#so like even though the story is set in historical japan and may seem far-removed from the experiences of a US or european audience

[kaladinkholins]

Seeing fan discussions about Blue Eye Samurai and especially Mizu's identity is so annoying sometimes. So let me just talk about it real quick.

First off, I have to emphasise that different interpretations of the text are always important when discussing fiction. That's how the whole branch of literary studies came to be, and what literary criticism and analysis is all about: people would each have their own interpretation of what the text is saying, each person applying a different lens or theory through which to approach the text (ie. queer theory, feminist theory, reader response theory, postcolonial theory, etc) when analysing it. And while yes, you can just take everything the authors say as gospel, strictly doing so would leave little room for further analysis and subjective interpretation, and both of these are absolutely necessary when having any meaningful discussion about a piece of media.

With that being said, when discussing Blue Eye Samurai, and Mizu's character in particular, I always see people only ever interpret her through a queer lens. Because when discussing themes of identity, yes, a queer reading can definitely apply, and in Mizu's story, queer themes are definitely present. Mizu has to hide her body and do her best to pass in a cisheteronormative society; she presents as a man 99% of the time and is shown to be more comfortable in men's spaces (sword-fighting) than in female spaces (homemaking). Thus, there's nothing wrong with a queer reading at all. Hell, some queer theorists interpret Jo March from Little Women as transmasc and that's totally valid, because like all analyses, they are subjective and argumentative; you have the choice to agree with an interpretation or you can oppose it and form your own.

To that end, I know many are equally adamant that Mizu is strictly a woman, and that's also also a completely valid reading of the text, and aligns with the canon "Word of God", as the creators' intention was to make her a woman. And certainly, feminist themes in the show are undeniably present and greatly colour the narrative, and Episode 4 & 5 are the clearest demonstrations of this: Mizu's protectiveness of Madame Kaji and her girls, Mizu's trauma after killing Kinuyo, her line to Akemi about how little options women have in life, and the way her husband had scorned her for being more capable than him in battle.

I myself personally fall into the camp of Mizu leaning towards womanhood, so i tend to prefer to use she/her pronouns for her, though I don't think she's strictly a cis woman, so I do still interpret her under the non-binary umbrella. But that's besides my point.

My gripe here, and the thing that spurred me to write this post, is that rarely does this fandom even touch upon the more predominant themes of colonialism and postcolonial identities within the story. So it definitely irks me when people say that the show presenting Mizu being cishet is "boring." While it's completely fine to have your opinion and to want queer rep, a statement like that just feels dismissive of the rest of the representation that the show has to offer. And it's frustrating because I know why this is a prevalent sentiment; because fandom culture is usually very white, so of course a majority of the fandom places greater value on a queer narrative (that aligns only with Western ideas of queerness) over a postcolonial, non-Western narrative.

And that relates to how, I feel, people tend to forget, or perhaps just downplay, that the crux of Mizu's internal conflict and her struggle to survive is due to her being mixed-race.

Because while she can blend in rather seamlessly into male society by binding and dressing in men's clothing and lowering her voice and being the best goddamn swordsman there is, she cannot hide her blue eyes. Even with her glasses, you can still see the colour of her eyes from her side profile, and her glasses are constantly thrown off her face in battle. Her blue eyes are the central point to her marginalisation and Otherness within a hegemonic society. It's why everyone calls her ugly or a monster or a demon or deformed; just because she looks different. She is both white and Japanese but accepted in neither societies. Her deepest hatred of herself stems primarily from this hybridised and alienated identity. It's the whole reason why she's so intent on revenge and started learning the way of the sword in the first place; not to fit in better as a man, but to kill the white men who made her this way. These things are intrinsic to her character and to her arc.

Thus, to refuse to engage with these themes and dismiss the importance of how the representation of her racial Otherness speaks to themes of colonialism and racial oppression just feels tone-deaf to the show's message. Because even if Mizu is a cishet woman in canon, that doesn't make her story any less important, because while you as a white queer person living in the West may feel unrepresented, it is still giving a voice to the stories of people of colour, mixed-race folks, and the myriad of marginalised racial/ethnic/cultural groups in non-Western societies.

