#georgetown marriage license | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

meganbickelcounseling · 1 year

Text

Website: https://www.meganbickelcounseling.org/

Address: Georgetown, Texas, USA

Megan Bickel Counseling, led by Megan Bickel, offers individual, marital, and family counseling with a Christian perspective.

About Megan:

Megan, a Licensed Professional Counselor since 2004, is dedicated to supporting her clients' well-being. She facilitates emotional and relational awareness, mental healing, and peace through talk therapy. Megan works with you to identify and clarify issues, explore options, develop strategies, and increase self-awareness.

As a licensed therapist with a background in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and EMDR therapy, Megan's role is to understand and accept every client while challenging thoughts, behaviors, and beliefs that may be hurting or hindering them. She believes that true restoration requires a heart change and spiritual health. Contact Megan to book a session and start your journey towards healing.

Megan offers the following services:

Individual Psychotherapy: Gain self-awareness and a more accurate perception of life situations to transform your outlook on yourself and others.

Family & Marital Therapy: Find a path to peace for you, your spouse, and/or your family.

Licensed Professional Counselor Supervisor: Megan, licensed for 17 years, provides supervision for novice counselors, supporting their growth in the mental health field.

Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/megan-bickel-486ab08/

Keywords : relationship counseling near me emdr therapy near me licensed professional counselor family counseling services small talk speech therapy therapeutic interventions talk therapy near me licensed therapist near me marital therapy near me emotional healing online relationship counseling mindfulness based therapy marital therapy family counseling services near me licensed therapists licensed therapists near me individual psychotherapy emotional healing scriptures therapeutic crisis intervention body talk therapy healing from emotional abuse online talk therapy talk therapy online free relationship counselling online online talking therapy grief and loss therapy licensed physical therapists licensed professional counselor near me developing self awareness spiritual and emotional healing therapeutic intervention services emotional healing retreat near me black relationship counseling near me long distance relationship counseling relationship counseling for men licensed social worker therapist licensed professional mental health counselor coping with life changes and transitions therapist for stress and anxiety online licensed therapist therapy for grief and loss marriage relationship counseling therapeutic interventions for adhd therapeutic interventions for grief self-awareness child development couples relationship counselling dual relationships counseling female led relationship counseling healing relationships counseling behavioral marital therapy online family counseling services trauma focused counseling therapist for anxiety and stress near me therapist for stress and anxiety near me spiritual mental health counseling developing emotional self awareness self awareness and development mindful based cognitive therapy mindfulness based cognitive therapy near me mindfulness based therapy near me mindfulness based therapy training cognitive behavioral marital therapy family marital therapy integrative marital therapy intensive marital therapy online marital therapy sexual marital therapy licensed christian therapist licensed christian therapist near me licensed couples therapist licensed marriage therapist licensed marriage therapist near me licensed mental health therapist near me individual psychotherapy near me art therapy for grief and loss best therapy for grief and loss group therapy for grief and loss music therapy for grief and loss play therapy for grief and loss family therapy psychotherapy family therapy vs individual psychotherapy associates in psychotherapy and family counseling lotus psychotherapy counseling & family services family life counseling services focus on the family counseling services jewish family services grief counseling non profit family counseling services virtual family counseling services coping with life transitions coping with transitions in life therapist for anxiety and stress behavioural marital therapy family and marital therapy ppt family therapy and psychotherapy treatment process psychotherapy family therapy spiritual health counseling art therapy directives for grief and loss existential therapy grief and loss family therapy grief and loss grief and loss group therapy near me grief and loss therapy for children grief and loss therapy for elderly bowen family therapy psychotherapy family therapy in psychotherapy genesis psychotherapy & family therapy services individual psychotherapy and family therapy individual psychotherapy vs family therapy

#relationship counseling near me #emdr therapy near me #licensed professional counselor #family counseling services #small talk speech therapy #therapeutic interventions #talk therapy near me #licensed therapist near me #marital therapy near me #emotional healing

1 note · View note

lawyerbd · 2 years

Text

জমি বিক্রয় দলিল কিভাবে করবেন আর দেখতে কেমন হবে, তার একটি নমুনা ছবি আকারে দেওয়া হয়েছে। জমি বিক্রয় দলিল ফাইনটি এম এস অফিস ফরমেট আকারে দেওয়া হয়েছে। জমি বিক্রয় দলিল ফাইলটি আপনি আপনার মন মত এডিটিং করতে পারবেন।

#duplicate marriage license #marry online certificate #my marriage certificate #register marriage certificate online #temple marriage registration #nmmc marriage registration #reorder marriage certificate #married certificate online #macomb marriage license #marriage license staten island #printable marriage license #marriage registration certificate union council #wedding license cost #vivah nondani online #family history marriage certificates #georgetown marriage license

0 notes

whittlebaggett8 · 5 years

Text

US-China Trade Talks: High Risk, High Stakes

Insights from James Eco-friendly.

Trans-Pacific Watch author Mercy Kuo consistently engages subject-issue professionals, policy practitioners, and strategic thinkers throughout the world for their varied insights into U.S. Asia coverage. This conversation with James Green – the creator and host of Georgetown University’s U.S.-China Dialogue Podcast, a Senior Advisor at McLarty Associates, and former Minister Counselor for Trade Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing (2013-2018) – is the 187th in ”The Trans-Pacific Watch Perception Sequence.”

What crucial aspects contributed to the breakdown in U.S.-China trade talks?

Properly, I’m not certain we’re rather at the position of breakdown. Clearly when Chinese Vice Premier Liu He frequented Washington Might 9-10, there was not a splitthrough in the trade negotiations in conditions of inking an agreement, but the two sides are nevertheless talking even with the U.S. go to boost tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese exports from 10 per cent to 25 percent. Each and every trade negotiation has an ebb and move, a rhythm, a again-and-forth like a perfectly-choreographed Peking Opera. And my feeling is the Chinese aspect misjudged where by the negotiations ended up at the starting of May well. The good converse of reaching an agreement by the time of Liu He’s new go to may perhaps have specified Beijing officers overconfidence that some items which the U.S. thought shut have been open to even further reinterpretation. There is also the genuine chance that incomplete coordination inside the Chinese governing administration — among ministries and then with areas of the senior leadership — led to a mishandling of United States Trade Consultant (USTR) Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s late April negotiation spherical in Beijing. At the core, endeavours to liberalize the Chinese economic climate to profit U.S. businesses and Chinese customers have encountered orchestrated opposition from vested passions, which do not see a require to transform aspects of Chinese condition capitalism.

