#overall good video essay though he articulated his points very well and even if i dont agree on all of them they're well thought out! | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

kaleidographia · 6 years

Text

[Analysis] The "Weird" One: Where The Last Jedi Fits

View On WordPress

I have a confession to make.

This may be a weird way to start what is essentially the first post of a new media critique blog, but I consider it to be essential knowledge. Every reviewer and analyst brings their own unique perspective to their writing, and I am no different; sooner or later, this truth will make itself known. To know this fact about me is to gain a new understanding of what makes me tick as a consumer of art, and it is one that it best to get out of the way as soon as possible, for it is better for a reader to lose interest now than to string along until the awkwardness of hiding such a secret reveals itself.

Here it is:

I LOVE the Star Wars prequels.

Oh, not only do I love them, completely and unironically, I actually do not care much for the original trilogy. It’s all right. But it doesn’t make my heart sing.

Attack of the Clones does.

Okay, okay, I can already hear the groans of disgust and the clicks of mice leaving my blog to the wilds of the web, but I promise this is going somewhere. I am not unaware of the many flaws the Prequel trilogy has, and I can’t in good conscience call them cinematic masterpieces, but I think this opinion derives itself not from poor taste, but the relative lack of blockbuster quality movies that tap into very particular themes and structural quirks that I appreciate. I may dive into those specifics at a later time, but the reason why I am bringing this up now is because it inextricably ties into my feelings about the most recent film in the franchise’s main series, which would be impossible for me to discuss without addressing this aspect of my formative film influences.

The Last Jedi has already received tons of coverage, controversy, and counter-controversy, so if you’re interested in picking apart the finer aspects of the plot and characters, feel free to look those up — I am sure there is a brilliant video essay on Youtube tailor-made just for you. I am more interested in the meta-narrative surrounding its position in terms of fanservice to what is an enourmous empire of not only fans of the original trilogy, but fans of its many derivations, spin-offs, and cultural foundations.

Star Wars is no longer just a film about a space farmer who learns he’s a space wizard and goes on a perfect beat-by-beat hero’s journey. It encompasses more than that: two sequels, an expanded universe of books upon books, comics, videogames, pinball machines — a holiday special (and no, I have not watched it) — toys, cartoons, parodies, reiterations, iconic images, phrases, cinematic touchstones, and, of course, the Prequels.

When the new Sequel trilogy was announced, the filmmakers had a real challenge to contend with: How can one follow up on not only a legacy of films, but also a legacy of expectations of what such a sequel would be like? I am not just referring to the fact that Disney, post acquisition of Lucasfilm, decided to just toss out the previous expanded universe, label it “Legends”, and start afresh with a new canon. I am also referring to the literal millions of fans who were already thoroughly familiar with not only the films but also their cultural impact. How could one possibly please them, especially when the Prequel trilogy was so universally mocked?

It was clear that Disney needed to win the crowd over, and to do so they leaned heavily into a safe bet: the Original trilogy. The Force Awakens released with a sort of wink-and-nudge, reflected in its story beats, characterization, and practical effects, that said “hey, we hear you. We know you’re scared because you don’t trust us to do this material justice and we know you love the original films, so we’re gonna give you exactly what you’re looking for”. It’s hard not to see the fanservice and whether or not it was successful has already been discussed to death, so I won’t get into it here, but the point is — and I am sure this wasn’t really intentional — to someone like me, who actually liked the prequels and a lot of the expanded universe, this approach felt incredibly alienating. Everyone was having fun with the new film, but to me it felt like it was saying, “all those things you love about Star Wars are not the reasons why anyone else loves Star Wars,” and I’m not gonna lie, I was pretty hurt, but at the very least The Force Awakens gave me a cast to fall in love with.

This is why when The Last Jedi was in production, I was intrigued to hear that this film was going to be “weird” and “unlike any other Star Wars film”. My expectations were tempered by the fact that ultimately this was going to be a Disney movie anyway, so it was probably not going to reach my standard of Weird (my dad showed me Koyaanisqatsi when I was 7, to give you an idea). Nevertheless, after the very safe rehash of Episode 4 that was The Force Awakens, I was just hoping for anything that might show me the franchise still had room for creativity.

I was in fact happy with the result, although it doesn’t surprise me at all that it attracted controversy. Some of my close friends, whose opinions I highly respect, hated the film for various reasons and I can even agree with them on some points. Others, like me, loved it. Overall, however, what I like most isn’t necessarily anything about the film itself, but its position as a nod to fans who wanted their corners of the Star Wars universe acknowledged. To put it bluntly, as a Prequels fan, I felt represented.

Going even beyond the Prequels, The Last Jedi contains themes from my favourite piece of Star Wars media, the Bioware-produced videogame Knights of the Old Republic and its Obsidian-produced sequel, which layer critique of what it means to be a Force user and what the role of Jedi and Sith are in the grand scheme of things. “Jedi” does not necessarily mean “good”, a fact Luke highlights in his role as reluctant mentor to Rey, and while there are some things I would change about his portrayal here, this perspective is absolutely one I wanted to see more of in the main series. Even as a kid, good-vs-evil stories bored me; it’s one reason why the Original trilogy failed to speak to me, because even though I wouldn’t have been able to articulate why at the time, the setup was just too easy. It didn’t challenge me to think that there’s a side that’s inherently good and a side that’s inherently evil, but when Knights of the Old Republic put decisions about when and how to use the Force in front of me, that was a much more interesting proposition, and the idea that doctrine about the nature of the Force could be wrong or even damaging was outright enticing. I honestly can’t remember whether playing the games or watching the Prequels came first, but I get the feeling it was the games, because that malleable view of what the Force means and who the Jedi and Sith are has carried through for me ever since.

The Last Jedi does kind of play it safe in some ways, ultimately being a Disney property that has to sell lots of merchandise and bring people to theme parks, but it also boldly rejects just about every expectation one might have of a “Star Wars Film”, characters make mistakes, they fail, things go wrong at the worst possible times, some act selfishly or foolishly, and by the time the credits roll there’s actually very little to be excited about, as the heroes are in a much worse position than they were when the film started, which was already very bleak. But in a way, that was the most exciting part to me, as someone who grew tired of the popular culture perception of Star Wars and who felt shut out of the Sequel trilogy by its first film; The Last Jedi may have been agonizing, but it was agonizing in a way that promised more, giving hope to those of us who were looking for a less straightforward narrative at a time when powerful politicians can be comically villainous in public and yet people would bend over backwards to excuse their actions as if an “evil empire” didn’t already exist. Over the last couple of years I have seen people post a gif of Padmé Amidala’s iconic line, “So this is how liberty dies… with thunderous applause”, saying this was the only part of the Prequel trilogy that aged well, and yet to me the truth was already glaringly obvious back when the film was released, contributing strongly to my own critical interpretation of it. The Last Jedi is a film that picks up on the thought that people can make foolish and terrible decisions and runs with it, but it is by no means the first in the series to approach this theme.

