#if you want the URLs i censored to block them just shoot me an ask

[fltwoodsmonster]

hey hold on a sec

I just realized both op and the commenter are insane trad christains so im deleting my reblog (because im not platforming their shit -- this is ALSO why im censoring their URLs I’m not going to give them traffic) and instead reposing it with the following links/information:

1) The WHO still actively hosts a guide on how to create safe milk substitutes when access to breastmilk/milk substitutes are unavailable on the Institutional Repository for Information Sharing (iris). The guide is called “Infant Feeding in Emergencies: A Guide for Mothers”. Relevant information starts on page 38.

2) Here is a link to the archived guide WITH THE CAUTION that I was not able to find out why its no longer provided by the WHO or iris. It could be that the information is out of date. I am only sharing it because I think the visuals may be helpful for people who have trouble reading written directions. Consult the above link first, then refer to this guide only if you need clarification on how to perform certain actions. Link to archive.

3) The language in that second comment throws up so may red flags. I cropped it to only the information needed to understand the context of this post because I find it immensely suspect. The repeated allusions to 2020 for no apparent reason (but I can guess why, as an infection disease scientist) come across as loaded or dog-whistely. I would advise against sharing the OP for that reason. But because the information being provided is important and not well known, I’m making this alternative post for people to reblog. 

4) The implication that the WHO is censoring information based on a 404 page is a really flimsy and extreme conclusion to jump to. The “Infant Feeding in Emergencies” guide I linked above also goes to a 404 page on the WHO’s main website - but again, can be accessed through iris instead. So no, the information on how to feed infants in a food crisis is not being censored by the WHO.

5) A more likely cause for the guide disappearing is that the link broke and they didn’t fix it. If you look at the original URL it indicates the guide was posted in a subcategory on the WHO’s website about International Crises, specifically in the Middle East. If you try to type in a shortened versions of that URL (specifically https://www.who.int/hac/crises/ or the slightly modified http://www.who.int/hac/crises/en/) you’ll see that the subdomain that was present with relevant info breaks around 2020. In fact, while testing this hypothesis, I came across this information page in a November 2021 version of the URL https://www.who.int/home/cms-decommissioning (which I was redirected to automatically from http://www.who.int/hac/crises/en/):

There is no nefarious conspiracy theory. The link simply broke - as many many many many links do on the internet. The second commenters reply is proven bunk by a little bit of fact checking.

sorry for the long post, but I think the information on infant nutrition substitutes is genuinely useful, lifesaving info -- but i’m not going to give more people with dangerous ideological views spouting nonsense a platform.

update (5/20/22):

I had hope this was a given, but I want to be explicitly clear.

Using an at-home formula substitute should be a last resort. Contact your infant’s physician or a pediatrician before attempting to make your own milk substitute.

I am also going to leave a link to the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine’s statement on breast milk substitute shortages.

Do not blindly follow internet posts in regards to the health of yourself or your children. I wanted to share this post simply because I, myself, did not even know it was possible to make milk substitutes and thought it was useful to be aware of in an time when access to substitutes is unprecedentedly difficult.

[vernicle]

Portland's mayor took a stand against hate, but the ACLU is pushing back. Here's why.

[ad_1]

You won't be able to defeat despise with censorship, but that doesn't mean it has to acquire.

On May possibly 26, 35-calendar year-old Jeremy Joseph Christian allegedly stabbed a few men on board a Portland light-rail teach right after they attempted to intervene on behalf of a Muslim lady who Christian was verbally harassing.

Two of individuals men, Taliesin Myrddin Namkai-Meche and Ricky Best, died when a 3rd, Micah Fletcher, survived.

Photos of Taliesin Myrddin Namkai-Meche and Ricky Best in a memorial established up in Portland. Image by Alex Milan Tracy/AP Images.

Three days right after the incident, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler weighed in with an crucial message for his town.

In the message, posted to his Facebook site, Wheeler calls on the federal government to revoke the permit granted to an "alt-ideal" group hosting an party in Portland's Shrunk Plaza in June.

He also appeals to the organizers of the white supremacist group to cancel the planned demonstration. "There is never ever a position for bigotry or hatred in our group, and specially not now," Wheeler wrote.

"I am contacting on every single elected chief in Oregon, every single authorized agency, every single stage of regulation enforcement to stand with me in blocking one more tragedy."

Here's the full text of Wheeler's write-up:

"On Friday a few men Rick Best, Taliesin Myrddin Namkai-Meche, and Micah Fletcher stood up towards bigotry and hatred. Two paid out with their lives. A 3rd was very seriously injured.

Our group remains in shock and mourning. But we are also enormously grateful to our heroes and their family members for their selflessness and heroism. They will serve to inspire us to be the loving, courageous people today we are intended to be.

As Mayor, I required to update you on a couple developments:

1) I have attained out to all of the victims and their family members, which include the two women of all ages who have been terrorized and subjected to this sort of hatred and bigotry. I have offered my unconditional guidance and guidance, day or night.

