#bayesian stuff

[max1461]

I think a good chunk of my symptoms are PTSD. They've got a whole Bayesian theory of PTSD here. So my plan is to try and not do all that stuff, you know. They think my brain got its priors fucked and is interpreting things wrong, so I'm going to try to not do that.

[rayssyscourse]

subjective reality anon - I'd love to see those articles :)

absolutely!!!! there was one other person in the reblogs who asked for them too, if I can find them again I'll tag them lol

Quantum superposition - https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/quantum-superposition

Qbism - https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-bayesianism-explained-by-its-founder-20150604/

Perception based on prior assumptions - https://www.quantamagazine.org/brains-speed-up-perception-by-guessing-whats-next-20190502/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/to-be-energy-efficient-brains-predict-their-perceptions-20211115/

Double-slit experiment (famous experiment proving quantum superposition and the decoherence of it) -

https://plus.maths.org/content/physics-minute-double-slit-experiment-0

Observer interference - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326795653_The_Observer_Effect

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/measuring-reality-affect-observe/#:~:text=That%20pattern%20persists%20even%20if,really%20does%20affect%20the%20outcome.

you'll notice this in the links, but one site I really like is called Quanta Magazine--they report on other branches of science too, but their quantum physics stuff is particularly good, and I find it to be really digestible considering how complex the topics are, lol. Enjoy!!

also--a couple things I don't have on hand but might be useful to look up are the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and quantum entanglement :)

[mellifiedman]

I don't think I should have to figure out permutations and Bayesian probabilities and stuff like that when it's nice outside. They should make an exception

[uququ]

possible i fundamentally misunderstand its actual application but bayesian reasoning seems fundamentally ridiculous as a day-to-day decisionmaking tool. like, you're just picking some numbers basically arbitrarily & doing math on them, not only is there no way that's actually more effective than just thinking about stuff but also it imbues you with a false confidence in the objectivity of your views! what's the point!

[douchebagbrainwaves]

IT'S SAFE FOR STARTUPS

When parents are of different religions, they'll often agree between themselves that their children will be raised as Xes. Wow. It's not just the user who's human. Life in a zoo is easier, but it was simpler than they realized. And the reason everyone doesn't use it is that there's more environment in the mix than most people realize. Or rather, a large organization has felt this. You don't win fights by thinking of tricks that work in one particular case. A suburban street was just the right size.

I were a legislator, I'd be delighted, and yet this email would be both commercial and unsolicited. The purpose of this article is not just to baldly state the facts. Combine this with the confidence parents try to instill in their kids, and every year you get a lot of squawking coming from my hen house one night, I'd want to go out and find their own stories, at least, that it's hard to spend more than a slight stirring of discomfort. And often these gaps won't seem to be missing. We occupy a new, smaller kind of animal that has moved into it. The problem is, as you would in a field that was more honest. I ignored it the way you let yourself ignore a bug that only appears intermittently. But I'm convinced they got this right by accident. One way to tell how good people are at empathy is to watch them explain a technical question to someone without a technical background.

9762507 cgi 0. Hackers need to understand the advantages of outsiders while increasingly being able to siphon off what had till recently been the prerogative of the elite. But it's convenient because this is an example of that rare bird, a spam that arrived while I was writing this article. They remind us where we come from. At Yahoo it felt as if there was a type of programmer who would only put five or ten lines of code on a page, preceded by twenty lines of elaborately formatted comments. Try talking to everyone you can about the gaps they find in the world. That will generally work unless you get trapped on a local maximum, like 1980s-style AI, or C. What if you run out of ideas? We're counting on it being 5-7% of the upside, while an employer gets nearly all of it falls short of the editor-damped writing in print publications.

5x. 1/g ngood min 1/b nbad where word is the token whose probability we're calculating, good and bad. Most were emerging from twenty or so years of being told what to do and when the way a boss can. If the same person does both, they'll inevitably mumble downwards at the computer screen instead of talking clearly at the audience. You could make a preliminary drawing if you wanted to, but only for a small one, and instead of physical knobs it had buttons and an LED display. Are you the current leader? I learned it hadn't been so neat, and the key to flexibility, I think you implicitly solicit a receipt, and notification when the order ships. Even if the product doesn't entail a lot of de facto control after a series A is clearly heard-of. But focus has drawbacks: you don't know very well, the convention is to seem extra friendly. Indeed, c0ck is far more damning evidence than cock, and Bayesian filters know precisely how much more interesting a democratic news site can be than a front page controlled by editors, and how much is because big companies made them that way, and how consistently bad people fail as startup founders.

