princess1937

[princess1937]

The “tolerant” left doing its favorite thing, limiting free speech, and censuring some truly amazing books. I too had to read To Kill A Mockingbird my freshman year of high school and it impacted me emotionally. My 14 year old self cried for hours because of what happened to Tom Robinson, how he was found guilty, just because he is black, even though the facts prove he was innocent, how he was subsequently killed because he tried to escape prison.

This is a textbook case of socialism. This is the beginning of EVERY dystopian story, like OP said “You start banning books then where does it stop??  People will be burning them next.” #Fahrenheit451 (this has literally been written about in a book many of you probably had to read in high school. If not, I encourage you to read it and compare the world of Guy Montag to the United States today. It is a scary comparison.)

They ban those books for being historically accurate, but they also ban The Song Of The South (A Disney movie released in 1946 about life on a southern plantation for a slave) because it doesn’t paint an accurate portrayal of slavery therefore it is racist. You CAN’T have both! You can’t say, its wrong to make out slavery as a happy go lucky thing because it is racist and you need to show slavery for what it was and how horribly black people were treated, and then turn right around and say you can’t show how horribly black people were treated because thats racist. I’m a history major, I LIVE for historical accuracy. This is just as bad as those textbooks that are take out slavery in American History textbooks. IT HAPPENED! It was horrible, inhumane, and a disgusting part of United States history, but. it. happened. and it was a cause of one of the bloodiest wars the United States has been involved in. You take that out you take out a very important part of history, when you ban those books you take out not only United States history, you take out American culture. 

People love The Hunger Games Trilogy (Suzanne Collins), The Divergent Trilogy (Veronica Roth), 1984 (George Orwell), Brave New World (Aldous Huxley), The Giver (Lois Lowry), and Anthem (Ayn Rand), but the same people somehow don’t realize that the protagonist in each of those stories is fighting against everything that the left and the far left promotes.

Each of these stories has an unjust, overreaching, big government and a group on “rebells” who are tired of that shit so they overthrow the government and defeat the evil big government dictators and fascists.

It truly amazes me that this goes unnoticed. Lets talk about the fifth highest grossing movie series about an insurgent group attaching an unjust, overreaching, big government who was actively taking away rights and oppressing its subjects. 

Thats right

5) Star Wars $4,486,158,822

And it goes unnoticed by the left that these stories are anti-left. They are anti establishment, they are anti big government. They are pro democracy, they are pro republicanism (the system of government what the United States is). But, those big governments, the real life ones, do. They see that, and they feel threatened because they have the same policies as the government from Anthem, from Fahrenheit 451, from The Hunger Games Trilogy. Two years ago Mockingjay was banned in foreign countries because of pro revolution rhetoric. I HATE seeing people at my university wearing “socialist student society” or “communism will win” shirts or what ever, because those same people, those SAME people are advocating censorship, a repeal of ALL your human rights, and advocating oppression, and it makes me feel HORRIBLE. None of them would last a week in Fidel’s Cuba, Mao’s China, Stalin’s Russia, or Hitler’s Germany. And the same goes for so called “democratic socialists” because socialism and “democratic socialism” are one and the same except for a few nitty gritty things. And it is because of people like them that you have this culture where people think that they need to censure out books with amazing historical insight, and books/movies that invoke an emotional rage and hatred against big government and oppression.

Huckleberry Finn and To Kill A Mockingbird BANNED In Virginia School System Due To N-WORD (REACTION)   

I read To Kill A Mockingbird in High School.  That book is so damn important.  I’m mad as hell that any school would try to ban it.

We can’t ban books.  You start banning books then where does it stop??  People will be burning them next.

[princess1937]

Add it to the book. (It’s actually a good book, if you can stomach it. Some of the deaths are very sad, some are sad and gruesome, some are really gruesome.)

Oh Jesus

[princess1937]

Absolutely, I’m taking my time combing over your sources, learning very interesting things that have been brought to light, and looking at other sources that support my stance. At this current time I have many other papers and projects and because this is a side project I have had to prioritize. I have a very vague outline saved, however I am not sure when I will be able to post. It will probably be sometime next week. But thank you for maintaining this debate. I will tag you in the post once it is finished. Until then, thank you for your patience, and I hope you have a good day.

