#juan jose arevalo
Text
[16/08/2023, Plaza de la Constitución, Guatemala] A woman holding the portrait of Juan José Arévalo – the first democratically elected president of Guatemala, after a popular revolution in 1944 overthrew the dictatorship – notices beside her Bernardo Arévalo, Juan José Arévalo's son and the unlikely leading candidate for president of this Central American country.
After decades of corrupt politicians pocketing up to 40% of the State's budget, Bernardo Arévalo has gather enormous popular support with his low-cost, power-to-the-people, anti-corruption campaign. This Sunday (Aug. 20th) the Guatemalan people will choose between him and her unscrupulous, foul-mouthed, anti-lgbtq, formerly imprisoned for illegal campaign financing opponent, Sandra Torres.
#bernardo arevalo#juan jose arevalo#guatemala#guatemalan elections#democracy#corruption#anticorruption#elecciones de Guatemala#latin america#central america#politics
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
Por cierto..yo no me quiero quedar con la ESPINITA DE NO SER PADRE como JUAN José BAUTISTA alias JUAN Y MEDIO [al que me presento su hermano DAVID BAUTISTA en el after_hour BACKSTAGE donde era RRPP y que le compró un coche a mi amigo y vecino JOSE MANUEL ALMARCHA ALCOLEA en su concesionario BOSS de Auto_caravanas y FIAT_LANCIA_ALFAROMEO que les expropiaron por construcción de TERMINAL IV]..que tiene 5 hermanos ninguno se caso y la chica es la única que tuvo un hijo [pues ese es otro GRAN PODER que tienen que deciden cuando y con quien tener un hijo en el que caso que quieran]..y el cual tras presentármelo tuvo un grave accidente patinando y casi muere pero solo se quedó cojo..y estuvo viviendo en el CORTIJO de BERTIN OSBORNE al que fotografie en un SUPERMERCADO de BARCELONA [junto al teatro APOLO donde representaba en Mayo 2013 "DOS CARADURAS EN PARO" con el recién fallecido AREVALO] promocionando sus FIAMBRES SOLIDARIOS para la FUNDACION que creo para la PARALISIS CEREBRAL como la que tiene su hijo con su ex 2da mujer VENEZOLANA [no se si por el INTERES TE QUIERO ANDRES trae consecuencias de todo tipo en la descendencia o familiares ..o hacer el MAL O FUMAR]..OTRA COSA ES QUE EJERZA..creo que es más IMPORTANTE el papel de una BUENA MADRE ..pues por DINERO creo que no será PROBLEMA sobre todo si ella es una de AME_RICA jaja
Lo que si quiero EJERCER es de DUEÑO de un BORDER COLIE o el PERRO MAS INTELIGENTE incluso más que esta HUMANIDAD jaja ..necesitan mucho ejercicio y estimulación..como yo jaja
0 notes
Text
Say It As You See It
Documentary:The Art of Political Murder
On 26th April 1998, shortly after midnight, the phone starts to ring incessantly. Ronalth Ochaeta answers.
"They have killed him," the caller sighs...
Bishop Juan Gerardi, known as Guatemala's undaunted human rights activist, was assassinated two days after presenting the world with the REMHI - Recovery of Historical Memory Project in a report titled "Never Again - Guatemala", a vast undertaking outlining the mass murders committed during the Guatemalan Civil War (1960-1996) and condemning the state military's atrocities against left-wing rebel groups and the indigenous Maya people.
In 1954, the US-backed CIA staged a coup d'état in Guatemala to overthrow Juan Jose Arevalo's democratically elected government to protect their economic interests after the Communist Guatemalan Party of Labour decided to let go of the United Fruit Company due to its exploitative labour practises. The coup intensified into a civil war which resulted in the death of 2,00,000, displacement of about one million, violent deaths, rape and torture of civilians.
The Catholic Church's Human Rights Office ("ODHA"), chaired by Ronalth Ochaeta and under the guidance of Bishop Gerardi, began documenting the abuses committed all through the war. The report symbolised individual and collective responsibility, a sharp reminder to ensure that such horrific events do not occur again and emphasize that one shall not submit to authority. The assassination of Gerardi, on the other hand, shifted the liberal climate. It was evident that by killing him, the oppressor hoped to dissuade witnesses from coming forward with their accounts; victims who were hesitant to speak earlier were now petrified.
Who is safe if a Bishop on a quest for truth can be assassinated?
The REMHI report was no longer the object of discourse, and the focus shifted to Gerardi. The truth was shrouded in conspiracies and deception. His death roused a carnival, with the authorities implying that Gerardi led a double life and that his death was a crime of passion. The narrative took off since it had all the elements to entertain. The witness testified that he had seen a shirtless guy leave the church residence at an ungodly hour, hinting that it was a "domestic crime", crafted and executed by Mario Orantes, with whom Bishop Gerardi shared parish responsibilities. The plot began to devolve into absurdity. Balu, the German shepherd, was charged with the murder. The latest theories quickly fell apart when Jack Palladino, a private investigator summoned by the Amnesty International and Catholic Church, conducted an autopsy that confirmed no penetrations were made into the skull.
Alvaro Arzu was the president at the time of the assassination. Bishop Gerardi was bludgeoned to death, his face deformed beyond recognition inside a security circle two blocks from the presidential house of Guatemala's most powerful man. The intelligentsia knew the public ministry's investigation was skewed and had no interest in exposing the truth. The public prosecutor had a working relationship with the army.
The crime scene was severely mismanaged, and there were no protocols in place. There have been severe errors in the management of the crime scene and evidence. People were allowed to pass through unchecked, and prosecutors were altering the crime scene. As a result, the ODHA had their own investigation team overseeing the probe, ensuring that the process was fair and transparent.
One of their investigators, Arturo Aguilar, remarks that the first premise is bound to be of a political nature and that one's job as an investigator is to pursue facts unbiasedly. The identity of the perpetrator was a source of much consternation. Various theories circulated, and anonymous calls were made to speculate on the identity of the assailant.
Bishop Gerardi exemplified justice in a country devoid of it. He was a strong and commanding figure who was willing to hear what the others had to say. Guerrillas and the army had achieved political "peace" through force, intimidation and fear, but the church built consensus from within. He sought out the afflicted population to continue the Mayan ethnic cleansing investigations for the REMHI report. He hoped for the evidence to come from them. For them to speak their truth to power, to be resilient in the face of government agents and their atrocities, to articulate the quiet agony they had never spoken of since the genocide. 935 massacres were recorded, with details on how the individual forces carried out their missions.
The bishop was the state's adversary for shattering the efforts of the Government from producing passive citizens and for his statement against the state's relentless breaches of human rights. He was slandered by the military intelligence and was subjected to a failed murder attempt in the past. The army barred him from returning to the Guatemalan territory, and he was exiled to Costa Rica.
The government, army and media nexus birthed a culture of impunity. They truly believed that they are above the rule of law.
However, three military officers were convicted on 8 June 2001 of Gerardi's assassination and sentenced to 30 years imprisonment: Colonel Byron Disrael Lima Estrada, Captain Byron Lima Oliva and José Obdulio Villanueva, as well as the priest Mario Orantes. The judgement was unprecedented. It was a long and gruelling battle against forces wielding a kind of power that no one in their right mind would resist. One day before the trial would begin, the house of one of the three presiding judges was bombed. Subsequent attempts designed to intimidate her, frighten her into resigning to further delay the judicial process were carried out. But she walked into the courtroom the next day. The terror and trepidation, as well as the knowledge of their impending doom, was evident in the eyes of the men on trial. Bishop Juan Gerardi death was a political murder.
This was a watershed moment in contemporary Guatemalan history. It signalled the end of a corrupt, brutal, and racist administration and the emergence of optimism and resilience. Justice prevailed, but the devastating effects of the war persist. The United States' intervention to contain communism was far more important than upholding human rights and civil liberties and it has worsened the social divisions in Guatemala. This interference is held responsible for the rightward shift in the governments that been voted to power ever since.
Today Guatemala continues to aspire to be a truly democratic country. As in the past, power remains in the hands of unscrupulous officials obsessed with authority and power. There is extreme poverty among the general population. In the wake of giant corporations, indigenous people had to sever their connection to the land. There exists a perpetual cycle of uncertainty, anxiety, and fear, yet somewhere there is also hope. There has to be.