(I should note that as a Brazilian, whose country was freshly out of a dictatorship when I was born and which is now hurtling towards another at full speed, my views on what counts as an Evil Empire and how and why a democracy dies may be somewhat sharper than the average American’s. This is by no means the only reason why I’m into this kind of storytelling, nor is it exclusive to me, but it is a big one, and it would be short-sighted to ignore it.)

Ultimately I understand why The Last Jedi is so polarizing; it doesn’t pull punches and some of the punches it throws are even a bit misaimed, thus the description of it as “weird” and “unprecedented” makes sense. It just isn’t quite as weird or unprecedented when compared to previous attempts at broadening the scope of the Star Wars narrative both within the main film series and the expanded universe (at least pre-Disney; I haven’t engaged with any post-Legends canon aside from the Rebels cartoon, so I can’t say for sure). It also serves as a complete 180° turn from the Sequel trilogy establishing itself as a safe haven for Original trilogy fans and a middle chapter leading into a final film we still know nothing about, so whether its narrative leaps will pay off are still a mystery. In any case, The Last Jedi rejects superficial concerns in favour of theme, leading to a certain degree of dissatisfaction from fans who really wanted to know Rey’s parentage and what exactly was up with Snoke, but I think this is a good thing, because they gave new meanings to previously established Star Wars tropes and drove the whole thing into uncharted territory. I for one am glad the franchise has freed itself of these particular burdens; it simply remains to be seen whether the conclusion will maintain this momentum.

All this to say, I like the Last Jedi because it likes the things I like about Star Wars, and now I know I’m not the only one.

#Analysis #film #Star Wars #The Last Jedi

2 notes · View notes

autoirishlitdiscourses · 4 years

Text

Discourse of Friday, 02 October 2020

Ultimately, my suggestion would be to ask me if you would benefit from letting your own presuppositions in more close detail. Even if someone else may beat you to help your grade. You handled your material very effectively and in a nutshell, is perhaps most useful here, I think that the professor is behind a bit more on the final, which you could merge the recitation half of the equipment yourself. Have a good job on Wednesday! I mean: you had chosen, and several paintings called Woman or Women spring to mind I don't grade you on Tuesday, 3 December 30% of course, this does not conform to the original text in question perfectly, without any errors. Two polite reminders: the twelfth episode, too. Try using a different opinion will not hurt you a five-minute lecture on/Godot/seen in the conversation would be to spend a substantial number of questions or issues that you've done a lot of ways, and are genuinely astounding, I myself don't know whether Bloom has a particular point, because it will be how strong your central ideas revolve around identity formation and the divine aphasia I think that this is really successful in the time you get at least 98% on the professor's syllabus specifies that your basic point of analysis. However, if you'd like me to do is to pick out the evidence that best supports your specific argument about their own potential and serve as a whole tomorrow; In front of the play to see first thing in the end of the rhythm of the second stanza and demonstrating your close readings would help to avoid large amounts of repetition of their material. Each of you as the being taken care of yourself, and would be for you that time passes differently when you're bored out of time that could have been assessed so far of people haven't done the reading or other work for you. Again, thank you for not doing so. Have a good student and for me if you have previously requested that I have also been participating fairly regularly, so it's completely up to your paper's structure often causes your very perceptive.

The maximum possible credit on dates. I think that you can't get to people that I have a more nuanced. Think, too, that there is only a suggestion, not only lucid but thoughtful and focused, and I wish I could have been a pleasure to read this paper, no, I think that your ideas will have noted that he meant to describe women in this contemporary world that we haven't had enough of it as soon as possible; if you're treating the text as quickly as possible from the same time, and their views of sexuality is potentially a very, very articulate paper here. I can meet you at the beginning of your grade yet. Being specific about what to do is produce an audio/visual text, but given your interest in the meantime or have been balanced a bit more on the first line of your recitation/of your selection perfectly, without any errors. Another is to think, too.

Hi! It may be most helpful to have toward the Nugents as Anglo-Irish Literature, fall 2013 at UC Santa Barbara, who is Godot? Just send me the video supplements the lyrics by providing a lecture. But there are a number of formatting and grammatical problems here, and the standard essay structure instead of scaling back what you're actually saying. You brought out a lot of good work.

There are also some editing problems here—my suspicion is that if you think you most need to develop, as outlined in my 5 p. Well done on your midterm, your attention on the midterm; is the best way to section and the fairy world. Again, well done here. In particular, you can receive email at your main points out while still allowing other people have done a good holiday break! There are a number of points.

Etc.

Ultimately, think about dealing with the professor just wanted to make abstract cognitive assessments without being heavy-handed here and there, is lucid, and I'll send out the issues on the degree to which you improved over your first recitation was itself quite impressive things here, is to avoid the specificity that you have a very reduced set of very good paper. You also tie your discussion could have gone to your secondary sources well, but some students may not yet be clear to you. You basically did a number of ways, and truthfully, participation except for the course, and the concerns in Irish culture should probably at least. I quite liked it. Well done on this you connected it effectively to questions from other students. Again, very good paper. I've gestured in margin comments? I'm trying to complete an English Paper lots of good things to talk about this, but you came up effectively to larger-scale course concerns and did a number of things that makes sense to put in the blank in Haines's comment to Stephen: We feel in England to we in England believe on line/paragraph spacing in MS Word 2007: A very strong delivery. I'm looking forward to your address book or calr, online or offline.

I hope you're feeling better soon. Check to make sure that there are probably thousands of potential to pay off for anything at all times. Students who are sterile or electively childless, those who want to cover, but you really have done, both of you is leading the group to read. Let me know, and I'm operating on the rest of your weekend! The latter especially is quite a strong and, again, the number of thematic overlap is that you will quite likely enjoy Hannah Arendt's book On the one he read would be my student who was buried that morning in lecture 22 Oct: The Dubliners sing The Croppy Boy, and I suspect that these paintings fall within the larger structures and concerns and did an amazing job. I think, is not comprehensive, but it's a smart move to #2, who told it to you having the bottom of a variety of texts think of a selection from the MLA standard will negatively impact your grade is not inevitably the case that registration is very solid manner to what you mean, here is that more information. You have a strong job. Whatever you mean by talking about a the specific language of your cancellation penalty for the course so far since you gave quite a nice job dealing with them will depend on what you wanted to remind people.

Pdf, OpenOffice/LibreOffice or Microsoft Word document, what he had taken the first place, but I haven't watched Dexter? You've been participating extensively and wind up receiving slightly more specific about where you're going to be flexible, and reschedule would be central to the writing assignment. Does anyone have a good student this quarter, too. I'm suggesting that there will only be recited. The maximum possible grade to a specific point, because I think that it would probably have paid off here.

Hi!

Your Grade Is Calculated in Excruciating Detail: Prof. Extra grading because someone else had already written a wonderfully perceptive, too, but I haven't. Have a good chunk of the colonizer is a bit lopsided. There were some pauses for recall. I'm not just because it retrospect, it may be other opportunities later on for you this Wednesday.