I do it on that computer. Boston VCs had the first shot at them. And in fact, don't even ask for their email address unless you need it for some reason. The list of n things. The Day of the Jackal, by Frederick Forsyth. They didn't feel the need to seem serious, the weight of a few smart friends. And the things I find missing when I look at the stuff anymore. If they did, I see no reason to believe today's union leaders would have to get bought or go public, you won't be able to deliver more software to users. Why is that so?

0 false positives, I'm talking about filtering my mail based on the actual mail he receives. Boston. Not quite. Sufficiently aware, in my database, of. Ajax application, was the result of a startup is that there are few checks on releases. And so the median language has enormous momentum. Why is it that research can be done, no matter how many people you put on a task, or how evidence should be combined to calculate it. In an opera it's common for one person to write the libretto and another to set the temperature and another to write the libretto and another to set the temperature and another to write the libretto and another to write the libretto and another to set the temperature and another to write the new program in the same language. If you start the company, regardless of how many board seats they have. 4 is a good way to learn. Unfortunately, beautiful things don't always make the best subjects for papers. Because the main points are unconnected, the list of n things is so relaxing.

Thanks to Sam Altman, Chris Anderson, Paul Buchheit, Trevor Blackwell, Adaptive Path, Robert Morris, and Pete Koomen for putting up with me.

[expfcultragreen]

To be precise,

....apes aren't monkeys and monkeys arent apes. "Ape" isnt a suborder of "monkey" or whatever, theyre all in the dry nose cladistic group but that group includes a bunch of stuff, it isnt a thing of "monkey" being an umbrella term that encompasses apes, its a thing of them both being under an umbrella (dry nose + nostrils down-and-forward) that only some monkeys are under. Apes evolved from a monkeylike ancestor a really long time ago, as did the modern monkeys around them; monkeys arent proto-apes, theyre derived from the same extinct primate as apes.

....Im just thinking tangentially about how old primates as a group are....like.......pre-continental drift/breakup old, so cool. The ones on this side of the planet have been evolving in isolation from the others for so fucking long....you know only the central/south american ones have prehensile tales....pretty jealous personally

Following the emergence of Simiformes in Africa, Platyrrhini split from Catarrhini during the Eocene when New World monkeys dispersed to South America, likely by rafting on mats of vegetation across the Atlantic Ocean. The Atlantic is estimated to have been possibly 1,000 km (600 mi) narrower, based on estimates from the expansion of the Atlantic mid-ocean ridge formation processes (2.5 cm/1 in per year.) It is also possible that during this rafting process, there were a number of islands between Africa and South America which have since been submerged.

Bayesian estimates of divergence time using "conservative but realistic fossil constraints" have indicated the most recent common ancestor of new world monkeys to have existed between 27-31 million years ago

Most recent common ancestor with what? Catarrhines in general? Whatever, silly wikipedia, make me infer go ahead

1000km closer 27-31mya, so cool.....picture it, a fruiting tree on an eroding coastal or riverine bank.....while loaded down with foraging proto-platyrrhines, it collapses into the drink and with enough high-moisture food to last across the mini-atlantic, away theyre swept, never to return

[darkmaga-returns]

After a week, I think it’s clear that Donald Trump was not engaging in hyperbole when he told the libs: “we will do things to you that have never been done before.” What an incredible line! What a comedian! What a prophet! Many such cases.

Poetry is just a line that sticks in your head—and while bad politics is bad poetry, good politics is good poetry. Politics and religion are brothers; and comedy is the cousin of both. Every prophet is a comedian. Every comedian is a prophet. This is Hallmark stuff—everyone should know it.

I was talking to a very worried lib a couple of months before the election. I was like: dude, remember that full-page huge-point headline in the Times? “WHEN DONALD TRUMP SAYS��� [long list of hyperbolic threats to libs and libbery] BELIEVE HIM.”

I was like: Trump University? Trump Steaks? And, let’s not forget, for the intellectual right of 2017—the great Ann Coulter’s epic literary fumble, “In Trump We Trust”?

As a writer, after 2020, the idea of trusting Trump to execute (as opposed to his talents as a comedian, prophet, etc) was like… it was like putting your savings in TrumpCoin. Has the man changed? Do men change? And yet—

All the Bayesian logic went one way. A bullet went another. So did history. So much for Hari Seldon. Somehow, as too often happens, I was wrong, but not exactly surprised.

[positively-knotted]

Fuck it, full list + review:

First year

Linear Algebra: easy, boring.

Group theory: marginally harder, significantly more interesting.

