#mike wallace
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
deadpresidents · 4 months ago
Text
youtube
17 notes · View notes
agentfascinateur · 1 year ago
Text
The "Better Men" in my eyes
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Mike Wallace; Wissam Nassar; Wael Dahdouh; Banksy; Bernie Sanders; Cyril Ramaphosa; Marwan Bishara; Ofer Cassif; Marc Lamont Hill; Yanis Varoufakis.
☮️♾️💟
32 notes · View notes
burtlancster · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
another pm east walk-off clipping
2 notes · View notes
oldshowbiz · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Mike Wallace Lets Himself Go
12 notes · View notes
emma-dennehy-presents · 4 months ago
Text
Really hope Helio Castroneves finishes and places decent today. I want to see the whiners cry more. Specifically all the people that thought Mike Wallace should have been here instead.
2 notes · View notes
fredricwertham · 5 months ago
Text
“The term [Gotham] has gone in and out of popular favor, having great currency in one decade, falling into desuetude the next. It owes its most recent revival to the 1989 movie Batman and its sequels, themselves a reincarnation of the late 1930s comic books. When New Yorkers Bob Kane and Bill Finger first created the caped crusader, they were going to call Batman’s hometown “Civic City.” That seemed a bit dull, however, and Finger “tried Capital City, then Coast City. Then, I flipped through the phone book and spotted the name Gotham Jewelers and said, ‘That’s it,’ Gotham City. We didn’t call it New York because we wanted anybody in any city to identify with it. Of course, Gotham is another name for New York.” Actually, as a later Batman editor perspicaciously noted, Gotham is New York’s noirish side—“Manhattan below Fourteenth Street at 3 A.M., November 28 in a cold year”—whereas Superman’s Metropolis presents New York’s cheerier face, “Manhattan between Fourteenth and One Hundred and Tenth Streets on the brightest, sunniest July day of the year.” —Gotham: A History of New York City to 1898, Edwin G. Burrows and Mike Wallace
2 notes · View notes
noctomania · 1 year ago
Link
“National Archives - Palestine - National Security Council. Central Intelligence Agency. (09/18/1947 - 12/04/1981). - This film is a Columbia Broadcasting Service (CBS) documentary with Mike Wallace on the Palestinian leadership and their use of paramilitary organizations, such as Black September and the Palestine Liberation Organization, to promote terrorism in Israel. - DVD Copied by IASL Scanner Thomas Gideon. - ARC 643907 / LI 263.346 “ 
Publication date: 1976
watch time: 20min
4 notes · View notes
spilladabalia · 1 year ago
Text
youtube
Women - Drag Open
3 notes · View notes
thenewdemocratus · 2 years ago
Text
The Mike Wallace Interview: Rod Serling (1959)
. Rod Serling is obviously famous for The Twilight Zone and that he created it and he created Thriller as well and several other shows. But what I believe is his mark on Hollywood is that he gave millions of Americans the ability and freedom to look at a world that is completely different from their reality. To escape their reality and to see a world that did not exist, to sort of paraphrase The…
youtube
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes
onceuponadream-rpg · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
¡Llegamos a nuestros héroes! Dispuestos a arriesgarlo todo para proteger a sus seres queridos y a sus reinos.
5 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Bill Moyers, left, covered the 1976 Republican National Convention in Kansas City, Mo., for CBS, along with, clockwise, Morton Dean, Mike Wallace and Walter Cronkite / CBS Photo Archive/Getty Images
0 notes
burtlancster · 11 months ago
Text
mike wallace on burt walking off pm east after he questioned him about his temper
2 notes · View notes
oldshowbiz · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
youtube
Why can't we just stream every single episode of 60 Minutes ever made... we know they have them...
6 notes · View notes
scottguy · 8 months ago
Text
Reporters treat all late-term abortions as if they are on-demand procedures always performed on perfectly viable babies as a murderedous form of birth control.
