boycottthetestaments

[boycottthetestaments]

📌 Testimony Tuesday

✍️ Anonymous Submission

This week’s testimony comes from a longtime Osblaine fan who, like so many of us, found solace and strength in Nick and June’s story. Their relationship was more than a ship, it was a safe space during an incredibly difficult time. The anticipation for Season 6 was real, filled with hope, excitement, and endless speculation about how their story might evolve.

But what unfolded felt like a betrayal. The choices made in the final season contradicted everything that had been carefully built across six years and strayed from the spirit of both the show and the source material. It left this fan in disbelief, questioning whether they ever should have invested in the series at all.

And yet, that love for Nick and Osblaine remains. It’s not something that can be taken away by a poorly written season. That’s why this fan has joined the boycott of The Testaments. Not out of spite, but out of principle, to hold the writers and producers accountable for the damage they caused to a story that meant so much to so many.

They’re standing with us, not just in protest, but in solidarity, for narrative truth, for character integrity, and for Max Minghella, who deserved better.

📣 Your story matters. Every voice we amplify pushes back against the revisionist framing that tries to tell us we imagined it all. We didn’t. We saw the love, the sacrifice, the resistance. And we won’t forget.

[boycottthetestaments]

Pulled together more of my rambling train station of thoughts RE: the THT/Nick matter (as so many of us are still trying to do in order to make sense of the trainwreck that THT ended up being in the end🥂)

You know, I want to start by saying...I've DEEPLY disliked characters before, but never once have I felt compelled to track down their fans just to preach about how morally superior I am for misreading the plight or arc of those said fictional characters. That kind of self-important grandstanding (usually built on vibes and not receipts - imo) just screams "projection."

And that crash landing ending? (lol didn't intend the pun but certainly keeping it) - that wasn't nuanced critique or character work; it was a loud, lazy display of “performative political solidarity” that read well to people who didn't/don't/won't engage with the work beyond a superficial "what happens next week" basis.

Meanwhile, detail-obsessed fans were left blinking in confusion while watching Nick Blaine, a canonically subversive character, get rewritten into a narrative scapegoat. And this all coming from the Hollywood bubble, wrapped either in moral absolutism or in Dianetics/LRH’s bottled sweat/imaginary alien overlords (I mean…I guess ¿porque no los dos?).

But none of it touched the reality of how real-world resistance actually works.. successful resistance efforts rarely include heroic bull-in-a-china-shop suspend-your-belief-in-logic singular action moments. Success is yielded from teamwork, working together in perhaps a few big ways but many more small ways towards reaching the common goal of true equality. This last season also did no favors as it pertains to increasing the awareness about current human rights atrocities nor in increasing the awareness about the slippery slope that the US was beginning to find itself in even at the time that Season 6 began filming (FDT hadn't "won" yet but the writing was clearly on the wall.)

All it was was glass mansions. With a megaphone. Expecting applause.

(And btw, record yourselves applauding please!)

The accusation that us as fans “just didn’t understand” is exquisitely rich, because it became painfully obvious once the existing source material ran out around the end of Season 2, that the creatives themselves didn't even understand the show they were making.

Season 3 was my early warning sound off (wish I’d trusted it), and by the start of Season 5, it was crystal clear- this team was wildly underqualified to develop an original narrative that could even begin to touch what Atwood set them up with.

I voluntarily relinquished my "loyal-AF-viewer-tuning-in-right-at-11pm-cst-on-Monday-night" membership card around the start of Season 5, Episode 1- as Game of Thrones had given me trust issues..and I didn't even care half as much about those characters as I did for most of the characters in the HMT.

Something inside me felt really ick about the wedding ring reveal of Season 4, without a character to even go along with the ring.. it was haphazard and the explanations for it made no sense. I hate to say my instincts were right to begin pulling away immediately... but of course I always held out hope that someone competent would find a way to land the thing, and I figured I'd just go back and catch up once it was all over.

But I digress...

When you have even the actors (hey Max Minghella) side-eying their characters' choices and wondering if there perhaps were darker sides to them that over a span of six seasons/8-9 years, that they were never told about..or in retrospect now perhaps feel a little insecure about, like they magically should've diduced that darkness from nothingness..?

Well, in that case, we're no longer talking about art, and instead discussing the glaring slow-mo narrative malpractice that's been taking place since Season 3.

