#arvind kejriwal enforcement directorate

[newsdaliy998]

दिल्ली के नजफगढ़ से आम आदमी पार्टी से विधायक श्री कैलाश गहलोत दिल्ली सरकार में परिवहन कानून और गृहमंत्री हैं । हाल ही में आबकारी नीति घोटाले से संबंधित मामले में ईडी ने दिल्ली के मुख्यमंत्री श्री अरविंद केजरीवाल को गिरफ्तार किया है ।

[newnewz]

Delhi Court Summons Arvind Kejriwal Following Fresh Complaint from Probe Agency

In the ongoing saga surrounding the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) summons to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his steadfast refusal to comply, a Delhi court has now directed the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader to appear before it on March 16.

This latest summons is a result of the central agency’s determination to question Mr. Kejriwal regarding the Delhi excise policy case. The ED informed the court that the Chief Minister had ignored numerous summonses issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Mr. Kejriwal has chosen not to respond to eight summonses issued by the ED, alleging that the Narendra Modi government is exploiting central agencies like the ED to target opposition leaders.

The most recent summons from the agency was issued in late February, setting March 4 as the date for questioning. Dismissing the summons as “illegal,” the AAP leader expressed readiness to appear before the agency via video-conferencing. However, the ED insisted on a physical appearance, citing the absence of provisions for questioning via video-conferencing.

The ED had previously arrested two prominent AAP leaders, former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia, and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, in connection with the money laundering case related to Delhi’s now-abandoned excise policy.

Mr. Kejriwal’s name has been recurrently mentioned in charge sheets filed by the ED. The agency contends that the individuals implicated in the case were in communication with the Chief Minister during the formulation of the excise policy.

[werindialive]

Supreme Court Criticises CBI’s Arrest in Arvind Kejriwal Case, Suggests Intent to Frustrate Bail 

In a significant development, the Supreme Court issued strong remarks on the actions of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding the ongoing legal proceedings involving Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. The court suggested that the timing of Kejriwal's recent arrest could be perceived as an attempt to obstruct his bail process in an Enforcement Directorate (ED) case. This observation has raised serious questions about the CBI's motivations and its conduct in high-profile cases involving political figures.

Arvind Kejriwal, who has been facing several investigations related to alleged corruption and financial irregularities, is currently entangled in a case led by the ED. Just as his bail hearing was approaching, the CBI made a move to arrest him, prompting accusations that the agency’s actions were not purely in pursuit of justice but rather aimed at frustrating the legal process.

The Supreme Court, in its remarks, expressed concern that the timing of the arrest was suspicious. It questioned whether the CBI's actions were motivated by a desire to prevent Kejriwal from obtaining bail, suggesting that such behaviour from a premier investigative agency could compromise the integrity of the judicial process. The court emphasised that agencies like the CBI must function independently and avoid being influenced by external pressures, especially when it involves cases against political leaders.

The bench also highlighted the need for fairness and impartiality in legal proceedings. The justices underscored that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done. They pointed out that any appearance of bias or misuse of authority by law enforcement agencies can erode public confidence in the legal system.

This case is not an isolated one. In recent years, there have been growing concerns about the use of investigative agencies, such as the CBI and ED, for political purposes. Critics have alleged that these agencies are being weaponized to target opposition leaders and stifle dissent. Such allegations have become a recurring theme in India's political landscape, leading to increasing scrutiny over the actions of these institutions.

The Supreme Court’s remarks serve as a stark reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and independence in law enforcement. The judiciary, as a guardian of the Constitution, plays a crucial role in ensuring that the legal process remains untainted by political motivations. As the case involving Kejriwal moves forward, it is expected that the court will continue to keep a close watch on the actions of both the CBI and ED to ensure a fair and just outcome. For more politics news in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter.