@princess1937 Does the debate about the nature of the United States continue?

[princess1937]

I don’t care who santa thinks he is.  if he flies over u.s. air space without a documented flight plan and sufficient clearance he WILL BE SHOT DOWN.

[princess1937]

Man at least you've had dates. I'm 20 and I've never been on a date. #someonetakeonefortheteam #i’mactuallygirlfriendandwifematerial 

Why do you hate dating?

Because I’m 20 years old and I’m significantly more mature than most people my age (and most people 5-7 years older than me) and my main interest in life is politics.

It’s hard for me to either a) find somebody near my age who is mature and who likes politics, or b) find somebody who is older but willing to date a younger girl and also likes politics.

I am legitimately ready to settle down, and I have already started my career. Most people my age and older are not and have not. I’m an abnormality.

[princess1937]

My favorite constitution video. Watch it. Learn.

[princess1937]

Literally me.

IT'S NOT CHRISTMAS YET REEEEE

who tf says bitch

[princess1937]

It is a sad sad day when someone who does not even live in the United States understands American politics more than Americans. 

People seem to whine a lot about the electoral college mostly because their candidate didn’t win and you know when someone loses you need to blame someone or something else not the fact that they are morons.

As European I didn’t understand what electoral college is (even if the EU parliament works on sort of similar principle). Took me few days and acual elections to understand but here is the thing: 

The US is made of bunch of states many of them with different culture, not dramatically different, but there IS difference. Cali and Texas for example are massive states. IF the US president was elected by popular vote, you don’t need much of the other states to have a winner. You just make sure you appeal to the people of California and Texas, maybe bunch of smaller states to make the numbers and you can ignore the other 40 for example. 

You can hate Trump all you want. You can say he is racist or whatever, I am  not arguing over that. But the only reason Hillary won the popular vote is because she won in few big states who have population larger than others. If you are all about fairness and right, tell me is it fair for 3 or 4 states to decide to governance of the other 47? Look at the map. You have about 20 states that voted Clinton, one of them (MN) pretty close to a Trump win. 20 states are NOT half of the US, they are less than a half. She has more votes because she won big population hubs like CA, MA, IL and whatever else I’m missing.

You can hate the electoral college all you want because your candidate lost but try to be honest for 1 second and admit it: IF Clinton had won, but Trump would have won the popular vote, none of you would have cared and you would say: Yes it’s good we have the electoral college. 

[princess1937]

Allow me, a history major, to enter this debate. 

Washington wanted to abolish slavery because he saw slavery as wrong 

Daniel Rundle, supported the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776, was vice president of the Supreme Executive Council, 1777–79, judge of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court from 1780 until his death, and author of the state act for the gradual abolition of slavery. Which would effectively give the freemen some rights. (those are two separate citations)

“ If negroes were objects of capture in War, the Captor might proclaim their liberty when in his possession. If once declared free, could the grant be recalled? Could the British Government stipulate the surrender of men made free to slavery? Is it natural to put such a construction upon general words if they will bear another? Is not this as it regards the rights of humanity an odious sense?”-Alexander Hamilton

“It is possible indeed that the enthusiasm which the transition from Slavery to Liberty may inspire, may be a substitute for the energy of a good administration, and the spring of great exertions. But the ebullitions of enthusiasm must ever be a precarious reliance. And it is quite as possible that the greatness, and perhaps immaturity, of that transition may prolong licentiousness and disorder.”- Alexander Hamilton. Meaning that the people have the right intensions, and the right motivation, but if they do it too quickly the momentum to abolish slavery will be gone and could ultimately cause unintended consequences later.