#murder trial#justice#human rights#human rights violations#undemocratic#exploitation#ethnic cleansing#death#the wicked powers
1 note
·
View note
Text
168227
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-6R9B-H8?i=613&cc=1874591&cat=29324
001/614 168227
002/615 oah 2529 pt.2
004/617 slate
005/618 continua
007/620 juan romero & ynoscencia hernandez / zapotlanejo
012/625 ricardo leon & luisa quiros / tepic
018/631 juan cervantes & maria candida / tlaltenango
021/634 manuel ramos & josefa arevalo / etzatlan
027/640 simon luna & josefa vallejo / jesus
031/644 mariano lozano & perfecta rubio / compostela
036/649 felipe montano & magdalena montano / atotonilco
042/655 miguel reynoso & maria jesus ramirez / jalostotitlan
049/662 enrique sanchez & cesarea vegara / tlaltenango
052/665 trinidad de leon & silveria munoz / cuquio
056/669 ygnacio aguallo & catarina baeza / mexicalingo
060/673 jose maria donciano de la parra & antonia medellin / matehuala
067/680 yldefonzo aguirre & maria fermina ramirez / jalpa
075/688 luciano anzures & ygnacia gonzalez / jerez
079/692 faustino lopez & teodora rodriguez / panuco
087/700 felipe salcedo & dolores gonzalez / ahuacatlan
093/706 yrenio huerta & telesfora bautista / tabasco
100/713 pedro delgado & margarita esparza / aguascalientes
107/720 mateo ruiz & bacilia caveosos / mazapil
111/724 juan de dios archieaga & blasa gallegos / cocula
117/730 eugenio villapando & martina arellano / asientos
123/736 jose maria gomez & petra valderas / guadalajara
128/741 manuel luque & maria de sacramento banuelos / lagos
134/747 juan castellon & maxima godina / jamay
136/749 bacilio lopez & lucia de los reyes / san gabriel
148/761 rafael miranda & josefa quiros / panuco
155/768 luis de la pena & ygnacia zerra / compostela
159/772 antonio martinez & petra montano / tepic
165/778 pablo garcia & teresa gallardo / san juan
172/785 pedro godines & josefa guerrero / zapotiltic
175/788 juan mantilla & catarina romo / aguascalientes *tree 175/788
179/792 martin de luna & josefa de luna / tepechitlan
184/797 luis de la zorrilla & regina ybanes / fresnillo
190/803 andres casares & maria carmel gonzalez / cuatitlan
194/807 antonio romero & margarita gomez / etzatlan
204/817 tiburcio borrego & maria del refugio alvarez / jerez *carrillo 205/818
207/820 miguel nu & gregoria meza / etzatlan
214/827 maximo aguilera & vicenta ornleas / teocaltiche
218/831 felipe silva & gregoria esparza / ascientos
222/835 santos de la torre & demencia montoya / asientos
226/839 manuel ojegueda & feliciana jimenez / ixtlan
234/847 anacleto guzman & isabel gomez / jalostotitlan
239/852 domingo huerta & luisa santos / ahualulco
246/859 juan de dios flores & maria de jesus tovar / compostela
251/864 victorio garcia & tomasa portillo / nochistlan
254/867 cirilo lopez & zenona jimenez / mexticacan
261/874 ramon calvillo & maria de san juan ybarra / encarnacion
268/881 jose maria godoy & salvadora eledesma / tabasco
275/888 jose maria venacio & maria reyes oliveros / tala
282/895 paulin olivera & catarina alvarez / ojocaliente
289/902 andres cuevas & clemencia del rio / tala
300/913 manuel perez & petra de aro / moyahua
304/917 marcelo garcia & dolores de la torre / tototlan
309/922 jose maria sandoval & gumecinda barragan / calvillo
312/925 vicente gonzalez & florencia diaz / pinos
318/931 miguel lomelin & maria gapita hernandez / arandas
322/935 geronimo rodriguez rivas & maria franco / encarnacion
327/940 jose maria plata & crescenia ybarra / compostela
332/945 fausto benites & cruz silva / zacatecas
337/950 ygnacio salazar & luciana villanueva / compostela
342/955 jose gutierrez & maria alcaras / tamazula
349/962 tomas delgado & ricarda lupian / atemancia
354/967 manuel mata & antonia saucedo / matehuala
357/970 benigna pena & atanacia mora / ayutla
365/978 vicente perez & cecilia coronado / jalostotitlan
373/986 anselmo rodriguez & hermenegilda avalos / san juan (?)
378/991 eulogio anitllon & juana jimenez / jerez
384/997 pedro ygnacio moreno & felicitas moreno / adoves
390/1003 miguel mora & aniceta flores / zapotlanejo
394/1007 juan baptista juarez & maria maxima de jesus moreno / atolinga & tlaltenango
398/1011 agapito borrego & maria garcia / tototlan
404/1017 jose maria carlos de godoy & silveria robles / tlaltenango
407/1020 francisco pedrosa & marcelina martin del campo / san juan de los lagos
414/1027 manuel gonzalez de hermosillo & benedicta morales / analco
418/1031 trinidad munguia & guadalupe castaneda / tamazula
428/1041 antonio zepeda & candelaria luqiun / cocula
433/1046 ygnacio ruiz & pasquala robalcava / yahualica
437/1050 francisco martin & antonia martin / mazatitlan
443/1056 diego perez & cirila lozano / nochistlan
447/1060 jesus rodriguez & agapita camacho / nochistlan *tree 449/1062
451/1064 francisco arias & trinidad macias / tototlan
458/1071 felipe hernandez & guadalupe hernandez / arandas
462/1075 casimiro yanez & bacilia sandoval / teocaltiche
466/1079 faustino lomelin & petra sandoval / teocaltiche
469/1082 juan jose villavaso & apolinaria cardenas / sayula
475/1088 ramon gomez & geronima placencia / yahualica
480/1093 nepomuceno losa & guadalupe gonzalez / tepatitlan
485/1098 jose ana lopez & rufina torres / adoves
497/1110 estanislao espinosa & guadalupe macias / cienega
499/1112 catalino garcia & cayetana martinez / cienega
502/1115 antonio hernandez & dionisia lopez / cienega
505/1118 cacildo davila & petra morillo / villanueva *saldana 513/1126
515/1128 jesus guzman & rafaela hernandez / ahualulco
519/1132 serapio cornejo & ygnacia franco / jalostotitlan
525/1138 manuel salcedo & josefa villalobos / jesus
530/1143 francisco calderon & bartola morales / fresnillo
536/1149 estanislao rodriguez & josefa rubio / autlan
541/1154 severiano ybarra & josefa topete / ameca
545/1158 antonio eugenio gordoa & maria mata / zacatecas
550/1163 apolonio delgadillo & josefa alonzo / istlahuacan
556/1169 antonio mejia & manuela rovalcava / jalostotitlan
568/1181 antonio romero & josefa gonzalez / atotonilco
575/1188 simon curiel & margarita amaral / mascota
578/1191 ascencio cano & romana parada / ixtlan
583/1196 casimiro rico & estefana acosta / mascota
588/1201 miguel machuca & antonia hernandez / ixtlan
592/1205 hilario sanchez & felipa andrade / mexicalingo
597/1210 juan gutierrez & juana ybarra / mexicalingo
599/1212 trinidad garcia de alba & guadalupe rubio / ejtula
606/1219 continua
607/1220 oah 2529 fin
608/1221 end of roll
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Anti-gov’t materials in food packs show Anakpawis' agenda
#PHnews: Anti-gov’t materials in food packs show Anakpawis' agenda
MANILA – An official of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) said Sunday the arrest of six members of militant group Anakpawis who were flagged down in Bulacan for violating strict quarantine protocols shows that the militant marginalized sectors' group is using the difficult situation of Filipinos to advance their interest in discrediting the many efforts of the government during this health crisis.
“They will devise ways and means to mainstream their agenda,” said Marine Brig. General Edgard Arevalo, AFP spokesperson, adding that there is nothing wrong with helping needy kababayans.
Other well-meaning private individuals and corporations, he said, are heeding the government’s call to help our fellow Filipinos.
“But they do so with genuine desire to help. Nothing of this sort of effort of Anakpawis to distribute some goods loaded with anti-government propaganda materials,” he said.
Grand scheme
Meanwhile, a former member of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) on Sunday said the incident unveils the communists’ plan of conducting political agitation during this time of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic.
“It appears now that the incident today in Norzagaray, Bulacan is part of a grand scheme of political agitation and inciting activities of the CPP-NPA-NDF (New People’s Army – National Democratic Front) through their scam operations packaged as ‘Sagip kanayunan, tulong sa masang Anakpawis’,” said alias Rolly, former CPP cadre.
Rolly said the anti-government propaganda materials hidden among the 50 relief food packs that were meant for distribution is Barangay Bigte, Norzagaray expose the communists’ nationwide grand scheme for their operational interventions in their so-called 'mass base areas' in the rural communities.
This, he said, aims to augment their efforts with their armed group, NPA.
“The CPP is mobilizing its 'legal organizations and alliances' to put up the masquerade activities,” he added.
He vowed to expose communist terrorist groups’ schemes to the public and forewarn local government units (LGUs) and security sector agencies.
“All these are geared towards their attacks on the efficiency and competence of President Rodrigo Duterte and the entire government,” he said
Rolly bared that in fact, CPP chairperson Joma Sison has already issued a directive to their 'legal operators' to endeavor alliance initiatives with different LGUs and local officials in order to link-up their schemes of political agitation using the platform issues of the Covid-19 crisis.
Meanwhile, Norzagaray police chief, Lt. Col. Jaime Quiocho, said one of the Anakpawis members arrested in a checkpoint at the boundary of Norzagaray and San Jose del Monte City in Bulacan at around 11 a.m. Sunday is a student of Polytechnic University of the Philippines.
Raymar Guaves, 21, of Bahay Toro, Project 8, Quezon City, and five others were held after failing to present pertinent quarantine travel passes when the public utility jeepney (PUJ) they were riding was flagged down in a checkpoint.
Guaves’ five companions were identified as Karl Mae San Juan, 29, of 58 Road F. Project 6, Quezon City; Marlon Lester Gueta, 26, of Chesnut St. Good Harvest Park Subdivision Barangay 172, 1422, Caloocan City; Robero Medel, PUJ driver, 52, of 65K 10th St. Kamias, Quezon City; Eriberto Peña Jr., 60, of Ricafort, Purok 08 Tingkong, Mangga, San Jose Del Monte City, Bulacan; and Tobi Estrada, 22, of 4B West Teachers Village, Malingap St., Quezon City.
Upon inspection of the jeep, Norzagaray police personnel manning the checkpoint found 50 food packs and anti-government materials including a tarpaulin with markings that read “SAGIP KANAYUNAN AND TULONG ANAKPAWIS”.
The group was reportedly bound for Kalye 11, Barangay Bigte, Norzagaray to distribute food packs containing rice with vitamin tablets, and hygiene kits, among others.
The relief packs were later turned over to Barangay Bigte officer in charge Rose Cappa.
Quiocho, in a telephone interview, said Gaves and his companions, who claimed to be just Anakpawis volunteers, were brought to the Regional Police Office (PRO) 3 in Camp Olivas, San Fernando, Pampanga where a case of violation of Bayanihan to Heal as One Act is being prepared against them.
President, on March 25, signed into law RA 11469 otherwise known as the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, which is valid for three months unless extended by Congress.
Section 6 of the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act lists down the penalties and violations of the law, including imprisonment of two months or a fine of P10,000 to P1 million or both.
According to Quiocho, PRO-3 Director, Brig. Gen Rodel Sermonia, lamented that behind the help extended by some groups like Anakpawis is the motive to lambaste the government.
Sermonia said this is instead the time to help all government agencies in fighting the dreaded Covid-19. (PNA)
***
References:
* Philippine News Agency. "Anti-gov’t materials in food packs show Anakpawis' agenda." Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1100347 (accessed April 20, 2020 at 08:24AM UTC+14).
* Philippine News Agency. "Anti-gov’t materials in food packs show Anakpawis' agenda." Archive Today. https://archive.ph/?run=1&url=https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1100347 (archived).
0 notes
Text
Famous one-eyed matador scalped by bull in gory video
http://dalaznews.com/news/most-popular/famous-one-eyed-matador-scalped-by-bull-in-gory-video/
In 2016, the horn of a bull tears the accommodate of Spanish bullfighter Juan Jose Padilla for the duration of a bullfight at the San Fermin Competitors in Pamplona. (Reuters)
WARNING: GRAPHIC Material Below
A effectively-recognized 1-eyed Spanish matador -- who was earlier gored at least two occasions -- seasoned 1 much more horrific harm much more than the weekend when a bull mauled and scalped him in entrance of a stunned crowd.
