#191106

[blackpinkig]

[191106] jennierubyjane: Jen wearing Gen

[jisungarchive]

[Two Kids Room(투키즈룸)] VOL.5 Ep.09 미공개 컷

http://youtu.be/lVmlvYKwWxw

[sm-lucas]

191106 WayV Lucas at Gimpo International Airport‬ © HKExpoHall do not edit, crop, or remove the watermark

[hyuna-dates]

[decaffeinatednightmarefire]

TL-5903 Kompatybilny bateria do Siemens S7-400

Bateria elektryczna jest to ogniwo elektryczne, które służy do zasilania przenośnych sprzętów wymagających do pracy energii elektrycznej. Każda TADIRAN TL-5903 Bateria ma swoją żywotność i po tzw. wyczerpaniu nie nadaje się do dalszej eksploatacji. Alternatywą dla jednorazowych baterii są akumulatory, które można ładować i rozładowywać wielokrotnie. Dzieje się tak dzięki zdolności akumulatorów do gromadzenia i uwalniania energii elektrycznej poprzez odwracalne reakcje chemiczne zachodzące w elektrolicie. Akumulator może pracować w dwóch cyklach: ładowanie (kiedy jest podłączony do ładowarki) oraz praca (gdy znajduje się w urządzeniu które zasila). Akumulatory nie są jednak wieczne, ich żywotność wynosi zwykle od kilkuset do kilku tysięcy cykli ładowania po których stają się bezużyteczne.

(kod produktu: TL-5903) Bateria TADIRAN TL-5903 Jeśli potrzebny model baterii nie pojawia się w tytule Skontaktuj się z nami.

（niska cena i wysoka jakość! 100% kompatybilny! 1 rok gwarancji!）

Marki: TADIRAN

Rodzaj: Lithium

Kod produktu: TL-5903

Pojemność: 2400mAh/8.64Wh

Napięcie: 3.6V

Kup tanio Bateria TL-5903, 2400mAh/8.64Wh TL-5903 niska cena i wysoka jakość Bateria! Litowo-jonowy TADIRAN TL-5903 spełnia lub przekracza specyfikacje oryginalnej Bateria.

Kup Teraz: https://www.baterielaptopow.pl/bateria-do-tadiran-baterie-ceny-TL-5903-191106.html [UK] Battery TADIRAN TL-5903 >> [FR] TADIRAN TL-5903 Batterie >> [ES] Batería para TADIRAN TL-5903 >> [US] TADIRAN TL-5903 battery sale >> [IT] TADIRAN TL-5903 Bateria >> [FR] TADIRAN TL-5903 >> Baterie pour TADIRAN TL-5903 >> TADIRAN TL-5903

[companyknowledgenews]

Judge promises swift decision on fate of Missouri digital wagering initiative - Notice Important Internet https://www.merchant-business.com/judge-promises-swift-decision-on-fate-of-missouri-digital-wagering-initiative/?feed_id=191106&_unique_id=66db4a3a43b30 #GLOBAL - BLOGGER BLOGGER An all-day hearing Thursday (5 September) in a Missouri federal court did not yield a decision about whether or not a sports betting ballot initiative could move forward. But it was good theatre.Cole County Circuit Judge Daniel R. Green did not rule Thursday in Jacqueline Wood et Al v. John Ashcroft, but did say to expect a quick decision.In the lawsuit, Wood and fellow political consultant Blake Lawrence claim the voting districts used by the secretary of state to certify the Missouri wagering initiative are incorrect. In Missouri, a proposal needs verified signatures from 8% of voters in six of the state’s eight voting districts. Lawmakers redrew the congressional districts in 2020.According to the lawsuit, the secretary of state’s office used old districts to determine if enough verified signatures were collected. It then used the new districts to determine where voters live.Essentially that means that even if a signature came from a person who remains at the same address, it may not count in the same district now as it did prior to the 2020 redistricting.It also claims that some signatures are invalid.Despite the legal challenge, proponents Winning for Missouri Education have already begun campaigning. The initiative would go on the November presidential ballot.Winning for Missouri Education, the group behind the state’s sports betting ballot measure, says it will “continue to work tirelessly to inform voters about the benefits of this initiative” now that it will be on the election ballot this November. pic.twitter.com/w7F0banpG7— Geoff Zochodne (@GeoffZochodne) August 13, 2024Pro teams back proposalMissouri’s professional sports teams back the Missouri wagering initiative, which would leglalise statewide digital wagering. Some of the digital sportsbook-only companies have contributed to the campaign. But the state’s casinos are not all on board.The initiative would allow for existing casinos and professional sports venues to partner with commercial operators. Each casino company and venue would be allotted one skin, or platform. Under previous proposed legislation, the casino companies could have had one skin per location, up to three. But state lawmakers have failed to legalise despite repeated tries.DraftKings donated an additional $3.5 million to Winning for Missouri Education, a ballot initiative to legalize sports betting in Missouri.https://t.co/e4mVt6NVBU— Bennett Conlin (@BennettConlin) August 21, 2024Green listened to about seven hours of testimony, including going through signature rolls from Missouri’s District 1. Marc Ellinger, who is representing the two political consultants that brought the lawsuit, said his clients are focused on 768 questionable signatures from that district.During the hearing, both sides offered up signatures for discussion. If the ones Ellinger pointed to are deemed invalid, it would mean that the initiative does not have enough signatures to move forward.“In the course of review and evidence, you’ll find there are 768 signatures that were counted that were simply invalid,” said Ellinger in his opening statement. “Evidence will overwhelmingly show that petition did not receive necessary signatures to be placed on the ballot.”Proponents filed 370,000 signatures ahead for a 5 May deadline. The state requires 170,000 verified signatures from 8% of voters in at least six of eight voting districts.Piles of questionable signatures presentedMissouri Assistant Attorney General Eric Kinnaw is representing Ashcroft, the secretary of state. Kinnaw said that the signatures provided by local election officials are valid, and if they are found not to be, “Everything we’ve done in the last 20 years in ballot petitions would be thrown out.

