#project scope and cost estimates

[asestimationsconsultants]

Key Factors That Influence the Accuracy of a Cost Estimating Service

Accurate cost estimation is essential for the successful completion of any construction project, as it provides a clear financial framework that guides decision-making. However, achieving accuracy in cost estimation is no easy task. A variety of factors come into play that can influence the precision of a cost estimate. These factors can range from market conditions to the experience of the estimator and even the tools used in the estimation process. In this article, we will explore the key factors that influence the accuracy of a cost estimating service and how these elements contribute to reliable project financials.

1. Quality of Data Used

The foundation of an accurate cost estimate is the quality of the data on which it is based. For cost estimating services to produce reliable estimates, they must use up-to-date, accurate, and comprehensive data. This includes material costs, labor rates, equipment costs, and historical data from similar projects. Outdated or incomplete data can lead to inaccurate estimates, potentially causing cost overruns or missed profit opportunities.

Estimators often rely on databases that contain industry-standard pricing information. However, prices for materials and labor can fluctuate due to market conditions, supply chain disruptions, or inflation. By using the most current data, cost estimating services can ensure that their estimates reflect the true cost of the project, minimizing the risk of budget discrepancies.

2. Estimator Experience and Expertise

The experience and expertise of the cost estimator play a significant role in the accuracy of the estimate. An estimator with years of hands-on experience in the industry will have a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in a project. This knowledge allows them to better assess risks, anticipate potential challenges, and select the most cost-effective materials and labor sources.

An experienced estimator will also be able to apply their expertise to recognize patterns from previous projects, avoiding common pitfalls and ensuring that the estimate is comprehensive. In contrast, a less experienced estimator might overlook critical factors, leading to underestimates or overestimates that can affect the project's budget.

3. Scope of Work and Project Complexity

The complexity and scope of a project have a significant impact on the accuracy of a cost estimate. A large, multifaceted project with many moving parts will be more difficult to estimate accurately than a smaller, simpler project. Projects that involve multiple contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers will require detailed coordination, and failing to account for all variables can result in an inaccurate estimate.

Cost estimating services must ensure that every aspect of the project is considered when generating an estimate. For example, the cost of permits, inspections, and site preparation work must all be factored into the overall budget. Inaccurate scope definition can lead to significant discrepancies in the final cost estimate.

4. Use of Technology and Estimating Software

The use of technology and advanced estimating software can significantly improve the accuracy of cost estimates. Estimating software such as Procore, Buildertrend, or CostX allows for more precise measurements, better data management, and improved collaboration between project stakeholders. These tools often have built-in databases with current material prices and labor costs, which reduces the chances of errors caused by outdated or incomplete data.

Additionally, modern estimating software often includes features like real-time updates, integration with other project management tools, and digital takeoff capabilities. These features streamline the estimating process and help estimators generate more accurate estimates more quickly, improving overall project efficiency.

5. Location and Geographic Considerations

The location of a project is another critical factor that can influence the accuracy of a cost estimate. Construction costs can vary significantly based on geographic factors, including local labor rates, material availability, and transportation costs. For example, building a project in a remote area with limited access to resources may result in higher material and labor costs, as additional logistics may be required to transport goods and workers to the site.

A cost estimating service must consider regional price differences when creating an estimate. Failing to account for location-based cost variations can result in an underestimation of project costs, leading to potential budget issues down the road.

6. Market Conditions and Economic Factors

Economic factors and market conditions also play a key role in influencing the accuracy of cost estimates. Fluctuations in the prices of raw materials, labor, fuel, and equipment can all impact the overall cost of a project. For instance, a sudden rise in the cost of steel or concrete due to supply shortages or increased demand can make a significant difference in a project’s total cost.

Cost estimating services must stay informed about market conditions, including global supply chain issues, trade tariffs, and inflation. This awareness allows them to adjust their estimates accordingly and provide a more accurate prediction of future project costs.

7. Level of Detail in the Estimate

The level of detail included in a cost estimate is a key determinant of its accuracy. A high-level estimate, which only includes broad cost categories, may not provide the level of detail required to capture all potential costs. For example, an estimate that does not break down labor costs by trade or fails to include specific materials may result in significant inaccuracies.

On the other hand, a detailed estimate that accounts for every item required for the project will provide a more accurate picture of the total cost. This includes breaking down costs into smaller categories, such as material quantities, labor rates, equipment usage, and overhead costs. Detailed estimates allow project managers to track expenses more closely and identify areas where cost savings can be made.

8. Timeframe and Project Schedule

The timeframe for completing a project is another critical factor in estimating its costs. Construction projects that are scheduled to be completed in a shorter period may require additional labor or overtime, leading to higher costs. Conversely, projects with longer timelines may result in increased costs due to inflation, changes in labor rates, or the need for extended equipment rentals.

Estimating services must consider the project schedule when providing cost estimates. A well-defined schedule allows estimators to account for potential cost fluctuations based on the time required to complete the project. Inaccurate scheduling estimates can result in underestimating labor and equipment costs, impacting the project’s overall budget.

9. Risk Assessment and Contingency Planning

Risk assessment and contingency planning are essential components of accurate cost estimation. Every project involves a degree of risk, whether related to weather delays, unforeseen site conditions, or changes in regulations. A good cost estimating service will assess potential risks and build contingency allowances into the budget to cover these uncertainties.

By factoring in potential risks and creating a financial buffer, estimators can ensure that projects are prepared for unforeseen challenges without exceeding the budget. Failing to account for risk can lead to cost overruns if unexpected issues arise during the project’s execution.

Conclusion

The accuracy of a cost estimate is influenced by a variety of factors, ranging from the quality of data used to the experience of the estimator and the complexity of the project. By considering factors such as the scope of work, location, market conditions, and technology, cost estimating services can provide more reliable and realistic estimates. With a thorough understanding of these key factors, cost estimators can help ensure that construction projects stay within budget, minimizing the risk of cost overruns and contributing to the overall success and profitability of the project.

[probablyasocialecologist]

