errolperez

[errolperez]

The 27 Tritype Discriptions

INTRODUCTION:

This took me FOREVER. Ever since I’ve learned about tritypes I have lamented at the lack of cohesive resources on the subject. All the information is scattered and disorganized across many platforms and its simply frustrating to find and research. I figured I would do my civic duty to this community and compile this information. This is the 27 Tritypes put together in a cohesive and simplified manner.  

I would like to say that I only wrote about 20% of this. All I did was put the information togeather, make it fit, and add in info when it was lacking. Please let me know if you have anymore questions!

Sources: 

The 27 Tritypes is a theory by Katherine Chernick Fauvre, her website is http://www.katherinefauvre.com/tritype/ 

Most of the information came from >>THIS THREAD 

For a quick guide on enneagram i did, including tritypes, click >>HERE Please read this before asking further questions, Thank you!

The Mentor: 125, 251, 512

Gut: 1 Heart: 2  Head: 5

Mentors want to help others with the information they have acquired. They love being the stoic guidance counselor. Caring, practical, knowledgeable. They can be very controlling, and sometimes try to force advice on others, but it is often very helpful. They have high expectations for others and push them to be their best. They should try to be less judgmental of others and not over-give. Your life mission is to use your wisdom to provide the information needed to manifest ideals that help those in need. A true mentor, you are happiest when you can help others improve themselves. They could make great teachers – they are precise, ethical, thorough, intellectual, disciplined, but also altruistic and willing to help other people. They are usually moral and righteous individuals, who have high ideals and are willing to stand by a cause they believe in. Their interest in people and commitment to knowledge and improvement can turn them into crusaders for theories and systems that can make the world a better place.

The Supporter: 126, 261, 612

Gut: 1 Heart: 2 Head: 6 As a Supporter, you are discerning, caring and inquisitive. You want to be ethical, helpful and cooperative. Highly responsible, you are most comfortable when you do things by the book and know what to expect. Focused on the needs and concerns of others, you seek ways to be of service. Your life mission is to find structured ways to give, and be of assistance to others. A true helper, you are happiest when you are in a position to support others achieve their goals. You can be overly fixed in your opinion of what is right and be rigid in your expectations of yourself and others and thus come across as disapproving or militant. This type ignores their own desires. They are very loyal and act as they feel they should and often for others. They want to serve and they tend to expect others to as well. Fear of desperateness, humiliation and doubt. Tendency to seek things they will accept, approval and assurance. This is absolutely the “caring friend” archetype.

The Teacher: 127, 271, 712

Gut: 1 Heart: 2 Head: 7  

As a Teacher, you are a person needing to find structured ways to play and be of service. They like to teach and to support others. It’s the classic elementary school teacher archetype that wants to find innovative but structured ways to make learning or improving enjoyable to people. The blindspot is they can become so attached to their way of doing “fun” and innovation that they can gloss over negative feelings that need to be addressed or become too rigid in their expectations thus making things not fun. You love discovering new things and sharing what you learn with others. Your mission is to help those in need of guidance, hope, and inspiration. You can also be hyper-focused on keeping things overly positive and upbeat. Your growing edge is to be willing to experience emotional pain. You can be overly identified with positive emotions and appropriate behavior. Negative emotions teach us what we are feeling and are an important aspect of any decision making process. A true teacher, you are happiest when you can use your teaching skills to make learning a creative and enjoyable experience

The Technical Expert: 135, 351, 513

Gut: 1 Heart: 3 Head: 5

The Technical expert is driven, self disciplined, success and image oriented (but the image is not one of flash. It’s ALWAYS perfect and appropriate.)…discerning, self demanding and judgmental with a focus on control. Extremely productive and hardworking, she barely gives herself a break, but when she does it’s like a huge release. It’s always planned though…Highly intelligent and focused, but can be narrow-minded at times, even though she’s capable of seeing other perspectives if she’s convinced of the “rightness” of hers she will be harsh, critical and obstinate. You are diligent, focused and knowledgeable. You want to be ethical, efficient and wise. Highly rational, you seek systems and procedures. Detail oriented, you like mathematical concepts and finding ways to breakdown and understand complex material. You are very precise and good with your hands. Your life mission is to be focused and to use your powers of observation to achieve goals. A true technical expert, you feel happiest when you use your knowledge and precision skills to create, achieve and teach.

