#Arvind Kejriwal Corrupt

[sangbadpratidin]

Arvind Kejriwal may skip 4th probe agency summons

Arvind Kejriwal is going to skip the 4th summons in the excise corruption case. Instead of going to the ED office, he will go to campaign

[shopsalary]

Delhi Liquor Scam: शराब घोटाले में किस चीज की हो रही है जांच? जानिए

Delhi Liquor Scam: शराब घोटाले में किस चीज की हो रही है जांच? जानिए

दिल्ली के उप मुख्यमंत्री मनीष सिसोदिया के ऊपर क्या आरोप हैं? क्या है 144 करोड़ रुपए का मामला? किन लोगों पर लगा है केस? देखें पूरी वीडियो. Source link

[hindulivesmatter]

"modi is using it to appease votebanks" bitch when hasn't religion or basically anything was ever used to appease votebanks?

The unconstitutional, Waqf Act? Lol.

“give me vote I'll get ₹1000 to every woman's account” - AAP, Punjab

“give us vote we'll ban cow slaughter” - congress. Then proceeded to copy Jalianwallah Bagh massacre and massacred every pandit that were heading towards parliament to ask for what they were promised.

“Give us vote we'll make buses free” (while state is at major debt lol) - Telangana

I would call BJP stupid if they didn't use this. Congress got 21 lawyers to fight against the ram mandir case. How is that not appeasement?

Congress filed affidavit that Rama is just a myth and entire sanatan is mythical. How is that not interfering with religion? Who the fuck asked congress with their IQ of my little brothers shoes their opinion on my prabhu?

Recently Arvind Kejriwal was caught in corruption, he gave 101 crores I think, that's 1.01 BILLION rupees to Waqf Board how is that not appeasement?

Why are you guys acting so naive???? That's a POLITICAL PARTY they want voters lol and we'd rather prefer them than those who would give our tax money to the godforsaken waqf board.

Continuation of previous anon.

Fuck congress <3

Anon these people don't WANT to change their minds. They're comfortable with their hatred as they are.

[warningsine]

This year’s general election in India arguably brought up more questions about the fairness of the electoral process than any other in the country’s history.

For example, in December, a bill was passed in India’s parliament that allowed election commissioners to be appointed by a panel dominated by the executive branch, which many feared would endanger free and fair elections.

And during the campaign, Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave a string of speeches that were widely seen as Islamophobic, in which he accused the opposition Congress Party of favouring Muslims. The Election Commission failed to adequately enforce the Model Code of Conduct when it came to these comments.

Opposition chief ministers, Arvind Kejriwal of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and Hemant Soren of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM), meanwhile, were arrested on charges of corruption. Both parties claimed the charges were politically motivated.

One of the lessons from the election, however, is that even when there are questions about how free and fair a vote is, opposition parties can dent the dominance of ruling parties.

In India’s election, the opposition presented a united front and stuck to a consistent message reflecting specific issues of voter discontent.

Why caste politics were so important

Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party did not perform as well as expected in the election, suffering major losses in its heartland northern Indian states. Modi began the six-week election campaign saying his party would win more than 400 seats. Ultimately, it was reduced to 240 seats, while the opposition Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) won 232 seats.

INDIA had a shaky start to the election. A founding member, the Janata Dal, joined Modi’s coalition earlier this year. INDIA also failed to reach a seat-sharing agreement with another member, Trinamool Congress (TMC), although that party remained part of the alliance.

Yet, as the campaign wore on, the BJP’s attacks on the opposition led to a more united front, focusing particularly on the issue of caste.

Indian society and politics are stratified by its caste system. It has roots in ancient religious texts, which grant symbolic and material rights and privileges to people based on their membership to a particular caste.

Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi’s speeches highlighted a commitment to protecting the Constitution and addressing the issue of caste-based injustice in India. He pledged to undertake a caste census to reveal the extent of disadvantage and concentration of wealth in society.

He also pointed out the government’s centralisation of power, as well as the upper caste-dominated media’s adulation of Modi and its inattention to issues of unemployment and inflation.