[recentanimenews]

Vinland Saga, Vol. 8

Creator: Makoto Yukimura Translator: Stephen Paul U.S. publisher: Kodansha ISBN: 9781682335406 Released: December 2016 Original release: 2014-2015 Awards: Japan Media Arts Award, Kodansha Manga Award

For a time it seemed as though the fate of the English-language edition of Makoto Yukimura’s epic award-winning manga series Vinland Saga was in question. Happily though, Kodansha Comics has been able to continue releasing the series. While the seventh omnibus reached a satisfying conclusion to one of the series’ major story arcs, it was still obvious that Yukimura had more to tell. I honestly believe that Vinland Saga is one of the strongest manga currently being released in English. It is also a personal favorite of mine, so I was thrilled when the eighth hardcover omnibus was finally released in 2016, collecting the fifteenth and sixteenth volumes of the original Japanese edition published between 2014 and 2015. Unlike the past few omnibuses of Vinland Saga, there is no additional content directly relating to the series (I was sad not to see the continuation of the “Ask Yukimura” section), but it does include an extensive preview of Kazuhiro Fujita’s The Ghost and the Lady, another historically-inspired manga available from Kodansha.

Finally free from his life of slavery but still bound by the violence of his past, Thorfinn travels back to Iceland in order to briefly reunite with his family before setting into motion his plans for the future. Accompanied by Einar, Leif, and “Bug-Eyes,” Thorfinn intends to colonize Vinland in an attempt to create a peaceful settlement far removed from the wars and violence seemingly inherent to the Norse way of life. But before that they must first secure the resources and supplies needed for the venture and support from others will be hard to come by–Thorfinn has very little to offer a potential investor except for ideals and his own life. Initially it seemed that they could secure the aid of Halfdan, a wealthy landowner who was already planning to become a relative of Leif’s by marrying his son to the widow of Lief’s brother, but then the wedding doesn’t go quite as planned. Thorfinn and the others may very well have gained themselves a few new enemies when they flee Iceland with Gudrid, the runaway bride.

From the beginning, many of the women in Vinland Saga have been strong, memorable characters (Thorfinn’s sister and mother in particular are marvelous), but for the most part the focus of the series has been on the stories of the men. However, with the eighth omnibus there is a notable change in the manga with he introduction of Gudrid who becomes one of the main characters of Vinland Saga. In fact, a great deal of the plot currently directly revolves around her. I absolutely adore Gudrid. Like Thorfinn, she is struggling against the constraints of what is considered acceptable by the culture and traditions of their society. She has absolutely no interest in marriage or in behaving like a “proper” woman; her heart has always been set on exploring the world around her and expanding her horizons. Gudrid repeatedly proves that her worth is equal to or even greater than that of a man. Eventually, her persistence and brashness pays off although the circumstances surrounding her becoming a sailor are admittedly less than ideal.

Gudrid isn’t the only great female character to be introduced in the eighth Vinland Saga omnibus. Among others, there is also Astrid, Halfdan’s wife, and Hild, a young woman who proves once more that Thorfinn can never truly escape his past misdeeds. While many of the previous omnibuses have been battle-oriented, the eight omnibus tends to pay more attention to the characters themselves and their relationships. However, there are still a few excellent action sequences and Yukimura’s artwork continues to be dynamic and dramatic even when physical violence is not as prominent. For example, Halfdan exudes an aura of intensity and power–the way he is drawn and visually framed is frequently reminiscent of the way King Canute was portrayed, emphasizing his status and influence. This, of course, makes it even more satisfying when Astrid calmly, quietly, and fearlessly puts her husband in his place. (I really hope to see more of Astrid in the future.) Vinland Saga remains an incredibly well-done manga. With a growing cast of fantastic, complex characters, an engrossing story exploring themes of freedom and violence, and excellent artwork, I can’t wait to read more.

By: Ash Brown

[talabib]

How To Create The Perfect Business Culture.

Every business owner and CEO know the importance of workplace culture, even if they might struggle to define it. Creating the right environment for people to work in and making sure the whole company approaches their work with the right attitude can be just as important – and just as difficult – as developing the perfect product or making the perfect investment.