Having fun with this write-up? Click on listed here to subscribe for complete obtain. Just $5 a thirty day period.

Describe the in the vicinity of- and lengthy-time period effects of the U.S. tariff hike to 25 per cent on American individuals and industries.

The $200 billion worthy of of products that will be less than 25 % tariffs as of about June 1 have been already subject to a 10 % tariffs less than the before getting of the Portion 301 investigation that Chinese forced technological innovation transfer policies harm U.S. professional pursuits. A lot of of those people goods are industrial and light-manufactured merchandise that are used as inputs for U.S. factories, builders, and company organizations. The tariffs are a tax paid at the port of entry by the U.S. importer to U.S. Customs. So that 15 share stage distinction may possibly be reflected in increased costs for U.S. businesses and end-buyers of individuals items, or reduce income for Chinese exporters. For people, a much larger impact will be felt if further tariffs are positioned on the remaining approximately $350 billion of Chinese exports to the U.S. USTR is reportedly starting the necessary notice-and-comment period for all those proposed new tariffs on new goods.

Assess the possibility calculus driving China’s retaliation.

To date, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce has publicly taken a calibrated approach to the most current spherical of U.S. tariff increases, stating that China would get “necessary countermeasures” on May well 9. On Could 13, the Chinese Ministry of Finance stated that as of June 1, $60 billion of U.S. imports would be subject matter to tariffs of 20 or 25 p.c ̶ up from a 10 per cent tariff amount from prior rounds of tit-for-tat tariffs. Chinese officials are on the lookout to sign resolve from the improved U.S. tariffs and to hurt certain sectors of the U.S. overall economy that could deliver the U.S. administration to conclude a trade agreement ̶ yet the trade imbalance in China’s favor would make a dollar-for-dollar retaliation unattainable. Chinese officers may sluggish approvals of licenses for U.S. corporations or to import specified agricultural products, but at this stage are unlikely to advocate for a standard boycott of U.S. solutions or providers. The Chinese authorities nevertheless seeks foreign investment decision, notably in new technologies.

What is at stake for Presidents Trump and Xi in conditions of successful leadership?

Communist Party Normal Secretary and PRC President Xi Jinping was not elected to workplace, but just about every Chinese leader since Deng Xiaoping has been evaluated internally, in component, by appropriately taking care of the bilateral marriage with the United States. For President Xi, at a moment when he is leading China’s ever more muscular international policy and tightening of political place at household, obtaining a superior relationship with the United States is a crucial instrument for his other foreign and domestic aims. President Donald Trump has lauded his particular romantic relationship with President Xi whilst at the similar time pushing for a more durable method to perceived imbalances in the bilateral investing partnership.

Evaluate regardless of whether U.S.-China strategic rivalry will intensify and the policy implications for U.S. organizations.

Buckle up, since there will be turbulence in advance for the U.S.-China romantic relationship. Basic Secretary Xi Jinping’s January 2017 Davos speech that China has a model for other nations to emulate and the U.S. National Protection Tactic in December 2017 ̶ boldly stating that “China and Russia obstacle American electricity, impact, and pursuits, attempting to erode American security and prosperity” ̶ set the stage for friction in the armed forces, cyber, know-how, human resources, trade, and security domains. Providers will have to regulate ̶ by diversifying source chains, closely looking at tighter rules on U.S. export controls and on Chinese financial commitment, and making sure the right footprint in China to get ready for particular sectors that may possibly liberalize as a final result of any trade agreement. All that reported, wise statesmen and women of all ages from equally international locations will continue on to lookup for areas of overlapping passions and will progress insurance policies to improve the lives of Americans, Chinese, and citizens all around the planet.

The post US-China Trade Talks: High Risk, High Stakes appeared first on Defence Online.

from WordPress https://defenceonline.com/2019/05/14/us-china-trade-talks-high-risk-high-stakes/

#China tariffs #China-U.S. trade talks #China-US trade war #Liu He #Trans-Pacific View #Trump trade p

0 notes

mcdouglecompany-blog · 5 years

Text

Heaven on Earth: The Rise, Fall, and Afterlife of Socialism, 10 Ways to Debunk Transgenderism and Same Sex Marriage, Abortion Preached to Kids and Mormon Exceptionalism by AEI

Heaven on Earth: The Rise, Fall, and Afterlife of Socialism

Abortion preached to kids - Lila Rose on Tucker Carlson

10 Ways to Debunk Transgender Ideology & Protect the Family 8 Reasons to Stop Cussing

10 Reasons Why You Should Oppose Same-Sex "Marriage"

Mormon exceptionalism in 60 Seconds by the American Enterprise Institute.

‘Heaven on Earth’ by Joshua Murvachik

John J. Miller is joined by Joshua Murvachik to discuss his book, 'Heaven on Earth.'

Heaven on Earth: The Rise, Fall, and Afterlife of Socialism

by Joshua Muravchik

Overview of the Book-

Socialism was man's most ambitious attempt to supplant religion with a doctrine claiming to ground itself in “science.” Each failure to create societies of abundance or give birth to “the New Man” inspired more searching for the path to the promised land: revolution, communes, social democracy, communism, fascism, Arab socialism, African socialism. None worked, and some exacted a staggering human toll. Then, after two centuries of wishful thinking and bitter disappointment, socialism imploded in a fin de siècle drama of falling walls and collapsing regimes. It was an astonishing denouement but what followed was no less astonishing. After the hiatus of a couple of decades, new voices were raised, as if innocent of all that had come before, proposing to try it all over again. Joshua Muravchik traces the pursuit of this phantasm, presenting sketches of the thinkers and leaders who developed the theory, led it to power, and presided over its collapse, as well as those who are trying to revive it today. Heaven on Earth is a story filled with character and event while at the same time giving us an epic chronicle of a movement that tried to turn the world upside down—and for a time succeeded.