While they contribute little to society, welfare ranchers on public lands demand a lot in the form of subsidies whose scope is a testament to their outsize power and influence. It’s estimated the state and federal largesse to the industry amounts to between $500 million and $1 billion a year, all of it funded generously by the taxpayer. This includes below-market grazing fees for cows and sheep, fence construction, road building and maintenance, cattle guards, forage improvement and seeding programs, poisoning of unwanted vegetation, forest clearing, stream diversions, water projects such as dams, pipelines, aqueducts, stock ponds and troughs, the monitoring of livestock health, and control of predators and other mammalian and avian pests deemed a threat to the industry. The U.S. Department of Agriculture operates a specialized hunting and trapping unit—referred to by the Saboteur as “hired killers”—that slaughters tens of thousands of animals each year to aid public lands stockmen, including coyotes, beavers, and prairie dogs. Ranchers also receive generous federal and state tax write-offs for every cow they graze, along with reduced state property taxes for their private deeded lands. They are additionally “blow-jobbed,” as the Saboteur put it, by the very agencies that are supposed to be preventing their overstocking and overgrazing of public lands. The Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are the primary culprits in this charade of regulation, in which it appears the cowboys run the show and the bureaucrats are their puppets. The industry is thus provided all kinds of preferential treatment and survives on the dole because in the arid conditions of the West, where the climate conspires against cattle production, it cannot do otherwise. “Western cattlemen are nothing more than welfare parasites,” wrote author Edward Abbey, the literary father of the eco-sabotage movement in the United States, who also observed that cattlemen “survive by hiding behind the cheap mythology of the ‘Cowboy’: literally, a boy who looks after cows.” Abbey was hardly alone in coming to this conclusion. Conservative pundit George Will opined that an inner-city mother on public assistance was “the soul of self-reliance compared to a westerner who receives federally subsidized range privileges.” The industry, naturally, wants ever more privilege. The primary advocacy group of ranchers who exploit the public domain is the Public Lands Council, which is funded and staffed by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, a political and cultural giant in the annals of lobbying. Every few years, the Public Lands Council issues a policy document to outline priorities for Congress and the White House. Katie Fite, an ecologist with the nonprofit Wildlands Defense in Boise, calls it the “Welfare Rancher’s demand letter.” “The Big Hats basically want super-duper extra special status for every welfare ranching permit holder,” she told me in an email, “because if you have herds of cows or sheep you are a Lord.” Among the common demands: the general annihilation of prairie dogs, a keystone species already 98 percent gone throughout the West but which ranchers still consider a pest; the stripping of Endangered Species Act protections for the trifling number of remaining grizzly bears and for “all species of wolves” in the United States; and rollbacks of key provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires environmental impact assessments of all commercial activities on federal lands, including ranching operations. The Public Lands Council has also sought to amend the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act so that wild horses can be killed because they compete for forage with cows. “They want wild horses in the West pretty much GONE,” Fite wrote me. “The Endangered Species Act rendered meaningless/GONE. They want a free hand to grossly pollute water. They attack just about everything good or positive with public lands and the environment.”

1 April 2025

[captainxtra]

Major June 26th Political Update!

So, Paxton vs Free Speech Coalition and Birthright Citizenship + National Injunction cases will be settled most certainly tomorrow.

Keep an eye and ear out.

------

Now onto the Spending Bill news!

Here is a combined summary of all the updates from the Politico articles I checked:

The Republican-led "megabill" (also referred to as the "One Big Beautiful Bill") is facing numerous challenges and undergoing significant revisions due to rulings by Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough and internal disagreements within the GOP. Republicans are pushing to pass this comprehensive domestic policy bill—which includes tax, defense, energy, immigration, and health care provisions—before a self-imposed July 4 deadline, using the budget reconciliation process to bypass a Democratic filibuster.

Key Challenges and Parliamentarian Rulings:

Medicaid Provisions: The parliamentarian has dealt a major blow to the GOP's health care plans by ruling that several key Medicaid provisions cannot pass with a simple majority. This includes a plan to reduce Medicaid costs by cracking down on state provider taxes, which was expected to generate substantial savings, and proposals to exclude undocumented residents from Medicaid. These rulings have created an estimated $250 billion budgetary shortfall for Republicans.

Civil Service and Pension Reform: Initial proposals to restructure the federal workforce, such as giving federal employees an "at-will" designation and billing unions for official activities, were ruled out of order by the parliamentarian. Republicans are now exploring changes to their pension reform plan, proposing to increase federal employees' retirement contributions to 15.6 percent (from 9.4 percent) to help fund the megabill, though members of Congress, their staff, and federal law enforcement would be exempt. Democrats and unions strongly oppose these changes.

CFPB Funding: Senate Banking Republicans are proposing to cap the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) funding at 6.5 percent of the Federal Reserve's operating budget, a reduction from the current 12 percent. An initial attempt to eliminate CFPB funding entirely was deemed ineligible. This new proposal awaits parliamentarian approval.

AI Moratorium: The parliamentarian has requested Senator Ted Cruz rewrite a proposed 10-year moratorium on enforcing state artificial intelligence (AI) laws, clarifying its scope of funding. While the measure is tied to a new $500 million fund for AI infrastructure, concerns remain that it could implicitly affect the entire $42 billion broadband program. The AI moratorium has also created divisions within the Republican party.

"Revenge Tax": Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has asked lawmakers to remove a projected $52 billion "revenge tax" from the megabill, stating it is no longer necessary due to a "new understanding" with other developed countries regarding a global tax agreement, where central taxes will not apply to U.S. companies.

Overruling Parliamentarian: Despite calls from some conservative Republicans to do so, Senate Majority Leader John Thune has stated that the Senate will not move to overrule Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, emphasizing the importance of preserving Senate norms.

Approved Provisions:

SNAP Plan: The parliamentarian has approved a modified version of the Republican plan to shift some costs of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) onto states. This is a significant win for Republicans, as it allows them to maintain a crucial $41 billion spending cut for the bill.

Internal Republican Divisions & Negotiations:

Medicaid Moderates: The proposed reduction of provider taxes in Medicaid expansion states is facing a "Medicaid-fueled mutiny" from moderate senators like Susan Collins, who find the proposed $15 billion rural hospital stabilization fund "inadequate." Some are threatening to block floor debate without more clarity on Medicaid changes.

SALT Deduction: Blue-state Republicans have rejected a Treasury offer to raise the cap on the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction to $40,000, calling it "unrealistic." This remains a key unresolved issue.

Public Land Sales: Five House Republicans have declared a "red line" against including public land sales in the megabill, threatening to vote against it. They view it as a "grave mistake" and a "poison pill." This provision also faces strong Senate opposition.

Leadership Meetings & Deadlines:

Senate Majority Leader John Thune met with President Donald Trump at the White House as Republicans work against their self-imposed July 4 deadline. There is skepticism among some in the Senate GOP about whether they can get the bill to the President by this deadline. An initial vote to begin debate on the bill is now not expected before Saturday.

Kansas Governor Laura Kelly (D) anticipates that Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), despite his objections to certain bill provisions, will ultimately vote with his party due to pressure from the comprehensive nature of the megabill.

The combination of parliamentarian rulings, internal Republican dissent, and complex negotiations across various policy areas is making the passage of the "megabill" a challenging and fluid process.

------

It seems that the bill is still being worked on so contact your Senators on troublesome provisions, reminding them to invoke the Byrd Rule against troublesome provisions should a procedural vote come before a new text is released.

General Page to call on the bill:

Page to call against Section 203, the provision that targets courts by requiring an expensive bond be payed to sue the government:

Page on AI regulation Ban:

------

Oh and congrats to Zohran Mamdani!

[woebegonefanzine]

Updates and some FAQ answers!

We are already over 20 sign ups, thank you for the interest so far!

As of now the scope of the project based on interest check:

This will be a W.BG only zine.

There will be no strict theme! So long as you keep it “in universe” you can do whatever you like! Our plan is to include as many different characters and scenes as possible. Canon ships are all welcome!

We’ve had mostly artist sign-ups so far, more writing options would be great! Reminder that we’re accepting fiction as well as non-fiction for this project! (Meaning you can get meta and write an essay on the music in the show if you want!)