By the power of the constitution if you are a free person then you are granted every inalienable right of life, liberty and property, property includes yourself, and happiness. Do you really think that the founding fathers would have put that down if they did not think that this country would just be a country of white people? They were very careful, and very precise on the words and wordings they chose. They knew times were going to change, and during the very late eighteenth century slavery was on the decline. It was not until Eli Witney created the cotton gin that an increase of slavery, and an increase of the ability to own slaves was a major issue. Now, according to “United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez in 1990, the Court said that “the people” refers to those “persons who are part of a national community,” or who have “substantial connections” to the United States.″ Now, to me that means that slaves or other people, as long as they had a tie to the community of the United States means that they are included in all rights mentioned in the constitution. The Massachusetts Constitution dealt with this issue a few times in regard to their first article which says “Article I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.” Slaves in Massachusetts argued that according to the Declaration of Independence all men were created equal and because of the first article of their state constitution they were entitled to the equal rights as everyone else. The court found in favor of them thusly making the practice of slavery illegal, granted the former slaves compensation, tried their former masters for any criminal activity that came to light during the trials, some were found guilty and forced to pay heavy fines, and made the former slaves free US citizens. So I ask you, what evidence is there that would make you assume that the founding fathers wanted an all white country because I would honesty like to know so I can either A) Learn or B) Be able to refute. 

Now, about your jab at conservatives and republicans. Before I begin, yes, anti slavery does not necessarily equal equal rights but let us look at which ideology owned the most slaves, which ideology voted against equal rights the most, and hurt plenty of people in the US. These people were mostly Democratic-Republicans who transitioned to be what we call today the Democratic Party. “Don’t be stupid the ideologies of the parties changed.” Except they didn’t. Here is a great post about how that actually did not happen, please click here. And also, look at who is universally known to be the first Democrat President of the United States. 

Yeah thats right. Andrew Jackson. You know, the one who signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 causing hundreds of thousands of Native Americans to be forcibly removed from their lands onto tiny reservations. And how “Slavery was the source of Andrew Jackson’s wealth.” But that is beside the point. The point is if we look at some very important equal rights amendments you will see that Republicans were in majority favor and Democratic were in a very minority favor if they voted for it at all.

Oh and let us not forget who supported the 19th amendment which prohibited any state from denying the right to vote based on sex. 

Please compare the maps and you will see that it was predominantly Republicans that supported the right for everyone to vote regardless of sex. Oh and guess what? When the 19th amendment was ratified in August, three months before the election of a republican President, democratic President Woodrow Wilson who “many historians say that President Wilson’s support for women’s suffrage was lukewarm at best” was President of the United States.

Again, I am going to iterate how the ideologies of the parties have not changes. And because I am almost 100% certain you will not click the link I will post it word for word here. This post is by @another-conservative

“Woodrow Wilson, democrat president, supported the KKK and helped revive it by popularizing KKK revisionist film Birth of a Nation.

Blacks began voting blue in 1936 in the proposal of the New Deal, not because they aligned with democrat party values but for political expediency.

“I’ll have them niggers voting democrat for the next 200 years.” - Lyndon B. Johnson, democrat president.

Democrats continuously filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and it was passed in spite of democrats, not by democrats.

Democrats voted 61% and Republicans 24% against the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which passed 333-85. The Senate passed with the support of 94 percent of the Republican caucus and 73 percent of the Democratic caucus.

From the National Review: The Democrats have been sedulously rewriting history for decades. Their preferred version pretends that all the Democratic racists and segregationists left their party and became Republicans starting in the 1960s. How convenient. If it were true that the South began to turn Republican due to Lyndon Johnson’s passage of the Civil Rights Act, you would expect that the Deep South, the states most associated with racism, would have been the first to move. That’s not what happened. The first southern states to trend Republican were on the periphery: North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. (George Wallace lost these voters in his 1968 bid.) The voters who first migrated to the Republican party were suburban, prosperous New South types. The more Republican the South has become, the less racist.

From Liberty Voice: All but the redoubtable Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, the Southern Democrat who managed to stay Democrat for well over 40 years; despite all the mythical ship-jumping which is supposed to have occurred. All of the modern liberal Democrats who adored him, like Bill Clinton, Barrack Obama and Al Gore, must not have been told Byrd was a Grand Klegal in the KKK before he ran for the Senate as a Democrat. Byrd was a celebrated member of the Democrat party up til his death, in 2010. So it is not as if the discussion of his affiliations is somehow ancient history.

And further...

The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had no illusions as to of which party and political ideology he was marching against, and he voted Republican. In honor of Reverend King’s legacy, perhaps it is best to judge the Democrat party on the content of its character.”

By saying conservatives wanted a white only country, you completely discount the vast majority of the founding fathers who were opposed to slavery, the founding fathers who made sure that there were no words in the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, or The Bill Of Rights that would limit the freedoms an American citizen has, the conservatives who voted for the equality of all Americans regardless of race and sex. 