[6nikhilum6]

Supreme Court Grants Bail To Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal In Excise Policy Case

सत्यमेव जयते.. सत्य परेशान हो सकता है, पराजित नहीं। https://t.co/WCrQBkEluY — Atishi (@AtishiAAP) September 13, 2024 The CBI, represented by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, had opposed Kejriwal’s decision to bypass the trial court and directly approach the Delhi High Court for bail, later advancing to the Supreme Court. Kejriwal was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on March 21…

[tfgadgets]

What Court Said While Giving Arvind Kejriwal Bail

The court said perception also matters and CBI must dispel the notion of being a caged parrot. In a huge relief for Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal ahead of the Haryana elections, the Supreme Court has granted him bail in the Delhi excise policy case. The AAP chief will now be released from jail, six months after his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21. He was subsequently…

[mybharatguru]

Supreme Court refuses to grant interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal....

Supreme Court refuses to grant interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal. The Enforcement Directorate has registered a case against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal under various categories including money laundering, alleging that there was an irregularity in the liquor policy of the Delhi government. In this case, Arvind Kejriwal was arrested by the Enforcement Department on the night of March 21.…

[letsdiskuss-blog]

Arvind Kejriwal Granted Bail: Delhi CM Released Amidst Ongoing Excise Policy Controversy

Supreme Court's Interim Bail: On July 12, 2024, the Supreme Court granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a money laundering case linked to an alleged excise policy scam. This decision raised significant questions regarding the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) authority to arrest individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and emphasized the necessity of judicial scrutiny in such arrests.

Ongoing Legal Challenges: Despite the Supreme Court's interim bail, Kejriwal remains incarcerated due to a subsequent arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on June 26, 2024. The CBI has labeled him the "sutradhaar" (mastermind) of the liquor policy case, asserting that his arrest was crucial for the investigation.

Delhi High Court Proceedings: The Delhi High Court is currently deliberating on Kejriwal's bail plea in the CBI case. The court has reserved its judgment after hearing arguments from both the CBI, which claims to have substantial evidence against him, and Kejriwal's defense, which argues that the arrest is based on hearsay and lacks direct evidence.

Legal Implications: The Supreme Court's ruling has broader implications for the enforcement of the PMLA, particularly regarding the conditions under which arrests can be made. The court highlighted that the exercise of arrest powers must be carefully scrutinized to prevent misuse and to protect individual rights. Read more: https://www.letsdiskuss.com/arvind-kejriwal:-arrest-claims-supreme-court-battle-and-more

[taaza-khabar]

"Insurance Arrest": Response from Abhishek Singhvi Regarding CBI's Actions Against Arvind Kejriwal

New Delhi:Senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi has argued convincingly for his client, stating that politics heavily influences the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal by both the Enforcement Directorate and the CBI in connection with the alleged liquor policy scam, and criticizing the prosecution’s unconventional approach.During a private conversation with NDTV on Friday, Mr. Singhvi…

[petnews2day]

Arvind Kejriwal Bail News Live Updates: 'Trial court did not apply its mind', Delhi CM to remain in jail as HC stays bail order

New Post has been published on https://petn.ws/tmsww

Arvind Kejriwal Bail News Live Updates: 'Trial court did not apply its mind', Delhi CM to remain in jail as HC stays bail order

06:58 (IST), Jun 25 HC verdict on Kejriwal’s bail likely today Enforcement Directorate on Monday opposed chief minister Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea in the liquor policy case, calling the trial court’s order “illegal and perverse”. Responding in writing before Delhi high court, the chief minister said discretionary orders of bail cannot be set aside “merely […]

See full article at https://petn.ws/tmsww #OtherNews

[bhaskarlive]

SC to hear today CM Kejriwal’s plea against interim stay on bail

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Monday the plea moved by Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal against the interim stay ordered by the Delhi High Court on his release on bail in a money laundering case linked to the alleged liquor policy scam.

As per the supplementary causelist published on the website of the apex court, a vacation bench of Justices Manoj Misra and SVN Bhatti will hear the matter this noon.