We want to be as clear as possible as to what this project will entail, but since we want to leave it open to anyone doing anything it’s hard to nail down! If you have any direct questions on what will be welcome we will be happy to answer!

As of now, every person who’s signed up will be making it into the project - we estimate every person who signs up will be accepted to at least 1 role.

We’re still looking for moderators! There’s been a lot of interest but not a lot of applications! The more mods we have the more people can join as well!

The current mod team consists of:

K.M. @threearmsally

Acting as Lead mod and finance/shipping (if goals met)

(@/malevolent-fanzine, @/malevolenttarotzine, @/malevolentfairytalezine, @/mycupofteafanzine, many others.)

Mar @xenoglssie

Acting as Art and Merch mod

(@/malevolent-fanzine, @/malevolenttarotzine, @/malevolentfairytalezine, others)

The zine itself is planned as a digital PDF with the opportunity to be made physical with both digital and physical merch options. All projects led by us go as close to “at cost of production” as possible.

There will be no profits made off of this - it’s entirely for the love of the fandom!

If you are having difficulty with the application or sign-up forms at all please reach out! We want everyone who wants to join to be able to!

Right now our only social account is on Tumblr, but feel free to share this project with everyone who may be interested!

A carrd with all the details including estimated schedule will be coming shortly!

Thank you!

Reminder that the interest check will remain open until January 15

Contributor sign ups will remain open until Feb 15

Mod applications open until Feb 01

[askagamedev]

Is classic game porting/remastering becoming its own specialization? What I mean is, of course it's happening more these days, so/but is space growing to be someone who specializes in these projects? Or is it still niche enough that the small number of teams/staff who do it will continue to do it?

The answer here is "kind of". Here's the main issue - game development is expensive. AAA studios are expensive and cost a lot to run, assigning a AAA studio a remake/port project is not really worth it when compared to the estimated return on investment. Instead, what game publishers often do is contract out the remakes/port job to an independent third-party studio. This has two major benefits.

First, it costs notably less than the publisher putting their own internal AAA studios on it. When you're doing a remake/port, you often don't need super high fidelity assets or extremely large scope - the majority of the gameplay design and systems already exist. Contracting the project out to an external studio means the publisher can just pay a flat amount and doesn't have to worry about things hiring new people, handling benefits, setting up the studio, etc. The external studio gets to do that, and often has their own stuff in place already. This works very well for the independent studios too - they can take jobs like this in order to pay the bills and fund their own game development. Behaviour, independent developer of Dead by Daylight, also has a second team that does work like porting and remakes/ports for other studios. Their porting and remake team provides the income to keep the studio afloat during leaner times.

Second, it allows the publisher to give these external studios a chance to prove themselves - can they deliver a promised project in time, budget, and quality? If they can, this studio may be worth acquiring or working with again. The Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom was developed by Japanese independent studio Grezzo, but this is far from their first game for Nintendo. They ported Ocarina of Time 3D, Majora's Mask 3D, and Luigi's Mansion for the 3DS, and they did the port for Link's Awakening to the Switch. The team that built Sonic Mania first proved themselves to Sega by doing iOS ports of Sonic CD, Sonic 1, and Sonic 2 before being given the Sonic Mania project.

With these two reasons in mind, doing remakes/ports do two things. First, they can earn money to pay the bills in a situation where it isn't worth it for the publishers to build them internally, allowing these studios to build their own projects or just have a more stable sustainable situation. Second, it provides a "minor league" situation where these external studios can prove their ability to the publisher in a lower-stakes situation in order to be entrusted with a higher and more interesting project later. As long as remakes and ports of games continue to do well, this kind of work will be in demand.

[Join us on Discord] and/or [Support us on Patreon]

Got a burning question you want answered?

Short questions: Ask a Game Dev on Twitter

Long questions: Ask a Game Dev on Tumblr

Frequent Questions: The FAQ

[cerinslair]

Heart Heist: The Zine Update 1.1 Out Now!

While work on the Complete Edition continues, Heart Heist: The Zine has also received its first major update!

Now that I understand itch's platform a bit better - as well as the scope of this project - it no longer seems correct to update the zine itself directly into the Complete Edition. I think it makes more sense to split Heart Heist into two bespoke editions: the cheap, easy to distribute, lowest-possible-barrier-of-entry Zine Edition; and a Complete Edition that is free to grow into whatever it ends up becoming. I don't want anyone who supported this project already to feel cheated out of the Complete Edition, which is why anyone who purchased (or purchases) the Zine Edition on itch will get $5 (the full price of the zine) off of the Complete Edition when it releases.

This does not mean that the zine is an unfinished version of a full game. Now it is quite the opposite - it is its own, complete thing (and has had its release stats on itch updated accordingly). It has everything you need to play, and can stand on its own. Some might come to call it a "rules-lite" version, and while I don't want to fall into the rabbit hole of definitions, it is looking very likely that the Complete Edition will have at least three more mechanics than its zine counterpart. Some players might even come to prefer one version over the other - relative simplicity and ease of use vs. mechanical depth and additional useful tools. Only time and continued development will tell.

While the Zine Edition obviously won't have everything the Complete Edition will have in it, it will still benefit from some of the updates work on the Complete Edition produces - such as the changes that released today!

Thank you for continuing to support Heart Heist!

Changelog:

Created a Google Sheet that helps automate calculating each Thief's Favor at the end of the game if you don't feel like doing math

Updated estimated play time based on additional playtesting with more groups of different players - down from 5 or 6 to 4 hours!

Added expectation of an additional 30 to 60 minutes if the entire group is new to playing Heart Heist

Added section strongly encouraging players to read their intel before meeting up to save time at the table. This section also explains that heists cannot be "spoiled," and are reusable!

The Evocative Language Update

"Stats" → "Vibes"

"Game Master" → "The Guy in the Van" (GV)

Removed unnecessary references to upcoming material meant for the Complete Edition

Rephrased explanation of "Fake It 'til you Make It" for clarity

Fixed unspecified print error on page 5

Added missing paragraph break on page 9

Fixed various typos

Removed grey sketch line from corner of Bingo.png

Fixed missing Alt Text for Bingo.png

Clarified that armor counts as a set of clothes

Specified how long it takes for a glass cutter to cut holes of various sizes

Reduced cost of the Aptitude spell from 3 to 2 Favor

Added advice for players to - at minimum - figure out how they will get in, how they will acquire the target, and how they will get back out again within their planning time limit. You'd be surprised how many groups forget one of those three things!

Added reminder for the Guy in the Van to award bonus Favor for the Dragon's Patron effect at the end of Phase 2: The Plan

Various tweaks to The Princess in the Box example heist based on continued playtesting

Added a timeline overview of the heist to The Princess in the Box

Increased margin size of The Princess in the Box intel handout for easier note taking

Updated the titles of some of the art pieces in the credits

[beardedmrbean]

As he vowed to do on X, Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Roseville, on Wednesday announced he is introducing legislation to eliminate federal funding for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which seeks to build a high-speed rail line from Los Angeles to San Francisco.