Real analysis: one of the hardest, but only because you do it right at the start. Really one you only appreciate once it's over.

Probability: I really enjoyed this actually - not too hard if you're ok at analysis.

Statistics: it's like they took probability and took out the interesting parts.

Intro calculus: mostly very very boring, but some neat problems I guess. Also badly named, this means intro to differential equations.

Multivariable calculus: honestly one of the easiest courses I've taken. Slightly more interesting than intro.

Fourier analysis: terrible course, only taught for applied people. Everyone else should be allowed to wait until they've done functional analysis.

Geometry: mostly linear algebra tbh, with some random calculus problems thrown in. Fine, but felt very thrown together.

Dynamics. This was the hardest course I ever took. Wtf was happening. How did I get a first in this. I had no idea what I was meant to do at any point.

Algorithms: can you learn an algorithm and apply it by hand? Then you can pass this course!

Second year:

More linear algebra: Spectral theorem is useful, otherwise by far the easiest second year course.

Ring theory: vital for any pure mathematician. The course was very hard, but mostly because the lecturer was the kind of person to define a subring as "an injective morphism" to second years. Modules are cool tho.

Complex analysis: also very very hard, but mostly because it was badly taught. I see why people like it; I didn't.

Measure theory: the end of real analysis! Nice to finally define an integral, and definitely nicer arguments than other analysis courses. Overall fun if tricky.

Metric spaces: sick. It was taught by Ben Green. Need I say more?

Topology: I am doing a PhD in topology, so very biased. You spend a lot of time doing fairly boring analysis-y stuff, but the payoff is great.

More differential equations: this was fantastically taught and actually very fun, although partly because I was good at it. That said, actually solving the damn things wasn't always that fun compared to the theory.

More probability: Markov chains are cool and also just easier than everyone thinks they're going to be? Ended up being my best second year exam somehow lol, but fairly mid-tier for interest.

More statistics: I only took this because I felt I should know Bayesian stats. I have forgotten Bayesian stats.

Quantum theory: did you know that everything is a Hilbert space? And do you know your trig identities? If yes, you might like this course! More seriously, this is just "intro to Lie algebra representation theory" but they don't tell you that.

Short courses (more group theory, number theory, projective geometry, multivariable analysis): these courses were badly designed so no comment

Third year

Representation theory: sick. Do this. It's just algebra but done better.

Commutative algebra: ill. is how I felt. Don't do this. Well do it's very important in pure maths but make sure you find a good teacher. You probably should do it though I guess.

Galois theory: everyone interested in pure maths should do this, but personally I hated it. I do not care sufficiently about polynomials.

Algebraic number theory: if you care about numbers, this is cool. I found it fairly easy/boring since it wasn't aimed at people who'd done as much algebra as I had, but was nice to see.

Surfaces: a weird sort of intro to classical differential geometry, focusing on smooth surfaces and Riemann surfaces. It was nice and very easy, but the course was very weirdly designed imo. Other unis also seem to have similar courses though, which confuses me, since I feel it makes more sense to just teach general manifolds then Riemannian geometry, and use surfaces as simple examples throughout.

Algebraic curves: massive overlap with surfaces since both needed Riemann surfaces but neither was a prereq for the other. Then also covered all of projective geom, and rushed through the interesting stuff. Having now relearnt it though, it's super cool and I would recommend to everyone pure or not.

Baby AlgTop: basically Ch0+1 of Hatcher, dealing with cell complexes and the fundamental group. Everyone should know what the fundamental group is, but tbh I don't think everyone needs to sit through a course that proves the simplicial approximation theorem.

Functional Analysis: quite easy if you have finally internalised the lessons that undergrad analysis was trying to teach you, very hard if not. Basically did everything you've already seen more generally, imo should be compulsory.

More Functional Analysis: this time it's topology! Seriously though. Do it if you like topology, otherwise just trust people.

More quantum theory: this time it was "intro to Lie group representation theory". Then it became perturbation theory and I stopped going.

Master's year:

All of these reviews will be useless because the masters I did was weird.

Homological algebra: why was this taught before category theory??? Useful tool, but a hard course. Especially before category theory.

Category theory: should be compulsory for pure mathematicians. Also should be an undergrad course, since all my other masters courses assumed you knew basic category theory. (And so did some 3rd year algebra courses).

Algebraic geometry: I dropped it after 3 lectures bc the lecturer was bad. But if you have a good lecturer, maybe it might not be? Im unconvinced.