Abortion preached to kids - Lila Rose on Tucker Carlson

https://youtu.be/CsgzLW1_Nxs

Live Action

Published on Jan 16, 2019

Lila Rose joins Tucker Carlson to discuss a video in which "Shout Your Abortion" founder Amelia Bonow preaches abortion to kids. Learn more: https://www.liveaction.org/

10 Ways to Debunk Transgender Ideology & Protect the Family -- FIGHT BACK

https://youtu.be/Ghr848MmnB4

TFP Student Action

Published on Jan 6, 2017

Read the full article at: https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/blog... ATTRIBUTIONS: 1. Divertissement by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/ 2. Grave Matters by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/ 3. Dreams Become Real by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/ 4. Darkest Child by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/ 5. Dark Times by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/

8 Reasons to Stop Cussing

https://youtu.be/h1m8jxs4JdM

TFP Student Action

Published on Apr 18, 2017

It's time to FIGHT BACK against the foul language that is so prevalent in our culture today. Here are 8 reasons to STOP cussing: https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/blog... Attributions for music used in this video: 1. Impromptu in Blue by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/ 2. Dreams Become Real by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/ 3. Harlequin by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: http://incompetech.com/

10 Reasons Why You Should Oppose Same-Sex "Marriage"

https://youtu.be/gnVWJPeBIzo

TFP Student Action

Published on Feb 16, 2015

http://www.tfpstudentaction.org/ -- Young Americans are not about to allow the sacred institution of marriage to be thrown under the bus by the homosexual movement. In fact, TFP Student Action has just launched a new educational video that makes a powerful case against the imposition of homosexual unions in our culture. The urgent need for this educational video became apparent after TFP Student Action volunteers visited institutions of higher learning such as Brown, Berkeley and George Washington University and found students ill-equipped to stand up for true marriage. "Marriage is being debated across the nation, especially on college campuses, so we decided to make a video that would help students defend natural marriage in a serious and respectful way," said TFP volunteer Matthew Miller, 20. "The video is really useful right now because activist judges are playing God, thinking they have the power to change the definition and nature of true marriage. They don't. And this video proves it." Liberal professors only present one side of the issue -- the wrong side, the politically correct position. The truth is rarely heard in the classroom. But this TFP video puts moral correctness above political correctness, challenging the falsehood of the homosexual movement. "Even at Catholic universities like Georgetown, students are not given good reasons to oppose same-sex 'marriage,'" said Miller. "Only the misleading talking points of the homosexual agenda get parroted everywhere -- in class, out of class, on TV and in the newspapers. So I'm sure this video will help lots of students understand why they should stand up to defend marriage and family." Please share this video with your friends. Send it to every college student you know. Help us outsmart liberal professors and save the sacred institution of marriage and family.

AEI IN 60 SECONDS S4 • E11

Mormon exceptionalism | IN 60 SECONDS

Watch this short video at- https://youtu.be/atc5fTmdhN4

American Enterprise Institute

Published on Mar 7, 2019

POLL — Is the decline of religion in the United States a good thing or a bad thing? https://bit.ly/2VFm9F5 In an era marked by religious decline, Mormons have held their own particularly well. AEI's Daniel A. Cox breaks down the factors that have kept the Mormon population alive and well for so long. ARTICLE — Most churches are losing members fast — but not the Mormons. Here’s why. https://bit.ly/2H2SiTV SOURCE — Mormons more likely to marry, have more children than other U.S. religious groups https://goo.gl/XKypti SOURCE — Mormons and Family Life https://goo.gl/4K418M SOURCE — Religious Landscape Study: The Unaffiliated https://goo.gl/B1us9D Subscribe to AEI's YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/AEIVideo... Like us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/AEIonline Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/AEI For more information http://www.aei.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

HELP US SPREAD THE WORD!

Please send to friends, post on Facebook, twitter, etc…

Over 3,000 commercial free archived shows are available on our podcast site here.

Ways to subscribe to the American Conservative University Podcast

Click here to subscribe via iTunes

Click here to subscribe via RSS

You can also subscribe via Stitcher

You can also subscribe via SoundCloud

Listen to ACU on PlayerFM

If you like this episode head on over to iTunes and kindly leave us a rating, a review and subscribe! People find us through our good reviews.

FEEDBACK + PROMOTION

You can ask your questions, make comments, submit ideas for shows and lots more. Let your voice be heard.

Download our FREE iOS App.

Download our FREE Android App.

