Tumgik
#ahmed aljabry
could-be-calliope · 2 years
Text
all hail Ahmed's commitment to the PEZ dispenser bit
50 notes · View notes
kristsune · 2 years
Audio
Chapter and Multiverse: Masks has captured my heart, and after last week’s episode I had to do a little post for Joseph and his now natural habitat: The Vents.
44 notes · View notes
day0one · 4 years
Link
A top former Saudi spy files suit spills the beans at an awkward time for Trump
A former senior Saudi intelligence officer in exile filed a lawsuit in a US court last week accusing Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of plotting to kill him. The allegations, including using children as bargaining chips, have sparked calls for President Donald Trump, in the thick of a difficult campaign season, to intervene on moral grounds.
In September 2017, a former top Saudi intelligence officer living in exile was desperately trying to get his two children safely out of the Gulf kingdom. Picking up his iPhone, Saad Aljabri got on WhatsApp and contacted the most powerful man in his homeland, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
The WhatsApp communication between Aljabri and MBS – as the Saudi crown prince is widely known – is detailed in a lawsuit filed last week in a US court.
Defend democracy. Click to invest in courageous progressive journalism today. While the allegations have not yet been verified in court, the lawsuit makes for a jaw-dropping and yet disconcertingly familiar read.
“Tell me what you want in person,” texted MBS, according to the lawsuit, which includes a screenshot of the exchange in Arabic with an English translation.
“I hope that you will consider what I have already sent you because this issue regarding the children is very important to me,” replied Aljabri.
Two minutes later, Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler once again urged the former intelligence official in exile to return home. “I definitely need you here,” said bin Salman.
Before Aljabri could reply, the crown prince added a terse, “24 hours!”
A crown prince falls, a crackdown begins
Four months earlier, Aljabri, a close advisor to bin Salman’s arch-rival, Prince Muhammad bin Nayef, had fled Saudi Arabia for Turkey. He was still in Turkey in June 2017, when his ex-boss, bin Nayef – a longtime former Saudi interior minister – was stripped of his latest post as the kingdom’s crown prince and replaced by MBS.
File photo taken in September 2016 of Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Nayef in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. File photo taken in September 2016 of Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Nayef in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. REUTERS – Ahmed Jadallah In his new position as crown prince, the brash, young MBS had begun a crackdown against his rivals and opponents in the kingdom. As a right-hand man of Saudi Arabia’s former interior minister, Aljabri was a key link between Saudi and Western intelligence services and privy to highly sensitive information on the kingdom’s rulers.
Bin Salman wanted him back in Saudi Arabia “where he could be killed”, the lawsuit alleges.
Days after the Whatsapp exchange with MBS granting him “24 hours”, Aljabri left Turkey for Canada. But two of his eight children, Omar and Sarah, were trapped in Saudi Arabia and are still being used as “human bait” to lure their father home, according to the lawsuit.
The Saudi strategy failed to entice Aljabri back. Instead, it caught the attention of US lawmakers who called on President Donald Trump to act.
US senators remind Trump of a ‘moral obligation’
Last month, four US senators on both sides of the aisle urged Trump to help secure the release of Omar, 21, and Sarah, 20, calling it a “moral obligation” to help the former Saudi intelligence official in exile.
In a letter to the White House, Republican Senator Marco Rubio and Democratic senators, Patrick Leahy, Tim Kaine, and Chris Van Hollen, described Aljabri as a “highly valued partner” of US intelligence and State Department agencies “who has been credited by former CIA officials for saving thousands of American lives by discovering and preventing terrorist plots”.
The children’s fate also pushed their father, a 62-year-old former government official with nearly four decades of experience in the secretive world of national security and counterterrorism, to take the unusually public step of filing a civil lawsuit in a US court.
‘Tiger Squad’ on a campaign to kill
The lawsuit filed last week at US District Court for the District of Columbia alleges that bin Salman launched a state campaign to kill Aljabri that “has worked to achieve that objective over the past three years”.
Aljabri bases his claim on two US laws: the Torture Victim Protection Act, which bans extrajudicial killing; and the Alien Tort Statute, which allows victims – including non-US citizens or residents – of such illegal operations to sue in US courts.
