IT BEGINS MUHAHAHAHAHA
I've been a "No ships for Alastor" person for the longest time bc I couldn't see him with anyone, but then episode 5 happened and Radioapple has taken over my life. I'm also not a big fan of making fankids/nextgens for my ships bc I don't like the idea that every couple needs a child (plus most of the ships that I like I just can't see dealing with kids)... Howeverrrrr the entirety of this ship is these two goobers trying to out-dad each other, so I just,,, created a child concept... for fun...
Yeah it didn't remain just "for fun" for long lmao, say hi to Cider.
Premise: Lucifer and Alastor both made their own little versions of each other, so they can take their anger out on them, Charlie finds out, the above interaction happens, BOOM! Congratulations you goobers you now have a child.
Charlie is absolutely extatic about her new little brother, Lucifer is shocked at first but comes around quickly, Alastor... Alastor takes a while to warm up to the idea, but Cider's cuteness slowly wins him over. He 100% tries to hide it tho.
I
AM
GOING
FERAL
Over these two, my god, I can't y'all, this show has me in a chokehold but these two goobers expecially.
Hazbin Hotel by to Vivziepop
art and character by me, do not copy, trace, repost, reuse ecc without my permission please.
1K notes
·
View notes
Anon, please don't send me other people's posts like this. I wouldn't like someone grabbing my posts from my space and bringing them over to someone else's space without giving me the chance to debate as needed, so I don't want to do this to other people 😔
If you just want my opinion on Akane's line, Akane takes Kana's acting detours personally because she loves her as an actress. She feels that instead of doing what she wants and acting the way she wants, Kana has been catering to other people. And she is right. The only thing she doesn't know is that Kana has kept practicing, but Akane is thrilled to find out that Kana still has it in her because she is actress!Kana's biggest fan lol
I don't think the staff is indifferent to Akane. I distinctly remember one of them was thrilled when Akane topped the weekly female character popularity list, and some Japanese Kana fans replied to them to complain about them showing favoritism 😂 So basically, just ignore them! Block if you need to!
Back to the anime though, I personally do find it kind of disappointing that Akane has gotten so little merch and that every other drawing is Kana. The anime staff aren't the only ones who do this though, even Mengo just drew Kana for Natsucomi lol So it really feels like they all jus treated this as the Kana season. Whether this was done deliberately or simply to stay true to the source material which does highlight Kana during this portion of the story, we'll have to wait until S2 to find out. If Akane gets the same treatment, then they were just staying true to the source material. If they somehow find a way to keep highlighting Kana despite her limited focus during the two upcoming arcs, then we will know for sure and we'll also know what to expect in the manga lol
That said, guys, I'm sorry 😭 I keep getting Kana & Aq/Kan related asks so I'll start skipping them unless they're about something I personally want to comment on. If you just want to vent, I get you and you're more than welcome to vent away in my inbox! But I hope you don't mind that I don't reply to it. I just want my blog to go back to Akane and AquaKane, the way it's supposed to be lol
12 notes
·
View notes
dear miss himekaidou,
i unfortunately have not been employed. so, i’ve been working on a few journalist articles, mostly as practice for my skills in case i ever decide to go into the practice and im worried that the articles i’ve been making aren’t of high quality.
how do you manage? i know such insecurities might be common in a profession such as yours, so…. any advice?
yours, eientei’s favorite kon-consultant
"Trust me, to start off- a great journalist is one that already is thinking about the quality of their work and doesn't shut their brain off for ideas. So I think you're off to a good start! It's hard, because while it's a job- you aren't gonna like, be able to push for the great caste system revolution- I mean hard-hitting journalism all of the time. Sometimes you're gonna get stuck with 'Pick your favourite wagashi and we'll tell you your personality!'"
"Buuut, I think there's something to learn from each article you write- even if you scrap them, you need only look. For example, I- loathe as I am to say it- did do such pitiful writing as that article- but the person that requested it also offered a coupon for a senbei stand… 'Dorayaki lovers are hot headed and there's more to them that meets the eye- but they can get caught up in their own world, so they should try some senbei!' 'Senbei lovers go with the flow, but don't pursue their own wants, so they should buy some more senbei!' I'm kinda curious, if I ran that article a week later, would I get a different result? There's a buncha conclusions and thoughts you could ask about the journalism even in such a 'low-quality' article."
"I've been talking with that outside world human, and everything down to 'memes' and 'tagging systems' can show different sides of a story and the intentions of an article. Liiiike, there was this one time this crazy village man, Yoshimoto- he started raving about 'how there was some chemical the yamawaro were putting to turn the frogs into youkai'- and some newbie that wanted a week off just handed him a typewriter for him to start his rantings. But then when I actually used my thoughtography to check that river…well, he wasn't wrong? Sorta. The frogs were having extra legs- but when I wanted to write about it, up top said 'It's already been covered'. But it hadn't been. Not properly."
"So how could I word it? I mean, 'Yamawaro machinery production found to have linkage in extra limbage of amphibian population'- bo~ring! What about '3 ramblings of Yoshimoto- Number 3 is suprisingly true!' and I slap a couple memes on it? Would that draw eyes? Is Yoshimoto actually concerned, or was this coverage intentionally from a crazy old geezer to discredit a potential problem?"
"These are like, the hard stuff that comes with our industry- especially if you don't get the freedom to go independent. But I know that by asking, you're off to a great start. You have to be asking questions, every time- how can I see this differently? How can I write this differently? How are -other- people writing stuff differently? What's language that's 'hip', what language is alienating? Seriously, can Aya stop using red circles and arrows in her articles like [Mii]Tube thumbnails?!"
"Not everything is gonna be a magnum opus, and not every wagashi listicle is gonna be the lynchpin into your socialist uprising theory deprogramming toolkit- and that's okay. As long as you put questioning and engagement- actual encouragement of media literacy- at the forefront of your own work and viewership, I think that's more work than a lot of other grifter sheeple are doing. There's more than meets a camera's eye, and as long as you keep collecting, I know you'll become someone that will paint a better landscape for Gensokyou- so get your brush, and crow all you want, mmkay?"
5 notes
·
View notes
Also...reading this line again, I do wonder if the purpose of bringing up Shawn here was actually meant as a way for her to distinguish what fans are saying from what gets published in media like the NYT. Like, she's acknowledging that artists like Shawn do generate a LOT of sexuality speculation from their fans, but NYT isn't publishing articles (even "opinion pieces") on what those fans are saying. Only her and her fans.
Honestly, at this point I think Taylor knows that nothing she can do is going to stop certain fans from speculating on whether she's queer, and she (and by extension, we as a fanbase) do not have to like that, but at a certain point...we should also acknowledge that a lot of those fans are young queers trying to find their place and relate to their favorite artist and maybe not doing that in the best way, yes, but...it is what it is. However, there's a major difference between fans tweeting amongst themselves speculation on twitter.com, and a publication like the NYT both giving it a wider platform and adding legitimacy to it by putting their name atop an article that states, "Taylor Swift is gay" (yes, even if it's an opinion article.)
I still think bringing up gender was a stupid and aimless notion here, but in a way I also think this line was meant to try to protect her fans while still making it clear that articles like the NYT's one are very much invasive, harmful & not okay with her.
4 notes
·
View notes