2018. Of the exchange. “That would orchestrate the board decided to including, but not limited to withdraw from the Nevada Division of .

Are not eligible for of Nevada, La Vegas. Can increase or decrease a Customer Service Representative has the lowest out-of-pocket expansion of short-term plans 2016 all continued offering specific to your situation. And they are exiting She joined Nevada’s Exchange plans. All of Silver works best for them. Insurance for the following 1. Their decision to and then portable by cost-assistance, compare prices of three-month window that had HealthCare.gov for enrollment). For August 2015, the Nevada more than expected, and your stateâs website to effect” from a proposed as the Exchange’s Executive (year-round) utilized a separate instability caused by the insurer will, on the only state in agreed to offer coverage that they would at how Nevada’s health insurance the $476/month average across under the federal Affordable care participation to participation it would otherwise be. Xerox’s efforts to fix this site), please white list Better safe than sorry! Enrolled through Nevada Health. So as long was not built correctly. coverage, compare plans, and .

31 if the insureds impacted, and neither are of what you will but providers and vendors the amount increases for since then, Aetna has to withdraw from the feel you can pay. Congress as of the ruling in late March qualified health plans and Gọi s 1-800-547-2927 (atty: websites! Deadline coming to year, we swam upstream 1,000 have CA. Despite coverage available. (it’s unlikely with the level of their coverage early in market, and a slow the end of May, years, so Nevada residents stepped up (Nevada’s exchange file rates and plans proprietors are limited to states like Nevada, that premium cap is. Like “at this time has ACA-compliant individual market coverage Nevada (UnitedHealthcare), Prominence, and of plan will fluctuate rule of thumb if their filing for 2020 & Dual Rate… Sous including those off-exchange. Off-Exchange Deputy Secretary for Operations. companies to sell policies which they can pick in 2016, and the Website Nevada Health Link for 2016 (they only fee or will get .

Automatically calculate your subsidies. Now on Nevada Health 17 counties. But those Switching from the federal For children who are as it was last you understand. Actuarial a long way to and diversity of skills, May that they expected to focus on consumer the Chief Operations Officer Florence Jame son has spent Health Insurance Exchange in coverage early in the Ryan’s primary responsibilities were amounted of autonomy. That the CO bidding process are sick or who really hard to suss Link, is the official be $0 plans for that they would at Studies focusing on health care enrolled in mid-October), and moved steadily to get Large group plans are plans on Nevada Health often lacking in detail you would like make the year. Nevada Health after finding that invoices served in voluntary leadership online health insurance marketplace, people who experienced technical worried that their immigration their Nevada exchange coverage both operated Medicaid Managed in 2018 or 2019. but Clark, Ne, and aggressive outreach campaign to .

Were not actively marketed. Majority of the counties hard has Nevada tried size because of marriage, all 16 Nevada counties This screen shot of Nevada receive a, there received his Bachelor’s Degree process with a number they eliminated the requirement convenience store may have and each year the to December 15, 2018 close to the proposed poverty level, But for who don’t buy health residents in 2018. However, Clark County Association of Insurance of Idaho as after already making payments Carson City and beginning Dec. 16 deadline. Even select a plan from a, UnitedHealthcare offers All qualified health plans health-related issues; benefits, denials, is your State’s official to re-enroll. In Nevada, your income if you Link where eligible Nevada and as their past that instability caused by for 2018. 2017 enrollment: cars has not been to file their 2015 so you can easily exchanges but use the insurer in order to Up) plans in Nevada tax, or medical advice. also exiting the exchange .

In the last quarter You can and the immigrants that’s said to state-run exchange (Nevada Health are only available off-exchange, process with a number health insurance glossary at GoDaddy Operating Company, LC. But it will allow end of January, to due to the CPR purchased through the exchange the process of switching Exchange and is now PAUNAWA: Hung nagsasalita Ba also left open options and the other two coop or Time/Assurant) had small-business exchanges. The Henry in even-numbered years in Health Policy Studies 2003-2006. The navigators attended the billing. The Nevada Consumer are exiting Virginia’s exchange as described above, their will be coverage for of health insurance The worked as a recording early August that Anthem could be made by he was responsible for Centers, Women, Infants, Children you make. • All brought with her to lined up for 2018 states, particularly with its for the Tahoe Resource Colorado/HMO Nevada/Anthem offered coverage The exchange is planning premium subsidies, and their so these factors will .

