Tumgik
#Richard Ureña
conlasbasesllenas · 4 years
Text
Peloteros dominicanos donan alimentos en el "Challenge" más solidario
Peloteros dominicanos donan alimentos, en el "Challenge" más solidario. Por Kevin Mora (@kevinmoraf) @mlbdominicana
Los peloteros de la República Dominicana com00enzaron el “reto” o “challenge” más solidario y digno ejemplo a seguir.
La intención de los peloteros es volver viral este “challenge”, el cual consiste en donar alimentos a 10 familias necesitadas y afectadas por la pandemia mundial.
El campocorto dominicano, Richard Ureña, comenzó haciendo un desafío a sus compañeros de profesión los cuales se…
View On WordPress
0 notes
lrmartinjr · 3 years
Link
0 notes
lafamamusic · 3 years
Text
BÉISBOL INVERNAL - Tyler Alexander tiene salida de calidad y Gigantes superan a Toros
BÉISBOL INVERNAL – Tyler Alexander tiene salida de calidad y Gigantes superan a Toros
El zurdo Tyler Alexander tuvo una salida de calidad, lanzando hasta el séptimo. Richard Ureña, Marcell Ozuna y Henry Urrutia sonaron sendos cuadrangulares para llevar a los Gigantes de San Francisco a una victoria 5-4 sobre los Toros del Este, en encuentro celebrado en el estadio Julián Javier, en San Francisco de Macorís. La salida de Alexander fue complementada por Huascar Brazobán quien…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
ericvick · 3 years
Photo
Tumblr media
In which District 4 Candidates stand on concerns
9 candidates for town council have released bids to stand for District 4, an area that mainly incorporates areas of Dorchester and Mattapan, which includes Codman Square, Franklin Subject, 4 Corners, Fields Corner and Bowdoin-Geneva. The seat also includes components of Roslindale and Jamaica Simple. It is currently represented by Councillor Andrea Campbell, whose operate for mayor clears a route for equally veteran campaigners and rising political organizers. 
These who have designed the ballot for the Sept. 14 preliminary are: Joel Richards, Deeqo Jabril, Josette Williams, Troy Smith, Leonard Lee, Brian Worrell, Will Dickerson, Evandro Carvalho, and Jacob Ureña.
JOEL RICHARDS A trainer of 13 yrs at Blackstone Elementary University in the South Stop, he enters the race with a spotlight reel of “practical urgencies” as his priorities  – mitigating website traffic congestion with investments in transit, optimizing school properties for discovering and climate effectiveness, and curbing violence. Richards positions himself as the race’s union prospect, and stated he hopes to leverage his union ties and Fields Corner Key Streets board membership to achieve a two-12 months “total restorative” agenda all-around academic and financial inequities. A regional representative for the Boston Academics Union, he has known as updating the Boston Community Colleges infrastructure “a baseline expectation,” and also expressed assist for a absolutely elected university committee and a circumstance-by-scenario ageing out of BPS learners.  At the moment, all BPS pupils are demanded to unenroll on their 20-2nd birthday, when they can go after a Graduate Equivalency Degree (GED).  A lifelong Dorchester resident, he sees inexpensive housing alternatives as “critical for making generational wealth.” He has proposed an expansion of homeownership lotteries a Home Rule Petition that would reintroduce rent control to Boston a Tenants Proper of To start with Refusal clause, which could give tenants a 6-thirty day period buffer time period to obtain a property from their personal landlord and the implementation of a emptiness tax. Website: moreford4.com ENDORSEMENTS: Boston Teachers Union, Democratic Socialists of The united states Dollars ON HAND: $11,289
JOSETTE WILLIAMS A Dorchester resident and recent inductee into Arise Massachusetts, a political coaching business that recruits Democrat females to run for public place of work, the voting rights advocate embarked on a Studying and Listening tour to kick off her campaign. She has reported about the early phases of campaigning: “Win, drop, or attract, it’s about mobilizing.”  Williams is the system manager for Countdown to Kindergarten, an early childhood development application in the Boston Community Educational facilities system, and is each a graduate of BPS and a BPS dad or mum. She’s a strong proponent of common preschool, and has usually pitched herself as the “children and families candidate: A person who cares about what happens at home.”  A founder member of Very important Village, a prenatal and early childhood development nonprofit that operates out of Boston Healthcare Centre, she advocates for expanded psychological health and fitness means in schools. On general public safety, she argues for a reeducated law enforcement power and a reallocation of Boston Police Department money to mental well being sources. “When Black individuals or battered ladies who’ve suffered sexual assault or domestic violence will need to simply call the law enforcement and do not, that is continued violence. Restoring belief advantages absolutely everyone,” she said.  A single mom and lifelong renter, Williams has emphasized the need for pathways to homeownership, together with producing hire-to-individual parcels and the implementation of a Tenant’s Right to First Refusal provision.  WEBSITE: voteforjosette.com Dollars ON HAND: $17,333
DEEQO JABRIL A Somali refugee and self-identified “candidate for the men and women,” she launched her campaign with the intent to “bring the shared struggles of girls and immigrants to the desk.” This is her second operate for town council she ran to represent District 7 in 2017, but missing to Kim Janey, now the acting mayor. Jabril has referred to as herself the “coalition applicant,” and has designed the focus of her campaign economic resilience and Covid-19 recovery educational prospect and youth development and housing security.  With powerful anecdotes from her grueling abroad journey to the States – having her very first peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwich at a refugee camp in Mombasa – she affirmed that her priorities in the race are aimed at “decriminalizing poverty.”  A proponent of a hybrid school committee and the construction of a new significant college in Mattapan, Jabril, a mother of four, reported there is “not an equally dispersed level of notice offered to the 140 colleges in district 4, and that requires to change.”  She has also termed for enhanced transparency within the BPD while citing her fears that her son, who is Black and Muslim, will have a fatal conversation with the police. Jabril is effective at the Office of Economic Development and owns her tiny business, The African Shopping mall in Roxbury. Her campaign’s flagship financial proposal is a community no-interest loan system of up to $50,000 for tiny firms.  WEBSITE: deeqo.org ENDORSEMENTS: Point out Rep. Liz Malia Hard cash ON HAND: $6,929
EVANDRO CARVALHO A common existence in Dorchester and Massachusetts politics, he has joined the race to grow to be “your neighborhood councillor” and is looking to redefine the this means of a “real progressive.” Carvalho represented the 5th Suffolk district in the Legislature from 2014 to 2019, when he ran for Suffolk County District Legal professional. Numerous areas of District 4 slide inside of the boundaries of his onetime constituency, such as components of wards 14, 15, and 17. “We force for radical modify and thrust the boundaries of what’s regarded as attainable mainly because there will always be sacrifices and compromises down the line,” Carvalho reported. “These aren’t setbacks as extensive as we’re going in the appropriate route.” He has explained his coverage on very affordable housing as a “holistic strategy.”  Carvalho, who immigrated to Boston from Cape Verde at 15 many years previous, has advocated an improve of the Inclusionary Development Coverage (IDP) to 20 per cent from 13 %. The IDP dictates the threshold necessity of reasonably priced housing units in new housing developments.  He has also pushed for elevated reliance on neighborhood and block associations for community security, the advertising of vocational specialized education in Boston Public Universities, and the undertaking of “race-conscious final decision making” on the permitting and awarding of metropolis contracts to tiny corporations.  He presently serves as the executive director of the Boston Human Legal rights Commission.   WEBSITE: evandro4boston.com ENDORSEMENTS: Boston Metropolis Councillor Ricardo Arroyo Funds ON HAND: $22,353
TROY SMITH Born and elevated in Dorchester, he joined the District Four race from the Boston Centers for Youth and Family members agency. The Perkins Community Heart method director has pastored two area churches and has spent the very last two decades in the same way “shepherding” the community’s youthful individuals. “We get ready them, stroll with them, and then we launch them,” he explained, “and that form of accompaniment is one thing this district wants.” A regular attendee at monthly neighborhood meetings held by the BPD’s District B, Smith reported he is “sympathetic to police officers simply because they are our family members, they are youth who have occur by way of the neighborhood centre.” He has pushed for a “restructured” law enforcement spending plan and ongoing sensitivity training for officers.  Along with his working experience budgeting cash for the Perkins, his involvement in local community community forums, he claims, has demonstrated him “the town of Boston has far too quite a few methods to be failing its persons,” and significantly of his plan viewpoint depends on principles of govt transparency and accessibility.  “People will need to experience that they are component of the approach, and people in ability are elected to glance out for other people, not just for them selves or their political preservation,” he claimed. An advocate for vocational specialized programming at the middle and elementary school degree, he claimed he would expand sources for afterschool systems to boost youth engagement and discourage violence.   WEBSITE: votetroydistrict4.com Cash ON HAND: $1,378
