thelogicalcynic-blog

[thelogicalcynic-blog]

Apparently Only White People Can Be Racist.

Cartoon by the late great Bill Leak 

Only White People Can Be Racist. Really? Never has a more racist comment been made.Where do we start? How did the world get to such a stage that social justice warriors and non-whites believe only white people can be racist. They keep reminding us that whites are the majority and only a majority can be racist because of their perceived privilege. The problem I have with that sentiment is that white people are not the majority in the world. Now, it is very difficult to find accurate data on this for obvious political reasons, clearly because if white people were truly the majority, the leftist governments would be publishing this data freely. The lack of consistent and accurate data clearly shows the myth of white population dominance. The definition of racism can be shown as: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

Let’s look at the irony of this statement shall we.

Firstly, there is only one race on the planet. Human. It shows the true ignorance of these retards to imply a man-made category actually changes science. Inconceivable. 

Secondly, If a non-white person engages in any prejudice, discrimination or antagonism aimed at a white person, it can only be considered a non-racist act if that person believes they themselves to be inferior. Do you get it? Only if you feel inferior yourself can this behaviour be considered anything other than racist. However, since I live in a world dominated by morons we all must abide by this rule. Works for me.

Looking more closely at the population by race, for anyone who actually cares enough not to be a hypocrite, you can see that the world population is clearly not dominated by ‘white’ people. Research tends to show that Asia and Africa combine to nearly 75% of the world’s population. Any way you try to change the data, these continents are clearly dominated by non-white people. Further to this is estimates that only approximately 11% of the actual population on this planet is “white”. Those trying to propagate the myth of white supremacy have and still do inflate the percentage of the white population by including those of ‘tan’ or ‘light brown’ skin colour in with the white population. Some information I have researched includes these non-white populations which ultimately decreases the number from those other race pools. These people generally come from the Middle East, North Africa, even into Pakistan and India and Asia. It is a clear attempt at bolstering the number of perceived white people so they can continue with the white dominance agenda

http://www.infideas.com/depopulation-time-bomb/

Diving down a little deeper we can see that minority groups are not only made from skin colour but by different characteristics found within that race. For example, people with red hair make up between 1% and 2% of the world population. That is an incredibly small number. Going by the presumed ability of minority groups to racially abuse others with impunity, one would therefore expect a Ranga to have pretty much free run at slagging off at anyone else in the world. Why, you may ask? Well, it is much known and understood that those with red hair can be made fun of because of the hair colour. This makes all non-red haired people feel superior and as such we of the red tinge are able to freely respond. Moving on to religion. If only those of a minority can and are allowed to conduct racist activities it would explain why some followers of islam believe they are entitled to insult and berate Christianity. However, it should therefore, be quite acceptable for religions which are smaller than Islam to insult that religion with freedom too. I don’t make the rules, I just follow them. The estimated number of Atheists worldwide stands at about 150 million. That is far, far less than the 1.8 Billion muslims or the 2.2 Billion Christians. As these are the 2 largest religions currently all other religions should be able to go them and I will also point out that islam will overtake Christianity in the very near future. This is well publicised and forecasted by many world government organisations. At that time, let’s just see if Christians will be free to insult islam… I think not.

Where am I going with all of this? Well, it is simple. Recently, on April 25th in Australia we commemorated ANZAC Day. This day is a time to pause and reflect on the sacrifices made by those selfless men and women who gave all in the fight for our freedom. This is a very special day to all Australians by birth or immigration and is considered to be politically neutral. Until, that is, an incredibly stupid mouthpiece, Assmouth Abdul-Magpied, representing the most hate filled religion this planet has ever seen, opened her gob and politicised the remembrance.  Have you seen the size of its mouth, you could fit a watermelon in there. This is the moron who, in her words, called islam ‘the most feminine religion in the world’. You know, the one where women are killed for getting raped, female genital mutilation is acceptable, girls of 6 can be forced into marriage, honour killing is considered the norm, and the list goes on and on. That feminist religion.

https://twitter.com/bleakeksplayned

Some have leapt to her defence and said it was an accident but they will not tell you she is currently on the Youth ANZAC committee so she should know well, how important this day is to Australians. If she did not know and it truly was unintended, all the money this tool has been paid to be on that committee has clearly been wasted. Taxpayer money wasted that is. They even say the hypocrisy of the response is based on racism, misogyny or islamophobia. Far from it, she is just a fuckwit who deliberately set about to insult Australia. Give a little, learn to take a little. Retard. I am not racist, a misogynist or islamophobe, I just abhor stupid people. She falls safely into that category.