Email us at americanconservativeuniversity@americanconservativeuniversity.com

Click here to download the episode

0 notes

clubofinfo · 7 years

Text

Expert: I am constantly amazed in this day and age where Americans have a President who touts anything he doesn’t agree with as “fake news” that is the moment that people grow cynical of the term. Despite Donald Trump’s ability to shun astute critique of his politics, the term does carry currency in terms of how true or false news stories are. But it is not just American media that is stuck within this paradigm of readers never knowing what is or is not true, the British who have a nationally subsidized media whereby residents in the UK must pay a TV license are subjected to another sort of “fake news,” namely, the endless stream of trivia regarding the Royal Family. What is “news” today can range from the entirely vapid stories of an impending Royal Wedding to the recent story of a pedophile found in his cell with his penis chopped off. The former is entirely not newsworthy and stokes the fire of many British who resist paying television taxes because of this sort of abuse of public funds to cover “fluff” and the latter is largely untrue. Yet, both stories are widespread because who doesn’t want to read about a pedophile who has come to his just-deserved end or the happy royal marriage between a Hollywood actor and a prince? And this is why fake news has become so prevalent: the market forces of advertisement rewards social media shares. Conterminous to this reality of capitalism and social media there is a recent study published in Science last week, untrue stories are shared at far higher rates than factual new items: About 126,000 rumors were spread by ∼3 million people. False news reached more people than the truth; the top 1% of false news cascades diffused to between 1000 and 100,000 people, whereas the truth rarely diffused to more than 1000 people. Falsehood also diffused faster than the truth. The degree of novelty and the emotional reactions of recipients may be responsible for the differences observed. And this paradigm of news “out there” ranging from the entirely fantastical to the well-researched and objectively true means that readers are either constantly suspicious about what they read or just more gullible about the intake of news given the paucity of time to research every media byte. For instance, last fall when the cryptocurrency market began to rise ever so speedily, many people wrote me to ask me about bitcoin and if the stories were true about its reputed rise. The quality of fake news is so wide-ranging today in subject matter and analysis that it is hard for people to recognize the difference between actual true news, fake news, and as I found out yesterday when posting a satirical piece about a man who abandoned his family to live out his dream of living life as a squirrel. Indeed, at times it is difficult to recognize fake news from real news simply because reality is also troublingly “unreal” and indistinguishable from fable. So yesterday, I came upon a story which I shared on Facebook where my stream there is largely a bookmarking of stories I hope to read in the not-too-distant future. The story I posted is entitled “Big Pharma Co. Has License Suspended As Vaccine Sterilizes 500,000 Girls” and immediately upon posting the thread was flooded with skeptical comments asking if this is true, one wondering why the British media hadn’t reported this, and even one posting to a fact-checking website which rates news stories on the conspiracy range from “none” to “tin foil hat.” This article received a “mixed” review. And on Snopes, this related to a story from 2014 which was labelled as “false” despite the origins of the story being factually correct: a press statement released on 7 October, 2015 by the Catholic Health Commission of Kenya – Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops (KCCB) who state their concerns that the Tetanus Toxoid vaccine (TT) might be laced with Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG). This press release expressed concern for the role played by sponsoring development partners since such programs had “previously been used by the same partners in Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to vaccinate women against future pregnancy.” A component of experimental birth control vaccines, b-HCG caused alarm to these bishops as it is common knowledge that development aid has historically and negatively affected the bodies of women—especially those of women of color. Anyone who has lived in countries outside the west becomes acutely aware as to how “humanitarian aid” is peddled, offered up as the panacea to all social and medical ills, when, in fact, such aid usually debilitates local economies, medical practices, and educational institutions. And view the video of the man at the center of this debate, former Kenyan Prime Minister, Raila Odinga (1992-2013), who has spoken at length on his concerns. Watching this video, it is clear that Odinga is no biologist and that his statement does not account for presence of b-HCG. Similarly, the Washington Post report on this subject makes clear that the results are inconclusive either way due to how the sample of this vaccine was analyzed. Still many remain cautious about dismissing the accusations, such as Keith Donovan of Georgetown’s Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, stating: [T]here are aspects of this that need to be raising red flags because of history and because of the way it was all being done. But raising red flags doesn’t mean that there’s something that actually has occurred. What Donovan is getting at here is the importance of understanding how women’s bodies have been historically controlled by colonizing forces, especially with regards to their reproductive capacity. The accusations which target this long-running vaccination program sponsored by the WHO and UNICEF, inoculates women of reproductive age against tetanus in a country where tetanus is a deadly health problem. Yet the phrase “women of reproductive age” mentioned in the same sentence as any UN organization or NGO will set off alarms for many who have seen the horrors of mass sterilization programs which, oddly enough, British media has rarely covered. One of the most infamous mass sterilization projects in recent history was that carried out by the Peace Corps in Bolivia in the 1960s and early 1970s. This resulted in the Peace Corps being thrown out of the country in 1971, in large part because of the production of one of Bolivia’s most important films on the topic, Blood of the Condor (Yawar Mallku), by Jorge Sanjínes (1969), which informed the people as to what this US agency was doing to women. This project involved Peace Corps volunteers distributing contraception, even inserting IUDs into indigenous Quechua women, without their informed consent. This set off a series of accusations which in turn fueled rumors about widespread US-funded sterilization programs. Through the 1980s there was a distrust of all US programs, food products, and birth control products. Meanwhile in this same period, between 1965 and 1971, an estimated 1 million women in Brazil had been sterilized. And in Mexico in 1974 there was a massive sterilization program which gave an anti-fertility vaccine to 1,204 females under the guise of “family planning.” In Colombia, between 1963 and 1965 more than 400,000 women were sterilized in a program funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. And in the Philippines, where similar concerns of the tetanus vaccine was blamed for sterilizing women just last year, USAID has sponsored family planning programs there to the tune of $40m, with poor women being offered money to go through the sterilization procedure in rural villages. The Philippines has a long history of sterilization projects dating back to the 1970s which has resulted in a healthy skepticism about any “vaccines” that Filipina women will logically view with great suspicion. In recent years, there have been numerous reports from the Gauteng province of South Africa of women who are HIV+ people told that sterilization is the “best form of contraception” and others who have been sterilized without any consent whatsoever. Similar reports have been emerging from Uganda, Namibia, and Slovakia as well. In Israel, the government has been sterilizing Ethiopian immigrants to the country with a notable decline in their birthrate in the country. And both Kenya and Chile have various important court cases which specifically address the illegality of forced sterilization in well-documented cases. It is no surprise that the former Prime Minister of Kenya is suspicious of a vaccine that has been called into question by the Catholic Health Commission of Kenya. Still, let us not forget where such eugenicist notions of sterilization originated. From the early twentieth century, the eugenics movement in the UK was born which led to the formation of the Eugenics Education Society in 1907. This organization campaigned for the forced sterilization of mentally disabled women, a program supported by mostly Labour MPs such that by 1931 there was a draft bill proposed in Parliament to this end. On the other side of the Atlantic, sterilization laws were enacted in 32 of the US states between 1907 and 1937 only to be repealed from the 1970s onward. Although the sterilization was to affect the bodies of both males and females in the United States, the focus of sterilization would come to bear its weight on the bodies of women. For instance, in California, even when the state’s eugenic sterilization law was repealed in 1979, other legislation paved the way for operations in state prisons to sterilize female inmates. Between 2006 and 2010, there were 146 female inmates in two of California’s women’s prisons who received tubal ligations with at least three dozen of these procedures directly violating the state’s own informed consent process. Not surprisingly, the majority of those who were sterilized were not only first-time offenders, but largely African-American and Latina. The logic as explained by the physician responsible for these surgeries, Dr. James Heinrich: that the state would save money “compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children—as they procreated more.” In 2013, a journalist at the Center for Investigative Reporting published on this story which eventually led to the passage of a bill banning sterilization in California state prisons. And sterilization campaigns have been more than common outside of prisons in the United States and its territories such as the case of Puerto Rico where from the 1930s to late 1960s mass sterilization was underway such that by 1965, a survey revealed that one-third of Puerto Rican women were sterile. Similar to the surgeries undertaken in prisons was the rationale rooted in the desire to save the government’s money from women who were perceived as reproducing at high rates, especially when Puerto Rican immigrants were coming to the US in the 1970s. Also, there was the fear that Latinos might edge out “white America” which is why so many Latina women in Puerto Rico, New York City, and California were specifically targeted by the government for sterilization throughout the 20th century. African American women have also been the targets of population control throughout the country’s history and have been disproportionately affected by sterilization abuse. In North Carolina, the state which has one of the worse records for sterilization abuse, 65 percent of its sterilization procedures were performed on black women despite the population of black women in that state hovering at 25 percent. The case Madrigal v. Quilligan (1978) was ground-breaking in that, even if the judge ruled in favor of the doctors who abusively coerced Latina women into sterilization, this case set the precedent of informed consent, underscoring the obligation to provide forms in multiple languages for non-native English speakers. So while some are outraged by the claims of UNICEF and the WHO being accused of sterilizing women in countries like Kenya and the Philippines, others view the historical veracity of what similar agencies have done historically and more recently (eg. USAID’s support of Peru’s sterilization of indigenous women from 1997 through 2002 where “USAID provided $18 million to CARE for training doctors to perform sterilization and supplying sterilization equipment used in the coercive campaigns.”1 What is important to take away from these reports is that the suspicion exercised over the control of women’s bodies by foreign agencies and/or by these agencies exercising their monetary power through local politics needs to be regarded with great scrutiny. Has the Kenya Accreditation Service (Kenas) truly suspended Agriq-Quest Ltd’s license as a testing laboratory? I called their corporate number this morning and received no answer and went onto their Facebook page only to find it removed. I went onto the Kenas’ website to see that Agriq-Quest Ltd is delisted. The whole story has not been told and we have only a few blips of information here and there that can easily seem like fake news, or a story that western media doesn’t really care to tell. The larger question is why more western media isn’t concerned about the medicalization of the bodies of teenage girls and young women to the extent that the WHO and the UN are given carte blanche to create policy and to avoid answering any and all questions put to them about these policies. What consoles me about seeing Odinga’s statement to the press is not that the reports about sterilization are necessarily inaccurate, but they reveal a healthy dose of cynicism towards foreign agencies that have never had these peoples’ best interest at heart. We need to applaud the reports that may be inaccurate since they at least stick their neck out for the lives and rights of women to have a say in their corporeal autonomy, reproductive health, and lives. * Peru’s Ministry of Health, “Final Report Concerning Voluntary Surgical Contraception Activities,” July, 2002. http://clubof.info/