Wallace says the woman is "deciding to abort her own pregnancy."
Implied is..."as if it's a normal healthy pregnancy" as if that procudure is being for NO good reason except the mother's own convenience. The woman.... just changed her mind. That's what you pro-choice people want, right, to murder healthy babies.
That is the huge ugly lie propagated by religious zealots for two decades now about late-term abortions.
(Because it sounds SO bad if you don't understand the reality. The religious want to imply an utter lack of morality or humanity. )
In actuality, the choice is a mother delivering an already nonviable fetus (or one which will die instantly after birth) fetus which delivering may also destroying the mother's fertility forever or cause her to die of sepsis. These are situations of dire medical necessity
Just Wallace asking that question without mentioning the ACTUAL extreme scenarios in which these tragic late-term procedures occur is bad, lazy, sensationalistic journalism.
I expect better from you, Mike Wallace.
Wallace is implying that mothers AND doctors are gleefully murdering kids JUST because early common, widely accepted abortions are also legal too. They are entirely different things.
They are conflating early abortions of choice with late term abortions of absolute medical necessity.
That's the lie.
They are not the same thing. Just because they both involve dilation and curretage does not equate the REASONS for that procedure.
Early abortions are for a woman to protect her family and her future when birth control has failed. She may have more kids than she can handle. Or she may be entirely unable to care for just one child. That is absolutely a woman's right. The products of conception in her are not anything close to a human being. It can't possibly survive outside the womb until six months.
People who decree "it's a child" are saying that just to be emotionally manipulative and to win an argument based on an emotional lie.
Pete Buttigieg does a good job describing late term abortion situations that are medically complex and heart wrenching for all involved. Often the fetus is either dead or can not live outside the womb. The child's death is INEVITABLE. Yet, Mike Wallace implies a perfectly healthy pregnancy with his brief question.
No one stops to realize that NO doctor would *ever* perform such an unethical procedure and mindlessly abort a healthyvl baby in a healthy mother! Do you really think mothers and doctors are such monsters? These only happen when medically indicated and as a last resort.
Zealots just *want* to believe doctors and mothers are monsters to justify draconian anti-choice laws that cause sickening, tragic, and deadly outcomes for INNOCENT women.
Stop treating obstetricians as if they are car mechanics who will murder a healthy fetus if they are simply paid the fee. That's another ugly lie.
Woman don't need to die senselessly for an advanced ectopic pregnancy or hundreds of the myriad possible complications of pregnancy which could endanger her life.
Republican politicians know nothing of any of these maternal medical complications because they are NOT doctors. They're just ignorant politicians interested in votes from religious zealots. Just because you got a lot of fools to vote for you doesn't grant a political hack the power of life-or-death decisions over a woman regarding her own body.
How can anyone claim to care about "life" when they are fine with adult women bleeding to death in mutiple states for no good reason and leaving behind orphaned children?
It's sickening that this now happens.
When did an unviable fetus become more important than the living breathing adult woman who is often already a mother that is carrying it?
I hate that reporters are more interested in sensationalistic questions than in asking intelligent questions incorporating all the current factual information.
Was looking up the number 6000 the sum extent of your research on the topic Mike? 6000 ooh! How shocking! How scandalous!
Why do these happen? Meh!
F*ck you, Mike Wallace. Next time...
Think a little before you assume the worst as the Catholic church has manipulated the public, and YOU apparently, with propaganda.
Journalists are supposed to be smarter than that.
Do a little research and design your questions to address the actual reality. Acknowledge that these situations aren't even close to morally black & white as your loaded question implies. You know ... journalism! Tell people about complex reality. That's the job you know.
A much better question cqould have been, "These late term abortions, they really aren't a choice of convenience are they?"
But then you wouldn't get to ask your shocking question, would you?
Women and doctors are sick and tired of Republicans and ignorant/lazy journalists LYING and implying that they are both mindless butchers.
