neuship-zone

[neuship-zone]

On another note, this kinda sucks, because it feels like I have to do 50 background checks on every blog that seems cool, because maybe they're cool with gaybians but not honeybee transfems/coffee bean transmascs, or maybe they are but they're not cool with physical nonhumans, or maybe they are but they're not cool with endos, or maybe they are but they're not cool with....

And if they say "proship DNI" or "pedos DNI" I have to wonder if I'm still going to get annihilated or not for having a Certain Opinion or a Certain Headmate (cough cough), so I'm forced to interact with caution or just not interact in the first place.

And by time I cross out every single blog I can't safely interact with, I'm left with the people who post explicit loli art and the radqueers. So I have to choose between interacting with NSFW blogs as a minor, people who support identities I am critical of, and pretending to be Normal like I do in everyday life just so I can interact with the blogs that would otherwise call me a pedo and block me on site.

Life is fun.

Was trying to navigate through various blogs' DNIs (because I must not accidentally cross someone's Internet boundaries or else I am a Horrible Person[TM]) and I've come to realise that "pedos DNI" is actually a dogwhistle, because some mfers haven't realised that attraction to fictional characters is not equivalent to being a pedo, or that the All Pedos Must Die mentality is bad.

Someone reblogged an entire chain of people saying what was along the lines of "If you support pedophilia get off this blog". Usually I don't care too much because these people usually mean "child predators" when they say "pedophilia" and I in fact do not support predators. Except that everyone in this reblog chain had the shittiest takes I've ever seen.

"Pedophilia is not a kink" Well technically all paraphilias are kinks, so you're wrong, but because pedophilia is one of the big 3, it can't be acted on in the same way something tame like dacryphilia can.

"Pedophilia is not a mental illness" Well no, paraphilias on their own aren't mental illnesses, but people with pedophilic disorders are absolutely mentally ill, and to deny them that recognition is crazy. Also you are absolutely not saying this with good intentions.

"If you're a pedo, please turn yourself to the police because you don't deserve to walk the streets" I shouldn't need to tell you why This Is Bad. But just to clarify, telling people to turn themselves to the police is bad on its own, considering everyone on this site understands that ACAB. Now realise that you are asking people to turn themselves into an institution that is going to brutalise them for....having an attraction. "But it's wrong-" Hey so having thoughts about harming children, and ACTUALLY harming children are two different things. Istg-

And if that wasn't bad enough, in the same reblog chain, someone running a poll account came to complain about people submitting underaged fictional characters. Underage FICTIONAL characters. In a reblog chain about pedophilia.

Now the person in question is a CSA survivor, so I give them the benefit of the doubt, because fiction absolutely has the power to trigger IRL trauma. I, however, do not give them the pass to make a shitty "liking this in fiction = liking this is reality" reblog.

If you are talking about the sexualisation of FICTIONAL children, you are talking about kodacons, NOT pedos. I don't care if they have overlap. I don't care if you hate both groups. They are different. If you don't want kodacons interacting with you, fucking SAY THAT. Don't hide under "pedos DNI" you fucking coward. If nothing else, do that so that I can know to avoid your landmine of a blog.

Alright rant over y'all can chill now.

[neuship-zone]

Was trying to navigate through various blogs' DNIs (because I must not accidentally cross someone's Internet boundaries or else I am a Horrible Person[TM]) and I've come to realise that "pedos DNI" is actually a dogwhistle, because some mfers haven't realised that attraction to fictional characters is not equivalent to being a pedo, or that the All Pedos Must Die mentality is bad.

Someone reblogged an entire chain of people saying what was along the lines of "If you support pedophilia get off this blog". Usually I don't care too much because these people usually mean "child predators" when they say "pedophilia" and I in fact do not support predators. Except that everyone in this reblog chain had the shittiest takes I've ever seen.

"Pedophilia is not a kink" Well technically all paraphilias are kinks, so you're wrong, but because pedophilia is one of the big 3, it can't be acted on in the same way something tame like dacryphilia can.

"Pedophilia is not a mental illness" Well no, paraphilias on their own aren't mental illnesses, but people with pedophilic disorders are absolutely mentally ill, and to deny them that recognition is crazy. Also you are absolutely not saying this with good intentions.

"If you're a pedo, please turn yourself to the police because you don't deserve to walk the streets" I shouldn't need to tell you why This Is Bad. But just to clarify, telling people to turn themselves to the police is bad on its own, considering everyone on this site understands that ACAB. Now realise that you are asking people to turn themselves into an institution that is going to brutalise them for....having an attraction. "But it's wrong-" Hey so having thoughts about harming children, and ACTUALLY harming children are two different things. Istg-

And if that wasn't bad enough, in the same reblog chain, someone running a poll account came to complain about people submitting underaged fictional characters. Underage FICTIONAL characters. In a reblog chain about pedophilia.

Now the person in question is a CSA survivor, so I give them the benefit of the doubt, because fiction absolutely has the power to trigger IRL trauma. I, however, do not give them the pass to make a shitty "liking this in fiction = liking this is reality" reblog.

If you are talking about the sexualisation of FICTIONAL children, you are talking about kodacons, NOT pedos. I don't care if they have overlap. I don't care if you hate both groups. They are different. If you don't want kodacons interacting with you, fucking SAY THAT. Don't hide under "pedos DNI" you fucking coward. If nothing else, do that so that I can know to avoid your landmine of a blog.

Alright rant over y'all can chill now.

[neuship-zone]

can’t decide if this is the best or worst description I’ve ever seen for this series 😭😭

[neuship-zone]

Kuroshitsuji S5 | Ep12 | “You’re as flashy as ever.” But of course! I’m the only lady in the English branch’s Collections Department, after all!