The line would start with the much more modest route of Merced to Bakersfield.

The project has already spent around $6.8 billion in federal dollars and is seeking an additional $8 billion from the U.S. government. Kiley’s bill would make the California high-speed rail project ineligible for any further federal funding.

Kiley is working in tandem with billionaires Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, both of whom were tapped by President-elect Donald Trump to co-chair a Department of Government Efficiency.

The DOGE, as they are calling it, isn’t really a department, and any recommendations they make would have to be approved by both Trump and the GOP-controlled Congress, but it does have a goal to eliminate vast swaths of federal spending and bureaucracy.

In a statement Wednesday, Kiley called the California high-speed rail project a failure due to “political ineptitude,” and added that “there is no plausible scenario where the cost to federal or state taxpayers can be justified.”

“Our share of federal transportation funding should go towards real infrastructure needs, such as improving roads that rank among the worst in the country,” he said.

Kiley sits on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, which is controlled by Republicans who long have been critical of the project. Should Kiley’s bill pass the House, it would also need to be approved by the Senate, where Republicans hold a 53-seat majority, and be signed by Trump.

That’s likely to be difficult, though, because it would probably take 60 votes to limit debate and both of California’s U.S. senators are Democrats.

The Bee has reached out to the California High-Speed Rail Authority for comment.

In a previous statement to The Bee, authority spokesperson Toni Tinoco said that the agency “continues to make significant progress.”

Tinoco pointed out that the project has been environmentally cleared for all but 31 miles between L.A. and San Francisco, making the project “shovel-ready for future phases of investment.”

Tinoco also pushed back against statements by Kiley and the DOGE about how the project has been beset by both delays (it was initially estimated to be complete by 2020) and massive cost overruns (ballooning from an initial cost estimate of $45 billion to as much as $127.9 billion).

“It did not account for inflation or any unknown scope, a lesson learned as our estimates now account for inflation and project scope, helping explain cost difference,” Tinoco wrote.

[sdgreenbuilders]

How to Choose the Right ADU Contractor Near Me

When considering building an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on your property, one of the most crucial decisions you will make is choosing the right contractor. The success of your ADU project depends on the contractor's experience, professionalism, and alignment with your project goals. But how do you choose the right one? Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to select a qualified ADU contractor near me, with a focus on what makes Green Builders General Contractors a great choice.

1. Understand Your Needs and Project Scope

Before you even begin looking for a contractor, it’s essential to have a clear understanding of your ADU project. What is the size of your planned ADU? Do you need a full remodel or just a new structure? Knowing your project’s scope will help you communicate effectively with contractors and choose one with the right expertise. ADUs come in various styles, from detached units to garage conversions, so you’ll need someone who can handle the specific needs of your project.

2. Look for Local Expertise

When you search for an "ADU contractor near me," you want to prioritize contractors familiar with local building codes, zoning regulations, and permit processes. The right contractor will be able to navigate the often complex legalities of adding an ADU to your property. Local experience is key here, as contractors who are familiar with the area's rules will make the process smoother, faster, and less stressful.

Why Green Builders?

Green Builders General Contractors has deep knowledge of local regulations and zoning laws, ensuring your ADU project is fully compliant with the required codes. They specialize in designing and building ADUs that meet not only your needs but also your city’s requirements.

3. Check Reviews and References

A reliable contractor will have a strong reputation in the community. Before hiring an ADU contractor, take the time to read online reviews and ask for references. Past clients can provide valuable insight into the contractor's reliability, communication skills, and the quality of their work. Don’t hesitate to contact previous clients to inquire about their experience, the project timeline, and the contractor’s ability to stick to budgets.

Why Green Builders?

Green Builders has a solid reputation for delivering high-quality results on time and within budget. They encourage potential clients to speak with their previous customers to verify their work ethic and professionalism.

4. Verify Licensing and Insurance

Ensure the contractor you hire is fully licensed and insured. This protects you, the homeowner, in case of any mishaps during construction. A licensed contractor meets the necessary legal requirements, while insurance ensures that you won’t be held financially responsible for accidents that happen on the job site.

Why Green Builders?

Green Builders General Contractors is fully licensed and insured, offering peace of mind knowing that your ADU project is in safe hands. They follow the highest industry standards for both safety and quality.

5. Consider Their Sustainability Practices

With the growing focus on environmental sustainability, you may want to consider a contractor who incorporates green building practices into their work. Green Builders, for example, specializes in energy-efficient designs, sustainable materials, and eco-friendly construction practices. Choosing a contractor who prioritizes sustainability can lead to long-term cost savings and a more environmentally friendly home.

Why Green Builders?

Green Builders General Contractors takes pride in their sustainable approach, using energy-efficient materials and green construction methods that will help reduce the carbon footprint of your ADU while keeping utility costs low.

6. Get Multiple Estimates

It’s essential to get at least three estimates from different contractors to compare costs, timelines, and services. While the lowest bid might seem appealing, don’t sacrifice quality for price. Consider the overall value, which includes quality of work, customer service, and project management.

Why Green Builders?

Green Builders provides free consultations and estimates, giving you a clear breakdown of costs, timelines, and project deliverables. They work with clients to ensure the project fits within budget while maintaining the highest standards of quality.

7. Communication is Key

A successful ADU project relies heavily on clear, consistent communication between you and your contractor. From the initial consultation to the final walkthrough, make sure the contractor is approachable and open to your ideas and concerns. A good contractor will keep you updated on progress and any changes that arise.

Why Green Builders?

Green Builders General Contractors are known for their transparent communication. They work closely with clients throughout the entire process, ensuring you’re always in the loop.

Conclusion

Choosing the right ADU contractor is a significant step toward building your dream accessory dwelling unit. By considering factors like local expertise, reviews, licensing, sustainability, and communication, you can ensure a smooth and successful project. Green Builders General Contractors stands out as a top choice for those looking for quality, reliability, and eco-friendly solutions for their ADU needs.

If you’re ready to take the next step in your ADU journey, reach out to Green Builders for a consultation and see how they can bring your vision to life.

[khalid-albeshri]

Top Construction Project Challenges:

1. Cost Overruns: Due to inaccurate estimates and scope changes.

2. Schedule Delays: Caused by weather, material delays, and labor shortages.

3. Labor Shortages: Lead to delays and higher costs.

4. Design Errors: Result in rework and increased costs.

5. Regulatory Issues: Cause delays and legal complications.

6. Safety Risks: Lead to injuries and project delays.

7. Environmental Concerns: Require redesigns and delay projects.

8. Supply Chain Disruptions: Delay projects and raise costs.

9. Stakeholder Conflicts: Lead to disputes and delays.

10. Technology Integration: Resistance causes inefficiencies.

11. Risk Management: Poor planning leads to project failures.

12. Quality Control: Results in rework and legal issues.

13. Scope Creep: Causes budget overruns and delays.

14. Communication Breakdown: Leads to mistakes and conflicts.

15. Financial Management: Poor cash flow causes project stoppages.

- Mitigation: Effective planning, communication, risk management, and quality control are essential.