The 170-page document details chilling but as yet unverified plots to target Aljabri. They include the arrival at a Canadian airport of a Saudi “Tiger Squad” hit team – similar to the one used to kill journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Turkey – to target Aljabri.
The complaint also sheds light on the moves by global intelligence and law enforcement agencies to contain some of bin Salman’s human rights excesses on foreign soil. In October 2018, for instance, just weeks after Khashoggi’s brutal killing, vigilant Canadian authorities stopped and questioned Tiger Squad members who arrived separately at Ontario airport, the lawsuit claims. Most of the team were sent back home to Saudi Arabia.
Interpol snags ‘politically motivated’ warrant request
MBS, the lawsuit alleges, had warned Aljabri that he would use “legal measures as well as other measures that would be harmful to you”.
But the Saudi crown prince’s attempts to use “legal measures” were stymied at Interpol, the global law enforcement agency based in the French city of Lyon, the US court document reveals.
In a July 4, 2018 decision taken months before Khashoggi’s killing sparked an international furor, the Commission for the Control of Interpol’s Files (CCF) found Saudi Arabia’s arrest and extradition request for Aljabri was “politically motivated rather than strictly juridical”. While any person has the right to request Interpol data about them, the CCF decision on the Aljabri case was not publicly known before the lawsuit was filed last week.
‘In the business of assassinating people’
The Aljabri case once again casts a spotlight on Saudi Arabia’s human rights violations at home and against its citizens abroad.
“It’s a lawsuit containing accusations that are not yet proved, but these are serious accusations against the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, which is a very powerful country. If the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is in the business of assassinating people, it’s very important,” said Rami Khoury, a journalism professor at the American University of Beirut (AUB) and senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School, in an interview with FRANCE 24.
The crown prince’s role in Khashoggi’s assassination has been a public relations nightmare for the oil-rich Gulf kingdom. While MBS has acknowledged that men working for him killed the Washington Post columnist inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, he denies involvement in the murder.
His denials are widely disbelieved. In June 2019, an investigation into Khashoggi’s killing by UN Human Rights Special Rapporteur Agnès  Callamard found “credible evidence, warranting further criminal investigation”, of the involvement of top Saudi officials, including bin Salman.
The latest Aljabri allegations – which names bin Salman and several Saudi officials implicated in Khashoggi’s murder, such as Saud “Mr. Hashtag” al-Qahtani, as defendants – are strikingly similar to the slain journalist’s case.
But the Khashoggi investigations so far have been impeded by political and diplomatic challenges.
As a UN special rapporteur, Callamard works as a volunteer, not UN staffer, and her office is independent of UN institutions. The fiery French human rights lawyer has publicly criticized UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres for failing to act on her investigation findings to set up a panel of criminal experts.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration has been stonewalling Congressional attempts to enforce accountability for Khashoggi’s murder while a Turkish trial on the case lacks international credibility, given the weaknesses of the Turkish justice system.
‘Lost in the world of the rule of law’
Aljabri’s extraordinary recourse in a US court of law opens the gates to a level of transparency that could, depending on the court proceedings, be damning for the crown prince, some experts believe.
“The accusations against Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will be adjudicated in a US court using the instruments of the rule of law,” said Khoury. “This is being put into the public light. If a crown prince or ruler of a country is convicted as a criminal, that’s very important.”
Khoury, like every Saudi expert, does not expect the crown prince to appear before a US court. Unlike criminal cases, civil suits pursue compensations, not prison sentences. On Friday, August 7, the US district court issued a summons or an official notice of a lawsuit given to defendants being sued. Saudi authorities have not responded so far to media organisations about the case.
It’s unfamiliar terrain for Saudi authorities accustomed to petrodollar diplomacy, including the use of top lobby groups during crises. “The Saudis aren’t used to it, they’re totally lost in the world of the rule of law. They operate on personal relations and don’t know how to deal with this shift into the chambers of Congress and into the chambers of courts,” explained Khoury.
Kushner-Saudi way of doing business
The Saudi way of doing diplomatic business found a perfect partner in Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, who developed a personal relationship with MBS.