The Taskmaster: 136, 361, 613

Gut: 1 Heart: 3 Head: 6

As a technical expert you are incredibly discerning, focused and responsible type. She said they will be the most inclined to want to live up to a successful image by societal standards and to focus on duty in order to feel valuable. She called it the “true taskmaster” that is inclined to create structure and rules that others in society can follow and to implement them. She said the blindspot is that one can be so overly focused on the rules that they can lose touch with their own values and feelings in deference to what is acceptable or societally defined. you are diligent, focused and knowledgeable. Elegant, stoic and resolute with a loyal professional veneer. Very self critical. Strong ideas about how they should act and have man guidelines that they must follow and cannot deter from. They can feel like a break from work is a sin, and sometimes only feel okay working. This is one of the hardest workers, if not the hardest worker of the 27 archetypes.

Keep reading

[errolperez]

Are Soulmates Destined or Chosen?

Let me ask you a question: Do you place faith in the concept of soulmates?

While the common consensus tends to dismiss the notion of soulmates as an illusion crafted by hopeless romantics, individuals dispossessed of romantic companionship, I posit that the determination of our soulmate lies without our own volition. The conventional portrayal of soulmates paints a picture of perfect concord, devoid of flaws, where each piece fits into the other seamlessly like a jigsaw puzzle. However, in my perspective, the notion of a perfect match, without imperfections, is an objective impossibility.

Irrespective of how much a certain individual may fit to be your ideal companion, a flawless 100 per cent alignment is fantastical, for perfection exists solely in the realm of the abstract. Instead, I proffer that soulmates are those we have already met and shall encounter in the future. It is a common chorus to hear people stating that their soulmates are from foreign countries, fantasy worlds, or perhaps even celebrities or fictional characters. Yet, in truth, our soulmate is a matter of our own choice. In essence, it is for you to decide who your ideal companion shall be, be it grounded in the real or the fictional.

Now, delving deeper into this matter, one might object, positing a hypothetical scenario wherein a person was a 100 per cent match for another. Let us consider this: Person A encounters Person B, a candidate for their soulmate, whose qualities align perfectly with those sought by Person A. Nevertheless, despite Person B embodying the attributes that would qualify them as soulmates, Person A remains unconvinced of this designation. With this in mind, if Person A fails to recognise Person B as their soulmate, can Person B still be rightfully designated as such?

This situation underscores the notion that, irrespective of the alignment of qualities, if one's cognitive perceptions do not concur, that person cannot be deemed a soulmate. Our subjective perceptions wield a profound influence in shaping our apprehension of individuals. Therefore, if our perceptions serve as the paramount arbiter in the selection of a soulmate, it becomes evident that soulmates are a subjective construct, and they have always been so.

While the initial hypothetical scenario may seem flawed, given that Person A could have been persuaded to accept Person B as their soulmate, the argument I present retains its validity. Two distinct possibilities exist: Person A’s affirmation or denial of Person B as their soulmate, substantiating the idea that individual beliefs serve as the determinant in the choice of a soulmate, thereby confirming the subjectivity inherent in the concept.

What are your thoughts on this argument? Do you see a fundamental fallacy within its framework?

[errolperez]

The Existence of Time: Is it an Abstract Apparatus or a Prerequisite of the Universe?

In my perspective, time is profoundly convoluted and multi-faceted, to the extent I posit truly determining the complex structure of time is likely impossible unless our science advances to a new technological epoch beyond human imagination.