This series ending/"landing" really could have been their (writers/showrunners) big shot at successful critical longevity. Instead, they turned an open-book test into a public implosion. The bones of Atwood’s world were right there, mapped out and ready, but instead of following them, the writers/showrunners/actors-turned-directors misunderstood and eventually betrayed them.

Honestly, in retrospect, The Testaments feels like a deliberate course correction. A softspoken “no, actually” from Atwood herself, reaffirming where the moral core of this story lies. And yes, that includes Nick. The show had the source material in addition to the reinforced narrative/additional insights provided by Atwood in The Testaments (released in September 2019, shortly after the television adaptation began airing its third season.)

And when the backlash from the final season hit shortly after the "betrayal," they deflected by calling loyal fans/viewers love-blind, shallow, or naive (especially women) for caring about a character who dared to represent subtle resistance (apparently you need to be on-the-nose and in-your-face defiantly obvious about your intentions or you too could be called a Nazi twice in the last season of a show based on a literary narrative that you've been a character/major part of in since the 1980s).

In their defense, they love to mention OC characters like Lawrence as if he's the beacon of proof of their creative genius, but here's the truth- Lawrence worked exceedingly well in spite of the writing, not because of it. That was thanks to Bradley Whitford’s interpretation and creative latitude. Same with Nick.. except Minghella had far less input, because Nick was/IS Atwood’s creation. Ultimately, both characters (one canonical, one not) succeeded because the actors did the heavy lifting when the scripts couldn’t.

The writers should not misinterpret this as a flex, because it more appropriately should be ready as a red flag warning at the beach, ultimately showing the dangers of what happens when performers understand the source material more deeply than the people that were paid to adapt it, and when writers confuse praise for their original characters as being praise for their writing vs it just being masterful performance by the actor themselves that makes the character work.

.. dangers such as, for instance, now you've got a nonsensical last season, and not to mention, a ticked off loyal fanbase, who started with the show back in 2017, absolutely refusing to even consider watching TT.

They are so smart you guys, like you don't even know.

In the end, they confused moral ambiguity with moral incoherence, flattened complexity into cliché, and mistook erasure for subversion.

I'll end it here although I could keep going: Nick didn’t need a redemption arc, he already had one published in 1985, and then Atwood doubled down on it in her 2019 Handmaid's "sequel," The Testaments, but sadly, neither he (Nick) nor Minghella were backed by writers, showrunners, or actors-turned-directors brave enough to commit to it.

[boycottthetestaments]

📣 Stay Connected. Stay Loud.

If you support our movement and want to help us hold the creators of The Handmaid’s Tale accountable for their betrayal of Nick Blaine’s character — follow us on Instagram:

👉 @boycottthetestaments_official

💙Let’s build momentum across platforms.

💚Let’s be seen.

🤍Let’s be heard.

[boycottthetestaments]

📣 Mobilize Monday: Time to Take Action!

Every movement starts with a spark — but it takes a community to keep the fire burning. If you’ve been watching from the sidelines, now is the perfect time to step in and help us make noise.

🔹 JOIN US

We’re holding our campaign meetings to share strategy, updates, and ways you can get involved in the fight to hold The Handmaid’s Tale creators accountable for the erasure and retconning of Nick Blaine.

🔹 USE OUR HASHTAG

When you comment, post, or share anything related to the campaign — don’t forget to tag it:

👉 #BoycottTheTestaments

This is how we get seen. This is how we grow.

🔹 FOLLOW OUR OFFICIAL PAGE

We’re building momentum on Instagram! Follow us at

📲 @boycottthetestaments_official

for graphics, updates, testimonies, and more.

💥 We’re not just here to complain — we’re here to mobilize.

Let’s show Hulu, Elisabeth Moss, and Bruce Miller that we’re organized, united, and serious about accountability.

Let’s make noise — together. 💙💚🤍

[boycottthetestaments]

i’m sorry if this has been answered/posted before but what is the material aim of this blog? is it to have the testaments cancelled after season 1? have the series shut down altogether before it’s released? an apology/statement of some kind from an official hulu channel? this seems like a very organised effort and i’m curious to know what your benchmark for progress is if the movement is being discussed as a serious campaign.

📣 What Is the Goal of This Blog?

Thank you for asking this respectfully. It’s a valid question and one we’re happy to clarify.

This blog is part of a serious and organized campaign rooted in truth, accountability, and narrative integrity. We’re not casual fans. Many of us have been with The Handmaid’s Tale for nearly a decade, we’ve rewatched the series, studied the scripts, and read the source material. We invested emotionally and intellectually. And we’ve been met with betrayal.

