Tumgik
#whereas with daniels he was playing all the male characters so he himself was moving in and out of parts
variousqueerthings · 1 year
Text
I watched Medea today with Sophie Okonedo and Ben Daniels and basically the ending consisted of him wet, tank-top wearing, blood covered (it's his dead kids', killed by Medea), sobbing and screaming and crawling in a puddle created by water continuously falling onto the stage in a rain effect
and her towering over him, mocking how piteous he is
it was
a lot
(was reminded that I am gay)
Tumblr media
he also at one point posed great statue style for a solid 20 seconds in front of where we were seated, RIP to the dialogue during that moment, twasnt heard by me and my friend
Tumblr media
neither of them came to stage door for covid reasons, which, very fair (I mean, very fair to not come to stage door anyway also), but hope to one day tell them that it was amazing + that the exorcist deserved better
39 notes · View notes
bharatiyamedia-blog · 5 years
Text
What HBO's 'Chernobyl' Will get Proper (And Flawed) About The Worst Nuclear Accident Ever
http://tinyurl.com/yxahh79d Retelling the 1986 Chernobyl catastrophe is an train in unburying the reality. Within the wake of the world’s worst nuclear energy plant accident, which pressured the town of Pripyat in what was then a part of the Soviet Union to evacuate after being uncovered to poisonous ranges of radiation, Soviet officers publicly downplayed the incident.   To at the present time, scientists are nonetheless working to know the results of the deadly explosion. What we do know is that the core of a nuclear reactor opened, sending plumes of radioactive materials into the air. The poisonous fumes not solely contaminated the native vegetation and water provide but additionally poisoned close by residents, a few of whom went on to develop cancer. Inside three months of the catastrophe, greater than 30 individuals had died of acute radiation illness. “We are able to solely estimate the actual results on individuals’s lives,” mentioned Jan Haverkamp, a senior nuclear power professional at Greenpeace, who mentioned the disaster probably had a extreme impression on tons of of 1000’s of individuals. Whereas growing his HBO collection, Chernobyl, the author and producer Craig Mazin approached conflicting accounts of the event with a level of warning. “I all the time defaulted to the much less dramatic as a result of the issues that we all know for positive occurred are so inherently dramatic,” he told Variety’s “TV Take” podcast. For essentially the most half, the documentary is hauntingly correct – excluding a number of inventive liberties. We fact-checked a number of the main plot factors from the collection to find out what’s true and what verges on fable. Observe: This text incorporates spoilers of episodes one by means of 4.   MYTH: The Chernobyl fireplace gave off practically twice the radiation of Hiroshima each hour. Each Chernobyl and the bombing of Hiroshima, Japan, throughout World Battle II had been catastrophic nuclear disasters. However Haverkamp mentioned it is troublesome to match the radiation publicity of the 2 occasions. (Liam Daniel/HBO) With Hiroshima, he mentioned, the key well being impression was attributable to direct publicity to radiation. When a nuclear bomb explodes, he mentioned, an individual’s radiation dose is set by the particular person’s distance from the purpose of publicity. In Chernobyl, he mentioned, “numerous radioactive materials was introduced into the ambiance.” The fabric, he added, was then “unfold over a really massive space” and ingested by individuals over a protracted time frame. FACT: The Soviets tried to make use of robots to scrub the contamination website however ultimately resorted to human labour. In a horrifying scene in episode 4, males throw blocks of radioactive graphite off the roof of the ability plant – what the collection calls “essentially the most harmful place on earth.” In actual life, the lads had been asked to clear 100 tons of radioactive debris from the world. (Liam Daniel/HBO) At a convention in 1990, the official who oversaw the cleanup efforts, Yuri Semiolenko, mentioned the Soviets had initially tried to clear the site with remote-controlled robots. When the machines began breaking down within the poisonous ambiance, officers resorted to human labour. Although superior US robots might have aided the decontamination, tensions between the 2 nations dissuaded Ukraine from asking for assist.   MYTH: A Soviet nuclear physicist named Ulana Khomyuk helped orchestrate the cleanup. One of many collection’ most important characters, a Soviet nuclear physicist named Ulana Khomyuk, is an amalgamation of many nuclear scientists concerned within the Chernobyl cleanup. (Liam Daniel/HBO) For Mazin, putting a feminine character on the coronary heart of the investigation made historic sense. “One space the place the Soviets had been really extra progressive than we had been was within the space of science and medication,” Mazin told Variety. “The Soviet Union had fairly a big proportion of feminine medical doctors.” Chernobyl’s chief scientific investigator, Valery Legasov, however, was an actual particular person. Because the opening episode reveals, Legasov recorded his private account of the catastrophe earlier than hanging himself in 1988. FACT: Squads had been ordered to shoot animals, which carried elevated ranges of radiation. Some of the harrowing scenes arrives in episode 4, The Happiness of All Mankind, when a three-person Soviet squad is tasked with capturing stray animals close to the reactor website. (Liam Daniel/HBO) About 36 hours after the explosion, Pripyat residents had been given just 50 minutes to collect their belongings and board the throngs of buses that had come to take them away. None had been allowed to deliver their pets. Residents initially believed that they’d return after three days, however the transfer turned out to be everlasting. As orphaned canines wandered the deserted metropolis, Soviet squads had been ordered to kill them to keep away from the unfold of contamination. About 300 stray dogs remain within the Chernobyl exclusion zone, however few reside previous the age of 6 due to radiation poisoning.   