WILLIAM DICKERSON Bearing the very same identify as his father, a renowned reverend at Bigger Enjoy Tabernacle Church, Dickerson calls himself a “Son of District 4.” He at this time serves with the Boston Inhabitants Occupation Policy (BRJP) program of the Business office of Financial Development, and he has beforehand been group liaison for the BPD’s District B-3, positions that have affected his marketing campaign priorities: mental wellbeing, economic development, and community basic safety.  Expanding and strengthening soon after-school programs leading Dickerson’s list of educational initiatives, and he believes doing away with limitations of entry for community youth who aspire to sign up for the law enforcement pressure also presents a two-in-a person solution to youth and police violence.  “We must get really serious about equity. We have many youthful, outstanding persons who would excel in legislation enforcement, who’ve grown up in this group, and are common with it. We want to entrust them with our policing, with preserving us harmless,” he explained.  Dickerson is also a proponent of an elected college committee and new college properties. He has also proposed a modified edition of universal transit-fare-totally free community transportation in between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. all through weekdays, as nicely as an growth of youth passes to include things like university learners.  He has acquired a maximum donation of $1,000 from former Boston police commissioner William Gross.  WEBSITE: willfordistrict4.com Dollars ON HAND: $1,600
LEONARD LEE A effectively-known figure in the general public company sector, he joined the race just after a calendar year at the helm of Masking the Group, a cost-free mask and particular protecting products (PPE) distribution program. A METCO university student from the “wrong side of Washington Street,” Lee worked at the Dorchester Neighborhood Services Centre for eleven decades right before serving as Connecticut’s deputy commissioner of general public health and fitness. He later returned home to oversee the Melnea Cass Recreation Advanced in Roxbury, all although preserving a backyard beekeeping passion. His eyesight targets youth violence prevention, with an additional focus on economic development for smaller firms and equitable senior expert services.  He is opposed to severing ties concerning the faculties and the law enforcement whilst acknowledging a need for police reform and advocating for programs that deter younger men and women from obtaining firearms.  “Kids simply cannot discover if they are concerned and academics simply cannot teach if they are scared,” said Lee. “Police shouldn’t be getting into universities, armed service design and style I’m conversing about forming associations with the young children.” He has known as charter colleges “an insult to any parent who pays taxes in the city of Boston,” and states the derelict infrastructure of BPS properties “is almost nothing new” as he pushes for “overdue” direct and asbestos screenings on school campuses in advance of any retrofitting is performed with local climate alter in thoughts “We’ve overlooked some standard troubles that contribute to kids’ wellbeing. Everybody wins if we’re constant with our funding of colleges and courses throughout our community,” he said.   WEBSITE: leonardlee4citycouncil.com ENDORSEMENTS: MBTA transit Law enforcement Main Kenneth Eco-friendly Suffolk County Sheriff Steve Tompkins the developer Richard Taylor Income ON HAND: $29,962
BRIAN WORRELL In tossing his title into the hat for a District 4 seat this businessman and initial-technology American is using his maiden political voyage. The real estate trader and former “METCO kid” has said his precedence is to enable propagate during the district the instructional option that he feels contributed to his accomplishment, and to parlay his encounter with the housing sector to put into action economical housing answers.  While he is the only prospect who has not expressed support for rent command, he is an advocate for all-money housing developments, the repossession and development of vacant loads, and an enhanced emphasis on housing options for senior citizens.  “Fewer folks get displaced as a result of homeownership,” he advised the Reporter, “and it’s significant that the metropolis is generating homeownership a chance for people and producing steady, economical housing accessible to everyone.”  Worrell has put ahead a lot of proposals for a extra equitable Boston Community Colleges method. He is an advocate for common preschool, prolonged school times, task-based studying, expanded wrap-all-around services for unique schooling, retrofitting college buildings for local weather resilience, and a hybrid college committee with two seats for pupil representatives. “District 4 has had the term ‘underserved’ hooked up to it for as extensive as I’ve lived right here, and I’m on the lookout to remove that term from our local community vernacular,” he stated.  Web site: fb.com/VoteWorrell Hard cash ON HAND: $17,463
window.fbAsyncInit = functionality() FB.init( appId: "270847243020841", position: legitimate, cookie: legitimate, xfbml: true, oauth : accurate, channelUrl: "https://www.dotnews.com/fb_social/channel" )
FB.Occasion.subscribe("edge.develop", operate(href, widget) _gaq.thrust(["_trackEvent", "Facebook like", "Drupal", href]) )
(perform() var e = doc.createElement('script') e.async = true e.src = doc.place.protocol + '//join.fb.net/en_US/all.js' doc.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e) ())
0 notes
Tumblr media
Un total de 35 jugadores de las Águilas Cibaeñas han sido incluidos entre los listado de 60 jugadoresque han presentado los equipos de ambas ligas mayores para la apertura de los entrenamientos y definir los roster de apertura y la reserva que mantendrá cada uno para realizar sustituciones. Los Nacionales de Washington y los Rangers de Texas son las dos franquicias con mayor cantidad de aguiluchos en su listado, ambos con cuatro, mientras que Cardenales de San Luis, Mets de New York y Marlins de Maimi, han escogido a tres cada uno. Según el reglamento de la MLB para la temporada 2020, recortada de 60 partidos por la pandemia del COVID-19, de los 60 jugadores inscritos por los equipos, 30 serán elegibles para el día de apertura, mientras que los otros 30 permanecerán en un sitio de entrenamiento alternativo en caso de que sean necesarios. A cada conjunto se le permitirá usar un escuadrón de tres jugadores en cada viaje por carretera. Los jugadores aguiluchos colocados en lista de 60 son los siguientes: LIGA NACIONAL Bravos (1): Huáscar Ynoa (PD). Brewers (1-2): Ronny Rodríguez (IF). Cardinals (2-4): Junior Fernández (PD), Ángel Rondón (PD) y Carlos Martínez (PD). Cubs (2-6): Robel Garcia (IF) y Christopher Morel (IF). Giants (1-7): Wandy Peralta (PZ). Marlins (3-10): Yimi García (PD), José Ureña (PD) y Jonathan Villar IF / OF). Mets (3-13): Dellín Betances (PD), Amed Rosario (IF) y Melky Cabrera (OF). Nationals (4-17): Joan Adón (PD), Wilmer Difó (IF), Luis V. García (IF) y Víctor Robles (OF). Padres (1-18): Dinelson Lamet (PD). Phillies (2-20): Ramón Rosso (PD) y Deivy Grullón (C). Pirates (1-21): Richard Rodríguez (PD). Reds (1-22): Francisco Peña (C). LIGA AMERICANA Angels (2-24): Héctor Yan (PZ y Arismendy Alcántara (INF/OF). Astros (1-25): Framber Valdez (PZ). Mariners (1-26): Yohan Ramírez (PD, Regla 5). Rangers (4-30): Jonathan Hernández (PD), Juan Nicasio (PD), Danny Santana (IF/OF) y Leody Taveras (OF). Tigers (1-31): Gregory Soto (PZ). Twins (2-33): Jorge Alcalá (PD) y Jhoan Durán (PD). White Sox (1-34): Edwin Encarnación (IN/DH) #osnyenlosdeportes #beisbollatinord .#loquepasohoy #lidom #AguilasCibaeñas #mlbdominicanos. #mlb #pasiondeportiva https://www.instagram.com/p/CCGxp5NDrJo/?igshid=1g1vd5d5vxobm
0 notes
capturingmaya · 5 years
Text
Dissertation Topic Ideas:
Idea one: 
Discuss the social impact photography has had on self image. Compare to artists that use the social media contacts as an aesthetic for their work. Richard something uses five photographs from each person he is photographing and re-photographs the subject in the best frame he finds for each subject. He finds this easy as something that is hard to do as a portrait photographer is capture photograph of a person how they would want it to look. So by re-photographing an image already taken he is reproducing the aesthetic. This shows the impact of the way photographs are being taken in this generation not only on the uses of social media but also for artists such as photographers and even editors for example magazines. 
•The impact of representation in food photography. advertisement - Survey? 
Idea two : 
The idea of ethics;  social media and the way people document video suffering abuse murder. People have become numb to suffering. How photojournalist have influence or allowed the public to believe it is justified to photograph or record such devastating moment. Idea of how easy it is for the public to influence or be part of the news. The public has taken over the job of the photojournalist. News outlets depend on The snapshot aesthetic & this has become overly popular almost appraised as people want to be able to use technology to their advantage as it adapts. Justifications of Self-satisfaction with the act is an idea that people feel like they’re doing something even though they are not physically helping. and even then it is not doing anything apart from videoing capturing the event they could have avoiding recording in the first place. Kants idea of deontological ethic can be applied to this area to debate the ethics of allowing your self not to do the morally ‘right’ physical acts. Ethnicity being a trend, homelessness, War, murder, abuse, famine and natural diseases are all examples of subjects photographed that can be argued unethical but have become apart of (society) social norms. 
Incoming Richard Mosee
Engaging a viewer 
Personal intrest 
Stereotype photography 
Current issue: coronavirus/ media outlets
Further ideas: 
•Effects of social media media in general on mental health links to photography in truth. How people see them selves- camera distortion - self image - selfies. •Photojournalist’s / paparazzi photograph people’s lives without authority no laws governing media use publications. 