#KhalidAlbeshri #خالدالبشري

[arcticdementor]

"There is some discussion of cost disease around here. Scott wrote a bit about it. May I present its cousin: schedule disease. There is a particularly silly recent example. The city of Pasadena in California has a project to bury some power lines. That's the sort of thing you expect a local government to do. There are various benefits to buried power lines. All good so far. Not obviously silly or indicative of a broad societal failure. Guess what the estimated schedule will be? This is a town of 133k people. 23 square miles. The scope of this project is small. Take your best guess and check the spoiler below. 400 years.  https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2019/02/05/with-no-consensus-pasadenas-underground-utility-program-to-continue-despite-imperfections/ The city government website had a 400 year timeline, but they are buzzkills and removed it two days ago due to criticism. Screenshot here: https://imgur.com/a/oT82UMD City website that has been "updated for clarification" by deleting the schedule: https://pwp.cityofpasadena.net/undergroundfaqs/#footnote Not that they plan to do it faster, they merely deleted the schedule from the website. We used to be able to build things. Infrastructure. Nuclear power plants. Trains. The California high speed train project is a much more impactful example of cost and schedule disease. But this Pasadena buried power line project stands out for the combination of small scope and deranged schedule."

—TIRM

[lastimeexteriors-nebraska]

What is the Typical Cost per Square Foot for Asphalt Roofing?

If you're considering upgrading your home’s roof, you're likely wondering about costs. After all, your roof is not just a protective layer over your head; it adds value to your home and contributes to its overall aesthetic. In this article, we’ll break down the typical cost per square foot for asphalt roofing, guiding you through factors affecting pricing and providing tips on working with an asphalt roofing contractor.

The Basics of Asphalt Roofing

Asphalt roofing is one of the most popular choices for homeowners nationwide due to its affordability, durability, and versatility. Before diving into costs, it's essential to understand the types of asphalt roofing available. The two main types are:

3-Tab Asphalt Shingles: These are the most budget-friendly option, featuring a simple, flat design. They typically have a lifespan of around 20 years.

Architectural Shingles: These are thicker and are designed to mimic the look of more expensive materials. Although they come at a higher price point, their lifespan can reach 30 years or more, making them a worthwhile investment.

Factors Influencing the Cost of Asphalt Roofing

When assessing the cost of asphalt roofing, several factors come into play:

1. Type of Shingle

The type of asphalt shingle you choose significantly impacts the overall cost. Standard 3-tab shingles typically range from $90 to $100 per square (one square equals 100 square feet), while architectural shingles might cost between $120 to $150 per square.

2. Quality and Brand

Different manufacturers offer varying levels of quality. Higher-end brands may come with longer warranties and better performance, which can justify their increased price.

3. Roof Size and Complexity

The total area of your roof and its complexity—like the number of slopes, valleys, and chimneys—will influence installation costs. A more complex roof design may require additional labor and materials, increasing the price.

4. Location

Your geographical location will also play a role in the overall cost. Areas with a higher cost of living or a shortage of roofing contractors may see increased prices. Additionally, local building codes and regulations may affect material choice and labor costs.

Average Cost per Square Foot

On average, the total cost for asphalt roofing ranges from $3.50 to $5.50 per square foot. This estimate typically includes both materials and installation.

Low-End Estimate: For basic 3-tab shingles, expect to pay around $3.50 per square foot.

High-End Estimate: For architectural shingles, costs can rise to about $5.50 per square foot, especially considering the installation's added complexity.

Working with an Asphalt Roofing Contractor

Finding a qualified asphalt roofing contractor can make all the difference in your roofing project. Here are some tips for selecting the right professional:

1. Check Credentials

Ensure that the contractor holds the necessary licenses and insurance. This protects you in case of accidents or damage during installation.

2. Ask for References

A reputable contractor should be willing to provide references from previous clients. Take the time to contact these references and ask about their experiences.

3. Get Multiple Quotes

Always obtain quotes from several contractors to compare prices and services. This process allows you to gauge the market rate and select the best fit for your budget and needs.

4. Review the Contract Carefully

Before signing, ensure the contract includes all details about the scope of work, materials used, timeline, and payment structure. Having everything in writing helps avoid misunderstandings later on.

Why Choose Asphalt Roofing?

Asphalt roofing offers several benefits that make it a popular choice for homeowners:

Affordability: Asphalt shingles are often the most budget-friendly option compared to other roofing materials.

Variety: Available in numerous styles and colors, asphalt shingles can easily complement any home design.

Energy Efficiency: Many asphalt shingles come with reflective coatings, making them energy-efficient, especially in hotter climates.

Conclusion

Understanding the typical cost per square foot for asphalt roofing helps you plan your budget effectively. With costs ranging from $3.50 to $5.50 per square foot, you can decide based on your roofing needs.

Whether you opt for basic 3-tab shingles or invest in architectural shingles, working with a reliable asphalt roofing contractor ensures a successful installation. Remember, taking the time to research and plan can save you money and stress in the long run.

Ready to enhance your home with a new roof? Visit Lastime Exteriors today to explore our services and learn more about energy-efficient roofing solutions tailored to your needs. Let us help protect your investment while boosting your home’s curb appeal!

[asestimationsconsultants]

Residential vs. Commercial | Comparing Construction Estimating Services in Australia

Construction estimating services play a vital role in both residential and commercial projects across Australia. However, the scope, challenges, and approaches differ significantly between these two sectors. Understanding these differences helps project stakeholders choose the right estimating services tailored to their specific needs.

Scope and Complexity

Residential construction estimating typically involves smaller-scale projects such as single-family homes, renovations, or small multi-unit dwellings. These projects usually have simpler designs and fewer trade specialties. Estimators focus on detailed takeoffs for common materials, labor costs, and basic site works.

Commercial estimating covers a wider range of larger, more complex projects such as office buildings, retail centers, hospitals, and schools. These projects often involve sophisticated architectural designs, multiple subcontractors, specialized systems (like HVAC, fire safety), and stricter regulatory compliance. Estimators must account for more variables, higher volumes, and longer timelines.

Estimating Methodologies

Residential estimating often relies on unit rate pricing for standard materials and labor. Estimators typically use detailed plans combined with historical cost data. Because residential projects have shorter durations, estimates may be less layered with contingencies.

Commercial estimating requires more detailed cost planning, including allowances for escalation, complex subcontractor bids, phased construction, and regulatory fees. Advanced software and BIM integration are more common to manage the complexity.

Regulatory and Compliance Considerations

Residential projects must comply with local building codes and standards, but commercial projects face more extensive requirements including fire safety, accessibility, environmental standards, and often more rigorous council approvals. Estimators working on commercial projects need to factor these compliance costs into their estimates.

Risk and Contingency Management

The scale and complexity of commercial construction introduce higher risks related to delays, design changes, and cost escalations. Estimators typically include larger contingencies and conduct detailed risk assessments. Residential projects may have smaller contingencies but still require allowances for unexpected site conditions.

Client Interaction and Reporting

Residential clients often require more straightforward estimates with clear explanations as they may be less familiar with construction processes. Commercial clients expect detailed cost breakdowns, phased estimates, and ongoing updates aligned with project milestones.