And America is a great place because of it.

Still waiting for a conservative to disprove my assertion that the American Founders wanted a white country. 

[princess1937]

[princess1937]

WATCH THIS VIDEO AND EDUCATE YOURSELF!

And a little history fact from a history major free of charge. HITLER WAS A SOCIALIST! IT SAYS IT RIGHT THERE IN THE NAZI NAME!

I am so excited that the honor of being our first woman president will be going to someone other than Hillary Clinton.

[princess1937]

You mean that THE James Madison, Father of the Constitution, believed that charity should be up to the individual and not the government!? *GASP*

James Madison was pretty clear on this.

“The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.”

-Speech, House of Representatives, during the debate “On the Memorial of the Relief Committee of Baltimore, for the Relief of St. Domingo Refugees” (1794).

#constitution #liberty #government #10thAmendment #jamesmadison #madison #founders #foundingfathers #generalwelfare #federalgovernment #quote #quotes #qotd #freedom

[princess1937]

HIDDEN CAM: #GayWeddingCakes at Muslim Bakeries? StevenCrowder

As you can see, in all of these clips it shows that each place of service refused to serve the “customer” because he wanted a cake that promoted gay marriage. these shop owners should be held at the same level as the Christian shop owners.

The Christian owners of a Northern Ireland bakery have lost their appeal against a ruling that their refusal to make a “gay cake” was discriminatory.

Appeal court judges said that, under law, the bakers were not allowed to provide a service only to people who agreed with their religious beliefs.

Two years ago, the family-run firm refused to make a cake saying: “Support Gay Marriage”.

It had been ordered by gay rights activist Gareth Lee.

The firm argued that the cake’s message was against the bakers’ religious views.

In court on Monday, the judges said that it did not follow that icing a message meant you supported that message.

The appeal court upheld the original court’s decision that Ashers in County Antrim discriminated against Mr Lee.

At that time, District Judge Isobel Brownlie said she accepted that Ashers had “genuine and deeply held” religious views, but said the business was not above the law.

The family’s appeal was heard in May, but the judgement was reserved.

Good! Businesses should always be secular.

Make sure to click the first link in the text above to read the full summary of judgement.

[princess1937]

I will forever fight for the right to protest the government. I will forever defend that right for everyone despite their beliefs. But I WILL NOT defend riots and people who are literally protesting against democracy. I WILL NOT defend you when you are setting flags on fire because people have died fighting for that flag and what that flag stands for, meaning literally every single right that we as Americans have, when there are dozens of other countries that do not have those because our rights are privileges to them. You are literally saying, “I don’t care that if the founding fathers lost during the Revolutionary War they would have been executed for treason, I don’t care that there are soldiers dying this very minute so I can have the right to protest and vote.” I WILL NOT defend your violence because violence puts everyone in danger. For fucks sake be thankful you have the right to protest because guess what, if we were in almost any other country, you would either be arrested and executed for treason, or you would be arrested and tried for treason. Wether you are a man or a woman be thankful that we live in a nation that lets you have a say because there are so many that do not. 

[princess1937]

"You're not privileged because you're white. You're privileged because you live IN AMERICA" 

 SAY👏IT👏LOUDER👏SO👏THE👏PEOPLE👏IN👏THE👏BACK👏CAN👏HEAR👏YOU

For the first time in my life I am TERRIFIED to be gay.

[princess1937]