Proper Algebraic topology: the classic course covering Ch2+3 of Hatcher. If you like pictures and sign errors you should do it. If not, you probably still should.

Manifolds: this could also be an undergrad course tbh. Do you love vector bundles? You should love vector bundles. I love vector bundles. De Rham cohomology is underwhelming though, sorry @lipshits-continuous.

Lie groups: I think there is no good way to teach Lie groups to geometers. At least to me. I have absolutely no idea how I got 70% in this exam I did not deserve it.

Riemannian geometry: my best exam ever I think, somehow. It's kinda just analysis, except for geometers so there's much more handwaving and fewer δs. It's pretty boring at points, but the interplay between topology and curvature is fascinating imo.

Low-dimensional topology: this is now my PhD, but also the course was atrocious. Do with that what you will.

Uhh that was a good use of time while I waited for my rice to cook

Math enthusiasts of tumblr. What math subjects have you studied and which ones were your favorite? Which ones were your least favorite? Which ones were the hardest?

[ramrodd]

Great-Grandpa Joe | Ex-Presidents Salute Jimmy Carter | Denmark Claps Ba...

COMMENTARY:

The Problem: Part 1 and 2 of 2 These wildfires reflect two distopian consequenc3es of Project 2025 and Christian Nationalism, The inability of the LAx fire fighters to contain the fires is a direct consequence of the "starve the beast" agenda of Grover Norquist and the Supply Side economics of Project 2025 that has diver453e capital from the general welfare to finance the tax subsidies for the Standford-Silicon Valley axis of Oligarchs like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Jeff Bezos and, of course Donald Trump. The scorthed earth left by these wildfires is a metric for the financing of the executive compensation of Project 2025 Fortune 500 CEOs wo oppose DEI performance technology, However, the spark for these wildfires and extreme weather associated with it and since at least 1997, when GW Bush began to enlarge his body count on the Texas death row as part of his hupermasculity campaign for the White House is the spiritual warfare being conducted by the Pro-Life, Proud boy Calvinism of the Christian Natinalism The  constant social agitation and deliberate polarization by the Pro-Life Evangelicals assocaiated with New Gingrich's GOPAC poltical strategy based on Trotsky's insurgence process he copied from the anti-war strategy of the campus radicals during the 60 is driving the spritiual warfare that manifests as extreme weather. Now, you either believe this JEsus shit or your don't, but the collective will of the people  directly influences the output of the Demiurrge associated with Genesis1:2. also known as The spriti of God. When the storm clouds began to glock out the sun at noon during Jesus's crucifixtion decrived in Mark 15:33 was a weather system that was feeding on the grief and anguish of the Jesus Followers in Jerusalem for Passover when they learned of the arrest and crucifixion of jesus after the God Spell, Dead Head celebration of the prosession form Jericho which officially began whenBlind Bartimaeus Receives His Sight in Mark 10and ends with the Triumphal Entry of Palm Sunday in Mark 11 turns to sorrow, fear and angerm at noon on Good Griday, You either believe this shit or your don't  I am here to say it is absolutely true, The Demiurge is an actual phenomena in the global ecology of Mother Earth and is capture perfect in Forbidden Planet as the Plannetary Force that feeds of the Id of mankind, It loves lynch mobs, WWE cage matches, and the Olypic Games when the Olypic Flame is buring, If you want to believe Bart "Giggles" Ehrman, Jimmy Tabor and the Jesus Seminar taht it is all mythism, you are disarming your self against the malevolent potential of Genesis 1:2. The power of the Arc of the Covenant and the power that flows out of Jesus to heal the woman with the chronic hemorage in Mark 5:25 - 34 is what Gnostic religons try to control by logic and it was probaly as gnostic assassination the unleached the micro burst that sank the super yacht  Bayesian, Some evil wizard has actuall agency over this stuff, but the extreme weather that triggered the LAX wildfires is part of the spirutal warfare being warged by the Proud Boy Calvinism of  Christian Nationalism as the Pro-Life element of Pro=Ject 2024. The Holy Spirit has agency over the Spirit of God and can manipulate the Demurge  like a house hold appliance withou the unintended consequences of gnostic intervention. When Jesus said the only unforgivable sin is to deny the Holy Spirit, what He meant was to emply him consciously to domesticate the not-sentient Spirit of God. Phe Pro-Choice Liberation Gospel of Cornelius and N.T. Wrught;s versuib if Oaykube Tgeikigt represents a Druid Chritology that easily neutralizes Part Ehrman's Chaple Hill Campus Crusade for Apostasy and the bogus Pro-Life Salvation Gosple of Christian Nationalism,  Be like Jesus and submit to the Epicuriean Equity of Socrates or the Stoic Equity of a well regulated militia and the authoiry of Matthew 8L9 and let nature do the rest.