0 notes

tortuga-aak · 7 years

Text

Trump could be forced to testify on sexual-harassment allegations — and if he lies he could be impeached

Summer Zervos, who accused Trump of sexually harassing her in 2007, is suing him for defamation because he called her and other accusers liars.

Trump's lawyers will argue in a New York court on Tuesday that the lawsuit should be thrown out because he is a sitting president.

But former President Bill Clinton was deposed while he was a sitting president over allegations of sexual harassment by Paula Jones. Later, when he was found to have lied under oath, he was impeached by the House of Representatives.

"People are going to find out who this guy really is," Mindy McGillivray, one of Trump's accusers, told Business Insider.

President Trump could be forced to testify on allegations that he sexually harassed more than a dozen women as part of a defamation lawsuit filed by one of his accusers, if his lawyers fail to get the case dismissed.

Trump's legal team is arguing for a dismissal on Tuesday at a hearing in a New York state Supreme Court.

The suit was filed by Summer Zervos, a former contestant on "The Apprentice," who claimed last year that Trump "very aggressively" kissed her, groped her breasts, and began "thrusting" his genitals at her in a 2007 meeting at The Beverly Hills Hotel. Her claim is that Trump damaged her reputation when he called her a liar. The hearing comes amid a torrent of scrutiny around sexual misconduct by powerful men in the US following bombshell revelations regarding years of alleged sexual abuse by Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. The allegations cost Weinstein his job and, subsequently, women have come forward with a variety of allegations against high-profile journalists, lawmakers, and executives.

Trump's lawyers are expected to argue that the suit against him should be thrown out or delayed until after his term on the grounds that a sitting president can't be sued in state court. Part of their reasoning is that a trial could distract Trump from his official business as president. The experience of another US president — Bill Clinton — shows that this argument may not hold up. Clinton's experience also shows how, if Trump lies under oath, he could be impeached.

Clinton v. Jones

Susan Walsh/AP Images

"The precedent is not on Trump's side," says Susan Low Bloch, a professor at Georgetown University's law school and an expert in constitutional law.

The Supreme Court ruled in 1997, in Clinton v. Jones, that sitting presidents are not in fact immune from civil-law litigation over something that happened before they took office. The ruling specifically pertained to federal lawsuits. Trump's lawyers say this case is different because it was filed in a state court.

Trump's legal team is also expected to argue on Tuesday that the president's statements referring to his accusers as "liars" amounted to political speech and should therefore be protected from legal action.

"All of the statements occurred on political forums — a campaign website, on Mr. Trump’s Twitter account, in a presidential debate, and at campaign rallies — where the listeners expect to hear public debate, taken as political opinion rather than a defamatory statement," Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing last month.

This argument could be tough to win, unless Trump's defense can prove that Zervos is a limited public figure, Bloch said.

Zervos' lawyer, Gloria Allred, said Trump should have to defend what he said in court. Allred has also subpoenaed his campaign for all documents related to the many women who have accused him of sexual harassment.

"We believe that President Trump should be accountable for his statements," she said in July. "No one enjoys a license to defame based on power, wealth or privilege."

Zervos was one of 13 women who accused Trump last year of unwanted physical contact over a period spanning more than 30 years. Trump has denied Zervos' claims, saying he "vaguely" remembers her and that he never met her at a hotel. He later called Zervos and his other accusers "liars" during several campaign appearances and on Twitter. Zervos, through Allred, declined an interview. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Lying about Lewinsky

Screenshot/CSPAN

If the court decides the suit can move forward, Trump will likely be deposed, meaning he will have to give sworn statements concerning the allegations against him.

Former US President Bill Clinton faced a similar situation as a sitting president when he was sued by Paula Jones, who had accused him of sexual harassment when he was the governor of Arkansas. As part of that suit, Clinton gave a sworn deposition in 1998 in which he denied a sexual relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

Clinton later admitted to the affair, after Lewinsky provided grand-jury testimony on her relationship with the president and produced evidence: a dress stained with semen matching Clinton's DNA.

Kenneth Starr, an independent counsel at the time, concluded that Clinton committed perjury — an impeachable offense — when he denied the affair with Lewinsky. Starr submitted his findings to the US House of Representatives, which voted to impeach Clinton. But the Senate later acquitted him of all charges, and he remained in office.

Like Clinton, Trump could face impeachment if he lied under oath. In that case, it would ultimately be up to Congress to decide whether he was telling the truth.

