#like she could have pulled the internalized misogyny card and i would have been receptive because she would have been right

[sn0tcl0wn]

so the radfem blocked me but still has the post tagged as "male violence" after i explicitly stated i'm not a male and the fight was between two little girls over a decade ago. i get having an opinion against it because i was in the wrong but i was also in the fifth or sixth grade and was a full blown girl fighting another girl. as of right now and for the foreseeable future i am fully ~biologically female~ and the only things i plan on changing about my body are to prevent cancer, childbirth, and possibly getting a little more muscle but not a single one of those things or desire to do so makes me a man. which begs the question; how much of the "male violence" radfems "call out" on social media is actually just afab nb people and cis women who don't clearly present as such online talking about getting into fights with girls in their childhood and teens? idk man it really disgusts me as a feminist when they go out of their way to start arguments and debates against you under the impression you're a man, block you when it turns out you're not, and proceed to keep the narritive that you're an abusive man plastered on their blog without apologizing to you for making that accusation. as someone who was abused by men their entire life, survived horrific domestic violence, and experiences misogyny and various forms of sexual harassment almost daily, i cannot believe these women think they advocate for people like me.