#cheap divorce

[uncontesteddocuments]

In Kansas divorce, how successful are your clients using your service?

100% successful, when uncontested and they complete the step-by-step for processing. We proudly have 90 of 90 5-star reviews here on our Google platform.

Kansas Divorce | $435 Excludes Filing Fee Add $122 More w/ Minor Child

Uncontested Documents 801 E. Douglas Ave., 2nd Fl. Wichita, KS 67202 (316) 312-4748 | Call or Text https://www.uncontesteddocuments.com uncontesteddocuments@gmail.com

Since 2011, Thank You Grateful To Be Of Service

[jenniferwest]

The Benefits of Uncontested Divorce

Today, most states offer couples the option of a simple uncontested divorcement. In fact, most couples choose this method of divorcing. It's simple, cheap, and both the parties are protected from their dignity.

It is costly to divorce. But if you are going through the process, uncontested divorce can help you save money and time. It's already difficult. You don't have the right to make the divorce contentious, unless you absolutely need to.

An uncontested divorce might not be the best option if you have a lot of contentious issues (e.g., child custody) in your marriage. You'll need to protect your rights as well as those of your children. An uncontested divorce might not be possible in certain states if children are involved.

An uncontested divorce can be made if you are on good terms with your soon-to be ex-spouse and are not married. If issues like child custody and support are settled between you, it will be easier. While divorce is not an easy process, it can be less painful if the divorce proceedings are uncontested.

Privacy is an important aspect of divorce. If you both want them to remain public, the disclosures that you make to each others are not required to be made public. You will need to make the agreement public, but it is not mandatory.

A contested divorce, on the other hand, will have every little detail of the divorce publically because spouses involved in major legal battles make these things public records. You can choose to keep your privacy by working out the details of your divorce and making the final agreements public. This is also easier for your kids.

It's okay to think that you are unable to negotiate an uncontested separation with your spouse. Perhaps you can't. However, it is important that you and your spouse are aware of the potential problems an uncontested divorce could help you avoid. The spouse who isn't ready for an uncontested divorce may be convinced by simply being faced with the differences in how to navigate through one.

You don't need to agree on why the divorce is occurring to make it an uncontested one. To have an uncontested divorce, you only need to agree on the terms. At first glance, you may think that it is impossible to have an uncontested divorcement.

You may decide that an uncontested divorcement is better for you, after some time and tempers have subsided. You can think about it. Consider the financial and emotional costs. Then, decide if uncontested divorce would be the best option.

[winteriron-trash]

rdj the (whitewashed) electric boogaloo

This is a reminder to everyone who's excited about RDJ's casting as Doctor Doom that this casting is whitewashing. Victor Von Doom is a Romani character and has been a Romani character since his introduction in the 1960s. (Fantastic Four Annual #2 [1964]) Not only that, but his Roma identity and the persecution he and his family faced due to it is integral to his character, it is what forms his identity. (Books of Doom by Ed Brubaker) Even if on the off chance this casting is meant to not be Victor but instead be some variant of Tony or whomever else becoming Doctor Doom, it is damaging to the character to rob him of that important cultural background. Doctor Doom does not exist without that history. Fans have been pushing hard to cast Doom as a Romani actor for years, especially since the MCU has whitewashed other Romani characters. (Wanda, Pietro, etc) This casting is not a celebration moment, it's fucking heartbreaking that the MCU repeatedly ignores the important and nuanced cultural backstories of characters.

I know I can't change anybody's mind on whether or not you want to be excited about RDJ's return to the MCU. But I do think at the very least you should be mad that the MCU is baiting us all and destroying nuanced and interesting characters for the sake of self-referential easter eggs and nostalgia bait. Because that's what it is. Feel how you'd like to feel about RDJ's return, but personally, this is soul-sucking. I had such a deep love for the MCU as a teenager, it was obviously something incredibly formative to me, especially Tony Stark. This isn't recreating what I fell in love with the MCU for. This is turning a well-planned and artistic storyline of adaptations into cheap cash grabs and fan service. Because, I think we're past the point of being able to call the MCU an adaptation of anything. They can use existing characters' names and powers, but to say they're being properly adapted is laughable.

