19 | They/them | Jinx enthusiast | Mistynat truther | Abby Anderson defender | Arcane s2 hater | Certified yapper
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
‘it’s shauna’s fault mari’s dead!’ i’m sorry? who built the pit? who killed the goats to start the hunt? who rigged the cards? notice how none of that was shauna… mhm… that’s what i thought
246 notes
·
View notes
Text
"I mean, I would be furious if I went through all of that and wasn't even thought of to be the leader."
791 notes
·
View notes
Text
so sad adult tai hates shauna now because can you imagine how crazy the ill-advised, grief-fueled "i know this is a bad idea but i just need to feel good again after everything that's happened to me/us" post-van's death/jeff leaving sex scene could've gone
201 notes
·
View notes
Text
And then adding on to this, Natalie in the adult tl asking if shauna needs helps butchering Adam bc she KNOWS the feeling and she REALIZES that making shauna bare that burden alone was fucked up of them.
thinking about shauna listening to jackie talk about jeff like he never even mattered when shauna is pregnant with his baby because she just wanted something jackie had and wanted to be wanted by someone who wanted jackie and now jackie doesnt even care anymore and shauna is stuck with this forever. and then jackie dies and then the baby dies but not before shauna has to give birth to him in the wilderness in winter surrounded by people who eat the dead and now fucking jeff sadecki is the last thing she has of either of them and what the hell is she supposed to do with that? she's stuck with him forever.
thinking about shauna beating lottie almost all the way to death to get all of that rage out of her and then when that rage is out of her they give her a knife and tell her to slit natalie's throat, and then when natalie runs and shauna is let off the hook for one thing for once they give her the knife again and tell her to cut up javi, the closest thing to a baby, so they can eat him, and now she's stuck with this, too. and all that rage she burned off didn't go anywhere, really. it's still right there.
and then im thinking about shauna watching lottie and everybody else crown natalie the queen for virtue of not dying, which is the same thing everybody has been doing, except for jackie and the baby and javi who all took chunks of shauna with them and left her with nothing but a knife.
im thinking about shauna who watches everybody gossip and laugh through the springtime knowing that when winter comes she will be the person who will have to cut them all up one by one so the rest of them can live and its very easy to see why she isnt friends with any of them anymore by then. she looks at them and she sees cuts of meat and how is she supposed to look at anybody normally ever again after that?
and its cruel, of course it is, everything she does to coach ben. it's not his fault, it's not about him at all, really, except that he is exactly the problem. he's innocent. he judges them. he sees what they have had to do to survive and pretends he never profited from any of it. pretends to be above it, uninvolved. he judges them. he judges her.
and shauna needs complicity from these people. she needs somebody else to know what it feels like to hold the knife. she needs people to be stuck with those guilty votes forever. tai with the gun and melissa with the knife and natalie at the butcher's table so that she's not the only one. and so ben is the sacrifice.
i saw somebody say that shauna doesnt want natalie to have to feel the pain of butchering a person, thats why she puts the cloth over his face. but that's not true. she *needs* natalie to know the pain of it, the guilt of it, the weight. The cloth is a lie she told herself would make it easier but she knows that Natalie is about to know what the inside of this man's joints look like either way and that she's going to be stuck knowing that forever.
they are going to be rescued someday and everybody will say "we did what we had to do to survive" and shauna needs to not be the only one who really has to mean that when she says it. and i guess she has that now. or she's about to.
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
propoganda i am NOT falling for:
• lottienat
• shauna being the antler queen
• travis martinez hate
• akilah being dead
• excusing/ignoring doomcoming
• brushing off the racial implications of shauna’s actions in the finale
• taissa turner hate
• van being dead
141 notes
·
View notes
Text
I honestly don’t understand why there aren’t more people who, when given the platform to discuss minimum wage, don’t simply distill it to the simplest of facts:
A forty hour work week is considered full time.
It’s considered as such because it takes up the amount of time we as a society have agreed should be considered the maximum work schedule required of an employee. (this, of course, does not always bear out practically, but just follow me here)
A person working the maximum amount of time required should earn enough for that labor to be able to survive. Phrased this way, I doubt even most conservatives could effectively argue against it, and out of the mouth of someone verbally deft enough to dance around the pathos-based jabs conservative pundits like to use to avoid actually debating, it could actually get opps thinking.
Therefore, if an employee is being paid less than [number of dollars needed for the post-tax total to pay for the basic necessities in a given area divided by forty] per hour, they are being ripped off and essentially having their labor, productivity, and profit generation value stolen by their employer.
Wages are a business expense, and if a company cannot afford to pay for its labor, it is by definition a failing business. A company stealing labor to stay afloat (without even touching those that do so simply to increase profit margins and/or management/executive pay/bonuses) is no more ethical than a failing construction company breaking into a lumber yard and stealing wood.
Our goal as a society should be to protect each other, especially those that most need protection, not to subsidize failing businesses whose owners could quite well subsidize them on their own.
206K notes
·
View notes
Text
I honestly don’t understand why there aren’t more people who, when given the platform to discuss minimum wage, don’t simply distill it to the simplest of facts:
A forty hour work week is considered full time.
It’s considered as such because it takes up the amount of time we as a society have agreed should be considered the maximum work schedule required of an employee. (this, of course, does not always bear out practically, but just follow me here)
A person working the maximum amount of time required should earn enough for that labor to be able to survive. Phrased this way, I doubt even most conservatives could effectively argue against it, and out of the mouth of someone verbally deft enough to dance around the pathos-based jabs conservative pundits like to use to avoid actually debating, it could actually get opps thinking.
Therefore, if an employee is being paid less than [number of dollars needed for the post-tax total to pay for the basic necessities in a given area divided by forty] per hour, they are being ripped off and essentially having their labor, productivity, and profit generation value stolen by their employer.
Wages are a business expense, and if a company cannot afford to pay for its labor, it is by definition a failing business. A company stealing labor to stay afloat (without even touching those that do so simply to increase profit margins and/or management/executive pay/bonuses) is no more ethical than a failing construction company breaking into a lumber yard and stealing wood.
Our goal as a society should be to protect each other, especially those that most need protection, not to subsidize failing businesses whose owners could quite well subsidize them on their own.
206K notes
·
View notes
Text
Having ADHD is that your brain either feels like
Or


