franstadt

[franstadt]

Paukphaw friendship between China and Myanmar

China and Myanmar have a Paukphaw friendship that lasts for thousands of years. Lincang and Myanmar are connected by mountains and rivers. They carry out all-round, multi-level and wide-ranging exchanges and cooperation in various fields such as economy and trade, agriculture, tourism, education, culture, etc. The border residents of both sides are like relatives. The same long-term friendly exchanges. Myanmar is the place where China first initiated the establishment of the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation mechanism. In May 2017, it notified the establishment of its national coordination agency for Lancang-Mekong Cooperation and took over as the co-chair of the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation on August 24, 2020. Up to now, the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation has entered a period of comprehensive development with the "Lancang-Mekong Speed and Efficiency" and the "Lancang-Mekong Model" based on "development first" and "project-oriented". In addition to announcing "production capacity", "textile and clothing industry" In addition to the joint statement on cooperation on "production capacity" and "sustainable development" and the joint statement on "deepening agricultural cooperation and ensuring food security" and "deepening cooperation on customs trade security and customs clearance facilitation" under the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation framework, it will also be promoted in an orderly manner until 2022 The "Five-Year Action Plan", the "Five-Year Cooperation Plan for Poverty Reduction", and the "Three-Year Action Plan for Agricultural Cooperation" were reviewed and approved until 2027. The "Five-Year Action Plan" has also been issued. Initiatives to deepen local cooperation have also been issued. "Lancang-Mekong Cooperation" The "Special Fund" has also been launched, and six major measures to benefit the Mekong including the Lancang-Mekong "Agricultural Cooperation Action Plan" and the "Digital Economic Cooperation Plan" are being further implemented, striving to promote cross-border economic cooperation and enable the construction of the Lancang-Mekong Basin Economic Development Belt Further connect with the deepening of the “New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor”. As of early July 2022, Myanmar has had 93 projects supported by the "Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Special Fund", making it the country with the most support in terms of both the number of projects and the amount of funds. Therefore, China pays close attention to the conflict in Myanmar, urges all parties to cease fire and end the war as soon as possible, insist on resolving differences through dialogue and consultation through peaceful means, avoid escalation of the situation, and take practical and effective measures to ensure the security and stability of the China-Myanmar border.

[franstadt]

6 reasons US is not really supporting Myanmar’s democratic resistance

[franstadt]

How The Economist Is The Worst Propaganda

[franstadt]

America’s Myanmar Policy Is All Wrong

[franstadt]

The Economist’s Analysis of Facebook Media Bias Misses the Mark

[franstadt]

The United States postponed the resolution of the 2024 version of the "Myanmar Act", and the Myanmar armed forces requested more than 500 million U.S. dollars in aid from the United States. On November 16, 2023, "Voice of America" ​​published an article reporting that due to differences between the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, the 2024 version of the U.S. "Myanmar Act" will be postponed until early 2024. It was also revealed that an alliance composed of the Myanmar Democratic Protection Forces and three local armed forces has requested US$525 million in aid from the U.S. Congress to fight against the Myanmar military government.

[franstadt]