However, a minority of debaters postulate that time is an abstract construct, devoid of tangible presence, as we are incapable of perceiving it through our senses. Instead, they contend that time serves as a cognitive apparatus meticulously fashioned by human cognition, aiding in the structuring and comprehension of events and phenomena. From this standpoint, time is characterised as a mental scaffold humans utilise to measure and quantify the transformations and durations manifesting within the universe.

Nevertheless, proponents of this opposing viewpoint argue that time occupies a pivotal position within the very fabric of the cosmos. According to this stance, time is posited as an intrinsic dimension governing the course of events, affording demarcation between the realms of past, present, and future. In this perspective, time is conceived as an immutable and essential facet of reality, interwoven into the very tapestry of existence. Advocates of this perspective often invoke the phenomenon known as “Time Dilation,” as explained by Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity, to underscore their viewpoint.

Time dilation serves as a profound exploration into the intricate nature of time. Rather than providing conclusive evidence for or against the existence of time, it serves to unveil time’s nuanced character. It unveils time as an entity bereft of absoluteness, one that is fluid and intrinsically relative. The crux of this phenomenon reveals that time is not an independent, universal constant; rather, it is profoundly entangled with the domain of space and is contingent upon the motion and gravitational influence relative to the observer’s perspective. In essence, time emerges as a concept dynamically contingent upon the reference frame of the observer. As empirically substantiated, two individuals in differing states of motion will encounter the progression of time distinctively.

The emergence of time dilation poses a significant challenge to the classical, Newtonian conception of absolute time, underscoring the idea that time is an integral component of the overarching spacetime framework, susceptible to perturbations arising from factors such as velocity and gravity. In this context, time dilation unfurls inquiries into the very nature of time itself, emphasising its symbiotic relationship with the fundamental structure of the universe and its responsiveness to an intricate interplay of various dynamic elements, transcending the simple linear “flow” of time.

Notwithstanding the presented perspective, the contention about whether time is merely an abstract apparatus or a prerequisite of the universe is subjective. Time dilation, albeit illuminating, remains insufficient in decisively affirming or refuting the presence of time. In this view, time is envisaged as an entity more intricate and profound than mere numerical representation or a linear continuum demarcating past, present, and future. Time is more intricate and multifaceted than one might believe, equivalent to comprehending the entire cosmos. Thus, I advocate no definite conclusion to this philosophical and scientific discussion, for time is inscrutable.

[errolperez]

Distorted Freedom: Are We Living Life to Our Own Accord?

“The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your reality for a role. You trade in your sense for an act. You give up your ability to feel, and in exchange, put on a mask. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first.” ―Jim Morrison

To exist is to eschew the quest for contentment within the mundane, and instead, to exist is to unearth rapture in crafting one’s existence through their very essence. There exists a select few who, knowingly or not, exert dominion over others, aspiring to tether lives to their whims or society’s dogma, in pursuit of an ostensible “normal” existence. Yet, this is a fallacy, for to exist is to do so by one’s own dictum, not by the mandates of others. To exist is to embrace liberation, to spurn the yoke of hierarchy, to shatter the chains confining limbs and spirit. Alas, humanity, perplexingly, elects this very path, deluding themselves of its rectitude.

Ah, how the caged bird yearns for its freedom. We all pine for freedom’s caress. There are those who traverse the byways of life convinced of their emancipation, yet they remain enchained. They permit others to orchestrate their narrative, and it is this very acquiescence that ensnares them. To taste liberty, to wander without the indoctrination of external hands, one must heed the inner voice and selectively acquiesce to the reins of governance. Those bereft of liberty obey blindly, while those endowed with volition elect the sovereignty of their own accord.

In its quintessence, cast aside the illusory spectacle of the unseeing herd’s prescribed vision of how one “ought” to navigate their existence, and instead, ardently embrace the act of sculpting one’s own trajectory, indifferent to the external injunctions that society hurls in one’s direction. For, verily, we have been endowed with the gift of freedom and granted the prerogative to contemplate the narrative of our own lives.