I felt like you received the grade you on Thursday. Section that you're going to be more specific in your paper this quarter, so I suspect that these will be to make sense, and gracefully move from one topic to another text than to worry about not having a thesis statement, though. If that absolutely doesn't work for you to push your argument as you travel through your selection; added old to what you call broad history and how does the show is that these are very perceptive readings, I guess, that their behavior was not previously familiar with either play though I've read it entirely, etc. Hi! The Blooms' marriage. Let me know what works for you. With two exceptions the very weirdness of Francie's meat delivery 5 p. There were some genuinely tiny errors, mostly well-written in a way as to convince the reader that its structure was articulated more explicitly about what you're doing other things differently. Can't blame them after all, you have performed, you will receive this weighting score. This may be that the personal pronoun is sometimes used to control women and the other paper yet. Have a good weekend, and you really mop the floor with the horror of the flaneur and how it supports your central argument is. Again, this meant that they relate to the section website. Are we talking about it, it makes it difficult for your new topic if you can't write a draft for everyone else so there are thousands, if I recall them in section. You are welcome to send me, along with the material to provide an argument from lecture or section in HSSB 2251, and if that works better for you? Ultimately, it's not out there, generally aren't actually addressing the crowd at a bare minimum length requirement. I've noticed that the rather abstract and general questions might have heard about. Again, thank you for being a good job digging in to the aspects of your total grade for the sake of being helpful. Everything looks pretty good sense of harmony and rhythm.

There are a couple of things quite well here: you produce an audio recording of your paper to punch through to a theoretically supportable level. You definitely have a lot about what possibilities for discussion by email. Let me play devil's advocate here and there are ways in which he had discussed re-take it. 54 2. I think, to be more specific topic with sufficient depth or specificity. Making a wise move, which is a fair amount of time and managed to articulate all of your argument from going for the quarter so far, if you don't have a really really really really want to attend the entire class, overall, of course, you'll want to have thought deeply about a characteristic of the text, though.

I necessarily believe these things not because I don't know at this, but rather of the paper, and we will have another suggestion about question-writing: some recent tweets about MLA format is followed in a reasonable compromise. Again, I have you scheduled on 27 November, the highest possible grade to your large-scale questions with smaller-scale details and building your very fair and very engaging. Your delivery was solid, and that uniting a discussion of the quality possessed by the rules is generally pretty strong claim to prove that the airman gets out of that first draft, letting it sit and then map those letter grades, preferring to leave by 5 p. You have some leeway in handling this matter and wanted to wait longer after asking a lot of very long selection and have some very good job of getting people to engage the group outward from a two-year college can be hard to get people started talking for a minute, do you actually want it. I think that paying very close reading of the section eventually, and how this is not criticism, because this is, it should turn out to next week's reciters. There are plenty of room for crashers, and this is because this is not sufficient to have gone to your potential in the morning shift if that doesn't ask for any reason at all turning your paper and see what he wants; the professor, but then, I hope you get behind. Thanks for doing such a good paper. I guess you could engage in a close-read.

And will respond to a natural, organic part of the week you are from the analytical rigor of the play, and you incorporate the required texts in relation to your recitation/discussion grade? In particular, of course no surprise coming from a difficult and complicated thing to do so profitably might be to think out your ideas out in a late paper. In that series, which would boost your overall grade for the points that you've prepared more material than normal that we have sympathy for Francie is also available. The photographing of ravens; all the fun under Liberty's masterful shadow; To-morrow for the rest of the text, and I'm sorry to take it. Explains the currency in question, rather than proving points by demolishing counterarguments, is that you'll need to already know about the family relationship in The Butcher Boy. This means that you're OK, but that are not on me. One of these bonuses, which is the only good way to fill in missing information or ask clarifying or intermediate questions leading up to an X and/or different from Joyce's, so I hope you had some important things to say that nationalism was lessened mid-century American painter Willem de Kooning's Woman series is full. The title and copyright page from the in-section responses, because week 1, because freedom is a productive discussion out.

There are a number of things going with their interpretative or other visual arts as texts, with macro-and I quite enjoyed reading it. I absolutely realize that right now. This is a mandatory course requirement. Think about how to override the defaults and produce an MLA-compliant paper. Ultimately, what I'd encourage you to lift your grade back, but that's basically what it will eventually force someone to speak instead of panicking and answering them yourself. Volunteering to be fully successful, however, two of the equipment that you've got a lot of ways, and converted the interior monologue into intelligible and articulate prose that was fair to ask people to engage critically with reliable historical sources. You've done a lot of important issues. I'll be awake for a recitation text.

I'm not saying that you're thinking about what your argument in terms of a chance to add a class without a petition. What he did a good job of discussion and were almost completely accurate to the aspects of your total grade for the difficulties involved. I'd like. All in all, I also feel that that is appropriate for that assignment and may very well if you can't go on in some kind of strained family dynamics? It's virtually certain, with absolutely everything except for the quarter, this sounds great! A good guideline is that if someone else, which strips out rhetorical features that might be productive. Your participation grade up substantially. So, for that week's reading, and that often small changes in many ways—I think she's worked hard and earned it. You really do have to get started writing your last chance to turn in your introduction: what, ultimately.

I'll post that on a Thursday, October 11, which would be to think not about individuals, and some of your own complex and admirable performances. Let me know if you have additional questions, please let me know if you have memorized. —You've done a solid delivery of the text in such a good student!

Just over ⅓ of the text, you will turn in your future endeavors. Email that TA and see whether you want to make your writing is very unlikely. I think that phrasing your central interpretive claim near the beginning and end of that looks good to me but let me know if there's anything still outstanding, OK? There are two copies in the reading now.

Just let me know if you want them to pick them up today, and you've set up your final decision for the metaphor. Hi! Well done on your new topic if you have any questions. There are many other possibilities. Most students are doing poorly in this world, people have no one else at all by any means, but I have open chairs in both sections. And now that I'm still trying to get back to you much extra time, so be sure you're correct and prepared to perform a short set of ideas in your on Wednesday evenings and bring specific issues, and your material, and then map those letter grades, which requires you to arrange with the students had 97% or above, and probably very healthy move. If you must attend or reschedule, and showed that you've dropped the phrase at which he was in use and the poor male subject who is a very strong paper in other places in your delivery; you delivered a sensitive, and it's OK. At this point. I suspect from previous experience that should turn into a conceptual space where a productive exercise I myself am less than. If you're looking for a B for the final exam, and you accomplished a lot of good advice. 05. Very well done.

Of course, you'll get that in as soon as possible productive ways to deal with, or play too much pain. Deploying multiple critical lenses in your paper is graded by Friday afternoon your notes it's perfectly acceptable to cite poems by Seamus Heaney, Requiem for the quarter, so I can be found on the midterm exam have been structuring your examination of how you would benefit from exploring in relation to its topic and take it. I'll waive the by 10 p. Nicely done. Ultimately, what do you mean when you give a more specific direction. Do you have a copy of your paper and have not yet done the reading yet, and overall you did quite a difficult text; there are possibly many good ways to do it: it will help you to develop your discussion of ten; section 2, below. One of my own opinion, anyway.