This is not an adaptation of Doctor Doom. This is RDJ the Electric Boogaloo because Marvel's fear of losing the interest of dedicated MCU fans overrides their willingness to tell stories that are genuine to the characters. I don't know what there is to be excited about that. The MCU has lost its authenticity and aside from a few projects, feels heartless. Every movie is a copy of a copy. This announcement isn't something celebratory, it feels like a death knell of a cinematic universe that's so desperate to cling to relevancy it's resorting to nostalgia for a character/actor who hasn't even been dead for a decade. We're not getting anything new, we're just rinsing and repeating the same song and dance.

I get it. I love Tony Stark, his death destroyed me and I to this day, rue the ending he got in Endgame. It misunderstood his arc and it robbed him of a satisfying conclusion. But the solution to that isn't dragging the corpse out of the grave five years later to whitewash an existing character with rich and interesting nuance, just to forcibly tie his existence in the MCU to Tony. Whether he is a variant or not. Why would you want someone else's fave's legacy to be destroyed simply so your fave's legacy can go on? Hell, if we were really all so hellbent on the return of RDJ and/or Tony to the MCU, we have the multiverse for a reason. There were other ways to do it that didn't whitewash and ruin someone else. This just. Isn't something to be happy about.

[decoy-sammy]

Is this anything?

[Sound on!!]

What-re you making, FIRE over there?

[pinokkyoisdead]

happy Mizurui Week 2024!

Day 1: Adulthood

[rosefinnigen]

also this is such a weird beef for me to soap box/vague about but like this is my blog & it’s past my bedtime who gives a fuck. Anyway very specific type of dude comes on here and complains about “scammers” but clearly means “online sex workers not interested in fucking me personally for free”. be fucking for real dude most of us are not here to find dates we are here to work and be hot & if you don’t want to pay that’s whatever but providing specific services and accepting or asking for compensation for them is not a scam it’s a JOB

oh wow she asked you for money? the online sex worker asked you for money and only wanted to interact online? she didn’t feel like meeting you, a complete stranger, in person, for free? wow how surprising. like grow the fuck up dude. what a fucking tragedy, someone asked you for money rather than graciously appreciating the GIFT that is your gaze on our whore titties.oh it poisoned the experience for you? that the person you jack off to is also a human with bills to pay? get fucking real

[daisyachain]

Restorative or Transformative?: Homoerotic Subtext, The Closet, and Ciphers in Pop Culture. The nature of commercial art is that it’s sometimes bad and inconsistent. Notably it’s also misogynistic. One way in which audiences try to reconcile massive plot holes or gaps in character motivation is by reading secrets or hidden information into a plot.

Commonly, male characters are interpreted as closeted gay or bisexual to reconcile the absence of women from commercial narratives with the generally stunted and poorly-written male characters that form the focus on said texts. This reading has become especially common among a non-heterosexual milieu. Rather than transforming the original text into some radically different new form, this closeted interpretation seeks to make the original text stand on its own as a story rather than a Swiss cheese of dumb writing decisions.

This interpretation only works for a specific type of pop, usually genre fiction. Any story in which tortured male leads eschew women in favour of male-male bonds (because female characters are constantly killed off, written sparsely, or written out, because the production team keeps casting their male buddies, because actors demand to keep having scenes with their bros, whatever) can become a sounder structure if you put one of them in a closet.

The gay interpretation is the natural consequence of shoddy misogynistic writing from ventures like Supernatural, Naruto, all the biggest hits. It’s also the natural consequence of more benignly misogynistic writing like The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes or The Lord of the Rings, where women aren’t necessarily rejected but are simply absent from the worlds of the protagonists. When the emotional crux of the story falls on male-male interactions, this reads as romantic because society at large priorities (definitively heterosexual) romance as the pinnacle of human connection. Two forces are in conflict, the primacy of heterosexuality (read as: romance) and the primacy of men.

Anyway. All that is to say that the typical gay or bisexual reading of male characters in pop fiction comes from a very real place. But, in some places, that’s the default interpretation. Angst, insecurity, secrets, double lives, fatigue, disappointment, restrained passion, stunted personal growth, anyone living in the closet can tell you that it impacts and defines your whole life to know that you live in a way fundamentally incompatible with The Proper Way that life is structured around down to tax law and superstore prices (which assume a heterosexual nuclear family unit). Characters in fiction also tend to have personal problems because that makes them interesting and tasty.

If you’ve grown up on stories with the specific type of misogyny that can be papered over with a closeted interpretation of the male leads, carrying this interpretation over to any male character will make sense more often than not. Even a bit of angst or insecurity? Well of course that makes sense if a character is closeted.

