cookierundiscourse

[cookierundiscourse]

Moderators and owners of cookie run discords

Right now two bozos are raiding cookie run servers and spamming shit and saying slurs

I reccomed you block the following two discord users to avoid them gaining access to your servers

[cookierundiscourse]

Hey @cookierunupdate why the hell are you allowing whitewashed art into your fanart book. Not only is Cocoa cookie is cannonly poc, red bean is certainly not white either, he’s is coded as inuit. Allowing drawings of both of them as white is racist as fuck and shows you don’t care about the game or the actual characters. This is fucking disrespectful fo devsisters

[cookierundiscourse]

somethings that scare me about the cr fandom:

1) the highly aggressive gatekeeping (this primarily happens with white choco and how people start yelling lesbophobia when you don’t agree with a head canon)

2) the amount of people saying canonly nb cookies are cis (i’ve seen this a lot with cookies like dj squid ink and peppermint. if you use binary pronouns for them but you still acknowledge they’re nb, then ur good. don’t insist nb cookies are cis or ur just being transphobic)

3) how fast drama and wars can start (one (1) popular cr rp blog said they don’t support mogai, and all the mogai cr fans (myself included) and mogai supporters got upset and up in arms over it, and don’t even get me started on the mt he/him lesbian chaos)

4) the amount of pedophillic and incest ships there are (i don’t even have to explain this one.)

[cookierundiscourse]

Yeah I'm a mogai supporter you idiot, I'm mogai myself

Supporting non-binary and other people who are trying to figure themselves out isn't toxic

I'm just fighting for my friend, who you're harassing and defaming the character of.

Marvus is  fucking Mogai supporter asdfghjk

Yeah, you’re a toxic shit who supports the LGBT community being mocked and going “its a choice!”

Plus  “I didn’t see the anon but-” You’re automatically fucking invalidated. You DON’T make shit like that until you see what anon he put, and the one he did afterwards!!   You’re not an adult if you think like a twelve year old.  Just because someone is nice to you doesn’t mean they’re nice to everyone.

[cookierundiscourse]

CALLOUT TIME

this is a callout for kiida/cam aka pitbullposting/mod agate on fujoshi-receipts/mod lily on ouma-againstdickheads-receipts

kiida has been known for, and i’m saying this bluntly, being a dick.

he has left a discord server in shambles (deleting half the emojis, roles, and server icon), accused someone of playing the victim when they tried to explain why kiida was kicked from the server

and as a recent strike, as a previous mod on bokunoaesthetics, before he left he deleted every post from the blog, replaced the icon, and locked the blog itself with no warning whatsoever

reciepts under the cut

@mondo-discourse @dtkcourse @iruma-discourse @art-course @midnight-against-nasties @macncheese-discourse

Keep reading

[cookierundiscourse]

@midnight-against-nasties

[cookierundiscourse]

I’ve seen a few ppl reblog panicked posts about Article 13. So.

Hey hey hey hey hey. Calm down! Yes, it was approved. No, I don’t think it’s a good thing. But there’s some misinformation spreading, so here are a few things, specifically about Article 13:

1) Fair Use is still a thing. None of the things ppl are saying will become illegal will become illegal.

2.) What the law would mean is that the RESPONSIBILITY for posting material that is in violation of copyright goes from the users to the platforms. That means that if someone reposted my drawing on let’s say Instagram, I could sue Instagram for letting that happen.

3.) This would mean that platforms will have to implement something similar to what Youtube and Twitch are already doing; an algorithm to block/catch copyrighted content.

4) BUT because Fair Use is still a thing, those algorithms will have to be paired with an appeal system, like the one on YT. Because the algorithms will probably be bad at catching content that isn’t in violation of copyright law, such as parodies etc.

5) Now, as we’ve seen on Youtube, the algorithms are not good at this fair use thing, and stuff like reviews become targeted by them all the time. This is why I think the law is ultimately going to be doing more harm than good.

6) NOTHING IS BECOMING ILLEGAL IN TERMS OF CONTENT. PLATFORMS IGNORING COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IS.

7) If companies give their consent to using, for example, their games in let’s plays etc., it’s still perfectly legal to post those (just like before). Most game companies, like EA has given blanket permission to post about their games online. This includes let’s plays. (Nintendo is like the only one that hasn’t, and only approved creators may post for example Zelda let’s plays, that’s been a thing on YT for ages)

8) Again, TRANSFORMATIVE WORKS ARE PROTECTED. You can still post those. There’s just probably going to be some extra steps in doing that, because algorithms suck. Like having to make an appeal if your content is transformative etc. this includes memes (if you aren’t just reposting), simblrs, fan art, fanfiction, parodies, reviews, etc.