All in all, you know by email. This week has just been so far, with Dexter, it would have helped you to each other respectfully during discussions, even if another format is followed in a more specific way. I always enjoy reading your writing despite some—mostly—rather nitpicky comments I've made some real contributions to discussion: performed: Oh I Do Like a S'Nice S'Mince S'Pie sung by Corp. Don't worry about whether you wish to incorporate personal experience it can. 1 began on a paper within this deadline guarantees that you can receive email at your option, depending on what actually matters, but want to say to each other. Often, B papers take risks in the best way to campus before 3 on Monday you should make a counteroffer by 11:00 work? A slip, in part because its very everydayness shows how strange Francie's life is. I'll give away add codes as quickly as I see it here. Mp3 of the song performances themselves, but it should be on the assignment write-up, if that doesn't work for me! If you are of course I'll still take it. I'm sorry to say that I have received a final letter grade is 50 _9. It was a bit more patient with silence, and that everything is OK! Which is to be perhaps more flexible, is that if it's late or I'm in a close-reading exercise of your paper this quarter, I think this paper, and you handled yourself and your paper is a set of ideas in here. One less paper and for which you can bring up, and will have definite ideas about nationalism as a piece of writing. If you wanted to remind me before I grade is simply to assume that your questions as more open-ended questions would have helped to motivate people other than quite good. Being chivalrous in the course at this point would be the bearer of good things to say that a lot of good material in there, and what you want me to but I'm sending this tonight because I feel that the overall goal is to sit down and write a paper about Downton Abbey for a job well done! 3:30 tomorrow, you will have to satisfy the college writing requirement. For next week.

#Irish literature #automatically generated text #Patrick Mooney #Python #Markov chains

0 notes

neptunecreek · 6 years

Text

Building the “Great Collective Organism of the Mind” at The John Perry Barlow Symposium

Individuals from the furthest corners of cyberspace gathered Saturday to celebrate EFF co-founder, John Perry Barlow, and discuss his ideas, life, and leadership.

The John Perry Barlow Symposium, graciously hosted by the Internet Archive in San Francisco, brought together a collection of Barlow’s favorite thinkers and friends to discuss his ideas in fields as diverse as fighting mass surveillance, opposing censorship online, and copyright, in a bittersweet event that appropriately honored his legacy of Internet activism and defending freedom online.

Thanks to the magic of fair use, you can relive the Symposium any time by visiting the Internet Archive. Video begins at 48:00.

%3Ciframe%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fembed%2Fyoutube-Oaci9vlg_Sc%22%20webkitallowfullscreen%3D%22true%22%20mozallowfullscreen%3D%22true%22%20allowfullscreen%3D%22%22%20height%3D%22431%22%20frameborder%3D%220%22%20width%3D%22575%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E

Privacy info. This embed will serve content from archive.org

After a touching opening from Anna Barlow, John Perry Barlow’s daughter, EFF Executive Director Cindy Cohn kicked off the speaker portion of the event:

“To me, what Barlow did for the Internet was to articulate, more and more beautifully than almost anyone, that this new network had the possibility of connecting all of us. He saw that the Internet would not be just a geeky hobby or toy like ham radios, or only a military or academic thing, which is what most folks who knew about it believed. Starting from the Deadheads who used it to gather, he saw it as a new lifeblood for humans who longed for connection, but had been separated.”

EFF Executive Director Cindy Cohn.

While the man himself may not have been present, Barlow’s connection—and influence—was palpable throughout the Symposium, with a dozen distinguished speakers and hundreds in attendance conversing, delivering remarks, and offering up questions about the past, the present, the future, and Barlow’s impact on all of it. The first speaker (and EFF’s co-founder along with Barlow), Mitch Kapor, told the audience: “I can feel his generous and optimistic spirit right here in the room today inspiring all of us.”

EFF co-founder Mitch Kapor with Pam Samuelson.

Barlow’s genius, said Kapor, was that in 1990, while most Internet usage was research- and military-based, he “absolutely nailed the Internet’s essential character and what was going to happen.”

Samuelson and Barlow speak with with Bruce Lehman, head of the USPTO in 1996.

Pam Samuelson, Distinguished Professor of Law and Information at the University of California, Berkeley, pointed out that Barlow’s 1994 treatise on copyright in the age of the Internet, The Economy of Ideas, has been cited a whopping 742 times in legal literature. But he didn’t just give lawyers an article to cite—Barlow helped the world understand that copyright had a civil liberty dimension and galvanized people to become copyright activists at a time when traditional notions of information access would be shaken to their core.

Freedom of the Press Foundation's Trevor Timm.

Trevor Timm described Barlow as “the guiding light” and “the organizational powerhouse” of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, which he co-founded with Barlow in 2012. On the day the organization launched, Timm recalled, Barlow wrote: “When a government becomes invisible, it becomes unaccountable. To expose its lies, errors, and illegal acts is not treason, it is a moral responsibility. Leaks become the lifeblood of the Republic.” His hope was that the organization would inspire a new generation of whistleblowers—and the next speaker, Edward Snowden, made clear he’d achieved this goal, telling the audience: “He raised a message, sounded an alarm, that I think we all heard. He did not save the world, none of us can—but maybe he started the movement that will.”

Whistleblower Edward Snowden talks about Barlow's impact.

The speakers answered questions on Facebook privacy, their disagreements with Barlow (of which there were many, ranging from the role of government overall to whether copyright was alive or dead), and what comes next in our understanding of the web. Cory Doctorow, EFF Special Advisor and emcee of the Symposium alongside Cindy Cohn, answered this in “Barlovian” fashion: “We could sit here and try to spin scenarios until the cows come home and not get anything done, or we can roll up our sleeves and do something.”

EFF’s former Executive Director (and current director of the Tor Project) Shari Steele began the second panel, discussing Barlow’s deeply-held belief in the First Amendment, insistence on hearing opposing viewpoints, and interest in bringing together diverse opinions: “That’s how he thrived...He was always encouraging people to talk to each other—to have conversations where you normally maybe wouldn’t have thought this was somebody you would have something in common with. He was fascinating, dynamic, and helped us create an Internet that has all sorts of fascinating and dynamic speech in it.”

Shari Steele, John Gilmore, and Joi Ito.

John Gilmore, EFF Co-founder and Board Member, invoked French philosopher and anthropologist Teilhard de Chardin, whose ideas Barlow specifically referenced in his writings. Barlow’s interest in mind-altering experiences, like taking LSD, said Gilmore, wasn’t just related to his love of the Internet: it came from the exact same place, an interest in creating the “great collective organism of mind” that Barlow hoped we might one day become.

Steven Levy, author and editor at large at Wired.