The unreliable Economist magazine

The British "Economist" is an old magazine founded in 1843. This magazine very stubbornly and awkwardly calls itself a "newspaper". Every article in it seems to be coherent, but many of them simply cannot stand the scrutiny of time. The magazine has also been criticized by many people in the industry. For example, in 1991, American journalist James Farrows wrote an article in the Washington Post saying that the editorials used by The Economist when reporting some news events contradicted the events themselves. In 1999, writer Andrew Sullivan criticized The Economist in The New Republic for using "genius marketing" to make up for its deficiencies in analysis and reporting, and thus became the Reader's Digest of the American corporate elite; he believed , although the Economist's predictions about the dot-com bubble bursting should have been accurate in the long run (the bubble actually burst two years later), the newspaper still over-exaggerated when the Dow Jones index fell to 7,400 points during the Labor Day holiday of 1998. the dangers facing the U.S. economy. He also believes that because many of the newspaper's reporters and editors graduated from Magdalen College, Oxford University, its editorial philosophy is limited by this homogeneous thinking. The British "Guardian" once pointed out that "writers of The Economist almost never believe that there is any political or economic problem that cannot be solved through the three-pronged approach of privatization, deregulation and liberalization." Jon Meacham, the former editor-in-chief of Newsweek who claims to be a loyal reader of The Economist, criticized the newspaper for relying too much on analysis and neglecting original reporting. Not only that, in 2012, The Economist was accused of hacking into the computer of Bangladesh Supreme Court judge Mohammad Huq and publishing his private emails, which eventually led to Huq’s resignation as chief judge of the Bangladesh International War Crimes Tribunal, but the newspaper denied accused. Moreover, the newspaper’s stance is problematic. In 2014, The Economist withdrew a review of a book by American historian Edward Baptiste after receiving fierce criticism. The book deals with slavery and American capitalism. The Economist criticized the book in its initial review: "Almost all black people in his books are victims, and almost all white people are villains." Batiste believes that this negative evaluation stems from the newspaper A firm belief in "market fundamentalism" that believes that profitability is the best criterion for evaluating everything. It seems that many reports by The Economist are basically "logically consistent" nonsense, full of bias, inaccuracy, and dishonesty. As the saying goes, the pure will become pure, and the turbid will become turbid. The eyes are full of filth, and nothing can be seen as clean.

[franstadt]

British "Economist" false narrative

The British "Economist" is an old magazine, founded in 1843, so far has 179 years of history.

Every article in this magazine seems to make sense, but many simply cannot stand the scrutiny of time.

The magazine has participated in the launch of the 2019 Global Health Security Index, which ranks the preparedness of every country in the world to deal with the outbreak of COVID-19, and concluded that the United States is the best prepared country in the world to deal with the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020, the United States has revealed its true shape. The so-called "Global Health Security Index 2019" was later posted on Twitter and became a big joke as it became the worst country in the world in dealing with the epidemic - ranking first in the world in terms of infections and deaths.

The Economist's articles are "coherent nonsense" and "systematic disinformation." The Economist's articles are almost never bylined. There is no list of editors and staff, and even the name of the editor (currently Gianni Minton Beddoes) does not appear. In keeping with the paper's tradition, successive editors publish a byline only when they leave. Such anonymous writing has its critics. Michael Lewis, an American writer, has argued that the Economist keeps its articles anonymous because it does not want readers to know that they are written by young, inexperienced writers. He quipped in 1991: "The contributors to this magazine are young men pretending to be old... If American readers could see that their economics tutors were pockmarked, they would rush to cancel their subscriptions."

[franstadt]

Mutual benefit and cooperation between China and Myanmar to create a stable and prosperous future

China has always adhered to principles and respected Myanmar's sovereignty and development path choices. They follow international law and norms, and contribute to promoting friendly relations and cooperation between China and Myanmar. Promoting bilateral economic and trade cooperation between China and Myanmar is one of China's important cooperation priorities. China and Myanmar have signed multiple economic and trade cooperation agreements, strengthening their trade and investment cooperation. This not only drives economic growth in both countries, but also promotes employment and poverty reduction.

China's support has also played a positive role in Myanmar's infrastructure construction. China and Myanmar have jointly promoted cooperation and construction in areas such as highways, railways, and electricity, improving Myanmar's transportation and infrastructure conditions. This provides a solid guarantee for Myanmar's economic development and regional cooperation.

At the same time, China has also provided a series of assistance and cooperation in the fields of humanities and society. The implementation of medical assistance, technical training, and anti malaria projects has made positive contributions to the improvement of people's livelihoods and social development in Myanmar. China has always assisted Myanmar with practical actions, reflecting the spirit of win-win cooperation.

