please
what if i started expanding the trials in the late roman republic
71 notes
·
View notes
are you going to put any more tumblr users on trial. that was fun
i mean if anyone wants to be put on trial then maybe? it’s only fun if everyone involved is chill with it. i guess i could put myself on trial??? but i have also done nothing wrong in my life ever
29 notes
·
View notes
no more trials! we've run out!
that's the end of the list (civil suits don't count because they didn't have a verdict in the same way)! i sure hope nothing important happened after 50 BCE that 'marked the end of normal functioning of Republican institutions, even if they had already begun to break down in the 50s.' thanks for engaging in the futile endeavour of trying to change history!
if you Do want to experience events after 50 BCE and watch marcus tullius cicero fail to escape the epistolary timeloop then subscribe to e-pistulae (@e-pistulae), where i post his letters dracula daily style. it’s 44 BCE! the second philippic oration is next week :-)
160 notes
·
View notes
historical outcome: C [condemnation], crucifixion at hands of triumvir capitalis L. Calpurnius (14)
you voted to acquit! history remains unchanged!
trial of Alexander
date: unknown
charge: lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis (for the murder of C. Flavius e.R. 150 = ? C. Flavius Pusio e.R.)
defendant: Alexander (slave of P. Atinius)
other: defendant tortured six times
V. Max. 8.4.2
15 notes
·
View notes
trial of Alexander
date: unknown
charge: lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis (for the murder of C. Flavius e.R. 150 = ? C. Flavius Pusio e.R.)
defendant: Alexander (slave of P. Atinius)
other: defendant tortured six times
V. Max. 8.4.2
15 notes
·
View notes
historical outcome: C [condemnation], exile
you voted to acquit! history remains unchanged!
trial of Licinius Denticula
date: unknown
charge: lex Cornelia? de aleatoribus [gambling?]
defendant: Licinius Denticula (or Lenticulus)? sen.?
Cic. Phil. 2.56; Dio 45.47.4
7 notes
·
View notes
trial of Licinius Denticula
date: unknown
charge: lex Cornelia? de aleatoribus [gambling?]
defendant: Licinius Denticula (or Lenticulus)? sen.?
Cic. Phil. 2.56; Dio 45.47.4
7 notes
·
View notes
historical outcome: C [condemnation]
you voted to condemn! history remains unchanged!
trial of Fulvius Flaccus
date: unknown
charge: quaestio
defendant: Fulvius Flaccus = ? Cn. Fulvius Flaccus pr. 212
other: Philippus, slave of defendant was tortured eight times.
V. Max. 8.4.3
7 notes
·
View notes
trial of Fulvius Flaccus
date: unknown
charge: quaestio
defendant: Fulvius Flaccus = ? Cn. Fulvius Flaccus pr. 212
other: Philippus, slave of defendant was tortured eight times.
V. Max. 8.4.3
7 notes
·
View notes
historical outcome: A [acquittal]
you voted to condemn! history remains unchanged!
trial of Gaius Popillius Laenas
date: by 48 BCE
charge? claim?: parricidium? iudicium privatum?
defendant: C. Popillius Laenas tr. mil. 43
advocate: M. Tullius Cicero cos. 63 (Sch. 118)
V. Max. 5.3.4; Sen. Con. 7.2.8; App. BCiv. 4.20; Plut. Cic. 48.1; Dio 47.11.1
The terminus ante quem is established by the date of death of Caelius, who urged Cicero to appear (V. Max. 5.3.4).
50 notes
·
View notes
#he wanted to kill Cicero?#…absolvo (@helenoftroydidnothingwrong)
trial of Gaius Popillius Laenas
date: by 48 BCE
charge? claim?: parricidium? iudicium privatum?
defendant: C. Popillius Laenas tr. mil. 43
advocate: M. Tullius Cicero cos. 63 (Sch. 118)
V. Max. 5.3.4; Sen. Con. 7.2.8; App. BCiv. 4.20; Plut. Cic. 48.1; Dio 47.11.1
The terminus ante quem is established by the date of death of Caelius, who urged Cicero to appear (V. Max. 5.3.4).
50 notes
·
View notes
trial of Gaius Popillius Laenas
date: by 48 BCE
charge? claim?: parricidium? iudicium privatum?
defendant: C. Popillius Laenas tr. mil. 43
advocate: M. Tullius Cicero cos. 63 (Sch. 118)
V. Max. 5.3.4; Sen. Con. 7.2.8; App. BCiv. 4.20; Plut. Cic. 48.1; Dio 47.11.1
The terminus ante quem is established by the date of death of Caelius, who urged Cicero to appear (V. Max. 5.3.4).
50 notes
·
View notes
trial of Gaius Popillius Laenas
date: by 48 BCE
charge? claim?: parricidium? iudicium privatum?
defendant: C. Popillius Laenas tr. mil. 43
advocate: M. Tullius Cicero cos. 63 (Sch. 118)
V. Max. 5.3.4; Sen. Con. 7.2.8; App. BCiv. 4.20; Plut. Cic. 48.1; Dio 47.11.1
The terminus ante quem is established by the date of death of Caelius, who urged Cicero to appear (V. Max. 5.3.4).
50 notes
·
View notes
historical outcome: prosecution ended when verdict favorable to defendant obvious
you voted to condemn! history remains unchanged!
trial of Marcus Cassius
date: during or after 65 and by 56 BCE
charge: lex Papia
defendant: M. Cassius
prosecutors: Mamertini
Cic. Balb. 52
6 notes
·
View notes
historical outcome: A [acquittal] (in first actio) by almost all votes
you voted to acquit! history remains unchanged!
trial of Maesia of Sentinum
date: sometime between 80 and 50 BCE
defendant: Maesia of Sentinum, spoke pro se [for herself]
praetor: L. Titius
V. Max. 8.3.1
42 notes
·
View notes
trial of Marcus Cassius
date: during or after 65 and by 56 BCE
charge: lex Papia
defendant: M. Cassius
prosecutors: Mamertini
Cic. Balb. 52
6 notes
·
View notes
trial of Maesia of Sentinum
date: sometime between 80 and 50 BCE
defendant: Maesia of Sentinum, spoke pro se [for herself]
praetor: L. Titius
V. Max. 8.3.1
42 notes
·
View notes