”Kinnaw also argued that not only does case law support the existing process, but that the plaintiffs must prove individual signatures are invalid. Ellinger’s team attempted to do that during the hearing. National Political Consultants, hired by the plaintiffs, combed through signatures ahead of the hearing. It compiled a list of what it says are invalid signatures.The group, represented by Kevin Oglesby, however, has a questionable history, according to the Missouri Independent, which reported that National Political Consultants was previously “investigated for misrepresenting initiative petitions they were hired to canvas for in Michigan in 2020 and 2022”.Will judge examine signatures himself?But Oglesby said that in reviewing signatures for the Missouri wagering initiative, he found many that did not match voter registration cards. He also said that some had different names than those on voter cards. But the defense said that there is a process for verifying signatures that do not match voter registration cards. For example, signatures from married women who have changed their names would be counted.Deputy chief of staff for the secretary of state Scott Clark said the state uses two software programs to validate signatures. At least one of those programs shows a voter’s previous name and signature history.At one point during the hearing, Green asked if the attorneys expected the court to review the signatures for matches. Ellinger replied by saying that if the judge didn’t accept a witness’ testimony as fact, the he should review them. Green replied by saying, “I’ll take that as a yes”.The deadline to remove an initiative from the ballot is 5pm local time 10 September. Green ordered both parties to submit proposed judgements by Friday afternoon. His ruling could come any time between then and the deadline.“An all-day hearing Thursday (5 September) in a Missouri federal court did not yield a decision about whether or not a sports betting ballot initiative could move forward. But it…”Source Link: https://igamingbusiness.com/sports-betting/missouri-wagering-initiative-hearing/ http://109.70.148.72/~merchant29/6network/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/pexels-photo-6065141.jpeg An all-day hearing Thursday (5 September) in a Missouri federal court did not yield a decision about whether or not a sports betting ballot initiative could move forward. But it was good theatre. Cole County Circuit Judge Daniel R. Green did not rule Thursday in Jacqueline Wood et Al v. John Ashcroft, but did say … Read More

[tamagofried]

⤅ 81 .  do not edit or logo crop

(HQ: 1 - 2)

[svt-archivo]

06.11.2019 Twitter

[chengxiao-wjsn]

191106 Cheng Xiao at Shenzhen International Airport © 只追程潇 do not edit, crop, or remove the watermark

[monstax-info]

THE RETURN OF SHOWNU🐻:

D-534

[forjihyo]

♡ JIHYO photographed by JEONGYEON

[onfdata]

SmilE_Tion 스마일션🌰 | do not edit or crop logo

[yadom13]

I ᗪO IT ᕼOᗯᗴᐯᗴᖇ I ᗯᗩᑎT ᗷᗴᑕᗩᑌՏᗴ I'ᗰ ᗩ ᗷᗩᗪ ᘜIᖇᒪ

jennierubyjane Jen wearing Gen

¹⁹¹¹⁰⁶

[sm-lucas]

191106 WayV Lucas at Gimpo International Airport‬ © HKExpoHall do not edit, crop, or remove the watermark

[fyjm]

191106 RM’s Weverse Post | © 남준

This is daanpatbbang And I love it But jimin stole it

[seungyoun-updates]

191106 Cho Seungyoun at Seoul Music Festival © your name do not edit, crop, or remove the watermark