Let’s be clear:

This is not about shipping. It’s about a fundamental violation of narrative trust, the gaslighting of viewers, and the erasure of one of the show’s most quietly revolutionary characters, Nick Blaine.

🎯 Our Goals Are As Follows:

1. A public acknowledgment from Bruce Miller, Elisabeth Moss, or Hulu that the show strayed from Margaret Atwood’s intended narrative, particularly the deliberate dismantling of Nick’s arc.

2. An apology to the fandom for the misleading PR, narrative contradictions, and character assassinations (especially in Season 6).

3. A clear course correction in The Testaments. We’re not trying to cancel the sequel, we’re asking that it honor canon. Nick Blaine was always a resistor, a Mayday operative. That must be reflected.

4. Amplify support for Max Minghella, whose nuanced portrayal was dismissed and overwritten in favor of sensationalism.

5. Restore the story’s original themes — love as resistance, survival over martyrdom, rebellion over compliance.

🚫 What We’re Not Doing:

We do not support harassment, doxing, or efforts to get anyone fired. This is a peaceful, strategic campaign. Our criticism is directed at creative choices, not personal attacks.

📈 Progress So Far:

• The hashtag #BoycottTheTestaments is gaining traction.

• Elisabeth Moss has turned off tagging on Instagram.

• Writers and staff have blocked fans engaging with this campaign.

These responses speak volumes. It means they’ve noticed.

💬 Who Is Welcome Here?

Anyone who feels betrayed by the show’s final seasons.

You don’t have to ship Nick/June. You just need to believe in accountability, respect the text, and support the integrity of this campaign.

This campaign was born from love, and refusal to be manipulated.

They thought they could rewrite the past and we’d go along. They miscalculated.

We are not disposable.

We remember.

And we will not be gaslit.

Thanks again for the ask.

[boycottthetestaments]

���🟩 Testimony Tuesday: Asks Now Open 🟩🟦

Are you still angry about how The Handmaid’s Tale treated Nick Blaine? Do you feel betrayed by the gaslighting, the retconning, and the complete erasure of character development we spent nearly a decade investing in?

This is your space. Your voice matters.

✨ Submit your testimony now through Monday at 12pm

Whether it’s one paragraph or a full vent, your words are welcome.

🛑 Anon is ON

🛡️ Trolls will be blocked

🔒 Your privacy will be respected

Let’s make our voices heard.

They wanted us to forget — we refuse.

#BoycottTheTestaments #TestimonyTuesday

[boycottthetestaments]

"He reaped what he sowed. He lived a violent & dishonest life"

" He’s so deep underground he needs a breathing tube.” - Margaret Atwood

Each and every one of those scenes represent a moment where Nick fought against Gilead, in his own way. By becoming an eye after the suicide of the Handmaid at the Waterford's. By denouncing the actions of commander Guthrie. By working underground with Mayday, supplying the women trapped in Jezebel's. He got the letters out of Gilead, giving credit to Luke. He killed Putnam. Pointed a gun on Fred's head to allow June and Holly / Nichole to escape. Helped Serena against Cushing. Delivered Fred to June. Organised with Mayday the first attempt of June's escape. Collected informations about Hannah for June. Punched Lawrence in the face in front of every other commanders. Made a deal with Tuello to keep June and his daughter safe. Killed two guardians to save Luke and Moira. And so much more...

So, would a true believer, a nazi, a villain have done any of it? Nick was smart, smarter than most. He knew that in order to survive, he had to keep a low profile. He fought in the shadows. But fought nevertheless. He just didn't expect to be betrayed by the woman he loved, the woman he tried so hard to save for so many years... She had a choice. And she made it.

[boycottthetestaments]

📌 Fact Check Friday: Eric Tuchman vs. The Actual

Show

🧠 Eric Tuchman claims that "95% of the time Nick is

a Commander, and June doesn't know what he's doing."

But here's the problem: The entire show is told from June's perspective. We only know Nick through her, and what she knows has shaped our view of him for six seasons. So what exactly has she seen?

Let's break it down:

🔹Season 1:

Nick is a man June wanted to hold onto. "I want to know him, memorize him, so I can live off the image later."

→ That's literally from the book. This was never just physical. It was survival, recognition, and connection.

🔹Season 2:

- The man who helped orchestrate June's escape before their child was born, and after only holding her once.

- The man who risked his life to get the letters of Gilead's women out.

- The man who delivered a message of love from Luke, even though it hurt him.