Photographer/ paparazzi aggravating celebrities to get a reaction to photograph. The fact that the photographer has control over the production of an image (post production) and the narrative behind the subject can be dangerous/ not always what the subject wants - unethical. 
•Camera capabilities in this generation. 
Emmanuel Kant - A photographer to help argue against Ruff’s interpretation of portrait photography is  Emmanuel Kant. His theory of deontological ethics can be applied to question whether or not under a series of rules, the morality of the action itself is right or wrong . However a consequential theory of ethics can be applied as consequentialism is a normative ethical theory. The consequences of an action are all that matters when taking an ethical decision to act. 
Morality is primarily focused on the interests of other people and the idea of deontological constraints.
USEFUL LINKS FOR TOPIC IDEAS. 
https://www.today.com/style/models-skin-conditions-answer-hurtful-questions-powerful-portrait-series-t166568    - insta artist 
https://www.bustle.com/articles/138249-11-people-whove-embraced-the-beauty-of-skin-conditions-that-make-humans-unique-photos    -    black milenials 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/christinecarter/2018/11/23/meet-the-black-millennial-bringing-diversity-to-stock-photography/#290fa174500b    -  11 models embraced the beauty of their skin 
https://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/ethics-101/applying-utilitarianism-are-insider-trading-and-the-bailout-of-gm-ethical/  - Ethics/ consqeuncialism 
http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s10814.pdf - ethics |  Sarah Greenough, Picturing a Collection, Presenting a History. 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Pus9DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA46&lpg=PA46&dq=photographer+that+uses+five+portraits+of+his+subjects+and+photographers+one&source=bl&ots=TlBoXq2Ci-&sig=ACfU3U0gK7WmhOTg9_eJgTNXTD1EurP95g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiTspv1lf3nAhXtQUEAHT8TDgcQ6AEwEHoECA4QAQ#v=onepage&q=photographer%20that%20uses%20five%20portraits%20of%20his%20subjects%20and%20photographers%20one&f=false - Photography Reinvented: The Collection of Robert E. Meyerhoff and Rheda Becker. Contributions by Philip Brookman Andrea Nelson Leslie Ureña Diane Waggoner
https://www.invisionapp.com/inside-design/diverse-stock-photos/  -  statistic about companies here to help minority groups. Representation Matters. CreateHER Stock  Photos 
https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/why-does-ad-industry-keep-making-racist-mistakes/1590498
Summary: 
In both cases for my dissertation topic ideas I would be focusing on the connection between photography and the being; the affects photography can have on a person and they’re opinion to a specific subject. 
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
0 notes
corneliusreignallen · 5 years
Text
The conspiracy theories about the Clintons and Jeffrey Epstein’s death, explained
Tumblr media
A New York state sex offender registry photo of Jeffrey Epstein. | New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
The idea that Bill and Hillary Clinton secretly kill their political enemies has circulated in right-wing fever swamps for decades.
On Wednesday, Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) sent out 23 consecutive tweets whose first letters spelled out a startling claim: EPSTEIN DIDN’T KILL HIMSELF.
Gosar has coyly resisted confirming that he was alleging that hedge fund manager and convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein was murdered. But his tweets were hardly anomalous. Epstein’s death has sparked a ton of conspiracy theorizing, and “Epstein didn’t kill himself” has become a bona fide meme, showing up in signs at college football games and posts by influential pundits like Joe Rogan.
To be clear, the New York City medical examiner has ruled that Epstein died by suicide. A former NYC medical examiner hired by Epstein’s brother has disputed this finding, but that examiner was fired after a long string of errors on his watch, making his word a little untrustworthy.
But that hasn’t stopped prominent individuals, up to and including Donald Trump, from joining in the speculation. The day of Epstein’s death, President Trump retweeted a conservative personality who captioned a video in which he pontificates at length about his theories with “we know who did this” and the hashtags #ClintonBodyCount and #ClintonCrime family. Trump was clearer than Gosar in suggesting who he thought had Epstein killed: Bill and/or Hillary Clinton.
To understand what’s going on here, you don’t just need to know about Epstein’s former friendship with Clinton (or with Trump). You just need to understand the role that allegations of murder by the Clintons have played in right-wing fever swamps since the 1990s, beginning with the suicide of Vince Foster and continuing through to the completely random 2016 murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.
What is the “Clinton Body Count”?
According to a history and debunking first published by Snopes in 1998, the body count meme originated in 1993 with Indianapolis lawyer and militia movement activist Linda Thompson, who compiled a list of 34 people connected to the Clintons who had died and titled it, “The Clinton Body Count: Coincidence or the Kiss of Death?” William Dannemeyer, a notoriously homophobic former Congress member from Orange County, California, picked up the list, trimmed it to 24, and sent it congressional leadership in 1994 as he ran for the US Senate.
Thompson provided — by her own admission — “no direct evidence” that the Clintons were responsible for any of the deaths, and Snopes provides a comprehensive account of all of them, most of which were easily explained heart attacks, plane crashes, or suicides.
The most notable name on the list is Vince Foster, the deputy White House counsel who died by suicide on July 20, 1993. Foster was a colleague of Hillary Clinton’s at the Rose Law firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, and came to Washington, DC, as part of the crew of Arkansas loyalists who joined the Clinton administration. In the job, Foster helped conduct vetting of administration officials and said he felt like he had failed the president when Clinton’s first two picks for attorney general were forced to withdraw because of revelations that they had hired undocumented immigrants.
Foster also became wrapped up in a scandal surrounding the firing of staff in the White House travel office and in legal disputes about access to records about Hillary Clinton’s health care task force, earning him a bevy of harsh Wall Street Journal editorials.
Overwhelmed by these circumstances, and clearly struggling from depression, Foster fatally shot himself. But almost immediately, conservatives jumped on the idea that Foster was murdered. Those fanning the flames included the Journal editorial board, National Review’s Richard Brookhiser, and then-Rep. Dan Burton, who tried to do some amateur ballistics research on the case by shooting a large fruit in his backyard. Reports differ as to whether Burton shot a watermelon, a pumpkin, or a cantaloupe.
Numerous investigations, as my colleague Matt Yglesias explains here, have found that Foster died by suicide. But the eagerness of conservatives, both on the more conspiratorial right and in respectable places like the Journal editorial board (Brookhiser favorably reviewed a book casting doubt on the suicide investigation in the New York Times), to doubt those findings fed the idea of a “Clinton Body Count.” So in the future, when people connected to the Clintons died because of easily understandable causes (like former business partner Jim McDougal’s heart attack death in prison), their deaths became grounds for speculation.
The death of Seth Rich in 2016 was the next major event fueling Clinton Body Count conspiracies. Rich was a 27-year-old Democratic National Committee staffer who was shot in what police believed to be an attempted robbery in DC. But almost as soon as he died, Clinton haters seized on his death and tried to argue that Hillary and/or Bill was responsible. After these rumors began, Julian Assange of Wikileaks gave the conspiracy theorists a motive by hinting that Rich, not Russian hackers, provided WikiLeaks with the DNC’s emails. WikiLeaks then offered a $20,000 reward for information about Rich’s death. The implication was that Rich’s killing was punishment for leaking damaging internal emails.
This conspiracy theory was always absurd; there is copious evidence of Russian hacking, Rich had no access to all of the DNC’s internal emails, and he certainly didn’t have access to all the other information Russia recovered, like Clinton campaign chief John Podesta’s emails. The Rich family would eventually sue Fox News unsuccessfully for its efforts to spread the conspiracy theory.
But for Clinton Body Count conspiracy theorists, the incoherence of the theory in the Rich case was never an impediment. The Rich theory soon became part of the broader QAnon conspiracy theory, which is too byzantine to explain in detail here but which my colleague Jane Coaston summarizes as arguing that “special counsel Robert Mueller and President Donald Trump are working together to expose thousands of cannibalistic pedophiles hidden in plain sight (including Hillary Clinton and actor Tom Hanks).” Obviously, the victims of Clinton’s cannibalistic pedophilia would be additions to the body count.
How this fits in with Epstein
The Foster, Rich, and QAnon allegations are clearly absurd. And, we should be very clear, there is no firm evidence at this juncture to suggest that Epstein was murdered, let alone murdered by people with ties to the Clinton.
Epstein did have very real ties to Bill Clinton. That does not mean that Clinton had anything to do with his death, any more than allegations that Donald Trump raped a 13-year-old girl while hanging out with Epstein mean that Trump had something to do with Epstein’s death.
My colleague Andrew Prokop summarized Clinton’s interactions with Epstein thusly:
According to the Daily Beast’s Emily Shugerman, Epstein visited the White House for a donor event during Bill Clinton’s presidency and met with a White House aide several times there. Shugerman also unearthed a 1995 letter from businesswoman Lynn Forester in which she said she enjoyed briefly meeting Clinton at a recent event and used her “fifteen seconds of access to discuss Jeffrey Epstein and currency stabilization.”