Lalu Prasad Yadav, a leader of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) party, which is also part of the INDIA coalition, warned the BJP intended to change the Constitution to end caste-based affirmative action. Though this was denied by Modi, the allegation seemed to strike a chord with voters.

Caste presented a dilemma for Modi’s Hindu nationalist politics, which valorises upper-caste Hindu practices and behaviours, while relying on support from the lower caste majority to win elections.

The BJP had sought to ameliorate this tension by promoting welfare schemes and accusing the secular opposition of colluding with Muslims to deprive the Hindu lower-caste poor.

In the lead-up to the election, Modi also claimed to have replaced traditional forms of caste stratification with four new castes of welfare “beneficiaries” – women, farmers, the youth and the poor.

In truth, however, the government’s welfare schemes consisted of paltry cash transfers, small loans, food rations and subsidies for private goods like toilets, which sought to compensate for the stagnation of incomes and lack of jobs. Spending on health and education by Modi’s government, which could have transformative effects on society, has languished.

The BJP’s infrastructure-driven economic program has benefited large companies, leading to accusations of crony capitalism. It has also failed to attract substantial foreign investment or grow the manufacturing sector to create more jobs.

Over the past decade – but particularly following the COVID pandemic – India has also become one of the world’s most unequal countries. Women, Dalits, Adivasis and Muslims have fared the worst.

Dalit politicians also grew in prominence

Perhaps the biggest surprise for the BJP were its heavy losses in its heartland state, Uttar Pradesh.

The Samajwadi Party (SP) had previously dominated Uttar Pradesh politics by promoting the interests of particular lower caste “other backward classes”. This tactic, however, generated resentment among other lower castes, which was exploited by the BJP to win power in 2017.

In this election, the SP appears to have fashioned a new, broader caste coalition.

This election also saw new shifts in Dalit politics, the lowest rung of the caste structure in India. In Uttar Pradesh, new Dalit political parties became increasingly prominent, such as the Azad Party led by Chandra Sekhar Azad.

Further south, the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) consolidated its status as the largest Dalit party in Tamil Nadu, winning all the seats it contested.

The future of Indian democracy

Indian democracy is not out of the woods yet. Activists, students, political leaders and journalists remain imprisoned.

The Hindu nationalist movement also has a history of inciting communal violence when things do not go its way in the electoral arena.

The Modi government started to extend its media censorship during the election, as well.

There is little to suggest that Modi will temper what many see as authoritarian tendencies, but there is now more resistance, scepticism and political alternatives that will hopefully aid India’s democratic recovery.

[swamyworld]

Aam Aadmi Party Lok Sabha Election Result 2024 | India News

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Lok Sabha Election Results 2024: The 18th General Lok Sabha Elections in India ended on June 1, 2024. Aam Aadmi Party has released its list of candidates for this crucial election. Aam Aadmi Party is a political party in India. It was founded by Arvind Kejriwal and his then associates after the Indian anti-corruption movement of 2011. AAP is currently the ruling party in the…

[deepkingstudent]

Delhi Lt Governor Takes Swipe At Arvind Kejriwal, Orders Corruption Probe Into Hospital Fire - NDTV

http://dlvr.it/T7WL3C

[a20051232]

Arvind Kejriwal Supreme Court Hearing Live Updates: The Supreme Court on Friday said that it may consider hearing arguments on interim bail of Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal because of upcoming elections. Kejriwal is currently lodged in the Tihar jail under judicial custody after his arrest on March 21 in the case. The top court issued ED a notice on April 15 and sought its response to Kejriwal's plea. On April 9, the high court upheld Kejriwal's arrest, saying there was no illegality and the ED was left with "little option" after he skipped repeated summonses and refused to join the investigation. The matter pertains to alleged corruption and money laundering in the formulation and execution of the Delhi government's now scrapped excise policy for 2021-22

[albertjordan88]

Letsdiskuss:- Has Arvind Kejriwal Been Arrested?

