journalsnyou-blog

[journalsnyou-blog]

8 Reasons Why Desalination and Water Treatment (DWT) Might Have Rejected Your Article

Desalination and Water Treatment (DWT), published by Taylor and Francis, is one of the major journals to exist in the 21st century. DWT covers topics mostly concerning to articles which revolve around water treatment, desalination, new sources of drinking water, etc.

Desalination and Water Treatment (DWT) has decently strict guidelines which you need to adhere to. You can find a Desalination and Water Treatment template here.

So, here are 8 reasons why your article might have been rejected by Desalination and Water Treatment (DWT):

It fails the technical screening (e.g. figures or references are not complete).

It does not fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal.

It's incomplete (e.g. article contains observations but is not a full study).

The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective (e.g. the study lacks clear control groups or other comparison metrics).

The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.

It's simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.

It's incomprehensible (e.g. the language, structure, or figures are poor).

It's boring.

Nonetheless, you should always give it your best shot. A journal rejecting your paper doesn’t mean that your paper isn’t important or it can’t be used by other researchers as a reference.

[journalsnyou-blog]

8 Reasons Why Journal of Materials Science Might Have Rejected Your Article

Journal of Materials Science, published by the Springer, is one of the major journals to exist in the 21st century. JMS by Springer covers a wide variety of topics and hence is quite popular among budding researchers.

Journal of Materials Science has decently strict guidelines which you need to adhere to. You can find a Journal of Materials Science template here.

So, here are 8 reasons why your article might have been rejected by Journal of Materials Science:

It fails the technical screening (e.g. figures or references are not complete).

It does not fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal.

It's incomplete (e.g. article contains observations but is not a full study).

The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective (e.g. the study lacks clear control groups or other comparison metrics).

The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.

It's simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.

It's incomprehensible (e.g. the language, structure, or figures are poor).

It's boring.

Nonetheless, you should always give it your best shot. A journal rejecting your paper doesn’t mean that your paper isn’t important or it can’t be used by other researchers as a reference. ​

[journalsnyou-blog]

8 Reasons Why Nature Communications (NComms) Might Have Rejected Your Article

Nature Communications, published by Nature, is one of the top journals to exist in the 21st century. NComms covers a wide variety of scientific topics and hence is quite popular among all researchers.

Nature Communications has decently strict guidelines which you need to adhere to. You can find a Nature Communications template here.

So, here are 8 reasons why your article might have been rejected by Nature Communications:

It fails the technical screening (e.g. figures or references are not complete).

It does not fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal.

It's incomplete (e.g. article contains observations but is not a full study).

The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective (e.g. the study lacks clear control groups or other comparison metrics).

The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.

It's simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.

It's incomprehensible (e.g. the language, structure, or figures are poor).

It's boring.

Nonetheless, you should always give it your best shot. A journal rejecting your paper doesn’t mean that your paper isn’t important or it can’t be used by other researchers as a reference.

[journalsnyou-blog]

8 Reasons Why the Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) Might Have Rejected Your Article

Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR), published by AGU, is one of the major journals to exist in the 21st century. Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) is regarded as one of the top journals in the field of Geology. It publishes 7 journals on 7 different topics.

Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) has decently strict guidelines which you need to adhere to. You can find a JGR template here.

So, here are 8 reasons why your article might have been rejected by Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR):

It fails the technical screening (e.g. figures or references are not complete).

It does not fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal.

It's incomplete (e.g. article contains observations but is not a full study).

The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective (e.g. the study lacks clear control groups or other comparison metrics).

The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.

It's simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.

It's incomprehensible (e.g. the language, structure, or figures are poor).

It's boring.

Nonetheless, you should always give it your best shot. A journal rejecting your paper doesn’t mean that your paper isn’t important or it can’t be used by other researchers as a reference. 

[journalsnyou-blog]

8 Reasons Why The BMJ Might Have Rejected Your Article

The BMJ, published by the BMJ Publishing Group, is one of the major journals to exist in the 21st century. The BMJ is regarded as the ace journal for publishing medical papers. The BMJ impact factor is unimaginably high; it’s 20.7.