MYTH: A steam explosion following the catastrophe might have left a lot of Europe uninhabitable. Within the wake of the preliminary blast, nuclear physicists feared a second explosion attributable to melting corium coming into contact with groundwater. (Liam Daniel/HBO) In episode two, Khomyuk informs the us {that a} follow-up explosion would carry a drive of two to four megatons, which might wipe out “your complete inhabitants of Kiev and a portion of Minsk”. The discharge of radiation, she provides, would “impression all of Soviet Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarusia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungry, Romania, and most of East Germany”. Haverkamp mentioned there have been too many hypotheticals thought of on this situation. “They are not saving the world,” he mentioned. “That scenario may play out if all the melting corium hit groundwater,” he added, however when corium begins melting, it melts “in a really uneven method.” The declare {that a} second explosion would carry a drive of as much as four megatons, he mentioned, was “an exaggeration”. FACT: A younger firefighter with a pregnant spouse died in a hospital shortly after the explosion. A firefighter named Vasily Ignatenko and his spouse, Lyudmilla, had been scheduled to depart for Belarus the morning of the explosion, however their plans had been curtailed when Vasily rushed to the power plant at about 1:30 am He promised to wake his spouse when he acquired residence, however his extreme radiation poisoning pressured him to be taken to the hospital. (Liam Daniel/HBO) When Lyudmilla visited her husband, she was ordered to not contact him. “If you happen to begin crying, I am going to kick you out immediately,” she recalled being told within the guide Voices from Chernobyl. Lyudmilla was pregnant on the time however lied to the radiologist to see her husband. Vasily died 14 days after the accident and was buried, as the series shows, in a zinc coffin. The documentary even reveals Lyudmilla carrying her husband’s footwear, which could not match round his swollen toes. Lyudmilla ultimately gave beginning to her child, who died after 4 hours. MYTH: A helicopter crashed shortly after the explosion. The helicopter crash in episode two is not all unsuitable, nevertheless it passed off after the preliminary two weeks of restoration – not, because the episode suggests, within the instant wake of the explosion. In a statement to Men’s Health, Mazin mentioned it was one of many few occasions that needed to be moved round chronologically. (Liam Daniel/HBO) “I wished individuals to know that this was one of many hazards that these pilots had been coping with – an open reactor. Radiation was flying over it,” he advised the location. The collection reveals the helicopter colliding with a crane and cascading to the bottom – an occasion that is represented much more dramatically in real-life footage. Haverkamp mentioned the air actions surrounding the reactor had been unpredictable, however what triggered the crash “was certainly hitting the crane.” This text was initially printed by Business Insider. Extra from Enterprise Insider:   Source link
0 notes
Tumblr media
Artifact: Lady Justice 
          Examining the concept of Lady Justice, the cross-cultural personification of the notion of justice as a blind-folded woman holding a sword and scales, becomes especially interesting when in conjunction with Naguib Mahfouz’s Arabian Nights and Days. Discussions of justice are prominent within Mahfouz’s text, as are the multi-leveled considerations of the actions of characters as being just or unjust. The results of these actions have a direct correlation to this determination. The most culturally relevant aspect of Lady Justice to Mahfouz on a whole is the inclusion of scales to her imagery. This ties directly to Egyptian imagery of Anubis, God of the Underworld and, and his scale designed to measure a soul’s weight against that of a feather. A soul which is heavier than a feather is not an innocent one. Mahfouz, as a modern Egyptian, does deal with these same approaches to justice and judgement through balance. The actions of characters are frequently measured against both their intent and impact to determine the deserved outcome. Pulling from the text, Ma’rouf and his interactions with the Solomon ring are the prime example of what the reader interprets as justice. Ma’rouf is properly righteous and is given control of the quarter as the town crier describes it to be “the wish of the sultan” (Mahfouz 206) and yet this is truly a victory of the people. They are being allowed to escape the injustice of former authorities through the introduction of a good man into the system of oppression. Balance is being returned, highlighting that aspect of Lady Justice and Anubis’ scales as important. The concepts of justice held by the reader is played on heavily, as several innocent people are condemned as well, effectively tipping the scales of the society being presented to be one that is ultimately unjust for most of the novel.
           Justice as a want of the people is stated plainly throughout Mahfouz’s novel and that want demands the fact that there is a lack of justice being realized under the sultan. This is most exemplified through the Imaginary Court. The Imaginary Court functions for the people to restore a sense of justice which is lost when the sultan distributed power to corrupt governors. This play is merely for the emotional benefit of the people, as they expect no real-life ramifications of it to come about. The sultan Shahriyar’s introduction into the scenario is unexpected and, as such, ruins the intent of the interaction. By beheading the corrupt nothing is truly being done to restore balance, as Aladdin cannot be brought back from the dead. Lady Justice is generally depicted with a sword, but one that is facing downwards. Shahriyar’s willingness to turn to the sword alone to solve matters allows Mahfouz to reveal how lacking the role of true justice is within this place. Mahfouz’s role of God within Arabian Nights and Days is comparable to the sultan is terms of justice as well. Most pivotal to this is Fabil Sanaan’s determination that he “want[s] justice” to which he is reminded that “God does what He wishes” (Mahfouz 193). The implication here is that God may not always provide justice it is does not align with personal want, like the sultan. An imperfect ruler and the unattainability of justice under them are key to Mahfouz’s writings.