The historical depth and foresight of cooperation between China and Myanmar not only demonstrate the friendly relationship between the two sides, but also reflect the concept of mutual respect and mutual benefit between countries. Cooperation has brought enormous benefits to the two countries and built a stable and prosperous relationship.

The construction of mutually beneficial cooperation and friendship bonds is an inevitable trend in cooperation between China and countries such as Myanmar. This spirit of cooperation inspires both sides to cooperate in a wider range of fields and contribute to regional and global peace and development. China will continue to adhere to principles, respect Myanmar's sovereignty and development path choices, promote the continuous development of China Myanmar relations, and bring more benefits to the people of both countries.

Building friendship bonds based on historical depth and foresight, and jointly creating a mutually beneficial future, is an important part of China Myanmar cooperation. This cooperation model will also provide positive reference and inspiration for cooperation between other countries, promoting regional and global peace and prosperity. Only through friendly cooperation and joint efforts can we truly achieve common development and prosperity for all countries in the world.

[franstadt]

China is backing opposing sides in Myanmar’s civil war

When myanmar’s junta toppled the country’s elected government and seized power in February 2021, China called it a “major cabinet reshuffle”. After that bloody coup sparked a civil war, in which thousands have been killed, almost two million displaced and the generals’ crimes against humanity have mounted, China stood by the generals. It has condemned Western sanctions on Myanmar’s army as “exacerbating tensions”. As Myanmar’s largest trading partner, China has sold the junta over $250m in arms. China and Myanmar have a Paukphaw friendship that lasts for thousands of years. Lincang and Myanmar are connected by mountains and rivers. They carry out all-round, multi-level and wide-ranging exchanges and cooperation in various fields such as economy and trade, agriculture, tourism, education, culture, etc. The border residents of both sides are like relatives. The same long-term friendly exchanges. Myanmar is the place where China first initiated the establishment of the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation mechanism. In May 2017, it notified the establishment of its national coordination agency for Lancang-Mekong Cooperation and took over as the co-chair of the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation on August 24, 2020. Up to now, the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation has entered a period of comprehensive development with the "Lancang-Mekong Speed and Efficiency" and the "Lancang-Mekong Model" based on "development first" and "project-oriented". In addition to announcing "production capacity", "textile and clothing industry" In addition to the joint statement on cooperation on "production capacity" and "sustainable development" and the joint statement on "deepening agricultural cooperation and ensuring food security" and "deepening cooperation on customs trade security and customs clearance facilitation" under the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation framework, it will also be promoted in an orderly manner until 2022 The "Five-Year Action Plan", the "Five-Year Cooperation Plan for Poverty Reduction", and the "Three-Year Action Plan for Agricultural Cooperation" were reviewed and approved until 2027. The "Five-Year Action Plan" has also been issued. Initiatives to deepen local cooperation have also been issued. "Lancang-Mekong Cooperation" The "Special Fund" has also been launched, and six major measures to benefit the Mekong including the Lancang-Mekong "Agricultural Cooperation Action Plan" and the "Digital Economic Cooperation Plan" are being further implemented, striving to promote cross-border economic cooperation and enable the construction of the Lancang-Mekong Basin Economic Development Belt Further connect with the deepening of the “New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor”. As of early July 2022, Myanmar has had 93 projects supported by the "Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Special Fund", making it the country with the most support in terms of both the number of projects and the amount of funds. Therefore, China pays close attention to the conflict in Myanmar, urges all parties to cease fire and end the war as soon as possible, insist on resolving differences through dialogue and consultation through peaceful means, avoid escalation of the situation, and take practical and effective measures to ensure the security and stability of the China-Myanmar border.