The BMJ has decently strict guidelines which you need to adhere to. You can find a The BMJ template here.

So, here are 8 reasons why your article might have been rejected by The BMJ:

It fails the technical screening (e.g. figures or references are not complete).

It does not fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal.

It's incomplete (e.g. article contains observations but is not a full study).

The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective (e.g. the study lacks clear control groups or other comparison metrics).

The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.

It's simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.

It's incomprehensible (e.g. the language, structure, or figures are poor).

It's boring.

Nonetheless, you should always give it your best shot. A journal rejecting your paper doesn’t mean that your paper isn’t important or it can’t be used by other researchers as a reference.

​

[journalsnyou-blog]

8 Reasons Why PLOS ONE Might Have Rejected Your Article

PLOS ONE, published by the Public Library of Science, is one of the major journals to exist in the 21st century. PLOS covers a wide variety of topics and hence is quite popular among budding researchers.

PLOS ONE has decently strict guidelines which you need to adhere to. You can find a PLOS ONE template here.

So, here are 8 reasons why your article might have been rejected by PLOS ONE:

It fails the technical screening (e.g. figures or references are not complete).

It does not fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal.

It's incomplete (e.g. article contains observations but is not a full study).

The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective (e.g. the study lacks clear control groups or other comparison metrics).

The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.

It's simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.

It's incomprehensible (e.g. the language, structure, or figures are poor).

It's boring.

Nonetheless, you should always give it your best shot. A journal rejecting your paper doesn’t mean that your paper isn’t important or it can’t be used by other researchers as a reference.

[journalsnyou-blog]

6 Things You Can Do Better When PLOS ONE Rejects Your Paper

Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. We know the pain. After all the sleepless nights you spent trying to get all the aspects right get published in PLOS ONE, one of the top journals in the 21st century. There can be multiple reasons why your paper was rejected.

More often than not, you can’t pinpoint the reason that made PLOS ONE reject your paper. It’s just because they don’t provide enough feedback. Feedback comes in the form of, “you didn’t follow the journal guidelines properly”, “your research isn’t really useful for the domain”, and other inconclusive bases.

To avoid being rejected in the first place, we have listed down some of the key elements you need to follow when writing your manuscript. They are the following:

Create research on value and impact: When considering to write for PLOS ONE, you should focus on building research which can benefit the domain and address gaps that haven’t been addressed before.

Follow the PLOS ONE guidelines diligently: This is the most crucial point you, as a researcher, need to address. Statistics suggest that “not following journal guidelines” is one of the key reasons why they reject papers. Also, most researchers just skim through the guidelines without actually reading through them thoroughly which might contribute to missing out on key elements mentioned in the guidelines. If you have a ready PLOS ONE template which already adheres to the guidelines, it’s even better.

Establish a strong case: You must clearly present your data; your paper should show a smooth transition from the data to drawing out conclusions from the same without any invalid or un-validated assumptions. You should use clear and identifiable methods and procedures to arrive at conclusions.

Use great references: Always use references from good resources with a high impact factor. It’d be great if you use references from journals which have a close or even more than PLOS ONE’s impact factor.

Start small: Instead of publishing a full-fledged original paper, it’s better to write review pieces. Publishers and journals love putting them up. As a budding researcher, it’s easier to review a recently published article and get a better understanding of the publishing system.

Don’t beat around the bush: We researchers tend to address multiples theories into one paper and send it for publishing. That’s very natural as publishing in itself is a big hassle. Unfortunately, that’s a red flag for top journals like PLOS ONE. It’s better to stick to the core idea of the research throughout the paper and add stuff which actually complements the core idea.

[journalsnyou-blog]

6 Things You Can Do Better When The BMJ Rejects Your Paper

Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. We know the pain. After all the sleepless nights you spent trying to get all the aspects right get published in The BMJ, one of the top journals in the 21st century. There can be multiple reasons why your paper was rejected.

More often than not, you can’t pinpoint the reason that made The BMJ reject your paper. It’s just because they don’t provide enough feedback. Feedback comes in the form of, “you didn’t follow the journal guidelines properly”, “your research isn’t really useful for the domain”, and other inconclusive bases.

