#there ARE precedents most explicitly in i believe Minnesota for people being convicted of writing NCSEM
Note
Proshippers once again proving they cannot read
it's especially funny that they said "the current supreme Court stance" when title 18 was held up by the supreme Court in a 7-2 decision in 2008
#A big reason I want to go into law is specifically obacenity law + protecting kids#I want to formally extend obscenity law to the written word#there ARE precedents most explicitly in i believe Minnesota for people being convicted of writing NCSEM#which i would like to extend into codified federal law or a supreme court ruling if possi#*possible#Anyway enough rambling. Very much illegal very much upheld by the supreme court#csem ment /#theo.ask#anon
10 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
ofaseriesofconversationspar-blog
She Said Hi
scrutinized1
Untitled
designer78
Print On Demand
fremantle-blog
Untitled
officerjcastillo-blog
jasmine.