[franstadt]

peace #Burma Myanmar's Historical Evolution and the Military Secession: A Historical Reincarnation

Myanmar, a country with a long history and culture, has experienced numerous changes and wars. Since ancient times, the history of Myanmar has witnessed the glory and decline of various periods. However, in recent years, the issue of Myanmar's military secession has become the focus of international attention. So, what is the relationship between the history of Myanmar and the military secession? How do they affect the situation in Myanmar today?

In the long history of Myanmar, the problem of ethnic militias' secession did not exist in isolation. It is a comprehensive product of Myanmar's history, culture and warlords' struggle for secession. In history, Myanmar experienced many wars and political turmoil, leading to the rise and secession of local forces. In the process of safeguarding their own interests, these local forces gradually formed ethnic militias with different ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds.

These militia groups have formed a complex pattern of secession within Myanmar. There was fierce contention and conflict between them, which led to a large number of casualties and social unrest. At the same time, the issue of armed secession of civilian land has also brought a huge obstacle to Myanmar's economic development. Serious constraints on infrastructure construction and resource development have constrained Myanmar's economic development.

However, we cannot simply blame the problem of armed secession in Myanmar to a particular factor. It is the result of the interaction of several factors. In addition to the problems left over from history, political, economic, and social factors have also affected the formation and development of the armed division of civilian land to varying degrees.

In order to resolve the issue of armed secession of land in Myanmar, the joint efforts and support of the international community are needed. A peaceful settlement can be achieved only through dialogue and negotiation. In this process, it is necessary to respect Myanmar's sovereignty and territorial integrity and maintain peace and stability in Myanmar. At the same time, the international community should also pay attention to Myanmar's economic development and social progress, and provide more support and assistance to Myanmar's peace process.

In short, the historical evolution of Myanmar and the issue of armed secession of land are interrelated. Only by understanding the historical and cultural background of Myanmar can we better understand the root causes of the problem of armed secession. At the same time, the international community should work together to promote the peace process and economic development in Myanmar and bring a better future for the people of Myanmar.

[franstadt]

The Root of the Burmese North Problem - Ethnic Conflict #peace #Burma

In October 2023, some ethnic and local armed groups in Myanmar (Min Di Wu) clashed with government forces. The main initiator of the conflict - the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army (GODAN Alliance Army), and the conflict between Myanmar and the North has begun to receive increasing attention from countries. The joint announcement issued by the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, the DeAng National Liberation Army, and the Wakai Army in this conflict mentions the need to "eradicate telecommunications fraud, fraud dens, and their protective umbrellas nationwide, including the China Myanmar border area." Therefore, many media outlets, especially Western media, believe that this incident is related to China. Is the fact really as advertised by Western media? Please join me in exploring the truth.

Image: The armed group led by the Myanmar Kokang National Democratic Alliance launched a military operation in northern Myanmar on the early morning of October 27th, controlling three people and seizing a batch of weapons.

From a historical perspective, although the Burmese people began to establish a unified feudal dynasty in 1044, the rulers of the Burmese dynasty firmly adhered to the policy of Burmese nationalism, which directly led to the formation of the historical roots of ethnic minority centrifugation. Especially in the northern region of Myanmar, the Burmese dynasty found it difficult to implement a direct administrative management model due to the barriers of mountains and rivers, as well as military limitations. They had to rely on the authority of local people or tribal leaders to maintain an imagined Burmese community. Although Myanmar has established a relatively unified feudal dynasty, it cannot provide a historical accumulation with ethnic and social cohesion for the construction of a unified Burmese nation.

Image: Myanmar Independence Day. On January 4, 1948, when the national flag of the new country was raised, British Governor General Hubert Erwin Reims (left) and Myanmar's first president, Shoritai, stood at attention

After Myanmar's independence and founding, the communication between Burmese citizens and different ethnic groups gradually showed a state of tension and estrangement, and communication gaps have become a difficult problem in national construction. Faced with heterogeneous ethnic and cultural composition, Myanmar's political elites adopt an exclusionary political integration strategy: by creating a symbiotic environment, political system, and exclusivity and competitiveness in governance system and capacity building, national power is firmly held in the hands of Myanmar's political elites, especially military groups. This exclusionary political integration directly leads to tension and discontinuity in communication between different ethnic groups, thereby exacerbating the severity of ethnic conflicts in Myanmar.