I’m about to make many people so VERY VERY mad

Look I don't like Trump, I've not liked Trump from the get go. I think he's slimy, I think he's a pig, and I think congress and his new cabinet need to keep him on a short leash, and it is up to the American people to hold him accountable for everything he does. But wether you "won" or wether you "lost" SHOW SOME CLASS! Oh my lord, I'm sick of reading the "We won, Hillary sucks" "We lost, the country is doomed" posts. My father has a very good quote about situations like these "Act like you've done it before." Meaning don't celebrate a victory because you look obnoxious and boastful and like a class A douche, and don't be a worry wort sore loser because you just look like a wimp. I honestly do not like Trump, but I really do not like Hillary for reasons that are useless to get into, but she bowed out of the election gracefully, something I can honestly say was probably hard, and something I can commend her on. I'm sick and tired of this. I'm sick and tired of the "I can't believe we let a racist, sexist blah blah blah become president" posts. He is NONE of those things, do I think he is incredibly rude, and says very crude and dirty things that people don't like to hear? Yes, I absolutely believe that. BUT NOBODY WITH A BRAIN WOULD ACTUALLY THINK A DIFFERENT RACE OR A DIFFERENT SEX IS LESS SUPERIOR THAN ANOTHER, NOBODY WITH A BRAIN ACTUALLY BELIEVES ANY ONE RACE IS BETTER THAN ANOTHER AND THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF RACISM AND SEXISM, NOT MEAN THINGS THAT ARE SAID! And don't tell me that I'm a privileged white American BECAUSE I KNOW THAT! I am unbelievably grateful for the opportunities I've had BECAUSE MY PARENTS WORKED THEIR ASSES OFF WHEN THEY WERE YOUNGER SO I WOULDN'T HAVE TO GROW UP THE WAY THEY DID, VERY POOR AND STRUGGLING TO MAKE ENDS MEET! MY DAD LIVED IN A CLEARED OUT SCHOOL BUS FOR A TIME FOR HAVEN'S SAKE, AND MY MOM'S FATHER HAD TO WORK TWO JOBS JUST TO BUY HER A PAIR OF NEW SHOES THAT SHE WANTED BECAUSE HER'S WERE FALLING APART! THEY HAD TO PAY FOR DINNER WITH CHANGE THEY FOUND IN THEIR CAR SOMETIMES! WHEN MY FATHER WAS IN COLLEGE HE WORKED 70 HOUR WEEKS IN THE SUMMER AND STILL GRADUATED IN THREE YEARS JOINED THE MARINE CORP AS A RECON MARINE AND WENT TO GRAD SCHOOL AND GOT HIS MBA IN ONE YEAR. DO NOT TELL ME MY FAMILY DOES NOT KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO WORK HARD, THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO STRUGGLE. I AM MORE THAN BLESSED TO LIVE THE PRIVILEGED LIFE I DO. I DO NOT DESERVE TO LIVE THE LIFE I DO BECAUSE 9/10 TIMES I TAKE IT FOR GRANTED. I TAKE IT FOR GRANTED THAT I AM GETTING A  COLLEGE EDUCATION FROM A GREAT UNIVERSITY, I TAKE IT FOR GRANTED THAT I DRIVE MY OWN CAR, I TAKE IT FOR GRANTED THAT MY FAMILY LOVES ME WHEN HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER FAMILIES DO NOT LOVE THEIR CHILDREN OR SIBLINGS OR PARENTS AND THAT IS FAR MORE UNFAIR THAN A WOMAN NOT BECOMING PRESIDENT. The whole irony of this situation is that people say the conservative right does not have diversity, but if you actually looked at the original republican debates there was more diversity on the stage than in the democratic debates, both racially, intellectually, and career wise. All the democratic candidates agreed with each other, but the GOP all disagreed varyingly on every subject. There were only old white people at the democratic debates, but at the GOP there were White people, Black people and Hispanic people. All the candidates at the Democratic debates were career politicians, but there were doctors and entrepreneurs and ceos at the GOP debates. There were women in both, so instead of voting with your vigina how about you actually listen to what they were saying because Carly Fiorina would have actually supported you. "But she would never have won because the Republican Party is full of sexist pigs." Ok first of all shut up, that's bigoted. Are you saying that, I, a 20 year old female working on a liberal arts degree, am sexist because I vote conservatively, because I believe in conservative social values and ultra conservative economics? Here is a HISTORY LESSON BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY YOU NEED ONE FROM A HISTORY MAJOR. Do you know what the first state to ratify a woman's unrestricted right to vote was? Wyoming in 1869, 51 years before the 19th amendment was ratified. You know, the one that granted women the right to vote. Do you know which state had the first female elected to any firm of office? Wyoming. Do you know the name of the FIRST woman to hold office not locally but nationally, as in congress? Jeannette Rankin from Montana in 1916, four years before the ratification of the 19th amendment. Do you know what they all have in common?  