Juan Jose Padilla, 45, was in the bullfighting ring in the Spanish metropolis of Arevalo when the bull arrived charging towards him. Padilla, regarded to supporters as “The Pirate,” fell all by means of his escape, top to the bull trampling and mauling him.
A quantity of persons rushed to help him. Padilla obtained up with a piece of his scalp dangling from the excellent side of his head.
The matador underwent emergency surgical therapy and had the portion of the scalp appropriately reattached.
“I’m actually completely, and want to assure every single individual that my ailment quickly soon after the incident is great,” Padilla told the Spanish paper Aplausos quickly soon after the approach.
The daring bullfighter talked about he methods to return to the arena correct soon after he recovers — which is not surprising contemplating his previous. Padilla is 1 of Spain’s most effectively recognized matadors and he has been rewarded and praised for his bullfighting capabilities.
The decades of bullfighting, nonetheless, have taken a toll on his physique. Padilla has endured 38 accidents prior to Sunday’s scalping, RT claimed. He just about missing his existence in 2001 when a bull pierced him in the throat. Then in 2011, his eye was eliminated when a bull gored him.
He also missing his listening to in his excellent ear, seasoned a broken jaw and skull in the 2011 incident.
Earlier 12 months, Padilla was gored in the thigh and chest and endured a punctured lung.
Katherine Lam is a breaking and trending details electronic producer for Fox Data. Stick to her on Twitter at @bykatherinelam
0 notes
Text
Baybayin Accepted Abstracts
1. Lineses, Edwin/ DLSU Dasma
philippine popular religiosity: sanctity from profanity in a globalised society
2. Redubla, Jomar/ FEU Manila
Dewey Analysis on k to 12 program in the philippines
3. Pascual, Davies/ DLSU Manila
ASHNAMON VOYANAZAR! Ang encantadia bilang pintuan sa pagbukas ng identidad ng mag lipunan gamit ang codes of television ni john fiske
4. Roxas-Rojales, Ma. Gemma F./ DLSU manila
walang aray! isang pag-aaral sa sayaw sa apoy, sanghiyang at mag anting-anting ng alfonso, cavite bilang isang relihiyosong ritwal
5. Reyes, Juan Apolinario/ LPU Batangas
Marinduque vs. Sea Level Rise Land-Inundation scenarios
6. Orque, Francis O. Philippine Science High School Manila campus
wika: sa mundo ng iba’t ibang larang ng PSHS-MC
7. Pantaleon, John Kelvin SL./ URS Pililia Campus
kayas-kawayan: naghihingalong kultura sa bayan ng morong, rizal
8. Ani, Aileen Concepcion/ DLSU Manila CLA
Pag-aaswang: semyolohikal na pagsusuri sa demonisasyon sa kababaihan sa mga serre ng pelikulang “shake, rattle & roll”
9. Juezan, Jared Ram A. at Santiago, Alexis E./ URS Pililia campus grad school
Pagtutuli: Ang unti-unting pagkawala ng mga lalaking “pukpok”
10.Veloso, Grace A. URS Pililia campus grad school
ang panganganga ng mag kabayaang may mapupulang ngiti
11.Santiago, Vincent Christopher/ UP Diliman
punting morong: ang mga lingguwistikong katangian at panloob na baryasyon ng tagalong morong
12.Biteng, Richard/ DepEd
pamitinan cave: the place of the first crut of katipunan
13. Guevarra, Aldrine V. / UST
the historical analysis of the unknown “intrauros walls” in polillo,quezon
14~18. Perez Jr. Ramón Florencio; de Torres, Jimboy; de Villa, Malou; Jerusalem, Mariel; Mercado, Mariel/Joseph Marello InstituteSan Juan, Batangas
San juanenos: barks nga ba?
19. Perez, Buko Joe Joseph/ Marello Institute
San Juan, Batangas
in defense of jose rizal’s el filibusterismo against the plagiary allegations
20. Pernia, Rosalie /MSC SoED
facebook as social media
21.Arevalo, Irene M./ MSC SoED
sining at culturing tagalog
23.Mabutot, Rebecca /MSC SLA bac3
pag-uugnay ng moriones festival ng marinduque at mindoro
24.Malarayap, April Rose/ MSC SLA abe3
architectural creativity of marindukanon: arts and culture in the province of marinduque
25.Sapungan, Jan Erika/ MSC SLA bac3
epekto ng pagamit ng wikang marindukanon sa facebook
26. Solsona, Edelyn/ MSC SLA abe3
indigenous theology: theology of mangyan natives in oriental mindoro
27. Victor Clado Francia/ University of Santo Tomas
CULTURE-ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE LOCAL AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK ENABLED BY THE “TINDIG WALIS” IMPACT OF PAHIYAS FESTIVALIN THE PHILIPPINES
28. MONTEROZO, Leslie Ann/ MSC SoEd
HOW DID TAGALOG IDENTITY STANDS ITS OWN?
29.La ROSA, Althea/ MSC SLA BAC 3
EpektoNgManilenyongTagalogSaMarindukanon
30. Deryl Kai S. Sigue/ MSC SLA BAC 3
Significance and Effects of Social Media in Millennial’s Time
31.Jhudit J. Larosa/ MSC SLA BAC 3
Essence and Effects of Using Marinduque’s Native Language in Facebook
32. MONTON, Ladylyn /MSC SLA BAC 3
Pagkamulat ng mga Kabataang Marinduqueno sa Lenggwaheng Marindukanon
33. SEMILLA, Hayden /MSC SLA ABE3B
Mogpog’s Religious Holy WeekTerminologiesand It's ProfaneMeanings
34. Aubrey Pielago/ MSC SLA ABE3B
The Cultural Values and Ethics of Barangay Maligaya: Negative and Positive Side
35.PEREDA, Christine Joy/ MSC SLA ABE3B
Toward a Filipino-Language: Philippine Studies
36.Angel Mae Y. Mabunga/ MSC SLA ABE3A
Southern Tagalog Laguage: The Language of Romblon Province
37.Myca Fanoga/MSC SLA ABE4
PAGSUSUNONG NG PUPUWA IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF GASAN
38.DECENA, Kayzelle Joy/ MSC SLA ABE3B
“Introduction to Marindukanon: Dialect Differences of Sta. Cruz and Boac District”
39.MENDEJA, Jermelyn /MSC SLA ABE3B
“Dialectal Differences between Marindukanon and Manila Tagalog”
40.LAZARTE, Lorena/ MSC SLA BAC 3
Bila–Bila Festival in Marinduque
41.GORUMBA, Jennifer et.al/ Palompon Institute of Technology
Mga Isyung GAD
42.VIACRUCIS, Ferdelyn / Palompon Institute of Technology
PasusuringFeminismo
43. ENGLIS, Jessalyn Marie/ Palompon Institute of Technology
Pamamaraan at Pagkatuto
44. Dennis L. Jardeleza/ MSC SoEd
Tagalog-ness (What is that?) – UNIQUE VIEWPOINTS
45.Mazon, Mariel/ MSC SLA ABE3B
-Is there a Filipino Philosophy
46.John Earl M. Manlisis/MSC SLA ABE3B
Ang Lunduyan: The Espiritistas’ Spirituality along with their Religious Beliefs and Practices in Gasan, Marinduque
47.MONTALBAN, Donna/MSC SLA ABE3B
Fragments of Filipino Philosophy of Life
48.MAGCULANG, Abegail/ MSC SLA BAC 3
WhenASacredIsAlsoAProfane:AncientFilipinoSpirituality
49.GLADYS P. NALANGAN/ University of the Philippine Los Banos
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE PROVISION ON PUBLIC MORALS BY THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAVITE
50. Rizalyn M. Magno/ MSC SLA ABE3B
ANG LUNDUYAN: DISTINGUISHING THE ELEMENTS OF ITS WORSHIP SERVICE AND ITS EFFECT ON PEOPLE'S SPIRITUALITY
51.SANTELICES Rosa Lea /MSC SoEd
Recent Trends In Filipino Philosophy
52.Bianca Nicole L. Napal/ MSC SLA BAC 3
THEATRO: TULAY SA PAGBIIBIGAY BUHAY SA SINING AT KULTURA NG KABATAANG MOGPOGENO
53.MILITAR,Kimberlyn, R./ MSC SLA ABE3B
Exploring the Literature of Marinduque (Santa Cruz)
54. Marielle Pastorfide/ MSC SLA ABE3B
Native Tagalog in Marinduque and Tagalog in city, Manila
55.TENORIO, Jose Alejandro/ De La Salle University - Dasmarinas
UnderstandingFilipinoValues
56. Rommel M. Mazo/ De La Salle University - Dasmarinas
The Oppression of the PWDs in the Philippines from the Perspective of Iris Marion Young
57. NANTES, noreen Shy/ MSC SLA ABE3A
Teorya at Praktikang Tagalog: Theatre Group; Senakulo/Pugutan in Municipality of “Boac” and “Gasan”
58. Zia, Oliveros/ MSC SoEd
Philippine Studies/Filipinolohiya
59.MALINAO, Melanie. MSC SoEd
NganiBayangMarinduque
60. CALIGUIAgregorio /University of the Philippines – Diliman Asian Center
Bakla on the parallax view of the Philippine postcolonial culture
61.Roan Castillo/ MSC SLA ABE4
Philippine Studies/Araling Pilipino/Pilipinolohiya sa Wikang Filipino: Pagpopook at Pagdadalumat sa Loob ng Kapantasang Pilipino
62.Rhochie Avelino E. Matienzo /University of Sto Tomas
“Ang Mukha ng Kapwa: Pagmumuni sa Piling Karanasang Pilipino ayon sa Etika ni Levinas”
63. Norberto M. Nataño/ University of Rizal System - Antipolo
MGA KWENTONG BAYAN OF ANGONO, RIZAL, PHILIPPINES: THEIR PROMOTIONAL IMPLICATIONS ON TOURISM COMMUNICATION CAMPAIGN
64+65. Ken Gorro; Mary Jane Sabellano /University of San Carlos
National University
An Analysis of Suggestions for DRR Strategies in an Urban Barangay in Rizal
66~68.Nathaniel Oco; Jeffrey Rosario Ancheta; Rachel Roxas
Computer-assisted manual analyses of text through topic modeling and word embedding: A case study of typhoon-related tweets
National University; Bicol University; University of the Immaculate Conception
69. JABALLAS, Dianne P./ MSC SLA ABE3B
Sining at Kulturang Tagalog: HERITAGE HOUSES in the District of Mogpog, Marinduque.
