Tumgik
dnalt-d2 · 2 days
Text
ANNND Tubbo has killed the Baker Rabbit, AKA the only one who seemed to have the info about the children, or at least was the only one willing to share it
RIP my dude, there was no other way to close out the Tubbathon I guess
86 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 2 days
Text
"WE NEED TO BRING THE FRENCH"
--Philza Minecraft
48 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 2 days
Text
(Some of) THE CHILDREN HAVE RETURNED, HUZZAH
17 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 2 days
Text
Alright so I woke up to the last half of a Tallulah rescue. Alright
But I'm not missing the Chayanne rescue!!
8 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
Abduction Arc 2
Kidnapping Boogaloo
(i'm gonna fuckin krill myself i stg)
8 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
Tubbo laughing when the other Eggs are taken and only stopping when they go after Sunny lmao
32 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
Okay Cucuregg's name is apparently Nacho
I recognize the council's decision, but-
7 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
They've bonded over murder
It's a tale as old as time
11 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
CUCUREGG WITH A GUN CUCUREGG WITH A GUN OKAY
2 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
This just in, Cucuregg is fucking invincible I guess
8 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
Oh goddamn, dude dumped him in the Nether that's fucked
4 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 8 days
Text
Guys listen not to be mean or anything
But let's just say that for once, I'm with Cucurucho on this
Begone, Cucuregg
10 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 12 days
Text
Me:
Brain: IT IS TIME TO DRAW YOUR FIRST OCs FOR THE FIRST TIME IN AGES
Me:......
Me: Oh shit okay I guess
0 notes
dnalt-d2 · 17 days
Note
Alright, got to this late, but thanks again for the added info
All I'd heard is that Quackity's brother might be involved with the company, and that he was at one point accused of some very not good things. But that's about all I had, and I didn't really wanna dig into that particular mess for a couple reasons
But this is once again this is just why I don't like speculation with things like this. Because if there's even the tiniest hint of something wrong, even if it's unsubstantiated, it can have some pretty severe consequences
It's better to figure out the truth first than to put out half a theory and have it turn out to be wrong. At least when it's about real people. You can always add more information later, but you can't take it back once it's out there
the entire debate on wether or not lea is the cause of quackity getting doxxed or not is a complicated one
many people are arguing that because the information about quackity can technically be found in a public (government) website, then it does not count as doxxing, since a doxx is the publishing of private information with the intent of causing harm
the information lea shared (a paypal payment stub that had an email adress, and was identifiable as the admin "Quid", and then a skype screenshot that showed the same email adress being associated to the skype account, and said account having the full name of Q's brother in it) was not uploaded with the intent of threatening Q's safety via publishing his personal information.... but it WAS published to try and tie in his brother (who had some serious accusations on him back in 2020-2021) to the company based simply on speculation
mind you, what this then cause was for individuals to go "oh wait, you all didn know that? you can literally find every single information on Q if you go to this website and put this information, you even get the name of his lawyer!!!" (paraphrased), and suddenly, screenshots of this website and all the information on him that were in it were being shared on twitter, and getting thousands of likes and retweets, all the while with people justifying it by saying "well it's public information, so it's not doxxing" "q fans upset that people are sharing public info about a public figure" and such
the main issue here is that, while yes, the infromation can technically be accessed by anyone because it's a public website... there's a difference between knowing it's there and actively spreading it to the view of thousands of people who didnt even know or want to know it
so.... no, lea didnt technically doxx Q. however her actions (and her response) actively led to other individuals taking action and actively threatening him, as well as others justifying and even celebrating that is happening
so it's a complicated case imho
Oof
Yeah
That is
Uh
Complicated.