Soon after Bill Clinton concluded his presidency in 2001, the ties deepened. Clinton entered a new stage of his career, in which he’d travel the world, launch philanthropic initiatives, hang out with rich people and celebrities, and make money.
“What attracted Clinton to Epstein was quite simple: He had a plane,” Landon Thomas Jr. wrote in that 2002 New York magazine profile. Clinton’s aide Doug Band made the introduction, and that September, Epstein and Clinton were off on a tour of five African countries, alongside actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker. Per Clinton’s team, the trip was about “democratization, empowering the poor, citizen service, and combating HIV/AIDS.” (It was that trip that first elevated Epstein to some media notoriety, as journalists began to dig into Clinton’s new friend.)
That wasn’t the only trip. According to Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña, in a statement last week, there was one more to Africa, one to Europe, and one to Asia — but, he says, Clinton and Epstein haven’t spoken in “well over a decade.”
Virginia Giuffre has said in an affidavit that Clinton was also present on Little St. James Island, Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. But so far, there has been no corroboration for this claim, and Ureña says Clinton has never been there.
Neither Giuffre nor any other Epstein accuser has alleged that Clinton had sex with them. Clinton was, however, credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick in the 1970s.
What makes the conspiracy theories so frustrating, in part, is that they’re premised on real elements: credible accusations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton, Clinton’s real ties to Jeffrey Epstein, and Epstein’s own well-documented sex crimes. It doesn’t take incredibly inventive conspiracy theorizing to move from that to allegations that Clinton was part of Epstein’s sex abuse and from there to wild accusations that Clinton had Epstein killed.
But we should be very clear that as of this writing, there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest someone ordered Epstein’s death, and certainly no evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton was that person.
from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2KxRcP2
0 notes
shanedakotamuir · 5 years
Text
The conspiracy theories about the Clintons and Jeffrey Epstein’s death, explained
Tumblr media
A New York state sex offender registry photo of Jeffrey Epstein. | New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
The idea that Bill and Hillary Clinton secretly kill their political enemies has circulated in right-wing fever swamps for decades.
On Wednesday, Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) sent out 23 consecutive tweets whose first letters spelled out a startling claim: EPSTEIN DIDN’T KILL HIMSELF.
Gosar has coyly resisted confirming that he was alleging that hedge fund manager and convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein was murdered. But his tweets were hardly anomalous. Epstein’s death has sparked a ton of conspiracy theorizing, and “Epstein didn’t kill himself” has become a bona fide meme, showing up in signs at college football games and posts by influential pundits like Joe Rogan.
To be clear, the New York City medical examiner has ruled that Epstein died by suicide. A former NYC medical examiner hired by Epstein’s brother has disputed this finding, but that examiner was fired after a long string of errors on his watch, making his word a little untrustworthy.
But that hasn’t stopped prominent individuals, up to and including Donald Trump, from joining in the speculation. The day of Epstein’s death, President Trump retweeted a conservative personality who captioned a video in which he pontificates at length about his theories with “we know who did this” and the hashtags #ClintonBodyCount and #ClintonCrime family. Trump was clearer than Gosar in suggesting who he thought had Epstein killed: Bill and/or Hillary Clinton.
To understand what’s going on here, you don’t just need to know about Epstein’s former friendship with Clinton (or with Trump). You just need to understand the role that allegations of murder by the Clintons have played in right-wing fever swamps since the 1990s, beginning with the suicide of Vince Foster and continuing through to the completely random 2016 murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.
What is the “Clinton Body Count”?
According to a history and debunking first published by Snopes in 1998, the body count meme originated in 1993 with Indianapolis lawyer and militia movement activist Linda Thompson, who compiled a list of 34 people connected to the Clintons who had died and titled it, “The Clinton Body Count: Coincidence or the Kiss of Death?” William Dannemeyer, a notoriously homophobic former Congress member from Orange County, California, picked up the list, trimmed it to 24, and sent it congressional leadership in 1994 as he ran for the US Senate.
Thompson provided — by her own admission — “no direct evidence” that the Clintons were responsible for any of the deaths, and Snopes provides a comprehensive account of all of them, most of which were easily explained heart attacks, plane crashes, or suicides.
The most notable name on the list is Vince Foster, the deputy White House counsel who died by suicide on July 20, 1993. Foster was a colleague of Hillary Clinton’s at the Rose Law firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, and came to Washington, DC, as part of the crew of Arkansas loyalists who joined the Clinton administration. In the job, Foster helped conduct vetting of administration officials and said he felt like he had failed the president when Clinton’s first two picks for attorney general were forced to withdraw because of revelations that they had hired undocumented immigrants.
Foster also became wrapped up in a scandal surrounding the firing of staff in the White House travel office and in legal disputes about access to records about Hillary Clinton’s health care task force, earning him a bevy of harsh Wall Street Journal editorials.
Overwhelmed by these circumstances, and clearly struggling from depression, Foster fatally shot himself. But almost immediately, conservatives jumped on the idea that Foster was murdered. Those fanning the flames included the Journal editorial board, National Review’s Richard Brookhiser, and then-Rep. Dan Burton, who tried to do some amateur ballistics research on the case by shooting a large fruit in his backyard. Reports differ as to whether Burton shot a watermelon, a pumpkin, or a cantaloupe.
Numerous investigations, as my colleague Matt Yglesias explains here, have found that Foster died by suicide. But the eagerness of conservatives, both on the more conspiratorial right and in respectable places like the Journal editorial board (Brookhiser favorably reviewed a book casting doubt on the suicide investigation in the New York Times), to doubt those findings fed the idea of a “Clinton Body Count.” So in the future, when people connected to the Clintons died because of easily understandable causes (like former business partner Jim McDougal’s heart attack death in prison), their deaths became grounds for speculation.
The death of Seth Rich in 2016 was the next major event fueling Clinton Body Count conspiracies. Rich was a 27-year-old Democratic National Committee staffer who was shot in what police believed to be an attempted robbery in DC. But almost as soon as he died, Clinton haters seized on his death and tried to argue that Hillary and/or Bill was responsible. After these rumors began, Julian Assange of Wikileaks gave the conspiracy theorists a motive by hinting that Rich, not Russian hackers, provided WikiLeaks with the DNC’s emails. WikiLeaks then offered a $20,000 reward for information about Rich’s death. The implication was that Rich’s killing was punishment for leaking damaging internal emails.
This conspiracy theory was always absurd; there is copious evidence of Russian hacking, Rich had no access to all of the DNC’s internal emails, and he certainly didn’t have access to all the other information Russia recovered, like Clinton campaign chief John Podesta’s emails. The Rich family would eventually sue Fox News unsuccessfully for its efforts to spread the conspiracy theory.
But for Clinton Body Count conspiracy theorists, the incoherence of the theory in the Rich case was never an impediment. The Rich theory soon became part of the broader QAnon conspiracy theory, which is too byzantine to explain in detail here but which my colleague Jane Coaston summarizes as arguing that “special counsel Robert Mueller and President Donald Trump are working together to expose thousands of cannibalistic pedophiles hidden in plain sight (including Hillary Clinton and actor Tom Hanks).” Obviously, the victims of Clinton’s cannibalistic pedophilia would be additions to the body count.
How this fits in with Epstein
The Foster, Rich, and QAnon allegations are clearly absurd. And, we should be very clear, there is no firm evidence at this juncture to suggest that Epstein was murdered, let alone murdered by people with ties to the Clinton.
Epstein did have very real ties to Bill Clinton. That does not mean that Clinton had anything to do with his death, any more than allegations that Donald Trump raped a 13-year-old girl while hanging out with Epstein mean that Trump had something to do with Epstein’s death.
My colleague Andrew Prokop summarized Clinton’s interactions with Epstein thusly:
According to the Daily Beast’s Emily Shugerman, Epstein visited the White House for a donor event during Bill Clinton’s presidency and met with a White House aide several times there. Shugerman also unearthed a 1995 letter from businesswoman Lynn Forester in which she said she enjoyed briefly meeting Clinton at a recent event and used her “fifteen seconds of access to discuss Jeffrey Epstein and currency stabilization.”
Soon after Bill Clinton concluded his presidency in 2001, the ties deepened. Clinton entered a new stage of his career, in which he’d travel the world, launch philanthropic initiatives, hang out with rich people and celebrities, and make money.
“What attracted Clinton to Epstein was quite simple: He had a plane,” Landon Thomas Jr. wrote in that 2002 New York magazine profile. Clinton’s aide Doug Band made the introduction, and that September, Epstein and Clinton were off on a tour of five African countries, alongside actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker. Per Clinton’s team, the trip was about “democratization, empowering the poor, citizen service, and combating HIV/AIDS.” (It was that trip that first elevated Epstein to some media notoriety, as journalists began to dig into Clinton’s new friend.)
That wasn’t the only trip. According to Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña, in a statement last week, there was one more to Africa, one to Europe, and one to Asia — but, he says, Clinton and Epstein haven’t spoken in “well over a decade.”