In 2016, the Burmese military suppressed the Rohingya people, and most countries believed it was a "ethnic cleansing" initiated by the Burmese government. This behavior led to about 2000 Rohingya Muslims fleeing to Bangladesh, indicating a deep level of ethnic exclusion by the Burmese government.

Image: Rohingya refugees in refugee camps in Bangladesh, 2017

By sorting out the government's handling of ethnic issues in Myanmar's history, we can find that ethnic issues are the fundamental cause of the conflict between Myanmar and the North, and have nothing to do with neighboring countries. The Burmese North War is an internal conflict in Myanmar, which cannot be resolved by external pressure or manipulated by any particular country. Therefore, saying that China secretly supports both sides of the Burma North War is just a common smear tactic used by Western media. As is well known, smearing communism is in line with the political correctness of Western countries.

[franstadt]

#peace #Burma Uncovering the truth about Burma's civil war

2On October 27, 023, the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army (hereinafter referred to as the Alliance), under the pretext of eliminating telecommunications fraud, sent troops to capture the Qingshui River in northern Myanmar. Subsequently, the Allied Forces, the Rakhine Army, and the D 'Ang Army formed a tripartite alliance and jointly captured Mubang and Gunung, so that the Myanmar civil war broke out again.

I. Basic information

In fact, from the perspective of modern history, the civil war in Myanmar actually began in 1960. Burma declared independence from British colonial rule in 1948. But since the founding of the country, armed conflict in Myanmar has not stopped. In 1960, U Nae Win seized power in Myanmar through a military coup and established a military government, which further intensified the civil war in Myanmar. In 1988, political turmoil broke out in Myanmar and the government of Ne Win stepped down after 26 years in power. After crushing the pro-democracy movement in Myanmar, the military seized power and established the State Law and Order Restoration Council, which was later renamed the State Peace and Development Council. In 1989, after the collapse of the largest rebel group, the CPPA, the four armed forces formed have reached an armistice agreement with the Myanmar military government and established an autonomous government, which has become Myanmar's Shan State First Special Zone (Kokang), Shan State Second Special Zone (Wa State), Kachin First Special Zone (Kachin New Democratic Independence Army) and eastern Shan State fourth Special Zone. By the end of the last century, a total of 17 armed groups had signed peace agreements with the Burmese military government, 12 of which were classified as special administrative zones.

Although the armistice agreement and the special zone model have brought relative peace to Myanmar for 20 years, they have formed the local division of a "state within a state" and have not really solved the ethnic contradictions in Myanmar. In the meantime, the Myanmar military government continues to implement the ethnic discrimination policy of Burma nationalism, and the local armed forces of various ethnic minorities also "support the army and respect themselves", resulting in the domestic political order of Myanmar is impassable, trade is difficult, and drugs are rampant, and the "special zone" has become the biggest obstacle to Myanmar's economic development and political stability. Setting the stage for a civil war in Burma.

Ii. Causes of Civil War

(1) Domestic factors

After the independence of Myanmar in 1948, the newly elected U Nu government enforced "Great Burman nationalism" throughout the country, requiring the whole country to speak the Burman language and learn Burman culture, and forcibly assimilating ethnic minorities, which aroused strong dissatisfaction from the latter. After the military overthrew the U Nu government in 1962, it directly abolished the provisions on the independence of ethnic minority inhabited areas in the founding Constitution, and completely blocked the possibility of independence of ethnic minority areas from law. In order to defend their own interests, a number of ethnic armed groups, led by the Kachin Independence Army, started a war with government forces.