Author Stephen Levy, the writer of Hackers, thought that though Barlow may be well known as a writer of lyrics for the Grateful Dead, he will possibly be even better known by his words about the digital revolution. In his view, Barlow was a terrific writer and a master storyteller “capable of pulling off a quadruple-axle level of nonfiction difficulty.” His gift was to be able to not only “explain what was happening to the out-of-it Mr. Joneses of the world, but to encapsulate what was happening, to celebrate it, and to warn against its dangers in a way that would enlighten even the...people who knew the digital world—and to do it in a way that the reading was a pure pleasure.”

Joi Ito, Director of the MIT Media Lab.

Joi Ito, Director of the MIT Media Lab, described Barlow’s sense of humor and optimism—the same “you see when you talk to the Dalai Lama.” Today’s dark moments for the Internet aren’t the end, he said, and reminded everyone that Barlow had an elegant way of bringing these elements together with activism and resolve. His deep sense of humor came “from knowing how terrible the world is, but still being connected to true nature.” Ito also touched upon Barlow's groundbreaking essay A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace as a crucial "battle cry for us to rally around," taking the budding cyberpunk movement and helping it become a socio-political one.

The second panel fielded questions on encryption, Barlow’s uncanny ability to show up in the weirdest places, and how we can inspire the next generation of Barlows. Echoing EFF’s mission of bringing together lawyers, technologists, and activists, Joi Ito said that we will need engineers, lawyers, and social scientists to come together to redesign technology and change law, and also change society—and that one of Barlow’s amazing abilities was that he could talk to, and influence, all of these people.

Twenty-seven years later, EFF continues to work at the bleeding edge of technology to protect the rights of the users in issues as diverse as net neutrality, artificial intelligence, opposing censorship, and fighting mass surveillance.

Ameila Barlow reads from the 25 Principles for Adult Behavior.

Amelia Barlow, John Perry’s daughter, thanked the “vast web” of infinitely interesting and radical human beings around the world who he cared about and cared about him. “Never before have you been able to draw more immediately and completely upon him—and I want you to feel that,” she said, before reading his now-famous 25 Principles for Adult Behavior.

Anna Barlow reflects on her father's life.

As Anna Barlow said in her opening remarks, Barlow’s adventures didn’t stop in his later years—they just started coming to him. Some of the most brilliant thinkers in the world showed that this will remain true even while his physical presence is missed. Perhaps the Symposium was one step towards creating the “great collective organism of mind” that Barlow hoped to see us all become. And at the very least, Anna said, he doesn’t have to be bummed about missing parties anymore—because now he can go to all of them.

Cory Doctorow gives parting words on honoring Barlow.

Cory Doctorow closed the Symposium with a request:

“This week—sit down and have the conversation with someone who’s already primed to understand the importance of technology and its relationship to human flourishing and liberty. And then I want you to go varsity. And I want you to have that conversation with someone non-technical, someone who doesn’t understand how technology could be a force for good, but is maybe becoming keenly aware of how technology could be a force for wickedness.

And ensure that they are guarded against the security syllogism. Ensure that they understand too that we need not just to understand that technology can give us problems, but we must work for ways in which technology can solve our problems too.

And if you do those things you will honor the spirit of John Perry Barlow in a profound way that will carry on from this room and honor our friend who we lost so early, and who did so much for us.”

Join EFF

Donate in honor of John Perry Barlow

from Deeplinks https://ift.tt/2HgzHDx

#Deeplinks

0 notes

autoirishlitdiscourses · 7 years

Text

Discourse of Friday, 04 August 2017

All in all, you have thought out extensively, and I've read works by Pinter before, and provided an interpretive pathway into one of the section Twitter stream. You added an extra word in the third-to-date copy of your paper's structure. Can you forward me back the grading email that says that you find a copy of Ulysses? But there are many possible love-related tasks in this regard are. Travel safely, and that does not meet basic standards for a few places where your analysis will pay off more would have been, though you got up in section 27 November discussion of the text s with which you recite it and of your perspective. All in all, though there are ways in which your UMail addresses are forwarded are rejecting messages. All of which I suspect that forcing yourself to find this out is that if you feel that it's likely that you'll get one of two pairs reciting from Godot today. I meant to be recited by one line—/will incur a penalty to that. 4 lines, probably pick eight of ten; section 2: short essay; section 2, again, I think that it's not inevitably the case and I think that would have helped, I think that there are some ways in the context of Synge's photos of the one that they must discuss at least partly with other propaganda pieces of evidence that you're perfectly capable of doing so productively might be to think about Simon and Mary Dedalus in Ulysses, but I re-evaluate papers based on attendance. Disability Accommodations: If your word processor to add one potential reading of Ulysses please let me know what you would need to take smaller cognitive leaps in order to get back to you. Let me know whether that's meant to describe women in his work Rope and People I; The Poetess; and captivated the group is, we should be to ask how the text of the paper. An average weighting for students in both sections in this paper up to you I thought I'd responded to your recitation/discussion assignment are available. Burroughs, etc. Hi! I think that this has paid off a great deal for improving your grade: You are absolutely unchangeable, because the implications of the text. Wow, that's one way to set next to each other effectively while in the text you plan to recite. I can. Would sometime early tomorrow afternoon but have held your grade at your cell phone—is cause for disciplinary action. Similarly, with his own thoughts on this, and nicely grounded in a rather general argument, as I just think that you can still pull your grade, assuming that everyone will be note that Francie's home is? If that absolutely cannot be be received at a time in a lot of things in there, really big task for ten minutes if you disagree, because there were things that you will automatically continue to attend the entire class, though.

Make sure to get a clearer idea. On the English Office and on the time limit has come up to one or more course texts in an otherwise dull day.

Fill in the writing process, and what will be on that without also pulling in the way that is deemed not worth talking about in section. Has the benefit of doing even better work on it. Thank you for being such a good decision to focus it more in terms of pounds, shillings 1 _20 pound and pence 1 _12 shilling. Deadline is 10 a. Yeats didn't have the gaze. Well done on this you connected it effectively to comments and questions with smaller-scale issues and texts involved in the end of the editorial/proofreading process. 5/5, and showed this in your paper topic sounds a bit more so. I think that you will leave me with a GPA of 3. Let me know as soon as possible when you sense that my baseline expectation for them and what they remember from her discussion in your delivery, and have an A on a different direction. IV. Your delivery was basically solid job of structuring an in-section responses, because that's a good job of lining up a lot of ways, this is a weaker assertion that takes a stand, and failure to notice an email last week of Thanksgiving. I had the pleasure and honor of being, is to call on you two did a good job digging in to the satisfaction of natural desires but as a group, and I hope you're feeling so bad. There are other symbolic associations, as I've learned myself over the break you deserve it. I think that articulating your criteria in this regard is entirely up to you with feedback on a technicality. Overall, this means that that alone would pull you to providing an analysis, and this really means is that you should be an outline of your passage, but perhaps just by one line.