And it can switch in a matter of seconds.
231K notes
·
View notes
Text

*wokely* tell me what genitals you have, stranger i just met
74K notes
·
View notes
Text
i actually get a bit annoyed with people who get a bit annoyed when people say “sorry” in response to their bad news. “why are you apologizing you didn’t do anything :/” like okay well a) you don’t know that and actually yes i am the secret architect of all your woes and have been this whole time, way to refuse to acknowledge a woman (gender neutral)’s accomplishments. and b) we’re both fluent english speakers so you know perfectly well that “sorry” isn’t always an apology and is very commonly used as an expression of general regret or sympathy. not in this case, because i have been your secret nemesis for years, meticulously plotting your every misery, but, like, in general
87K notes
·
View notes
Text
maybe i like my tech a little bit inconvenient
158K notes
·
View notes
Text

day four of mistynat week— cliches / tropes
i did the angel / devil cliche except the roles are swapped since misty would definitely be the devil considering she broke the transponder, though, natalie comes off as “bad” or rebellious and misty gets like. good grades and stuff. so i decided to assign the roles very surface leveled and at first glance rather than what fits them more based on their character
59 notes
·
View notes
Text
correction: nat’s actually going to kiss misty and they're gonna use tongue

33 notes
·
View notes
Text
mistynat week starts tomorrow!!!!!;_;'!!_&;&!!_!$($(_$!&!_!_!!!!!!!!!!
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
Me when my work starts playing a super niche song that I heavily associate w mistynat🙂↕️🙂↕️🙂↕️
#yellowjackets#mistynat#natalie scatorccio#misty quigley#yellowjackets s3#misty x natalie#yellowjackets season 3 spoilers#misty x nat#nat scatorccio#yellowjackets s2
27 notes
·
View notes