2) I have confirmed that the Town of Portland has NOT and will not situation any permits for the alt ideal activities scheduled on June 4th or June 10th. The Federal government controls permitting for Shrunk Plaza, and it is my knowledge that they have issued a permit for the party on June 4th."

three) I am contacting on the federal government to Promptly REVOKE the permit(s) they have issued for the June 4th party and to not situation a permit for June 10th. Our Town is in mourning, our community’s anger is true, and the timing and matter of these activities can only exacerbate an already challenging predicament.

four) I am interesting to the organizers of the alt-ideal demonstrations to Terminate the activities they have scheduled on June 4th and June 10th. I urge them to request their supporters to continue to be away from Portland. There is never ever a position for bigotry or hatred in our group, and specially not now.

five) I am contacting on every single elected chief in Oregon, every single authorized agency, every single stage of regulation enforcement to stand with me in blocking one more tragedy.

six) When and if the time is ideal for them, I would like to function with the family members to come across an correct way to completely keep in mind their sacrifice and honor their braveness. Their heroism is now component of the legacy of this good town and I want long run generations to keep in mind what took place in this article, and why, so that it may possibly serve to equally eradicate hatred and inspire long run generations to stand up for the ideal values like Rick, Taliesin, and Micah did past 7 days."

The ACLU of Oregon, even so, doesn't agree with Wheeler, declaring that what he recommended is a form of censorship.

In a reaction on their have Facebook site, the firm explained (emphasis added):

"Our hearts are damaged, but government censorship is not the respond to. The government cannot revoke or deny a permit based on the viewpoint of the demonstrators. Interval.

It may perhaps be tempting to shut down speech we disagree with, but at the time we enable the government to choose what we can say, see, or listen to, or who we can assemble with, heritage demonstrates us that the most marginalized will be disproportionately censored and punished for unpopular speech.

We are all no cost to reject and protest suggestions we you should not agree with. That is a main, fundamental freedom of the United States. If we enable the government to shut down speech for some, we all will shell out the selling price down the line. We need to protect the Structure, even when it is unpleasant.

If the government has concrete proof of an imminent menace they can and should deal with it without the need of proscribing Initial Modification rights of other people."

The factor is ... equally Wheeler and the ACLU of Oregon are ideal in distinctive strategies.

So where does that leave us?

At his arraignment, Christian shouted, "Absolutely free speech or die. Get out if you you should not like no cost speech ... you simply call it terrorism, I simply call it patriotism ... die." Image by Beth Nakamura/The Oregonian/OregonLive.

Like a ton of matters in life, it's a little bit nuanced.

Right before you hop on #TeamTed or #TeamACLU, it's crucial to admit that fairly substantially everyone involved in this has very good intentions, is disgusted by Christian's actions, and doesn't want just about anything like it to come about ever all over again.

On just one hand, you can absolutely see where Wheeler is coming from. With tensions functioning high and the truth that Christian had just a short while ago attended a comparable rally, it helps make ideal perception that his impulse would be to shut down approaching rallies for worry of provoking or inspiring one more assault. With the town even now mourning this reduction, it's easy to understand that he'd look for strategies to de-escalate the predicament even so he can and send out a strong message towards despise and bigotry.

On the other, the ACLU is entirely ideal when it states the government won't be able to just revoke permits due to the fact of someone's political views. Responding to a comment on Facebook, the firm recommended that the mayor just take a additional calculated tactic that doesn't violate the Structure by speaking to the groups organizing to hold rallies and asking them to reschedule in light of the latest assault. The groups you should not have to, but without the need of outlining why these rallies pose an imminent menace, that is about all Wheeler can lawfully do.

Liberty of speech, even so, does not mean speech without the need of effects.

There are moments when regulation enforcement can and should intervene to stop speech from turning into action. For this, let us look at how the ACLU responded to the 2011 shooting exterior the business office of then-Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (emphasis added):

"It is crucial to keep in mind that when the Initial Modification thoroughly guards our liberty to converse freely other than in the most circumscribed situations, it is not a barrier to effective regulation enforcement towards individuals moderately considered to be involved in illegal action. ... In moments like these, it is organic to look for strategies to quell our horror and worry. But it is when people today feel most susceptible that our liberties are most at hazard. Unraveling the ideas that form the main of our democracy is not the respond to."

No make a difference what someone's individual politics are, no make a difference what group they belong to, it's crucial that they're afforded that critical ideal to freedom of speech. Even so, in heated moments with heated rhetoric, we — and regulation enforcement companies — have a duty to stop that speech from boiling more than into actual physical violence.

If the groups guiding individuals approaching "alt-ideal" demonstrations want to act in very good faith, then yeah, perhaps they should imagine about canceling their demonstration in light of latest activities. Up right up until Jeremy Christian pulled out a knife, he sounded just like them. To display that they do not condone his actions — and not hazard becoming observed as "moderately considered to be involved in illegal action" and held liable should one more assault come about — canceling may possibly be in their very best interest to maintain their freedom of speech.

Regardless of whether or not these demonstrations come about, it's on the relaxation of us to not allow an ideology of despise acquire out.

We can look to the brave men who misplaced their lives to this senseless violence as an inspiration to recommit to hunting out for just one one more and standing up towards despise. That may possibly just be the very best way to honor their reminiscences.

A memorial established up in Portland shares a message of adore and hope. Image by Alex Milan Tracy by way of AP Images.

[ad_2] Supply url

from Viral News Around The World - Feed http://ift.tt/2qHPsXI via IFTTT