Trump faces a litany of sexual-harassment allegations

More than a dozen women came forward before the presidential election last year accusing Trump of unwanted sexual advances.

Among them was Jessica Leeds, who said Trump groped her on a flight in the 1980s. She said he grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt. "He was like an octopus," she told The New York Times. "His hands were everywhere."

Kristin Anderson said Trump slipped his hand up her skirt and touched her vagina through her underwear at a New York City nightclub in the early 1990s. Jill Harth said Trump pushed her against a wall, put his hand up her skirt, and tried to kiss her at a dinner in the early 1990s. Mindy McGillivray said Trump grabbed her buttocks in 2003 when she was 23 years old and working at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's oceanfront resort in Palm Beach, Florida.

"Donald is over 6 feet tall and very intimidating," McGillivray told Business Insider. "I was vulnerable — a young mother."

Natasha Stoynoff said she was interviewing Trump in 2005, one year after his marriage to Melania, when he allegedly forced himself on her. "Within seconds he was pushing me against the wall and forcing his tongue down my throat," she wrote last year in People magazine.

Also in 2005, then 22-year-old Rachel Crooks said she introduced herself to Trump outside an elevator in Trump Tower in Manhattan and that he kissed her on the mouth.

These women and others all came forward following the release of an "Access Hollywood" videotape in which Trump bragged about being able to grab women "by the pussy." Trump later downplayed the remarks as "locker-room talk" and denied all the allegations of sexual harassment. The New York Times reported this week that Trump has since suggested to lawmakers that it is not him on the tape, citing people who are close to the president or aware of his private conversations.

'Totally phoney'

Tweet Embed: https://twitter.com/mims/statuses/787618207444131840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Polls close, but can you believe I lost large numbers of women voters based on made up events THAT NEVER HAPPENED. Media rigging election!Tweet Embed: https://twitter.com/mims/statuses/787244543003467776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw 100% fabricated and made-up charges, pushed strongly by the media and the Clinton Campaign, may poison the minds of the American Voter. FIX!Tweet Embed: https://twitter.com/mims/statuses/787990502415167488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Can't believe these totally phoney stories, 100% made up by women (many already proven false) and pushed big time by press, have impact!

Trump also threatened to sue all his accusers.

"Every woman lied when they came forward to hurt my campaign — total fabrication," Trump said at a campaign rally in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, in October 2016. "The events never happened. Never. All of these liars will be sued after the election is over."

Trump hasn't yet filed any suits against his accusers, but he still publicly maintains his innocence.

When asked about the Zervos subpoena in October, which demands all campaign communication regarding Trump's accusers, Trump called it "fake news."

"All I can say is it's totally fake news, just fake," he said. "It's fake. It's made-up stuff, and it's disgraceful what happens, but that happens in the world of politics."

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders later reaffirmed that the Trump administration’s official position is that all of Trump’s accusers are lying.

Trump accuser says the truth will come out

McGillivray, one of the women who said she was groped by Trump, says it's the president who is lying.

She told Business Insider that she was terrified to talk publicly about the incident in 2003 when she says Trump grabbed her buttocks.

"I was a nervous wreck," McGillivray said. "But I felt like this was a time to be courageous. The guy's a liar and I wanted people to know that."

McGillivray told her story to the Palm Beach Post in October, and said she subsequently became the target of a barrage of death threats online. She and her daughter fled their home in Florida for three weeks to escape the national attention.

Regardless of what happens with Zervos' suit, McGillivray said she's confident that Americans will ultimately find out the truth about the sexual-harassment allegations against Trump.

"People are going to find out who this guy really is," she said.

NOW WATCH: You can tell if someone is lying to you by watching for these facial tics

from Feedburner http://ift.tt/2AG5dHB

#Feedburner

0 notes

alanafsmith · 7 years

Text

Trump could be forced to testify on sexual-harassment allegations — and if he lies he could be impeached

Summer Zervos, who accused Trump of sexually harassing her in 2007, is suing him for defamation because he called her and other accusers liars.

Trump's lawyers will argue in a New York court on Tuesday that the lawsuit should be thrown out because he is a sitting president.

"People are going to find out who this guy really is," Mindy McGillivray, one of Trump's accusers, told Business Insider.

While everyone's talking about special counsel Robert Mueller and his investigation into the Trump campaign's communication with the Russian government, the president's lawyers are preparing for an altogether different case. On Tuesday, in a New York state Supreme Court hearing, they're expected to try to have a defamation case against the president dismissed. If they fail, the president could be forced to testify on allegations that he sexually harassed more than a dozen women. The suit was filed by Summer Zervos, a former contestant on "The Apprentice," who claimed last year that Trump "very aggressively" kissed her, groped her breasts, and began "thrusting" his genitals at her in a 2007 meeting at The Beverly Hills Hotel. Her claim is that Trump damaged her reputation when he called her a liar. The hearing comes amid a torrent of scrutiny around sexual misconduct by powerful men in the US following bombshell revelations regarding years of alleged sexual abuse by Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. The allegations cost Weinstein his job and, subsequently, women have come forward with a variety of allegations against high-profile journalists, lawmakers, and executives.

Clinton v. Jones

"The precedent is not on Trump's side," says Susan Low Bloch, a professor at Georgetown University's law school and an expert in constitutional law.

This argument could be tough to win, unless Trump's defense can prove that Zervos is a limited public figure, Bloch said.

"We believe that President Trump should be accountable for his statements," she said in July. "No one enjoys a license to defame based on power, wealth or privilege."

Lying about Lewinsky

If the court decides the suit can move forward, Trump will likely be deposed, meaning he will have to give sworn statements concerning the allegations against him.

Clinton later admitted to the affair, after Lewinsky provided grand-jury testimony on her relationship with the president and produced evidence: a dress stained with semen matching Clinton's DNA.

Like Clinton, Trump could face impeachment if he lied under oath. In that case, it would ultimately be up to Congress to decide whether he was telling the truth.

Trump faces a litany of sexual-harassment allegations

More than a dozen women came forward before the presidential election last year accusing Trump of unwanted sexual advances.

"Donald is over 6 feet tall and very intimidating," McGillivray told Business Insider. "I was vulnerable — a young mother."

Also in 2005, then 22-year-old Rachel Crooks said she introduced herself to Trump outside an elevator in Trump Tower in Manhattan and that he kissed her on the mouth.