FAQs

Are estimating services priced differently for residential vs commercial projects? Yes, commercial estimating is usually more expensive due to complexity and detail required.

Can the same estimator work on both residential and commercial projects? Some estimators specialize, but many have experience across sectors.

Is commercial estimating software different from residential? Commercial estimators often use more advanced software with BIM integration capabilities.

How do contingencies differ between residential and commercial estimates? Commercial projects typically include higher contingencies due to greater risk and complexity.

Are regulatory fees always included in commercial estimates? Yes, professional commercial estimates factor in relevant regulatory and compliance costs.

Conclusion

Residential and commercial construction estimating services in Australia differ significantly in scope, methodology, complexity, and client expectations. Understanding these distinctions helps project stakeholders select the appropriate estimating expertise and tools. Both require accuracy and professionalism, but commercial projects demand more detailed planning, risk management, and compliance considerations. Choosing the right estimating service ensures realistic budgets and smoother project delivery in either sector.

[interiordecorationideas]

How to Choose the Right Interior Designer in Ranchi for Your Home

Ranchi, the capital city of Jharkhand, is a blend of traditional charm and modern living. As more people in Ranchi aspire to create beautiful and functional homes, the demand for skilled interior designers has grown significantly.

Choosing the right interior designer can make all the difference in transforming your house into your dream home.

Here's a comprehensive guide to help you select the perfect interior designer in Ranchi for your home.

10 Reasons to Hire an Interior Designer in Ranchi

1. Define Your Style and Needs

Before starting your search, it’s essential to have a clear idea of your style preferences and requirements. Are you leaning towards a contemporary design, a traditional look, or a fusion of both? Do you have specific functional needs for your home? Having a well-defined vision will help you communicate effectively with potential designers and ensure they align with your expectations.

Tips:

Browse design magazines, websites, or platforms like Pinterest for inspiration.

Make a list of your must-haves, such as storage solutions, color schemes, or specific materials.

2. Research Local Designers

Ranchi boasts a growing community of talented interior designers who cater to a range of styles and budgets. Start by compiling a list of potential designers through online searches, social media platforms, and recommendations from friends or family. Look for designers with a strong portfolio and positive client reviews.

Where to Look:

Google searches for “interior designers in Ranchi.”

Social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook.

Local design exhibitions or events.

Recommendations from your network.

3. Evaluate Portfolios and Experience

Once you have a list of potential designers, delve into their portfolios. This will give you a glimpse of their style, creativity, and versatility. Check if they have experience handling projects similar to yours, whether it’s a small apartment, a luxury villa, or a renovation project.

Questions to Ask:

Do they have experience with homes in Ranchi’s climate and culture?

Are their designs functional and aesthetically pleasing?

Have they worked with projects similar in size and scope to yours?

4. Set a Budget

Interior design services can range from affordable to high-end, depending on the designer’s expertise and the complexity of the project. Establishing a budget upfront will help you narrow down your options and avoid unexpected expenses.

Budgeting Tips:

Discuss fees and payment structures early on.

Ask for a detailed estimate, including design, materials, and labor costs.

Be transparent about your budget constraints.

5. Meet and Communicate

Schedule consultations with shortlisted designers to understand their approach, personality, and working style. Effective communication is key to a successful partnership. A good designer should be open to your ideas, provide constructive feedback, and adapt their plans to meet your needs.

Key Points to Discuss:

Your vision and preferences.

Their design process and timeline.

Potential challenges and solutions.

6. Check References and Reviews

Speak with previous clients to gain insights into the designer’s reliability, professionalism, and ability to meet deadlines. Online reviews and testimonials can also provide valuable information about their reputation.

Questions for References:

Were you satisfied with the final design?

Did the designer stay within budget and timeline?

How was their problem-solving ability?

7. Verify Credentials and Licenses

While creativity is crucial, professional qualifications and credentials also matter. Ensure the designer you choose is licensed and follows ethical practices. Membership in professional organizations like the Indian Institute of Interior Designers (IIID) can be a plus.

8. Consider Compatibility

Your interior designer will be a part of your home journey for weeks or even months. It’s important to choose someone you feel comfortable working with and who understands your lifestyle and personality.

Traits to Look For:

Good listener.

Adaptability and flexibility.

Strong problem-solving skills.

9. Focus on Sustainability

As sustainability becomes increasingly important, consider designers who incorporate eco-friendly practices and materials. Many designers in Ranchi now offer solutions that are both stylish and environmentally responsible.

Sustainable Options:

Use of local materials to reduce carbon footprint.

Energy-efficient lighting and appliances.

Designs that maximize natural light and ventilation.

10. Finalize a Contract

Before starting the project, ensure all terms are documented in a detailed contract. This should include the scope of work, timeline, payment schedule, and any other agreed-upon terms. A clear contract helps prevent misunderstandings and ensures a smooth collaboration.

Conclusion:

Choosing the right interior designer in Ranchi is a crucial step in turning your house into a home. By following these tips, you can find a professional who shares your vision, respects your budget, and delivers a design that perfectly reflects your personality and lifestyle. Take your time, do thorough research, and trust your instincts to make the best choice. Your dream home awaits!

[helpfulinsightsolutionblog]

How to Hire a Dedicated Development Team?

If you're like most startup founders, you wear a lot of hats. One day, you're focused on marketing and the next, you're deep in code. At some point, you realize you can't do it all and decide it's time to hire some help. But, how do you go about hiring a dedicated development team? 

In this article, we'll explore how to hire a app developer in USA. We'll discuss what to look for in potential candidates and how to assess their skills. We'll also touch on the importance of building a good rapport with your team and creating a work environment that encourages collaboration and creativity.

Define your development needs

When hiring a dedicated development team, it is important to first define your development needs. This will help ensure that you hire the right team with the right skillset to meet your specific needs.

1.Some things to consider when defining your development needs include:

2. What type of Dedicated Developers do you need? (e.g. web, mobile, etc.)

3. What platforms or technologies do you need the development team to be skilled in?

4. What is the scope of the project? (e.g. what features or functionality do you need to be developed?)

5. What is your budget for the project?

Once you have a clear idea of your development needs, you can start the process of hiring a dedicated development team or Dedicated Developers. There are a few different ways to go about this, such as using a development agency or hiring freelance developers

When using a development agency, you will need to provide them with a detailed brief of your project requirements. The agency will then match you with a team of developers who have the skills and experience needed to complete your project.

If you decide to hire freelance developers, you can post your project on a freelancing platform such as Upwork or Freelancer.com. From there, developers will be able to bid on your project and you can choose who you want to work with based on their proposal, price, and portfolio.

Hiring a dedicated development team can be a great way to get your project developed quickly and efficiently. By taking the time to define your development needs upfront, you can ensure that you end up with the right team for the job.

Read Also:- Top 10 iPhone App Development Companies in USA 2025

Research and identify potential development teams

When looking for a dedicated development team, it is important to do your research and identify potential options. One way to do this is to look for online portfolios or case studies that show the team’s work. You can also read reviews or testimonials from past clients to get a sense of their quality of work and customer service. Once you have a few potential teams in mind, reach out and get quotes to compare costs. Make sure to also ask about the team’s process, communication, and project management methods to ensure a smooth collaboration.