Holy Hell
Thank you also for the information, that clears some things up
QUITE A BIT
For starters, I wanna clarify in case it didn't come across correctly before, that while I don't think this is what Lea intended to happen, it definitely wasn't cool for her to put that stuff out there, and it REALLY wasn't cool to add any of those extra comments. (Or certain other comments that at this point I haven't felt it's my place to comment on) Just that I can believe it wasn't INITIALLY done maliciously, but as a result from WAY TOO MANY PEOPLE bombarding and practically threatening her for information. Which is why I'm all for keeping CERTAIN things more private
This all really just feels like a huge snowball effect because people can't fathom that they won't be in the loop for every single decision behind this business's actual behind-the-scenes organization, and some people in that business are feeling way too pressured, causing them to make decisions that MIGHT SEEM OKAY IN THE MOMENT but then realize immediately after that "Oh wait it actually wasn't, oh shit, I didn't think that would happen"
This is why I hate speculating and spreading information I don't have verified without clearly stating I haven't verified it. Because that's how stuff like this happens. It's why I haven't made comments about his brother in the first place, because I just straight-up don't have all the information on all that, and it's not even been proven true. But people hear a whisper and suddenly they're just grasping at it like the thinnest of straws for their argument
Once again though, thanks for the info, I always like to keep informed on things, even if I'm not actively talking about it
37 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 17 days
Note
Also I wanna add, when Lea got criticized for sharing the one screenshot without censoring sensitive information and putting Q at risk, she actually also said "what I went through is 10x worse", which encouraged people to share all of that stuff even more because Lea didn't denounce it. And then the very next day we find out that Qs safety was even more threatened than we originally thought it would be
Tumblr media
Okay yeah that's definitely not cool. Like she's right that Quackity and the Admins who messed up need to be held accountable, but this is just NOT the route to take on that. And trying to say that she shouldn't be held accountable if no one else is, is just a straight-up wrong statement. Two wrongs don't make a right and whatnot. This kind of mentality can lead down a pretty perilous rabbit hole that we're kind of already watching unfold in real-time
What Lea went through/is going through isn't okay, and she doesn't deserve to be harassed or threatened. But Quackity also doesn't deserve to have his personal safety threatened either. This really is getting needlessly complicated, and the stuff on Twitter really isn't helping. I'm really just of the opinion that everyone needs to step back and remember that they don't have any real stake in what's happening here outside of showing their support, and a lot of that added input could be causing more harm than good at this point
93 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 17 days
Note
the entire debate on wether or not lea is the cause of quackity getting doxxed or not is a complicated one
many people are arguing that because the information about quackity can technically be found in a public (government) website, then it does not count as doxxing, since a doxx is the publishing of private information with the intent of causing harm
the information lea shared (a paypal payment stub that had an email adress, and was identifiable as the admin "Quid", and then a skype screenshot that showed the same email adress being associated to the skype account, and said account having the full name of Q's brother in it) was not uploaded with the intent of threatening Q's safety via publishing his personal information.... but it WAS published to try and tie in his brother (who had some serious accusations on him back in 2020-2021) to the company based simply on speculation
mind you, what this then cause was for individuals to go "oh wait, you all didn know that? you can literally find every single information on Q if you go to this website and put this information, you even get the name of his lawyer!!!" (paraphrased), and suddenly, screenshots of this website and all the information on him that were in it were being shared on twitter, and getting thousands of likes and retweets, all the while with people justifying it by saying "well it's public information, so it's not doxxing" "q fans upset that people are sharing public info about a public figure" and such
the main issue here is that, while yes, the infromation can technically be accessed by anyone because it's a public website... there's a difference between knowing it's there and actively spreading it to the view of thousands of people who didnt even know or want to know it
so.... no, lea didnt technically doxx Q. however her actions (and her response) actively led to other individuals taking action and actively threatening him, as well as others justifying and even celebrating that is happening
so it's a complicated case imho
Oof
Yeah
That is
Uh
Complicated.
Holy Hell
Thank you also for the information, that clears some things up
QUITE A BIT
For starters, I wanna clarify in case it didn't come across correctly before, that while I don't think this is what Lea intended to happen, it definitely wasn't cool for her to put that stuff out there, and it REALLY wasn't cool to add any of those extra comments. (Or certain other comments that at this point I haven't felt it's my place to comment on) Just that I can believe it wasn't INITIALLY done maliciously, but as a result from WAY TOO MANY PEOPLE bombarding and practically threatening her for information. Which is why I'm all for keeping CERTAIN things more private
This all really just feels like a huge snowball effect because people can't fathom that they won't be in the loop for every single decision behind this business's actual behind-the-scenes organization, and some people in that business are feeling way too pressured, causing them to make decisions that MIGHT SEEM OKAY IN THE MOMENT but then realize immediately after that "Oh wait it actually wasn't, oh shit, I didn't think that would happen"
This is why I hate speculating and spreading information I don't have verified without clearly stating I haven't verified it. Because that's how stuff like this happens. It's why I haven't made comments about his brother in the first place, because I just straight-up don't have all the information on all that, and it's not even been proven true. But people hear a whisper and suddenly they're just grasping at it like the thinnest of straws for their argument
Once again though, thanks for the info, I always like to keep informed on things, even if I'm not actively talking about it
37 notes · View notes
dnalt-d2 · 17 days
Note
hi about the information that Lea leaked - it showed quackitys brothers name and an email address, both of which were already known to the public as it's on some official business documents. quackitys dox was already out there - if you've been in the community a while you'll know that all the information was already circulating since like 2020, and that the info that lea provided did not contribute to new info being leaked, people are just using this situation to spread the dox.
Gotcha, thanks for the info. I haven't been in the MCYT community for long, just QSMP since it started, so I didn't know pretty much any of that. I've been trying to figure out what happened exactly, since I heard a couple different things, and the initial tweet got deleted before I ever saw it. First I heard that she just put his actual address out there, then that she just put out a statement with his real name and that CAUSED people to be able to find his address. If that's all the document had, I can at least believe that this whole thing was an actual mistake on Lea's part. It's just still unfortunate regardless. Either way, thanks again for the info, Anon!
2 notes · View notes