Virginia Giuffre has said in an affidavit that Clinton was also present on Little St. James Island, Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. But so far, there has been no corroboration for this claim, and Ureña says Clinton has never been there.
Neither Giuffre nor any other Epstein accuser has alleged that Clinton had sex with them. Clinton was, however, credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick in the 1970s.
What makes the conspiracy theories so frustrating, in part, is that they’re premised on real elements: credible accusations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton, Clinton’s real ties to Jeffrey Epstein, and Epstein’s own well-documented sex crimes. It doesn’t take incredibly inventive conspiracy theorizing to move from that to allegations that Clinton was part of Epstein’s sex abuse and from there to wild accusations that Clinton had Epstein killed.
But we should be very clear that as of this writing, there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest someone ordered Epstein’s death, and certainly no evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton was that person.
from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2KxRcP2
0 notes
lafamamusic · 3 years
Text
BÉISBOL INVERNAL - Tyler Alexander tiene salida de calidad y Gigantes superan a Toros
BÉISBOL INVERNAL – Tyler Alexander tiene salida de calidad y Gigantes superan a Toros
El zurdo Tyler Alexander tuvo una salida de calidad, lanzando hasta el séptimo. Richard Ureña, Marcell Ozuna y Henry Urrutia sonaron sendos cuadrangulares para llevar a los Gigantes de San Francisco a una victoria 5-4 sobre los Toros del Este, en encuentro celebrado en el estadio Julián Javier, en San Francisco de Macorís. La salida de Alexander fue complementada por Huascar Brazobán quien…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
gracieyvonnehunter · 5 years
Text
The conspiracy theories about the Clintons and Jeffrey Epstein’s death, explained
Tumblr media
A New York state sex offender registry photo of Jeffrey Epstein. | New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
The idea that Bill and Hillary Clinton secretly kill their political enemies has circulated in right-wing fever swamps for decades.
On Wednesday, Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) sent out 23 consecutive tweets whose first letters spelled out a startling claim: EPSTEIN DIDN’T KILL HIMSELF.
Gosar has coyly resisted confirming that he was alleging that hedge fund manager and convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein was murdered. But his tweets were hardly anomalous. Epstein’s death has sparked a ton of conspiracy theorizing, and “Epstein didn’t kill himself” has become a bona fide meme, showing up in signs at college football games and posts by influential pundits like Joe Rogan.
To be clear, the New York City medical examiner has ruled that Epstein died by suicide. A former NYC medical examiner hired by Epstein’s brother has disputed this finding, but that examiner was fired after a long string of errors on his watch, making his word a little untrustworthy.
But that hasn’t stopped prominent individuals, up to and including Donald Trump, from joining in the speculation. The day of Epstein’s death, President Trump retweeted a conservative personality who captioned a video in which he pontificates at length about his theories with “we know who did this” and the hashtags #ClintonBodyCount and #ClintonCrime family. Trump was clearer than Gosar in suggesting who he thought had Epstein killed: Bill and/or Hillary Clinton.
To understand what’s going on here, you don’t just need to know about Epstein’s former friendship with Clinton (or with Trump). You just need to understand the role that allegations of murder by the Clintons have played in right-wing fever swamps since the 1990s, beginning with the suicide of Vince Foster and continuing through to the completely random 2016 murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.
What is the “Clinton Body Count”?
According to a history and debunking first published by Snopes in 1998, the body count meme originated in 1993 with Indianapolis lawyer and militia movement activist Linda Thompson, who compiled a list of 34 people connected to the Clintons who had died and titled it, “The Clinton Body Count: Coincidence or the Kiss of Death?” William Dannemeyer, a notoriously homophobic former Congress member from Orange County, California, picked up the list, trimmed it to 24, and sent it congressional leadership in 1994 as he ran for the US Senate.
Thompson provided — by her own admission — “no direct evidence” that the Clintons were responsible for any of the deaths, and Snopes provides a comprehensive account of all of them, most of which were easily explained heart attacks, plane crashes, or suicides.
The most notable name on the list is Vince Foster, the deputy White House counsel who died by suicide on July 20, 1993. Foster was a colleague of Hillary Clinton’s at the Rose Law firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, and came to Washington, DC, as part of the crew of Arkansas loyalists who joined the Clinton administration. In the job, Foster helped conduct vetting of administration officials and said he felt like he had failed the president when Clinton’s first two picks for attorney general were forced to withdraw because of revelations that they had hired undocumented immigrants.
Foster also became wrapped up in a scandal surrounding the firing of staff in the White House travel office and in legal disputes about access to records about Hillary Clinton’s health care task force, earning him a bevy of harsh Wall Street Journal editorials.
Overwhelmed by these circumstances, and clearly struggling from depression, Foster fatally shot himself. But almost immediately, conservatives jumped on the idea that Foster was murdered. Those fanning the flames included the Journal editorial board, National Review’s Richard Brookhiser, and then-Rep. Dan Burton, who tried to do some amateur ballistics research on the case by shooting a large fruit in his backyard. Reports differ as to whether Burton shot a watermelon, a pumpkin, or a cantaloupe.
Numerous investigations, as my colleague Matt Yglesias explains here, have found that Foster died by suicide. But the eagerness of conservatives, both on the more conspiratorial right and in respectable places like the Journal editorial board (Brookhiser favorably reviewed a book casting doubt on the suicide investigation in the New York Times), to doubt those findings fed the idea of a “Clinton Body Count.” So in the future, when people connected to the Clintons died because of easily understandable causes (like former business partner Jim McDougal’s heart attack death in prison), their deaths became grounds for speculation.
The death of Seth Rich in 2016 was the next major event fueling Clinton Body Count conspiracies. Rich was a 27-year-old Democratic National Committee staffer who was shot in what police believed to be an attempted robbery in DC. But almost as soon as he died, Clinton haters seized on his death and tried to argue that Hillary and/or Bill was responsible. After these rumors began, Julian Assange of Wikileaks gave the conspiracy theorists a motive by hinting that Rich, not Russian hackers, provided WikiLeaks with the DNC’s emails. WikiLeaks then offered a $20,000 reward for information about Rich’s death. The implication was that Rich’s killing was punishment for leaking damaging internal emails.
This conspiracy theory was always absurd; there is copious evidence of Russian hacking, Rich had no access to all of the DNC’s internal emails, and he certainly didn’t have access to all the other information Russia recovered, like Clinton campaign chief John Podesta’s emails. The Rich family would eventually sue Fox News unsuccessfully for its efforts to spread the conspiracy theory.
But for Clinton Body Count conspiracy theorists, the incoherence of the theory in the Rich case was never an impediment. The Rich theory soon became part of the broader QAnon conspiracy theory, which is too byzantine to explain in detail here but which my colleague Jane Coaston summarizes as arguing that “special counsel Robert Mueller and President Donald Trump are working together to expose thousands of cannibalistic pedophiles hidden in plain sight (including Hillary Clinton and actor Tom Hanks).” Obviously, the victims of Clinton’s cannibalistic pedophilia would be additions to the body count.
How this fits in with Epstein
The Foster, Rich, and QAnon allegations are clearly absurd. And, we should be very clear, there is no firm evidence at this juncture to suggest that Epstein was murdered, let alone murdered by people with ties to the Clinton.
Epstein did have very real ties to Bill Clinton. That does not mean that Clinton had anything to do with his death, any more than allegations that Donald Trump raped a 13-year-old girl while hanging out with Epstein mean that Trump had something to do with Epstein’s death.
My colleague Andrew Prokop summarized Clinton’s interactions with Epstein thusly:
According to the Daily Beast’s Emily Shugerman, Epstein visited the White House for a donor event during Bill Clinton’s presidency and met with a White House aide several times there. Shugerman also unearthed a 1995 letter from businesswoman Lynn Forester in which she said she enjoyed briefly meeting Clinton at a recent event and used her “fifteen seconds of access to discuss Jeffrey Epstein and currency stabilization.”
Soon after Bill Clinton concluded his presidency in 2001, the ties deepened. Clinton entered a new stage of his career, in which he’d travel the world, launch philanthropic initiatives, hang out with rich people and celebrities, and make money.
“What attracted Clinton to Epstein was quite simple: He had a plane,” Landon Thomas Jr. wrote in that 2002 New York magazine profile. Clinton’s aide Doug Band made the introduction, and that September, Epstein and Clinton were off on a tour of five African countries, alongside actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker. Per Clinton’s team, the trip was about “democratization, empowering the poor, citizen service, and combating HIV/AIDS.” (It was that trip that first elevated Epstein to some media notoriety, as journalists began to dig into Clinton’s new friend.)
That wasn’t the only trip. According to Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña, in a statement last week, there was one more to Africa, one to Europe, and one to Asia — but, he says, Clinton and Epstein haven’t spoken in “well over a decade.”
Virginia Giuffre has said in an affidavit that Clinton was also present on Little St. James Island, Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. But so far, there has been no corroboration for this claim, and Ureña says Clinton has never been there.