🔹Season 3:

- The man who helped her survive. June's words 3x05

- The father of her child. A child created out of love, not control.

🔹Season 4:

- The one who would "do anything" for her and for Nichole. 4x09 written by Eric Tuchman.

- A member of the underground resistance inside Gilead who got their daughter out. (Intro to 4x09)

- The one who delivered her abuser to her in the woods

- no questions asked.

🔹 Season 5:

- The man who brought her peace when no one else could-per the official 5x03 script.

"NICK: June. Hi.

"June suddenly feels like everything is going to be okay."

- The one without whom she "would never find happiness" - per the official 5x03 script.

"June: Hey Nick, try to be happy, ok?"

"It's an impossible ask, maybe, for these two to be truly happy without each other."

- The one who crossed into enemy territory to make sure she was alive.

- The one who signed a deal to keep her and their daughter safe

🔹Season 6:

- The man who would kill for her.

— The man who said he could lose everything except for her. 6x03

But suddenly we're meant to believe he was just an Eye, a Commander and the Gestapo? That we were wrong to trust her trust in him?

No!

Nick Blaine was never "good" or "bad." He was complex. And that's exactly how Max Minghella played him.

🧩Eric Tuchman wants to erase six seasons of development to retconNick's arc. But June's perspective — and the text - say otherwise.

We remember. And we're not letting this revisionism go unnoticed.

[boycottthetestaments]

🕯️ Character Legacy Spotlight: Nick Blaine the Resistor 💚💙

They want you to believe Nick Blaine was pro-Gilead. That his rank and role define his values. But let’s set the record straight. Nick Blaine was never pro-Gilead.

📌 In the Hulu Q&A, Bruce Miller himself admitted:

“Nick’s belief in any aspects of the Gilead ‘revolution’ have long-since faded. I think they left him the moment Gilead took over violently, and he was a part of that takeover.”

Let’s break it down:

🔹 Nick became an Eye not out of loyalty, but to strike back at corrupt commanders after seeing a Handmaid hang herself. His first mission was reporting on Fred.

🔹 He vowed to protect the next Handmaid . That Handmaid was June.

🔹 His relationship with June, a Handmaid, wasn’t just romantic. It was an act of rebellion in a regime that criminalized intimacy and autonomy.

🔹 He helped orchestrate June’s escape while knowing she was pregnant with his child. He chose her freedom over his own safety.

🔹 He delivered Fred to the woods, not as a Commander, but as a man who believed in justice.

They say he “rose in the ranks.” But Fred made him a Commander as punishment, for defying him, for pointing a gun at him. It was a death sentence in disguise. But Nick survived. Because he always does.

💥 And the canon backs this up:

📖 The Handmaid’s Tale Historical Notes:

“Nick… marks himself as a member of the shadowy Mayday underground… A number of Mayday operatives are known to have infiltrated the Gileadean power structure at the highest levels…”

✊ Nick Blaine is not a villain. He’s a resistor. A survivor. A double agent. And Margaret Atwood wrote him that way.

[boycottthetestaments]

I find this blog, fascinating.

I don’t necessarily agree, actually I don’t agree.

But I’m not here to hate.

I want to open a dialogue i’m more of a fan of the books that I am of the show so I was immediately shocked when I saw this blog.

I understand that the handmaid’s Tale is television and that it can be disappointing when we feel a character that we cared for and possibly related to is not portrayed in the way that we imagined them.

But I feel something has been missed when the entire emotional heart of a story about a woman’s struggle to free herself and her peers from an oppressive environment is about her relationship.

Now that you have read this far, I have to admit something I didn’t care for Nick and June’s love story, in the book Nick is something else he’s respite from the commander. I think the issue lies not in the fact that the writers betrayed Nic as a character, but in the fact that they did not effectively communicate to the actor who Nick was. Nick was a man in Gilead. He was in a situation of power over June. He was an eye he was a commander, and in the final moment he made the choice to side with Gilead. 

I had a very emotional response to seeing this blog, but I need to repeat again. This isn’t hate. I genuinely want to discuss this interpretation. I definitely also have some problems with the testaments show that’s going to come out although my issues lie with the portrayal of aunt Lydia in the handmaid’s Tale television series.

I would absolutely love to know more about your viewpoint on the situation and what you would’ve preferred to see done differently.

I hope the hear back from you soon.

Thank you for your ask. I understand where you’re coming from, and I appreciate that you’re open to dialogue.