“Trump and Kushner, both used to shady real estate deals, adapted quickly to Saudi Arabia’s system of patronage and clientelism: unwavering support from the Trump administration for the promise of weapons sales and other business deals,” noted Mohamad Bazzi, a New York University journalism professor, in a Guardian column.
But the Saudis are keenly aware that in the US – unlike in their conservative country of glacial or paternalistic reforms – the winds of change can swerve abruptly.
The Aljabri case filing comes barely three months before the November US presidential election, with the Saudis bracing for a potential change in the White House. Historically, a confluence of oil and business interests makes a Republican US president a better fit for Saudi interests.
Joe Biden, the centrist, septuagenarian Democratic presidential candidate, is not expected to bring radical change if he wins the November 3 election. But unlike Trump, who protected MBS in the fallout of Khashoggi’s killing, Biden is unlikely to give the crown prince’s human rights violations a pass. “Joe Biden is more inclined to obey international law and follow public opinion and pressure from senators,” noted Khoury.
The pressure is expected to mount as Aljabri’s unusual lawsuit winds its way through US court proceedings before and after the 2020 presidential election.
0 notes
balkantimes · 4 years
Text
'Saudijska igra prijestolja': Raste pritisak da se oslobodi zatvoreni princ
Tumblr media
Delegacija Evropskog parlamenta zamolila je saudijske vlasti da oslobode pritvorene članove kraljevske porodice.
Lobistički napori vrijedni dva miliona američkih dolara i peticije evropskih zastupnika povećavaju pritisak na Saudijsku Arabiju da oslobodi princa filantropa koji je zatvoren dvije godine bez optužnice tokom rastućeg udara na kraljevsku porodicu.
Pritvaranje princa Salmana bin Abdulaziza bin Salmana al-Sauda i njegovog oca od januara 2018. smatra se dijelom obračuna de facto vladara, prestolonasljednika Mohammeda bin Salmana, s potencijalnim političkim rivalima, pojedincima optuženim za korupciju i ponekad osobama koje nisu vidljiv izazov njegovoj vladavini.
U martu su pritvoreni princ Ahmed bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, brat kralja Salmana, te monarhov nećak, princ Mohammed bin Nayef, koji je svrgnut s pozicije prestolonasljednika prije dvije godine.
Obračun je zahvatio i članove porodice Saada Aljabrija, bivšeg Bin Nayefovog pomoćnika, koji je pobjegao u Kanadu.
'Hodajući bjanko ček'
Princa Salmana mnogi smatraju malo vjerovatnom metom: 37-godišnjak koji govori više jezika i koji je studirao na Sorboni očito nikad nije iskazivao nikakve političke ambicije i zadobio je reputaciju kao "hodajući bjanko ček" zbog finansiranja programa razvoja u siromašnim zemljama.
"Ovo nije samo nezakonito hapšenje", kazao je prinčev saradnik agenciji AFP. "Ovo je otmica usred bijela dana. Ovo je prisilni nestanak."
Nakon što je bio pritvoren gotovo godinu u zatvoru visoke sigurnosti Al-Ha'ir u blizini Rijada, a zatim u privatnoj vili s ocem, princem Abdulazizom bin Salmanom, princ Salman u martu je premješten u pritvor na tajnoj lokaciji, kazalo je više izvora AFP-u.
Misteriozno je vraćen u vilu prošle sedmice kako bi se ponovo sastao s ocem, kazalo je troje od tih izvora.
Ostaje nejasno zašto je prebačen na tajno mjesto. Njegove telefonske pozive porodici nadziru saudijski obavještajci, kazali su izvori.
Ipak, njegov povratak mogao bi biti nagovještaj toga da međunarodni pritisak za oslobođenje djeluje. Saudijske vlasti nisu odgovorile na zahtjev za komentar u ovom slučaju.
Molba Evropljana
Delegacija Evropskog parlamenta zamolilaje saudijske vlasti da oslobode pritvorene članove kraljevske porodice, uključujući princa Salmana, tokom posjete Rijadu u februaru, navode izvori i međunarodni izvještaj o posjeti u koji je uvid imao AFP.