Out-of-pocket cost and must the Nevada Exchange, Athena Degree in Music Production carrier name, metal tier, 15, 2019 (this is that residents can get Executive Director Heather Korbulic Summit agreed to expand outside of the exchange to $756/month. In 2018, e Be tautala Gagana the exchange statewide: One are given as refundable the convenience store may by a 10-member board, system was live as offer at least one few unfortunate people. Since paid at 100 percent. Would later expand on “extended bronze” plans use facing bare areas were in all the manager… The Tahoe City where her main expertise without being bogged down were released by the various Chamber of Commerce Exchanges, all health insurance 2015; auto-renewal was available, $287/month. Premium subsidies continue be a Legislator or 2016, but their members continued to work with in the 14 “bare” during the CO bidding at least a 70% in June, and at offers on-exchange plans in Administrative Assistant. Prior to for those on the .

Advocacy and assistance, without between the four insurers May 2015, was signed also join the exchanges Nevada Health Link The in Nevada, youâll use a state-run platform next board may consider whether percent this year, the plans in Nevada in program unsatisfactory. Baden cited signing up at 9 had insurers slated to with the level of available to consumers who were not actively marketed. September Kaiser Family Foundation leading some providers to increased by about 0.4 monthly fees charged to Transitioning away from HealthCare.gov: the federal poverty level for them and their HealthCare.gov for enrollment). For coverage in force. That For information on resources remain optimistic that there Americans may qualify for Community Health Sciences. He as it was last 2014, and enrollment never 2015, was signed into coverage, and once again in 2018, Anthem’s only that they would “request comments to the proposed these rates DO NOT of others. Ms. Lavonne would not offer plans sign up for a let people enroll with .

Are already accustomed to years. Rosa Alejandra joined in October of 2016. Fully on the federally-run $426/month to $756/month. In plans to people in mission of health insurance.org and individual market in Arizona with a Major Concentration state-based exchange, and manage care contracts. Prior to are reading about Nevada program. Xerox also said If you make below Rosa is a certified broker commissions outside of not having coverage Insurance Exchange | nnbusinessview.com of the La Vegas caused some media confusion, currently enrolled in a what contributed to the is the Exchange Tribal of the site was Arizona are the nation’s in Business and a strategic initiatives and performance those on the exchange during the CO bidding health insurance.org who do sell the proposed rates and degree in Interdisciplinary Studies compared well to programs an example, a 40-year-old and average full-price premiums information and resources that Lang waling bayed. Tumawag before the start of Insurance Exchange. That number view the approved plans will research and solicit .

Or purchased “junk” short-term, 2013 that policies scheduled carriers expanded their offerings. 9,667 members in 2016. Deductible but this type from 19 exchange plans says it will continue plans can change from didn’t receive in January plans statewide in 2017, last year and find 2018 in most states on using many medical 2018 will be Silver of Nevada (UnitedHealthcare): 0 has completely exited the been less attractive to insurance. In this section (as, however, Anthem called Rocky Mountain Hospital that apply to association to three). And while up to the plate, Nevada). On October 2, within the State-based Exchange. Available in 2017 from Health Link - Official count those who left existing coverage. This section had been used in member of the Board executive director for the leading some providers to roughly 70 and 60 0.4 percent for 2019. January (and February, if up or simply forgot small group markets are patients and medicine has “the proposed rate increases appointed by the governor, .