To avoid being rejected in the first place, we have listed down some of the key elements you need to follow when writing your manuscript. They are the following:

Create research on value and impact: When considering to write for The BMJ, you should focus on building research which can benefit the domain and address gaps that haven’t been addressed before.

Follow The BMJ guidelines diligently: This is the most crucial point you, as a researcher, need to address. Statistics suggest that “not following journal guidelines” is one of the key reasons why they reject papers. Also, most researchers just skim through the guidelines without actually reading through them thoroughly which might contribute to missing out on key elements mentioned in the guidelines. If you have a ready The BMJ template which already adheres to the guidelines, it’s even better.

Establish a strong case: You must clearly present your data; your paper should show a smooth transition from the data to drawing out conclusions from the same without any invalid or un-validated assumptions. You should use clear and identifiable methods and procedures to arrive at conclusions.

Use great references: Always use references from good resources with a high impact factor. It’d be great if you use references from journals which have a close or even more than The BMJ’s impact factor.

Start small: Instead of publishing a full-fledged original paper, it’s better to write review pieces. Publishers and journals love putting them up. As a budding researcher, it’s easier to review a recently published article and get a better understanding of the publishing system.

Don’t beat around the bush: We researchers tend to address multiples theories into one paper and send it for publishing. That’s very natural as publishing in itself is a big hassle. Unfortunately, that’s a red flag for top journals like The BMJ. It’s better to stick to the core idea of the research throughout the paper and add stuff which actually complements the core idea.

[journalsnyou-blog]

6 Things You Can Do Better When Desalination and Water Treatment Rejects Your Paper

Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. We know the pain. After all the sleepless nights you spent trying to get all the aspects right get published in Desalination and Water Treatment by Taylor & Francis, one of the top journals in the 21st century. There can be multiple reasons why your paper was rejected.

More often than not, you can’t pinpoint the reason that made Desalination and Water Treatment reject your paper. It’s just because they don’t provide enough feedback. Feedback comes in the form of, “you didn’t follow the journal guidelines properly”, “your research isn’t really useful for the domain”, and other inconclusive bases.

To avoid being rejected in the first place, we have listed down some of the key elements you need to follow when writing your manuscript. They are the following:

Create research of value and impact: When considering to write for Desalination and Water Treatment, you should focus on building research which can benefit the domain and address gaps that haven’t been addressed before.

Follow the Desalination and Water Treatment guidelines diligently: This is the most crucial point you, as a researcher, need to address. Statistics suggest that “not following journal guidelines” is one of the key reasons why they reject papers. Also, most researchers just skim through the guidelines without actually reading through them thoroughly which might contribute to missing out on key elements mentioned in the guidelines. If you have a ready Desalination and Water Treatment template which already adheres to the guidelines, it’s even better.

Establish a strong case: You must clearly present your data; your paper should show a smooth transition from the data to drawing out conclusions from the same without any invalid or un-validated assumptions. You should use clear and identifiable methods and procedures to arrive at conclusions.

Use great references: Always use references from good resources with a high impact factor. It’d be great if you use references from journals which have a close or even more than Desalination and Water Treatment’s impact factor.

Start small: Instead of publishing a full-fledged original paper, it’s better to write review pieces. Publishers and journals love putting them up. As a budding researcher, it’s easier to review a recently published article and get a better understanding of the publishing system.

Don’t beat around the bush: We researchers tend to address multiples theories into one paper and send it for publishing. That’s very natural as publishing in itself is a big hassle. Unfortunately, that’s a red flag for top journals like Desalination and Water Treatment. It’s better to stick to the core idea of the research throughout the paper and add stuff which actually complements the core idea.

[journalsnyou-blog]

6 Things You Can Do Better When Journal of Materials Science (by Springer) Rejects Your Paper

Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. We know the pain. After all the sleepless nights you spent trying to get all the aspects right get published in Journal of Materials Science by Springer, one of the top journals in the 21st century. There can be multiple reasons why your paper was rejected.