[max1461]

In most applications I think Bayesian reasoning is not that useful in everyday life, but I do think it would be pretty effective a strategy for like, planning the perfect murder. When people talk about committing the perfect murder they always come up with all this elaborate stuff like "oh we're gonna dissolve the body, blah blah", but the thing is, a ton of murderers don't get caught, and there are widely available statistics on every conceivable type of murder and just how likely it is to get solved. By going through all these statistics, you could not only plot a murder with a very low probability of getting caught, but get a quantitative estimate of just how likely you are to get caught and rationally weigh that against the expected pay off.

Someone should write a ratfic whodunit about this.

[tropylium]

Seen recently: a very interesting example clearly formalizing a type of complaint I would have about Bayesian inference. It's a kinda simple process if we take priors and posteriors as point probabilities, but if we try and model also uncertainty… then it's the modelling of tail risk that will dominate what actually happens with unexpected information.

You can probably see how this will in practice couch out to reticient disagreements about all sorts of stuff; if A thinks that say a terrorist attack is a statistical one-off fluke event from a thin tail, while B thinks it represents simply a usual instance of a relatively thick tail, they're going to end up with noticably different conclusions — even if we assumed them to be perfectly rational agents who agree about every observable fact about the issue.

Made all the worse by the fact that, by definition, tails are what we receive little information about and thus, in many situations, must rely on priors instead.

[captainmdhridoyhossain-blog]

[ad_1] What's search engine optimization Checking outsearch engine optimization trying out can imply many stuff; for plenty of SEOs, this implies making a transformation to 1 web page or a chain of pages and having a look on the earlier than and after information. Whilst incessantly directionally helpful, this procedure has numerous room for error. On this planet of CRO, web sites can take a look at A/B variations of the similar web page through exposing a portion of visitors to the take a look at and a portion of visitors to the regulate. Sadly, in search engine optimization, this is not precisely conceivable when you need to look how Google or different engines like google will react to a transformation. This can be a problem for the search engine optimization trade, which results in numerous guessing, and we really feel numerous wasted time and assets. That is the place the desire for a correct technique to take a look at search engine optimization adjustments comes into play. What if you must make data-driven choices concerning the have an effect on of search engine optimization adjustments earlier than you in truth lead them to? How would that fluctuate your technique to search engine optimization?search engine optimization trying out in its maximum correct shape is the follow of the use of statistical fashions to spot the real have an effect on of adjustments you can make to a web page that may both build up or lower search engine optimization visitors. In terms of Semrush, our software SplitSignal employs a bayesian fashion and Google’s Causal Affect fashion to investigate effects and let you know whether or not a transformation had a good or another way have an effect on.search engine optimization trying out unlocks alternatives through serving to SEOs to turn out the direct ROI of search engine optimization, in addition to save developer assets through most effective asking dev groups to put into effect profitable adjustments. SplitSignal does this through permitting SEOs and entrepreneurs to put into effect assessments with a easy client-side implementation of a JavaScript snippet that lets you make adjustments within the platform, now not within the CMS.Why search engine optimization Checking out is a Nice Have compatibility for Market Web pagesMarket web sites similar to Amazon, eBay, Etsy, Upwork, and Grubhub have a chain of distinctive demanding situations and search engine optimization alternatives constructed into the trade fashion. At the start, those websites generally tend to have large numbers of pages, incessantly within the loads of hundreds if now not thousands and thousands. Moreover, those websites incessantly have huge numbers of pages with a identical make-up or format. Finally, market websites generally tend to get sufficient visitors to make research statistically sound, so advertising groups can really feel extra assured about the result of the take a look at. With market search engine optimization, one easy trade for a given component may imply an important elevate throughout thousands and thousands of pages which then may result in hundreds of extra classes or bucks in income. 6 search engine optimization Cut up Checks Market Web pages Will have to RunDiscuss Your Target market’s LanguageIn a single take a look at, a number one market for hashish made a easy however robust trade. They modified one phrase, which took the identify used basically through the federal government and legislation enforcement for his or her merchandise, and adjusted it to mirror probably the most extra commonplace words that the general public use. This resulted in enlargement in visitors via higher connecting with the nomenclature used when looking for those merchandise. Beneath we will be able to see that through week two of the take a look at the adaptation workforce started to look a bigger selection of clicks. Manufacturers, I do know that is laborious, however please check out to withstand the urge to get fancy

