visualicious

[visualicious]

[visualicious]

[visualicious]

Hitler doing a Volkswagen car advertisement for the owner and one of his biggest donors in 1983

Trump doing a Tesla sales pitch on the White House Lawn for shadow President Elon Musk and largest donor in 2025

[visualicious]

Musk is the biggest government welfare recipient

[visualicious]

Kindness never hurts, on the contrary ....

[visualicious]

The fact that this is 80 fucking years ago but still just as relevant is terrifying.

[visualicious]

History rhyming time

[visualicious]

join the praxis discord - sign up - github

[visualicious]

this IS AWSEOME!!

[visualicious]

Zoozve, my beloved

[visualicious]

HACK the PLANET! :D

So a free tool called GLAZE has been developed that allows artists to cloak their artwork so it can't be mimicked by AI art tools.

AI art bros are big mad about it.

[visualicious]

There are no stupid questions

[visualicious]

wow!

[visualicious]

Guys, stop being crap to creators. You aren’t hurting Amazon. You’re stealing from writers.

[visualicious]

[visualicious]

Hi Neil,

A good while ago, you did ‘Mythology Support’ for WIRED, and you discussed the meaning behind Pandora’s Box (Jar), where you mentioned that you have never been quite sure how to interpret it.

Through years in school studying “ancient knowledge” (that's the direction translating from Danish; I have no idea whether or not that's a subject elsewhere), I have always been led to the understanding that the Gods gave hope as a merciful action. Still, I'm particularly fascinated by the idea that it could be seen as a final cruelty. Maybe it is the cynic in me that is drawn to the gloomier take on the myth, but I seem to find the most sense in that interpretation.

I suppose my question is, are you any closer to which direction you lean in interpretation-wise?

My default these days is to lean in to Natalie Haynes wherever possible.