Earlier, Kejriwal’s legal team sought an urgent hearing on his plea by the apex court.

In an interim direction, the Delhi High Court on June 21 stayed the release of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) supremo on the Enforcement Directorate’s plea challenging the trial court’s bail order.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[novumtimes]

Indian opposition leader Kejriwal granted bail

Arvind Kejriwal, an Indian opposition leader and New Delhi’s chief minister, has been granted bail by a court in the capital, after he was arrested in a bribery case in March. Kejriwal, the leader of the Aam Aadmi Party, or Common Man’s Party, was arrested in March, weeks before India’s general election, in which he was one of the challengers to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Modi returned to power for a third straight term earlier in June, even though his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party lost its majority. However, Modi’s National Democratic Alliance coalition won enough seats to form a government, with him at the helm. Kejriwal’s arrest was widely condemned by opposition parties who called it a political move by Modi’s government against one of his fiercest opponents during a general election. The New Delhi leader was given interim bail last month to campaign before going back to jail on June 2. He is expected to be released on Friday, one of Kejriwal’s lawyers told local media. On March 21, Kejriwal was arrested by the federal Enforcement Directorate, India’s main financial investigation agency. The agency, controlled by Modi’s government, accused his party and ministers of accepting one billion rupees ($A18 million) in bribes from liquor contractors nearly two years ago. The arrest triggered days of protests by party activists supported by other opposition parties. Kejriwal denied the accusations and called them a political conspiracy. His party is part of a broad alliance of opposition parties called INDIA, which was the main challenger to Modi during the election. While the federal agency accused Kejriwal of being a key conspirator in the liquor bribery case, the opposition parties accused the government of misusing federal investigation agencies to harass and weaken its political opponents. They pointed to a series of raids, arrests and corruption investigations of key opposition figures in the months before the election. Modi’s government denies using law enforcement agencies to target the opposition and says the agencies act independently. Kejriwal, a former civil servant, launched the AAP in 2012. He promised to rid the Indian political system and governance of corruption and inefficiency. The party’s symbol – a broom – and its promise to sweep the administration of graft struck a chord with New Delhi’s residents, fed up with runaway inflation and slow economic growth. Source link via The Novum Times

[nikkiadderley88]

Letsdiskuss:- Arvind Kejriwal: Arrest Claims, Supreme Court Battle & More

On March 21, 2023, Arvind Kejriwal took to Twitter and alleged that he could be arrested soon by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the Delhi excise policy case. This claim sparked a wave of reactions on social media, with supporters and critics weighing in on the matter. While Kejriwal's supporters rallied behind him, accusing the central government of political vendetta, his detractors dismissed the claims as a publicity stunt and an attempt to garner sympathy. The hashtags #IStandWithKejriwal and #KejriwalArrested trended on Twitter, reflecting the polarized opinions and the intense public scrutiny surrounding the issue. For more information:- letsdiskuss

[werindialive]

Major Relief By Supreme Court for Kejriwal in Delhi Liquor Policy Case 

In a major development, the Supreme Court of India has provided substantial relief to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the ongoing Delhi liquor policy case. The apex court's decision marks a significant turning point in the high-profile investigation that has dominated headlines for months. 

The court's ruling comes as a respite for Kejriwal, who has been facing intense scrutiny from central investigative agencies. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader has consistently maintained his innocence, claiming that the case against him is politically motivated. 

According to the court's order, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has been directed to reassess its approach to the investigation. The bench, comprising senior justices, emphasized the need for a fair and unbiased inquiry, cautioning against what it termed as "overreach" by investigative agencies. 

The Supreme Court's intervention follows a series of petitions filed by Kejriwal's legal team, challenging the manner in which the investigation was being conducted. The court expressed concerns over the procedural aspects of the probe, particularly the timing and nature of summonses issued to the Delhi Chief Minister. 