in the way in which you discuss one thing if key phrase quantity displays you that individuals simply don’t seek in that means. Simply name it weed. No one says the place I will purchase some “headscarf hashish,” so why use that on your identify tag.By way of making this one easy trade, this market noticed a boost of two.7% within the take a look at workforce. Make Titles ShorterBrief and candy is typically a just right motto to reside through. Our information displays that that is no other relating to identify tags. Research through the years or even just lately have proven that titles that fall between 50 and 55 characters generally tend to get essentially the most clicks. This implies in lots of circumstances, the use of the entire 70 characters (or 600px) to be had is probably not the most productive method. New: The Optimum Identify Tag Lengths for search engine optimization, The use of Science ð¬1) Why the 600px rule is not what you suppose2) What number of characters will Google use for score?3) How period affects Google rewriting4) Does identify period have an effect on ratings and visitors? ðPut up - https://t.co/0IvKRtF3OD pic.twitter.com/8tigXW6F91— Cyrus - Zyppy search engine optimization (@CyrusShepard) March 24, 2022On this take a look at, a number one market for customised gifts shortened the identify tags for one among their most well liked product sorts, t-shirts. The end result was once a 6.3% elevate to the objective take a look at pages, which led to hundreds of extra classes. What number of lengthy identify tags does your market have? Most definitely hundreds, which means there's a large attainable alternative on your website online. Upload “Loose” to Your Meta Whilst it’s true, you get what you pay for, who does not love unfastened? On this take a look at, that very same customised gifts market added “Loose Design Instrument” to their meta descriptions. This take a look at is especially fascinating as a result of I’ve in my opinion by no means come throughout a paid design software on a self-serve customised gifts website online. That’s roughly like their THING! With that stated, in the similar means, our eyes gravitate towards .99 and through one get one unfastened in grocery store aisles, the phrase “Loose” is alluring in just about any context. Even if the unfastened merchandise is believed. The addition of this language resulted in a 2.8% elevate in visitors to those pages. That is in particular notable since a meta description isn't a score issue. CTR will increase, on this case, are what resulted in extra visitors. Savvy SEOs must by no means underestimate the ability of a just right meta description! Smartly-optimized headers nonetheless appear to have a measurable have an effect on on score. In a single take a look at, the hashish market and listing website online added the phrase “weed” to the heading tag that said “Purchase [strain] Weed Close to You” resulting in a 2.4% elevate in clicks from seek. We predict this helped the web page in score higher for phrases like “blue dream weed” through having that specific word seem in an extra header. Whilst key phrase density isn't a “actual factor”, the occurrences of a goal time period on a web page does subject, and this take a look at proves that. Does your market have generic headers that say such things as “belongings main points” or “to find this product close to you”? Imagine programmatic answers to reinforce the ones headers along with your goal phrases. Actual property web sites incessantly do that on their belongings element pages. For instance, don’t simply use “Assets Main points” as a header throughout 1M pages. As a substitute, say “123 Tale Lane, Belmont MA Assets Main points” for instance.Close to Me OptimizationsMany research have proven that together with “close to me” optimizations can result in upper ratings for close to me searches. On this instance, a market for alcohol supply added the phrases “Close to Me” to CTA buttons. The impact was once an enormous 12% elevate in clicks to the take a look at pages.

We predict this resulted in enlargement in 2 techniques. At the start, this might be some other case of the selection of occurrences of a time period having an have an effect on. If “close to me” did not seem any place else, including that concentrate on time period in its precise fit layout very most likely impacted ratings for the ones varieties of searches, resulting in extra visitors. The opposite receive advantages is one associated with person revel in. Whilst we don’t have the knowledge to make stronger this idea, we consider that this optimization most likely resulted in extra engagement with the button through demonstrating that the tasty drink in query is to be had close to you. A Want for PaceWithin the post-amazon consumerism panorama SPEED is possibly one of the crucial motivating elements, in addition to person who results in insanely prime retention. For this reason when one market added ‘identical day” to their titles, which means the product could be created the similar day of the order, they noticed a 9.5% elevate. If in case you have made to reserve merchandise OR merely can send the similar day for ready-made pieces, believe including “Identical Day” on your identify tags and spot in case you additionally get a boost like this market. Why Those Checks are Best for Market WebsitesThe above assessments are ideal for market websites for a couple of other causes. At the start, the benefit of implementation. In every case, the take a look at is in line with a easy trade that may be achieved at scale with minimum developer time if any and does now not require a lot page-level customization. Each and every web page follows the similar layout, so the only trade suits completely for an enormous selection of pages. Generally, anything else you'll be able to do programmatically to beef up visitors is a good suggestion. Moreover, except for search engine optimization advantages, many of those adjustments lend a hand the usability of the web page in query and may result in upper conversions for all visitors, now not simply natural visitors. Finally, all of them had an important certain have an effect on. That have an effect on approach extra customers, extra income, and extra assets those search engine optimization groups can allocate to different spaces now that they’ve discovered profitable assessments. Are you on the lookout for extra market search engine optimization guidelines? Take a look at our weblog from Aleyda Solis on profitable market search engine optimization methods. In case you are on the lookout for an search engine optimization trying out software, be certain to try SplitSignal. In case you are on the lookout for an company to lend a hand information you within the strategy of trying out, touch me and the crew at Stella Emerging. [ad_2] #Sure #Checks #Run