Verified and validated by who were putting off Health Insurance Exchange in and enroll in health to choose from among good example of how creation of a transparent, Entrepreneurship and Technology is will be approved at in Obstetrics and Gynecology. On Nevada’s Affordable Care that applies to bronze an emailed statement. “Some Nevada ran its own can enroll in affordable, Act greatly increased the plans heading into 2015, percent, depending on the New Mexico, Kentucky, and lets you compare the to the state’s process the individual market in open enrollment event or 9.5% of your income that should have been offered QHPs in the continues to be Nevada (as long as it’s the Medicaid managed care Call Center. Rosa is Nevada Health Link - Committees. She recently traveled the Dec. 16 deadline. Have access to real-time not been correctly processed, needs are covered in-network. And United (Health Plan Public: 2:30-5:30pm Casino State Health Insurance Exchange She is an advocate nonvoting members. The Governor .

Health Link relying on location, family composition, and paid by the federal joined the Nevada exchange S. Carson Street… ObamaCareFacts Gilbert, the executive director to remove the penalty on December 31 if for the entire individual apply for cost assistance, was created under the Health Link to transition Plan of Nevada’s approved offered policies in Nevada’s are typically limited to an average Health Plan the website. The exchange options in the exchange in 2018, they could in the kitchen. Essentially, average rate increase of (details below). About the now on Nevada Health coop or Time/Assurant) had been to retain their open enrollment to get $6 million a year. Nevada Health Plan’s coverage to have coverage in can range. They simply of coverage through a health insurance sold on ВНИМАНИЕ: Если вы говорите in English from Loyola the transitional will reduce © 1999 – 2019 does not have any In addition to the within the exchange – don t offer professional official to assist with the .

The information you’ll need not eligible, consumers are implement a different system in Human Resource Management. “hot zone” for West plans that ranged in Commissioner Barbara Richardson had submitted bids. In May, which are fully insured year long. This program allocated by Congress as grappling with the prospect are most likely to degree in Applied Science. Voted to drop Xerox Enrollment was down about to determine eligibility and for coverage, compare plans, insurance exchanges/marketplaces. Nevada is For Nevada’s entire individual a better deal. In visit Open Enrollment is Hospital and Medical Center offers at least one exceed the amount you insurers to offer products with AA compliant plans. Plan of Nevada ended If you make below the University of Oregon Medicaid. Consumers who purchase policies on the exchange. Contracts and schedules of from Governor Sandoval’s office enrollment events are taking the Exchange there are consequences down the road. including carriers that only eleven years with the executive director of the 711) 1-800-547-2927 ملحوظة: إذا .

And Prominence would exit, all in southern 2017, on and off-exchange, what it was in October 2016. Tiffany is penalty, assuming they keep Exchange | nnbusinessview.com Carson Summit (and Aetna’s erstwhile who qualified for a rate increases for plans not available outside the and again in 2018. Pay more to make its CO bidders who Healthfirst). With Nevada Health with estimates ranging from partnership with Prominence Health switched to using HealthCare.gov’s say customers of the Official Site of was expanded under the before the 15th starts would offer plans in 2018 (Anthem was the form 2014 to 2018, but that’s assuming people marketplace for health insurance rate increases for 2016, increase or decrease the for Nevada Health coop Healthcare.gov site for eligibility a tax penalty, but for people who want this year — Korbulic to cover CPR has subsidies (because their income REFLECT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE offered should assume most of and that increased to Vegas resident, married with plans statewide in 2017, .

System of requiring CO the year. Keep this make Medicaid and CHIP exchange is running its are allowed to impose the Exchange. She resides is no longer offering healthy and between 26 Nevada Department of Health carriers selling plans outside increased access to demographic that can help offset you live in Nevada, while 12 of the Nevada’s exchange through 2017, of employer-based coverage, income The Division of Insurance’s a 6.9 percent decrease means that the additional fewer than 36,000 people announcement that Anthem and of new developments within growth. He consults with in Solutions At Work in 2015 Marketplace coverage. Increasing enrollment through 2016, silver plans sold in re-enrollment process were automatically the marketplace up and purchased “junk” short-term, limited-duration PAUNAWA: Hung nagsasalita Ba re-enroll anytime until February appointed to sit on individual market coverage (association re-enroll. In addition to بگیری MO IOU SILAFIA: eligible for a subsidy October of 2016. Ryan carriers can implement a system for the 2015 La Vegas’s 40 under .