In its observations, the court stressed the importance of maintaining a balance between investigative imperatives and the rights of individuals under investigation. It noted that while corruption allegations must be thoroughly probed, the process should not impede the functioning of an elected government. 

The ruling has been met with mixed reactions across the political spectrum. AAP supporters have hailed it as a vindication of Kejriwal's stance, while opposition parties have called for a swift completion of the investigation to uncover the truth. 

Legal experts view this development as a significant check on the powers of investigative agencies. They suggest that the court's decision could have far-reaching implications for similar high-profile cases in the future. 

The Delhi liquor policy case, which alleges irregularities in the formulation and implementation of the city's excise policy, has been a contentious issue since its inception. The policy, introduced in 2021, was withdrawn following allegations of corruption and favoritism. 

As the case continues to unfold, all eyes will be on how investigative agencies respond to the Supreme Court's directives. The ruling is expected to reshape the trajectory of the investigation and potentially alter the political landscape in the national capital. 

For now, Kejriwal and his party have welcomed the court's decision, viewing it as a step towards clearing the air on what they claim to be baseless allegations. The coming weeks are likely to see further developments as the various stakeholders adjust to this new legal reality. 

For more political news India in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter!  

[market-news-24]

Today’s Current Affairs: Supreme Court Grants Arvind Kejriwal Interim Bail for Lok Sabha Election Campaign Amid claims and counter-claims by lawyers for the Enforcement Directorate and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal, the Supreme Court clarified that it had not made any exceptions while granting him interim bail until June 1 for the Lok Sabha election campaign. This comes after Union Home Minister Amit Shah mentioned that the grant of bail to Kejriwal was not a routine judgment, sparking debate on special treatment. The court welcomed critical analysis of the judgment while reiterating the fairness of its decision. Kejriwal's legal team, represented by Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, addressed the court's stance on the matter, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rule of law. The hearing continues as the ED presents objections regarding the maintainability of Kejriwal's petition. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story. [ad_2] Download Latest Movies in HD Quality Downloading In 15 seconds Scroll Down to End of This Post const downloadBtn = document.getElementById('download-btn'); const timerBtn = document.getElementById('timer-btn'); const downloadLinkBtn = document.getElementById('download-link-btn'); downloadBtn.addEventListener('click', () => downloadBtn.style.display = 'none'; timerBtn.style.display = 'block'; let timeLeft = 15; const timerInterval = setInterval(() => if (timeLeft === 0) clearInterval(timerInterval); timerBtn.style.display = 'none'; downloadLinkBtn.style.display = 'inline-block'; // Add your download functionality here console.log('Download started!'); else timerBtn.textContent = `Downloading In $timeLeft seconds`; timeLeft--; , 1000); ); [ad_1] 1. What did the Supreme Court say regarding the grant of interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal? a) It was a routine and normal judgment b) It was made due to special treatment c) Critical analysis of the judgment was not welcome d) It had not made any exception while granting him interim bail Answer: d) It had not made any exception while granting him interim bail 2. Who represented Arvind Kejriwal during the hearing against his arrest by the ED? a) Amit Shah b) Abhishek Manu Singhvi c) Tushar Mehta d) Sanjiv Khanna Answer: b) Abhishek Manu Singhvi 3. What did Solicitor General Tushar Mehta take exception to during the hearing? a) People's comments on Arvind Kejriwal's bail b) Delay in court proceedings c) Top minister's remarks d) Arvind Kejriwal's statement about returning to jail Answer: d) Arvind Kejriwal's statement about returning to jail 4. What did the Supreme Court mention in response to criticism of its judgment? a) Criticism was not allowed b) Different viewpoints were not welcomed c) Critical analysis was welcome d) No one could question the judgment Answer: c) Critical analysis was welcome [ad_2] What remarks did the Supreme Court make in response to claims and counter-claims by lawyers for the Enforcement Directorate and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal? The Supreme Court stated that it had not made any exception while granting interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal for the Lok Sabha election campaign and welcomed critical analysis or criticism of the judgment. What did Union Home Minister Amit Shah say regarding the grant of interim bail to Kejriwal? Amit Shah mentioned that the grant of interim bail to Kejriwal was not a routine judgment and many people believe that he had been given special treatment. How did Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi counter the claims made by the Enforcement Directorate? Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, referred to the remarks of a top minister of the government and countered the claims made by the Enforcement Directorate before the bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta. What statement did Mehta make regarding Kejriwal's reported remark about not having to return to jail if people vote for the AAP?