'Totally phoney'

Polls close, but can you believe I lost large numbers of women voters based on made up events THAT NEVER HAPPENED. Media rigging election!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 16, 2016

100% fabricated and made-up charges, pushed strongly by the media and the Clinton Campaign, may poison the minds of the American Voter. FIX!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 15, 2016

Can't believe these totally phoney stories, 100% made up by women (many already proven false) and pushed big time by press, have impact!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 17, 2016

Trump also threatened to sue all his accusers.

Trump hasn't yet filed any suits against his accusers, but he still publicly maintains his innocence.

When asked about the Zervos subpoena in October, which demands all campaign communication regarding Trump's accusers, Trump called it "fake news."

"All I can say is it's totally fake news, just fake," he said. "It's fake. It's made-up stuff, and it's disgraceful what happens, but that happens in the world of politics."

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders later reaffirmed that the Trump administration’s official position is that all of Trump’s accusers are lying.

Trump accuser says the truth will come out

McGillivray, one of the women who said she was groped by Trump, says it's the president who is lying.

She told Business Insider that she was terrified to talk publicly about the incident in 2003 when she says Trump grabbed her buttocks.

"I was a nervous wreck," McGillivray said. "But I felt like this was a time to be courageous. The guy's a liar and I wanted people to know that."

Regardless of what happens with Zervos' suit, McGillivray said she's confident that Americans will ultimately find out the truth about the sexual-harassment allegations against Trump.

"People are going to find out who this guy really is," she said.

SEE ALSO: 22 powerful men in politics and media accused of sexual misconduct in the wake of Harvey Weinstein

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can tell if someone is lying to you by watching for these facial tics

from All About Law http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-could-be-forced-to-testify-on-sexual-harassment-allegations-2017-12

0 notes

usnewsaggregator-blog · 7 years

Text

The Brother-Sister Divide

New Post has been published on https://usnewsaggregator.com/the-brother-sister-divide/

The Brother-Sister Divide

MERCED, California—Nita Vue’s parents, refugees from Laos, wanted all nine of their children go to college. But Nita, now 20, is the only one of her brothers and sisters who is going to get a degree. A few of her sisters began college, and one nearly completed nursing school, she told me. Her brothers were less interested. “The way I grew up, the girls were more into schooling,” she said. “Women tended to have higher expectations than men did.”

This is not unusual. Across socioeconomic classes, women are increasingly enrolling and completing postsecondary education, while, even as opportunities for people without a college education shrink, men’s rates of graduation remain relatively stagnant. In 2015, the most recent year for which data is available, 72.5 percent of females who had recently graduated high school were enrolled in a two-year or four-year college, compared to 65.8 percent of men. That’s a big difference from 1967, when 57 percent of recent male high-school grads were in college, compared to 47.2 percent of women.

Women from low-income and minority families especially have made great strides in recent decades. Just 12.4 percent of men from low-income families who were high-school sophomores in 2002 had received a bachelor’s degree by 2013, compared to 17.6 percent of women. And in 2016, 22 percent of Hispanic women ages 25 to 29 had a bachelor’s degree, compared to 16 percent of Hispanic men.

(While poor women are outpacing poor men, it is important to note that in the big picture, poor women are nevertheless far behind their richer counterparts. About 70 percent of women from a high socioeconomic status who were high school sophomores in 2002 had gotten bachelor’s degrees by 2013, compared to 17.6 percent of women from low socioeconomic status.)

This gender gap in college completion has been a long time in the making. In the early 1900s, when some elite colleges started opening up to women, women quickly got better grades than men, according to Claudia Buchmann, a professor of sociology at Ohio State and the co-author of The Rise of Women: The Growing Gender Gap in Education and What it Means for American Schools. In the 1970s, as more women started attending college, they started graduating at higher and higher rates, while men’s enrollment and graduation rates remained relatively flat. But until recently, the women attending college were mostly from elite families. Now, women from lower-income families are increasingly attending college.

Percentage of American 25-to-29-Year-Olds With a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher

Steven Johnson / The Atlantic

This is a positive development for women, because a college education is increasingly important in today’s economy. Out of the 11.6 million jobs created after the recession, 8.4 million of those went to those with at least a bachelor’s degree, according to the Center on Education and the Workforce at Georgetown. But while women across socioeconomic classes are embracing the idea that education is important and are pursuing postsecondary degrees, many men from lower-income households are not. “The puzzle is—why don’t boys get it? There’s all this talk that we hear constantly, about the benefits of a college degree,” said Buchmann.

Some of the problem is that boys from low-income families appear to struggle more in school than girls do. They lag behind as early as kindergarten even though health tests show that, at the time of birth, they are just as healthy and cognitively able to learn as their sisters, a recent paper found. This is partly because they appear to be more affected by poverty and stress than girls are. “Boys are differentially sensitive to negative environments in general,” one of the paper’s authors, Northwestern professor David Figlio, told me. These findings dovetail with much-cited research out of the Equality of Opportunity Project that finds that childhood disadvantage is especially harmful for boys.

School quality is also more important for boys than for girls, Figlio said, and since many low-income families attend poor-quality schools, their sons, who are already lagging behind their daughters, fall even further behind. The paper found that lower-income boys often do worse in elementary and middle school than their sisters, and have more behavioral problems, which can lead them to disengage with school entirely or get kicked out.

Nita Vue told me she was always set on college, even when she was in grade school. Neither of her parents has a college education, and neither has worked recently, but they encouraged all of their children to focus on school. Nita, who is now a junior at the University of California-Merced, would come home from school and read while her siblings were listening to music. She always had good grades, and graduated from high school with a 4.0 grade point average. In general, her sisters did better academically than her brothers did, her mother, Mai Kao Vue, told me. “The girls were more into schooling, and the boys were more outgoing,” she said.

What is it about girls? The differences start young: Girls enter kindergarten more prepared than boys, and derive more satisfaction from pleasing parents and teachers than boys do, according to Buchmann. In one study, 62 percent of eighth-grade girls said that good grades were “very important,” compared to 50 percent of boys, according to Buchmann and her co-author Thomas DiPrete. Girls also have more of the social and behavioral skills that are important for succeeding in school from an early age, Buchmann said.

