indoctrinating you into radfeminism so hard
Last active 4 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
i think that female-exclusive bisexual women bother people because it’s a group of women who are saying “yes i’m attracted to men, but that attraction does not mean i am obligated to date them or give them my time” and instead pursue only women. they really don’t want you to know that you’re allowed to say that, huh.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
In light of The Girls’ Spot gym backlash, where both men and women are comparing black women to males because black women are masculinised, getting this on my ig feed was infuriatingly ironic.

In case you didn’t know, under slavery in America black women and girls were experimented on by gynecologist J. Marion Sims. Despite the amount of pain he inflicted, he’s still considered the father of gynecology. It’s also no surprise that he is the fucker that invented the speculum.
And now comes my point.
Black women being masculinised does in no way mean they are seen or treated as males. White supremacist patriarchy always treated them as the females they are. The rapes, the forced breeding, these experiments: they all happened because
1) everybody knows what a woman is
2) slavery and the racist notion of black people feeling way less pain
allowed for an “easier” exploitation of black women and girls.
Also, white men didn’t teach sub-saharian African men misogyny. That was already there. Black women were already facing sex-based oppression, long before colonisation.
To compare the masculinisation of black women to maleness is an extreme show of misogynoir. It erases the history and the present day reality of black women and girls all around the world.
And this is the hill libfems are willing to die on, just for a bunch of delusional (and mostly white) men. I’m not surprised the sisterhood is fragile, i wouldn’t trust them either.
Anyway, i’m white so if any black woman wants to add to this post, please do so!
822 notes
·
View notes
Text
TRAs have figured out a way to make homophobia progressive and defended it by saying its to support trans people.
Lesbians must like dicks! Used to be lesbophobic conversion rhetoric, now it’s the typical trans person’s opinion.
If you defy gender norms, you’re an egg waiting to crack and become trans! Insinuating a butch lesbian was actually a man used to be anti-lesbian and erasure of her existence, now gnc women are told their lack of ‘femininity’ makes her no longer a woman.
You’re all perverts! Used to be how the typical homophobe demonized us by saying our homosexual attraction is unnatural, now we get called genital fetishists for experiencing normal homosexuality.
And yet we cannot call out this homophobia without being labeled transphobes or attacked and shamed. Insane
#tras when they find out actual homosexuals arent into people masquerading as the sex they’re attracted to#radical feminist safe#radical feminist community#radical feminism#radical feminists do touch
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
think about all the times girls on the internet looked up my little pony and were greeted with either gore or porn
"its the internet what do you expect" its actually fat sweaty useless men, too lazy to do anything else in their lives, who use the internet as an outlet for their rape fantasies about women that are making it so porn dense
we even begun to blame networking technology for the problems men cause
do you see why girls on the internet troon out?
862 notes
·
View notes
Text
That's it...? that's your 'queer positive' discord server?
That WAS JUST HETEROSEXUAL PEOPLE AND JAPANESE HENTAI
109 notes
·
View notes
Text
it's crazy how many super duper patriarchal things get retroactively justified in the name of being about love. yeah I'm sure women taking their husbands surname has always 100% been about recovering from trauma and distancing yourself from abusive family or whatever and has absolutely nothing at all to do with women being seen as property. great work here everyone, marriage as a concept has been redeemed through the power of pop psychology
17K notes
·
View notes
Text
Young girls are reading dark romance and eroticizing their own oppression, and violence done against them.
Young boys are watching pornography and eroticizing women’s oppression and violence done against women.
There is nothing subversive about kink or pornography. The status quo remains intact, men act, women submit. Now only, women are taught even younger than before, to romanticize the violence that will be done to them.
921 notes
·
View notes
Text
"[they] hate women for not being more sexually agreeable, as though sex is a commodity that should be redistributed to the needy, rather than a matter of personal desire."
-sophie gilbert, 'the world porn made', the atlantic, may 2025
172 notes
·
View notes
Text
“It’s fine for men to watch shojo anime and read shojo manga like Sailor Moon and Cardcaptor Sakura. It’s fine for men to make pornographic doujinshi of these, buy figurines, and jack off to the characters. It’s fine for men to completely invade a Pretty Cure forum created for young girls and scare said girls away. It’s fine for these men to twist the entire fandom around themselves, its fine for them to show up to Pretty Cure events in throngs and its fine for them to frantically grab all the free handouts before any of the girls can. It’s also fine for men to take these magical girl anime made for girls that celebrate being a girl and make them all about their pornography and which girl they most want to put their dick in. It’s fine, because theres even a cute name for them, ‘Ooki Tomodachi’ (Big Friend). It’s fine for them to do the same with My Little Pony, of course. It’s fine that they can make the voice actors of the show uncomfortable with personal questions, its fine that they can yell out rape jokes to them at conventions, its fine that they have basically made it impossible for any of the 8 year old girls the show was made for to ever google it in public. It’s fine for them to gather in the toy stores around the pony toys and intimidate young girls. It’s fine that the whole show, created to celebrate femininity and how ‘theres no wrong way to be a girl’ is now associated with their fetishes. And its so fine that these male fans get given a cute name (‘brony’), get documentaries made about them, have newspaper article after blog post after feature talking about how they are ‘challenging gender norms’ and ‘transforming pop culture’. But if a girl ‘trespasses’ into a male space, what happens? (Even when it isnt ‘trespassing’, in the case of Free!, in which a space was actually made for us ) We can expect such timeless classics as: degradation, ‘you’re not even a REAL fan!’ ‘I bet you dont even know ______’, all kinds of threats, and, of course, the posts you see on this blog.”
— - Male Otaku mad about Free! because its brilliant and accurate on so many levels (via b-a-m-b-i)
50K notes
·
View notes
Text
Let me be clear. I am talking to you about prostitution per se, without more violence, without extra violence, without a woman being hit, without a woman being pushed. Prostitution in and of itself is an abuse of a woman's body. Those of us who say this are accused of being simple-minded. But prostitution is very simple. And if you are not simple-minded, you will never understand it. The more complex you manage to be, the further away from the reality you will be--the safer you will be, the happier you will be, the more fun you will have discussing the issue of prostitution.
Andrea Dworkin, ‘Prostitution and Male Supremacy’ (1993)
#radical feminist safe#feminism#radical feminism#radical feminist community#andrea dworkin#dworkin#radblr
129 notes
·
View notes
Text
I made a vow to her: that I would use everything I knew, including from prostitution, to make the women’s movement stronger and better; that I’d give my life to the movement and for the movement. I promised to be honor-bound to the well-being of women, to do anything necessary for that well-being. I promised to live and to die if need be for women. I made that vow some thirty years ago, and I have not betrayed it yet.
Andrea Dworkin — Heartbreak: The Political Memoir of a Feminist Militant
243 notes
·
View notes
Text
"Pornography is the orchestrated destruction of women’s bodies and souls; rape, battery, incest, and prostitution animate it; dehumanization and sadism characterize it; it is war on women, serial assaults on dignity, identity, and human worth; it is tyranny. Each woman who has survived knows from the experience of her own life that pornography is captivity— the woman trapped in the picture used on the woman trapped wherever he’s got her."
Andrea Dworkin - Pornography: Men Possessing Women
57 notes
·
View notes
Text
From father's house to husband's house to a grave that still might not be her own, a woman acquiesces to male authority in order to gain some protection from male violence.
– Andrea Dworkin, Right Wing Women
79 notes
·
View notes