I'll get back to posting polls soon. Just not feeling super well lately, which is always an understatement when I say it. Things are not good.
9 notes
路
View notes
Anon is off until I calm down. Cowards can reply to my posts with their grievances under a throwaway account if they really feel the need to talk.
4 notes
路
View notes
Fixed so that the wording doesn't come off as accidentally biphobic/aphobic, and the "no" option was added because I'm a dummy and forgot it!
17 notes
路
View notes
Bisexuals who are not biromantic or vice versa are also Fully Bi. Aphobe, Biphobe.
Thank you for that. The wording was bad on that poll and I hadn't realized it until I had posted it. The wording should have been "bi across all forms of attraction."
However, this is not how to be an ally or how to call out behaviors in your own community. You cannot assume everything is in bad faith, especially from your own peers. You don't need to talk to me the same way you'd talk to some queerphobic bigot.
Poll got fucked up. I fucked up. I was more than willing to redo the poll with no problem. And, in fact, I will. I forgot the "no" option anyway, which was another really stupid idea on my part.
(I am also aspec in some ways but much less likely to talk about it now. So there's that.)
4 notes
路
View notes
*This is just about the flag. It's okay if you like the flag but the creator is bad.
12 notes
路
View notes
:O ! The queue ran out!
5 notes
路
View notes
*For example, someone might use ve/ver for one gender and he/him for the other, depending on the day.
**Same thing as above, but multiple sets. Maybe you use ae/aer, it/its, and paw/paws for one gender, but use they/them and ze/hir for the other.
7 notes
路
View notes
*These will specifically be ambiguous genders, uingenders, genders related to indifference, or genders that are gray/fuzzy/blurry/confusing. Please keep the replies within this sort of context!
6 notes
路
View notes
*medical professional. Typo!
7 notes
路
View notes