Neither Giuffre nor any other Epstein accuser has alleged that Clinton had sex with them. Clinton was, however, credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick in the 1970s.
What makes the conspiracy theories so frustrating, in part, is that they’re premised on real elements: credible accusations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton, Clinton’s real ties to Jeffrey Epstein, and Epstein’s own well-documented sex crimes. It doesn’t take incredibly inventive conspiracy theorizing to move from that to allegations that Clinton was part of Epstein’s sex abuse and from there to wild accusations that Clinton had Epstein killed.
But we should be very clear that as of this writing, there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest someone ordered Epstein’s death, and certainly no evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton was that person.
from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2KxRcP2
0 notes
timalexanderdollery · 5 years
Text
The conspiracy theories about the Clintons and Jeffrey Epstein’s death, explained
Tumblr media
A New York state sex offender registry photo of Jeffrey Epstein. | New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
The idea that Bill and Hillary Clinton secretly kill their political enemies has circulated in right-wing fever swamps for decades.
On Wednesday, Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) sent out 23 consecutive tweets whose first letters spelled out a startling claim: EPSTEIN DIDN’T KILL HIMSELF.
Gosar has coyly resisted confirming that he was alleging that hedge fund manager and convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein was murdered. But his tweets were hardly anomalous. Epstein’s death has sparked a ton of conspiracy theorizing, and “Epstein didn’t kill himself” has become a bona fide meme, showing up in signs at college football games and posts by influential pundits like Joe Rogan.
To be clear, the New York City medical examiner has ruled that Epstein died by suicide. A former NYC medical examiner hired by Epstein’s brother has disputed this finding, but that examiner was fired after a long string of errors on his watch, making his word a little untrustworthy.
But that hasn’t stopped prominent individuals, up to and including Donald Trump, from joining in the speculation. The day of Epstein’s death, President Trump retweeted a conservative personality who captioned a video in which he pontificates at length about his theories with “we know who did this” and the hashtags #ClintonBodyCount and #ClintonCrime family. Trump was clearer than Gosar in suggesting who he thought had Epstein killed: Bill and/or Hillary Clinton.
To understand what’s going on here, you don’t just need to know about Epstein’s former friendship with Clinton (or with Trump). You just need to understand the role that allegations of murder by the Clintons have played in right-wing fever swamps since the 1990s, beginning with the suicide of Vince Foster and continuing through to the completely random 2016 murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.
What is the “Clinton Body Count”?
According to a history and debunking first published by Snopes in 1998, the body count meme originated in 1993 with Indianapolis lawyer and militia movement activist Linda Thompson, who compiled a list of 34 people connected to the Clintons who had died and titled it, “The Clinton Body Count: Coincidence or the Kiss of Death?” William Dannemeyer, a notoriously homophobic former Congress member from Orange County, California, picked up the list, trimmed it to 24, and sent it congressional leadership in 1994 as he ran for the US Senate.
Thompson provided — by her own admission — “no direct evidence” that the Clintons were responsible for any of the deaths, and Snopes provides a comprehensive account of all of them, most of which were easily explained heart attacks, plane crashes, or suicides.
The most notable name on the list is Vince Foster, the deputy White House counsel who died by suicide on July 20, 1993. Foster was a colleague of Hillary Clinton’s at the Rose Law firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, and came to Washington, DC, as part of the crew of Arkansas loyalists who joined the Clinton administration. In the job, Foster helped conduct vetting of administration officials and said he felt like he had failed the president when Clinton’s first two picks for attorney general were forced to withdraw because of revelations that they had hired undocumented immigrants.
Foster also became wrapped up in a scandal surrounding the firing of staff in the White House travel office and in legal disputes about access to records about Hillary Clinton’s health care task force, earning him a bevy of harsh Wall Street Journal editorials.
Overwhelmed by these circumstances, and clearly struggling from depression, Foster fatally shot himself. But almost immediately, conservatives jumped on the idea that Foster was murdered. Those fanning the flames included the Journal editorial board, National Review’s Richard Brookhiser, and then-Rep. Dan Burton, who tried to do some amateur ballistics research on the case by shooting a large fruit in his backyard. Reports differ as to whether Burton shot a watermelon, a pumpkin, or a cantaloupe.
Numerous investigations, as my colleague Matt Yglesias explains here, have found that Foster died by suicide. But the eagerness of conservatives, both on the more conspiratorial right and in respectable places like the Journal editorial board (Brookhiser favorably reviewed a book casting doubt on the suicide investigation in the New York Times), to doubt those findings fed the idea of a “Clinton Body Count.” So in the future, when people connected to the Clintons died because of easily understandable causes (like former business partner Jim McDougal’s heart attack death in prison), their deaths became grounds for speculation.
The death of Seth Rich in 2016 was the next major event fueling Clinton Body Count conspiracies. Rich was a 27-year-old Democratic National Committee staffer who was shot in what police believed to be an attempted robbery in DC. But almost as soon as he died, Clinton haters seized on his death and tried to argue that Hillary and/or Bill was responsible. After these rumors began, Julian Assange of Wikileaks gave the conspiracy theorists a motive by hinting that Rich, not Russian hackers, provided WikiLeaks with the DNC’s emails. WikiLeaks then offered a $20,000 reward for information about Rich’s death. The implication was that Rich’s killing was punishment for leaking damaging internal emails.
This conspiracy theory was always absurd; there is copious evidence of Russian hacking, Rich had no access to all of the DNC’s internal emails, and he certainly didn’t have access to all the other information Russia recovered, like Clinton campaign chief John Podesta’s emails. The Rich family would eventually sue Fox News unsuccessfully for its efforts to spread the conspiracy theory.
But for Clinton Body Count conspiracy theorists, the incoherence of the theory in the Rich case was never an impediment. The Rich theory soon became part of the broader QAnon conspiracy theory, which is too byzantine to explain in detail here but which my colleague Jane Coaston summarizes as arguing that “special counsel Robert Mueller and President Donald Trump are working together to expose thousands of cannibalistic pedophiles hidden in plain sight (including Hillary Clinton and actor Tom Hanks).” Obviously, the victims of Clinton’s cannibalistic pedophilia would be additions to the body count.
How this fits in with Epstein
The Foster, Rich, and QAnon allegations are clearly absurd. And, we should be very clear, there is no firm evidence at this juncture to suggest that Epstein was murdered, let alone murdered by people with ties to the Clinton.
Epstein did have very real ties to Bill Clinton. That does not mean that Clinton had anything to do with his death, any more than allegations that Donald Trump raped a 13-year-old girl while hanging out with Epstein mean that Trump had something to do with Epstein’s death.
My colleague Andrew Prokop summarized Clinton’s interactions with Epstein thusly:
According to the Daily Beast’s Emily Shugerman, Epstein visited the White House for a donor event during Bill Clinton’s presidency and met with a White House aide several times there. Shugerman also unearthed a 1995 letter from businesswoman Lynn Forester in which she said she enjoyed briefly meeting Clinton at a recent event and used her “fifteen seconds of access to discuss Jeffrey Epstein and currency stabilization.”
Soon after Bill Clinton concluded his presidency in 2001, the ties deepened. Clinton entered a new stage of his career, in which he’d travel the world, launch philanthropic initiatives, hang out with rich people and celebrities, and make money.
“What attracted Clinton to Epstein was quite simple: He had a plane,” Landon Thomas Jr. wrote in that 2002 New York magazine profile. Clinton’s aide Doug Band made the introduction, and that September, Epstein and Clinton were off on a tour of five African countries, alongside actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker. Per Clinton’s team, the trip was about “democratization, empowering the poor, citizen service, and combating HIV/AIDS.” (It was that trip that first elevated Epstein to some media notoriety, as journalists began to dig into Clinton’s new friend.)
That wasn’t the only trip. According to Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña, in a statement last week, there was one more to Africa, one to Europe, and one to Asia — but, he says, Clinton and Epstein haven’t spoken in “well over a decade.”
Virginia Giuffre has said in an affidavit that Clinton was also present on Little St. James Island, Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. But so far, there has been no corroboration for this claim, and Ureña says Clinton has never been there.
Neither Giuffre nor any other Epstein accuser has alleged that Clinton had sex with them. Clinton was, however, credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick in the 1970s.
What makes the conspiracy theories so frustrating, in part, is that they’re premised on real elements: credible accusations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton, Clinton’s real ties to Jeffrey Epstein, and Epstein’s own well-documented sex crimes. It doesn’t take incredibly inventive conspiracy theorizing to move from that to allegations that Clinton was part of Epstein’s sex abuse and from there to wild accusations that Clinton had Epstein killed.