Overall, though. These notes are posted here. Ultimately, why not keep the appointment and show why the comparison is: study Stare's Nest again so that you have to worry about whether you're talking about how you want a passing grade for the quarter is 86% a high bar for anyone to assume that you are not prepared, it's been posted to the class's actual level of familiarity with the text that they didn't cover but that a few others: think closely about it more will also force you to achieve this analytical depth that you make that leap and since this is a jail; a horny, here, I think that this is a productive and insightful way. Alas, what you mean when you do not accept work after the final, which shows that you've learned what the relationship between those terms; and invented a few other things, this meant that they haven't impacted your grade for the text, though. Chris has generously agreed to make progress on your paper space to examine your own voice in order to get to all your material you emphasize if the section Twitter stream for the reader, and I think that there are others that you prepared more material than you'll actually be able to speak eventually if you want to review that document anyway, especially ballerinas. Here are the only one of three people reciting from Godot tomorrow.

I doubt anyone will object strongly. I'm looking forward to your paper and for which you are thinking now, and moderate their responses and discussion of as close to be more flexible, is to call on you second or third, although it's never bad to have coughed up more quickly for you. There are a lot of ways to do more at the logical and narrative structure of your paper as your thesis statement, and I will pick something for you early next quarter, so I can see that, for instance, in fact no masses; there are many possibilities; but a particularly complex poem that requires a Dirty Harry, a heavy course load this quarter.

It's perfectly OK. B 415 435 B 400 415 B-, and you met them at their level of familiarity with the poem's rhythm and showed that you'd put a great deal since you gave a basically strong delivery. You added an I before think I do not override this mapping. On 6 June 1904 is unusual for both of them you'd like, and that you are competing for this. There are a number of presentations. Trying to avoid large amounts of repetition of their relationship. For one thing that's like to offer than you might do productive things with this is to start participating and pick up a critique of the play in this practice focuses on visual readings of The Butcher Boy. Again, you may not be a productive discussion out. All in all ways, what you want to know the novel. I hope your final, misidentifying multiple texts, multiple readings is worthwhile to make—what does old Sull do; added that to give you starting points on the poetry handout for next week already has the maximum possible number of things that are made in them, based on it, then digging in to get into other sections I've worked with. You are in each paragraph, sentence fragments, singular/plural errors, your thesis, because they will have noted that he will not necessarily that you'll have to drop into lecture mode if people don't immediately jump to where you see the text in such an impassioned and showed this in your discussion and question provoked close readings by a group of students on the final metaphorically speaking, and I appreciate your insight. It got cut a bit over, and encouraging the group.

If that absolutely prevent you from being an appropriate topic, I think that it was there when the hmm, he said about them; or IV. And will respond to each other, and not everyone will be spent on reviewing for the four grades outside the box. She's going to be experienced and discussed by presenters: You changed before to as in life in a lot of ways. On the Concept of History sometimes just translated as On the other hand, and you met them at their level of. Doubtless your intelligence and hard-nosed about such things about what you want to engage thoughtfully with what you want to say this not just examining a few things that are likely to find this out is that it is more productive question is a very, very perceptive comments in here, but regularly advancing the group's discourse during the week of 16 June 1904: The study of 'Ulysses' is, despite some occasional problems, although the multiple starts ate up time that you will have to speak if no one else does feeling.

The Playboy of the difficulties too quickly past issues that arise as you travel through your texts, and you really want to discuss how you can just tell me by email: Yes, yes, we could meet at a particular reader's experience of the midterm improved their score between 105 and 118 on the final, which includes more material than was required, and perform without taking the F on his paper are yours and which originate elsewhere. 2-4 around, so you may hit that number this quarter and absolutely capable of doing this. How you want. My wild ballpark guess at this point. What does it tell you that I distribute during class for the recitation into a set of numbers is in this regard. Opening up more midterms from my section website by Friday it's my other section is in line 650; changed nearly to almost in I nearly said; changed Anthropopopometry to Apopometry; changed or to post an audio or video recording, should be on Nov. You're got a number of points for section this quarter, I think that there are potentially profitable analytical path that has profitably set you up for discussion with the boys itself. /Two percent/for leading an insightful, focused discussion about the text than to worry about whether you're technically meeting the discussion overall. You also did more poorly than they probably would have helped in making a more natural rhythm. Let me know. Thanks for being such a good holiday break!

Your writing is generally so sensitive that I say, emigrants during the late 19th and 20th centuries, though it would help to motivate people to participate actively in the background so that you want it to you. Ultimately, what I'd suggest we do have several ideas about it. Good luck tomorrow!

Course Requirements: Punctual, attentive reading. Again, well-structured manner; integrated historical scholarship with excellent close readings as a whole. So a how this is more likely than most of it as they need to cancel my office hours, let them sit over the last two section meetings. You build your evidence pay off as a whole. With an idea of what handicaps they may live? I suspect that much of a pound into 240, though, your readings sometimes fall flat because you're going to be a make-up of the implications of the novel well. Alternately, if you're still listed as TBD, McCabe page 4, explained below was 87. Both are possibilities due to proofread effectively in your hand. No, I can identify it. /11. I saw Cake in Golden Gate Park back in, and the most significant thing to do this effectively, doing a strong job here, and you touched on some important material provided an interpretive problem and resolving complexity in the poem's rhythm and how much your writing, and musical there are a couple of ways that I was trying to take. This is a good student this quarter so far. 05. However, if your dorm forces you to punch through and discarding every possible point for the week. Can we meet at a time to articulate what you will have to do this, we could meet on Saturday can we meet around 2? Attending section that is quieter overall than virtually every other section did much better this week in section, if you'd like. Instead, I think you've got a sensitive and perceptive understandings of them received a boost of a family member requiring that you leave town. You've all earned a break. Because I do tomorrow, OK? Rather than simply being in front of the selection you made constant insightful, meaningful contributions to the connections between the various elements that you're feeling, and change your texts, making little or no and close off further discussion. Thanks for your thoughts would pay off, because I'm trying to get you the option has/has not evaporated, and so it may not be relevant to them from the book it appears in in the actual amount of evidence: a three-syllable metrical foot, accented-unaccented-unaccented. More centrally, I think that one'll work well, any good copy of the work for you straighten out I know that you're trying to crash the course website; if the group up well done here. Theoretically, you had a good selection that the professor is behind a bit of background information demonstration of why it matters—you should take a look at it with a shrug but no vocalization when I saw you come in. Let me know what that is sophisticated, broadly informed paper here is that if you really want to make your reading of them are problem-free. How are you using a Google Docs, too. You have some good ideas for discussion; you also gave a good student this quarter. She knew at once, necessarily, but do feel good about yourself although, in order to move up, too, and you cannot come into my office until 4:30 tomorrow? —You've written a smart move to show how much you like it, should be able to believe in? I think that you want to accomplish in ten to fifteen minutes, Martin Cunningham said, also reciting a companion piece would certainly be one of the quarter have been declared in the early stages but potentially very productive move might be a TA. Dennis Redmond 2. When You Are Old.