They are all conservative! They are all REPUBLICANS. For the love of God, please stop acting like all Republicans or Conservatives are evil, racist, and sexist. "Only racists and sexists voted" that is not even possible. Trump won with over 270 electoral points, and Barack Obama won with 330 electoral points. Meaning 60+ electoral votes had to be switched. Those people were the people that felt screwed by the administration. They felt screwed because of the unnecessary taxation and horrible healthcare "reforms" like people's 25% increase in premiums, and 40% increase for other people. Why the FUCK do people want to punish the richest people when they are the ones who worked hard to get where they are, and SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT "BUT THE WERE BORN INTO IT" MOST OF THAT WEALTH THAT YOU HATE AND WANT TO TAKE WILL ACTUALLY BE GONE WITHIN ONE GENERATION. The irony of the fact is that this "reform" hurts the very people it was designed to help. And now I see that there are college students protesting in the cities. They have every right to protest as protected in our bill of rights and constitution in the first amendment. But, those that are protesting are protesting the system. They are protesting our republic with democratically elected officials and representatives. THAT IS WHAT PISSES ME OFF! For shits sake be thankful you got to vote. Be thankful you got to vote, wether you are a man or a woman because there are dozens and hundreds and thousands and hundreds of thousands of other citizens in dozens of other countries that would kill to be able to elect their leaders. So many middle eastern countries where women can't vote because they are considered less than dirt. Where women have to have their virginity checked to be enrolled in college. You want to talk about sexism, fine let's talk about the actual racist and sexist establishment of the religion known as Islam where men are actually encouraged to beat their women when they speak out of turn, where Muhammad had a 6 year old child bride when he was well into his forties, where the mass genocide of literally every person not a Muslim is supported. "But Islam is a religion of peace" except it's not. Did you know that the Quran actually gets more violent the farther you get into it? Did you know that in Islam you are supposed to exercise the most recent words of Muhammad and hold that to be the truth and if that contradicts a previous statement said earlier in Muhammad's life you are supposed to disregard the earlier statement? Did you know that Muhammad's last words were to kill all the Jews and Christian's? But if you are a Muslim woman you probably didn't because you're not supposed to be reading. What about the poor women who are raped because their religious doctrine condones the rape of women, and when they come forward they can get thrown in jail. You want to talk about rape culture, and get all worked up about rape culture and the male gaze, well you should be furious at the establishment that is Islam and the Middle East as a whole. Why? Because there actually is rape culture there and not here in the USA or Canada where we as a society we frown upon rapists, where we actually send them to court, where they lose their job for making rape jokes or being convicted, where they actually go to prison when they are found guilty, another thing, what the hell happened to innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? Huh? How the hell do we get past this "he's/ she's a rapist! Throw him/her in jail" before a trial has even started? I'll tell you, you sit back keep your damn mouth shut and watch because if he or she is truly guilty they will be locked up and EVERYBODY will hate them. That doesn't happen in the Middle East. A woman needs witnesses for a rape to "actually" have been committed. THAT is so wrong. So get mad about that, not about this stupid fucking slut walk, slut shame, bullshit BECAUSE NOBODY FUCKING THINKS IT'S A VICTOM'S FAULT IF THEY WERE RAPED OR SEXUALLY ASSAULTED! Holy shit do I need to spell it out for you? Another thing, that ratio of 1 out of every 5 women will be sexually abused is wrong. It's 1 out of 23. Because by that first ratio that is 20% of the nation. And that make the US more dangerous than places in Africa where that ratio is correct. That also means, statistically, either me, my mom or my three younger sisters will be sexually abused. So you chose, who is getting their life changed forever? YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY PEOPLE LITERALLY HATE THE SLUT WALK SJW BULLSHIT? BECAUSE YOU LOOK RIDICULOUS AND I DON'T WANT MY 10 year old sister or my 7 year old sister to see your unshaven, fat, flabby naked ass walking down the damn street. I don't want my 14 year old brother to see that either. I don't want to see a naked man walking down the street either. Join a fucking nudist colony if that's what you want. "YOU'RE FAT SHAMING" oh my God. No I'm not. And fucking fat shaming is not a thing, also, I'm fucking fat ok! I'm actually trying to lose weight because BEING FAT IS NOT THE NATURAL STATE OF THE HUMAN BODY AND I AM DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO ALL THE HEALTH PROBLEMS BEING FAT ENTAILS. IT IS BASIC BIOLOGY FOR GOD SAKE. EVERYONE CAN LOSE WEIGHT SO DON'T EVEN GET ME STARTED ON THAT BULLSHIT. YOU WANT PROOF, LOOK AT JILLIAN MICHAELS, LOOK AT PEOPLE WHO HAVE UNDERGONE WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY, OR