70. Ross Pabinguit Heruela/ University of the Philippines - Baguio
The “Lalaki” of the Hanunuo in the Ambahan: A Textual Critical Reading
71. MANUEVO, JEZABELE P. lang424
TAGALOG ARTS AND CULTURE ( SINING AT KULTURANG TAGALOG ) ‘’ MOGPOG’S KANGGA FESTIVAL
72. Shiela C. Cabigayan/ Lang424
The Dialects of CALABARZON
73.Jenny O.Motol/ lang424
Southeast Asian studies
74.REY, Evelyn M. lang314B
Treasure the Boac, Marinduque Literature
75.Lorelyn L. Historillo/ Lang 314
Problems and Prospects of Area Studies on and within Southeast Asia
76.LLANTE, Jhon Paul/ lang314A
Legend of Marinduque: An Archetypal Literary Criticism
77.JOANNA L. MAMENG /lang314A
SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES Civil Society Actors Digitally Connect in Vietnam: Recording Spheres of Resistance
78.MASCULINO, Dannicah/ lang314A
MARINDUQUE’S PRIDE: SOLE TRIBUTE IN CULTURAL PRACTICES
79.ROLDAN, Angelica/ lang314A
Mangyan Tribes in Occidental Mindoro Spiritual Belief and Practices
80.Deena Waquiz/ lang314A
Language distinguishes of Marinduqueto Romblon
81.RUBYANN R. LAYA/ lang424
The Key to the Cultural Past
82. Daypal, Angelica M./ lang424
Literatura at Katimugang Tagalog
83. Lyra Joy S. Moaje/ lang424
Pluralism: Comparison of the Early and Present Political Systems In the Philippines
84.ARREN JAY M. NABOS/ lang424
TAGALOG-NESS
85. Limbo, Lonilyn/ MSC SoEd
Analysis on the spiritual practices of marinduquenos
86.Go, Ma. Verona/ TAO SA LIKOD NG MASKARANG BULAKLAKAN
87.Jinang, Jhonna J./ Ang Karanasan ng Pagsali sa Bila-Bila Festival
88.Jornadal, Roschelle M./ Legal bases ng Marinduque Day tuwing Setyembre 13
89.Labaguis, Ma. Yvette L.
Tagalog sa Mundong Makabago
90.Laroza, ydha marie
Diverse Connection of Marinduquenos through their Culture
91.Lasac, Kristine Joy L.
Diyalekto ng Eastern at Western Marinduque (Eastern and Western Marinduque Dialect)
92.Lora, Ronnabelle Z.
Expounding the Creativity and Artistic Design of Kalesayahan Celebration in Gasan throughout the Southern Tagalog Region: An Input to Culture and Arts Celebration
93.Manrique, Adel Anshenette M.
pluralism
94.Matre, Malyn Rose L.
PilosopiyangTagalog
95.Piguerra, Irish K.
Kalutang playing
96.Ypanto, Mark Gil
Literaturang sa Katimugang Tagalog
97. Epa Arwin Jones
Inang uyang: Filipino Spirituality
98.Mangana, Sherlyn R.
Recent Trends in Filipino philosophy
99.Kamaruddin Bin Alawi Mohammad
Muslim Filipino Spirituality
100.Greg Dulay
The Philosophical Taste of Deliciousness and Beauty of Ilocano Dishes
101. Nonia Tiongco
Serendipity: Light and Shadow in the Preservation of the Heritage of my Hometown Santa Rosa
0 notes
Text
Expert: It has been amusing watching the New York Times (Times) and its fellow mainstream media (MSM) cohort express their dismay over the rise and spread of “fake news.” They take it as an obvious truth that what they provide is straightforward and unbiased fact-based news. They do offer such news, but they also provide a steady flow of their own varied forms of genuinely fake news, often in disseminating false or misleading information supplied them by the CIA, other branches of government, and sites of corporate power. An important form of MSM fake news is that which is presented while suppressing information that calls the preferred news into question. This was the case with “The Lie That Wasn’t Shot Down,” the title of a January 18, 1988 Times editorial referring to a propaganda claim of five years earlier that the editors had swallowed and never looked into any further. The lie–that the Soviets knew that Korean airliner 007, which they shot down on August 31, 1983, was a civilian plane–was eventually uncovered by congressman Lee Hamilton, not by the Times. MSM fake news is especially likely where a party line is quickly formed on a topic, with deviationism therefore immediately looking naïve, unpatriotic or simply wrong. In a dramatic illustration, in a book chapter entitled “Worthy and Unworthy Victims,” Noam Chomsky and I showed that coverage by Time, Newsweek, CBS News and the New York Times of the 1984 murder of the priest Jerzy Popieluzko in communist Poland, a dramatic and politically useful event for the politicized western MSM, exceeded their coverage of the murders of 100 religious figures killed in Latin America by U.S. client states in the post-World War II years taken together.1 It was cheap and free of any negative feedback to focus heavily on the “worthy” victim, whereas looking closely at the deaths of the 100 would have required an expensive and sometimes dangerous research effort and would have upset the State Department. But it was a form of fake news to discriminate so heavily with news (and indignation) on a politically useful victim while ignoring large numbers whose murder the political establishments wanted downplayed or completely suppressed. The Fake News Tradition on Russia in the New York Times Fake news on Russia is a Times tradition that can be traced back at least as far as the 1917 revolution. In a classic study of the paper’s coverage of the Russian revolution from February 1917 to March 1920, Walter Lippmann and Charles Merz found that “From the point of view of professional journalism the reporting of the Russian Revolution is nothing short of a disaster. On the essential questions the net effect was almost always misleading, and misleading news is worse than none at all….They can fairly be charged with boundless credulity, and an untiring readiness to be gulled, and on many occasions with a downright lack of common sense.”2 Lippmann and Merz found that strong editorial bias clearly fed into news reporting. The editors very much wanted the communists to lose, and serving this end caused the paper to report atrocities that didn’t happen and the imminent fall of the Bolshevik regime on a regular basis (at least 91 times). There was a heavy and uncritical acceptance of official handouts and reliance on statements from unidentified “high authority.” This was standard Times practice. This fake news performance of 1917-1920 was repeated often in the years that followed. The Soviet Union was an enemy target up to World War II, and Times coverage was consistently hostile. With the end of World War II and the Soviet Union at that point a major military power, and soon a rival nuclear power, the Cold War was on. Anti-communism became a major U.S. religion, and the Soviet Union was quickly found to be trying to conquer the world and needing containment. With this ideology in place and U.S. plans for its own real global expansion of power well established,3 the communist threat would now help sustain the steady growth of the military-industrial complex and repeated interventions to deal with purported Soviet aggressions. An Early Great Crime: Guatemala One of the most flagrant cases in which the Russian threat was used to justify U.S.-organized violence was the overthrow of the social democratic government of Guatemala in 1954 by a small proxy army invading from U.S. ally Somoza’s Nicaragua. This action was provoked by government reforms that upset U.S. officials, including a 1947 law permitting the formation of labor unions, and government plans to buy back (at tax rate valuations) and distribute to landless peasants some of the unused land owned by United Fruit Company and other large landowners. The U.S., which had been perfectly content with the earlier 14-year- long dictatorship of Jose Ubico, could not tolerate this democratic challenge and the elected government, led by Jacobo Arbenz, was soon charged with assorted villainies, with the main fake news base of an alleged Red capture of the Guatemalan government.4 In the pre-invasion propaganda campaign the unified MSM leveled a stream of false charges of extreme repression, threats to its neighbors, and the communist takeover. The Times featured these alleged abuses and threats repeatedly from 1950 onward (my favorite, Sidney Gruson’s “How Communists Won Control of Guatemala,” March 1, 1953). Arbenz and his predecessor, Juan Jose Arevalo, had carefully avoided establishing any embassies with Soviet bloc countries, fearing U.S. reactions. But it was to no avail. Following the removal of Arbenz and installation of a right-wing dictatorship, court historian Ronald Schneider, after studying 50,000 documents seized from communist sources in Guatemala, found that not only did the communists never control the country, but that the Soviet Union “made no significant or even material investment in the Arbenz regime” and was too preoccupied with internal problems to concern itself with Central America.5 The coup government quickly attacked and decimated the organized groups that had formed in the democratic era, like peasant, worker and teacher organizations. Arbenz had won 65 percent of the votes in a free election, but the “liberator” Castillo Armas quickly won a “plebiscite” with 99.6 percent of the vote. Although this is a result familiar in totalitarian regimes, the MSM had lost interest in Guatemala and barely mentioned this electoral outcome. The Times had claimed back in 1950 that U.S. Guatemala policy “is not trying to block social and economic progress but is interested in seeing that Guatemala becomes a liberal democracy.”6 But in the aftermath the editors failed to note that the result of U.S. policy was precisely to “block social and economic progress,” and via the installation of a regime of terror. In 2011, more than half a century after 1954, Elizabeh Malkin reported in the Times that Guatemalan president Alvaro Colom had apologized for that ”great crime [the violent overthrow of the Arbenz government in 1954] …an act of aggression to a government starting its democratic spring.” (“An apology for a Guatemalan Coup, 57 Years Later,” October 20, 2011). Malkin mentions that, according to president Colom, the Arbenz family is “seeking an apology from the United States for its role” in the “great Crime.” There has never been any apology or even acknowledgement of its role in the Great Crime by the editors of the New York Times. Another Great Crime: Vietnam There were many fake news reports in the Times and other mainstream publications during the Vietnam war. The claim that the Times was anti-Vietnam-war is misleading and essentially false. In Without Fear or Favor, former Times reporter Harrison Salisbury acknowledged that in 1962, when U.S. intervention escalated, the Times was “deeply and consistently” supportive of the war policy.7 He contends that the paper became steadily more oppositional from 1965, culminating in the publication of the Pentagon Papers in 1971. But Salisbury fails to recognize that from 1954 to the present the paper never abandoned the Cold War framework and language of apologetics, according to which the U.S. was resisting somebody else’s aggression and protecting “South Vietnam.” The paper never applied the word aggression to this country, but used it freely in referring to North Vietnamese actions and those of the National Liberation Front in the southern half of Vietnam. The various halts in the U.S. bombing war in 1965 and later in the alleged interest of “giving peace a chance” were also fake news, as the Johnson administration used the halts to quiet antiwar protests, while making it clear to the Vietnamese that U.S. officials demanded full surrender. The Times and its colleagues