[neuship-zone]

souls entwined

[neuship-zone]

Often the humble kind, but he can't deny he was born to blow your mind

guys please look at my wife he's so pretty

[neuship-zone]

[neuship-zone]

the fact that this matches their faces exactly

[neuship-zone]

Goo,d morning my nincompoops . Reuploading some of my art from instagram onto here

These are all $10 doodle commissions :P

[neuship-zone]

hehe

[neuship-zone]

IT FUCKIN YURI DAAAAAAAAAAAY

[neuship-zone]

It's not about you being on a public platform, it's about you being on a public platform saying word for word the exact same thing you said before

However I am not willing to argue with you any more than I did on YT so bye

really nice of wilbur to post one more video to his main channel so everyone who forgot to unsubscribe can finally drop his ass for good

[neuship-zone]

i think “video games aren’t really the violent child-corrupting threat some parents worry they are” and “certain circles of gamer culture are incredibly toxic and can lead people down dangerous/hateful ideological rabbit holes” are ideas that can absolutely coexist

[neuship-zone]

yall clearly dont understand the power of narc gabe

before i decided he had any other disorders i looked at him and went "yeah hes a narcissist"

hes 100% overt and communal. he makes sure ppl know hes better than them, but hes still willing to assist. assisting ppl fuels his ego. him being so nice is what makes him even more superior. hes heavens most powerful angel and also known for being so so kind. he interacts with lower ranks bc hes so very nice. hes so kind. he saved the ferryman bc he likes them, right? them idolizing him and praising him definitely didnt influence that. he definitely doesnt create an attachment to the ferryman bc they put him on a pedestal. not at all.

do yall see what i mean???

- manic anon

-

[neuship-zone]

See, this is a valid concept. Except, in my experience, people who believe in it use it as an excuse to uplift people who do bad things and have no plans of changing. Which completely defeats the point.

Yes, there is not really such a thing as a truly "good" person or a truly "bad" person, but someone who makes mistakes and actively tries to change is not the same as someone who does the same thing over and over again and never tries to admit their guilt (or worse, are actively proud of themselves for such things). Or someone who does a bad thing and then sweeps it under the rug and gives vague answers instead of just owning up.

There's also nuance to this, as someone's pointed out in the reblogs somewhere. If I have a friend that is friends with and constantly hanging around racists, fascists and TERFs, that isn't my fucking friend. Sure, all of those people have the capacity to change, and just because my friend is hanging out with them doesn't necessarily mean they share those views, but the real question is why do they continue to hang out with people who would want (or would have wanted) me dead??? It wouldn't be abuse to say "Hey, actually you need to stop surrounding yourself with bigots or we can't be friends anymore." That could just be me missing the point though, since that would probably be classified under "friendships that are personally hurting me".

I’m really tired of seeing people broken up into labels of absolutes.

People are not just “good” or “bad”.

People are not a list of labels. 

People are complex, situations are complex.

I know, that makes it a lot harder when you want to just write off everything someone’s ever done as bad – but that’s not how people actually are, and it would do everyone good to stop pretending they are.

I am tired of hearing about the fear people have in putting themselves out there. And it is a scary thing! Putting yourself out there means subjecting yourself to people who want a really good reason to tear you down, who will jump at the first chance to feel “good” by labeling someone else as “bad”.

I reject this. I reject the idea that there should be fear in speaking up and talking about experiences and trying to reach an understanding of a situation.

I’m unhappy to see people spitefully urging others to cut off ties with their friends under the guise of “well, that person’s just inherently bad, so if you talk to them you’re bad too.” That is fucked up. You definitely have the right to let the friend know you don’t want to hear about whoever troubles you, but you do not at all have the right to decide who their friends should be. This includes guilt trips.

Anyway, just try to be more aware of others. Everyone else is a person like you. They might not have the same experiences as you. They might not understand how their words are harmful, or how what they’re doing is wrong. They certainly won’t if you never tell them.

Most people are trying to be good, but they’re going to mess it up sometimes. Try to keep that in mind. Even when people do really fucked up shit, sometimes they are trying to do good. “The road to hell is paved with good intentions” and all that.

Nothing gets solved, no growth happens when you put people into a box from which you’ll never let them escape.

Yes, you absolutely must be careful about people who have tendencies and patterns that are harmful to you. Sometimes people try to overcome those patterns and they fail, and you have to distance yourself from them: that is the sad reality of life. Sometimes though, they can overcome it. But they certainly won’t if the first thing you do is write them off after a fuck up. 

Be sincere. Use your best judgment.

[neuship-zone]

OH MY GOD IT'S YOU. WHY ARE YOU EVERYWHERE?

Well you did say you were on Tumblr so I shouldn't be surprised

really nice of wilbur to post one more video to his main channel so everyone who forgot to unsubscribe can finally drop his ass for good

[neuship-zone]

This is going to be the only post I make on this because this controversy is not beneficial for my moral OCD but just so that people are aware:

I am Wilbur Soot critical. I am generally apathetic to the whole drama, but Wilbur Soot supporters have done nothing but piss me off this entire time with their aggressive bootlicking and yet claim that Shelby supporters are the bad ones. Not that there isn't harassment at all from the Shelby supporters but it certainly isn't as vocal as them.

I'm not going to make any further statements of what I think about Wilbur because it's not my fucking place to make a judgement on someone I don't even know and whose actions I am not the victim of. However, I don't need to know him very well to know that his latest response (and honestly all of them up to this point) is extremely shitty and serves no purpose other than monetisation.

I guess I stand with Shelby? I'm not committed to supporting her, but I am absolutely not in support of Wilbur, and I wouldn't say I'm neutral either.

Feel free to make whatever judgement you want from this and discuss anything you're confused about, but do not try and guilt trip me into caring about this anymore than I do now. It's not happening.