But culture isn’t something unique to the modern world. In fact, there are lessons to be learned from some of history’s great leaders – even ones who seem far removed from the world of business. That’s why this post doesn’t just take in examples from Amazon and other contemporary giants – it also turns back the clock to look at historical leaders and people who transformed cultures in unexpected places, from 12th-century Mongolia to a Michigan prison.

Ultimately, creating the perfect culture for your business comes down to you, because every culture must reflect the specifics of the company in question, as well as the people who run it. This post contains some great advice on figuring out what that perfect culture is and how to make it work.

Culture is crucial – and it's unique to each successful company.

It’s common for business leaders to say that culture is key to a company’s success. But ask for more detail, and the response is often vague. What exactly is culture, and why is it so important?

Let’s start with what it’s not. Culture isn’t the same as values – values are more like aspirations, while culture has to mean something in practice. Culture isn’t the personality of the CEO, either: that can only ever be one part of it.

What’s more, culture varies hugely from one company to the next. Compare Apple and Amazon: the former places such an emphasis on quality that it spent $5 billion dollars on a beautiful new headquarters. Amazon, meanwhile, is famously thrifty – an expense like that would be unthinkable on the Amazon campus.

What culture should be is an expression of the business itself. Bob Noyce, who co-founded Intel in 1968, provides a great example. He found that the developing field of technology, in which it was the engineers who were really driving things forward, needed a new sort of workplace environment. So, he created a radically different business culture that profoundly influenced the development of Silicon Valley. His egalitarian system had no vice presidents; he gave most of his workers stock options; and he sat everyone in a single large room, rather than in separate offices. He also made people go to sessions on what was known as “the Intel Culture.” All of this created a culture in which ideas could flourish – exactly what this innovative company needed.

A great workplace culture won’t magically transform your company into Intel. And a bad culture isn’t automatically a recipe for disaster. Think of a hugely talented athlete with a bad training regime: it’s still possible that they’ll succeed based on talent alone. A better diet and training schedule, though, will still help them to maximize their potential – which is also what culture can do for your business.

In this post, a diverse range of examples from both business and the wider world – stretching all the way back to Genghis Khan – will demonstrate the many ways in which culture contributes to success, and give you some advice on defining your business’s culture for yourself. Because culture isn’t something that can be generalized; it has to be your own.

Toussaint Louverture knew how to imprint cultural virtues in his army’s minds.

The story of the man who abolished slavery in Haiti might not sound like it has lessons about contemporary business culture. But in fact, he created a culture from which you can learn a lot.

Toussaint Louverture was born into slavery on Saint Domingue, as Haiti was then called, in 1743. When an insurrection emerged in 1791, he became a leader. He brilliantly saw off attacks from the Spanish and the British, and in 1801 became governor and banned slavery.

Louverture had a genius for making big decisions that clearly communicated the values and culture he was trying to inculcate in his army. He did so by creating rules that shocked his soldiers and that made them think about the values inherent in the things they did. 

For one, he banned his married officers from having concubines – highly unusual at the time. The reason? Trust. If the officers’ wives couldn’t trust them, why should the army? Louverture’s shocking rules pushed key cultural virtues – in this case, trust – to the forefront of his soldiers’ minds.

Louverture also understood that his decisions had to conspicuously demonstrate his cultural priorities. After he gained control of the island, his army could easily have killed the former plantation owners in revenge. But he made his army understand that the most important thing was economic survival. So he let the ex-slave owners live, and even let them keep running the plantations, harnessing their expertise. Prosperity was more important than revenge.

Using shocking rules to keep people thinking is just as effective in contemporary business as it was in Louverture’s time. Amazon, for instance, encapsulates its famous frugality in the rule “Accomplish more with less.” Early on, this rule was even embodied in the harsh practice of providing employees with office desks made out of a cheap door with legs nailed onto it. This ensured that employees thought about frugality every single time they sat down.

Additionally, Reed Hastings of Netflix made a Louverture-esque decision in 2010, boldly demonstrating his company’s shifting priorities. Though Netflix was enjoying success in DVD rental, he knew that the streaming revolution was beginning. So he stopped inviting his DVD executives to meetings. A tough decision, but one that sent a crystal-clear message about the direction the company was moving in.