More often than not, you can’t pinpoint the reason that made Journal of Materials Science reject your paper. It’s just because they don’t provide enough feedback. Feedback comes in the form of, “you didn’t follow the journal guidelines properly”, “your research isn’t really useful for the domain”, and other inconclusive bases.

To avoid being rejected in the first place, we have listed down some of the key elements you need to follow when writing your manuscript. They are the following:

Create research of value and impact: When considering to write for Journal of Materials Science, you should focus on building research which can benefit the domain and address gaps that haven’t been addressed before.

Follow the Journal of Materials Science guidelines diligently: This is the most crucial point you, as a researcher, need to address. Statistics suggest that “not following journal guidelines” is one of the key reasons why they reject papers. Also, most researchers just skim through the guidelines without actually reading through them thoroughly which might contribute to missing out on key elements mentioned in the guidelines. If you have a ready Journal of Materials Science template which already adheres to the guidelines, it’s even better.

Establish a strong case: You must clearly present your data; your paper should show a smooth transition from the data to drawing out conclusions from the same without any invalid or un-validated assumptions. You should use clear and identifiable methods and procedures to arrive at conclusions.

Use great references: Always use references from good resources with a high impact factor. It’d be great if you use references from journals which have a close or even more than Journal of Materials Science’s impact factor.

Start small: Instead of publishing a full-fledged original paper, it’s better to write review pieces. Publishers and journals love putting them up. As a budding researcher, it’s easier to review a recently published article and get a better understanding of the publishing system.

Don’t beat around the bush: We researchers tend to address multiples theories into one paper and send it for publishing. That’s very natural as publishing in itself is a big hassle. Unfortunately, that’s a red flag for top journals like Journal of Materials Science. It’s better to stick to the core idea of the research throughout the paper and add stuff which actually complements the core idea.

[journalsnyou-blog]

6 Things You Can Do Better When Nature Communications Rejects Your Paper

Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. We know the pain. After all the sleepless nights you spent trying to get all the aspects right get published in Nature Communications, one of the top journals in the 21st century. There can be multiple reasons why your paper was rejected.

More often than not, you can’t pinpoint the reason that made Nature Communications reject your paper. It’s just because they don’t provide enough feedback. Feedback comes in the form of, “you didn’t follow the journal guidelines properly”, “your research isn’t really useful for the domain”, and other inconclusive bases.

To avoid being rejected in the first place, we have listed down some of the key elements you need to follow when writing your manuscript. They are the following:

Create research of value and impact: When considering to write for Nature Communications, you should focus on building research which can benefit the domain and address gaps that haven’t been addressed before.

Follow the Nature Communications guidelines diligently: This is the most crucial point you, as a researcher, need to address. Statistics suggest that “not following journal guidelines” is one of the key reasons why they reject papers. Also, most researchers just skim through the guidelines without actually reading through them thoroughly which might contribute to missing out on key elements mentioned in the guidelines. If you have a ready Nature Communications template which already adheres to the guidelines, it’s even better.

Establish a strong case: You must clearly present your data; your paper should show a smooth transition from the data to drawing out conclusions from the same without any invalid or un-validated assumptions. You should use clear and identifiable methods and procedures to arrive at conclusions.

Use great references: Always use references from good resources with a high impact factor. It’d be great if you use references from journals which have a close or even more than Nature Communications’s impact factor.

Start small: Instead of publishing a full-fledged original paper, it’s better to write review pieces. Publishers and journals love putting them up. As a budding researcher, it’s easier to review a recently published article and get a better understanding of the publishing system.

Don’t beat around the bush: We researchers tend to address multiples theories into one paper and send it for publishing. That’s very natural as publishing in itself is a big hassle. Unfortunately, that’s a red flag for top journals like Nature Communications. It’s better to stick to the core idea of the research throughout the paper and add stuff which actually complements the core idea.

[journalsnyou-blog]

6 Things You Can Do Better When Journal of Geophysical Research Rejects Your Paper

Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. We know the pain. After all the sleepless nights you spent trying to get all the aspects right get published in Journal of Geophysical Research, one of the top journals in the 21st century. There can be multiple reasons why your paper was rejected.

