niets-is-onbeduidend - Tumblr blog

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

William B. “Bill” Watterson II.

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

Head Shaker (2019)

happy halloween! (insp)

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

© kokirapsd

※re-posted with permission ※please don’t remove the source

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

EMMA. (2020), dir Autumn de Wilde

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

Bothersome beast, comforting friend

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

ADAM DRIVER in ANNETTE (2021) with MARION COTILLARD   part 3 | requested by @lumberjack00fantasies .  

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

they have, like, no bad angle. and that was a lot of angles

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

1914 Untitled painting of a woman in a chair by Carl Larsson. From Mikki's 1900-1919 History Resource, FB.

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

our followers’ top 10 classic disney films

8. robin hood (1973) dir. wolfgang reitherman

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

The Wizard of Oz (1939) dir. Victor Fleming

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

The Importance of Studying Queerness in Context.

when studying queer history, one always has to keep in mind two seemingly contradictory things: firstly, that queerness and queer people have always existed, but at the same time, that queerness and queer identities have not always existed the way they exist today.

Modern queer terms and identities did not exist to queer people in the past. They would not have thought of themselves as "gay" or "trans" or even "queer." While these modern terms may seem to fit certain historic individuals, these individuals would not have thought of themselves as such, and it would not be a part of their lived experience. To apply the modern identities of queerness to history is to erase the lives and experiences of queer people in history, and care must always be taken to understand queer history within the context of its time.

When looking at queer history online, there is a *lot* of misinformation and misidentification out there simply because people are eager to apply modern queerness to history, often in places where it doesn't belong.

A lot of old photos get misidentified as gay because they show two people of the same sex showing some level of physical affection towards each other. Okay, I'll admit that the open-mouth kissing photobooth pictures are probably actually gay, but an old picture of two men or two women holding hands or with their arms around each other, or even kissing on the cheek, were common shows of platonic affection.

I hate to break everyone's gay little hearts, but without explicit documentation saying so, assuming that these couples are all gay is putting modern queer identity in places where it simply didn't exist. The women in the final picture are sisters. The "not married" boys are bachelors interested in marrying women.

In the silent film Wings, the emotional climax of the film comes in the form of a kiss exchanged between the characters played by Jack Powell and David Armstrong. It often gets attributed as the first gay kiss in cinema history. In fact it is almost always called the first gay kiss in cinema history, even on the fucking YouTube clip I found:

Except it isn't gay. The two men spend the whole film fighting over who gets to be Clara Bow's boyfriend. When Richard Arlen's character is fatally wounded, his dear friend rushes to his side and kisses him goodbye, because in the 1920s, that was considered the ultimate show of friendship. The movie ends with Jack Powell falling in love with Clara Bow.

Similarly, a kiss shared between Lillian and Dorothy Gish in the 1921 movie Orphans of the Storm often gets attributed as being queer, but it wasn't.

They were sisters playing sisters. None of this was considered unusual.

Pooh-poohing on all of these images that so many people on the internet breathlessly and joyously laud as proud gay history isn't fun. It makes me feel like I'm fucking Ben Shapiro. But if misinformation is allowed to flourish, it allows people like Ben Shapiro to come in and make the argument that queerness is a modern invention and queer people didn't exist in the past.

Everyone loves to see queerness represented in history, but the fact is that none of the stuff in this post would have been seen as explicitly gay and thus shouldn't be called gay today. If we are to understand queer history in its fullness and richness, it is absolutely crucial that we get it right. We owe it to our queer ancestors to recognize, honor, and not embellish the actual lives they lived.

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

— "It was against school rules." — "About your curly hair?" — 怪物: Monster (2023). Directed by Hirokazu Kore-eda Written by Yuji Sakamoto

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

NCUTI GATWA as KEN | Barbie (2023)

@lgbtqcreators creator bingo | free choice

[niets-is-onbeduidend]

[niets-is-onbeduidend]