wondertainmenttoys

[wondertainmenttoys]

ooc: I’ve decided to go with archiving.

If you want to keep track of art I make or just general creative projects, here’s my art blog: @wonderblundrart

Otherwise, so long, it’s been a Wonderful ride!

[wondertainmenttoys]

ooc: hey all, so I’ve been debating with myself on what to do with this blog for a while now and whether or not I should go into another multi-year hiatus, archive it, or just shutter it entirely.

As of now, I am leaning towards either archiving or deleting.

While I still love SCP and occasionally make fanart and such, I haven’t felt attached to Wondertainment for a while now, and I think it shows in the last few bouts of writing I did for this blog.

I figured I might as well give an early heads up while I still decide, so that no one will be caught off guard if they check on this blog and find it’s been deleted.

[wondertainmenttoys]

ooc:

And the gallery has been created!

Click here to see the SCP-173 submissions!

ooc: for those who may now know, the SCP wiki announced last month that they will be removing the image on 173′s article. This is not because the original artist suddenly requested its removal, but is instead a decision  made by the wiki staff.

Here is the O5 Command forum post on this

And here is a video explanation by Dr. Cimmerian

[wondertainmenttoys]

ooc: Additionally, there was an informal contest (that ended a few days ago) where artists could submit their own SCP-173 designs. These images, to my understanding, will be placed on their own page as a homage to the SCP.

ooc: for those who may now know, the SCP wiki announced last month that they will be removing the image on 173′s article. This is not because the original artist suddenly requested its removal, but is instead a decision  made by the wiki staff.

Here is the O5 Command forum post on this

And here is a video explanation by Dr. Cimmerian

[wondertainmenttoys]

ooc: for those who may now know, the SCP wiki announced last month that they will be removing the image on 173′s article. This is not because the original artist suddenly requested its removal, but is instead a decision  made by the wiki staff.

Here is the O5 Command forum post on this

And here is a video explanation by Dr. Cimmerian

[wondertainmenttoys]

[wondertainmenttoys]

SCP-173 from your p.o.v.

[wondertainmenttoys]

Here is SCP-173: The (living?) Sculpture/Stature. I’m a bit unsure about what   it’s official title is because there seem to be a lot of takes (even on the SCP Foundation website?) someone requested! :)

[wondertainmenttoys]

SCP-173 and SCP-6096

[wondertainmenttoys]

A design idea I had for SCP-173 (Not a design “fix,” I prefer the original design anyways and saying you “fixed” someone’s art seems rude to me, especially when not giving constructive criticism)

[wondertainmenttoys]

[wondertainmenttoys]

scp 173

[wondertainmenttoys]

Decided to throw my hat in the ring with the SCP-173 redesign

I remember seeing something like this online somewhere, and wanted to see what I could d with the concept

Really like how it turned out :]

[wondertainmenttoys]

Heyy ik most ppl r upset 173s image is being taken down, but personally I'm happy that this means I can finally draw them how I want <3

Any ways here's my personal design 4 them. Wanted 2 still go w the statue look and added some ideas from "The Koitern" bc I think it's neat :]

Also am extra 096 bc they're besties I can't separate them

[wondertainmenttoys]

Look at me go making a redesign of 173 because I am so original and cool and clever. Jokes aside this was fun to make. (Also the bar stuff in the middle is rebar btw)

[wondertainmenttoys]

Thinking about all of the new designs for 173 and oh my gods everyone got such interesting ideas,, I thought to try make some tooo

[wondertainmenttoys]

My SCP-173 redesign.