Contemporary businesses may face different challenges from Louverture, but his leadership method is still exemplary. The culture to which he aspired was imprinted in everything he did.

Keep death in mind at all times, like a samurai – it’s good for business.

The warriors of ancient Japan, the samurai, lived by a set of cultural virtues known as bushido that still resonate today. Bushido is certainly still relevant when it comes to thinking about business culture.

Crucially, bushido isn’t a set of principles, but a set of practices: it’s about actions, not beliefs. In the modern world, you would liken it not to a set of corporate “values” – the sort pinned up on a bulletin board, which often end up proving meaningless – but instead to corporate virtues. Virtues are all about what you actually do.

The most important samurai rule of all is grim but helpful: think about death constantly. An awareness of the ever-present possibility of death helps you focus your attention, and means that you’ve already accepted the worst possible outcome. In a business context, that means accepting that you could always go bankrupt or lose to a competitor. Accept those possibilities, and you’ll find that you’re free to reflect on more important concerns – perhaps considering whether or not your company is a great place to work or if you’re proud of your products.

Other samurai virtues included honor, politeness, and sincerity: three complementary qualities that translate well to business. When Marc Andreessen set up the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz in 2009, he recognized that the company’s success depended on the entrepreneurs he planned to back. So, he defined one of the company’s cultural virtues as always respecting the entrepreneur. It was a fireable offense to criticize an entrepreneur in public.

But that didn’t mean giving entrepreneurs an easy ride. Another virtue recalled the samurai’s emphasis on sincerity: always tell the truth, even if it hurts. Hard truths, though, were delivered with good, samurai-style politeness.

When it comes to doing difficult things like delivering hard truths, bushido has some sound advice: why you do good isn’t as important as the simple fact that you do. Regardless of your motivations, the only important thing is that you act right. It’s our actions that define us.

Keep that in mind, and if you do die today – or if your business folds – you can still look back on it with pride, as a samurai would.

Shaka Senghor made an amazing cultural transformation while in prison, demonstrating great leadership.

Shaka Senghor would probably have made a good samurai, and there are lessons in his story for anyone in business today. He went to prison in Michigan for second-degree murder at the age of 19, but now, out of prison and a best-selling author, Senghor has a lot to teach us, especially about how to shape – and re-shape – a group’s culture. 

While he was incarcerated, he became the leader of one of the gangs, the Melanics, which he transformed into an organization that ran according to a rigorous moral code. After joining the Melanics, Senghor discovered that they weren’t honoring their own code. He soon challenged the gang’s leaders over their treatment of a member they were stealing money from, pointing out it was against their code to do so. Through asking more questions about virtuous leadership – questioning, for instance, if a leader is really a leader if he doesn’t follow his own instructions – he rose to the top, as the members gradually came around to his way of thinking.

Eventually, having reflected on the pain that violence caused, Senghor realized that he needed to change the Melanics’ cultural code altogether. He did this through constant engagement: he made members eat, work out, and study together. Daily meetings are one of the very best ways to change a culture. Through this, the members moved away from violence and towards a more ethical approach to life.

One important lesson in shaping group culture is to look at it through the eyes of a newcomer. Early in Senghor’s time in state prison, he saw someone get stabbed in the neck, which profoundly shaped his view of prison culture. First impressions generally have a defining effect, regardless of whether or not they’re as dramatic as that. This is why it’s always worth talking to new employees directly about their first impressions, to check that your company culture is shaping people in the right way.

Business leaders should be just as open to change as Senghor was. The CEO of Loudcloud was once almost persuaded to rewrite the accounts to make it look like one relatively unsuccessful quarter had gone better than it had. The suggestion wasn’t illegal, but it did create a misleading impression. An advisor reminded the CEO that, as trust was one of the company’s key goals, he shouldn’t just be keeping to the letter of the law, but exemplifying trustworthiness. So he did. As Senghor showed, you have to walk the talk.

Genghis Khan achieved his success through encouraging inclusion and loyalty.