swallowed this bait without a murmur of dissent.8 Furthermore, although from 1965 onward the Times was willing to publish more information that put the war in a less favorable light, it never broke from its heavy dependence on official sources or its reluctance to check out official lies or explore the damage being wrought on Vietnam and its civilian population by the U.S. war machine. In contrast with its eager pursuit of Cambodian refugees from the Khmer Rouge after April 1975, the paper rarely sought out testimony from the millions of Vietnamese refugees fleeing U.S. bombing and chemical warfare. In its opinion columns as well, the new openness was limited to commentators who accepted the premises of the war and would confine their criticisms to its tactical problems and costs–;to us. From beginning to end those who criticized the war as aggression and immoral at its root were excluded from the debate by the Times.9 The 1981 Papal Assassination Attempt. The “Missile Gap,” and “Humanitarian Intervention” in Yugoslavia Papal Assassination Attempt. A major contribution to Cold War propaganda was provided by fake news on the assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II in Rome in May 1981. This was a time when the Reagan administration was trying hard to demonize the Soviet Union as an “evil empire.” The shooting of the Pope by the Turkish fascist Ali Agca was quickly tied to Moscow, helped by Agca’s confession, after 17 months imprisonment, interrogations, threats, inducements, and access to the media, that the Bulgarians and Soviet KGB were behind it. There was never any credible evidence of this connection, the claims were implausible, and the corruption in the process was remarkable. (See Manufacturing Consent, chapter 4 and Appendix 2). And Agca also periodically claimed to be Jesus Christ. The case against the Bulgarians (and implicitly the KGB) was lost even in Italy’s extremely biased and politicized judicial framework. But the Times bought it, and gave it long, intensive and completely uncritical attention, as did most of the U.S. media. In 1991, in Senate hearings on the qualifications of Robert Gates to head the CIA, former CIA officer Melvin Goodman testified that the CIA knew [from the start that Agca’s confessions were false because they had “very good penetration” of the Bulgarian secret services. The Times omitted this statement by Goodman in reporting on his testimony. In the same year. with Bulgaria now a member of the Free World, conservative analyst Allen Weinstein obtained permission to examine Bulgarian secret service files on the papal assassination attempt. His mission was widely reported when he went, including in the Times, but when he returned without having found anything implicating Bulgaria or the KGB, a number of papers, including the Times, found this not newsworthy. Missile Gap. There was a great deal of fake news in the “missile gap” and other gap eras, from roughly 1975 to 1986, with Times reporters passing along official and often false news in a regular stream. An important case occurred in the mid-1970s, at a time when the U.S. war-party was trying to escalate the Cold War and arms race. A 1975 report of CIA professionals found that the Soviets were aiming only for nuclear parity. This was unsatisfactory, so CIA head George H.W. Bush appointed a new team of hardliners, who soon found that the Soviets were achieving nuclear superiority and getting ready to fight a nuclear war. This Team B report was taken at face value in a Times front page article of December 26, 1976 by David Binder, who failed to mention its political bias or purpose and made no attempt by tapping experts with different views to get at the truth. The CIA admitted in 1983 that the Team B estimates were fabrications. But throughout this period, 1975-1986, the Times supported the case for militarization by disseminating lots of fake news. Much of this false information was convincingly refuted by Tom Gervasi in his classic The Myth of Soviet Military Supremacy (New York: Harper & Row, 1986), a book never reviewed in the paper despite the paper’s frequent attention to its subject matter. Yugoslavia and “Humanitarian Intervention.” The 1990s wars of dismantlement of Yugoslavia succeeded in removing an independent government from power and replacing it with a broken Serbian remnant and poor and unstable failed states in Bosnia and Kosovo. It did provide unwarranted support for the new concept of “humanitarian intervention,” which rested on a mass of fake news. The demonized Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic was not an ultra-nationalist seeking a “Greater Serbia,” but rather a non-aligned leader on the Western hit list who tried to help Serb minorities in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo remain in Yugoslavia as the U.S. and EU supported a legally questionable exodus by several constituent Yugoslav Republics. He supported each of the proposed settlements of these conflicts, sabotaged by Bosnian and U.S. officials who wanted better terms or the outright military defeat of Serbia, the latter of which they achieved. Milosevic had nothing to do with the July 1995 Srebrenica massacre, which involved Bosnian Serbs taking revenge on Bosnian Muslim soldiers who had been ravaging nearby Bosnian Serb villages from their base in Srebrenica under NATO protection. The several thousand Serb civilian deaths were essentially unreported in the MSM, while the numbers of Srebrenica executed victims were correspondingly inflated. The Times’s reporting on these events was fake news on a systematic basis.10 The Putin Era: A Golden Age of Fake News The U.S. establishment was shocked and thrilled with the 1989-1991 fall of the Soviet Union, and its members were happy with the policies carried out under President Boris Yeltsin, a virtual U.S. client, under whose rule ordinary Russians suffered a calamity but a small set of oligarchs was able to loot the broken state. Yeltsin’s election victory in 1996, greatly assisted by U.S. consultants, advice and money, and otherwise seriously corrupt, was, for the editors of the Times, “A Victory for Russian Democracy” (NYT, ed, July 4, 1996). They were not bothered by either the electoral corruption, the creation of a grand-larceny-based economic oligarchy, or, shortly thereafter, the new rules centralizing power in the office of president.11 Yeltsin’s successor, Vladimir Putin, by gradually abandoning the Yeltsin era subservience was thereby perceived as a steadily increasing menace. His re-election in 2012, although surely less corrupt than Yeltsin’s in 1996, was treated harshly in the media. The lead Times article on May 5, 2012 featured “a slap in the face” from OSCE observers, claims of no real competition, and “thousands of anti-government protesters gathered in Moscow square to chant ‘Russia without Putin’” (Ellen Barry and Michael Schwartz, “After Election, Putin Faces Challenges to Legitimacy”). There had been no “challenges to legitimacy” reported in the Times after Yeltsin’s corrupt victory in 1996. The process of Putin demonization escalated with the Ukraine crisis of 2014 and its sequel of Kiev warfare against Eastern Ukraine, Russian support of the East Ukraine resistance, and the Crimean referendum and absorption of Crimea by Russia. This was all declared “aggression” by the U.S. and its allies and clients, sanctions were imposed on Russia, and a major U.S.-NATO military buildup was initiated on Russia’s borders. Tensions mounted further with the shootdown of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over southeastern Ukraine, effectively, but almost surely falsely, blamed on the “pro-Russian” rebels and Russia itself.12 A further cause of demonization and anti-Russian hostility resulted from the escalated Russian intervention in Syria from 2015 in support of Bashar al-Saddad and against ISIS and al-Nusra, an offshoot of al-Qaeda. The U.S. and its NATO and Middle East allies had been committing aggression against Syria, in de facto alliance with ISIS and al-Nusra, for several years. Russian intervention turned the tide, the U.S. (Saudi, etc.) goal of removing Saddad was upset and the tacit U.S. allies ISIS and al-Nusra were also weakened. Certainly demonic behavior by Putin! The Times has treated these further developments with unstinting apologetics–for the February 2014 coup in Kiev, which it never calls a coup, with the U.S. role in the overthrow of the elected government of Victor Yanukovych suppressed, and with anger and horror at the Crimea referendum and Russian absorption, which it never allows to be a defensive response to the Kiev coup. Its call for punishment of the casualty-free Russian “aggression” in Crimea is in marked contrast with its apologetics for the million-plus-casualty–rich U.S. aggression “of choice” (not defensive) in Iraq from March 2003 on. The editors and liberal columnist Paul Krugman angrily cite Putin’s lack of respect for international law,13 with their internalized double standard exempting their own country from criticism for its repeated violations of that law. In the Times’s reporting and opinion columns Russia is regularly assailed as expansionist and threatening its neighbors, but virtually no mention is made of NATO’s expansion up to the Russian borders and first-strike-threat placement of anti-missile weapons in Eastern Europe, the latter earlier claimed to be in response to a missile threat from Iran! Analyses by political scientist John Mearsheimer and Russia authority Stephen F. Cohen that featured this NATO advance could not make it into the opinion pages of the Times.14 On the other hand, a member of the Russian Pussy Riot band, Maria Alyokhina, was given op-ed space to denounce Putin and Russia,15 and the punk-rock group was granted a meeting with the Times editorial board. Between January 1 and March 31, 2014 the paper had 23 articles featuring the Pussy Riot group and its alleged significance as a symbol of Russian limits on free speech. Pussy Riot had disrupted a church service in Moscow and only stopped upon police intervention, which was at the request of the church authorities. A two year prison sentence followed. In contrast, in February 2014, 84 year old Sister Megan Rice was sentenced to four years in prison in the U.S. for having entered a nuclear weapons site in July 2012 and carried out a symbolic protest action. The Times gave this news a tiny mention in its National Briefing section under the title “Tennessee Nun is Sentenced for Peace Protest.” No op-ed columns or meeting with the Times board for Rice. There are worthy and unworthy protesters as well as victims. As regards Syria, with Russian help the Assad forces were able to dislodge the rebels from Aleppo, to the dismay of Washington and the MSM. It has been enlightening to see how much concern has been expressed over casualties to civilians in Aleppo, with pictures of forsaken children and many stories of civilian distress. The Times focused heavily on those civilians and children, with great indignation at Putin-Assad inhumanity,16 in sharp contrast with their virtual silence on civilian casualties in Falluja in 2004 and beyond, and recently in rebel-held areas of Syria, and in Mosul (Iraq), under U.S. and allied attack.17 The differential treatment of worthy