Mehta mentioned that people say Kejriwal will have to go back to jail in 20 days and that his reported remark about not having to return to jail if people vote for the AAP was inappropriate. What did the bench of Justices Khanna and Datta emphasize regarding the order granting interim bail to Kejriwal? The bench emphasized that the order granting interim bail was clear and fixed timelines for bail and surrender, stating that they did not make any exception for anyone and passed the order based on what they felt was justified. [ad_1] Download Movies Now Searching for Latest movies 20 seconds Sorry There is No Latest movies link found due to technical error. Please Try Again Later. function claimAirdrop() document.getElementById('claim-button').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'block'; let countdownTimer = 20; const countdownInterval = setInterval(function() document.getElementById('countdown').textContent = countdownTimer; countdownTimer--; if (countdownTimer < 0) clearInterval(countdownInterval); document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('sorry-button').style.display = 'block'; , 1000); [ad_2] In today's current affairs, the Supreme Court clarified that there were no exceptions made while granting interim bail to AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal for his Lok Sabha election campaign. This statement came after Union Home Minister Amit Shah suggested that Kejriwal received special treatment. The court welcomed criticism of its judgment and stated that it stood by its decision. The hearing on the ED's objections to Kejriwal's petition continued, with the bench emphasizing that courts can intervene if there is a violation of arrest conditions. The court also questioned the ED on ignoring beneficial witness statements in Kejriwal's case. The ASG mentioned that the AAP will be added as an accused in the case. This development highlights the ongoing legal battle surrounding Kejriwal's arrest by the ED. [ad_1]

[currentmediasstuff]

Today in Politics: Haryana Crisis and Modi's Campaign Trail

As tensions rise in Haryana, the fate of the BJP government hangs in the balance. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to address rallies in Maharashtra, Telangana, and hold a roadshow in Odisha.

PM Modi’s packed schedule includes a series of rallies and roadshows across three states. Starting with a rally in Nandurbar, Maharashtra, he’ll then move to Telangana for two more rallies before heading to Bhubaneswar for a roadshow.

In other campaign news, the Election Commission has ordered re-election at four booths following a mishap involving electronic voting machines in Uttar Pradesh. Samajwadi Party’s Akhilesh Yadav will also campaign in Kannauj, Kanpur Nagar, and Kanpur Dehat.

Meanwhile, BJP leaders JP Nadda, Amit Shah, and Rajnath Singh are all set for rallies in various states including Haryana, Jharkhand, West Bengal, and Odisha.

In Haryana, the Congress seeks to meet the Governor amidst a brewing crisis, with three Independent MLAs withdrawing support from the BJP government.

In a separate development, the Enforcement Directorate opposes interim bail for Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in a money-laundering case, highlighting the contentious issue of campaigning during legal proceedings.

Additionally, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar is slated to visit religious sites in Ayodhya.

Stay tuned for more updates on today’s political landscape.

[tfgadgets]

"Bail Is 'Normal Practice' For Women", K Kavitha Argues In Supreme Court

BRS leader K Kavitha was arrested in the Delhi liquor policy scam by the ED on March 15 (File). New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted conditional bail to Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha following her arrest – by the Enforcement Directorate in March and the Central Bureau of Investigation a month later – in the Delhi liquor policy scam, in which Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal…