Please ask first if you want to post my art elsewhere and credit fully. Twitter Redbubble Ko-Fi
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Old Obey Me! art drop because why not (+ my MC!)





p/s: my MC's name is Enu (or petname Emi, since her older twin also named Enu uhm..)
poly 7 brothers x MC btw👩🍳
Also! these are stuff i drew for stress relief so it might look a little... 🥀😞
469 notes
·
View notes
Text
this idea had been brewing in my mind for awhile now n im super glad to get it out! Lmao i just wanted an excuse to draw angry sidon XD i imagine if link continued to bug sidon without having to clean up the totally not gay statue then he would get annoyed
Thankfully both men made up that day :D
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm keeping an eye out for heat stroke in my area and I can't figure out what a full body flush would look like on dark skin since all the pictures are just fake training pictures. Anyone have video/pics of a heat stroke flush on black skin?
17K notes
·
View notes
Text
I dont know why but the idea of Zelda giving ganondorf diabetes is so hilarious to me ;;
12K notes
·
View notes
Note
I was called a genocide denier for *checks notes* telling some fans to stop being bigoted towards Jews.
"Hey it's really important to not target a minority with dehumanization and bigotry-"
"GENOCIDE DENIER!"
It's the exact same silencing tactic the Right has used for decades now. Be loud and obnoxious in the face of facts and when you're confronted on your shitty behavior. Yell some buzzword, make wild accusations, beat your chest.
You're right - that is the exact same silencing tactic.
This has a name.
It's called Moral Bludgeoning.
It's using a false binary morality as a tool to gain an advantage in a disagreement, rather than engaging in reasoned discourse.
The goal of the tactic isn't truth, understanding, or justice. It's enforcing obedience. Control through social punishment.
You said something they found threatening - that people in a supposedly righteous movement were behaving in a way that was, in fact, bigoted.
Grappling with that would require introspection, accountability, and nuance...and their movement punishes those things.
You were pointing out information which doesn't fit into their binary, the binary which assures them they're good people. They needed to shut you up fast before they risked feeling less than utterly righteous.
The people doing this often aren't stupid , but they're always frightened.
They're terrified of complexity which kiddies the narrative.
Terrified of being cast out of their peer group for failing to adhere to the narrative.
Terrified of losing control of the narrative, because most of them derive their sense of personal legitimacy from the narrative.
So they flatten. Nuance becomes complicity. Dissent becomes betrayal. Complexity or moral ambiguity become denial.
You're also right that Moral Bludgeoning is used by both the right and the left.
Both extremes use it to keep the middle silent.
On the far Right, you see this play out in culture war accusations:
Criticize police abuse? You must be a Marxist anarchist terrorist!
Question US military spending? You hate America!
Say trans people should have rights? You're grooming children.
On the far Left, it’s the same energy, but different buzzwords:
Ask for civility toward Jewish people? You're a genocide apologist.
Note that Hamas isn't progressive? You’re a racist colonialist.
Point out antisemitism in "anti-Zionist" spaces? You're weaponizing your trauma to silence Palestinians.
It's never about the truth, it's about making the social cost of nuance unbearable.
Tactics like Moral Bludgeoning are enforcement mechanisms of rigid ideologies.
Healthy movements can tolerate disagreement, but ideologically rigid movements (right or left!) treat any deviation as a threat.
That's why you'll hear the same people screaming about "freedom of speech" one minute, then shrieking “DENIER” the next.
It's not even really hypocrisy in their minds, because they believe their cause grants them moral supremacy which entitles them to do almost anything. And that includes the entitlement to silence you in the name of righteous justice...and be as antisemtic as they like.
The real power of this tactic is in how it bypasses reasoning entirely and goes straight to two of our most powerful emotions: shame and fear.
You nailed this too:
"Be loud and obnoxious in the face of facts..."
That's exactly the tactic. The louder and more confident the accusation, the more it floods the emotional bandwidth of the conversation, making any reasoned dialogue impossible.
It works because people fear social isolation more than factual errors. No one wants to be the next target, so the mob roars together to drown you out.
The tragedy is that you were trying to do what they claim to care about.
You didn't defend war crimes or deny suffering.
You were doing the thing that movements need in order to remain sane: holding your own side accountable to its stated values.
Movements sometimes die from internal intolerance and ideological purity tests.
I think this is part of why the SDS movement of the 60s and 70s fizzled out. I think Occupy Wall Street fell victim to endless internal policing around privilege, language, and ideological orthodoxy and meetings devolved into ritual purity checks instead of coming up with and promoting actual policy ideas. I think this is a good explanation for what brought about the Reign of Terror in France.
The inability to tolerate nuance is where intellectual rot begins.
The people who did this to you aren't fighting oppression. They're just enforcing ideological purity at the expense of reality. It's an old and stupid game.
Can I tell you, though, how much I appreciate this Ask?
It's more evidence that there are many in the large middle who are repulsed by both ends of the Horseshoe. There are many who still care about evidence, reason, pragmatism, and avoiding ideological groupthink.
There are still people who know that justice requires complexity. There are still people who don't think standing up against antisemitism is something to be ashamed of.
Thinking critically and voicing those thoughts makes you feel like a threat to people on either far end of the political spectrum, all who rely on false binaries and performative loyalty.
So keep doing it.
Let them rage. Let them shriek their buzzwords. Just hold the line.
You saw clearly and quickly that this was not about justice, it was about obedience...and you didn't bend the knee.
Do you have any idea how much that pisses them off?
Well done, Anon.
722 notes
·
View notes
Text
Things two hungarian poets from the 1840s said to each other in their letters that make me crazy:
If my soul touches you and it happens to burn you I'm not to blame... it was you who lit it on fire
I swear to you on cottage cheese and tobacco
If the people rule in poetry, so will they rule in politics and that's the goal of the century! To hell with the aristocracy!
My dear buddy,
My soul, my bastard,
My golden mouthed saintly friend,
My rowdy brother,
My lovable dummy,
If you want to see a dead Pegasus, look no further than me
I am trying to learn to smile nicely ( he did not succeed)
My dear friend, you better side of my soul
I will never forgive you for NOT writing the address on the envelope yourself. A woman's handwriting... and a black seal... dear god, the devil took him! he worked himself to death writing poems, he died! ... and then i opened your letter... Never do this again. Only use black seal vax on your death, and even then, still write the address yourself!
I'm reading (your work) for the sixth time. It's really a horrible thing. I'll need to read it again to understand just how awful it is!
Sincerely, your friend whose balls are itching
It's really good that your sore throat is gone, I can finally strangle you
Leave the dedication! Veselényi is a great man but he's still a Lord, and a poet should never dedicate ANYTHING to a Lord
I'm hugging you a 1000000000000 times!
8K notes
·
View notes
Text
Banning all Americans from this blog except the ones who are sound.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
100 year old Galapagos tortoise with a few weeks old Galapagos baby posing for a new family photo, and its own baby photo from 100 years ago.
196K notes
·
View notes
Text
1K notes
·
View notes