One of the most important aspects of any successful culture is a sense of inclusion: everyone should feel that they belong there and are working toward the same goals. Inclusion isn’t a contemporary invention – one master of inclusion was also the most effective leader in military history, Genghis Khan.

Born an outcast in 1162, Genghis became supreme, albeit vicious, leader of the Mongol tribes, who traditionally had fought bitterly against one another. What they lacked, Genghis realized, was a common goal – and, in a relentless military campaign, he found one for them.

This campaign can partly be attributed to Genghis’s meritocratic principles. He banned inherited titles, and anyone who excelled could rise up. He also prized loyalty. When he defeated his rival Jamuka, he executed those of Jamuka’s men who had turned their leader in, because of their disloyalty. On the other hand, he enthusiastically brought in talent from vanquished tribes. He made great use of the Uighur peoples’ sophisticated civilization, for instance, sending their skilled workers, like judges and scribes, throughout his empire. He also encouraged marriage between tribes to integrate their cultures.

These are smart practices in any endeavor, not just in times of war, and when it comes to inclusion and loyalty, modern companies can learn from some of them. 

One example of this happened at Frontier Communications in 2004. When Maggie Wilderotter became CEO, she found a starkly class-based system in the company: the white-collar staff barely communicated with the poorly-treated blue-collar workers. So she fired the least effective executives, gave all employees a raise, and always sided with the underdogs in disputes.

It had to go both ways, though: everyone had to be loyal. After Frontier acquired some parts of Verizon, Wilderotter found out that almost half of the former Verizon employees weren’t using Frontier’s product but subscribing to the cable companies with which they were in competition. So, she gave them a month to switch to Frontier – or they were fired.

A CEO adapted his own company’s hiring process toward greater inclusivity by making sure that people from a variety of talent pools had input. This resulted in a company of 50 percent female, 27 percent Asian and 18.4 percent African American staff. Even more importantly, the new hiring process has improved company culture, with people from different backgrounds contributing their different experiences and strengths. Just as Genghis integrated all those different tribes together, the company took the best from everywhere.

There’s no secret formula for creating a great business culture, but you do have to be yourself.

So, let’s get down to it. It’s great to learn from examples, whether it’s Toussaint Louverture or Amazon, Genghis Khan or Frontier. But how can you define the culture that’s exactly right for your business?

 The first step is simply to be yourself. And that’s not just good general advice; it’s the only way to design a successful culture. Being yourself involves knowing your own weaknesses as well as your strengths. Jack, for instance, relishes long conversations – not an ideal attribute when he was CEO of a busy software company. So he surrounded himself with people who weren’t big talkers like him. That ensured that his less-desirable personality trait didn’t define his company.

Your useful personal attributes, on the other hand, should be the cornerstone of the culture. Twitter CEO Dick Costolo, for instance, is an especially hard worker, which was ideal when he first started at the company. At that time, he found he needed to change a culture where people routinely left work early. To encourage staying late, he would go back home for dinner each night, then return to the office and talk to the people who were still there, a very conspicuous way of rewarding hard work and leading by example.

That’s also an example of how culture needs to match strategy: the cultural attributes you encourage need to complement your business plan. For instance, “Move fast and break things” was a great motto for the early Facebook, whose aim was to innovate rapidly. But if you’re the CEO of, say, Airbus, it’s not such good advice.

Which virtues should you choose, then? It’s difficult to generalize, because they have to come from you and your business. But there are some broad points you should consider. First, whatever these virtues are, your new hires should embody them: always hire people well suited to your culture. Second, make sure the virtues you choose are actionable. Like the samurai’s bushido code, they should be things you do, not just idealized beliefs. Third, while the virtues don’t have to be totally unique, they should at least distinguish your company from the competition. If they don’t, you’re like a Silicon Valley tech company who makes a big deal out of allowing casual dress – if that’s the default, it doesn’t matter.

When you think about successful cultures, then, don’t just think about the virtues themselves: think about their context, how they reflect a leader, and how they complement the organization’s objectives.

Good leadership requires strong decision-making – and redefining a culture when necessary.

Sometimes, a cultural virtue will end up having an unforeseen negative impact. When that happens, it’s vital that the company quickly reevaluates and then adjusts its priorities. That requires strong decision-making.