and unworthy victims has been in full sway in dealing with Syria, displayed again with the chemical weapons casualties and Trump bombing response in April 2017 (discussed below). A further and important phase of intensifying Russophobia may be dated from the October 2016 presidential debates, where Hillary Clinton declared that Mr. Trump would be a Putin “puppet” as president, and her campaign stressed this threat. This emphasis increased after the election, with the help of the media and intelligence services, as the Clinton camp sought to explain the election loss, maintain party control, and possibly get the election result overturned in the courts or electoral college by blaming the Trump victory on Russia. The Putin connection was given great impetus by the January 6, 2017 release of a report of the Office of Director of National Intelligence (DNI), on Background of Assessing Russian Activities and Intention in Recent US Elections This short document spends more than half of its space describing the Russian-sponsored RT-TV network, which it treats as an illegitimate propaganda source given its sponsorship and sometimes critical reports on U.S. policy and institutions! RT is allegedly part of Russia’s “influence campaign,” and the DNI says that “We assess the influence campaign aspired to help President-elect Trump’s chances of victory when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to the President-elect.” There is no semblance of proof that there was a planned “campaign” rather than an ongoing expression of opinion and news judgments. All the logic and proofs of a Russian “influence campaign” could be applied with at least equal force to U.S. media and Radio Free Europe’s treatment of any Russian election, and of course the U.S. intervention in the 1996 Russian election was overt, direct and went far beyond any “influence campaign.” As regards the DNI’s proof of a more direct Russian intervention in the U.S. election, the authors concede the absence of “full supporting evidence,” but they provide no supporting evidence—only assertions, assessments, assumptions and guesses. It states that “We assess that …Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2015” designed to defeat Mrs. Clinton, and “to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process,” but it provides no evidence whatsoever for any such order. It also provides no evidence that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the e-mails of Clinton and former Clinton campaign manager Podesta, or that it gave hacked information to WikiLeaks. Julian Assange and former British diplomat Craig Murray have repeatedly claimed that these sources were leaked by local insiders, not hacked by anybody. And the veteran intelligence agency experts William Binney and Ray McGovern also contend that the WikiLeaks evidence was surely leaked, not hacked.18 It is also notable that among the three intelligence agencies who signed the DNI document, only “moderate confidence” in its findings was expressed by the National Security Agency (NSA), the agency that would most clearly be in possession of proof of Russian hacking and transmission to WikiLeaks as well as any “orders” from Putin. But the Times has taken the Russian hacking story as established fact, despite the absence of hard evidence (as with the Reds ruling Guatemala, the “missile gaps,” etc.). Times reporter David Sanger refers to the report’s “damning and surprisingly detailed account of Russia’s efforts to undermine the American electoral system,” but he then acknowledges that the published report “contains no information about how the agencies had …come to their conclusions.”19 The report itself includes the amazing statement that “Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.” This is a denial of the credibility of its own purported evidence (i.e., “assessments”). Furthermore, if the report was based on “intercepts of conversations” as well as hacked computer data, as Sanger and the DNI claim, why has the DNI failed to quote a single conversation showing Putin’s alleged orders and plans to destabilize the West? The Times never cites or gives editorial space to William Binney, Ray McGovern or Craig Murray, who are dissident authorities on hacking technology, methodology and the specifics of the DNC hacks. But op-ed space was given to Louise Mensch’s “What to ask about Russian hacking” (NYT, March 17, 2017). Mensch is a notorious conspiracy theorist with no technical background in this area and who is described by Nathan Robinson and Alex Nichols as best-known for “spending most of her time on Twitter issuing frenzied denunciations of imagined armies of online ‘Putinbots’” and is “one of the least credible people on the internet.”20 But she is published in the Times because, in contrast with the well-informed and credible William Binney and Craig Murray, she follows the party line, taking Russian hacking of the DNC as a premise. The CIA’s brazen intervention in the election process in 2016 and 2017 broke new ground in secret service politicization. Former CIA head Michael Morell had an August 5, 2016 op-ed in the Times entitled “I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton”; and former CIA boss Michael Hayden had an op-ed in the Washington Post just days before the election, entitled “Former CIA Chief:- Trump is Russia’s Useful Fool” (November 3, 2016). Morell had another op-ed in the Times on January 6, now openly assailing the new president (“Trump’s Dangerous Anti-CIA Crusade”). These attacks were unrelievedly insulting to Trump and laudatory to Clinton, even making Trump a traitor; they also make it clear that Clinton’s more pugnacious approach to Syria and Russia is much preferred to Trump’s leanings toward negotiation and cooperation with Russia. This was also true of the further scandal with former Trump Defense Intelligence nominee Michael Flynn’s call from the Russian Ambassador, which possibly included exchanges about future Trump administration policy actions. This was quickly grasped by the outgoing Obama officials, security personnel and MSM, with the FBI interrogating Flynn and with widespread expressions of horror at Flynn’s action, allegedly possibly setting him up for blackmail. But such pre-inauguration meetings with Russian diplomats have been a “common practice” according to Jack Matlock, the U.S. ambassador to Russia under Reagan and Bush, and Matlock had personally arranged such a meeting for Jimmy Carter.21 Obama’s own Russia adviser, Michael McFaul, admitted visiting Moscow for talks with officials in 2008 even before the election. Daniel Lazare makes a good case that not only are the illegality and blackmail threat implausible, but that the FBI’s interrogation of Flynn also reeks of entrapment. And he asks what is wrong with trying to reduce tensions with Russia? “Yet anti-Trump liberals are trying to convince the public that it’s all ‘worse than Watergate’.”22 So the political point of the Assessment seems to have been, at minimum, to tie the Trump administration’s hands in its dealings with Russia. Some non-MSM analysts have argued that we may have been witnessing an incipient spy or palace coup, that fell short but still had the desired effect of weakening the new administration.23 The Times has not offered a word of criticism of this politicization and intervention in the election process by the intelligence agencies, and in fact the editors have been working with them and the Democratic Party as a loosely-knit team in a distinctly un- and anti-democratic program designed to reverse the results of the 2016 election, while using an alleged foreign electoral intervention as their excuse. The Times and MSM in general have also barely mentioned the awkward fact that the allegedly Russian-hacked disclosures of the DNC and Clinton and Podesta e-mails described uncontested facts about real electoral manipulations on behalf of the Clinton campaign that the public had a right to know and that might well have affected election results. The focus on the evidence-free claims of a Russian hacking intrusion helped divert attention from the real electoral abuses disclosed by the WikiLeaks material. So here again, official and MSM fake news helped bury real news! Another arrow in the campaign quiver labeling Trump a knowing or “useful fool” instrument of Putin was a private intelligence “dossier” written by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence agent working for Orbis Business Intelligence, a private firm hired by the DNC to dig up dirt on Trump. Steele’s first report, delivered in June 2016, made numerous serious accusations against Trump, most notably that Trump had been caught in a sexual escapade in Moscow, that his political advance had been supported by the Kremlin for at least five years, under the direction of Putin, and with the further aims of sowing discord within the U.S. and disrupting the Western alliance. This document was based on alleged conversations by Steele with distant (Russian) officials; that is, strictly hearsay evidence, whose assertions, where verifiable, are sometimes erroneous.24 But it said just what the Democrats, MSM and CIA wanted said, so intelligence officials declared the author “credible” and the media lapped this up, with the Times covering over its own cooperation in this ugly denigration effort by calling the report “unverified” but nevertheless reporting its claims.25 The Steele dossier also became a central part of the investigation and hearings on “Russia-gate” held by the House Intelligence Committee starting in March 2017, led by Democratic Representative Adam Schiff. While basing his opening statement on the hearsay-laden dossier, Schiff expressed no interest in establishing who funded the Steele effort (he produced 17 individual reports), the identity and exact status of the Russian officials who were the hearsay sources, and how much they were paid. Apparently talking to Russians with a design of influencing a U.S. presidential election is perfectly acceptable if the candidate supported by this Russian intrusion is anti-Russian! The Times has played a major role in this Russophobia-enhancement process, reminiscent of its 1917-1920 performance in which, as noted back in 1920 “boundless credulity, and an untiring readiness to be gulled” characterized the news-making process. While quoting the CIA’s admission that they were showing no hard evidence, but were relying on “circumstantial evidence” and “capabilities,” the Times was happy to spell these capabilities out at great length and imply that they proved something.26 Editorials and news articles have worked uniformly on the supposition that Russian hacking was proved, which it was not, and that the Russians had given these data to WikiLeaks, also unproven and strenuously denied by Assange and Murray. So these reiterated claims are arguably first class “fake news” swallowed as palatable facts. The Times has run neck-and-neck with the Washington Post in stirring up fears of the Russian information war and improper involvement with Trump. The Times now easily conflates fake news with any criticism of established institutions, as in Mark Scott and Melissa Eddy’s “Europe Combats a New Foe of Political Stability: Fake News,” February 20, 2017.27 But what is more extraordinary is