I have finally arrived at my point. I, as a red haired atheist, am part of both a minority physical feature and a minority religious standpoint. She is African decent and muslim. Both of which are statistically more prevalent in the community than I. Clearly she considers herself to be superior with all of her race and religious dominance characterised by her continual slurs against this country and its religions so I am well within my right to insult the fuck out of this worthless piece of dog shit for all that I want. However, some of her defenders will say I cannot do this because I am white and must obviously feel superior to this arsehole in very way, making me racist. Just remember one thing. I have red hair so not a majority at all. I can get away with it. Like I said, I don’t make the rules, I just follow them. So this is for you Yassmin, you are a vile excuse for a human. You and everything you stand for are completely at odds with western society so feel free to shove your prejudices and religious opinions up your arse, take yourself back to Sudan and use your freedom of speech to start insulting the local population there. Then get back to me and let me know how it went.    

[thelogicalcynic-blog]

So what is it with Easter? I went to the local grocery store recently to purchase the Easter bounty for the year. Incredibly, the brand that I had grown up with had decided to remove the word Easter from all of the products available in that store. Now, this was not a small corner shop where you could expect a limited range but rather one of the largest in the country. The closest reference to Easter was a pack labelled ‘Hunting Eggs” in an egg crate. I had been reading news reports of this in other countries but thought Australia would be immune from this type of blatant appeasement. I was outraged and decided that if Cadbury had made a political decision to remove Easter from its packaging then I would remove Cadbury from my Easter.

Now, it has been made known to me by a rather vocal leftard that Cadbury do in fact have Easter eggs for sale, he found 2 packs containing the word Easter. Investigation of the Cadbury website also uncovered no Easter theme but strangely, the only Easter chocolates mentioned are located in the Halal section. Go Figure. It would appear that removing all reference to Easter from over 95% of your product range is acceptable to these people as long as you can find a small bag of eggs containing an Easter reference. I would only need to take a 5 hour flight to the other side of the nation to get them though…I personally would rather just give my money to a company that prints Easter on its packaging. Easy yeah.

Let’s also be clear about this. The only people celebrating the removal of the word Easter from these products are those who do not believe in the Easter event anyway. Which begs the question, why has Cadbury embarked on this obvious campaign to de-Easter Easter? Well, it is clear they are moving into the Indonesian market and thirsty for sales in other Muslim countries so it is painfully obvious that this is a move to gain street cred with their new potential customers. Pity they are screwing their current customers but the Leftards seem OK with that. One more small victory in a history of altering the norm so that it takes on something which is vastly different to that which we in the West all enjoyed as children. I am fully aware of the difference between celebrating Easter with chocolate eggs and the religious meaning. However, removing the word is the start of the process aimed at destroying the wonder and excitement children enjoy at this time of the year. A well-known Islamic leader in Sydney has even called for muslins to refrain from attending the Royal Easter Show because Muslims should not participate or enjoy Christian celebrations. More likely a warning to stay clear to reduce collateral damage. This is the type of depression being forced onto the youth of that ideology. Please don’t assist them by removing imagination and joy from your child’s mind.

[thelogicalcynic-blog]

He will soon be divided

   Well what we have here is a failure to communicate. Maybe poor Shia Labeouf has spent too much time screaming at a hole in the wall instead of doing his job. This guy is supposed to be an entertainer. He claims to be an actor but apparently he is not doing so well. How can anyone be taken seriously when the premier of a movie makes $11.51. A staggering 1 ticket sold to a premier has just got to be some kind of record. All I can suggest is that he goes back to screaming at the hole and hope that a stranger walks pass and throws a couple of dollars his way to clean himself up a bit.

[thelogicalcynic-blog]

The state of play in the world at present. The humorous contradiction in political and religious ideology makes me laugh. I am known for posting controversial topics on Facebook in order to illicit a response. Mostly just to shit stir but also to be annoying, I am a Ranga so it is expected. During a recent post regarding an Obama appointed judge in America, a friend of mine replied with what I have to say is the most laughable piece of insane logic I have come across in my entire life. He likened my attitude of questioning the professional integrity of this judge to that of a totalitarian state. Now follow the logical progression if you can. I live in a free democracy and enjoy the freedoms that it brings.  This includes the ability to question the actions of those in positions of authority. I don’t care which side of politics the individual belongs to, if the action is clearly hypocritical I will make comment. This would seem to be at odds with a totalitarian mentality. However, this was not the cause of my confused humour. Yes, even I was silent for a couple of minutes while trying to comprehend the comment being made. The comment, as inane as it was, was made by someone who believes in a religion that has to be the closest thing to a complete totalitarian state the world will ever see. I mean, it is a very dangerous activity to question the leadership in some Middle Eastern countries.

You see, this is called projection. These people see the faults in their own belief system and project those faults in the form of insult towards those who express differing opinion.

Everyone has an opinion and everyone has a bias. That is human nature. It is also the reason we must ensure there is a separation of religion and state. If a religious based ideology infuses and takes control totalitarianism will result.

[thelogicalcynic-blog]

[thelogicalcynic-blog]