Boys often feel pressured to act “masculine,” which can lead them to eschew school —one study showed that boys put a lot of effort into school are often labeled as “gay” or “pussies.” Yet boys who don’t buy into those stereotypes and participate in music, dance, or art, do better than other boys academically in eighth grade, according to Buchmann and DiPrete. Those different levels of engagement can make a difference for college attendance: students who reported getting mostly As in middle school have a 70 percent chance of completing college by age 25, while those who get mostly Cs have only a 10 percent chance.

How parents raise children can exacerbate these dynamics. Pressures to be “masculine” are often stronger in lower-income or working-class families, Buchmann says. “The notion of what it means to be a boy and a man, especially among lower working-class boys, makes it such that they see doing well in school as something that girls and women do, and they don’t want any part of it,” Buchmann told me. This is especially true if boys see male role models like fathers or older family members working physical, blue-collar jobs that don’t require an education. They may assume that they’ll be able to work those jobs too, even if they’re disappearing, and think that doing anything else is too “girly.” By contrast, if boys have role models that are educated, they do better in school. Better-educated parents often teach their children a different concept of masculinity in which academic achievement is important. Moreover, they are more likely to know men in careers that require an education, and to have those men as their role models.

Percentage of Black and Hispanic American 25-to-29-Year-Olds With a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher, by Gender

Steven Johnson / The Atlantic

Nita’s brother, Por Vue, who is now 28, told me he thought he was deeply affected by his family’s lack of knowledge about the educational system. He actually applied to and was accepted into Cal State Monterey Bay, but his parents advised him to instead go to a junior college closer to home, he told me. But the junior college was overcrowded and he couldn’t get into many of the classes he wanted, so had to change his major. Then, while he was in college, he started a family, and later dropped out so he could support his wife and kids. He’s now a manager at PetSmart, where he makes around $13 an hour. “I think if I’d had a better family background, I would have had knowledge that other people had, and I would have been able to go further,” he told me.

Boys may also be more susceptible to short-term instant gratification than girls are, Buchmann told me. Boys may have a harder time slogging away at a college degree and paying for it when they know there are jobs available where they could get paid a decent wage, even if that job might not be a long-term proposition. I talked to a 31-year-old in Merced named Edward Vasquez who was one-and-a-half years into a two-year nursing program when he dropped out to take a job as a certified nursing assistant that paid $17.50 an hour. He’s since lost his job and is looking for work.

This is not to say that men can’t succeed if they don’t have a college education. I talked to a woman named Olga Jimenez who was raised by a single mother, and who went to college when her brothers didn’t. But her brother has still made a good career as a real-estate agent, and has a license and his own office, she told me. Meanwhile, Olga had to work three jobs at once while she attended Whittier College and is still paying off her college debt.

Yet Jimenez’s brother is the exception, not the rule. People with just a high-school diploma make, on average, $692 a week, compared to $1,156 for those with a bachelor’s degree. And the returns of a college education have grown over time. People with a bachelor’s degree or higher earn 14 percent more than they did in 1979, on average, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics; people with a high school degree earn 12 percent less.

As the gender gap grows, there are wider implications for society. People are more likely to pair with others who have a similar educational background; as more women get postsecondary degrees than men, women will increasingly find their marriage prospects dimming. This is already happening in some areas of the country—I wrote in May about a town in Ohio where the women complained that all the men were on drugs or unemployed, while the women held down steady jobs. Their daughters will face a similar future, unless they can get their sons to succeed at—and care about—school.

Original Article:

Click here

0 notes

tortuga-aak · 7 years

Text

Trump could be forced to testify on sexual-harassment allegations — and if he lies he could be impeached

Summer Zervos, who accused Trump of sexually harassing her in 2007, is suing him for defamation because he called her and other accusers liars.

Trump's lawyers will argue in a New York court on Tuesday that the lawsuit should be thrown out because he is a sitting president.

"People are going to find out who this guy really is," Mindy McGillivray, one of Trump's accusers, told Business Insider.

Clinton v. Jones

Susan Walsh/AP Images

"The precedent is not on Trump's side," says Susan Low Bloch, a professor at Georgetown University's law school and an expert in constitutional law.

This argument could be tough to win, unless Trump's defense can prove that Zervos is a limited public figure, Bloch said.

"We believe that President Trump should be accountable for his statements," she said in July. "No one enjoys a license to defame based on power, wealth or privilege."

Lying about Lewinsky

Screenshot/CSPAN

If the court decides the suit can move forward, Trump will likely be deposed, meaning he will have to give sworn statements concerning the allegations against him.

Clinton later admitted to the affair, after Lewinsky provided grand-jury testimony on her relationship with the president and produced evidence: a dress stained with semen matching Clinton's DNA.

Like Clinton, Trump could face impeachment if he lied under oath. In that case, it would ultimately be up to Congress to decide whether he was telling the truth.

Trump faces a litany of sexual-harassment allegations

More than a dozen women came forward before the presidential election last year accusing Trump of unwanted sexual advances.

"Donald is over 6 feet tall and very intimidating," McGillivray told Business Insider. "I was vulnerable — a young mother."

Also in 2005, then 22-year-old Rachel Crooks said she introduced herself to Trump outside an elevator in Trump Tower in Manhattan and that he kissed her on the mouth.

'Totally phoney'

Trump also threatened to sue all his accusers.

Trump hasn't yet filed any suits against his accusers, but he still publicly maintains his innocence.

When asked about the Zervos subpoena in October, which demands all campaign communication regarding Trump's accusers, Trump called it "fake news."

"All I can say is it's totally fake news, just fake," he said. "It's fake. It's made-up stuff, and it's disgraceful what happens, but that happens in the world of politics."

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders later reaffirmed that the Trump administration’s official position is that all of Trump’s accusers are lying.

Trump accuser says the truth will come out

McGillivray, one of the women who said she was groped by Trump, says it's the president who is lying.

She told Business Insider that she was terrified to talk publicly about the incident in 2003 when she says Trump grabbed her buttocks.

"I was a nervous wreck," McGillivray said. "But I felt like this was a time to be courageous. The guy's a liar and I wanted people to know that."

Regardless of what happens with Zervos' suit, McGillivray said she's confident that Americans will ultimately find out the truth about the sexual-harassment allegations against Trump.

"People are going to find out who this guy really is," she said.

NOW WATCH: You can tell if someone is lying to you by watching for these facial tics

from Feedburner http://ift.tt/2AG5dHB

#Feedburner

0 notes