HAVE BEEN ON LOW CARB DIETS. YOU WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT? STOP EATING CARBS! STOP EATING MCDONALD'S AND CHIPOTLE AND CHICK FIL A AND BURGER KING AND WENDY'S AND PIZZA. EAT A SANDWICH, EAT A SALAD FOR GOD SAKE. YOU ACTUALLY SHOULD NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE IN YOUR SKIN WHEN YOU'RE 5'4" AND WEIGH 300 FUCKING POUNDS, YOU'RE LITERALLY ASKING FOR DEATH. "WELL HEALTHY FOOD IS EXPENSIVE, AND SO ARE GYM MEMBERSHIPS, AND I WOULD EAT BETTER AND EXERCISE IF WOMEN WERE PAID EQUALLY TO MEN, WHAT ABOUT THE WAGE GAP?" What about it? There's no such thing. That is a statistic that is poorly cited. Do you know what they did to figure that women make $.77 for every dollar a man makes? They asked everybody what they made without asking how many hours they worked, what they got a degree in, where they got a degree, if they even got a degree, without asking is that job more suited for a man or a woman. If that were a real thing all business owners would fire their men because they could save $.33 for every woman they hired. FUCKING BASIC ECONOMICS, AND I KNOW MOST OF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND ECONOMICS BECAUSE YOU ALL THINK MINIMUM WAGE SHOULD BE RAISED TO FIFTEEN FUCKING DOLLARS, AND HEALTH CARE SHOULD BE FREE, AND COLLEGE SHIULD BE FREE REGARDLESS OF THE ECONOMIC FIASCO THAT WOULD ENSUE. If someone has a Biology degree from Harvard University, and another has a Biology degree from Nowhere University, who deserves the job, who deserves the promotion, who deserves to be paid more? You want to be paid more? GET A FUCKING REAL ASS DEGREE. WOMEN IN SCIENCE ARE GREAT, WOMEN AS POLITICIANS ARE GREAT, WOMEN IN ENGINEERING ARE GREAT, WOMEN AS TEACHERS ARE GREAT, WOMEN IN BUSINESS ARE GREAT ETC. GET A REAL FUCKING RELEVANT DEGREE HOLH SHIT. THE ONLY PERSON YOU HOLD BACK WHEN YOU GET A DEGREE LIKE MINE OR A STUPID WOMEN AND GENDER STUDIES DEGREE IS YOURSELF. SO DON'T COMPLAIN ABOUT MAKING LESS THAN MEN WHEN YOU GET DUMB AS SHIT DEGREES LIKE THAT. Also the fucking school system. THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR WOMEN. Boys literally have an abundance of energy and need to run because of short attention spans while girls can sit down for hours and learn. WOMEN ARE ALSO THE PRIMARY ATTENDEES OF COLLEGES. THERE ARE MORE WOMEN IN COLLEGE NOW THAN MEN. Dress codes are there for a reason as well. I don't want to see half your ass hanging out of a pair of shorts with two inches of fabric. I don't want to see your boobs falling out of your shirt either. Wear decent length shorts if you're going to wear shorts, and shirts where I don't have to worry if your fucking tit is going to say hello to me. I don't need to see your boobs, I've got 2, I know what they look like. And MEN, pull your damn pants up, wear respectable shirts, keep any facial hair groomed and don't get a man bun, you look like a fucking chicken head when you have man buns, and don't stare at women. It is THAT FUCKING SIMPLE. "Wow you're being really insensitive" to fucking who? The world isn't trigger warning safe spaces, and I honestly hope you come to your senses because if you don't, when you finally graduate after 6 years of getting that Women and Gender Studies degree the world is just going to eat you up, and I honestly feel a little pity, but only a little because you brought this on yourself. So go ahead and be mad that the majority of the country was fed up with leftist bullshit and lies, like being "tolerant" to other people's views because I sure as fuck have been tolerant to my many liberal peers and friends, but I've been scared for my academic career if I outed myself as conservative to my peers or my professors, and if that doesn't speak numbers I don't know what does. The only people I have ever seen be completely intolerant, rude, bigoted, and downright dangerous are the people who describe themselves as being a "tolerant" liberal. So to everyone who is #notmypresident and protesting the system that our founding fathers could have DIED for if we lost the war, YOU are a disgrace to America and no better than the FASCISTS, WHICH IS A FUCKING LEFT WING POLITICAL SYSTEM IF YOU ACTUALLY STUDY IT, LIKE HITLER AND STALIN, WHO WERE ALSO SOCIALISTS BY THE WAY INCASE YOU FORGOT, YES FUCKING HITLER WAS A SOCIALIST IT SAYS IT IN THE FUCKING NAZI NAME, WHO STRIPPED THEIR OWN CITIZENS OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE, THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS (WHICH, YES, INCLUDES ALL GUNS BECAUSE THERE WERE FUCKING FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS IN 1776 AND GUESS FUCKING WHAT, THE FOUNDING FATHERS WERE FANBOYS OF THEM), THE RIGHT TO PEACEFULLY ASSEMBLE AND PROTEST THE GOVERNMENT, THE RIGHT TO SAY WHAT YOU WANT WITHOUT BEING CENSURED WHICH I’M PRETTY FUCKING SURE THIS DAMN LIBERAL CITE WILL CENSURE THIS POST, SO BY THE SECOND YOU ARE MAKING THIS COUNTRY MORE LIKE CHINA AND NORTH KOREA AND 1939 GERMANY, 1917 RUSSIA, LITERALLY JUST RUSSIA FROM THE BEGINNING UNTIL 1991, AND EVERY OTHER COUNTRY THAT GIVES NO RIGHTS TO IT’S CITIZENS SO FUCKING THANK YOU FOR THAT!