Other points for the/exact text/date combinations in as his paper here. In the same deal for improving your grade, which sounds like it passes differently when you're in front of the quarter. I'm sorry you're so sick. Overall, though, you should have read episodes 5 Lotus Eaters, starting with In that series, which are based on my Tumblr blog that are both bitter and mysterious. Have a good weekend, as with students, that there are several alternate readings that you have performed, you don't send it along. Perfect. There is also available. Your paper is due. He said in an automatic failing grade documented here. I haven't started the reading process, and you really punch through to even more in terms of figuring out when to give quite a solid, though never seriously enough to be more flexible, and those that you explain ideas clearly and manage to produce a paper/takes interpretive risks/and demonstrates some grasp of basic issues. By the way that it would have been more successful, however, obligated to agree with the story of Odysseus that treats it as representative, and I'll see you in lecture or section, has improved. I know from section that you wanted to demonstrate that you have some really perceptive things to say: if you pick up every point available for the remaining work final exam yes, your attention more closely on the eleventh line; dropped out from burst out on a different day? Your mapping of geographical space onto ideology is thought out the evidence that supports your specific point of analysis conclusion that broadens and shows larger-scale goals that are working well here. There have been pushed even further. Not feeling well. 20 McCabe first three paragraph exactly of the poem you didn't hear this: one person who speaks in response to your section, not a great paper in a timely fashion, although it's not necessary for purposes of the presentation you would like to recite. Whatever is most called for, say, three people together may perform a recitation and discussion of The Butcher Boy, and I'll have some interesting and sophisticated and deserve to be shown a general idea that will be. Ulysses closely, and I'm glad to be signing up for a change at the last lecture was recitations. Let me know if you want to put in a way that is quieter overall than virtually every other section is UXJU. There are a number of important concepts for the exam.

There were three small errors that don't happen here—it's absolutely not necessary in order to construct a nuanced reading of the novel, too, that cutting one's teeth on him for a specific point of analysis. Good luck on the central interpretive claim at the general overall trend of the quarter, but I'm not as able to recall.

Often a commemorative, not a bad thing, you can better succeed at the definition of home that resonates with you to embrace them, or otherwise just saying random things about the novel drives home the unsettling conclusion that ties together a lot of important goals well, in my office before 5 p. Your delivery was basically solid job of reading and thinking skills here, and perhaps by doing a good job of discussion and were so effective working together that you are traveling with a passage that is causing you stress, then you may certainly choose Heaney poems that we have a really good question to get paid later that day telling you what happened last week of section, I think, to see a specific claim about exactly what you're actually claiming about the relative value of the poem's rhythm and showed this in your delivery was a bit more carefully would have paid off for you. Made any attempt to answer an e-mail off to lecture a bit nervous, but writing as communication, and that part of his paper are yours and which texts you choose as additional sources in question. Looks good. That was also a good job of reading that they've been explicit in the sanctity of gun ownership have their prices quoted in guineas to this, I think that your reader to come to section on Wednesday prevents you from reciting, along with a difficult task. What can be found online at. For your paper as a whole it ties together multiple thematic and plot issues and/or recall problems. You handled your material you emphasize I think?

Again, thank you for being/genuinely amazing. However, this is not to know. Lesson Plan for Week 8: General Thoughts and Notes 23 October in section treat each individual page that you can which specific part of the format or point totals should map onto letter grades, and sometimes present false dichotomies or otherwise, with staying within the 1920s for your ideas develop naturally out of your discussion in section and are comfortable discussing with the Disabled Students Program. I will check your delivery; you have any more questions, and I'll schedule a room available at 1 would 12:30 tomorrow, as a whole. Very well done overall. Are you talking about. I think that it would have helped to think about might be said about your key terms, and preferably by Thursday night. The Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem performing The Butcher Boy well? I'll probably advise him to accept. Your overall narrative for the students.

I'm not committed to any particular essay format has to happen differently in this way, and more specifically into your own experiential metaphor may be interested. You supported each other you give, because I've taught them during my office hours if they could answer more than three hundred papers and scored very well on the board, if you'd like, but perhaps just by doing a number of points. An A is out of your recitation. Ultimately, I will hold up various numbers of fingers to let you do a very good selections for your patience. Let me know, OK? There are a couple of things quite effectively, please let me know whether this happens: 1. What We Lost Eavan Boland, Muldoon, or not, because asking people whether they agree with you, then V for Vendetta and Punishment and whichever other text/date combination if possible. You build your evidence in more depth if you want me to say about the portrayal of Rosie is perhaps productive, but you were my student who sent a panicked email after sleeping into the text.

I'm glad to have a chance. In Conclusion.

Because someone can't count or follow directions; if you have either made arrangements with me on any changes made that are not, however, I think that considering how best to surpass them; or record yourself giving a ten-page research paper will almost certainly already know the episodes from 1:30 does that tell me when large numbers of people aren't going to open up discussion, too, and I will be productive to discuss with tact while also bringing them back to you because I'm sitting here grading papers, but I have your email to the professor is behind a bit nervous, but again, this is not just to post on the other to construct your answer. Let me know. There were some very good recitation and incurring the no-show penalty. Abstractions are not, but th' silk thransparent stockin's showin' off; dropping warm from Out in th' pan for remember you said in lecture tomorrow! Only my mother and some hesitations and corrections, but I don't grade you on Thursday! For one thing that's holding your sophisticated set of political and ethical theories would help to ground that it's important, would help you to get warmed up and there, but th' silk thransparent stockin's showin' off; dropping warm from Out in th' pan for remember you said, you should/always/have completed the assigned texts from Seamus Heaney, From the Republic of Conscience, p. Should Be Free One of these as a whole. You definitely have a very good job digging in deeper; one is simply to assume that you draw to the topic you will receive no points from your section, but not many. If people aren't talking because they will be helpful to think metacritically about your key terms in your printed paper, you might structure your argument from going for, and effectively positioned it as coming in on time. So you can be hard to get 5/5, and you nailed it. I think, and may be that you should use one-third of a problem, but you really want to pick out the pattern. Remember that you should abandon yours, though your paper more rigorously, but will be paying attention to the group while doing so. Let me know if you have any questions, OK? In the meantime or have a thesis yet; just don't assume that I could have more sections like these on the part of the text of the poem and its mechanics may exhibit some occasional problems, including a screen capture, etc. As promised in the front of a text that they always have been even more specifically on presentations of Irish Airman instead. I just graded it you write eight full pages/, please let me know if any for that week; it sounds like you already sent it on the context of conversations about Irish identity that signals that the characters in the play, and even more specifically what the professor was discussing in lecture on/Godot/has not been lost, exactly, think about those parts that build to your discussion tonight. Think about what's actually important to the text s involved. She's going to do with it to highlight/underline and make sure you can which specific part of it is. Answer: Paddy Dignam, e. It's a very solid job here with a C and have it reflected in your work. I think that having a different time. Even if someone else steals your thunder thematically, you can think in an in-depth manner and provided a really strong essay.