For instance, Research In Motion, or RIM – the company behind the BlackBerry – valued customer satisfaction above everything, and hence developed their phones with long battery life and great keyboard speed. When Apple’s iPhone first came out, the sleekly designed newcomer initially underperformed in those areas – so RIM didn’t take it seriously, and ignored it as a competitor. That proved very costly. The company should have shown flexibility and made the drastic decision to re-prioritize based on the new market context.

An object lesson might have helped RIM make the necessary turnaround; that is, a shocking warning about what a company’s priorities need to be. Say, for instance, a salesperson does something illegal. Simply firing them may not be enough; to place due emphasis on sticking to the law, you may also need to fire the people the salesperson reported to, even if they weren’t personally involved.  

Strong decision-making is tough, and leaders have differing styles. But in general, it’s best to strike a balance between empowerment and control: let everyone have input, but make final decisions yourself. Also make sure to spend an appropriate amount of time on each decision: sometimes there’s great value in rapid decision-making, but not always. For example, at a venture capital firm, decisions on what to invest in require careful and lengthy discussion and debate. Rapid decisions would be counterproductive.

Your decisions will also be affected by whether or not you run what experts call a wartime or peacetime operation. A wartime CEO has to place victory ahead of protocol on occasion, and needs to act fast and aggressively. A calmer, peacetime CEO focuses more on good protocol and longer-term success. Switching between these modes can be hard, and may require different management teams. Apple is one company that’s achieved such a shift: Steve Jobs was a wartime CEO, while his successor Tim Cook operates in peacetime. It’s been a profound change.

In times of crisis or calm, it’s down to the CEO to make decisions that define, enforce or reimagine a company’s cultural virtues – whatever these virtues are. There are a couple, though, that should never be far from a CEO’s mind.

Trust and loyalty are two near-universal virtues that companies should maintain.

While virtues generally have to be specific to an organization, there are a few that pretty much everyone would do well to nurture, from Genghis Khan’s Mongol empire to a tech company like Apple. Naturally, they’re especially difficult ones to implement.

First of all, trust. No matter where you work, make sure your employees trust both each other and you. They should trust you so much that you can deliver bad news when necessary – for instance, when there will be layoffs – and still retain their respect. If they don’t, bad situations will have a habit of just getting worse and worse.

Think about Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. With that speech, Lincoln managed to imbue the American Civil War with new meaning by explaining why so many soldiers had died at Gettysburg. He acknowledged the cost of the war, but also explained why he believed in its significance – a model for any CEO.

Bad news goes both ways, of course, and you should foster a culture in which you always know the worst of what’s going on. Every organization of significant size is home to lots and lots of problems: your job is to know about as many of them as possible. Your employees should therefore trust you enough that they can come forward with issues, and know that you’ll be positive and constructive about them when they do. You certainly shouldn’t blame your employees for problems by default, especially because, at the root, most come up because of fixable concerns like, prioritization.

Though difficult to instil, the other virtue you should definitely foster is loyalty. How can you encourage loyalty between you and your employees? Simply aim to maintain a good relationship with them: take a genuine interest and remain honest. Don’t expect them to stay with you forever, as that’s rare these days – but remember, employees leave managers more often than companies.

Beyond trust and loyalty, your company’s virtues should be truly unique. But if you bear in mind the advice covered in this post – from creating a culture aligned with your own personality, to making rules that show your virtues in stark relief – you’ll be well on track to creating exactly the workplace culture that your company needs.

Never underestimate the importance of a business’s culture. Examples past and present show that culture should be much more than just a list of values pinned to the wall: it should be a set of virtues that underpins everything your business does. That’s because it’s our actions – what we do, not what we say or feel – that define who we are.

 Action plan : Define your company’s own culture. Your culture shouldn’t just be your product’s best features, or your own. It should be the whole approach that you and all your employees bring to work. To test whether this is the case, make a list of the things that make your own company unique, then ask yourself: are those attributes abstract values that you aspire to, or virtues that you can put into practice every time you make a decision? If your virtues aren’t exhibited in all the things you actually do, chances are your culture isn’t what you think it is.