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”- Benjamin Fucking Franklin “Here Sir, the people govern.”- Alexander Fucking Hamilton

“It is not tyranny we desire; it’s a just, limited, federal government.” Also Alexander Fucking Hamilton

“All communities divide themselves into the few and the many. The first people are the rich and well-borne, the other the mass of the people...The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right...Give, therefore, to the first class a distinct, permanent share in the government. They will check the unsteadiness of the second, and as they can not receive any advantage by a change, they therefore will ever maintain good government.”- Also Alexander FUCKING Hamilton

Yeah, your new favorite founding father was very conservative. Just soak that up.

[princess1937]

Except in real life Angelica Schuyler would have most definitely been a Slytherin.  

And here are my reasons,

1) This girl was set on climbing her way to the top without caring for anybody but herself. In her youth she was obsessed with finding a husband and like her father, supported the Colonies for independence...until she met a handsome British Officer with whom she eloped with without looking back or a second thought. This shows her ambition. By the way, just for some historical trivia, this was years before the Schuylers met Alexander Hamilton.

2) Because she only cared about her status, for the years inbetween her marriage and Elizabeth meeting Alexander she didnd't talk to her family. But that's kind of me just being petty and angry at her. But in all seriousness she would actually manipulate her (many) suitors so they would fall head over heals in love with her, only for her to turn them down. She was very cunning in that way.

3) She figured out what made a man tick and she used that to her advantage. She was a debutante and knew how to work the scene and knew what it would take to land a husband in late 18th century colonial America. She was resourceful using her charm, looks, and sharp wit to reel in the suitors. 

With all this being said I know this came across as negative, however I don’t necessarily see Slytherins as a negative house, on the contrary I think that a healthy dose of ambition is good, being cunning means you can think fast and being resourceful is adapting to whatever is around you. Please look at my posts about Slytherins and the other houses. But yes, in the show Hamilton Angelica would be a Hufflepuff. Also I’m sorry my History Major came out with my Harry Potter nerd. That is super mega nerd power right there.

HUFFLEPUFF:

“I know my sister like I know my own mind You will never find anyone as trusting or as kind If I tell her that I love him she’d be silently resigned He’d be mine She would say, “I’m fine” She’d be lying”

–Lin-Manuel Miranda (Angelica Schuyler: Hamilton: Satisfied)