But the truth is: people are drawn to The Handmaid’s Tale for different reasons. For me, and many others, it was Nick and June that pulled us in. Their relationship was the light in a deeply violent, dystopian world. It wasn’t a distraction from the story’s feminist themes, it embodied them. With Nick, June reclaimed her name, her voice, her body, and her autonomy. That’s not a detour from liberation, that is liberation.

You said Nick was just a respite. But the show made him so much more. His arc was interwoven across six seasons. He risked everything for June. He helped orchestrate her escape, smuggled letters, got Nichole out, facilitated her getting revenge against her abuser, protected Nichole, crossed the border, and signed a deal with the enemy just to keep them safe. He didn’t just love her, he fought for her.

You also mentioned that the show didn’t define his character well enough for the actor. Respectfully, I have to disagree. Max Minghella played Nick for nearly a decade. He understood him deeply, and fans saw that. If there was confusion, it’s because the writers upended everything they themselves built and tried to pass it off as intentional. That’s not subtlety, that’s revisionism.

Nick never aligned with Gilead. That’s canon, in the show and the book. Even the Historical Notes in The Handmaid’s Tale describe Nick as a likely Mayday operative who infiltrated Gilead’s power structure. The showrunners themselves previously said Nick was disillusioned with Gilead from the beginning. So what changed? Not the character. The spin.

What hurts the most is how the writers and press tried to gaslight the audience, to mock and belittle us like we’re teenage girls with a crush. We are not. I’m a woman with two degrees and a military background. I was a U.S. Army Sergeant. I was drawn to Nick because I’m drawn to morally complex characters, the ones who walk in gray areas to survive and resist.

This blog was created because they didn’t just betray Nick’s arc, they insulted the intelligence of the fans who carried this story for years. We’re the emotional core of this fandom. And we’re not going to be erased, dismissed, or rewritten.

BoycottTheTestaments ✊

[boycottthetestaments]

📌 Let’s be clear — this isn’t thoughtful writing. It’s retroactive justification.

Bruce Miller’s recent transcript from his interview on YouTube, revealed that there was no clear arc planned for Nick Blaine. His ending wasn’t earned. It wasn’t intentional. And Bruce contradicts himself in nearly every breath. Here’s the breakdown:

🔹 1. “We didn’t plan it.”

“I don’t think there was any big decision about what to do with Nick.”

→ Translation: They wrote him into a corner and called it depth.

🔹 2. “It’s a violent world.”

“We didn’t think about ‘I need to kill these characters’… it was such a violent world…”

→ Translation: The world did it, not the writers! Blame Gilead, not our lazy arc decisions!

🔹 3. “He made his choice when he got married.”

“He would never leave his pregnant wife… that was the choice.”

→ Translation: They’re pretending Nick never struggled. That he never risked anything. That his loyalty to June was meaningless.

🔹 4. “He chose the winning side.”

“He didn’t say ‘my side.’ He said ‘the winning side’… because the winning side means safe.”

→ Translation: They want to strip him of agency while also calling him a coward.

🔹 5. “He’s intimate with June, Lawrence, Rose…”

→ Translation: They’re confusing emotional complexity with narrative incoherence. Nick’s intimacy with June is not the same as his political dealings with Lawrence or his performative marriage to Rose. This is gaslighting.

🔹 6. “He has a loving moral core.”

“That’s the man June fell in love with… that’s who he is.”

→ So then why didn’t the writing reflect that?

📣 This isn’t interpretation. It’s contradiction.

Bruce Miller talks like he’s trying to sound profound, but it all falls apart under scrutiny. The writing didn’t reflect what he’s claiming now. And fans aren’t confused, we’re just not buying the spin.

🧠 Nick Blaine’s arc wasn’t confusing. It was rewritten. There was clear guidance from Margaret Atwood and everyone, except for Nick, ended where their story begins in The Testaments.

Bruce Miller is a Fucking Liar!!

[boycottthetestaments]

THISSSSSS!!!!!!⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

SO HELP ME GOD!

How are they expecting to get Testaments having good ratings when none of us will be watching after how they treated fans and max? Not only that they're removing his daughter from the show so now Daisy is some random girl how does that make sense? It's like a spit in the face to Margaret Atwood.

I don’t get it, it’s just so stupid. I run a business, and god, people matter. Clients, loyal audience, your base it takes years to build. How can you be so reckless with something you’ve cultivated for so long? I’m honestly shocked at how carelessly they did this and how they keep doubling down just to piss us off even more.