A former government employee went on to become a politician. As a member of the anti-corruption marketing and advertising and marketing campaign led with the aid of Anna Hazare, who changed right into a treasured useful resource, Arvind Kejriwal rose to prominence in 2011. The Aam Aadmi Party emerged as based totally on this movement, which sought to improve responsibility and transparency in Indian politics. After taking images of 28 of the 70 seats to be had within the  Delhi Assembly elections in 2013 and forming the government with the assistance of the Indian National Congress, AAP made a first-rate beginning. For more information about this article Click :- here

[petnews2day]

Aam Aadmi Party, AAP, Arvind Kejriwal, Delhi, BJP, PM Narendra Modi, Tihar Jail: Latest Protest Against Arvind Kejriwal Arrest: Mass Fasting Across India

New Post has been published on https://petn.ws/dYHaR

Aam Aadmi Party, AAP, Arvind Kejriwal, Delhi, BJP, PM Narendra Modi, Tihar Jail: Latest Protest Against Arvind Kejriwal Arrest: Mass Fasting Across India

Arvind Kejriwal was arrested on March 21 in the alleged liquor policy scam New Delhi: The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders and workers are observing a ‘samuhik upwas’ or mass fasting today to protest against the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister in a corruption case linked to the Delhi liquor policy. Here are the top […]

See full article at https://petn.ws/dYHaR #OtherNews

[newslime]

M K Stalin's Vision for Tamil Nadu: A Journey Towards Democracy and Social Justice

In the bustling political landscape of Tamil Nadu, amidst the echoes of historical legacies and the clamor for a brighter future, CM M K Stalin stands as a beacon of hope. With a resolute determination and a vision deeply rooted in the principles of democracy and social justice, Stalin charts the course for a new era in Tamil Nadu’s political narrative.

As he stands against the backdrop of his father’s legacy, the late DMK stalwart M Karunanidhi, Stalin exudes confidence, ready to lead Tamil Nadu into what he terms “a second struggle for Independence” in the forthcoming elections. Having already proven his mettle by leading the DMK to sweeping victories in both the Lok Sabha polls of 2019 and the state Assembly elections of 2021, Stalin emerges as the face of hope for the INDIA bloc in Tamil Nadu.

In an exclusive interview with The Indian Express, Stalin articulates his anti-BJP stance, portraying it as a fight against the central government’s hegemony. He emphasizes the critical importance of defending the core values of India: democracy, secularism, and pluralism. With unwavering determination, he positions the DMK and its allies as bulwarks against what he perceives as fascist forces threatening the nation’s democratic fabric.

Stalin acknowledges the uphill battle ahead but expresses confidence in the strength of his team, which includes prominent leaders like Akhilesh Yadav, Arvind Kejriwal, and Uddhav Thackeray. Together, they stand united in their commitment to safeguarding Indian democracy from authoritarian tendencies.

Reflecting on his tenure as CM, Stalin highlights the Dravidian model’s core ethos of “Everything for Everyone.” He underscores his administration’s focus on education, social justice, and skill development, aiming to fulfill the vision of an educated and equitable Tamil Nadu.

Addressing the issue of political corruption, Stalin emphasizes transparency and accountability as fundamental pillars of democracy. He points to the escalating financial demands of elections and the Supreme Court’s scrutiny of the BJP government’s electoral finance practices as indicators of the challenges faced in maintaining integrity in politics.

While the DMK’s influence in national politics is significant, Stalin emphasizes that its goals extend beyond mere ministerial positions. Rooted in the principles of federalism, secularism, and diversity, the DMK has played a pivotal role in shaping India’s political landscape, contributing to alliances and movements aimed at national welfare.

In navigating the evolving political landscape, Stalin emphasizes the importance of ideological commitment, contrasting it with the BJP’s strategy of cultivating larger-than-life personas. He sees a dynamic young leader like Rahul Gandhi as a potential challenger to the manufactured image of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Stalin’s success in maintaining a united alliance in Tamil Nadu reflects his leadership style, which prioritizes shared principles over political expediency. He envisions a legacy defined by steadfastness in upholding the values of Dravidianism and unwavering dedication to public service.