It is also important to consider the size of the team when making your decision. A smaller team may be more affordable, but they may also have less capacity to handle a large project. On the other hand, a larger team may be more expensive but they will likely be able to handle a more complex development project. Ultimately, it is important to identify your needs and budget when choosing a development team.

Consider cost, location and timezone

When looking to hire a dedicated development team or dedicated developers, there are a few key considerations to keep in mind: cost, location and timezone.

Cost is always an important consideration when outsourcing any kind of work, and development work is no different. Make sure to get an estimate from several different providers before making a decision.

Location can be important for a number of reasons. If you want your team to be easily accessible, then hiring a team in your timezone may be a priority. Similarly, if you want to tap into a specific talent pool or be closer to certain target markets, then choosing a provider in those locations may make sense.

Finally, timezone can be a key factor in ensuring smooth communication and collaboration between you and your team. If there is a significant time difference, it may be worth considering a provider who offers flexible hours or who is willing to work in your timezone.

Read Also:- How Much Does It Cost To Develop A Fantasy Sports App?

When looking to hire a dedicated development team, there Evaluate team's skills and portfolio

When evaluating a potential development team's skills and portfolio, there are a few key things to look for. Firstly, does the team or Dedicated Developers have experience in developing the type of project you are looking to create? Secondly, do they have a strong portfolio of previous work that showcases their skills and ability to complete complex projects? Lastly, are they able to provide references or testimonials from previous clients? These are all important factors to consider when choosing a development team.

In addition to the above factors, it is also important to consider the team's size and structure. Are they a large team with many different specialties, or a small team of generalists? What is their project management process like? How do they communicate with clients? These are all important factors to consider when choosing a development team.

Another important factor to consider is the team's location. If you are looking to develop a project for a global market, it is important to choose a team that has experience working with international clients. Conversely, if you are looking to develop a project for a local market, it is important to choose a team that is familiar with the local market and culture. 

Finally, it is important to consider your budget when choosing a development team. Make sure to get quotes from multiple teams and compare their prices. It is also important to consider the value you are getting for your money. Choose a team that you feel confident will be able to deliver a high-quality product within your budget.

Interview the team and ask for references

When interviewing a potential dedicated development team, be sure to ask for references from previous clients. This will give you an idea of the team's work ethic and quality of work. Also, be sure to interview each member of the team to get a feel for their individual skill sets.

The team's work ethic is very important, as you want to make sure that they are dedicated to delivering the best possible product. The quality of work is also important, as you want to be sure that the team you are hiring is capable of delivering a high-quality product. Each member of the team should be interviewed so that you can get a feel for their individual skillsets. This way, you can be sure that you are hiring a team that has the necessary skills to deliver a high-quality product.

Read Also:-What is The Role of AI in the Real Estate Industry?

Make your decision and get started

When you're ready to hire a dedicated development team, there are a few things to keep in mind. First, decide what kind of team you need. Do you need a full-stack team or a specific skill set? Once you know what you need, you can start your search.

There are a few different ways to find dedicated developers. You can use online job boards, such as Upwork or Freelancer. You can also use your personal or professional network. If you know someone who knows someone who might be a good fit for your team, ask for a referral. Finally, you can use a development agency.

When you're interviewing potential team members, it's important to ask about their experience and skills. You should also ask about their availability and whether they're willing to work on a project for an extended period of time. Once you've found a team you're happy with, it's time to get to work!

Conclusion

In conclusion, if you are looking to hire a dedicated development team there are a few key things to keep in mind. First, make sure to clearly communicate your project requirements. Next, take the time to interview multiple candidates to find the right fit for your team. Finally, create a detailed contract that outlines the expectations and deliverables for both parties. By following these steps, you can ensure a successful partnership with your dedicated development team.

If you're not sure where to start when looking for a dedicated development team, consider using a freelancer platform like Upwork. On Upwork, you can post your project requirements and receive bids from freelancers who are interested in working on your project. You can then interview candidates and choose the freelancer you want to work with.

[constructioncostco]

Planning and estimating construction projects are crucial to their success. There are many complex processes involved. As part of this process, construction takeoffs are essential. Construction takeoffs are itemized and quantified lists of the materials, labor, and other resources required for construction projects.

Construction takeoffs are essential to project estimation, planning, and success in general. They give a thorough analysis of the necessary labor, materials, and resources, allowing for precise cost estimation and efficient project management. With enhanced accuracy and time savings, the process has been further streamlined with the introduction of digital takeoff tools and BIM-based solutions.

Importance of Construction Takeoffs

Accurate project estimation

Accurate project estimation is built on the foundation of construction takeoffs. Takeoffs give project stakeholders a thorough grasp of the project scope and associated costs by estimating the materials, equipment, and labor required. Realistic timetables and budgets can be created with the use of this information.

Enhanced project planning

A crucial aspect of project planning is takeoffs. Construction teams may create accurate project timetables, manage resources wisely, and spot potential bottlenecks or areas that need extra care with a full assessment of the available resources. This degree of planning ensures that the construction process runs more smoothly and helps to avoid delays and expensive change orders.

Improved communication and collaboration

Communication among project stakeholders is standardized by construction takeoffs. Takeoffs allow for simple and clear communication between architects, contractors, suppliers, and other team members by quantifying and clarifying requirements. This promotes teamwork and increases overall project efficiency by cutting down on ambiguity and errors.

Methods for Construction Takeoffs

Manual takeoffs

Traditional manual takeoffs entail looking at blueprints, plans, and specifications to manually calculate the amount of resources and materials needed. Even though it takes a lot of time and is prone to mistakes, this method is still employed occasionally, especially for smaller projects or when digital versions of certain details are not available.

Digital takeoff software

The building sector has undergone a change since the introduction of digital takeoff software. By eliminating laborious computations and lowering human error, these software solutions allow users to electronically measure quantities directly from digital designs. Software for digital takeoffs streamlines the process by providing features like annotation tools, automatic measurements, and simple cooperation.

3D modeling and BIM

The building sector has undergone a change since the introduction of digital takeoff software. By eliminating laborious computations and lowering human error, these software solutions allow users to electronically measure quantities directly from digital designs. Software for digital takeoffs streamlines the process by providing features like annotation tools, automatic measurements, and simple cooperation.

Read more

[mariacallous]

After decades of strategic drift and costly acquisition failures, the U.S. Navy is sailing straight into a storm it can’t avoid. Despite the Defense Department’s lip service about China being the “pacing challenge,” decades of deindustrialization and policymakers’ failure to prioritize among services and threats have left the Navy ill-equipped to endure a sustained high-intensity conflict in the Pacific. The United States is unable to keep pace with Chinese shipbuilding and will fall even further behind in the coming years. Where does that leave the U.S. Navy and the most critical U.S. foreign-policy imperative: deterring a war in the Pacific?