And the thing is , there are a lot of us. Not only are we never coming back, but we’re also going to tank every rating they’ve got. They’re going to be shocked by the force of our rage

[boycottthetestaments]

📣 Starting next week, we’re launching Testimony Tuesdays — a weekly feature amplifying the voices of Osblaine fans who feel betrayed by how the show ended Nick’s arc, and how the creators tried to gaslight us afterward.

🖊️ Submissions can be as long or short as you like.

🔒 Tumblr asks will be open from Friday to Monday for anonymous posts.

Or DM us privately and we’ll share your story without your name.

This is your space. Your voice. Your truth.

Let them know we remember. Let them know we’re not backing down.

[boycottthetestaments]

📣 Mobilize Monday: We’re Recruiting!

Are you an Osblaine who’s still furious about what they did to Nick Blaine and his legacy?

Still reeling from the gaslighting, the betrayal, and the erasure?

Good. Let’s turn that anger into action.

The Boycott The Testaments campaign is building a focused resistance — and we’re looking for people who are ready to fight back with purpose, passion, and strategy.

This isn’t just another fandom rant. This is organized accountability.

And we want you on our side — if you’re ready to commit.

REQUIREMENTS TO JOIN:

1. You’re a Nick fan.

2. You’re angry. Not confused. Not checked out. ANGRY.

3. You believe Nick Blaine was never pro-Gilead — and you’re tired of the lies.

4. You’re ready to help us expose the gaslighting, erasure, and PR spin — and boycott The Testaments.

💬 To Join:

DM me directly. You’ll answer 4 quick vetting questions.

If it’s a fit, I’ll personally send you the link to join our private server.

We’re not here to debate.

We’re here to organize.

[boycottthetestaments]

Are you still pissed? Can’t eat, can’t sleep, can’t believe the writers just pulled that level of betrayal? GOOD. Use that fire. Let’s hit them where it hurts , the fucking ratings. I want them to haunt them

Here’s how to rate this dumpster fire of an episode 1 star on IMDb:

STEP 1: Create an IMDb Account

Go to www.imdb.com

Click “Sign In” in the top right corner

Choose “Create New Account” (or just log in with Google, Apple, or Amazon, fast as hell)

STEP 2:

Search The Handmaid’s Tale

Go to Season 6, Episode 9

STEP 3: Scroll down and hit “Rate This”

Click on that one lonely little star

STEP 4: Done? GOOD. Your rage has been counted.

Optional: You can also leave a written review about how fucked up this ep is

Now go grab your partner, your mom, your cat’s Gmail if you have to and do it again. They wanted “shocking”? Let’s shock them with the backlash they fucking earned

WHY THIS MATTERS:

This wasn’t just a bad episode. It was a slap in the face to loyal fans. It was the murder of a character with no arc, no closure, no respect while abusive characters got redemption arcs and soft lighting. They’re out here calling it a “love letter”? We’re mailing one back. And it says: YOU FUCKED UP

[boycottthetestaments]

Yup!!

I randomly watched a video about Scientology and you know what? I'm honestly no longer surprised by Moss’s statements or the way she promotes The Handmaid's Tale.

From what I gathered, the whole thing is built on manipulation, distortion of information, financial gain, and creating the illusion that this "community" makes you a better, more successful person.

They even interfere with choosing the "right" partner and put a lot of effort into keeping up appearances — even if it’s all just nonsense. On top of that, Scientologists reject psychology and psychiatry altogether.

I’m not sure there’s much more to say. I do believe everyone has the right to choose whatever religion works for them, but this just feels like massive manipulation designed to make certain people rich. What does that remind me of? It makes sense to me now why these practices must seem commonplace to her.

Bruh.

[boycottthetestaments]

🚨 CALLING ALL SUPPORTERS 🚨

If you’re following a Boycott The Testaments Instagram account, please double check that it’s the official one:

📲 @boycottthetestaments_official

Unfortunately, there is another account using the name Boycott The Testaments that is not affiliated with this campaign and does not represent our mission, values, or leadership.

✅ The official Instagram is connected to the same movement behind this Tumblr

✅ We are focused, unified, and organized

🚫 We are not associated with the creator of the other account

Please help us spread the word by following, sharing, and using our hashtags:

#BoycottTheTestaments #JusticeForNick #NickDeservedBetter

United voices matter. Let’s stay aligned. 💚💙

https://www.instagram.com/boycottthetestaments_official?igsh=YTB3M2pzY2t0Ymsz&utm_source=qr