the uniformity with which the paper’s regular columnists accept as a given the CIA’s Assessment of the Russian hacking and transmission to WikiLeaks, the possibility or likelihood that Trump is a Putin puppet, and the urgent need of a congressional and “non-partisan” investigation of these claims. This swallowing of a new war-party line has extended widely in the liberal media (e.g., Bill Moyers, Robert Reich, Ryan Lizza, Joan Walsh, Rachel Maddow, Katha Pollitt, Joshua Holland, the AlterNet web site, etc.). Both the Times and Washington Post have given tacit support to the idea that this “fake news” threat needs to be curbed, possibly by some form of voluntary media-organized censorship or government intervention that would at least expose the fakery. The Times has treated uncritically the Schiff hearings on dealing with Russian propaganda, and its opinion column by Louise Mensch strongly supports government hearings to expose Russian propaganda. Mensch names 26 individuals who should be interrogated about their contacts with Russians, and she supplies questions they should be asked. The most remarkable media episode in this anti-influence-campaign campaign was the Washington Post‘s piece by Craig Timberg, “Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say” (November 24, 2016). The article features a report by an anonymous author or authors, PropOrNot, that claims to have found 200 web sites that wittingly or unwittingly, were “routine peddlers of Russian propaganda.” While smearing these web sites, the “experts” refused to identify themselves allegedly out of fear of being “targeted by legions of skilled hackers.” As Matt Taibbi says, “You want to blacklist hundreds of people, but you won’t put your name to your claims? Take a hike.”28 But the Post welcomed and featured this McCarthyite effort, which might well be a product of Pentagon or CIA information warfare. (And these entities are themselves well funded and heavily into the propaganda business.) On December 23, 2016 President Obama signed the Portman-Murphy “Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act,” which will supposedly allow this country to more effectively combat foreign (Russian, Chinese) propaganda and disinformation. It will encourage more government counter-propaganda efforts (which will, by patriotic definition, not be U.S. propaganda) and provide funding to non-government entities that will help in this enterprise. It is clearly a follow-on to the claims of Russian hacking and propaganda, and shares the spirit of the listing of 200 knowing or “useful fools” of Moscow featured in the Washington Post. Perhaps PropOrNot will qualify for a subsidy and be able to enlarge its list of 200. Liberals have been quiet on this new threat to freedom of speech, undoubtedly influenced by their fears of Russian-based fake news and propaganda. But they may wake up, even if belatedly, when Trump or one of his successors puts it to work on their own notions of fake news and propaganda. The success of the war party’s campaign to contain or overthrow any tendencies of Trump to ease tensions with Russia was dramatically clear in the Trump administration’s speedy bombing response to the April 4, 2017 Syrian chemical weapons deaths. The Times and other MSM editors and journalists greeted this aggressive move with almost uniform enthusiasm,29 and once again did not require evidence of Assad’s guilt beyond their government’s say-so. The action was damaging to Assad and Russia, but served the rebels well. But the MSM never ask cui bono? in cases like this. In 2003 a similar charge against Assad, which brought the U.S. to the brink of a full-scale bombing war in Syria, turned out to be a false flag operation, and some potent authorities believe the current case is equally problematic.30 But Trump moved quickly (and unlawfully) and any further rapproachement between this country and Russia was set back. The CIA, Pentagon, liberal-Democrats and rest of the war party had won an important skirmish in the struggle for and against permanent war. * First published in Monthly Review, July-August 2017. * Manufacturing Consent (New York: Pantheon, 1988, 2002, 2008), chap. 2. * Walter Lippmann and Charles Merz, A Test of the News (New York: New Republic, 1920). * On the Grand Area framework, see Noam Chomsky, “Lecture one, The New Framework of Order,” On Power And Ideology: The Managua Lectures (Boston, South End Press, 1987). * Edward Herman, “Returning Guatemala to the Fold,” in Gary Rawnsley, ed., Cold War Propaganda in the 1950s (London, Macmillan, 1999). * Ronald Schneider, Communism in Guatemala, 1944-1954 (New York: Praeger, 1959), 41, 196-7, 294. * “The Guatemala Incident,” New York Times (ed., April 8, 1950). * Harrison Salisbury, Without Fear or Favor (New York: Times Books, 1980), 486. * Richard DuBoff and Edward Herman, America’s Vietnam Policy: The Strategy of Deception (Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1966). * See Manufacturing Consent, chap. 6 (Vietnam). * Edward S. Herman and David Peterson, “The Dismantling of Yugoslavia,” Monthly Review, October 2007; Herman and Peterson, “Marlise Simons on the Yugoslavia Tribunal: A Study in Total Propaganda Service,” ZNet, April 16, 2005. * Stephen F. Cohen, Failed Crusade: America and the Tragedy of Post-Communist Russia (New York: W.W. Norton, 2000). * Robert Parry, “Troubling Gaps in the New MH-17 Report,” Consortiumnews.com. September 28, 2016. * Paul Krugman says “Mr. Putin is someone who doesn’t worry about little things like international law,” in “The Siberian Candidate,” New York Times, July 22, 2016. The fake news implication is that U.S. leaders do worry about it. * A version of Mearsheimer’s article “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault,” published in Foreign Affairs, Sept. 10, 2014, was offered to the Times but not accepted. Stephen Cohen’s 2012 article “The Demonization of Putin” was also rejected by the paper. * “Sochi Under Siege,” New York Times, February 21, 2014. * Michael Kimmelman, “Aleppo’s F aces Beckon to Us, To Little Avail,” New York Times,, Dec. 15, 2016. Above this front page article are four photos of dead or injured children, the most prominent one in Syria. The accompanying editorial: “Aleppo’s Destroyers: Assad, Putin, Iran,” December. 15, 2016, omits some key actors and killers. * Rick Sterling, “How US Propaganda Plays in Syrian War,” Consortiumnews.com, September. 23, 2016. * William Binney and Ray McGovern, “The Dubious Case on Russian ‘Hacking’,” Consortiumnews.com January 6, 2017. * David Sanger, “Putin Ordered ‘Influence Campaign’ Aimed at U.S. Election, Report Says,” NYT, January 6, 4017. * Nathan Robinson and Alex Nichols, “What Constitutes Reasonable Mainstream Opinion,” Current Affairs, March 22, 2017. * “Contacts With Russian Embassy,” JackAMatlock.com, March 4, 2017. * Daniel Lazare, “Democrats, Liberals, Catch McCarthyistic Fever,” Consortiumnew.com, February 17, 2917. * Robert Parry, “A Spy Coup in America?,” Consortiumnews,com, Dec. 18, 2016; Andre Damon, “Democratic Party Floats Proposal for a Palace Coup,” Information Clearing House, March 23, 2017. * Robert Parry, “The Sleazy Origins of Russia-gate,” Consortiumnews.com, March 29, 2017. * Scott Shane et al, “How a Sensational, Unverified Dossier Became a Crisis for Donald Trump,” New York Times, January 11, 2017. * Matt Fegenheimer and Scott Shane,” “Bipartisan Voices Back U.S. Agencies On Russia Hacking,” NYT, January 6, 2017; Michael Shear and David Sanger, “Putin Led a Complex Cyberattack Scheme to Aid Trump, Report Finds,“ NYT January 7, 2017; Andrew Kramer, “How the Kremlin Recruited an Army of Specialists to Wage Its Cyberwar,” NYT, Dec. 30, 2016. * Robert Parry, “NYT’s Fake News about Fake News,”Consortium news.com, February 22, 2017. * Matt Taibbi, “The ‘Washington Post’ ‘Blacklist’ Story Is Shameful and Disgusting,” Rolling Stone.com, November 28, 2016. * Adam Johnson, “Out of 47 Media Editorials on Trump’s Syria Strikes, Only One Opposed,” Fair, April 11, 2017. * Scott Ritter, “Wag the Dog—How Al Qaeda Played Donald Trump And The American Media: Responsibility for the chemical event in Khan Sheikhoun is still very much in question,” Huffingtonpost.com, April 9, 2017; James Carden, ”The Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria; Is there a place for skepticism?,” Nation, April 11, 2017. http://clubof.info/
0 notes
Text
Juan José Guatemalan President And Reformer Arévalo Essay
Juan José Guatemalan President And Reformer Arévalo Essay
From 1944 to 1954 Guatemala experienced an unprecedented democratic opening that began with the overthrow of the 13-year dictatorship of Jorge Ubico (1931–44) and ended with a coup d’état against president Jacobo Arbenz (1951–54), orchestrated by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)....
Read more on http://www.essayempire.com/examples/history/juan-jose-guatemalan-president-reformer-arevalo-essay/
0 notes
Text
Nuestra Expresión
Estamos en un año electoral y aunque a algunos les parezca tedioso el clima de las campañas, debemos mirar el proceso electoral como la ocasión para plantear un debate que permita exigir compromisos claros por parte de quienes son candidatos, y a las elecciones como una oportunidad para ratificar o cambiar el rumbo en el que marchan el país, la provincia y nuestra ciudad.
La elección legislativa que tendremos este año determinará la composición del Congreso Nacional para los dos próximos años y con ello habremos elegido a quienes tendrán en sus manos la responsabilidad de llevar adelante iniciativas que influirán en la calidad de vida de todos los habitantes de nuestra región y país. Por eso es importante la participación de todos, no soló el día de la elección, sino también debatiendo propuestas respecto de los temas que nos preocupan.
El Movimiento Evita encabeza lista local para pre candidatos a Concejales y Consejeros Escolares. Nuestra organización basa su desarrollo en el trabajo territorial, siempre con el sector más humilde y trabajador luchando por mejorar las condiciones de vida de nuestros vecinos con el solo objetivo de construir una patria mas justa y soberana.
En cuanto a este momento electoral, como fuerza territorial con espacios comunitarios en los que día a día concurren mas de 300 niños a tomar merienda o comidas, donde se realizan talleres y capacitaciones de diversas formas de trabajo, donde participan activamente mas de 70 mujeres y hombres mayores que creen en la organización como forma principal de lucha y cambio, hemos decidido ademas hacer que todo ese trabajo y acción se transforme en lucha política para también discutir e integrar las instituciones y llenarlas de las demandas genuinas del pueblo. De esta manera como Movimiento Evita venimos desde hace meses desarrollando la campaña de Randazzo como candidato y expresión de nuestro espacio político.
CONCEJALES TITULARES:
ROMINA RAMALLO DUARTE
DAMIAN CALANDRONI
MARIA ISABEL ARANDA
DARIO ANGEL YÑIGUEZ
FLORENCIA MOREL
JUAN TOMAS AREVALO
NANCI YÑYGUEZ
CONCEJALES SUPLENTES:
JUAN JOSE LOPEZ
CAROLINA LUCENA
FELICIANO QUINTANA
NELIDA RUIZ
CONSEJEROS ESCOLARES:
YOANA DOMINGUEZ
MÁXIMO RAMALLO
MARIA LUJAN GOMEZ
CONSEJEROS ESCOLARES SUPLENTES:
ALBERTO ALEJANDRO AREVALO
MARIA ROSA GAITAN
OSVALDO DANIEL AQUINO
0 notes
Text
Matrimonios 1708-1709 (by/por linda v.)