Except that’s hurt a normal part of fiction, and sometimes the closeted interpretation takes away from the point of a character. If a male character is on another axis of marginalization, the closeted interpretation imposed by the slash reading community downplays or trivializes the effects of that marginalization in the plot by overwriting it with another type of marginalization. Alternately, sometimes a character’s heterosexuality is a part of the story. There are some sorts of critiques or investigations of misogyny or masculinity that don’t work if the character has an ‘opt out’ of the cisheteropatriarchal perspective. Not that gay/bisexual men aren’t except from misogyny, but misogyny masculinity and heterosexuality are so tightly linked that it sort of defeats the point if you interpret that character outside of heterosexuality.

All that is to say—the closet interpretation is a quick and easy spice to apply to the weaker parts of action-adventure genre fiction to make it taste better. It draws from a large enough sample of art that it’s pretty widely applicable. Because of that, it’s part of some people’s [my] default interpretation package just because the semi-dull macho show at least gets less dull if you imagine there’s a reason for there to be no girls besides simple hatred. That then forms its own problem where the interpretation that works with your average genre work gets then blanket-applied to all genre works and obscures the places where the closet interpretation doesn’t fix the work, and actually makes it less interesting.

[branmer]

went on reddit briefly and the first post i see is some rich cunt who bought a house for 500k complaining that the social housing tenants across the road let their kids play in the street. like. my god oh no, kids outside playing!!! what a jackass

[lottieurl]

i make. Drumroll. roughly 10k usd per year. so this discourse is so insane to witness

[uncontesteddocuments]

Why are no-fault divorces much lower priced than placing blame?

In a no-fault divorce, the filing spouse requests a divorce based on one of the state's no-fault legal grounds. Every state has its own grounds for no-fault divorce, but the most common include:

separation irreconcilable differences irretrievable breakdown, and incompatibility. The filing spouse does not have to claim that there has been any marital misconduct in order to get a no-fault divorce. Instead, the spouse needs to tell the court only that the marriage is over and there's nothing they can do to reconcile it. As long as the spouses meet the state's other divorce requirements, the court will approve the divorce. | Source of Information: divorcenet

No-Fault Divorce $365 | Serving All Kansas (Many States Too) Excludes Court Filing Fee Add $122 w/ Minor Child(ren)

Uncontested Documents https://www.uncontesteddocuments.com (316) 312-4748 | Talk or Text 801 E. Douglas Ave., 2nd Fl., Wichita Inside Regus Office Center Entrance West Side Building

Since 2011, Thank You Grateful To Be Of Service

[ethereiling]

i have many issues with things like cottagecore and similar ~aesthetics~ that other people have summarized better and more succinctly but something that continuously bothers me is how it ties into the Rich White Person With A Lot Of Free Time vibe and how much that conflicts with the things i do that would align with certain aesthetics

like im not making stuff for followers or for a pristine Country Vibe that doesnt actually involve hard work im doing it because im poor and dont have the money to buy it, generally. im painting cans to plant green onions in because i dont have spare money for pots. i want to learn to make paper because my apartment doesnt have recycling and i dont want my scrap paper to go to waste. im sewing fringe on a thrift store jacket so i can make a pretty outfit for a wedding without having to buy formal attire new. idk i just think that too much of instagram aesthetics are centered around leisure and money that often dont exist in the people those aesthetics are trying to emulate

[dreamlogic]

...

[jonny-b-meowborn]

Shout out to the time one classmate in high school shamed me for frequently eating and enjoying spaghetti with sauce from store bought powder. I'm glad your parents always had the money, time and energy to cook all meals from scratch, good for you, but not everyone has that

[brokentoys]

remember when this blog heavily critiqued ark city and when they started critiquing eddie and they literally went on to describe my depiction

[something-tofightfor]

I don’t understand the Dave York thirst (aside from the obvious parts of the movie like when he’s in that beanie and when he lays down on the observation tower) and at this point I’m too afraid to ask someone to explain it to me.

[occasional-musings]

The Dark Lord is strolling around Stick City.

**sees Chosen's wanted poster on the wall**

The Dark Lord: huh, that's cute. They got a wanted poster out for you, huh?

The Dark Lord: how much is the reward?

**reads**

The Dark Lord: Huh?!? Only that much?!? Oh that is insulting. You know what? Lemme--

**takes out a marker and adds three extra zeroes to the reward on the poster**

The Dark Lord: much better.