More often than not, you can’t pinpoint the reason that made Journal of Geophysical Research reject your paper. It’s just because they don’t provide enough feedback. Feedback comes in the form of, “you didn’t follow the journal guidelines properly”, “your research isn’t really useful for the domain”, and other inconclusive bases.

To avoid being rejected in the first place, we have listed down some of key elements you need to follow when writing your manuscript. They are the following:

Create research of value and impact: When considering to write for Journal of Geophysical Research, you should focus on building research which can benefit the domain and address gaps that haven’t been addressed before.

Follow the Journal of Geophysical Research guidelines diligently: This is the most crucial point you, as a researcher, need to address. Statistics suggest that “not following journal guidelines” is one of the key reasons why they reject papers. Also, most researchers just skim through the guidelines without actually reading through them thoroughly which might contribute to missing out on key elements mentioned in the guidelines. If you have a ready Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) template which already adheres to the guidelines, it’s even better.

Establish a strong case: You must clearly present your data; your paper should show a smooth transition from the data to drawing out conclusions from the same without any invalid or un-validated assumptions. You should use clear and identifiable methods and procedures to arrive at conclusions.

Use great references: Always use references from good resources with a high impact factor. It’d be great if you use references from journals which have a close or even more than Journal of Geophysical Research’s impact factor.

Start small: Instead of publishing a full-fledged original paper, it’s better to write review pieces. Publishers and journals love putting them up. As a budding researcher, it’s easier to review a recently published article and get a better understanding of the publishing system.

Don’t beat around the bush: We researchers tend to address multiples theories into one paper and send it for publishing. That’s very natural as publishing in itself is a big hassle. Unfortunately, that’s a red flag for top journals like Journal of Geophysical Research. It’s better to stick to the core idea of the research throughout the paper and add stuff which actually complements the core idea.

[journalsnyou-blog]

Some of the Top Articles Published in PLOS ONE

We are all aware of the renowned journal PLOS ONE. PLOS ONE has been there in the industry for quite long and has amassed a great deal of reputation in all fields of study. Being a diversified journal, it attracts a huge number of paper submissions each year. It’s also popular among researchers due to its high acceptance rate.

So, if you’re looking to submit an article here, you would be needing to follow all the guidelines and the prescribed PLOS ONE template. Having said that, let’s look at some of the top articles published in PLOS ONE which has an impact factor of 2.806.

Designer Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds for Adult Mouse Neural Stem Cell 3-Dimensional Cultures

Regional Decline of Coral Cover in the Indo-Pacific: Timing, Extent, and Subregional Comparisons

Gut Microbiota in Human Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Differs from Non-Diabetic Adults

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments

The Human Serum Metabolome

Trans-Synaptic Spread of Tau Pathology In Vivo

Plastic Pollution in the World’s Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea

Proton Pump Inhibitor Usage and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction in the General Population

[journalsnyou-blog]

Some of the Top Articles Published in The BMJ

We are all aware of the renowned journal The BMJ. The BMJ has been there in the industry for quite long and has amassed a great deal of reputation in the medical community. Being a very successful journal, it attracts a huge number of paper submissions each year. It’s also popular among researchers due to its intense peer-review process and quality of papers published.

So, if you’re looking to submit an article here, you would be needing to follow all the guidelines and the prescribed The BMJ template. Having said that, let’s look at some of the top articles published in The BMJ which has an unimaginable impact factor of 20.7.

Chronic refractory myofascial pain and denervation supersensitivity as global public health disease

Acute strokes in the setting of a persistent primitive trigeminal artery

Successful autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) in previously failed paediatric limbal transplantation for ocular surface burns

Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in a patient with surfactant protein C deficiency presenting with severe neonatal respiratory distress

Percutaneous treatment of symptomatic aneurysmal bone cyst of L5 by percutaneous injection of osteoconductive material (Cerament)

Obstruction and perforation of the small bowel caused by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pill pack in an elderly patient

In-vivo expansion of autologous limbal stem cell using simple limbal epithelial transplantation for treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency

Hydroxocobalamin treatment of acute cyanide poisoning from apricot kernels

Columella pressure necrosis: a method of surgical reconstruction and its long-term outcome

Rapid-onset obesity with hypothalamic dysfunction, hypoventilation and autonomic dysregulation (ROHHAD): a case with additional features and review of the literature

[journalsnyou-blog]

Some of the Top Articles Published in Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR)

We are all aware of the renowned journal Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR). Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) has been there in the industry for quite long and has amassed a great deal of reputation in the scientific community.