But we should be very clear that as of this writing, there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest someone ordered Epstein’s death, and certainly no evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton was that person.
from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2KxRcP2
0 notes
Tumblr media
Gigantes se apuntan primera victoria de la temporada ante los Toros LA ROMANA.- En un partido donde se conectaron cinco triples, los Toros del Este cayeron derrotados 6-3 ante los Gigantes del Cibao, en partido celebrado en el Estadio Francisco Michelo. Con la derrota, los Toros caen a 7-3 como dueños de casa y ven quebrada una racha de 7 victorias seguidas en el corral. Mientras que los Gigantes, consiguen mejorar a 5-5 en calidad de visitantes. La serie particular la siguen dominando los de La Romana (3-1). La victoria fue para Carlos Ramírez (1-0), luego de tirar dos tercios de inning, ponchando a un bateador. Pedro Payano (0-1), cargó con la derrota luego de trabajar durante dos tercios de entrada en los que permitió dos carreras limpias, un hit, concedió un boleto y ponchó un bateador. Los Gigantes anotaron primero en el inicio del partido, cuando José Sirí pegó fly de sacrificio al jardín central, con corredores en las esquinas. Los Toros empataron las acciones en la conclusión del primer inning, con triple de Peter O’Brien con hombres en las esquinas. En la apertura del segundo, Kade Scivicque pegó triple con corredor en primera y los Giganes tomaron el comando del partido 2-1. Dairon Blanco consiguió triple con hombre en la inicial para empatar las acciones a dos carreras en el cierre del episodio. Moisés Sierra remolcó la tercera de los Gigantes en la alta del quinto, con sencillo al centro y los Toros respondieron y empataron nuevamente el marcador con doblete remolcador de Jordany Valdespín. Drew Weeks sacudió un triple con dos abordo y los Gigantes volvieron a tomar el comando de la pizarra 5-3 en la sexta entrada y Richard Ureña amplió la ventaja de los Gigantes con doble productor de la número 6 y posteriormente anotó con error en tiro del lanzador en rodado al box de Kade Scivicque un episodio más tarde. Por los Gigantes, Richard Ureña de 4-3 con una producida y una anotada, Moisés Sierra de 5-3 con una anotada y una remolcada. Por los Toros, Dairon Blanco de 4-2 con una anotada y una carrera producida, Jordany Valdespín de 3-1 con una empujada y Yamaico Navarro de 4-1 con una anotada. #osnyenlosdeportes #beisbollatinord #loquepasohoy #toro (en Estadio Francisco Micheli) https://www.instagram.com/p/B4jPchFgFGd/?igshid=1fzrv912hf1jm
0 notes
protagonistassjm · 5 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Gigantes le dan paliza a Leones Richard Ureña es felicitado tras conectar jonrón de tres carreras en la primera entrada. Gigantes apalean a Leones…
0 notes
sciencespies · 5 years
Text
How Marian Anderson Became an Iconic Symbol for Equality
https://sciencespies.com/history/how-marian-anderson-became-an-iconic-symbol-for-equality/
How Marian Anderson Became an Iconic Symbol for Equality
Tumblr media
Conductor Arturo Toscanini dubbed her a once-in-a-hundred years talent, and yet music schools in her home town of Philadelphia would not entertain her as a student, and she did not find true fame until she left Jim Crow America behind and went to Europe.
Even at the height of her fame, African-American contralto singer Marian Anderson encountered barriers erected solely because of the color of her skin. And yet, she kept pursuing her love, with the support of her church and community, a launch to fame via an adoring European audience, and her refusal to bow down to American segregationist policies.
An exhibition at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery traces the trajectory of Anderson’s life, from young ingenue to European concert hall star to civil rights pioneer to cultural icon.
But, says curator Leslie Ureña, Anderson “always grappled with this label—what it means to be an iconic symbol.” Through its photographs, paintings and memorabilia, “One Life: Marian Anderson” attempts to show that tension—the exceedingly private and humble Anderson versus the worldwide phenom.
If known at all today, Anderson may be remembered by many as a figure in the Civil Rights Movement. At her peak, however, she “was the Beyonce of her day,” says Ureña.
Soon, Anderson will be back in the limelight and known more fully again—she is the subject of a documentary by a Philadelphia-based filmmaker that will make the rounds this fall, and in 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department announced that her historic performance at the Lincoln Memorial in 1939 willappear on the back of the $5 bill starting sometime in the 2020s.
Bill Nicoletti said he made Once in a Hundred Years: The Life and Legacy of Marian Anderson to showcase her indomitable spirit. All Philadelphians are familiar with the Rocky film franchise and its fairy-tale-like story of the hometown boxer’s rise from the ashes, again and again. But, says Nicoletti, Anderson “is the real Rocky story.”
“She continued to get knocked down over and over and over and she just persevered,” he says.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Anderson (above, as a child,1898) spent her formative years in south Philadelphia in a community that would nurture her budding artistry.
(Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvania Libraries)
Anderson, born in 1897, spent her formative years in a south Philadelphia neighborhood near the center of black intellectual and cultural life—a community that eventually would help the budding young artist. She began singing in the Union Baptist Church choir at age 6—encouraged by an aunt who had noticed her talent. Starting at that tender age, Anderson delivered performances that inspired and impressed. Within a few years, she was a member of the People’s Choir, taking on solos and earning money. The income—as much as $5 a show—was particularly important after her father, an ice and coal seller at Reading Market, died after suffering an injury while on the job.
At 12, Anderson became a family breadwinner. But she could not have gone to high school without the financial support of her church. After graduation, Anderson sought to apply to the Philadelphia Music Academy, but was told “we don’t take colored people,” says Ureña.
Eventually, she was connected with Giuseppe Boghetti, a Philadelphia-area opera teacher who was not afraid to take an African-American student under his wing.
In 1925—when Anderson was 28—Boghetti encouraged her to enter a New York Philharmonic competition. Facing off against 300 other aspiring singers, Anderson won and was awarded a solo performance at Lewisohn Stadium, before a crowd of 7,500. It was transformational, says Ureña. A Kubey-Rembrandt Studio print of Anderson from that year shows her elegantly posed in partial profile, wearing a fashionable sheath dress, and smiling for the camera. But, like many other African-American artists at the time, Anderson felt she was not getting her proper due. She left for Europe and starting in London, she made her debut at the Wigmore Hall in 1928.
Though Anderson went back to the states and performed some that year, she was able to win a fellowship from the Julius Rosenwald Fund, established by a wealthy Chicago philanthropist who gave millions to African-American schools and causes. The money helped pay for a move to Berlin in 1930 and a deeper study of German and lieder music.
Soon, “Marian Mania” broke out all over Europe, but in particular in Scandinavia. She soloed for King Gustav of Sweden and King Christian of Denmark, adding fuel to the growing fire of desire for her performances, which covered everything from German lieder, to Italian opera, to Russian folk songs, to traditional African-American spirituals.
A studio in Copenhagen used Anderson’s face—taken with a camera that could capture 48 photographs on one negative—as a marketing vehicle, plastering the multiple images over the front and back of one of its advertising brochures.
In the 1930s, the rise of Nazism began casting a shadow over Anderson’s bookings, but not before she got to perform at the 1935 Salzburg Festival in Austria.
Anderson headed back to the U.S., her fame now preceding her. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his wife Eleanor invited her to perform at the White House in 1936, making her the first African-American to do so.
Despite her global acclaim, she was forced to ride in segregated train cars and perform for Whites-only audiences. At one point, she put a clause in her contract that she would only play at integrated venues, but even then, at a Miami concert, the local police were a heavy presence, says Ureña.
In 1937, no hotel in Princeton would house her after her performance at the university. Albert Einstein—who would become a friend for life—invited her to stay, which was the first of many occasions that Anderson would overnight with the physicist and his wife.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Standing before many microphones, Marian Anderson (above: by Robert S. Scurlock, 1939, detail) sang from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial before a crowd of 75,000.
(Scurlock Studio Records, Archives Center, NMAH)
Meanwhile, Howard University in Washington, DC was hoping to host a concert series that would feature Anderson and was looking for a venue large enough to accommodate her adoring fans. The university turned to Constitution Hall, owned by the Daughters of the American Revolution. The D.A.R., however, had a strict policy against allowing black performers and turned Howard down, setting off a national firestorm. Anderson said nothing, even when repeatedly prompted by reporters for comment.
Eleanor Roosevelt, a D.A.R. member, resigned in protest and formed a committee to find a new venue. Through her husband’s administration, she found a stage for Anderson that could not have been more symbolic—the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. On Easter Sunday, April 9, 1939, as Interior Secretary Harold Ickes introduced her, he intoned, “Genius draws no color lines.”
Anderson, then 42, trilled out “My Country Tis of Thee (America),” sending shivers up the spines of the 75,000—black and white—audience members who filled the grassy expanses on the National Mall. Photographer Robert Scurlock captured Anderson, eyes closed in concentration, standing before a half-dozen or more microphones, wrapped in a full-length mink coat. In another view, Arthur Ellis points his camera up at Anderson from a distance; the angle makes it seem like Abraham Lincoln is peering over her left shoulder.
The 25-minute concert is often viewed as one of the defining moments of the Civil Rights Movement, says Ureña.
