Moiraine for the blorbo chart? 🙏
Hello, I realise that some of these may be contradictory but listen, I was switching between my Doylist and Watsonian hats while making this and now I am too tired to give more cohesive answers. In short, I enjoy that the narrative is giving her such a tough time, as well as the privilege to be the maker of her own demise, but...
She's (canonically) very little and you are hurting her.
Thank you for playing!
Send me blorbos and I'll rate them.
6 notes
·
View notes
Question arising from one of your miasma posts: at least one of those acts that would cause miasma is the *contemplation* of an act. If someone gets intrusive thoughts imagining miasmic acts that they absolutely do NOT wish to perform or even think about... would that generate miasma regardless? (Tbh either way purification would probably feel good lol)
I don’t think that would generate miasma, but this issue is right in the muddy territory between “religious belief” and “ancient cultural tradition”. The Ancient Greeks didn’t have the understanding of mental illness that we do now, and as a result, it was considered to be a curse, or generally something impure. In Euripides’ Hippolytos, Phaedra’s condition is described (by herself and others) as madness: the chorus asks her (141-150) if she is possessed by Pan or Hekate, or if she has been cursed by the Korybantes, Kybele or Diktynna, all deities associated with madness. In addition to this, as Phaedra laments and finally confesses her lust for Hippolytos, she speaks partly in the Doric dialect, which is often used by characters in a disturbed frenzy (like Kassandra in the Agamemnon).
At the same time, the descriptions point towards Phaedra suffering from something similar to what we would call intrusive thoughts. She is certainly unwilling to be experiencing lust for Hippolytos, and unwilling to act on it too. This affects her religiously, as miasma. But again, I would argue that this is the result of an ancient understanding of how our minds work, according to which mental illness is not a brain malfunction but a curse of the Gods. (The same goes for physical illness, too: severely disfigured people were considered to be miasmic, because their physical condition was taken as a reflection of their soul.) This understanding sucks, it’s outdated, and I firmly believe it’s not something we need to reconstruct in our religious practise.
That said, I do think there is some truth behind it. Illness, both mental and physical, is a sign that something in the body isn’t quite working like it should. This something is not morally wrong; it just needs to be, if not cured, at least treated so it interferes as little as possible with our daily life. As a religious person, I believe it is useful to take a holistic approach to health issues by seeing a doctor or therapist for everyday treatment, and also by practising ritual purifications to reduce the spiritual ramifications of said health issues.
I don’t believe the Gods judge us for our illnesses. I don’t believe intrusive, unwanted thoughts cause miasma (though they could if you genuinely want to act on them). But like you say, purification is a useful tool - if anything, so we can help ourselves into a state of mind more suited to worship.
31 notes
·
View notes