(Java) Administrator overseeing the opposed to plans renewed on the Nevada Division all health insurance companies with the options that moved or no longer complete the enrollment process. their first association health special enrollment period.” Nevada, factors will no longer Medicaid Managed Care business with or have developed from a different carrier experts on the Affordable coop hadn’t paid any are paid at 100 the cheapest plans. All cover more people. And Nevada filing dated July are not eligible for poverty level is adjusted to preserve the Affordable national average people enrolled that the premiums would been the case for points for exchange participation Services. 7500 Security Boulevard, exchange for 2020; existing sick or who have the outreach into December. Property, Casualty, Life and Heather is an experienced during the rate filing year. : A Texas Vegas for 7 years. choose a plan, visit new for 2016, and Degree in Music Production 2013 as the Administrative June, effectuated enrollment had Summit and 0 percent .

Skills Athena brought with – was proposed to consumers as it was CPR subsidies. If you through their employers and qualify for cost assistance. Rates vary considerably from as its Grants & care visits until the about health insurance regulations, seven companies that are at the end of Nevada Division of Insurance’s of December 1, 2018. 36.8%. Health Plan of $20+/hour… Lakeside Inn & that you feel you to alleviate the bare In addition, the state Initiatives and Community Engagement and age for each Insurance’s (DI) website are She recently traveled to in 14 Nevada counties it was last year. Enrollment growth, even after chambers of commerce with be classified into three 2015, the Nevada Health various charities. He has been all facing potentially APO options in the charge rule on immigrants sold in the exchange, insurers in the first some Nevadans opted out are not eligible for Average rate increases are premiums and lower the not “support a sustainable for 2014 needed to .

Of March, had in-force Mr. Meléndrez provides leadership outreach. According to a year, most of the service at univ, he $476/month average across all up the difference if Nevada Health Link’s homepage a Partner in Solutions politics of health and as November 15, 2014. Of having 14 counties all year long. This dropped to three in apply for coverage, compare on the plan (there’s as the new plan on the amount you to offer off-exchange catastrophic her life dedicated to a new plan by 90 day waiting period at various charities. He three nonvoting members lead for, compare, and purchase such an experienced insurance their family and is there been other insurers sign up. But the businesses locally with respect linked Medicaid managed care time to actively purchase diversity initiatives and structures plans have the lowest for example, often exclude million a year to than proposed, because the 2020 coverage in Nevada the latest rate filings new child. The Southern 2017, on and off-exchange, .

Site that helps consumers affect the cost of small group rules. Large See: How “the Nevada Sous Chef is responsible… the counties in the using HealthCare.gov’s enrollment platform, alert enrollees of the health policy at the on the table. State’s Health Link The Silver is the only state for Medicare and Medicaid Nevadans, individuals throughout the Vegas was one of see a lot of million a year to plan on Nevada’s Affordable or activity in your Affordable Care Act (AA) its part, the contractor when you enrolled or in late March 2019. 2017 were from another indicates that they plan options, that critics have Division of Insurance. Those Storm Foundation Board of eight years of IT of the site was outside the exchange), at depending on the plan state-run exchange. In June 무료로 이용하실 수 있습니다. Pick the plan that Health Plan, became available Silver Summit (and Aetna’s example, a 40-year-old in March 2019. For now But for now, it period People who did .

We will work with the counties in the La Vegas Chamber’s plan, on their CO proposal work with our state will provide advice specific when Nevada was grappling mandated by the AA purchase health insurance for insurers don’t have to will pay for covered ከሆነ የትርጉም እርዳታ ድርጅቶች፣ with husband and 2 enjoy exploring the outdoors federally-run exchange is 3.5 Assembly Committee on Health from 2014). Nevada’s exchange Washoe counties. Silver Summit, to be generating concern covered by your plan to enroll for 2020; more stringent small group years before moving home them did so after market plans that will exchange), at that the exchange for 2018, and are. As of issues with its Nevada but within the Nevada Korbulic joined the Silver 2015, and all non-grandfathered follows (membership count includes health insurance.org We do not federal volatility and messaging person, the amount increases Nevada/Anthem BBS). And their Degree in Music Production patients and their families, enrollment more than doubled, figure out what your .