As evidenced by the Biden administration’s latest budget request, fiscal constraints are forcing the Navy to cut procurement requests, delay modernization programs, and retire ships early. The Navy’s budget for the 2025 fiscal year calls for decommissioning 19 ships—including three nuclear-powered attack submarines and four guided-missile cruisers—while procuring only six new vessels. The full scope of what military analysts have long warned would be the “Terrible ’20s” is now evident: The expensive upgrading of the U.S. nuclear triad, simultaneous modernization efforts across the services, and the constraint of rising government debt are compelling the Pentagon to make tough choices about what it can and cannot pay for.

Workforce shortages and supply chain issues are also limiting shipbuilding capacity. The defense industrial base is still struggling to recover from post-Cold War budget cuts that dramatically shrank U.S. defense manufacturing. The Navy needs more shipyard capacity, but finding enough qualified workers for the yards remains the biggest barrier to expanding production. The shipbuilding industry is struggling to attract talent, losing out to fast food restaurants that offer better pay and benefits for entry-level employees. At bottom, it is a lack of welders, not widgets, that must be overcome if the U.S. Navy is to grow its fleet.

Instead, the shipbuilding outlook is progressively worsening. An internal review ordered by Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro in January found that major programs, including submarines and aircraft carriers, face lengthy delays. Even the Constellation-class frigates, touted as a quick adaptation of a proven European design, are delayed by three years.

As defense analyst David Alman outlined in a prize-winning essay for the U.S. Naval Institute’s Proceedings, the United States simply can’t win a warship race with China. The United States effectively gave up on commercial shipbuilding during the Reagan administration in the name of free trade. In the decades that followed, generous state subsidies helped China dominate commercial shipbuilding, and Beijing’s requirement that the sector be dual-use resulted in an industry that can shift to production and ship repair for the military during a conflict, much as U.S. shipyards did during World War II. The U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence estimates that China now has 232 times the shipbuilding capacity of the United States. China built almost half the world’s new ships in 2022, whereas U.S. shipyards produced just 0.13 percent.

Rebuilding the arsenal of democracy that anchored the U.S. victory at sea 80 years ago won’t happen overnight or cheaply—it is a generational project. The 20-year Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program aimed at upgrading dry docks, facilities, and equipment will end up costing well over the projected $21 billion. But the plan is only intended to maximize existing U.S. industrial capacity and won’t do much to close the enormous shipbuilding gap with China. That would require a reconstitution program on par with the series of maritime laws passed after World War I, which supported the expansion of an industrial base eventually capable of turning out thousands of carriers, destroyers, submarines, frigates, and cargo ships for the Atlantic and Pacific fleets.

Realizing that U.S. shipyards are stretched thin, policymakers have begun looking abroad. Del Toro encouraged South Korean companies to invest in U.S. naval shipping during a visit this year. Japan will likely begin performing repair and maintenance work on U.S. warships soon; India agreed to do so last year. These initiatives will alleviate the increasing maintenance backlog at U.S. facilities, but it would take a large share of the combined Japanese and South Korean shipyard capacity to fundamentally alter the growing disparity between the U.S. and Chinese fleet size in the Western Pacific.

Ships are not all comparable, of course. U.S. warships are heavier and more capable than China’s, although a dearth of logistics vessels and sealift capability are major concerns. Still, the current era of missile warfare has magnified the importance of fleet size.

Without enough ships to match the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy, what can the United States do to maintain conventional deterrence in the Pacific and prevent war? At least two big things: buy missiles and cut back on missions.

First, to manage risk in the short term, the Navy and the other services need to rapidly procure more munitions—focusing on weapons and capabilities, not the platforms that carry them.

The Russia-Ukraine war has military planners thinking less about short, quick conflicts and more about long wars and their vast need for materiel. What holds for depleted stocks of land-based artillery also holds for many of the weapons needed for a war at sea. A much-publicized 2023 wargame conducted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies found that the United States would run out of its entire inventory of the key Long Range Anti-Ship Missile within the first few days of a war over Taiwan. Ramping up the procurement and production of these munitions, as well as Joint Strike Missiles, Standoff Land Attack Missiles, and Harpoon missiles will enable U.S. airpower to help even the odds in the Pacific.

Anti-ship systems operated by the Army and Marines could also complement the other services’ firepower. However, the deployment of ground-based missiles will require allies’ consent. To date, no Asian allies of the United States have volunteered to permanently host U.S. missile batteries, due to political sensitivities and the fact that these countries already have such weapons of their own.

Innovation and creativity could further augment U.S. naval power. Retired U.S. Marine Col. T.X. Hammes, a fellow at the National Defense University, has urged the Navy to convert commercial container ships into warships capable of launching missiles, which would add a tremendous volume of firepower at a bargain price. These “missile merchants” would also require significantly less manpower than traditional warships do, a major consideration given the Navy’s struggle to fill existing billets.

Policymakers also need to make hard choices and limit naval deployments. Though the Navy is shrinking, its missions aren’t. A high operational tempo, manpower shortfalls, and an aging fleet are fueling a readiness crisis that is burning out sailors and ships.

Addressing the readiness crisis requires taking a hard look at which missions are essential for U.S. security and which aren’t. As former Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work has written, since the fall of the Soviet Union, the Navy has spent 30 years prioritizing global presence over warfighting readiness. The deadly Pacific ship accidents in 2017 involving the USS Fitzgerald and USS John McCain were directly attributable to this unsustainable mania for global presence, according to a Navy review.

The preeminence of presence missions also has more subtle consequences. After 20 years of largely uncontested deployments to the Middle East, the U.S. Navy now has an opponent who shoots back: Yemen’s Houthis. But increased experience in missile and drone defense is outweighed by a deleterious drain on precision munitions. In the conflict with the Houthis, the Navy burned through more Tomahawk land attack missiles in one day than it purchased in all of 2023. Meanwhile, the Houthis can replace all equipment destroyed by U.S. attacks with just two shiploads from Iran, according to Gen. Michael Kurilla, the head of U.S. Central Command.

The costs of maintaining global presence are magnified by the state of Navy recruiting and retention. The service’s recruiting woes are undeniable. The Navy missed all of its recruiting goals in 2023, some by as much as 35 percent. The service projects a shortfall of 6,700 recruits this year, according to its chief personnel officer.

Like the rest of the all-volunteer force, unprecedented recruiting headwinds mean manpower shortages will remain a persistent challenge for the Navy. Absent any change in operational tempo, sailors will work harder, deploy more frequently, and leave the service in greater numbers—ensuring a downward spiral for both manning and readiness.

The United States can’t match the size of China’s fleet in the near or medium term. Deindustrialization, poor procurement choices, and a myopic fixation on the U.S. presence in the Middle East have seen to that. All that said, the U.S. Navy still retains several significant advantages in a potential conflict with China: submarine dominance, overall tonnage, blue-water experience, and support from capable allies. A major increase in joint munitions purchases and an end to the readiness drain of presence deployments to secondary theaters will enhance the Navy’s edge during the potential peak window for a Chinese move on Taiwan over the next decade. The alternative is grim. If conventional deterrence fails, it risks military defeat for the United States or something even more dangerous: nuclear confrontation between the world’s two superpowers.