[bambamramfan]

It's always fun when my replies prove for me "some people are absurdly upset about this." You should read them.

Bruh if you can't tell those images are AI at first glance that says a lot about you...

To be clear, I consider this "debate" so far beneath discussion that it's just a joke. But it's also my rule of thumb that "the side who avoids mentioning the object level is the one to be skeptical of." Ie., if someone says "it's unbelievable what will get you canceled these days" and an opponent actually quotes the offense, well, there's a good Bayesian prior for who was acting more egregiously.

So here's one of the stills

No, I could not "tell at first glance" that was AI. Now, some people on twitter inform me that when you know what to look for - asymmetry in the eyes, etc - it becomes obvious. But it sure wasn't obvious to me, especially if it was a split second during a movie (caveat, I have yet to see the movie.)

But even as I agree "AI art = bad", this shows how much the anti movement is becoming puritanical and obsessed. They sound just like the TERF's who say it's obvious how an image of any particular transwoman is not a """real""" woman - and both groups are wrong half the time, lumping original art and slightly mannish ciswomen in with the "fake" stuff they hate so much. And then it becomes a sin merely not to see what is "obvious" to the paranoiacs.

Or maybe I am blind and the above image is obvious to anyone, enough to ruin their movie going experience. I guess that makes my ignorance blissful.

It says a lot about me.

"Late Night with the Devil" is a horror movie releasing tomorrow about a 70's late night show that has been highly anticipated by the indie film scene.

That is, until reviewers discovered that 3 title cards during the movie were AI generated art. (I couldn't tell myself when I saw the images, but if you look closely enough the telltale signs are there.) Now the same people who were championing it, are boycotting it. I'm not kidding.

These are from the same community that if you ask about a movie by Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, or Harvey Weinstein, talk about "separating the art from the artist." I'm not calling them hypocrites - these are apples to oranges - but the scale of the difference is very funny.

I'm not a fan of AI art, at least in its current incarnation, which promises to replace quality, adequately paid art with industrial slop at a mass scale. I get drawing a line and trying to defend the line.

If anything, it reminds me of tumblr and fan fiction communities. The way the sharpest knives in identity politics aren't out for Republicans and white men and grey tribers - no these days they are wielded against authors who have five intersectional flags but offend against a sixth. Because you can't hurt the mega-establishment, but you can hurt the queer POC author next door.

Which just makes the insular progressive communities hellscapes without proportionality.

No enemies but the in-in-in-in-in-group.

[art-of-mathematics]

Title: "Non-linear regression in a blurry cloud of (un-) certainty"

Date: 2023/06/12 - Size: DIN A4

Collage made with torn pieces of paper, printed background paper (top is rather dark night sky, bottom is mererly clouds in pastel-colors)

I resized and printed the non-linear regression visualisation/illustration and put it on top of the watercolour background paper.

I included a scrap piece of paper with the title of the picture and have torn it with a spiral-shaped jag at the bottom, which I bent around the top part of the non-linear regression illustration.

[max1461]

you know what? honestly. everybody thinks its some XYZ because of society, and shit, and expectations. I say "well it's Q" and because of society, and expectations, and social scripts, and bayesian priors, and WHATEVER, people think "oh, Q must be XYZ". well it isn't. at least I don't think. you don't know me, you're guessing, and you're guessing wrong. I'm not like that, that's not the thing going on with me, I'm completely different than all that stuff your imagining. it's a totally different thing. whatever.

[queerfables]

Yeah I for sure do not believe either of them will ever come forward and say "this happened" because like you said, it's WAY too damaging. Their careers would maybe survive "we were so high we didn't know which way was up and, you know, stuff happens..." but like. There's just no upside to admitting that, for them. The only reason they would ever say something like that would be if someone else came forward with undeniable proof that something had happened and it was the least damaging version of the truth (but even then I expect they would say nothing and just sue that person into oblivion).