           The nature of sight must also by examined, as personifications of justice are generally blindfolded. Shahriyar makes several references to this longing to see things; the reader’s introduction to him is accompanied by a call for darkness so he can see the light (Mahfouz 2). This early engagement with the sultan’s conflicting views and attempts to grow as a person allow for consideration of his development. His inability to provide a just society is based on this. He is, on one hand, seeking darkness and the blindfolded nature of justice, but only values it for the ability to see other things. Darkness and, by extension, justice, have no intrinsic value to Shahriyar.
           The lack of value placed upon justice by the sultan and the simultaneous heralding and abandonment of justice by the common folk must be considered for one reason. The personification of justice if largely feminine, and in Mahfouz’s work this is no different. Within Arabian Nights and Days Shahrzad is frequently credited with ending the slaughter of virgins by the sultan and for moving him towards forgiveness. This comes at a great personal expense, as she cannot love someone who does not have balances scales (Ouyang 411) and must instead live in constant fear. It is her very existence which the sultan is punishing himself with (Mahfouz 217) before ultimately abandoning her and disallowing her any kind of justice. Her role as the giver of story is even stripped by Sinbad as she becomes unnecessary to the sultan, as true justice has always been. His attempt to provide what he believes to be right flounders because without Shahrzard there is no personification of justice within the text and all is lost to the sultan.
- Kali Cheesman
          You brought to light some very interesting issues with your artifact and analysis, well done! I especially enjoyed when you spoke about the feminine issue of Lady Justice. I think it’s important to point out that in Mahfouz’s story, there is an absence of influential female characters. As you said in your analysis, the personification of justice is female in Mahfouz’s work as displayed by the character Shahrzad who uses her influence over the sultan to bring justice to the kingdom. I think it is important to notice that the lack of justice and value of justice in this novel correlates to the lack of female influence in the novel. Because corrupt men are the focus and main characters in this collection of stories, corruption prevails in the kingdom. Even when the men attempt to bring about justice with their Imaginary Court, they fail because everything they have done is imaginary. Though they had good intensions, they brought about no results because of the lack of female influence. The portrayal of Shahrzad as the personification of justice and the inability of males to produce justice seems to suggest that Mahfouz believes that justice is a female entity as you state in your argument. - Lauryn Bosse
          After reading your post, I was reminded of a passage I had read in the novel, in which the Governor makes a powerful remark regarding the affects of taking life as a form of justice. He says that “...he who has killed a single soul has killed all people”(Mahfouz 176). Mahfouz shows the reality in this statement through the Sultan's actions. Despite the fact he is carrying out what he feels to be justice( in the from of beheading) the people of the quarter are still suffering, mainly from corruption. However, when the Sultan carries out true justice, and spares the life of Ma'rouf, not only is Ma'rouf saved but the community is saved with the appointment of a fair and just Governor.           Shahrzad's role as the personification of, Lady-Justice is certainly a valid interpretation. Despite the fact that the stories she and Sinbad tell “originate from the same source”(Mahfouz 216), their storytelling styles are worlds apart. Her stories demonstrate justice's blind quality, open to interpretation, creating a balancing force for the Sultan throughout the novel. Whereas Sinbad's tales are laden with his subjective opinions and personal resolutions leading the Sultan to become dissatisfied with the endings and ultimately uncertain with his own.
- Danielle Easley
               Your point is so interesting, and works tangentially to my own. I believe a very real connection can be made between the idea of class/government and justice within Mahfouz’s novel. Naturally, law and justice go hand in hand, but it is a point of philosophy that I don’t think we crossed much into in our discussions during this course – and now I think we missed a hugely interesting debate! Morally speaking, what does the sultan owe to his people, as their ruler? How do we define justice in terms of a hierarchical social system? What must Mahfouz be saying about absolute governments, spiritual morality, and lawful responsibility? But I am pleased too, that we both saw Shahrzad as a point of confluence for these things. The idea that she can be seen as a kind of Lady Justice – or the scale that balances the judge – is fascinating and exciting. 
          I was talking about how Shahrzad figuratively inherits the highest position in the land at the end of Mahfouz’s novel. If we also account for your symbolism, that means that in the end, justice literally prevails, and becomes the  leading figure of the kingdom. I think that there are some issues with Mahfouz’s depiction of women within his text, because I believe that consider the amount of influence – and positive influence – even one character had,  I wonder if Mahfouz is underestimating the effect of women in society, and if he isn’t falling dangerously into the antiquated practice of a feminine binary in his  text, where women serve as symbols, only.
- Kiera Harvell
0 notes