https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-6RSK-XD?mode=g&cc=1874591&cat=29324
1708-1709 film 168360
001 168360
002 OAH 2645-2646 p1
003 SLATE
004 PRINCIPIO
005 Juan Saucedo & Bernarda de San Miguel /Saltillo *tree desc #7
011 Juan Baltazar & Maria Rodriguez /Compostela *tree desc #12
015 Juan Manuel Gutierrez & Gertrudes Ayllon /Jalostotitlan/Juchipila
022 Juan de Olivares & Josefa Nuno /Zapotlan *tree desc #23 /also see #33
024 Juan de la Torre & Geronima Navarro /Saltillo *tree desc #27
033 same as #22 Juan de Olivares & Josefa Nuno *tree desc #33
035 Juan Martin & Petrona Maria /Guadalajara/Sayula
038 Juan Damian & Catalina de los Angeles /Teocaltiche/Jalostotitlan
040 Juan de los Reyes & Teresa Maria Delgado /Sayula
045 Juan Antonio de Tames & Catarina Rodriguez /Monterrey *tree desc #45
050 Ignacio de los Santos de Charles Mireles & Petronila de Jaso /Monterrey
058 Juan de la Mancha & Juana de la Garza /Monterrey *tree desc #58
065 Jose Cantu & Gertrudes de la Garza /Monterrey
066 Diego Gonzalez Rubio & Rosa Francisca de Vargas /Jalostotitlan *tree desc #68
072 Antonio de Pedroza & Teresa Macias Valadez /Lagos *tree desc #72
082 Nicolas de Aldrete & Josefa de la Mora y Hermosillo /Cuquio/Tepatitlan *tree desc #86
090 Juan Aceves de Hermosillo & Polonia de Torres /Tepatitlan *tree desc #92
094 Felix de Acosta & Maria Landeros /Aguascalientes/Lagos *tree desc #94
102 CONTINUA EN EL ROLLO SIGUIENTE
103 MEXICO OAH ROLLO 2645 FIN
104 MEXICO OAH ROLLO 2646
105 SLATE
106 CONTINUA DEL ROLLO ANTERIOR
107 same as img #94 Felix de Acosta & Maria Landeros /Aguascalientes/Lagos
115 Sebastian de Haro y Cueba & Josefa de Avila y Ledesma /Compostela
118 Roque Jimenez & Josefa Maria Macias /Ameca/Ahualulco
131 Santiago de Arizpe & Juana de los Santos /Satillo *tree desc #131
138 Salvador de Gamboa & Maria Rosales /Monte Escovedo *tree desc #139
140 Sebastian del Rio & Maria de Montes /Saltillo
144 Francisco Gutierrez & Bernarda Sanchez /Saltilo *tree desc #145
150 Francisco Cantu & Josefa Manuela de la Garza /Monterrey *tree desc #150
155 Francisco de los Santos & Polonia Sanchez de Segovia /Sierra de Pinos
159 Francisco Marcos & Lorenza Clara /Cocula
162 Francisco Arias & Juana Garcia /Ahuacatlan
166 Francisco Javier Casillas & Antonia Francisca /Poncitlan/Zapotlan
170 Gregorio Basauri & Nicolasa Elizondo /Reinos de Castilla/Leon/Jalpa /also see img #184
182 Francisco Mellado & Juana de Salaises /Villa Purificacion
184 part of img #170 Gregorio Basauri & Nicolasa Elizondo
189 Geronimo de Ornelas Villasenor & Francisca Alonso de los Hinojos /Teocaltiche
195 Cristobal Flores & Josefa Zepeda /Saltillo *tree desc #195
203 Cristobal Rodriguez & Rosa Maria /Tizapan *tree desc #203
208 Andres Arias de Savedra & Josefa de Bascones /Tepic
212 Andres Correa & Magdalena de los Reyes /Mazapil
217 Juan Antonio Ponce de Leon & Teodora Garcia /Monclova
223 Juan de Arredondo & Maria de Ibarra /Saltillo *tree desc #223
229 Alonso Nunez de Haro & Juana Jimenez /Guadalajara/Mascota *also see img #280
242 Juan de Plaza & Maria Rosa /Jala
246 Lorenzo Mejia & Magdalena de Santillan /Nochistlan *tree desc #252
256 Jose de Ornelas & Maria Gonzalez de Ruvalcaba /Teocaltiche
263 Jose de Aguilera & Jualiana de Velasco /Zacatecas
267 Patricio Lopez & Magdalena de Aranda /Ahuacatlan
270 Martin Geronimo & Maria Magdalena /Jalpa
273 Diego Sebastian & Magdalena /Teocaltiche
276 Andres Lozano & Antonia Gongora /Monterrey *tree desc #276
280 same as img #229 Alonso Nunez de Haro & Juana Jimenez *tree image #289
335 Antonio Alvarez & Maria de Llamas /Jalostotitlan/Nochistlan
340 Antonio Jimenez & Maria de San Miguel /Saltillo *tree desc #343
346 Antonio de la Garza & Isabel Cavazos /Monterrey *tree desc #346
351 Antonio Ramirez & Petronila Flores /Jalostotitlan *also see #361
354 Diego de la Mancha & Luisa de la Garza /Monterrey *tree desc #354
361 same as img #351 Antonio Ramirez & Petronila Flores /Jalostotitlan
363 Luis de Ornelas & Matiana Ruiz /Teocaltiche *tree desc #367
374 Miguel de Herrera & Josefa Chrisostomo /Acaponeta
378 Diego Flores de Valdez & Juana de la Fuente /Saltillo *tree desc #378
385 Luis de Navarrete & Mariana Tellez de Grajeda /Autlan
390 Miguel Galarza & Magdalena Macias /Real de Santa Rosa *tree desc #394
397 Miguel de la Garza & Isabel de Uribe /Monterrey *tree desc #397
404 Lucas Hernandez & Teresa Maria Salaises /Tepic/Ahuatlan
407 Alonso de Avila & Lucrecia de la Cruz /Purificacion
417 Salvador Hernandez & Lorenza Torres /Guanajuato/Aguascalientes
421 Salvador Gonzalez & Josefa de a Pena /Cuyutlan/Compostela
427 Salvador Gutierrez & Catalina de Vargas Castaneda /San Cristobal de la Barranca
446 Jose Juan de Medina & Maria Magdalena /Guanajuato/Juchipila
451 Felipe Duran & Maria de Cuevas /Nochistlan//Tepatitlan
458 Nicolas Garcia & Juana Martinez /Lagos
461 Miguel Juarez & Josefa Gomez /Aguascalientes/Teocaltiche/Ameca
468 Pedro Sanchez & Pascuala /Jalostotitlan *continues on img #475
470 Nicolas Muniz de Velasco & Rosalia de la Cueva y Aiyon /Compostela
471 Nicolas Vazquez de Lara & Rosa Matilde Sainz de Santiago *1st page missing
475 continues from img #468 Pedro Sanchez & Pascuala /Jalostotitlan
477 part of img #471 Nicolas Vazquez de Lara & Rosa Matilde Sainz de Santiago *tree #477
479 Nicolas de Avalos (Davalos) Becerra & Maria Beltran de Ayala /Guadalajara
484 Jose Maria Orosco & Catalina Gonzalez /Teocaltiche/Nochistlan *tree desc #487
492 Juan Acevedo del Castillo & Maria de la Cruz /Michoacan/Ahuacatlan
493 Maria de la Encarnacion Garcia *suspension de matrimonio por problemas de juridiccion y
tributos /Jerez
508 Jacinto Munoz de Leon & Juana Duran /Panuco
512 Jose de la Cerda & Antonia de Arizmendi /Teocaltiche
524 Jose de los Santos & Ana Macias /Aguascalientes
529 Jose de Aramburu & Catarina de Islas /Nochistlan/Aguascalientes *tree desc #531
535 Jose Macario Tremino (Trevino) & Juana Caballero /Monterrey *tree desc #536
541 Jose Ramirez & Lorenza Hernandez /Moya *tree desc #546
553 Jose de los Santos & Antonia Rosales Ramirez /Nochistlan *tree desc #555
563 Antonio Romo de Vivar & Felipa de Cuevas /Asientos/San Luis Potosi
566 Nicolas Jose de Escamilla & Micaela de Lomelin y Renteria /Ciudad de Mexico/Jalostotitlan
570 Jose de los Reyes & Beatriz de Medina /Aguascalientes *tree desc #570
575 Manuel de Olague & Felipa de la Cueva /Jerez
582 Pedro Calvillo & Bernarda Flores /Aguascalientes/Jalpa *cont on img #585 & #588
583 Miguel de Vargas & Juana de Robles /Cajititlan
585 part of img #582 Pedro Calvillo & Bernarda Flores
586 Dionicio Sanchez & Juana Josefa /Nochistlan
587 Ignacio Ruiz de Esparza & Gertrudes Macias /Aguascalientes
588 continues from images #582 & 585 Pedro Calvillo & Bernarda Flores
589 Pedro Fernandes de Sayas & Teresa Rodriguez de Carbajal /Reinos de Castilla/Boca Leones
599 Santiago Gonzalez de Archundia & Juana Gutierrez Duron /Islahuaca/Aguascalientes
602 Juan de Osorio & Magdalena Flores Medrano /Juchipila
606 Francisco Juan & Francisca Antonia /Tonala/Coyula
611 Fracisco de Ibarra & Maria Carrera /Acaponeta/Tepic
618 Francisco Agustin & Juana Petrona /Tonala
623 Gregorio Marastigui & Tomasa de Guzman (Morales) /Caracas/Compostela
628 Geronimo de Ruvalcaba & Antonia de Salas /Aguascalientes/Teocaltiche
631 Bartolome Garcia & Juana Ruiz de Esparza /Aguascalientes
634 Bernardo Pascual (esclavo) & Dominga de la Cruz /Aguascalientes/San Luis Potosi
636 Bartolome Ruiz Bravo & Ana Zezati del Castillo /Cordova/Sacatecas
641 Cristobal Lopez & Nicolasa de Viches /Zacatecas
645 Jose de los Reyes & Beatriz de Medina /Aguascalientes
648 Sebastian de Quezada & Antonia Ornelas /Jalostotitlan *tree desc #650
654 Marcos Gonzalez Hidalgo & Tomasa Cantu /Monterrey *tree desc #654
660 Antonio Gonzalez & Juana Gonzalez /Amacueca
661 Manuel Gonzalez & Josefa de Villareal /Monterrey
663 continues from img #660 Antonio Gonzalez & Juana Gonzalez
666 Lorenzo Ramirez & Juana Perez /Aguascalientes/Jalostotitlan
669 Juan de Medrano & Maria Martinez de Lerma /Guadalajara/Acaponeta
673 Juan Lopez & Ana de Castaneda /Santa Cruz
679 Juan Lopez & Ana Carrillo /Guadalajara
683 Nicolas de Arevalo (Ruvalcaba) & Antonia Garcia de los Angeles /Cuquio
695 Pedro de Araiza & Magdalena de Salazar /Aguascalientes
707 Antonio Velarde Cosio & Merenciana de Reinoso /Juchipila/Lagos
709 Lorenzo de Padilla y Davila & Rosa Maria Alvarez
711 Nicolas Cervantes & Juana Francisca /Aguascalientes/Fresnillo
714 Maria Magdalena /Tonala *caso en tribunal
716 Lazaro Valdez & Jacinta de la Pena /Saltillo *tree desc #718
722 Antonio de la O & Magdalena de Lamas /Colotlan
723 CONTINUA EN EL ROLLO SIGUIENTE
724 MEXICO OAH ROLLO 2646 FIN
725 END OF ROLL
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
alwaysahiccupandastrid
This Is Berk.
lilliankain
Write, Pinterest, Sleep, Repeat
hello-eden
Eden
percexe
aauuugggjhh
brettcao-blog
林君的家