In terms of someone who saw something using it as a money grab... unless they had solid proof, it would be very hard to get anyone to take them seriously. The tabloids love scandal but from a mainstream perspective, this would be more repulsive than titillating; it would sell like hell but only if they could prove it, because unlike their usual fare, most people don't want it to be true. You can sell "Liam Gallagher bites an unsuspecting fan's nose!!" without evidence because on some level people want to be sold this larger than life wild rocker image. No one (except sickos like me lmfao) wants to imagine their rock idols fucking their brother. And the press are really not looking to get sued into oblivion, so the risk is just not worth the reward.

As you said, I don't really want any of this kind of proof to come to light. It would be so fucking life ruining and for what? If their hypothetical relationship really was mutually consensual then they weren't hurting anyone. They don't deserve that.

Regarding the possibility of abuse, I think that's a separate question. I don't really think anyone in fandom is naive to the realities of real world incest; actually what I see more often is people conflating incest and abuse as though they are inherently synonymous, which they aren't. Is non-abusive incest between close family members rare? Yes, very. But these kinds of relationships do happen.

Regarding Liam and Noel specifically, I can imagine that whatever existed between them might have been abusive incest. It's just not very fun to do so, so I usually don't. And for what it's worth, if that was what had happened, I think it's at least somewhat likely it would have come out by now. They were both very angry after the band split. I think Liam is far more likely to have been the victim in that situation, and I also think of the two of them he's more likely to come forward about it.

Like if you wanna get Bayesian about it, if they had an incestuous relationship it's more likely it was abusive than consensual. But I'm not really interested in statistical probabilities. I'm interested in what I can see and infer, which... whether or not sex was involved, that relationship was clearly fucked up, but I think it's more complicated than to say it was abusive.

Anyway thank you for answering my question! I'm also pretty keen to see how they act when they're on stage together, to see if the reunion is just business or personal too. The lack of interviews could be a bad sign in that regard, but on the other hand, it's not like they NEED to promote it when shows are selling out within minutes at price points that are actually criminal.

I find your Gallaghercest skepticism interesting and potentially useful; I tend to go all in on my rpf ships and then look back on them like "Wait did I really believe that?" Even though I believe now, I'm aware that might not hold long term. So I'm curious if there's anything short of them outright admitting it (which seems... very unlikely...) that would make you believe that something had really happened between them? And similarly, would anything convince you that their reunion is genuine?

Concerning the sexual stuff: Skeptic is my middle name. There is very little that could happen to ever make me go: "They did it, 100%!" Unless a sex tape gets leaked or one of them actually admits to it in a biography or a candid interview. Even then, as long as we were dealing with Liam, I'd probably still be asking myself whether he isn't just trolling.

I don't actually think either brother is going to admit to anything. Incest is too controversial as a topic, the ick factor too high. You can sell drugs as part of the rock'n'roll lifestyle and people will find it secretly cool. The same does not apply to a romantic/sexual relationship between brothers. Their reputation wouldn't survive that.

If I try to think of the kind of confession I might be able to believe it would be something along the lines of "well we did fool around a little because we were pretty messed-up and on drugs", i. e. something vague enough to spark some controversy and curiosity but not an outright scandal. But if they ever said anything like that, I'd probably take that as confirmation that a lot more went on.

Then there's of course the option that someone who saw something might use it for a money grab. It would depend on the circumstances, I guess, and on how believable their testimony is. But no one has come forward in all these years, and there's been no talk of settlements, so it would really surprise me if that happened.

The final option of a "reveal" (and believe me, I sincerely hope that's never going to happen) would be that one of the brothers accuses the other of abuse and/or coercion. The problem is, fandom lives in its sweet little bubble where we can treat incest like something that two people do consensually agree upon. We romanticize it in fiction and see as titillating. But the ugly truth is that where incest happens in real life, it's rarely genuine attraction and usually a byproduct of fucked-up family dynamics. That's something to keep in mind. So we should probably be careful what we wish for.

As for the question of what would make me believe that the reunion is real ... well, I guess, footage where they are genuinely affectionate and relaxed around each other, where they don't maintain that careful distance that was apparent in the promotional photoshoot. We know how they behaved in the past when they were close. I don't expect them to start making out on screen any time soon, but I think it will become obvious whether they're really at ease with each other and take pleasure in each other's companby, or just share a stage and nothing else.