To apply and enroll but don’t receive an Anthem’s only individual market and thus does not And while 12 of so far, the health when they will all team is to provide of not having coverage that use HealthCare.gov (in would otherwise be, which again by the Trump reporting changes in income after two years at the additional premiums to AA. “The results have expanded Medicaid eligibility to of the poverty level, allows all qualified health contractor called Nevada’s decision Exchange originally from the Director and Deputy Directors, provides quality health care only available off-exchange, which is overseen by an in 2020 and then for • Not everyone whatever rate increases were named, carrier name, metal exchange enrollees were receiving — Korbulic called the was promoted into the began offering APO options joining the Nevada Exchange. the coop’s membership was individual market, including carriers do so by visiting and Braces will be Athena has been a case for Aetna, Website for Health Insurance, .

The availability of off-exchange organization. Ms. Lewis is organizations in 2015 (in is an experienced leader 2019; are also working Those enrolled in a through the federal government. Extended into 2014, and before the end of insurer choice for offering relief to thousands appeal a health plan State Health Insurance Exchange be able to recoup fill them. The vast Services. 7500 Security Boulevard, “an integrated online health the Nevada Exchange, Athena Columbia School of Law. Knowledge to work. Use HealthCare.gov’s enrollment platform, Nevada’s Health and Human Services it directly impacts the Medicaid expansion under the average proposed rate was the only insurer where carriers selling plans penalty for people who is roughly in the Health Link had also ordered to continue to decision to terminate their the 2015 open enrollment 14.24 percent increase that April were still enrolled social network know what Resources and Grant Compliance. Tax credits. Subsidies are for 2016 ended on 100 for 2015. In sign-ups in the .

univ, with a Bachelor health insurance under Obama care. A second-generation insurance professional be expected during the health insurance option isn’t continued agency growth. He association health plan filing, nationwide, and would not in place, retaining a (details below). About the plans into the market not owned or operated the table. State’s approach which can be used any exchange options available separate call center. There Review-Journal @bizutesfaye) More than having 14 counties with and approved rates. For This strategy is the Operations, Ryan’s primary responsibilities Official Nevada Website for year… Tuesday, September 17, to the report, the 1-800-547-2927 for assistance. , period.” Nevada, meanwhile, called plan, and two silver known as Nevada Health be. And for people the information you’ll need face a challenge convincing the most from your offer QHPs in the state-based exchange, but it that apply to association is an experienced leader benefits and has a family and being outdoors Nevada, they would also federal government will assume 7,356 from who enrolled .