Just let me know, that you are one of the first three stanzas Patrick Kavanagh's On Raglan Road: Personally, I think that paying more attention than you might find helpful. Proclamation of the room is big enough and that the rather thin time slice that Joyce gives us of their enthusiastic users until I had hoped, motivating people to open discussion about the text and helping them to their hearts, you should nominate them! You're welcome! And, yes, perfect!

All of these issues, none are egregious or otherwise fundamentally dishonest paper, it refers to illegal alcohol, or turf, from making strong assertions instead of a well-structured overall argument, and thereby enrich your own arrangement, if your dorm forces you to speak eventually if you want to pick up a critique of the reasons that I think I'll refrain, and good luck on the final, or it may change a student's focus rather than moving around on the other members of the things the professor is behind a bit earlier, then asking them questions about this to be more specific way. All in all, this might be to make absolutely sure. I'll accommodate you if you have previously been attending but not the discussions of foot and mouth disease offhand, I think that there is at least one of the class, now they vanish, The Stare's Nest By My Window Yeats, The Young Covey, Rosie Redmond? It's always OK to return to the inclusion of personal likes/dislikes. She twentythree. I'll take back over your first draft, let them sit over the last line of discussion.

This, in this task are defining your key terms construct meaning, and more than 100% of the play's rhythm in the way in to the zombies, who is taken to mean by history if you have read and interpret as a discussion leader for your paper is anything other than the syllabus says that there are also some textual problems that are dangerous for the course for a job well done overall. You do a good night, since we follow Bloom and other parts of your questions? Realistically, you've been working over the last minute and two-year college can be a painful experience? An Irish Airman Foresees His Death 5 p. After all, this is not to castigate you, you'll want to pursue this topic further, though, I think that there are enough similarities there that I didn't have a chance to drop it off with the assumption that you should shoot for this paragraph, but rather that it's difficult to find it quite good. I got hit by a female role model would have helped some, here is going to get you feedback on your paper topic and the Troubles in Keeping Going is a bit like a small boost. Again, well done overall. Where I feel that that is nuanced and sophisticated and interesting thoughts, will result in a close relationship to Celtic myth informs one or more particular poems by Patrick Kavanagh is wide open. —Walter, On the other hand, I think, but I felt the same coin, I would have been capable of doing so. This is the last sentence of the passages in the quarter progresses, but oh well. I wasn't on campus never quarter. If you want to know how well you relate it well to other parts of the test, but will absolutely respond to email me and ask yourself what your discussion plans by 10 a. Instead, make selections that allow people to speak instead of responding to paper proposals is taking an incomplete petition which requires the professor's syllabus.

You are not major, it's not necessary and if, gods forbid, I do have some strong work here; it applies to you? I think and X could be; rather, I'm sorry to take so long to get your main points of view from the Oct 17 vocab quiz: Matthew Arnold's/On the other people are going pretty well, here. He would most need in order to be embarrassed. Very well done. Com that you don't immediately know the etymology of that motivation should be read in ways that this is, well done. I suspect he'll still want people to go. Perhaps most centrally, I myself often find that discussion falls flat, try moving on to this particular offer for several days, and must not look at my discretion, although he is willing in theory disputable by someone else in your proposal that sound particularly productive to discuss whether he could make it by 10 p.

So, ultimately. I grade the first place; something similar could be, and forcing yourself to do that Peets on Lower State and Coffee Cat are both bitter and mysterious, nor even the best way to avoid that would have helped here would help to avoid responding to your recitation as soon as possible and give them by glancing backwards in your section, but you came up to your discussion notes here let me know! There are several difficulties right there. 5% of the selection in the novel and brought up some interesting landscape-related observations, and listens to a specific point. Everything looks good I think it's very possible that you get 90. Very well done! There are potentially productive move might be productive, because you'll want to cover so much mail this week. Again, thank you for being such a way that political lines are drawn?

So, this could be said about presentations of women, his Dynamism of a variety of mostly good, perceptive discussion points were quite good when you argue that something is a default mapping on GauchoSpace for instructors who didn't pick up every single point on the eleventh line; dropped I said to me and let me know, too. You were clearly a bit nervous and halting here, is to focus specifically on the other Godot groups for several reasons, one of the text, be sure to listen for the course of the quarter to answer these questions, and to use for usability. I won't be stolen and have some very impressive work here in a productive exercise I myself often find that the thesis statement make a final answer to this and have some interesting issues. You Should Avoid 'How-to' Guides Like This One By the way that men see and understand women, his relationship with his problematic relationships to women and his Jewish identity in the topic you proposed it's just that there should be examining a specific point of discussion and question provoked close readings by the time section starts this week. Hi! 4, so that people said in lecture is over. Strange feeling it would have paid off for you you can see that your score on the International Communist Current website: good reading of Ulysses opened to the poem and its inherent assumption of innocence until guilt is proven.

You or the novels there's no overlap in terms of culture, although the multiple works that you took advantage of it is constructed by identifying them the main characters is constructed in the dialogue and showed that you've got some really perceptive things to say, and your ideas onto electronic paper is quite a D on a paper to problematize the issues involved in farming note the recurring discussions of foot and mouth disease offhand, I think that a key component of your thesis statement, though My current plan is quite effective in many ways, you've done a very strong job of setting up a real pleasure to read. Again, thank you for being such a strong connection to the end of section in HSSB 2251, and you receive for attending even if it seems like a reasonable conclusion to you after I graded. So what this means that the O'Shea/Parnell scandal indicates something structural about the way that other people to pursue this topic, though perhaps incidental to the small modification that I should be proud of.

You might note that he might call on you first, it was fun having you in section. Section is UXJU. 27 November, though, that it would be that your plans for how you can which specific part of the recording and allow for a lot faster than you already sent it quite a nice, thoughtful, engaged recitation from Ulysses, is to find that, of course, you really want to talk about things that would have to follow up that expectation for them, and it may be freedom. Thanks! All of which is to email me the only person reciting and discussing the selection you picked a longer one than was perhaps perfectly ideal, but I'm hesitant to make progress toward graduation that satisfies you and me assess how much of the most is to add extra space at the first time, it makes life more stressful for you. Is that your ideas will have to put. Thanks! I do not impede the reader's ability to appreciate the argument itself, I don't really start talking until nearly eight minutes into your own thoughts even more closely at whether every word and how is Joyce positioning himself in relation to your paper grade are the victims of a pair. And you're an excellent reader, it feels to me, because I wanted to make sure that you should spend a few extra minutes to fifteen minutes and absolutely capable of working through a series of questions. They're variable in quality, and writing a strong affirmative argument, too, that was purely an estimate based on it not impossible, very articulate paper here, and wanted to make sure that you won't have graded your paper more organically together to make you feel that it naturally wants to do: O'Casey Synge If you want your reader to take so long to get back to you. Remember that one, but probably not necessary for purposes of the way he never claims that unreciprocated love is perhaps explicable by the section, and our general concepts about identity in Ulysses, is, it will eventually force someone to speak can be a little bit.

#Irish literature #automatically generated text #Patrick Mooney #Python #Markov chains

0 notes