darkprincenite-blog-blog - Tumblr blog

darkprincenite-blog-blog · 5 years ago

Text

BLUE AND MAUVE -- wow!

BLUE AND MAUVE — wow!

View On WordPress

16 notes · View notes

darkprincenite-blog-blog · 7 years ago

Photo

73 notes · View notes

darkprincenite-blog-blog · 7 years ago

Photo

80 notes · View notes

darkprincenite-blog-blog · 7 years ago

Photo

Forms of anti-art

Marcel DuchampFountain,1917. Photograph byAlfred Stieglitz

Anti-art can take the form of art or not.[4][5] It is posited that anti-art need not even take the form of art, in order to embody its function as anti-art. This point is disputed. Some of the forms of anti-art which are art strive to reveal the conventional limits of art by expanding its properties.

Some instances of anti-art are suggestive of a reduction to what might seem to be fundamental elements or building blocks of art. Examples of this sort of phenomenon might include monochrome paintings, empty frames, silence as music, chance art. Anti-art is also often seen to make use of highly innovative materials and techniques, and well beyond—to include hitherto unheard of elements in visual art. These types of anti-art can bereadymades, found art, détournement, combine paintings, appropriation (art), happenings, performance art, body art.

Anti-art can involve the renouncement of making art entirely.This can be accomplished through an art strike and this can also be accomplished through revolutionary activism. An aim of anti-art can be to undermine or understate individual creativity. This may be accomplished through the utilization ofreadymades. Individual creativity can be further downplayed by the use of industrial processes in the making of art. Anti-artists may seek to undermine individual creativity by producing their artworks anonymously.They may refuse to show their artworks. They may refuse public recognition.Anti-artists may choose to work collectively, in order to place less emphasis on individual identity and individual creativity. This can be seen in the instance of happenings. This is sometimes the case with “supertemporal” artworks, which are by design impermanent. Anti-artists will sometimes destroy their works of art. Some artworks made by anti-artists are purposely created to be destroyed. This can be seen in auto-destructive art. André Malraux has developed a concept of anti-art quite different from that outlined above. For Malraux, anti-art began with the ‘Salon’ or 'Academic’ art of the nineteenth century which rejected the basic ambition of art in favour of a semi-photographic illusionism (often prettified). Of Academic painting, Malraux writes, 'All true painters, all those for whom painting is a value, were nauseated by these pictures – “Portrait of a Great Surgeon Operating” and the like – because they saw in them not a form of painting, but the negation of painting’. For Malraux, anti-art is still very much with us, though in a different form. Its descendants are commercial cinema and television, and popular music and fiction. The 'Salon’, Malraux writes, 'has been expelled from painting, but elsewhere it reigns supreme’. Anti-art is also a tendency in the theoretical understanding of art and Fine Art.The philosopher Roger Taylor puts forward that art is a bourgeois ideology that has its origins with capitalism in “Art, an Enemy of the People”. Holding a strong anti-essentialist position he states also that art has not always existed and is not universal but peculiar to Europe.The Invention of Art: A Cultural History by Larry Shiner is an art history book which fundamentally questions our understanding of art. “The modern system of art is not an essence or a fate but something we have made. Art as we have generally understood it is a European invention barely two hundred years old.” (Shiner 2003, p. 3) Shiner presents (fine)art as a social construction that has not always existed throughout human history and could also disappear in its turn.

91 notes · View notes

darkprincenite-blog-blog · 7 years ago

Photo