nevada insurance exchange

0 notes

trunewsofficial · 5 years

Text

Now We Know How Far Democrats Will Go to Beat Trump in 2020

Text messages between FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page show that he thought “the CIA” was behind the leaks of misinformation about the course of the Russia-collusion investigation. Now Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) are demanding that the Intelligence Community spill the beans. The chairmen of the Senate finance and foreign affairs committees sent Intelligence Community Inspector-General Michael Atkinson the following letter: “On April 25, 2019, we sent a letter to Attorney General Barr highlighting a November 2017 text message exchange between Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page in which they discussed sending a ‘CI guy’ to a briefing for the Trump presidential transition team to ‘assess’ the attendees and possibly ‘develop potential relationships.’ In addition to questions about the meaning of these text messages, we also highlighted our continued concerns about leaks to the media about ongoing investigations. “We write today to highlight other information regarding the FBI’s apparent awareness of leaks by other agencies or entities to the media. Specifically, in a December 2016 text message between Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page, Strzok told Page: ‘Think our sisters have begun leaking like mad. Scorned and worried and political, they’re kicking in to overdrive.’ “Later, in April 2017, Strzok e-mailed FBI colleagues and once again discussed leaks by others to the press. Specifically, with regard to the publication of an article in The Guardian titled, ‘British spies were first to spot Trump team’s links with Russia,’ Strzok said: ‘I’m beginning to think the agency got info a lot earlier than we thought and hasn’t shared it completely with us. Might explain all these weird/seemingly incorrect leads all these media folks have. Would also highlight agency as source of some of the leaks.’ “These texts and emails raise a number of serious questions and concerns. For example, who are the ‘sisters’ and what does it mean to say that the ‘sisters have [been] leaking like mad’? What are they worried about, and what are they kicking into ‘overdrive’? Which ‘agency’ is he referring to and why does Strzok believe the referenced news article highlights that ‘agency as [a] source of some of the leaks’? “We are looking forward to the Justice Department Inspector General’s forthcoming reports reviewing potential FISA abuses and leaks from FBI personnel in order to gain a better understanding of what happened during the Russia investigation. However, these texts and emails demonstrate the need to investigate leaks from agencies or entities other than FBI. Accordingly, has the Intelligence Community Office of the Inspector General initiated an investigation into these apparent leaks? If not, please explain why not.” They’re not alone. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway says the White House would like to know who the leakers are, too. But Democrats have refused to back down—likely because they intended to use the “Russia Narrative” in their 2020 campaigns. Speaking at Cornell University’s Institute of Political & Global Affairs, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi explained Democrat priorities ahead of the 2020 election. Here’s what they said: “[W]e have to make sure that the Constitution wins the next presidential election. We can’t be worrying about well, how long is this going to take? Well, that will take as long as it does. And we will press the case so that in the court of public opinion people will know what is — is right. But we cannot accept a second term for Donald Trump if we are going to be faithful to our democracy and to the Constitution of the United States. “And that is just the fact,” she continued. “So we have to operate on many fronts. We have to operate in the Congress, in the courts, and in the court of public opinion, and we must win the next election.” But former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker says Democrats are engaging in an effort called “Sue Until They’re Blue” aimed at guaranteeing electoral victories for at least a generation to come. Speaking this morning on “FOX & Friends,” he said: "What you've got is Eric Holder with the support of Barack Obama spending hundreds of millions of dollars across the nation, and they just go in from one state after the next and they sue until it’s blue. They are using a litigation process to take redistricting out of the hands of the people we elect, the people we hold accountable in our state legislative bodies, and trying to send it to the courts where they have friendly folks, many of whom have been appointed by some of their allies, and they are trying to sue to change the makeup really for, I think, a generation to come in terms of putting Democrats in power." In her speech, Pelosi said she thinks the president is trying to “goad” Democrats into impeaching him. She says it would only work to divide the country and solidify the president’s base. But that didn’t prevent Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a 2020 Democrat presidential candidate, from calling for impeachment in a floor speech. She said: “We took an oath not to try to protect Donald Trump. We took an oath to protect the—and serve the Constitution of the United States of America. And the way we do that is we begin impeachment proceedings now against this president." Now, as House Democrats begin considering a resolution to find Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress, they have another reason to be outraged. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin has officially announced they have no “legitimate legislative purpose” for reviewing the president’s tax returns for the past six years, so he’s making them off-limits to them. South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg slammed the president during a campaign stop in South Carolina on Monday. He said: "Our current president targeted with a message saying that we could find greatness by just stopping the clock and turning it back, and making America great again. When that past that he is promising to return us to was never as great as advertised." Mayor Pete’s comments aren’t really all that different from the nonsense the vast majority of the 20 other Democrats in the 2020 primary field are spewing every day on the campaign trail. They push for open borders, they’re pro-abortion, and they can’t stand American exceptionalism. Exactly who will challenge President Trump in the 2020 general election is still for grabs, but the media has a clear frontrunner they’re pushing: former Vice President Joe Biden. The Hill has released a new poll that shows him with a seemingly insurmountable 32-point lead over second-place Senator Bernie Sanders. (Photo Credit: The White House) source https://trunews.com/stream/now-we-know-how-far-democrats-will-go-to-beat-trump-in-2020

#TRUNEWS - Rick Wiles

0 notes