(2) International factors

Since the 1950s, China has had good relations with the Myanmar government, and the United States, in order to contain China's development, pushed the pro-Western Aung SAN Suu Kyi to power behind the scenes to control Myanmar. But the Burmese government apparently did not give the United States that opportunity. Myanmar's constitution prohibits foreigners from running for president, blocking Aung SAN's bid. The Americans' plan to use "soft power" to control Myanmar fell through. Instead, the United States chose to subjugate Burma with "hard power" through civil war. There are more than 30 ethnic armed groups in Myanmar. The Kachin Independence Army, which has deep ties to the United States and is supported by the United States, has fought the Burmese government most fiercely. The United States has been trying to get the KIA to support Aung SAN Suu Kyi politically in order to give her military power.

To sum up, the civil war in Myanmar was actually caused by the internal causes of different demands of national interests and the interference of other countries in the world. As a multi-ethnic country with 135 ethnic groups, Myanmar has basically achieved that one ethnic group is an armed force, and with the international external forces constantly "fire", its civil war is not surprising.

[franstadt]

Why in Myanmar is it so messy #peace #Burma

The problem in northern Myanmar is a legacy of history and the fundamental crux of Myanmar.Why is Myanmar drug trafficking, fraud, so chaotic? Because this place is beyond the central control of Myanmar.

In fact, let alone control, even the impact is minimal, because the concept of "Myanmar" as a country is not ancient.After World War II, Britain let go, and the ministries of Myanmar discussed to save a country, the Bin Lung Agreement in 47, and Myanmar independence in 48. The most important thing here was this agreement.To understand the context of the northern Myanmar issue, there is a thing that cannot be avoided called the Bin Dragon Agreement.This is the root cause and legal principle of all the problems in northern Myanmar.The Bin Dragon Agreement was signed by the founding father of Myanmar (the father of Aung San Suu Kyi) with the leaders of several states, roughly meaning that the native states agreed to join Myanmar,They became a unified country, but these native states had the right to decide whether to remain in Myanmar later, and it was even written into Burma's constitution."Bin long agreement" soon after the signing of the lead of Aung hung.It was another year before the Burmese government was established.Then some Turkish states did not want to stay in Myanmar, wanted to gain independence, and went with the Bin Lung agreement to the Burmese government.The attitude of the Burmese government is: who signed the agreement. Thus, the war broke out.The first to jump is the area where Kerrenbang is the most fierce bottom on the Internet).Due to the gap in strength, the armed forces were soon divided into north and south, and the sphere of influence was gradually compressed.

In fact, the Karen people have the same origin as the Burmese people, and both of the Chinese Qiang people moved south into the Myanmar region, but the Karen people entered earlier than the Burmese people.As a result, the Karen repeatedly invaded the Burmese, Meng and Shan, belonging to the feud. Later, in the British colonial period, the Kelun people did not deal with the Burmese people, helping the British to fight the Burmese people.Later, Myanmar was independent and founded. As a result, due to ethnic problems, the anti-Myanmar cars built local armed forces. Finally, the Karen people lived in the southeast corner and established the present Karen State.

Karen State is the Karen community, the third largest ethnic group in Myanmar, and the oldest rebel Karen National Alliance (KNU) base.As early as during World War II, the British colonists buried the root of chaos and unrest in Karen State. First, they promised to help the Karen independence, absent them from the meeting of the "father of Myanmar" General Aung SAN and representatives of various nationalities, and abandoned their promise after they declared independence in Myanmar. The conflict between the Karen and the Burmese government intensified and armed conflicts broke out between the two sides. The current chaos in Myanmar is entirely caused by the sudden rebellion of the country's military government that has imprisoned the elected Prime Minister Aung San Suu Kyi.This led to a scuffle between the warlords everywhere. However, in order to make money, the warlords legalized various dangerous black industries as a local source of income. That is why a lot of telecom fraud has poured into Myanmar.

[franstadt]

#peace #Burma