Later the same year, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) invited Anderson to its annual convention in Richmond, Virginia to accept its highest honor—the Spingarn Medal. Eleanor Roosevelt was there to drape the medal around Anderson’s neck—a moment captured by an unknown photographer who made it appear as if the two tall, be-hatted women were mirror images.
Though she was viewed as a role model, “she was an understated activist,” says Nicoletti.
Ureña says Anderson wanted the focus to be on the music—not her politics. Yet she continued to break barriers.
By the mid-1940s, Anderson had performed in halls all over the globe—including France, England, Switzerland, the Scandinavian countries, Cuba, Brazil, Venezuela, Columbia, El Salvador and Russia. At one point, she had 60 performances in seven months. She was traveling some 20,000- to 30,000-miles a year.
Tumblr media
Artist William H. Johnson depicted Anderson’s ascendance (above: c. 1945) amidst various flags and facades where she had made her mark.
(SAAM, gift of the Harmon Foundation)
Her globe-trotting exploits were commemorated in a folksy 1945 painting with Anderson ascendant at the center, her pianist over her left shoulder, with various flags and facades representing the places she had made her mark, scattered around her. The painting is by William H. Johnson, a black American artist who also had gone to Europe to make the most of his artistic gifts, free of prejudice.
In the late 1940s, she returned to Lewisohn Stadium in New York City, this time with the famed pianist Leonard Bernstein to perform before a crowd of 20,000. Vogue’s Irving Penn photographed Anderson in 1948—in a full, black, lacy, diva-like gown—her status escalated ever higher.
Anderson became the first black soloist at the Metropolitan Opera in 1955, playing Ulrica in Verdi’s opera Un ballo in maschera. A portrait of her in character by Richard Avedon shows a powerful, sensual woman, eyes closed, lips pursed in song, hair flowing freely.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
At New York City’s Lewisohn Stadium, Anderson (above by Ruth Orkin, 1947, detail) performed with Leonard Bernstein.
(NPG, © Ruth Orkin)
She went on to sing at the inaugurations of two presidents—Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy, Jr., the first black woman to do so—and was named both a goodwill ambassador for the U.S. State Department and a delegate to the United Nations.
Anderson quietly supported many civil rights causes, and also sang at the 1963 March on Washington—where Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech.
But Anderson also strove to be seen as a human being.
A kiosk at the Portrait Gallery exhibition features a clip from a short promotional video that was designed to show viewers at the time that Anderson was just like everyone else.
It was filmed at her home, Marianna Farm, in Danbury, Connecticut. The film actually reveals a Renaissance woman. She tends a garden and cavorts with her dogs. She reupholsters a chair, and mends her own clothes, deftly using a sewing machine. The singer, who brought a camera with her on every tour, is shown developing prints in her home darkroom.
By the time of her death in 1993, she had received multiple honorary degrees and awards, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, Congressional Gold Medal, Kennedy Center Honors, and a Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award. She had performed at every major concert hall in America. And she had been a board member of Carnegie Hall for seven decades—firmly placing her in the pantheon of American music.
“One Life: Marian Anderson,” curated by Leslie Ureña, is on view at the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C. through May 17, 2020. It coincides with two Institution-wide initiatives organized by the Smithsonian, including the Smithsonian American Women’s History Initiative, “Because of Her Story,” and the 2019 celebration of the Smithsonian’s Year of Music.
#History
0 notes
infoenn · 3 years
Photo
Tumblr media
San Francisco de Macorís.- Con rally de ocho carreras en la segunda entrada, los Gigantes del Cibao se impusieron ante las Estrellas Orientales 9-4 este viernes en el Estadio Julián Javier, en la novena jornada del Round Robin. La victoria es la tercera consecutiva para el equipo del Cibao, y se mantiene en la primera posición con registro de 7-2, los Tigres del Licey en segundo lugar con 5-4, Aguilas Cibaeñas empatadas con Estrellas Orientales en tercero con 3-6. Richelson Peña (0-0,0.00), en tres episodios tuvo dos imparables, dos boletos y ponchó a tres. Andrew Case (1-9, 0.00), fue el ganador. Juan Minaya(1-0, 0.00), obtuvo su tercer salvamento. Radhamés Liz (0-3, 12.86), solo pudo completar una entrada, permitió cinco imparables, cinco carreras, cuatro limpias, un ponche y cargó con la derrota. Rally de ocho carreras Juan Francisco empujó la primera carrera de los Gigantes con doble en la segunda entrada ante Radhamés Liz. Carlos Peguero con sencillo al jardín central , Juan Francisco anoto desde tercera 2-0. En la misma entrada, el receptor Carlos Paulino conectó batazo doble remolcador de dos más 4-0. Richard Ureña disparó cuadrangular con uno a bordo para ampliar el marcador 6-0. La ofensiva continuó respondiendo y Marcell Ozuna conectó jonrón en la misma entrada y dos más llegaron 8-0. En la tercera Richard Urena con sencillo remolcó la novena vuelta. Los Gigantes lideran la categoría de los jonrones en el Round Robin con 9. El cubano Henry Urrutia en primer lugar con tres, José Sirí; dos, Juan Francisco; uno, Marcell Ozuna; dos y Richard Urena uno. Vea completo este artículo en www.infoenn.com y/o en el enlace de nuestro perfil #noticiasenn1 Puedes recibir nuestro contenido vía WhatsApp, escríbenos con tu nombre al 809-853-5020 Te ha gustado, síguenos… ¡compártelo con tus amigos! https://www.instagram.com/p/CYeLhK7L8l1/?utm_medium=tumblr
0 notes
junker-town · 5 years
Text
Vlad Jr. is finally in the majors, where he belongs
Tumblr media
The long awaited arrival of Vladimir Guerrero Jr. to the major leagues has finally come, with the Blue Jays star and son of a Hall of Famer making his big league debut for Toronto on Friday night.
Still just a month after turning 20 years old, Guerrero played third base and batted fifth for Toronto against the A’s.
The consensus top prospect in baseball, Guerrero was very likely ready to test his mettle against major league competition and some point in 2018, but was kept in the minor leagues thanks to a systemic incentive to manipulate service time.
“Our vision, it really comes down to development,” Blue Jays general manager Ross Atkins told MLB Network Radio in February. “I just don’t see him as a major league player.”
Just 25 games into the season, all of a sudden Guerrero is a major league player. How convenient the timing.
It was painfully obvious that Guerrero was going to be held down on the farm to start 2019 as well, at least until April 12. That’s the date after which there isn’t enough time left in the season to accrue the necessary 172 days for a full year of service time. Under the current collective bargaining agreement, players don’t qualify for free agency until they reach six years of service time. By gaming the system and waiting a few weeks, a potential star-type can effectively be in the majors for seven years instead of six before reaching the free market. For Guerrero, that means not reaching free agency until after the 2025 season instead of 2024.
It happened to Kris Bryant in 2015 with the Cubs, and again with Ronald Acuña Jr. in 2018 with the Braves. It would have happened with Guerrero this year too but an oblique injury during spring training took that decision out of the Blue Jays’ hands.
This trend might be corrected with the next CBA, but the current agreement runs through 2021. So for now we are stuck with a flawed system that rewards major league teams for not fielding their best rosters.
Major League Baseball has been running ads this season pleading to “Let the kids play,” yet until players like Guerrero, Acuña, Bryant and others are not artificially shackled, those words ring hollow.
Father & son
In eight games in Buffalo this season, Guerrero was 11-for-30 with three home runs, hitting .367/.424/.700. It’s par for the course for the hitting savant, who hit .343/.416/.593 in 38 games at Triple-A and hit .331/.413/.531 overall in his four minor league seasons.
The bat is what sets Guerrero apart, and the hype surrounding his arrival in the majors has grown to the point where even his batting practices are must watch, even before his very first major league game.
First BP with the Blue Jays? Off the window! @vladdyjr27 | #LetsGoBlueJays pic.twitter.com/FHcIvQe2tJ
— Toronto Blue Jays (@BlueJays) April 26, 2019
Guerrero was called up on Friday, with infielder Richard Ureña optioned to Triple-A Buffalo to make room on the active roster as well as set Urena up as the answer to a trivia question decades from now. Guerrero wears No. 27, just like his father, who hit .318/.379/.553 with 449 home runs in a spectacular 16-year career that saw him make nine All-Star teams and win an MVP.
My son! The country that saw you as a child will now see you turn into a big one. Working hard everything can be done. I’m proud of you! Love you! ❤️ pic.twitter.com/WJyLBVKWoR
— Vladimir Guerrero (@VladGuerrero27) April 25, 2019
Vlad Sr. was elected to the Hall of Fame in 2018. Vlad Jr. entered the stadium in Toronto on Friday wearing his dad’s old Expos jersey.
Vlad's day. pic.twitter.com/7Vbe9Wq7Bl
— MLB (@MLB) April 26, 2019
The elder Guerrero batted sixth in his major league debut, back on Sept. 19, 1996, going 1-for-5 against the Braves.
0 notes