Beyond politics, Stalin’s personal interests reflect a multifaceted persona. From his passion for cricket to his dedication to physical fitness and his love for cinema, Stalin embodies a holistic approach to life, grounded in family values and cultural heritage.

As he forges ahead in his journey, Stalin remains steadfast in his commitment to serving the people of Tamil Nadu, guided by the principles of democracy, social justice, and inclusivity. In his vision lies the promise of a brighter future for Tamil Nadu, where every citizen has the opportunity to thrive and prosper.

[bhattandjoshiassociates-blog]

Removal Of Arvind Kejriwal: Another PIL Filed In Delhi High Court Seeking Removal From Post Of Chief Minister

Introduction Public Interest Litigations (PILs) have become a potent tool in the arsenal of Indian jurisprudence, enabling citizens to raise issues of public concern and seek judicial intervention. In recent times, the Delhi High Court has been witness to a surge in PILs targeting the tenure of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. The latest addition to this legal saga is a fresh PIL seeking Removal Of Arvind Kejriwal from office, spurred by his arrest in connection with the Enforcement Directorate's investigation into a liquor policy case. This essay delves into the intricacies of the PIL, examining its legal arguments, implications, and the broader context surrounding such legal challenges. The Emergence of PILs in Indian Jurisprudence To comprehend the significance of the PIL seeking the removal of Arvind Kejriwal from the post of Chief Minister, it is imperative to grasp the evolution and relevance of PILs in Indian jurisprudence. PILs represent a paradigm shift in legal proceedings, transcending traditional litigation confined to individual grievances to encompass broader issues affecting public interest. Originating from the concept of "Locus Standi," PILs empower any citizen or group to approach the courts on behalf of those unable to do so themselves, thereby democratizing access to justice. Arvind Kejriwal: A Controversial Figure Arvind Kejriwal's political journey has been marked by controversies, crusades, and electoral triumphs. Rising to prominence as an anti-corruption crusader alongside Anna Hazare, Kejriwal founded the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) with the vision of clean governance and people-centric policies. However, his tenure as Chief Minister of Delhi has been marred by confrontations with central authorities, allegations of impropriety, and legal battles, making him a polarizing figure in Indian politics. The PIL seeking his removal underscores the tumultuous landscape of his leadership and the relentless scrutiny he faces. The Liquor Policy Case and Kejriwal's Arrest The catalyst for the latest PIL targeting Kejriwal's tenure is his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with a liquor policy case. The intricacies of the case involve allegations of irregularities and improprieties in the formulation and implementation of Delhi's liquor policy, implicating Kejriwal and other key stakeholders. The ED's intervention and subsequent arrest of Kejriwal amplify the gravity of the accusations, fueling public outcry and legal challenges. The PIL, spearheaded by Vishnu Gupta, seizes upon this development to question Kejriwal's fitness to continue serving as Chief Minister, citing breach of trust and constitutional responsibilities. Legal Framework and Constitutional Provisions Central to the PIL's argument is the interpretation of constitutional provisions governing the dismissal of a Chief Minister. Article 164 of the Indian Constitution delineates the appointment and tenure of Chief Ministers, while Article 164(1) specifies that they hold office during the pleasure of the Governor. The PIL contends that Kejriwal's arrest under the PMLA constitutes a breach of the constitutional trust reposed in him, warranting his removal from office. Additionally, the petition invokes Articles 154, 162, and 163, highlighting the disruption caused by Kejriwal's absence in essential governmental functions and cabinet meetings. Judicial Precedents and the Role of the High Court The PIL seeking Kejriwal's removal from office is not the first legal challenge to his tenure as Chief Minister. Earlier petitions have been filed, seeking similar relief or questioning his eligibility to hold office. However, the judiciary, particularly the Delhi High Court, has adopted a cautious approach, emphasizing the separation of powers and the limited scope of judicial interference in matters concerning executive authority. Past judgments have underscored the need for concrete legal grounds and adherence to constitutional principles while adjudicating PILs targeting elected officials. Challenges and Implications of Removal Of Arvind Kejriwal