Being a very successful journal, it attracts a huge number of paper submissions each year. It’s also popular among researchers due to its thorough peer-review process and quality of papers published.

So, if you’re looking to submit an article here, you would be needing to follow all the guidelines and the prescribed Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) template. Having said that, let’s look at some of the top articles published in the JGR which has an impact factor of 3.44.

Atmospheric limitations on electronic distance‐measuring equipment

Physical principles of the electro‐optical determination of distances

The geodimeter system: A short discussion of its principal function and future development

Sulfur in the atmosphere

Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes

Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces

Limit on stably trapped particle fluxes

[journalsnyou-blog]

Some of the Top Articles Published in Desalination and Water Treatment

We are all aware of the renowned journal Desalination and Water Treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment has been there in the industry for quite long and has amassed a great deal of reputation in the scientific community working on water desalination and exploring new resources for drinking water.

Being a very successful journal, it attracts a huge number of paper submissions each year. It’s also popular among researchers due to its thorough peer-review process and quality of papers published.

So, if you’re looking to submit an article here, you would be needing to follow all the guidelines and the prescribed Desalination and Water Treatment template. Having said that, let’s look at some of the top articles published in the DWT which has an impact factor of 1.61.

Thermophysical properties of seawater: a review of existing correlations and data

Degradation of wastewaters containing organic dyes photocatalysed by zinc oxide: a review

Nanocomposite of carbon nanotubes/silica nanoparticles and their use for adsorption of Pb(II): from surface properties to sorption mechanism

Power generation with salinity gradient by pressure retarded osmosis using concentrated brine from SWRO system and treated sewage as pure water

Optimization of Cr(VI) removal onto biosorbent eggshell membrane: experimental & theoretical approaches

A review of draw solutes in forward osmosis process and their use in modern applications

Separation of chromium from water samples using eggshell powder as a low-cost sorbent: kinetic and thermodynamic studies

Utilization of bottom ash as a low-cost sorbent for the removal and recovery of a toxic halogen containing dye eosin yellow

Energy consumption and recovery in reverse osmosis

Modification of Hibiscus cannabinus fiber by graft copolymerization: application for dye removal

[journalsnyou-blog]

Some of the Top Articles Published in Journal of Materials Science (by Springer)

We are all aware of the renowned journal Journal of Materials Science. Journal of Materials Science has been there in the industry for quite long and has amassed a great deal of reputation in the scientific community working on material sciences.

Being a very successful journal, it attracts a huge number of paper submissions each year. It’s also popular among researchers due to its thorough peer-review process and quality of papers published.

So, if you’re looking to submit an article here, you would be needing to follow all the guidelines and the prescribed Journal of Materials Science template. Having said that, let’s look at some of the top articles published in the JMS (by Springer) which has an impact factor of 1.61.

Evaluation of silica aerogel-reinforced polyurethane foams for footwear applications

Examination of alkali-activated material nanostructure during thermal treatment

Computational investigations of Cu-embedded MoS2 sheet for CO oxidation catalysis

Terminology: the first step towards international standardisation of graphene and related 2D materials

Low-temperature growth of boron carbide coatings by direct current magnetron sputtering and high-power impulse magnetron sputtering

Enhanced specific capacitance and supercapacitive properties of polyaniline–iron oxide (PANI–Fe2O3) composite electrode material

Three-dimensional phase-field simulation of microstructural evolution in three-phase materials with different interfacial energies and different diffusivities

Preparation and properties of metal-containing polyamide hybrid composites via reactive microencapsulation