Tumgik
#i also thought 'oh i wanna date and id date ppl of any gender. so bi' but i think now id actually prefer being in a qpr not dating
golisopod-mutual · 3 years
Text
I took a (short) break away from labels bc I was driving myself nuts trying to identify and categorize my every feeling into neat little check boxes. So I stepped away and just gave myself some room to breathe, ig.
Anyway I'm identifying as just aroace now, not oriented/bi aroace.
#its kinda tough bc my bi label has been very comforting to me but its not accurate to my experiences anymore#so its time to move on. it was helpful while i needed it and thats what matters!#it was good i stepped away. gave me some perspective#i remembered a) aroace means little to no attraction. not exactly 0. so i dont have to change labels if#i do happen to have some attraction. and i dont have to agonize over 'oh was that middle school crush legit? does that mean im not aro?'#and i realized i dont experience aesthetic attraction like i thought I did#i misunderstood what it was/what it felt like and to my knowledge ive only experienced it once.#tbh i think i knew that but i didnt wanna let go of my bi label bc i found so much comfort in it#so i denied it. i held on to oriented as my label bc it let me keep using bi#regardless of accuracy#but im ready to be honest now. i don't experience aesthetic attraction significantly enough to add to my label#i also thought 'oh i wanna date and id date ppl of any gender. so bi' but i think now id actually prefer being in a qpr not dating#so. yeah. aroace who eventually would like a qpr#now that im thinkin abt it tho maybe ive experienced alterous attraction?#but just like aesthetic attraction ive only experienced it once. MAYBE twice.#so it doesn't seem significant enough to add alongside my aroace label#ig it comes down to bi/oriented is still technically applicable#but i prefer just aroace bc its broader/the attraction i do feel is not very significant or common#like. oriented is technically applicable to me. but ive felt aesthetic/alterous attraction 3 times at most??#it doesn't seem like a big enough part of my aroace experience to label. im not gonna center my identity around smthg#that has happened 3 times in 22 years lol. those instances are just bizarre outliers
10 notes · View notes
hometownrockstar · 2 years
Text
sorry if this looks like im over-valuing internet strangers' thoughts and opinions on my personal identity to the viewers but, does anyone think its "weird" the way i talk abt nonbinary characters/hcs, or gender/pronouns esp my own, or like dorothea lol. Like lemme explain. im a fully binary gay trans man (right now. ive never questioned or doubted it before but that doesnt mean im not gonna deny myself if my feelings ever change, and i dont question anything currently) but i sometimes wonder if people doubt my own word abt my identity just bc i use different pronouns including neos and no/it pronouns, or based on the way i talk abt nb characters i like and identify/relate to a lot.
cause i try to be sensitive abt the way i talk abt nonbinary identities and characters cause i obviously dont wanna overstep boundaries but i just think abt them a lot bc i like and relate to them (nb characters/hcs and ocs) a lot and ive just always questioned and got bored/annoyed by the inherent cisnormativity in everything ever (like thinking "why would these aliens have genders and be straight?" as a kid while watching sci-fi or whatnot) like just hating the inherent erasure of trans people made me constantly think abt nonbinariness in characters, and also i just knew and liked a lot of nb characters as a kid and they helped me on my own gender discovery. ...And me saying this is giving me that feeling i talked abt at the start, where i worry ppl are thinking "lol this guy is in denial and is def nb bc he said he relates to nb experiences" cause i honestly dont id as nonbinary! if that changes in the future thats great but how i id now is important too!
and then abt sexuality... ive thought abt it a lot, and have come to the conclusion i dont have much experience in romance or anything so whatever happens or changes in the future will be most important, but for the time being the only woman i have ever contemplated dating was a fictional woman from a video game, and i dont picture myself with a woman irl or feel much when i imagine it, therefore i am satisfied calling myself gay now. but THEN ppl try and go "oh well u could be bi-gay!" ...-___- can we talk abt how invasive that is too? like thats literally saying "oh you could want to date men and women, but only want to fuck men! (or vice-versa)" like maybe that info isnt any of your business?
9 notes · View notes