kirasinful

[kirasinful]

got ink?

[kirasinful]

i like this one a lot

[kirasinful]

[kirasinful]

gadzooks! my game? It be'eth changed!

[kirasinful]

“Those poor boys”

“She deserves to be punished too.”

“I’m not saying I support rape, but-”

“Sorry to say - she deserved it.”

“She put herself in harm’s way”

“But if she was fingered, then that’s not rape.”

“She ruined their lives.”

[kirasinful]

the shimp got too much attention and now there are transphobes in my notes, this is a transgender blog run by a transgender dyke. fuckers.

[kirasinful]

(Dex is owned by @ghoulcandy)

[kirasinful]

forever dm: i have no idea why i got stuck dming everything we do forever dm: so anyway who wants to play in my new oneshot that i just developed for no reason without anyone asking for it?

[kirasinful]

beautiful names for a baby girl:

- Jelita (like a fancy form of Julia)

- Melina (means raspberry in polish 😍)

- Morenka (so cute you could call her Rennie)

[kirasinful]

You stole a cursed artifact. You knew it was cursed, you actually stole it specifically because of its curse, but the curse does not seem to be affecting you.

[kirasinful]

parent: my son is fine

excuse me, but your daughter is starting to idolize the idea of being a plant’s pet

[kirasinful]

gender is a construct and baby I get +1/+1 for each artifact I control

[kirasinful]

Polyam possessiveness can be so hot. "You're mine, but I choose to share you, anyway. I own you, so I love to see you happy. Mine, but not mine alone. I love you, and I want to share that love with the world."

[kirasinful]

the concept of someone you’re into masturbating to the thought of you really is just one of the absolute hottest things ever

[kirasinful]

Polyam possessiveness can be so hot. "You're mine, but I choose to share you, anyway. I own you, so I love to see you happy. Mine, but not mine alone. I love you, and I want to share that love with the world."

[kirasinful]

*inhales*

YOU ARE THE FUCKING PACKAGE THAT GENERATED THIS FILE, IN THE FILE FORMAT THAT IS ONLY USED BY YOUR SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS

I HAVE NOT TOUCHED THE FUCKING METADATA

WHY THE EVERLASTING GOD ON FUCK ARE YOU CLAIMING THAT YOU CAN'T PARSE THE FUCKING HEADER

YOU MADE THIS

*exhales*

Oh my fucking GOD these stupid fucking bioinformatics packages that are put out by a grad student 10 fucking years ago and then just fucking sit there are fucking WILD and it's MY fucking job to chain them together like a stupid fucking duct taped together human centipede of bash, python, and R

[kirasinful]

the thing about "age gap" discourse is that it's all framed in this way that carefully fails to account anywhere for the structure of patriarchy, instead cleverly hiding it in the background like furniture.

"i think wide age gaps are problematic" is framed as if it's a general concern. but if you ask for an example they will ALWAYS reach first for the case of an older man and a younger woman. this is meant to read as being self-evidently in favor of their point of view, but it only works that way if you fail to ask why it is self-evident that an older man would hold such disproportionate power.

why? is it perhaps the case that men tend in general to accrue more power & wealth & influence & position as they age? does that phenomenon arise naturally or are we perhaps talking around some other set of explicable social phenomena? is there some reason why, as is heavily implied by your argument, women do not accrue the aforementioned advantages as they age in the same way? without arguing that the relationship you describe either is or is not "problematic," can we examine whether we are framing correctly what exactly might be problematic about it? in this example, age is used as a convenient synecdoche that stands in for all the privilege that typically accrues to men as time goes on and as they advance within the patriarchal hierarchies woven into their personal and professional lives: a youth becomes a family patriarch, a bachelor becomes head of a household, a junior clerk becomes a C-suite suit. a woman, in the equivalent time, does not accrue patriarchal privilege as she ages -- in fact, absent other factors, her power (& value, since her only power under patriarchy is her value) decline the older she gets. lumping all this under "age gap" is not just simplistic, it's wrong.

this is illustrated in counterexample by the fact that when people who are fixated on "age gaps" give an example with an older woman and a younger man, they never fail to get more specific and make her his teacher, or his babysitter (current or ex-), or to specify this time that she is wealthy and he is destitute. it becomes obvious that once again, age is a stand-in in each case for some other differential of power -- structural power within the institution of the school for the teacher, the dyadic mentor/mentee carer/cared-for dynamic for the babysitter, and the simple familiar gulf between wealth and poverty for the rich woman.

the people fixated on "age gaps" either won't mention queer relationships at all because they raise inconvenient questions, or they'll actually come out and say "well it's kinda different for queer people and i can't weigh in uwu," or they'll go mask-off reactionary and invoke the specter of queer grooming to drive their point home. it makes little difference.

every statistic shows that people who own horses have excellent health outcomes. thinking about this for even two seconds should make clear that this is because only rich people own horses and rich people get excellent healthcare; the horses have nothing to do with it. the people who are worried about "age gaps" aren't even always wrong that there's a problematic power difference in a relationship, but their analysis of why that is makes about as much sense as "a horse every day keeps the doctor away" makes as medical advice.

say what you fucking mean.