The PIL presents several challenges and implications, both legal and political, that merit examination. From a legal standpoint, the petition must navigate intricate constitutional provisions, precedent-setting judgments, and the threshold for establishing grounds for the removal of a Chief Minister. Additionally, the timing of the PIL, coinciding with Kejriwal's arrest and ongoing legal proceedings, introduces complexities regarding judicial review and the presumption of innocence. Politically, the PIL adds to the mounting pressure on Kejriwal and the AAP government, exacerbating the existing tensions between the state and central authorities. Constitutional Trust and Governance: Implications of Removal Of Arvind Kejriwal At the heart of the PIL lies the concept of constitutional trust and the obligations inherent in holding public office. Elected representatives, particularly Chief Ministers, are entrusted with the responsibility of upholding constitutional values, ensuring good governance, and safeguarding the interests of the populace. Any perceived breach of this trust, whether through acts of corruption or misconduct, undermines the foundation of democratic governance and necessitates remedial action. The PIL contends that Kejriwal's arrest and the allegations against him signify a betrayal of this trust, warranting his removal from office to restore integrity and accountability in governance. Constitutional Mechanisms and Governance The PIL's invocation of Articles 154, 162, and 163 underscores the intricate interplay between constitutional mechanisms and governance structures. These articles delineate the powers and functions of the Governor, Chief Minister, and the Council of Ministers, outlining the framework for executive decision-making and policy implementation. Kejriwal's arrest and subsequent absence from cabinet meetings disrupt this framework, raising concerns about the continuity of governance and the efficacy of administrative processes. The PIL seeks judicial intervention to compel the state government to adhere to constitutional mandates and restore normalcy in governance. Legal Debates: The Case for Removal Of Arvind Kejriwal The PIL presents a compelling legal argument, rooted in constitutional provisions and the principles of accountability and transparency. It contends that Kejriwal's arrest under the PMLA constitutes a violation of constitutional trust, warranting his removal from office to uphold the sanctity of democratic institutions. Additionally, the disruption caused by his absence in cabinet meetings underscores the urgency of judicial intervention to ensure the smooth functioning of governance. However, counterarguments may focus on the presumption of innocence, the separation of powers, and the need for concrete evidence to justify Kejriwal's removal from office. Judicial Review and Remedial Measures As the PIL makes its way through the judicial process, the courts face the delicate task of balancing constitutional imperatives with the presumption of innocence and the principles of natural justice. Judicial review requires a meticulous examination of legal arguments, evidence, and precedents to arrive at a just and equitable decision. While the PIL seeks Kejriwal's removal from office, the courts may opt for alternative remedial measures, such as monitoring ongoing investigations, ensuring due process, and upholding the rule of law. The ultimate aim is to safeguard constitutional principles while preserving the integrity of democratic institutions. Conclusion The PIL seeking the removal of Arvind Kejriwal from the post of Chief Minister encapsulates the intersection of law, politics, and governance in contemporary India. Rooted in constitutional principles and invoking the imperative of constitutional trust, the PIL underscores the accountability of elected officials and the sanctity of democratic institutions. As the legal saga unfolds, the courts face the onerous task of adjudicating complex legal arguments, balancing competing interests, and upholding the rule of law. Read the full article

[swamyworld]

says Arvind Kejriwal in first rally after release from jail

New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal claimed on Saturday that no other party has been allegedly “harassed to this extent in the 75 years”. He targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who he said is claiming to “fight” corruption, “but all the thieves are in his party”. He also warned that all the opposition leaders including Chief Ministers Mamata Banerjee, and MK Stalin would be sent to…

[williamchasterson]

India opposition leader arrested over corruption claims

Arvind Kejriwal’s party accuses the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party of playing “dirty politics” in the case. from BBC News https://ift.tt/P3djC2Z via IFTTT