9) How this will be handled will ultimately be up to the various platforms. They will choose the option that saves them most money. They don’t want to risk getting sued, so they’ll probably implement an algorithm to catch illegal content. WORST CASE scenario (which is unlikely) is that some platforms decide they don’t want to deal with this law and blocks their services from ppl in the EU. It’s possible, but probably won’t save them money in the long run. So. Algorithms.

THIS WILL NOT AFFECT NON PROFIT SITES (Wikipedia etc.), OPEN SOURCE SITES (Github etc.), NON PROFIT EDUCATIONAL REPOSITORIES, AND CLOUD SERVICES.

ALSO ARTICLE 11 DOES NOT CONCERN INDIVIDUALS. It would mean that news sources would be able to collect licensing fees from social media platforms that allow links from news sources, IF THE LINK INCLUDES A PREVIEW (like most sites include now) OR THE TITLE OF THE ARTICLE ETC. The law does not mean that individuals have to pay news sources to post links.

Again, it’s not a good idea in my opinion, but we’re not disappearing and Fair Use is still a thing. Simblr isn’t illegal. We’re okay.

[cookierundiscourse]

anna i accidentally deleted my blog do you have a list of antis to follow

antis!!! rb this post!!!!!!!!

[cookierundiscourse]

@princess-discourses here's the edits! There's a rectangle and a circle for you! The anti map flag was made by @onceler-agaisnt-nasties

[cookierundiscourse]

So I have some bad news.

Looks like someone’s been tracing my art and posting it to Google Plus.

Their Google Plus accounts can be found [here] and [here]. (Be careful, there’s some censored nsfw there.) I’ve already filed a report with Google Plus, and I would have filed a report with Tumblr but it seems as if there’s none of this artwork on their tumblr account (which can be found [here]).

I’m really upset and disappointed about this but I’ve dealt with this person before in terms of copying character design and it seems like they just don’t stop. So I was hoping to bring some light to it.

If there’s any sort of help anyone can give me, that’d be really appreciated.

[cookierundiscourse]

JUST A REMINDER THAT I HAVE OPENED A COOKIE RUN DISCORD SERVER AND WERE LOOKING FOR MORE PEOPLE TO JOIN

[cookierundiscourse]

LALT is back at it again folks!

I got a notif today that someone under the url op-is-/a-te/rfas/cist (without the slashes) reblogged my fuschia Lanque post. However I couldn’t see what they said since their blog is flagged as sensitive sooooo I made an alt account that let me turn safe mode off. I found out that it’s definitely LALT and that they deleted their reblog, stole the sprite, and made a post of their own with it instead

Also I wasn’t the only one who’s sprites were stolen either unfortunately

This sprite belongs to @gentleman-sprites

These crying friendsim edits belong to tagoora

And these talksprites belong to spriting-against-soda

Anyway please stay safe cause this shithead can be incredibly nasty to people so it’s best to block and report them

Also @ lanque collective here’s another url to snatch when they delete!

[cookierundiscourse]

@fuckmatpat

i made the mistake of clicking on one of matpats videos and was greeted with this

[cookierundiscourse]

Hey warning!!

This dude draws pedophilia of fink and professor Venomous. Repeat user 277698 draws pedophilia

Do not enage just block and report as harm to minors or sensitive topic

[cookierundiscourse]

Here, have some child pornography laws!

Pro-child porn advocates on here will often cite the first bunch of laws, saying that the part that matters is “[pictures that are] indistinguishable from that of a minor” - that unless a digital image is 100% lifelike and real-looking, it can’t be child pornography.

Guess what! NCMEC is here to tell you that you’re wrong.

“Federal law (18 U.S.C. §1466A(a)) also criminalizes knowingly producing, distributing, receiving or possessing with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, depicting: A minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct that is obscene, or An image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital or oral-anal, whether between people of the same or opposite sex that lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.”

So, that’s that. Explicit drawings and cartoons of children are ILLEGAL, even if they are clearly drawn and NOT indistinguishable from an actual child.

Enjoy prison, motherfuckers.

[cookierundiscourse]

Just an experiment. Reblog if you actually give a fuck about male victims of domestic violence and rape.

Of fucking course

What sick bastard doesn’t

[cookierundiscourse]

Archive of our own finally updated their search system!

You can now exclude tags from your search and more!