"Evropski parlament već je zatražio informaciju u vezi sa slučajem u pismu poslanom (...) prestolonasljedniku Mohammedu bin Salmanu, koje je (i dalje) neodgovoreno", napisao je Evropskoj komisiji Marc Tarabella, potpredsjednik delegacije EP-a za odnose na Arapskom poluotoku.
"Zamolio bih vas da pokrenete ovo pitanje (...) s najvišim relevantnim zvaničnicima u Saudijskoj Arabiji, apelirajući na oslobađanje princa Salmana. I dalje sam uvjeren da bi oslobađanje pozitivno utjecalo na odnose Evropskog parlamenta sa Saudijskom Arabijom", napisao je on.
Zasebno, Sonoran Policy Group Roberta Stryka, vodećeg lobista iz Washingtona, potpisala je u maju ugovor vrijedan dva miliona dolara kako bi se zalagala za oslobađanje princa "kod vlada Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva, Francuske i Evropske unije", prema dokumentu američkog Ministarstva pravde u koji je uvid imao AFP.
Stryka, poznatog po bliskim odnosima s administracijom američkog predsjednika Donalda Trumpa – saveznika princa Mohammeda – angažirao je Hashim Mughal, osoba bliska princu Salmanu koja živi u Parizu, pokazuje isti dokument.
Međunarodni napori
Izvor je Muhgala, pakistanskog državljanina, opisao kao prinčevog bivšeg finansijskog saveznika, koji je prikupio dva miliona dolara dajući vlastiti novac i dobijajući sredstava od utjecajnih prijatelja iz kraljevske porodice.
Međunarodni napori kockanje su koje bi se moglo obiti o glavu u kraljevini čiji se autoritarni vladari žestoko suprotstavljaju javnim kritikama.
No, budući da privatni apeli vladarima ne daju rezultate, kampanja bi mogla biti jedina nada u vrijeme kada se Kraljevina bori s ekonomskim padom uzrokovanim korona virusom, a u Washingtonu raste nezadovoljstvo zbog agresivnih politika princa Mohammeda.
Princ Salman jedan je u nizu članova kraljevske porodice koje je zatočio princ Mohammed kako bi eliminirao potencijalne suparnike i imao vlast kakva nije viđena kod prethodnih vladara.
Dva odrasla djeteta i brat Aljabrija, bivšeg Bin Nayefovog pomoćnika, također su pritvoreni u martu, a izvor blizak porodici za njih je kazao da su "žrtve saudijske igre prijestolja".
Aljabri, prognan u Kanadu, ranije je pokušao svoju djecu izvući iz Saudijske Arabije, ali su im vlasti izrekle zabranu putovanja, kazao je izvor za AFP.
Princeza Basmah bint Saud, još jedna članica kraljevske porodice koja se smatra bliskom Bin Nayefu, zajedno sa kćerkom bez optužnice je godinu zatvorena u Al-Ha'iru.
Porodica je izgubila sav kontakt s njom nakon što su na Twitteru objavili očajnički apel za njeno oslobađanje u aprilu, kazao je izvor za AFP.
Povod za hapšenje
Nepolitički filantropski rad princa Salmana čini ga malo vjerovatnim prestolonasljednikovim suparnikom.
Kraljevski dvor mogao je uznemiriti prinčev sastanak s kongresmenom Adamom Schiffom, demokratom i kritičarem Trumpa, malo prije američkih predsjedničkih izbora 2016.
Njegovi pomoćnici kažu da "ništa politički" nije razgovarano.
Schiffov ured saopćio je za AFP da se on ne sjeća detalja razgovora, ali da su možda razgovarali o "Saudijskoj Arabiji općenito".
"Oni koji su se zalagali za njegovo hapšenje ozbiljno su pogrešno protumačili američku politiku", kazala je AFP-u Kirsten Fontenrose, bivša zvaničnica Bijele kuće zadužena za politiku prema Saudijskoj Arabiji, a sada članica Atlantskog vijeća.
"Zatvaranje nekoga zbog sastanka s istaknutim demokratom samo će otežati Trumpu da održi bliske veze sa saudijskom vladajućom porodicom uoči američkih izbora."
Izvor
0 notes