The REAL mindless butchers are the Republican politicians who are allowing healthy living women, often mothers, to die of sepsis or blood loss in waiting rooms, in emergency rooms, at home, and in hospital parking lots where that woman was just refused care by doctors who are too afraid to treat her because the state threatens to throw doctors in jail for the act of saving a woman's life.
Why don't you ask a few questions about *that* situation, Mike?
You want scandal? That seems pretty damn scandalous to us.
Tumblr media
Pete Buttigieg is a next-level public speaker.
A third-trimester abortion has to be the most devastating moment in a person's life.
Too many opponents of abortion will never process these situations. They will put themselves in someone else's shoes.
12K notes · View notes
famousborntoday · 2 months ago
Link
Myron Leon Wallace was an American journalist, game show host, actor, and media personality. Known for his investigative journalism, he interviewed a wide range...
Link: Mike Wallace
0 notes
fredricwertham · 5 months ago
Text
“[Washington] Irving had begun his efforts at coining a lineage for New York in the Salmagundi papers (1807), a set of sardonic essays, penned with two equally irreverent and youthful colleagues, in which he affixed the name Gotham to his city. Repeatedly Salmagundi referred to Manhattan as the “antient city of Gotham,” or “the wonder loving city of Gotham.” In the context of the pieces—mocking commentaries on the mores of fashionable New Yorkers—the well-known name of Gotham served to underscore their depiction of Manhattan as a city of self-important and foolish people. Gotham—which in old Anglo-Saxon means “Goats’ Town”—was (and still is) a real village in the English county of Nottinghamshire, not far from Sherwood Forest. But Gotham was also a place of fable, its inhabitants proverbial for their folly. Every era singles out some location as a spawning ground of blockheads—Phrygians were accounted the dimwits of Asia, Thracians the dullards of ancient Greece—and in the “Middle Ages Gotham was the butt of jokes about its simpleminded citizens, perhaps because the goat was considered a foolish animal. The Gothamite canon, which had circulated orally since the twelfth century, was eventually printed up in jest books, the first being Merie Tales of the mad men of Gotam (c. 1565). It included such thigh-slappers as the one about the man who rode to market on horseback carrying two heavy bushels of wheat—upon his own shoulders, in order not to burden his mount. Another tells of the man of Gotham who, late with a rent payment to his landlord, tied his purse to a quick-footed hare, which ran away. Manhattanites would not likely have taken up a nickname so laden with pejorative connotations—even one bestowed by New York’s most famous writer—unless it had redeeming qualities, and indeed some of the tales cast Gothamites in a far more flattering light. In the early 1200s—went the most famous such story—King John traveled regularly throughout England with a retinue of knights and ladies, and wherever the royal foot touched earth became forever after a public highway (i.e., the King’s). One day, John was heading to Nottingham by way of Gotham, and he dispatched a herald to announce his arrival. The herald reported back that the townspeople had refused the king entry, fearing the loss of their best lands. The enraged monarch sent an armed party to wreak vengeance, but the townsfolk had prepared a scheme to turn aside John’s wrath. When the knights arrived, they found the inhabitants engaged in various forms of idiotic behavior: pouring water into a bottomless tub; painting green apples red; trying to drown an eel in a pool of water; dragging carts atop barns to shade the wood from the sun; and fencing in a cuckoo. The chortling knights reported back to the monarch that the townsfolk were clearly mad, and John accordingly spared them. This rival variant—that Gothamites merely acted silly to gain their ends—was reflected in the old English saying “More fools pass through Gotham than remain in it” (and echoed in Shakespeare’s depiction of Edgar in Lear, “this fellow’s wise enough to play the fool”). It was doubtless this more beguiling—if tricksterish—sense of Gotham that Manhattanites assumed as an acceptable nickname.” —Gotham: A History of New York City to 1898, Edwin G. Burrows and Mike Wallace
1 note · View note